Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request, 8999-9000 [2010-3977]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 38 / Friday, February 26, 2010 / Notices renourishment, sand retention structures, and future storm damage reduction measures. NASA plans to hold a public meeting to discuss the project and to solicit comments on the Draft SRIPP PEIS. The public meeting is currently scheduled for: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, at the WFF Visitor Information Center, Route 175, Wallops Island, Virginia, 6 p.m.–9 p.m. Written public input on environmental issues and concerns associated with the WFF SRIPP are hereby requested. Olga M. Dominguez, Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure. [FR Doc. 2010–3896 Filed 2–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request National Science Foundation. Notice. AGENCY: sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES ACTION: SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104– 13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), and as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, the National Science Foundation invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on this information collection. This is the second notice for public comment; the first was published in the Federal Register at 74 FR 68637 and one comment was received regarding the materials provided. NSF is forwarding the proposed submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance simultaneously with the publication of this second notice. The full submission may be found at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain. DATES: Comments regarding these information collections are best assured of having their full effect if received by OMB within 30 days of publication in the Federal Register. ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding the information collection and requests for copies of the proposed information collection request should be addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 295, Arlington, VA 22230, or by e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov. Copies of the submission may be obtained by calling (703) 292–7556. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Contact Suzanne Plimpton, VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:39 Feb 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 the NSF Reports Clearance Officer, phone (703) 292–7556, or send e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339, which is accessible 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year (including Federal holidays). An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comment: On December 28, 2009, we published in the Federal Register (74 FR 68637) a 60-day notice of our intent to request reinstatement of this information collection authority from OMB. One comment came from Jean Public of Florham Park, NJ, via e-mail on January 1, 2010. The commenter requested a list of the surveys described in the notice. Response: NSF responded that this information is publicly available via two sources: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/ and https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/ seind10/. NSF believes that because the comment does not contain suggestions for altering the collection of information for which NSF is seeking OMB approval, NSF is proceeding with the clearance request. Title: Generic Clearance of the Science Resources Statistics Survey Improvement Projects. OMB Approval Number: 3145–0174. Abstract. Generic Clearance of the Science Resources Statistics Survey Improvement Projects. The National Science Foundation’s Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS) needs to collect timely data on constant changes in the science and technology sector and to provide the most complete and accurate information possible to policy makers in Congress and throughout government and academia. NSF/SRS conducts many surveys to obtain the data for these purposes. The Generic Clearance will be used to ensure that the highest quality data are obtained from these surveys. State-ofthe-art methodology will be used to develop, evaluate, and test questionnaires and survey concepts as well as to improve survey methodology. This may include field or pilot tests of questions for future large-scale surveys, as needed. PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 8999 Expected Respondents. The respondents will be from industry, academia, nonprofit organizations, members of the public, and State, local, and federal governments. Respondents will be either individuals or institutions, depending upon the survey under investigation. Qualitative procedures will generally be conducted in person or over the phone, but quantitative procedures may be conducted using mail, Web, e-mail, or phone modes, depending on the topic under investigation. Up to 19,150 respondents will be contacted across all survey improvement projects. No respondent will be contacted more than twice in one year under this generic clearance. Every effort will be made to use technology to limit the burden on respondents from small entities. Both qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to improve NSF’s current data collection instruments and processes and to reduce respondent burden, as well as to develop new surveys. Qualitative methods include, but are not limited to, expert review; exploratory, cognitive, and usability interviews; focus groups; and respondent debriefings. Cognitive and usability interviews may include the use of scenarios, paraphrasing, card sorts, vignette classifications, and rating tasks. Quantitative methods include, but are not limited to, telephone surveys, behavior coding, split panel tests, and field tests. Information being collected is not considered sensitive. In general, assurances of data confidentiality will not be provided to respondents in the pretests. Instead, respondents have the option of requesting that any and all data they provide be kept confidential. Use of the Information. The purpose of these studies is to use the latest and most appropriate methodology to improve NSF surveys. The data will be used internally to improve NSF surveys. Methodological findings may be presented externally in technical papers at conferences, published in the proceedings of conferences, or in journals. Improved NSF surveys will help policy makers in decisions on research and development funding, graduate education, scientific and technical workforce, regulations, and reporting guidelines, as well as contributing to reduced survey costs. Burden on the Public. NSF estimates that a total