1,2,3-Propanetriol, Homopolymer Diisooctadecanoate; Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance, 8500-8504 [2010-3859]
Download as PDF
8500
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: January 21, 2010.
Walter W. Kovalick Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart K—Ohio
2. Section 52.1870 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(145) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.1870
Identification of plan.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(145) On September 14, 2004, Ohio
submitted modifications to its
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
and nonattainment New Source Review
rules as a revision to the State
implementation plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Ohio Administrative Code Rule
3745–31–01, Definitions: (C), (D), (E),
(J), (M), (N), (O), (P), (Q), (S), (T), (U),
(V), (W), (X), (DD), (EE), (FF), (GG), (JJ),
(MM), (NN), (QQ), (DDD), (EEE), (FFF),
(JJJ), (KKK), (NNN), (UUU), (VVV),
(WWW), (XXX), (YYY), (ZZZ), (CCCC),
(DDDD), (EEEE), (FFFF), (GGGG),
(HHHH), (IIII), (JJJJ), (KKKK), (LLLL),
(MMMM), (OOOO), (PPPP), (QQQQ),
(SSSS), (VVVV), (WWWW), (XXXX),
(ZZZZ), (DDDDD), (EEEEE), (HHHHH),
(KKKKK), (LLLLL), (PPPPP), (QQQQQ),
(UUUUU), and (XXXXX), adopted on
October 18, 2004, effective October 28,
2004.
(B) Ohio Administrative Code Rules
3745–31–01, Definitions: (III) and (SSS),
3745–31–10 ‘‘Air Stationary Source
Obligations.’’, and 3745–31–22
‘‘Nonattainment Provisions—Conditions
for Approval’’, adopted on October 18,
2004, effective October 28, 2004 and
revised by the November 15, 2005 letter
from Joseph P. Koncelik to Thomas
Skinner. This letter, included as
Additional material in paragraph
(145)(ii)(B) below, removes references to
the Pollution Control Project (PCP) and
Clean Unit provisions vacated by a June
24, 2005 DC Circuit Court of Appeals
decision.
(C) Ohio Administrative Code Rules
3745–31–09 ‘‘Air permit to install
completeness determinations, public
participation and public notice.’’, 3745–
31–13 ‘‘Attainment provisions—review
of major stationary sources and major
modifications, stationary source
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:14 Feb 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
applicability and exemptions.’’, 3745–
31–15 ‘‘Attainment provisions—Control
Technology Review.’’, 3745–31–21
‘‘Nonattainment provisions—review of
major stationary sources and major
modifications—stationary source
applicability and exemptions.’’, 3745–
31–24 ‘‘Non-attainment Provisions—
Baseline for Determining Credit for
Emission and Air Quality Offsets.’’,
3745–31–26 ‘‘Nonattainment
Provisions—Offset Ratio
Requirements.’’, and 3745–31–32
‘‘Plantwide applicability limit (PAL).’’,
adopted on October 18, 2004, effective
October 28, 2004.
(D) October 18, 2004, ‘‘Director’s Final
Findings and Orders’’, signed by
Christopher Jones, Director, Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency,
adopting rules 3745–31–01, 3745–31–
09, 3745–31–10, 3745–31–13, 3745–31–
15, 3745–31–21, 3745–31–22, 3745–31–
24, 3745–31–26, 3745–31–30, 3745–31–
31, and 3745–31–32.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Ohio Administrative Code Rule
3745–31–01, Definitions: (ZZZZZ)
adopted on October 18, 2004, effective
October 28, 2004.
(B) Letter dated November 15, 2005,
from Ohio EPA Director Joseph P.
Koncelik to Regional Administrator
Thomas Skinner, titled Request for
Approval of Ohio Administrative Code
(‘‘OAC’’) Chapter 3745–31 NSR Reform
Rule Changes into the State
Implementation Plan (‘‘SIP’’).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–3831 Filed 2–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0213; FRL–8813–8]
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of
triglycerol diisostearate.
