National Environmental Policy Act; Wallops Flight Facility Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure Protection Program, 8997-8999 [2010-3896]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 38 / Friday, February 26, 2010 / Notices
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of NASA, including
whether the information collected has
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
NASA’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including automated
collection techniques or the use of other
forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection.
They will also become a matter of
public record.
Brenda Maxwell,
NASA PRA Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–3895 Filed 2–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (10–021)]
NASA Advisory Council; Science
Committee; Earth Science
Subcommittee; Meeting
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA)
announces a meeting of the Earth
Science Subcommittee of the NASA
Advisory Council (NAC). This
Subcommittee reports to the Science
Committee of the NAC. The Meeting
will be held for the purpose of soliciting
from the scientific community and other
persons scientific and technical
information relevant to program
planning.
DATES: Tuesday, March 16, 2010,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Wednesday,
March 17, 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. EST.
ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, 300 E
Street, SW., Room 8R40 (March 16,
2010) and Room 3H46 (March 17, 2010),
Washington, DC 20546.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Marian Norris, Science Mission
Directorate, NASA Headquarters,
Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358–4452,
fax (202) 358–4118, or
mnorris@nasa.gov.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:39 Feb 25, 2010
The
meeting will be open to the public up
to the capacity of the room. The agenda
for the meeting includes the following
topics:
—Earth Science Division Budget
Update
—Science Mission Directorate Science
Plan Update
—Climate Initiative Plan
It is imperative that the meeting be held
on these dates to accommodate the
scheduling priorities of the key
participants. Attendees will be
requested to sign a register and to
comply with NASA security
requirements, including the
presentation of a valid picture ID, before
receiving an access badge. Foreign
nationals attending this meeting will be
required to provide a copy of their
passport, visa, or green card in addition
to providing the following information
no less than 10 working days prior to
the meeting: full name; gender; date/
place of birth; citizenship; visa/green
card information (number, type,
expiration date); passport information
(number, country, expiration date);
employer/affiliation information (name
of institution, address, country,
telephone); title/position of attendee. To
expedite admittance, attendees with
U.S. citizenship can provide identifying
information 3 working days in advance
by contacting Marian Norris via e-mail
at mnorris@nasa.gov or by telephone at
(202) 358–4452.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 220001
Dated: February 17, 2010.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–3899 Filed 2–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (10–022)]
National Environmental Policy Act;
Wallops Flight Facility Shoreline
Restoration and Infrastructure
Protection Program
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of the
Draft Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement (PEIS) for the Wallops
Flight Facility (WFF) Shoreline
Restoration and Infrastructure
Protection Program (SRIPP).
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act, as amended,
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8997
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for Implementing the
Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
parts 1500–1508), and NASA’s NEPA
policy and procedures (14 CFR part
1216, subpart 1216.3), NASA has
prepared and issued the Draft PEIS for
the proposed SRIPP at WFF. The U.S.
Department of the Interior, Minerals
Management Service (MMS), and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have
served as Cooperating Agencies in
preparing the Draft PEIS.
NASA is proposing to implement a
fifty-year design life storm damage
reduction project at its WFF on Wallops
Island, Virginia. The project would be
implemented to reduce the potential for
storm-induced physical damage to the
over $1 billion in Federal and State
assets on Wallops Island. The Draft PEIS
examines in detail three project
alternatives, each expected to provide
substantial damage reduction from
storms with intensities ranging up to
approximately the 100-year return
interval storm. Although some
reduction in flooding can be expected
under each alternative, the primary
purpose of the proposal is not flood
protection, rather it is moving
destructive wave energy further away
from the Wallops Island shoreline and
the infrastructure behind it.
Alternative One, NASA’s preferred
alternative, would include extending
the existing Wallops Island seawall up
to a maximum of 1,400 meters (m)
(4,600 feet [ft]) south and placing an
estimated 2.5 million cubic meters
(MCM) (3.2 million cubic yards [MCY])
of sand along the shoreline. Alternative
Two would include the same seawall
extension as Alternative One; however
the sand placed along the shoreline
would be less, at approximately 2.2
MCM (2.9 MCY). Under this alternative,
NASA would also construct a groin
perpendicular to the shoreline at the
south end of the project site to limit the
volume of nearshore sand being
transported from the restored Wallops
Island beach to the south. Alternative
Three would entail the same seawall
extension as in Alternatives One and
Two; however, sand placement would
be the least of the Alternatives at
approximately 2.1 MCM (2.8 MCY).