reporting and recordkeeping burden of 14,280 hours will result from activities to improve its surveys. The calculation is: E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM 26FEN1 9000 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 38 / Friday, February 26, 2010 / Notices Number of respondents 1 Potential survey name Graduate Student Survey ........................................................................................................................................ SESTAT Surveys ..................................................................................................................................................... Postdoc Project ........................................................................................................................................................ New and Redesigned R&D Surveys: Higher Education R&D ..................................................................................................................................... Government R&D ............................................................................................................................................. Nonprofit R&D .................................................................................................................................................. Business R&D .................................................................................................................................................. Microbusiness R&D .......................................................................................................................................... Survey of Scientific & Engineering Facilities ........................................................................................................... Public Understanding of S&E Surveys .................................................................................................................... Survey of Earned Doctorates .................................................................................................................................. Additional surveys not specified .............................................................................................................................. 2 1,500 Total ........................................................................................................................................................... Hours 10,000 2,000 2,500 5,000 2,500 400 60 100 50 150 300 200 700 1,200 1,200 180 300 150 450 300 50 450 1,200 16,660 14,280 1 Number of respondents listed for any individual survey may represent several methodological improvement projects. number refers to the science, engineering, and health-related departments within the academic institutions of the United States (not the academic institutions themselves). 2 This Comments: Comments are invited on (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: February 23, 2010. Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation. [FR Doc. 2010–3977 Filed 2–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Comment Request: National Science Foundation Proposal/Award Information—Grant Proposal Guide National Science Foundation. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans to request renewed clearance of this collection. In accordance with the VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:39 Feb 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are providing opportunity for public comment on this action. After obtaining and considering public comment, NSF will prepare the submission requesting OMB clearance of this collection for no longer than 3 years. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Written comments should be received by April 27, 2010 to be assured of consideration. Comments received after that date will be considered to the extent practicable. ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding the information collection and requests for copies of the proposed information collection request should be addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 295, Arlington, VA 22230, or by e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Plimpton on (703) 292–7556 or send e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title of Collection: ‘‘National Sciences Foundation Proposal/Award Information-Grant Proposal Guide’’. OMB Approval Number: 3145–0058. Expiration Date of Approval: August 31, 2004. Type of Request: Intent to seek approval to extend with revision an information collection for three years. Proposed Project: The National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (Pub. L. 81–507) set forth NSF’s mission and purpose: ‘‘To promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense. * * *’’ The Act authorized and directed NSF to initiate and support: • Basic scientific research and research fundamental to the engineering process; • Programs to strengthen scientific and engineering research potential; • Science and engineering education programs at all levels and in all the various fields of science and engineering; • Programs that provide a source of information for policy formulation; and • Other activities to promote these ends. Over the years, NSF’s statutory authority has been modified in a number of significant ways. In 1968, authority to support applied research was added to the Organic Act. In 1980, The Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act gave NSF standing authority to support activities to improve the participation of women and minorities in science and engineering. Another major change occurred in 1986, when engineering was accorded E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM 26FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 38 (Friday, February 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8999-9000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3977]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 
(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), and as part of its continuing effort to 
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, the National Science Foundation 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on this information collection. This is the 
second notice for public comment; the first was published in the 
Federal Register at 74 FR 68637 and one comment was received regarding 
the materials provided. NSF is forwarding the proposed submission to 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance simultaneously 
with the publication of this second notice. The full submission may be 
found at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain PRAMain.