DATES: This regulation is effective
February 25, 2010. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before April 26, 2010, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2009–0213. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Fertich, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 347–8560; e-mail address:
fertich.elizabeth@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1,2,3-Propanetriol, Homopolymer
Diisooctadecanoate; Exemption from
the Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of 1,2,3propanetriol, homopolymer
diisooctadecanoate, herein referred to as
triglycerol diisostearate, when used as
an inert ingredient (emulsifier) when
applied to animals. Valent Biosciences
Corporation submitted a petition to EPA
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an
exemption from the requirement of a
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
B. How Can I Get Electronic Access to
Other Related Information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR cite at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the
submission of objections and requests
for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
You must file your objection or request
a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2009–0213 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
on or before April 26, 2010.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your
copies, identified by docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0213, by one of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:14 Feb 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
Facility’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of May 6, 2009
(74 FR 20947) (FRL–8412–7), EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section 408
of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a, announcing
the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
8E7354) by Valent Biosciences
Corporation, 870 Technology Way,
Libertyville, IL 60048. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.930 be
amended by establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of 1,2,3-propanetriol,
homopolymer diisooctadecanoate,
herein referred to as triglycerol
diisostearate. That notice included a
summary of the petition prepared by the
petitioner. There were no comments
received in response to the notice of
filing.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
EPA performs a number of analyses to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide residues. First,
EPA determines the toxicity of
pesticides. Second, EPA examines
exposure to the pesticide through food,
drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients
that are not active ingredients as defined
in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are
not limited to, the following types of
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8501
ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own):
Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as
polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and
diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose;
wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol
dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not
intended to imply nontoxicity; the
ingredient may or may not be
chemically active. Generally, EPA has
exempted inert ingredients from the
requirement of a tolerance based on the
low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)
of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action and considered its validity,
completeness and reliability and the
relationship of this information to
human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the
variability of the sensitivities of major
identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children. The
nature of the toxic effects caused by
triglycerol diisostearate are discussed in
this unit.
The Agency has determined that
triglycerol diisostearate is represented
by the group of chemicals known as
polyglycerol esters of fatty acids. Where
specific information on triglycerol
diisostearate is not available,
information on polyglycerol esters of
fatty acids is used to assess toxicity.
The polyglycerol esters of fatty acids
represent a large group of closely related
compounds with complex
compositions. The individual
components are found as normal
constituents of the human diet, i.e.
glycerol, glycerol mono-, di- and tri-fatty
acid esters and individual fatty acids.
Hydrolysis by enzymes or gastric juices
to form esters and carbon dioxide is the
main pathway for metabolic degradation
for polyglycerol esters of fatty acids.
Acute toxicity studies conducted with
polyglycerol esters of fatty acids in rats
and rabbits show no adverse effects at
doses up to 29 grams/kilogram (g/kg)
body weight. Repeated dose testing in
rats over 5 days did not result in any
deaths at doses up to 10 g/kg body
weight..
In a short-term study, rats were
maintained on 9% polyglycerol ester
(equivalent to 4,500 milligrams/
kilogram/day (mg/kg/day)) and 1%
ground-nut oil for 17 weeks. No
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
8502
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
systemic toxicity was observed in the
study. There were also no adverse
effects noted in a study where rats were
maintained on a diet of 10%
polyglycerol ester (equivalent to 5,000
mg/kg/day) for 90 days. In a third study,
rats were fed a diet containing 15%
polyglycerol ester (equivalent to 7,500
mg/kg/day) of fatty acids for 5 weeks.
No adverse effects were reported during
this study.
In a long-term study, mice were fed a
diet of either 5% polyglycerol ester
(equivalent to 2,500 mg/kg/day) or
ground-nut oil for 80 weeks. All animals
survived the study and no adverse
effects were reported on body weight,
food consumption or peripheral blood
picture. Microscopic examination of all
major organs showed nothing
remarkable. Similar results were
exhibited in a study with rats fed the
same diet for 2 years. In a third study,
mice were maintained on a diet of 1%
polyglycerol ester (equivalent to 500
mg/kg/day) for 15.5 months. There were
no adverse effects noted in this study.
