Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-1A11 (CL-600), CL-600-2A12 (CL-601), and CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R, and CL-604) Airplanes, 8461-8465 [2010-3463]
Download as PDF
8461
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 37
Thursday, February 25, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1021; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–054–AD; Amendment
39–16217; AD 2009–06–05 R1]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Model CL–600–1A11 (CL–600), CL–
600–2A12 (CL–601), and CL–600–2B16
(CL–601–3A, CL–601–3R, and CL–604)
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are revising an existing
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
[S]everal cases of wing anti-ice piccolo
duct failure reported on CL–600–2B19 (CRJ)
aircraft. Although there have been no failures
reported on Challenger aircraft, similar ducts
are installed on the * * * [other] Challenger
models.
*
*
*
*
*
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Cracking of the wing anti-ice piccolo ducts
could result in air leakage, with an adverse
effect on the anti-ice air distribution pattern
and a possible unannunciated insufficient
heat condition. * * *
The unsafe condition is anti-ice
system air leakage with a possible
adverse effect on the anti-ice air
distribution pattern and anti-ice
capability without annunciation to the
flightcrew, and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane. We are
issuing this AD to require actions to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:14 Feb 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
correct the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective April
1, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of April 1, 2010.
On April 28, 2009 (74 FR 12225,
March 24, 2009), the Director of the
Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain
other publications listed in this AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Parrillo, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
and Mechanical Systems, ANE–171,
FAA, New York Aircraft Certification
Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone
(516) 228–7305; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to revise an existing AD that
applies to certain Model CL–600–1A11
(CL–600), CL–600–2A12 (CL–601), and
CL–600–2B16 (CL–601–3A, CL–601–3R,
and CL–604) airplanes. That NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on
November 5, 2009 (74 FR 57273), and
proposed to revise AD 2009–06–05,
Amendment 39–15841 (74 FR 12225,
March 24, 2009). That AD required
actions intended to address an unsafe
condition for the products listed above.
Actions Since Issuance of AD 2009–06–
05
Since we issued AD 2009–06–05,
Bombardier requested that we change
paragraphs (f)(2) and (f)(4) of AD 2009–
06–05 to allow compliance within 2,000
flight hours or 60 months after the
effective date of the AD, whichever
occurs first, instead of prior to the
accumulation of 2,000 total flight hours
or within 60 months after the effective
date of the AD, whichever occurs first.
We agreed and proposed to revise
paragraphs (f)(2) and (f)(4) of AD 2009–
06–05 accordingly in the NPRM. The
compliance time matches the intent of
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA)
AD CF–2008–18, dated May 9, 2008,
and represents the maximum interval of
time allowable for the affected airplanes
to operate safely.
Bombardier also requested that we
change Table 2 of AD 2009–06–05 to
replace references to two temporary
revisions (TRs): Canadair TR 600/23,
dated August 16, 2006, to the Canadair
Challenger Model CL–600–1A11
Airplane Flight Manual (AFM); and
Canadair TR 600–1/19, dated August 16,
2006, to the Canadair Challenger Model
CL–600–1A11 AFM (Winglets). These
two TRs are approved by TCCA, and
should be replaced in AD 2009–06–05
with references to the following FAAapproved TRs: Canadair TR 600/22,
dated August 16, 2006, to the Canadair
Challenger Model CL–600–1A11 AFM;
and Canadair TR 600–1/17, dated
August 16, 2006, to the Canadair
Challenger Model CL–600–1A11 AFM
(Winglets). We agreed and proposed to
revise Table 2 of AD 2009–06–05
accordingly in the NPRM.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Explanation of Change Made to the
Manufacturer Name
We have revised this AD to identify
the legal name of the manufacturer as
published in the most recent type
certificate data sheet for the affected
airplane models.
Explanation of Change to the
Alternative Methods of Compliance
We have revised the ‘‘Alternative
Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)’’
paragraph (g)(1) in this AD to specify
the current contact information.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the
AD.
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
8462
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
Explanation of Change to Costs of
Compliance
Since issuance of the NPRM, we have
increased the labor rate used in the
Costs of Compliance from $80 per workhour to $85 per work-hour. The Costs of
Compliance information, below, reflects
this increase in the specified hourly
labor rate.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
about 108 products of U.S. registry.