NASA would construct a single
detached breakwater parallel to the
shoreline at the south end of the project
site to retain sand under Alternative
Three. Under all three project
alternatives, NASA would obtain the
sand required for its initial beach
nourishment from an unnamed shoal
(referred to as Shoal A) located in
Federal waters approximately 23
kilometers (km) (14 miles [mi]) east of
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
8998
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 38 / Friday, February 26, 2010 / Notices
Wallops Island. Sand for an expected
nine future renourishment cycles could
come from either Shoal A or a second
offshore shoal in Federal waters referred
to as Shoal B, approximately 31 km (19
mi) east of the project site. Additionally,
NASA is considering transporting sand
that accumulates on north Wallops
Island to supplement its future
renourishment needs (commonly known
as ‘‘backpassing’’). It is estimated that up
to half of the required renourishment
volumes could be obtained from
‘‘backpassing.’’ The No Action
Alternative is to not implement the WFF
SRIPP, but to continue making
emergency repairs to the Wallops Island
shoreline, as necessary.
NASA will hold a public comment
meeting as part of the review of the
Draft PEIS. The public meeting location
and date as currently scheduled are
provided under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION below.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to
submit comments on environmental
issues and concerns, preferably in
writing, on or before April 15, 2010, or
45 days from the date of publication in
the Federal Register of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s
Notice of Availability of the Draft SRIPP
PEIS, whichever is later.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted by
mail should be addressed to 250/NEPA
Manager, WFF Shoreline Restoration
and Infrastructure Protection Program,
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center’s
Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island,
Virginia 23337. Comments may be
submitted via e-mail to wff_shoreline_
eis@majordomo.gsfc.nasa.gov.
The Draft PEIS may be reviewed at the
following locations:
(a) Chincoteague Island Library, 4077
Main Street, Chincoteague, Virginia
23336 (757–336–3460).
(b) Eastern Shore Public Library,
23610 Front Street, Accomac, Virginia
23301 (757–787–3400).
(c) Northampton Free Library, 7401
Railroad Avenue, Nassawadox, Virginia
23413 (757–442–2839).
(d) NASA Wallops Flight Facility
Technical Library, Building E–105,
Wallops Island, Virginia 23337 (757–
824–1065).
(e) NASA Headquarters Library, Room
1J20, 300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20546–0001 (202–358–0168).
A limited number of hard copies of
the Draft PEIS are available, on a first
request basis, by contacting 250/NEPA
Manager, NASA WFF, Environmental
Office, Code 250.W, Wallops Island,
Virginia 23337; or electronic mail at
wff_shoreline_eis@
majordomo.gsfc.nasa.gov. The Draft
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:39 Feb 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
SRIPP PEIS is available on the Internet
in Adobe® portable document format at
https://sites.wff.nasa.gov/code250/
shoreline_eis.html. The Notice of Intent
to prepare the Draft SRIPP PEIS, issued
on March 24, 2009, is also available on
the Internet at the same Web site
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information on the WFF
SRIPP can be obtained by addressing an
e-mail to wff_shoreline_eis@
majordomo.gsfc.nasa.gov or by mailing
to 250/NEPA Manager, WFF Shoreline
Restoration and Infrastructure
Protection Program, NASA Goddard
Space Flight Center’s Wallops Flight
Facility, Wallops Island, Virginia 23337.
Additional information about the WFF
SRIPP and NASA’s NEPA process may
be found on the Internet at https://
sites.wff.nasa.gov/code250/shoreline
_eis.html.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Draft
PEIS addresses the environmental
impacts associated with NASA’s
proposed implementation of a 50-year
design life storm damage reduction
program along the shoreline of Wallops
Island. The environmental impacts of
principal concern are those that could
result from dredging sand from offshore
shoals and from the construction of a
sand retention structure at the south end
of the project site.