In a reproductive study, rats were fed
a diet containing 1.5% polyglycerol
ester (equivalent to 750 mg/kg/day) for
three generations. There were no
significant effects on fertility or
reproductive performance during the
first year. There were also no consistent,
compound-related abnormalities noted
after gross and histological examination
of the third generation.
No carcinogenicity studies are
available on triglycerol diisostearate,
however, there was no systemic toxicity
observed in mice and rats at doses up
to 2,500 mg/kg/day for 80 weeks and 2
years, respectively.
No neurotoxicity studies are available
in the database; however, there was no
systemic toxicity in mice and rats at
doses up to 2,500 mg/kg/day during
prolonged exposure.
No mutagenicity studies are available,
however, polyglycerol esters of fatty
acids are normal constituents in the
diet. Therefore, there is no concern for
mutagenic effects.
V. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure,
section 408 of FFDCA directs EPA to
consider available information
concerning exposures from the pesticide
residue in food and all other nonoccupational exposures, including
drinking water from ground water or
surface water and exposure through
pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or
buildings (residential and other indoor
uses).
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be clearly
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:14 Feb 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide
chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no
appreciable risks to human health. In
order to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the
toxicity of the inert in conjunction with
possible exposure to residues of the
inert ingredient through food, drinking
water, and through other exposures that
occur as a result of pesticide use in
residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a finite tolerance is not
necessary to ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
inert ingredient, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance may be
established.
The primary route of exposure to
triglycerol diisostearate from its use as
an inert ingredient in pesticide products
would most likely be through
consumption of food to which pesticide
products containing it have been
applied, and possibly through drinking
water (from runoff).
In addition to pesticide use,
triglycerol diisostearate has reported
uses in personal care products, such as
lipstick, lip gloss, sunscreen, makeup,
skin cream and cleanser. There is a
potential exposure via dermal and
inhalation routes based on its use
pattern in personal care products.
No hazard was identified for the acute
and chronic dietary assessment (food
and drinking water), or for the short-,
intermediate-, and long-term residential
assessments, and therefore no aggregate
risk assessments were performed.
VI. Cumulative Effects
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
Unlike other pesticide ingredients for
which EPA has followed as cumulative
risk approach based on a common
mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not
made a common mechanism of toxicity
finding as to triglycerol diisostearate
and any other substances and,
triglycerol diisostearate does not appear
to produce a toxic metabolite produced
by other substances. For the purposes of
this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has
not assumed that triglycerol
diisostearate has a common mechanism
of toxicity with other substances. For
information regarding EPA’s efforts to
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
determine which chemicals have a
common mechanism of toxicity and to
evaluate the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see the policy statements
released by EPA’s Office of Pesticide
Programs concerning common
mechanism determinations and
procedures for cumulating effects from
substances found to have a common
mechanism on EPA’s website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/.
VII. Safety Factor for Infants and
Children
Section 408 of the FFDCA provides
that EPA shall apply an additional
tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants
and children in the case of threshold
effects to account for prenatal and
postnatal toxicity and the completeness
of the database on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines that a different
margin of safety will be safe for infants
and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the
FQPA safety factor (SF). In applying this
provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X or uses a different
additional safety factor when reliable
data to EPA supports the choice of a
different factor.
The Agency has determined that
triglycerol diisostearate is represented
by the group of chemicals known as
polyglycerol esters of fatty acids. Where
specific information on triglycerol
diisostearate is not available,
information on polyglycerol esters of
fatty acids is used to assess toxicity. The
toxicity database is sufficient for
polyglycerol esters of fatty acids and
potential exposure is adequately
characterized given the low toxicity of
the chemical. In terms of hazard, there
are low concerns and no residual
uncertainties regarding prenatal and/or
postnatal toxicity. Polyglycerol esters of
fatty acids have low subchronic and
chronic toxicity. There was no systemic
toxicity in mice and rats at very high
doses for 80 weeks and 2 years
respectively. In a reproductive study
with rats, there were no significant
effects on fertility or reproductive
performance for three generations.