The actions that are required by AD
2009–06–05 and retained in this AD
take about 37 work-hours per product,
at an average labor rate of $85 per work
hour. Required parts cost about $0 per
product. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the currently required
actions is $339,660, or $3,145 per
product.
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–15841 (74 FR
12225, March 24, 2009) and adding the
following new AD:
■
2009–06–05R1 Bombardier, Inc.:
Amendment 39–16217. Docket No.
FAA–2009–1021; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–054–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective April 1, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD revises AD 2009–06–05,
Amendment 39–15841.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes
identified in Table 1, paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2),
(c)(3), and (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in
any category.
TABLE 1—AIRPLANES AFFECTED BY THIS AD
Bombardier, Inc. model
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
CL–600–1A11
CL–600–2A12
CL–600–2B16
CL–600–2B16
(CL–600) airplanes .....................................................................................................
(CL–601) airplanes .....................................................................................................
(CL–601–3A & CL–601–3R) airplanes .......................................................................
(CL–604) airplanes .....................................................................................................
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 30: Ice and Rain Protection.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
There have been several cases of wing antiice piccolo duct failure reported on CL–600–
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Serial Nos.
17:57 Feb 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
2B19 (CRJ) aircraft. Although there have been
no failures reported on Challenger aircraft,
similar ducts are installed on the * * *
[other] Challenger models.
Upon investigation, it has been determined
that ducts manufactured since June 2000, and
installed since 1 August 2000, are susceptible
to cracking due to the process used to drill
the holes in the ducts. These ducts were
installed on CL–600–2B16 aircraft, serial
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1004
3001
5001
5301
through
through
through
through
1085
3066
5194
5635
inclusive.
inclusive.
inclusive.
inclusive.
numbers 5469 through 5635 in production,
but may also have been installed as
replacements on CL–600–1A11, CL–600–
2A12 and other CL–600–2B16 aircraft.
Cracking of the wing anti-ice piccolo ducts
could result in air leakage, with an adverse
effect on the anti-ice air distribution pattern
and a possible unannunciated insufficient
heat condition. As a result, the airplane flight
manual (AFM) instructions have been revised
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
to provide proper annunciation of an
insufficient heat condition, utilizing existing
messages and indications, with instructions,
to the pilot, to leave icing conditions if
sufficient heat cannot be achieved or
maintained.
This directive mandates the amendment of
the AFM procedures, in addition to checking
the part numbers and serial numbers of the
installed wing anti-ice piccolo ducts and
replacing them as necessary.
The unsafe condition is anti-ice system air
leakage with a possible adverse effect on the
anti-ice air distribution pattern and anti-ice
capability without annunciation to the
flightcrew, and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) For airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4) of this AD:
8463
Within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD, revise the Normal and Abnormal
Procedures sections of the applicable
Canadair Challenger Airplane Flight Manual
(AFM) by inserting a copy of the applicable
temporary revision (TR) listed in Table 2 of
this AD. When the information in the
applicable TR is included in the general
revisions of the AFM, the general revisions
may be inserted in the AFM, as applicable,
and the TR may be removed.
TABLE 2—TEMPORARY REVISIONS
Canadair TR—
Dated—
To the—
(i) 600/22 .........................................
(ii) 600–1/17 ....................................
(iii) 601/14 .......................................
August 16, 2006 ............................
August 16, 2006 ............................
August 16, 2006 ............................
(iv) 601/15 .......................................
(v) 601/19 ........................................
(vi) 601/26 .......................................
(vii) 601/27 ......................................
(viii) 601/27 ......................................
(ix) 604/20 .......................................
August 16, 2006 ............................
August 16, 2006 ............................
August 16, 2006 ............................
August 16, 2006 ............................
August 16, 2006 ............................
April 17, 2006 ................................
Canadair Challenger Model CL–600–1A11 AFM.
Canadair Challenger Model CL–600–1A11 AFM (Winglets).
Canadair Challenger Model CL–600–2A12 AFM, Product Support
Publication (PSP) 601–1B–1.
Canadair Challenger Model CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1A–1.
Canadair Challenger Model CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1B.
Canadair Challenger Model CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1.
Canadair Challenger Model CL–600–2A12 AFM.
Canadair Challenger Model CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1–1.
Canadair Challenger Model CL–604 AFM, PSP 604–1.