The three action alternatives
considered in the Draft PEIS would all
provide the facilities on Wallops Island
equal levels of storm damage reduction
for the duration of the program. Each
alternative would involve the
establishment of an approximately 34 m
(110 ft) wide dry beach along
approximately 6,000 m (19,700 ft) of the
Wallops Island shoreline to serve as a
primary line of defense from destructive
storm waves. In addition to the beach,
a sand dune would be created to cover
the ocean side of the existing and
proposed seawall. The remaining
portion of the fill would be placed
underwater and would gradually slope
to the east. It is expected that the fill
alone would provide considerable
damage reduction from a 30-year return
interval storm. With the fill combined
with the rock seawall, the project would
provide substantial infrastructure
damage reduction from up to an
approximately 100-year return interval
storm. A rock sand retention structure (a
groin or breakwater) is included under
Alternatives Two and Three,
respectively, to slow the transport of
sand from the project site and
potentially reduce the amount of beach
fill needed both initially and throughout
the lifecycle of the project.
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
All three alternatives would involve
an initial construction phase and future
follow-on maintenance cycles. The
initial construction phase would likely
include three distinct elements
spanning approximately three fiscal
years:
Year 1 Activities—The existing rock
seawall would be extended a minimum
of 460 m (1,500 ft) up to a maximum of
1,400 m (4,600 ft) south. The actual
length of seawall extension constructed
in Year 1 would be based upon available
funding; however, additional
lengthening (up to the 1,400 m [4,600 ft]
total length) would be accomplished in
future years as funding becomes
available.
Year 2 Activities—Approximately
one-third of the sand necessary for
beach nourishment would be placed
along the central areas of the Wallops
Island shoreline that are currently
reinforced by the rock seawall. The
objective for this first fill cycle would be
to restore the deficit of sand caused by
the continual erosion at the base of the
seawall. Sand placement would likely
involve removing sand from the shoal
by hopper dredges and pumping the
material onto the beach.
Year 3 Activities—The remaining
sand needed to complete the beach
nourishment would be placed along the
Wallops Island shoreline. Additionally,
under Alternatives Two and Three, the
sand retention structure would be
constructed.
Subsequent beach renourishment
cycles would vary throughout the
lifecycle of the proposed project. Factors
dictating the frequency and magnitude
of such actions would include project
performance as revealed through
ongoing monitoring, storm severity and
frequency, and availability of funding.
Given the dynamic nature of the ocean
environment, and that exact locations
and magnitude of renourishment cycles
may fluctuate, additional NEPA
documentation for renourishment
actions may be prepared in the future,
as appropriate. For each of the action
alternatives considered in the PEIS, the
renourishment cycle is anticipated to be
every five years, totaling nine cycles
over the fifty-year design life of the
project.
In addition to the construction
activities outlined for each of the three
action alternatives, NASA would
implement a rigorous monitoring
program that would begin with
construction in Year 1 and continue
throughout the project. The intent of the
monitoring program is to measure the
performance of the project, and through
adaptive management, make informed
decisions regarding the need for
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 38 / Friday, February 26, 2010 / Notices
renourishment, sand retention
structures, and future storm damage
reduction measures.
NASA plans to hold a public meeting
to discuss the project and to solicit
comments on the Draft SRIPP PEIS. The
public meeting is currently scheduled
for:
Tuesday, March 16, 2010, at the WFF
Visitor Information Center, Route 175,
Wallops Island, Virginia, 6 p.m.–9 p.m.
Written public input on
environmental issues and concerns
associated with the WFF SRIPP are
hereby requested.
Olga M. Dominguez,
Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure.
[FR Doc. 2010–3896 Filed 2–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Notice.
AGENCY:
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), and as part
of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden, the
National Science Foundation invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on this information collection.
This is the second notice for public
comment; the first was published in the
Federal Register at 74 FR 68637 and one
comment was received regarding the
materials provided. NSF is forwarding
the proposed submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance simultaneously with the
publication of this second notice. The
full submission may be found at:
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain.
DATES: Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received by
OMB within 30 days of publication in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the information collection and
requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request should be
addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm.