There were also no consistent,
compound-related abnormalities noted
after gross and histological examination
of the third generation. No neurotoxicity
studies are available, but there were no
signs of neurological effects observed in
the database at high doses. Therefore,
the Agency concluded that the
developmental neurotoxicity study is
not required. No immunotoxicity study
is available, however, no systemic
toxicity was observed in mice and rats
at high doses. In addition, no hazard has
been identified following exposure to
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
triglycerol diisostearate. Based on this
information, there is no concern at this
time for increased sensitivity to infants
and children to triglycerol diisostearate
when used as an inert ingredient in
pesticide formulations and a safety
factor analysis has not been used to
assess risk. For the same reason, EPA
has determined that an additional safety
factor is not needed to protect the safety
of infants and children.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
VIII. Determination of Safety
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be demonstrated that
the risks from aggregate exposure to
pesticide chemical residues under
reasonably foreseeable circumstances
will pose no appreciable risks to human
health. In order to determine the risks
from aggregate exposure to pesticide
inert ingredients, the Agency considers
the toxicity of the inert in conjunction
with possible exposure to residues of
the inert ingredient through food,
drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings. If
EPA is able to determine that a finite
tolerance is not necessary to ensure that
there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance may be established.
Residues of concern are not
anticipated from dietary exposure (food
and drinking water) or for residential
exposure from the use of triglycerol
diisostearate for the proposed use
pattern as an inert ingredient
(emulsifier) in pesticide formulations
applied to animals. A quantitative
dietary risk or residential risk
assessment was not performed since no
endpoint of concern was identified in
the database.
Taking into consideration all available
information on triglycerol diisostearate,
EPA concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the
general population or to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to
triglycerol diisostearate. Therefore, the
establishment of an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance under 40 CFR
180.930 for residues of triglycerol
diisostearate when used as an inert
ingredient (emulsifier) in pesticide
formulations applied to animals can be
considered safe under section 408 of the
FFDCA.
IX. Other Considerations
A. Endocrine Disruptors
EPA is required under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:14 Feb 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
as amended by FQPA, to develop a
screening program to determine whether
certain substances (including all
pesticide active and other ingredients)
‘‘may have an effect in humans that is
similar to an effect produced by a
naturally occurring estrogen, or other
such endocrine effects as the
Administrator may designate.’’
Following recommendations of its
Endocrine Disruptor and Testing
Advisory Committee (EDSTAC), EPA
determined that there was a scientific
basis for including, as part of the
program, the androgen and thyroid
hormone systems, in addition to the
estrogen hormone system. EPA also
adopted EDSTAC’s recommendation
that the Program include evaluations of
potential effects in wildlife. For
pesticide chemicals, EPA will use
FIFRA and, to the extent that effects in
wildlife may help determine whether a
substance may have an effect in
humans, FFDCA authority to require the
wildlife evaluations. As the science
develops and resources allow, screening
of additional hormone systems may be
added to the Endocrine Disruptor
Screening Program (EDSP).
When additional appropriate
screening and/or testing protocols being
considered under the Agency’s EDSP
have been developed, triglycerol
diisostearate may be subjected to further
screening and/or testing to better
characterize effects related to endocrine
disruption.
B. Analytical Method
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
without any numerical limitation.
C. International Tolerances
The Agency is not aware of any
country requiring a tolerance for
triglycerol diisostearate nor have any
CODEX Maximum Residue Levels
(MRLs) been established for any food
crops at this time.
X. Conclusions
Based on the information in this
preamble, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty of no harm from
aggregate exposure to residues of
triglycerol diisostearate. Accordingly,
EPA finds that exempting triglycerol
diisostearate from the requirement of a
tolerance will be safe.