(2) For airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD, and for
Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604) airplanes,
serial numbers 5301 through 5468 inclusive:
Within 2,000 flight hours or 60 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, review the airplane maintenance
records to determine if any anti-ice piccolo
ducts or complete leading edge sections were
replaced on or after August 1, 2000.
(3) For airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD, and for
Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604) airplanes,
serial numbers 5301 through 5468 inclusive:
If, during the accomplishment of the action
required by paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, it is
determined that any anti-ice piccolo duct has
been replaced on or after August 1, 2000,
before further flight, inspect to determine if
any affected serial number identified in
paragraph 2.C. of the applicable service
bulletin listed in Table 3 of this AD is
installed. A review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if the serial number of the duct
can be conclusively determined from that
review. If any affected serial number is
installed, before further flight, replace the
piccolo duct with a serviceable piccolo duct
that does not have a serial number identified
in paragraph 2.C. of the applicable service
bulletin listed in Table 3 of this AD. Do all
actions in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin listed in Table 3
of this AD.
TABLE 3—SERVICE BULLETINS
Bombardier
Service
Bulletin—
Model—
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
(i) CL–600–1A11 (CL–600) airplanes ..........................................
(ii) CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes .........................................
(iii) CL–600–2B16 (CL–601–3A, CL–601–3R) airplanes ............
(iv) CL–600–2B16 (CL–604) airplanes ........................................
(4) For Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604)
airplanes, serial numbers 5469 through 5635
inclusive: Within 2,000 flight hours or 60
months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, inspect the anti-ice
piccolo ducts to determine if any affected
serial number identified in paragraph 2.C. of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 604–30–003,
Revision 01, dated January 21, 2008, is
installed. If any affected serial number is
installed, before further flight, replace the
piccolo duct with a serviceable piccolo duct
that does not have a serial number identified
in paragraph 2.C. of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 604–30–003, Revision 01, dated
January 21, 2008. Do all actions in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
604–30–003, Revision 01, dated January 21,
2008.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:14 Feb 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
600–0734
601–0585
601–0585
604–30–003
Revision—
Dated—
Original .....................................
Original .....................................
Original .....................................
01 .............................................
November 30, 2006.
November 30, 2006.
November 30, 2006.
January 21, 2008.
(5) As of April 28, 2009 (the effective date
of AD 2009–06–05), no person may install on
any airplane an anti-ice piccolo duct with a
serial number identified in paragraph 2.C. of
the applicable service bulletin identified in
Table 3 of this AD.
(6) Actions done before April 28, 2009, in
accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin
604–30–003, dated November 30, 2006, are
acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding actions in this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, ANE–170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–
794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal
avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or
lacking a principal inspector, your local
Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
8464
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Table 2 and Table 3 of this AD, for related
information.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2008–18, dated May 9, 2008,
and the service information identified in
(i) You must use the service information
specified in Table 4 and Table 5 of this AD,
as applicable, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
Material Incorporated by Reference
TABLE 4—SERVICE BULLETINS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Bombardier Service Bulletin—
Revision—
Dated—
600–0734 ........................................
601–0585 ........................................
604–30–003 ....................................
Original ..........................................
Original ..........................................
01 ...................................................
November 30, 2006.
November 30, 2006.
January 21, 2008.
TABLE 5—TEMPORARY REVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Canadair TR—
Dated—
To the—
600/22 ..................................................
August 16, 2006 .................................
600–1/17 ..............................................
601/14 ..................................................
August 16, 2006 .................................
August 16, 2006 .................................
601/15 ..................................................
August 16, 2006 .................................
601/19
601/26
601/27
601/27
August
August
August
August
Canadair Challenger
ual (AFM).
Canadair Challenger
Canadair Challenger
1.
Canadair Challenger
1.
Canadair Challenger
Canadair Challenger
Canadair Challenger
Canadair Challenger
1.
Canadair Challenger
..................................................
..................................................
..................................................
..................................................
604/20 ..................................................
16,
16,
16,
16,
2006
2006
2006
2006
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
April 17, 2006 .....................................
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
the service information contained in Table 6
Model CL–600–1A11 Airplane Flight ManModel CL–600–1A11 AFM (Winglets).
Model CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1B–
Model CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1A–
Model CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1B.
Model CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1.
Model CL–600–2A12 AFM.