DATES: Comments regarding these information collections are best 
assured of having their full effect if received by OMB within 30 days 
of publication in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding the information collection and 
requests for copies of the proposed information collection request 
should be addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm. 295, Arlington, VA 
22230, or by e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov. Copies of the submission may 
be obtained by calling (703) 292-7556.

For Additional Information or Comments: Contact Suzanne Plimpton, the 
NSF Reports Clearance Officer, phone (703) 292-7556, or send e-mail to 
splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-800-877-8339, which is accessible 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 
days a year (including Federal holidays).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information 
unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB 
control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to 
respond to the collection of information that such persons are not 
required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Comment: On December 28, 2009, we published in the Federal Register 
(74 FR 68637) a 60-day notice of our intent to request reinstatement of 
this information collection authority from OMB. One comment came from 
Jean Public of Florham Park, NJ, via e-mail on January 1, 2010. The 
commenter requested a list of the surveys described in the notice.
    Response: NSF responded that this information is publicly available 
via two sources: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/ and https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/. NSF believes that because the comment does not 
contain suggestions for altering the collection of information for 
which NSF is seeking OMB approval, NSF is proceeding with the clearance 
request.
    Title: Generic Clearance of the Science Resources Statistics Survey 
Improvement Projects.
    OMB Approval Number: 3145-0174.
    Abstract. Generic Clearance of the Science Resources Statistics 
Survey Improvement Projects. The National Science Foundation's Division 
of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS) needs to collect timely data 
on constant changes in the science and technology sector and to provide 
the most complete and accurate information possible to policy makers in 
Congress and throughout government and academia. NSF/SRS conducts many 
surveys to obtain the data for these purposes. The Generic Clearance 
will be used to ensure that the highest quality data are obtained from 
these surveys. State-of-the-art methodology will be used to develop, 
evaluate, and test questionnaires and survey concepts as well as to 
improve survey methodology. This may include field or pilot tests of 
questions for future large-scale surveys, as needed.
    Expected Respondents. The respondents will be from industry, 
academia, nonprofit organizations, members of the public, and State, 
local, and federal governments. Respondents will be either individuals 
or institutions, depending upon the survey under investigation. 
Qualitative procedures will generally be conducted in person or over 
the phone, but quantitative procedures may be conducted using mail, 
Web, e-mail, or phone modes, depending on the topic under 
investigation. Up to 19,150 respondents will be contacted across all 
survey improvement projects. No respondent will be contacted more than 
twice in one year under this generic clearance. Every effort will be 
made to use technology to limit the burden on respondents from small 
entities.
    Both qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to improve 
NSF's current data collection instruments and processes and to reduce 
respondent burden, as well as to develop new surveys. Qualitative 
methods include, but are not limited to, expert review; exploratory, 
cognitive, and usability interviews; focus groups; and respondent 
debriefings. Cognitive and usability interviews may include the use of 
scenarios, paraphrasing, card sorts, vignette classifications, and 
rating tasks. Quantitative methods include, but are not limited to, 
telephone surveys, behavior coding, split panel tests, and field tests.
    Information being collected is not considered sensitive. In 
general, assurances of data confidentiality will not be provided to 
respondents in the pretests. Instead, respondents have the option of 
requesting that any and all data they provide be kept confidential.
    Use of the Information. The purpose of these studies is to use the 
latest and most appropriate methodology to improve NSF surveys. The 
data will be used internally to improve NSF surveys. Methodological 
findings may be presented externally in technical papers at 
conferences, published in the proceedings of conferences, or in 
journals. Improved NSF surveys will help policy makers in decisions on 
research and development funding, graduate education, scientific and 
technical workforce, regulations, and reporting guidelines, as well as 
contributing to reduced survey costs.
    Burden on the Public. NSF estimates that a total reporting and 
recordkeeping burden of 14,280 hours will result from activities to 
improve its surveys. The calculation is:

[[Page 9000]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Number of
          Potential survey name             respondents        Hours
                                                \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Graduate Student Survey.................       \2\ 1,500           2,500
SESTAT Surveys..........................          10,000           5,000
Postdoc Project.........................           2,000           2,500
New and Redesigned R&D Surveys:
    Higher Education R&D................             400           1,200
    Government R&D......................              60             180
    Nonprofit R&D.......................             100             300
    Business R&D........................              50             150
    Microbusiness R&D...................             150             450
Survey of Scientific & Engineering                   300             300
 Facilities.............................
Public Understanding of S&E Surveys.....             200              50
Survey of Earned Doctorates.............             700             450
Additional surveys not specified........           1,200           1,200
                                         -------------------------------
        Total...........................          16,660          14,280
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Number of respondents listed for any individual survey may represent
  several methodological improvement projects.
\2\ This number refers to the science, engineering, and health-related
  departments within the academic institutions of the United States (not
  the academic institutions themselves).

    Comments: Comments are invited on (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the Agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of 
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information 
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.

    Dated: February 23, 2010.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2010-3977 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.