XI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
under section 408(d) of FFDCA in
response to a petition submitted to the
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8503
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this final rule
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Public Law 104–4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
8504
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
XII. Congressional Review Act
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
Dated: February 19, 2010.
Meredith F. Laws,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
*
*
§ 180.930 Inert ingredients applied to
animals; exemptions from the requirement
of a tolerance.
*
*
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0749; FRL–8799–4]
Trichoderma gamsii strain ICC 080;
Exemption from the Requirement of a
Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of the
Trichoderma gamsii strain ICC 080 on
all food/feed commodities when applied
preharvest in accordance with good
agricultural practices. Isagro, S.p.A.
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), requesting an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of Trichoderma gamsii
strain ICC 080.
DATES: This regulation is effective
February 25, 2010. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before April 26, 2010, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
*
*
Emulsifier
*
*
*
EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2008–0749. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susanne Cerrelli, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–8077; e-mail address:
cerrelli.susanne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Uses
*
ADDRESSES:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
2. In §180.930, the table is amended
by adding alphabetically the following
inert ingredient to read as follows:
■
Limits
[FR Doc. 2010–3859 Filed 2–24–10; 8:45 am]
Jkt 220001
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
*
*
1,2,3-Propanetriol, homopolymer diisooctadecanoate (CAS Reg.
No. 63705–03–3)
*
*
16:14 Feb 24, 2010
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
■
Inert ingredients
VerDate Nov<24>2008
PART 180—[AMENDED]
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. The EPA procedural
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8500-8504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3859]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0213; FRL-8813-8]
1,2,3-Propanetriol, Homopolymer Diisooctadecanoate; Exemption
from the Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of 1,2,3-propanetriol, homopolymer
diisooctadecanoate, herein referred to as triglycerol diisostearate,
when used as an inert ingredient (emulsifier) when applied to animals.
Valent Biosciences Corporation submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of
triglycerol diisostearate.
DATES: This regulation is effective February 25, 2010. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before April 26, 2010, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0213. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Fertich, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 347-8560; e-mail address:
fertich.elizabeth@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be
[[Page 8501]]
affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this
unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you
and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain
entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Electronic Access to Other Related Information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR cite at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which
govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in
40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or request a hearing on
this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0213 in the subject line on the first page of
your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or
delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before April 26, 2010.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0213, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of May 6, 2009 (74 FR 20947) (FRL-8412-7),
EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408 of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a,
announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 8E7354) by Valent
Biosciences Corporation, 870 Technology Way, Libertyville, IL 60048.
The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.930 be amended by establishing
an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of 1,2,3-
propanetriol, homopolymer diisooctadecanoate, herein referred to as
triglycerol diisostearate. That notice included a summary of the
petition prepared by the petitioner. There were no comments received in
response to the notice of filing.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue. . . .''
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the
toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. The nature of the toxic effects caused by
triglycerol diisostearate are discussed in this unit.
The Agency has determined that triglycerol diisostearate is
represented by the group of chemicals known as polyglycerol esters of
fatty acids. Where specific information on triglycerol diisostearate is
not available, information on polyglycerol esters of fatty acids is
used to assess toxicity.
The polyglycerol esters of fatty acids represent a large group of
closely related compounds with complex compositions. The individual
components are found as normal constituents of the human diet, i.e.
glycerol, glycerol mono-, di- and tri-fatty acid esters and individual
fatty acids. Hydrolysis by enzymes or gastric juices to form esters and
carbon dioxide is the main pathway for metabolic degradation for
polyglycerol esters of fatty acids.
Acute toxicity studies conducted with polyglycerol esters of fatty
acids in rats and rabbits show no adverse effects at doses up to 29
grams/kilogram (g/kg) body weight. Repeated dose testing in rats over 5
days did not result in any deaths at doses up to 10 g/kg body weight..