Model CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1–
Model CL–604 AFM, PSP 604–1.
of this AD under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
TABLE 6—NEW MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Canadair TR—
Dated—
To the—
600/22 .............................................
600–1/17 .........................................
August 16, 2006 ............................
August 16, 2006 ............................
Canadair Challenger Model CL–600–1A11 AFM.
Canadair Challenger Model CL–600–1A11 AFM (Winglets).
(2) The Director of the Federal Register
previously approved the incorporation by
reference of the service information
contained in Table 7 and Table 8 of this AD
on April 28, 2009 (74 FR 12225, March 24,
2009).
TABLE 7—SERVICE BULLETINS PREVIOUSLY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Bombardier Service Bulletin—
Revision—
Dated—
600—0734 .......................................
601–0585 ........................................
604–30–003 ....................................
Original ..........................................
Original ..........................................
01 ...................................................
November 30, 2006.
November 30, 2006.
January 21, 2008.
TABLE 8—TEMPORARY REVISIONS PREVIOUSLY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Dated—
To the—
601/14 ..................................................
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Canadair TR—
August 16, 2006 .................................
601/15 ..................................................
August 16, 2006 .................................
601/19
601/26
601/27
601/27
..................................................
..................................................
..................................................
..................................................
August
August
August
August
Canadair
1.
Canadair
1.
Canadair
Canadair
Canadair
Canadair
1.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:14 Feb 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
16,
16,
16,
16,
PO 00000
2006
2006
2006
2006
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Challenger Model CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1B–
Challenger Model CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1A–
Challenger
Challenger
Challenger
Challenger
Model CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1B.
Model CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1.
Model CL–600–2A12 AFM.
Model CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1–
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
8465
TABLE 8—TEMPORARY REVISIONS PREVIOUSLY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE—Continued
Canadair TR—
Dated—
To the—
604/20 ..................................................
April 17, 2006 .....................................
Canadair Challenger Model CL–604 AFM, PSP 604–1.
(3) For service information identified in
ˆ
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote´
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514–
855–7401; e-mail
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com.
(4) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(5) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
16, 2010.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–3463 Filed 2–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0783; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–081–AD; Amendment
39–16213; AD 2010–05–04]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell
Douglas Corporation Model MD–90–30
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Model MD–90–30 airplanes. This AD
requires repetitive inspections for
cracking of the overwing frames at
stations 883, 902, 924, 943, and 962, left
and right sides, and corrective actions if
necessary. This AD results from reports
of cracked overwing frames. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
such cracking, which could sever the
frame, increase the loading of adjacent
frames, and result in damage to adjacent
structure and loss of overall structural
integrity of the airplane.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
16:14 Feb 24, 2010
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger Durbin, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California 90712–4137; telephone (562)
627–5233; fax (562) 627–5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
DATES: This AD is effective April 1,
2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of April 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, 3855
Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800–0019,
Long Beach, California 90846–0001;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 2;
fax 206–766–5683; e-mail
dse.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Jkt 220001
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that would apply to all
Model MD–90–30 airplanes. That NPRM
was published in the Federal Register
on September 4, 2009 (74 FR 45785).
That NPRM proposed to require
repetitive inspections for cracking of the
overwing frames at stations 883, 902,
924, 943, and 962, left and right sides,
and corrective actions if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
considered the comments received from
the sole commenter.
Request To Revise Wording in the
Summary Section and Unsafe
Condition Paragraph of the NPRM
The Boeing Company requests that we
revise the wording of the precipitating
event in the Summary section and
Unsafe Condition paragraph of the
NPRM to clarify that the reported
cracking was found on Model MD–80
airplanes, and that frames of the same
design are installed on Model MD–90
airplanes. The commenter explains that
the proposed revision will be in line
with the first paragraph of the
‘‘Discussion’’ section of the NPRM. The
commenter asserts that otherwise, the
Summary section and paragraph (e) of
the NPRM read that ‘‘Model MD–90
overwing frames have cracked,’’ which
is not the case.
We agree that clarification might be
necessary. While the commenter’s
proposed revision is more precise with
respect to the history of the service
difficulties, the Summary section of ADs
is designed to provide only a brief
description of the action being
proposed. Likewise, the Unsafe
Condition paragraph in the regulatory
text of an AD is meant to be only a brief
statement. Detailed background
information is provided in the
Discussion section of a proposed AD.