295, Arlington, VA 22230, or by e-mail
to splimpto@nsf.gov. Copies of the
submission may be obtained by calling
(703) 292–7556.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR
COMMENTS: Contact Suzanne Plimpton,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:39 Feb 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
the NSF Reports Clearance Officer,
phone (703) 292–7556, or send e-mail to
splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use
a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1–800–877–8339, which is accessible 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a
year (including Federal holidays).
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comment: On December 28, 2009, we
published in the Federal Register (74
FR 68637) a 60-day notice of our intent
to request reinstatement of this
information collection authority from
OMB. One comment came from Jean
Public of Florham Park, NJ, via e-mail
on January 1, 2010. The commenter
requested a list of the surveys described
in the notice.
Response: NSF responded that this
information is publicly available via two
sources: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/
and https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/
seind10/. NSF believes that because the
comment does not contain suggestions
for altering the collection of information
for which NSF is seeking OMB
approval, NSF is proceeding with the
clearance request.
Title: Generic Clearance of the
Science Resources Statistics Survey
Improvement Projects.
OMB Approval Number: 3145–0174.
Abstract. Generic Clearance of the
Science Resources Statistics Survey
Improvement Projects. The National
Science Foundation’s Division of
Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS)
needs to collect timely data on constant
changes in the science and technology
sector and to provide the most complete
and accurate information possible to
policy makers in Congress and
throughout government and academia.
NSF/SRS conducts many surveys to
obtain the data for these purposes. The
Generic Clearance will be used to
ensure that the highest quality data are
obtained from these surveys. State-ofthe-art methodology will be used to
develop, evaluate, and test
questionnaires and survey concepts as
well as to improve survey methodology.
This may include field or pilot tests of
questions for future large-scale surveys,
as needed.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8999
Expected Respondents. The
respondents will be from industry,
academia, nonprofit organizations,
members of the public, and State, local,
and federal governments. Respondents
will be either individuals or
institutions, depending upon the survey
under investigation. Qualitative
procedures will generally be conducted
in person or over the phone, but
quantitative procedures may be
conducted using mail, Web, e-mail, or
phone modes, depending on the topic
under investigation. Up to 19,150
respondents will be contacted across all
survey improvement projects. No
respondent will be contacted more than
twice in one year under this generic
clearance. Every effort will be made to
use technology to limit the burden on
respondents from small entities.
Both qualitative and quantitative
methods will be used to improve NSF’s
current data collection instruments and
processes and to reduce respondent
burden, as well as to develop new
surveys. Qualitative methods include,
but are not limited to, expert review;
exploratory, cognitive, and usability
interviews; focus groups; and
respondent debriefings. Cognitive and
usability interviews may include the use
of scenarios, paraphrasing, card sorts,
vignette classifications, and rating tasks.
Quantitative methods include, but are
not limited to, telephone surveys,
behavior coding, split panel tests, and
field tests.
Information being collected is not
considered sensitive. In general,
assurances of data confidentiality will
not be provided to respondents in the
pretests. Instead, respondents have the
option of requesting that any and all
data they provide be kept confidential.
Use of the Information. The purpose
of these studies is to use the latest and
most appropriate methodology to
improve NSF surveys. The data will be
used internally to improve NSF surveys.
Methodological findings may be
presented externally in technical papers
at conferences, published in the
proceedings of conferences, or in
journals. Improved NSF surveys will
help policy makers in decisions on
research and development funding,
graduate education, scientific and
technical workforce, regulations, and
reporting guidelines, as well as
contributing to reduced survey costs.
Burden on the Public. NSF estimates
that a total reporting and recordkeeping
burden of 14,280 hours will result from
activities to improve its surveys. The
calculation is:
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 38 (Friday, February 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8997-8999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3896]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (10-022)]
National Environmental Policy Act; Wallops Flight Facility
Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure Protection Program
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of the Draft Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement (PEIS) for the Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) Shoreline
Restoration and Infrastructure Protection Program (SRIPP).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, as amended,
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
parts 1500-1508), and NASA's NEPA policy and procedures (14 CFR part
1216, subpart 1216.3), NASA has prepared and issued the Draft PEIS for
the proposed SRIPP at WFF. The U.S. Department of the Interior,
Minerals Management Service (MMS), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
have served as Cooperating Agencies in preparing the Draft PEIS.