In a short-term study, rats were maintained on 9% polyglycerol
ester (equivalent to 4,500 milligrams/kilogram/day (mg/kg/day)) and 1%
ground-nut oil for 17 weeks. No
[[Page 8502]]
systemic toxicity was observed in the study. There were also no adverse
effects noted in a study where rats were maintained on a diet of 10%
polyglycerol ester (equivalent to 5,000 mg/kg/day) for 90 days. In a
third study, rats were fed a diet containing 15% polyglycerol ester
(equivalent to 7,500 mg/kg/day) of fatty acids for 5 weeks. No adverse
effects were reported during this study.
In a long-term study, mice were fed a diet of either 5%
polyglycerol ester (equivalent to 2,500 mg/kg/day) or ground-nut oil
for 80 weeks. All animals survived the study and no adverse effects
were reported on body weight, food consumption or peripheral blood
picture. Microscopic examination of all major organs showed nothing
remarkable. Similar results were exhibited in a study with rats fed the
same diet for 2 years. In a third study, mice were maintained on a diet
of 1% polyglycerol ester (equivalent to 500 mg/kg/day) for 15.5 months.
There were no adverse effects noted in this study.
In a reproductive study, rats were fed a diet containing 1.5%
polyglycerol ester (equivalent to 750 mg/kg/day) for three generations.
There were no significant effects on fertility or reproductive
performance during the first year. There were also no consistent,
compound-related abnormalities noted after gross and histological
examination of the third generation.
No carcinogenicity studies are available on triglycerol
diisostearate, however, there was no systemic toxicity observed in mice
and rats at doses up to 2,500 mg/kg/day for 80 weeks and 2 years,
respectively.
No neurotoxicity studies are available in the database; however,
there was no systemic toxicity in mice and rats at doses up to 2,500
mg/kg/day during prolonged exposure.
No mutagenicity studies are available, however, polyglycerol esters
of fatty acids are normal constituents in the diet. Therefore, there is
no concern for mutagenic effects.
V. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure, section 408 of FFDCA directs EPA
to consider available information concerning exposures from the
pesticide residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures,
including drinking water from ground water or surface water and
exposure through pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings
(residential and other indoor uses).
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human
health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to
pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the
inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert
ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other exposures
that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA
is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance may be established.
The primary route of exposure to triglycerol diisostearate from its
use as an inert ingredient in pesticide products would most likely be
through consumption of food to which pesticide products containing it
have been applied, and possibly through drinking water (from runoff).
In addition to pesticide use, triglycerol diisostearate has
reported uses in personal care products, such as lipstick, lip gloss,
sunscreen, makeup, skin cream and cleanser. There is a potential
exposure via dermal and inhalation routes based on its use pattern in
personal care products.
No hazard was identified for the acute and chronic dietary
assessment (food and drinking water), or for the short-, intermediate-,
and long-term residential assessments, and therefore no aggregate risk
assessments were performed.
VI. Cumulative Effects
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFFDCA requires that, when considering
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency
consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of
a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a
common mechanism of toxicity.''
Unlike other pesticide ingredients for which EPA has followed as
cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA
has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to triglycerol
diisostearate and any other substances and, triglycerol diisostearate
does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other
substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA
has not assumed that triglycerol diisostearate has a common mechanism
of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA's
efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of
toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see
the policy statements released by EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs
concerning common mechanism determinations and procedures for
cumulating effects from substances found to have a common mechanism on
EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/.
VII. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
Section 408 of the FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in
the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines that a different margin of safety will be safe
for infants and children. This additional margin of safety is commonly
referred to as the FQPA safety factor (SF). In applying this provision,
EPA either retains the default value of 10X or uses a different
additional safety factor when reliable data to EPA supports the choice
of a different factor.