We addressed the issues raised by the
commenter in the Discussion section of
the NPRM. That section is not restated
in this final rule. We have not changed
the AD in this regard.
Request To Revise Wording in the
Discussion Section of the NPRM
The Boeing Company requests that we
revise the first sentence of the second
paragraph of the ‘‘Discussion’’ section of
the NPRM to read, ‘‘The cracked
overwing frames on McDonnell Douglas
Model MD–90–30 airplanes have the
same design as those installed on Model
MD–80 series airplanes.’’ The
commenter explains that the proposed
revision sounds more logical than how
it reads in the NPRM and that the issue
is the Model MD–90 frames cracking,
not the Model MD–80 frames.
We agree that clarification is needed.
The proposed revision would indicate
that we have reports of cracks on Model
MD–90–30 airplanes, which is not the
case. As stated in the NPRM, the reports
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8461-8465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3463]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 8461]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-1021; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-054-AD;
Amendment 39-16217; AD 2009-06-05 R1]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-1A11 (CL-
600), CL-600-2A12 (CL-601), and CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R, and
CL-604) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are revising an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
[S]everal cases of wing anti-ice piccolo duct failure reported
on CL-600-2B19 (CRJ) aircraft. Although there have been no failures
reported on Challenger aircraft, similar ducts are installed on the
* * * [other] Challenger models.
* * * * *
Cracking of the wing anti-ice piccolo ducts could result in air
leakage, with an adverse effect on the anti-ice air distribution
pattern and a possible unannunciated insufficient heat condition. *
* *
The unsafe condition is anti-ice system air leakage with a possible
adverse effect on the anti-ice air distribution pattern and anti-ice
capability without annunciation to the flightcrew, and consequent
reduced controllability of the airplane. We are issuing this AD to
require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective April 1, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of April 1,
2010.
On April 28, 2009 (74 FR 12225, March 24, 2009), the Director of
the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain
other publications listed in this AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Parrillo, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7305; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to revise an existing AD that applies to certain Model CL-600-
1A11 (CL-600), CL-600-2A12 (CL-601), and CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-
601-3R, and CL-604) airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on November 5, 2009 (74 FR 57273), and proposed to revise AD
2009-06-05, Amendment 39-15841 (74 FR 12225, March 24, 2009). That AD
required actions intended to address an unsafe condition for the
products listed above.
Actions Since Issuance of AD 2009-06-05
Since we issued AD 2009-06-05, Bombardier requested that we change
paragraphs (f)(2) and (f)(4) of AD 2009-06-05 to allow compliance
within 2,000 flight hours or 60 months after the effective date of the
AD, whichever occurs first, instead of prior to the accumulation of
2,000 total flight hours or within 60 months after the effective date
of the AD, whichever occurs first. We agreed and proposed to revise
paragraphs (f)(2) and (f)(4) of AD 2009-06-05 accordingly in the NPRM.
The compliance time matches the intent of Transport Canada Civil
Aviation (TCCA) AD CF-2008-18, dated May 9, 2008, and represents the
maximum interval of time allowable for the affected airplanes to
operate safely.
Bombardier also requested that we change Table 2 of AD 2009-06-05
to replace references to two temporary revisions (TRs): Canadair TR
600/23, dated August 16, 2006, to the Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-
1A11 Airplane Flight Manual (AFM); and Canadair TR 600-1/19, dated
August 16, 2006, to the Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-1A11 AFM
(Winglets). These two TRs are approved by TCCA, and should be replaced
in AD 2009-06-05 with references to the following FAA-approved TRs:
Canadair TR 600/22, dated August 16, 2006, to the Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-1A11 AFM; and Canadair TR 600-1/17, dated August 16, 2006,
to the Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-1A11 AFM (Winglets). We agreed
and proposed to revise Table 2 of AD 2009-06-05 accordingly in the
NPRM.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Explanation of Change Made to the Manufacturer Name
We have revised this AD to identify the legal name of the
manufacturer as published in the most recent type certificate data
sheet for the affected airplane models.
Explanation of Change to the Alternative Methods of Compliance
We have revised the ``Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)''
paragraph (g)(1) in this AD to specify the current contact information.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described
previously. We determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
[[Page 8462]]
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Explanation of Change to Costs of Compliance
Since issuance of the NPRM, we have increased the labor rate used
in the Costs of Compliance from $80 per work-hour to $85 per work-hour.