NASA is proposing to implement a fifty-year design life storm
damage reduction project at its WFF on Wallops Island, Virginia. The
project would be implemented to reduce the potential for storm-induced
physical damage to the over $1 billion in Federal and State assets on
Wallops Island. The Draft PEIS examines in detail three project
alternatives, each expected to provide substantial damage reduction
from storms with intensities ranging up to approximately the 100-year
return interval storm. Although some reduction in flooding can be
expected under each alternative, the primary purpose of the proposal is
not flood protection, rather it is moving destructive wave energy
further away from the Wallops Island shoreline and the infrastructure
behind it.
Alternative One, NASA's preferred alternative, would include
extending the existing Wallops Island seawall up to a maximum of 1,400
meters (m) (4,600 feet [ft]) south and placing an estimated 2.5 million
cubic meters (MCM) (3.2 million cubic yards [MCY]) of sand along the
shoreline. Alternative Two would include the same seawall extension as
Alternative One; however the sand placed along the shoreline would be
less, at approximately 2.2 MCM (2.9 MCY). Under this alternative, NASA
would also construct a groin perpendicular to the shoreline at the
south end of the project site to limit the volume of nearshore sand
being transported from the restored Wallops Island beach to the south.
Alternative Three would entail the same seawall extension as in
Alternatives One and Two; however, sand placement would be the least of
the Alternatives at approximately 2.1 MCM (2.8 MCY). NASA would
construct a single detached breakwater parallel to the shoreline at the
south end of the project site to retain sand under Alternative Three.
Under all three project alternatives, NASA would obtain the sand
required for its initial beach nourishment from an unnamed shoal
(referred to as Shoal A) located in Federal waters approximately 23
kilometers (km) (14 miles [mi]) east of
[[Page 8998]]
Wallops Island. Sand for an expected nine future renourishment cycles
could come from either Shoal A or a second offshore shoal in Federal
waters referred to as Shoal B, approximately 31 km (19 mi) east of the
project site. Additionally, NASA is considering transporting sand that
accumulates on north Wallops Island to supplement its future
renourishment needs (commonly known as ``backpassing''). It is
estimated that up to half of the required renourishment volumes could
be obtained from ``backpassing.'' The No Action Alternative is to not
implement the WFF SRIPP, but to continue making emergency repairs to
the Wallops Island shoreline, as necessary.
NASA will hold a public comment meeting as part of the review of
the Draft PEIS. The public meeting location and date as currently
scheduled are provided under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit comments on
environmental issues and concerns, preferably in writing, on or before
April 15, 2010, or 45 days from the date of publication in the Federal
Register of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Notice of
Availability of the Draft SRIPP PEIS, whichever is later.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted by mail should be addressed to 250/NEPA
Manager, WFF Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure Protection
Program, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center's Wallops Flight Facility,
Wallops Island, Virginia 23337. Comments may be submitted via e-mail to
wff_shoreline_eis@majordomo.gsfc.nasa.gov.
The Draft PEIS may be reviewed at the following locations:
(a) Chincoteague Island Library, 4077 Main Street, Chincoteague,
Virginia 23336 (757-336-3460).
(b) Eastern Shore Public Library, 23610 Front Street, Accomac,
Virginia 23301 (757-787-3400).
(c) Northampton Free Library, 7401 Railroad Avenue, Nassawadox,
Virginia 23413 (757-442-2839).
(d) NASA Wallops Flight Facility Technical Library, Building E-105,
Wallops Island, Virginia 23337 (757-824-1065).
(e) NASA Headquarters Library, Room 1J20, 300 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20546-0001 (202-358-0168).