The Agency has determined that triglycerol diisostearate is
represented by the group of chemicals known as polyglycerol esters of
fatty acids. Where specific information on triglycerol diisostearate is
not available, information on polyglycerol esters of fatty acids is
used to assess toxicity. The toxicity database is sufficient for
polyglycerol esters of fatty acids and potential exposure is adequately
characterized given the low toxicity of the chemical. In terms of
hazard, there are low concerns and no residual uncertainties regarding
prenatal and/or postnatal toxicity. Polyglycerol esters of fatty acids
have low subchronic and chronic toxicity. There was no systemic
toxicity in mice and rats at very high doses for 80 weeks and 2 years
respectively. In a reproductive study with rats, there were no
significant effects on fertility or reproductive performance for three
generations. There were also no consistent, compound-related
abnormalities noted after gross and histological examination of the
third generation. No neurotoxicity studies are available, but there
were no signs of neurological effects observed in the database at high
doses. Therefore, the Agency concluded that the developmental
neurotoxicity study is not required. No immunotoxicity study is
available, however, no systemic toxicity was observed in mice and rats
at high doses. In addition, no hazard has been identified following
exposure to
[[Page 8503]]
triglycerol diisostearate. Based on this information, there is no
concern at this time for increased sensitivity to infants and children
to triglycerol diisostearate when used as an inert ingredient in
pesticide formulations and a safety factor analysis has not been used
to assess risk. For the same reason, EPA has determined that an
additional safety factor is not needed to protect the safety of infants
and children.
VIII. Determination of Safety
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human
health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to
pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the
inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert
ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other exposures
that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA
is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance may be established.
Residues of concern are not anticipated from dietary exposure (food
and drinking water) or for residential exposure from the use of
triglycerol diisostearate for the proposed use pattern as an inert
ingredient (emulsifier) in pesticide formulations applied to animals. A
quantitative dietary risk or residential risk assessment was not
performed since no endpoint of concern was identified in the database.
Taking into consideration all available information on triglycerol
diisostearate, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to the general population or to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to triglycerol diisostearate.
Therefore, the establishment of an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance under 40 CFR 180.930 for residues of triglycerol
diisostearate when used as an inert ingredient (emulsifier) in
pesticide formulations applied to animals can be considered safe under
section 408 of the FFDCA.
IX. Other Considerations
A. Endocrine Disruptors
EPA is required under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), as amended by FQPA, to develop a screening program to
determine whether certain substances (including all pesticide active
and other ingredients) ``may have an effect in humans that is similar
to an effect produced by a naturally occurring estrogen, or other such
endocrine effects as the Administrator may designate.'' Following
recommendations of its Endocrine Disruptor and Testing Advisory
Committee (EDSTAC), EPA determined that there was a scientific basis
for including, as part of the program, the androgen and thyroid hormone
systems, in addition to the estrogen hormone system. EPA also adopted
EDSTAC's recommendation that the Program include evaluations of
potential effects in wildlife. For pesticide chemicals, EPA will use
FIFRA and, to the extent that effects in wildlife may help determine
whether a substance may have an effect in humans, FFDCA authority to
require the wildlife evaluations. As the science develops and resources
allow, screening of additional hormone systems may be added to the
Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP).
When additional appropriate screening and/or testing protocols
being considered under the Agency's EDSP have been developed,
triglycerol diisostearate may be subjected to further screening and/or
testing to better characterize effects related to endocrine disruption.
B. Analytical Method
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical limitation.
C. International Tolerances
The Agency is not aware of any country requiring a tolerance for
triglycerol diisostearate nor have any CODEX Maximum Residue Levels
(MRLs) been established for any food crops at this time.
X. Conclusions
Based on the information in this preamble, EPA concludes that there
is a reasonable certainty of no harm from aggregate exposure to
residues of triglycerol diisostearate. Accordingly, EPA finds that
exempting triglycerol diisostearate from the requirement of a tolerance
will be safe.
XI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition,
this final rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section
[[Page 8504]]
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
XII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 19, 2010.
Meredith F. Laws,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.930, the table is amended by adding alphabetically the
following inert ingredient to read as follows:
Sec. 180.930 Inert ingredients applied to animals; exemptions from
the requirement of a tolerance.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inert ingredients Limits Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
1,2,3-Propanetriol, homopolymer Emulsifier
diisooctadecanoate (CAS Reg.
No. 63705-03-3)
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2010-3859 Filed 2-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S