The Costs of Compliance information, below, reflects this increase in
the specified hourly labor rate.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect about 108 products of U.S.
registry.
The actions that are required by AD 2009-06-05 and retained in this
AD take about 37 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of
$85 per work hour. Required parts cost about $0 per product. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the currently required actions is
$339,660, or $3,145 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15841 (74 FR
12225, March 24, 2009) and adding the following new AD:
2009-06-05R1 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16217. Docket No. FAA-
2009-1021; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-054-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective April 1,
2010.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD revises AD 2009-06-05, Amendment 39-15841.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes identified in Table 1,
paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4) of this AD,
certificated in any category.
Table 1--Airplanes Affected by This AD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier, Inc. model Serial Nos.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes.......... 1004 through 1085 inclusive.
(2) CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes.......... 3001 through 3066 inclusive.
(3) CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A & CL-601-3R) 5001 through 5194 inclusive.
airplanes.
(4) CL-600-2B16 (CL-604) airplanes.......... 5301 through 5635 inclusive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 30: Ice and
Rain Protection.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
There have been several cases of wing anti-ice piccolo duct
failure reported on CL-600-2B19 (CRJ) aircraft. Although there have
been no failures reported on Challenger aircraft, similar ducts are
installed on the * * * [other] Challenger models.
Upon investigation, it has been determined that ducts
manufactured since June 2000, and installed since 1 August 2000, are
susceptible to cracking due to the process used to drill the holes
in the ducts. These ducts were installed on CL-600-2B16 aircraft,
serial numbers 5469 through 5635 in production, but may also have
been installed as replacements on CL-600-1A11, CL-600-2A12 and other
CL-600-2B16 aircraft.
Cracking of the wing anti-ice piccolo ducts could result in air
leakage, with an adverse effect on the anti-ice air distribution
pattern and a possible unannunciated insufficient heat condition. As
a result, the airplane flight manual (AFM) instructions have been
revised
[[Page 8463]]
to provide proper annunciation of an insufficient heat condition,
utilizing existing messages and indications, with instructions, to
the pilot, to leave icing conditions if sufficient heat cannot be
achieved or maintained.
This directive mandates the amendment of the AFM procedures, in
addition to checking the part numbers and serial numbers of the
installed wing anti-ice piccolo ducts and replacing them as
necessary.
The unsafe condition is anti-ice system air leakage with a
possible adverse effect on the anti-ice air distribution pattern and
anti-ice capability without annunciation to the flightcrew, and
consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2),
(c)(3), and (c)(4) of this AD: Within 30 days after the effective
date of this AD, revise the Normal and Abnormal Procedures sections
of the applicable Canadair Challenger Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)
by inserting a copy of the applicable temporary revision (TR) listed
in Table 2 of this AD. When the information in the applicable TR is
included in the general revisions of the AFM, the general revisions
may be inserted in the AFM, as applicable, and the TR may be
removed.
Table 2--Temporary Revisions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canadair TR-- Dated-- To the--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) 600/22.................... August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-1A11
AFM.
(ii) 600-1/17................. August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-1A11
AFM (Winglets).
(iii) 601/14.................. August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM, Product Support
Publication (PSP)
601-1B-1.
(iv) 601/15................... August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM, PSP 601-1A-1.
(v) 601/19.................... August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM, PSP 601-1B.
(vi) 601/26................... August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2B16
AFM, PSP 601A-1.
(vii) 601/27.................. August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM.
(viii) 601/27................. August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2B16
AFM, PSP 601A-1-1.
(ix) 604/20................... April 17, 2006... Canadair Challenger
Model CL-604 AFM,
PSP 604-1.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and
(c)(3) of this AD, and for Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-604) airplanes,
serial numbers 5301 through 5468 inclusive: Within 2,000 flight
hours or 60 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, review the airplane maintenance records to determine
if any anti-ice piccolo ducts or complete leading edge sections were
replaced on or after August 1, 2000.