A limited number of hard copies of the Draft PEIS are available, on
a first request basis, by contacting 250/NEPA Manager, NASA WFF,
Environmental Office, Code 250.W, Wallops Island, Virginia 23337; or
electronic mail at wff_shoreline_eis@majordomo.gsfc.nasa.gov. The
Draft SRIPP PEIS is available on the Internet in Adobe[supreg] portable
document format at https://sites.wff.nasa.gov/code250/shoreline_eis.html. The Notice of Intent to prepare the Draft SRIPP PEIS, issued
on March 24, 2009, is also available on the Internet at the same Web
site address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information on the WFF
SRIPP can be obtained by addressing an e-mail to wff_shoreline_eis@majordomo.gsfc.nasa.gov or by mailing to 250/NEPA Manager, WFF
Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure Protection Program, NASA
Goddard Space Flight Center's Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island,
Virginia 23337. Additional information about the WFF SRIPP and NASA's
NEPA process may be found on the Internet at https://sites.wff.nasa.gov/code250/shoreline_eis.html.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Draft PEIS addresses the environmental
impacts associated with NASA's proposed implementation of a 50-year
design life storm damage reduction program along the shoreline of
Wallops Island. The environmental impacts of principal concern are
those that could result from dredging sand from offshore shoals and
from the construction of a sand retention structure at the south end of
the project site.
The three action alternatives considered in the Draft PEIS would
all provide the facilities on Wallops Island equal levels of storm
damage reduction for the duration of the program. Each alternative
would involve the establishment of an approximately 34 m (110 ft) wide
dry beach along approximately 6,000 m (19,700 ft) of the Wallops Island
shoreline to serve as a primary line of defense from destructive storm
waves. In addition to the beach, a sand dune would be created to cover
the ocean side of the existing and proposed seawall. The remaining
portion of the fill would be placed underwater and would gradually
slope to the east. It is expected that the fill alone would provide
considerable damage reduction from a 30-year return interval storm.
With the fill combined with the rock seawall, the project would provide
substantial infrastructure damage reduction from up to an approximately
100-year return interval storm. A rock sand retention structure (a
groin or breakwater) is included under Alternatives Two and Three,
respectively, to slow the transport of sand from the project site and
potentially reduce the amount of beach fill needed both initially and
throughout the lifecycle of the project.
All three alternatives would involve an initial construction phase
and future follow-on maintenance cycles. The initial construction phase
would likely include three distinct elements spanning approximately
three fiscal years:
Year 1 Activities--The existing rock seawall would be extended a
minimum of 460 m (1,500 ft) up to a maximum of 1,400 m (4,600 ft)
south. The actual length of seawall extension constructed in Year 1
would be based upon available funding; however, additional lengthening
(up to the 1,400 m [4,600 ft] total length) would be accomplished in
future years as funding becomes available.
Year 2 Activities--Approximately one-third of the sand necessary
for beach nourishment would be placed along the central areas of the
Wallops Island shoreline that are currently reinforced by the rock
seawall. The objective for this first fill cycle would be to restore
the deficit of sand caused by the continual erosion at the base of the
seawall. Sand placement would likely involve removing sand from the
shoal by hopper dredges and pumping the material onto the beach.
Year 3 Activities--The remaining sand needed to complete the beach
nourishment would be placed along the Wallops Island shoreline.
Additionally, under Alternatives Two and Three, the sand retention
structure would be constructed.
Subsequent beach renourishment cycles would vary throughout the
lifecycle of the proposed project. Factors dictating the frequency and
magnitude of such actions would include project performance as revealed
through ongoing monitoring, storm severity and frequency, and
availability of funding. Given the dynamic nature of the ocean
environment, and that exact locations and magnitude of renourishment
cycles may fluctuate, additional NEPA documentation for renourishment
actions may be prepared in the future, as appropriate. For each of the
action alternatives considered in the PEIS, the renourishment cycle is
anticipated to be every five years, totaling nine cycles over the
fifty-year design life of the project.
In addition to the construction activities outlined for each of the
three action alternatives, NASA would implement a rigorous monitoring
program that would begin with construction in Year 1 and continue
throughout the project. The intent of the monitoring program is to
measure the performance of the project, and through adaptive
management, make informed decisions regarding the need for
[[Page 8999]]
renourishment, sand retention structures, and future storm damage
reduction measures.
NASA plans to hold a public meeting to discuss the project and to
solicit comments on the Draft SRIPP PEIS. The public meeting is
currently scheduled for:
Tuesday, March 16, 2010, at the WFF Visitor Information Center,
Route 175, Wallops Island, Virginia, 6 p.m.-9 p.m.
Written public input on environmental issues and concerns
associated with the WFF SRIPP are hereby requested.
Olga M. Dominguez,
Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure.
[FR Doc. 2010-3896 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P