(3) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and
(c)(3) of this AD, and for Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-604) airplanes,
serial numbers 5301 through 5468 inclusive: If, during the
accomplishment of the action required by paragraph (f)(2) of this
AD, it is determined that any anti-ice piccolo duct has been
replaced on or after August 1, 2000, before further flight, inspect
to determine if any affected serial number identified in paragraph
2.C. of the applicable service bulletin listed in Table 3 of this AD
is installed. A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable
in lieu of this inspection if the serial number of the duct can be
conclusively determined from that review. If any affected serial
number is installed, before further flight, replace the piccolo duct
with a serviceable piccolo duct that does not have a serial number
identified in paragraph 2.C. of the applicable service bulletin
listed in Table 3 of this AD. Do all actions in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service bulletin
listed in Table 3 of this AD.
Table 3--Service Bulletins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier
Model-- Service Revision-- Dated--
Bulletin--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes 600-0734 Original............ November 30, 2006.
(ii) CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) 601-0585 Original............ November 30, 2006.
airplanes.
(iii) CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL- 601-0585 Original............ November 30, 2006.
601-3R) airplanes.
(iv) CL-600-2B16 (CL-604) 604-30-003 01.................. January 21, 2008.
airplanes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) For Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-604) airplanes, serial numbers
5469 through 5635 inclusive: Within 2,000 flight hours or 60 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, inspect
the anti-ice piccolo ducts to determine if any affected serial
number identified in paragraph 2.C. of Bombardier Service Bulletin
604-30-003, Revision 01, dated January 21, 2008, is installed. If
any affected serial number is installed, before further flight,
replace the piccolo duct with a serviceable piccolo duct that does
not have a serial number identified in paragraph 2.C. of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 604-30-003, Revision 01, dated January 21, 2008. Do
all actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-30-003, Revision 01, dated January
21, 2008.
(5) As of April 28, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-06-05),
no person may install on any airplane an anti-ice piccolo duct with
a serial number identified in paragraph 2.C. of the applicable
service bulletin identified in Table 3 of this AD.
(6) Actions done before April 28, 2009, in accordance with
Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-30-003, dated November 30, 2006, are
acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions in this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516-228-7300;
fax 516-794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
[[Page 8464]]
actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the
State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are
required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to
service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2008-18,
dated May 9, 2008, and the service information identified in Table 2
and Table 3 of this AD, for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use the service information specified in Table 4
and Table 5 of this AD, as applicable, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
Table 4--Service Bulletins Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier Service Bulletin-- Revision-- Dated--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
600-0734...................... Original......... November 30, 2006.
601-0585...................... Original......... November 30, 2006.
604-30-003.................... 01............... January 21, 2008.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 5--Temporary Revisions Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canadair TR-- Dated-- To the--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
600/22........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-1A11
Airplane Flight
Manual (AFM).
600-1/17...................... August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-1A11
AFM (Winglets).
601/14........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM, PSP 601-1B-1.
601/15........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM, PSP 601-1A-1.
601/19........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM, PSP 601-1B.
601/26........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2B16
AFM, PSP 601A-1.
601/27........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM.
601/27........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2B16
AFM, PSP 601A-1-1.
604/20........................ April 17, 2006... Canadair Challenger
Model CL-604 AFM,
PSP 604-1.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information contained in
Table 6 of this AD under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Table 6--New Material Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canadair TR-- Dated-- To the--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
600/22........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-1A11
AFM.
600-1/17...................... August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-1A11
AFM (Winglets).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved
the incorporation by reference of the service information contained
in Table 7 and Table 8 of this AD on April 28, 2009 (74 FR 12225,
March 24, 2009).
Table 7--Service Bulletins Previously Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier Service Bulletin-- Revision-- Dated--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
600--0734..................... Original......... November 30, 2006.
601-0585...................... Original......... November 30, 2006.
604-30-003.................... 01............... January 21, 2008.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 8--Temporary Revisions Previously Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canadair TR-- Dated-- To the--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
601/14........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM, PSP 601-1B-1.
601/15........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM, PSP 601-1A-1.
601/19........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM, PSP 601-1B.
601/26........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2B16
AFM, PSP 601A-1.
601/27........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2A12
AFM.
601/27........................ August 16, 2006.. Canadair Challenger
Model CL-600-2B16
AFM, PSP 601A-1-1.
[[Page 8465]]
604/20........................ April 17, 2006... Canadair Challenger
Model CL-604 AFM,
PSP 604-1.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-
7401; e-mail thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
(4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(5) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 16, 2010.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-3463 Filed 2-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P