Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Renewal of Several Currently Approved Collections; Comment Request, 8335-8338 [2010-3694]
Download as PDF
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 24, 2010 / Notices
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 304 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here.
Based on the Agency’s knowledge of the
number of title V permits issued since
1997 and the implementation of part 64
through permit renewals, the expected
impact of the CAM program for the 3
years from October 1, 2010 until
September 30, 2013 is about 7.4 million
hours annually. The CAM rule will
incur an average annual cost of about
$263.8 million in 2008 dollars. There
are no annualized capital and operation
and maintenance (O&M) costs. EPA
assumes that any such equipment
needed by sources to comply with part
64 would be purchased as part of a
monitoring equipment purchase.
Therefore, O&M costs for operating such
capital equipment is not separately
estimated.
The CAM program burden for source
owners or operators means the total
time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
monitoring information to or for a
Federal Agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop,
acquire, install, and utilize technology
and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able
to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information. The CAM
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Feb 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
program potentially affects about 24,000
pollutant-specific emissions units
nationwide. The annual burden for
source owners or operators is about 7.4
million hours for these pollutantspecific emissions units.
During the review period, permitting
authorities will review CAM rule
submittals from source owners or
operators whose permits have already
been issued and are renewing those
permits as the 5-year permit terms
expire. Permitting authorities will also
be interacting with the source owners or
operators in addressing the CAM in
semi-annual monitoring reports and
reporting CAM data as necessary. We
estimate the annual CAM burden to
permitting authorities to total about
65,000 hours and about $3.5 million.
Burden means the sum of the time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency.
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 24,000 pollutant specific
emissions units.
Frequency of response: Semi-annual
and annual reports, plus every 5 years
at permit renewal.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
7.4 million hours.
Estimated average annual costs:
$263.8 million. This includes annual
labor costs for sources and permitting
authorities and no capital or O&M costs.
Are There Changes in the Estimates
From the Last Approval?
There is an increase of 4.3 million
hours in the total estimated respondent
annual burden compared with that
identified in the ICR currently approved
by OMB. This increase reflects the
significant increase in number of
respondents resulting from the
implementation of the rule through
operating permit renewals.
What Is the Next Step in the Process for
This ICR?
EPA will consider the comments
received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to
OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you
have any questions about this ICR or the
approval process, please contact the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8335
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: January 29, 2010.
Steve Fruh,
Acting Director, Sector Policies and Programs
Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2010–3683 Filed 2–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8808–1]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Renewal of
Several Currently Approved
Collections; Comment Request
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document
announces that EPA is planning to
submit requests to renew several
currently approved Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). The
ICRs are specifically identified in this
document by their corresponding titles,
EPA ICR numbers, OMB Control
numbers, and related docket
identification (ID) numbers. Before
submitting these ICRs to OMB for
review and approval, EPA is soliciting
comments on specific aspects of the
information collection activities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by the docket ID number for
the corresponding ICR as identified in
this document, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket
Facility’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
8336
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 24, 2010 / Notices
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
the docket ID number for the
corresponding ICR as identified in this
document. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the docket without change and may be
made available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
in https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the
electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket
Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions regarding EPA Docket ID
Number EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0885:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Feb 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
Rame Cromwell, Field and External
Affairs Division (7506P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (703) 308–
9068; fax number: (703) 305–5884; email address: cromwell.rame@epa.gov.
For questions regarding EPA Docket
ID Number EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0886:
Cameo Smoot, Field and External
Affairs Division (7506P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (703) 305–
5454; fax number: (703) 305–5884; email address: smoot.cameo@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What Information is EPA Particularly
Interested in?
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
PRA, EPA specifically solicits
comments and information to enable it
to:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility.
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimates of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses. In
particular, EPA is requesting comments
from very small businesses (those that
employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA
could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses
affected by this collection.
II. What Should I Consider When I
Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following
suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as
possible and provide specific examples.
2. Describe any assumptions that you
used.
3. Provide copies of any technical
information and/or data you used that
support your views.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4. If you estimate potential burden or
costs, explain how you arrived at the
estimate that you provide.
5. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns.
6. Offer alternative ways to improve
the collection activity.
7. Make sure to submit your
comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
be sure to identify the docket ID number
assigned to this action in the subject
line on the first page of your response.
You may also provide the name, date,
and Federal Register citation.
III. What Do I Need to Know About
PRA?
An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
subject to PRA approval unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR), after
appearing in the preamble of the final
rule, are further displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or
by other appropriate means, such as on
the related collection instruments or
form, if applicable. The display of OMB
control numbers for certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in a list at 40
CFR 9.1.
Under PRA, burden means the total
time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency.
This includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install,
and utilize technology and systems for
the purposes of collecting, validating,
and verifying information, processing
and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with
any previously applicable instructions
and requirements which have
subsequently changed; train personnel
to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
IV. Which ICRs Are Being Renewed?
EPA is planning to submit a number
of currently approved ICRs to OMB for
review and approval under PRA. In
addition to specifically identifying the
ICRs by title and corresponding ICR,
OMB and docket ID numbers, this unit
provides a brief summary of the
information collection activity and the
Agency’s estimated burden. The
Supporting Statement for each ICR, a
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 24, 2010 / Notices
copy of which is available in the
corresponding docket, provides a more
detailed explanation.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
A. Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2009–0885
Title: Pesticide Registration Fee
Waivers.
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2147.04,
OMB Control No. 2070–0167.
ICR status: The approval for this ICR
is scheduled to expire on October 31,
2010.
Affected entities: Entities potentially
affected by this ICR include pesticide
registrants seeking a waiver or
exemption of fees under the Pesticide
Registration Improvement Renewal Act
(PRIA). The North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes
include 325320 (pesticide and other
agricultural chemical manufacturing),
32518 (other basic inorganic chemical
manufacturing), and 32519 (other basic
organic chemical manufacturing).
Abstract: This information collection
will allow EPA to process requests for
waivers and exemptions of fees under
the Pesticide Registration Improvement
Renewal Act of 2007 (PRIA 2) which
established section 33 of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA). The ICR covers the
collection activities associated with
requesting a fee waiver or exemption
and involves requesters submitting a
waiver or exemption request to provide
information to demonstrate eligibility
for the waiver or exemption and
certification of eligibility. Waivers are
available for small businesses and minor
uses and exemptions are available for
minor uses and actions solely associated
with the Inter-Regional Research Project
Number 4 (IR–4). State and Federal
agencies are exempt from the payment
of fees. This ICR provides burden hour
and labor cost estimates for both
applicants for fee waivers and EPA
employees who process and approve or
deny waiver requests.
Burden statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 12 to 37 hours per
response depending upon the type (A,
B, or C) of respondent. The ICR, a copy
of which is available in the docket,
provides a detailed explanation of this
estimate, which is only briefly
summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential
respondent requests: 1,800.
Frequency of response: As needed.
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: 1.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
5,611 hours.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Feb 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
Estimated total annual costs:
$335,328.
Changes in the estimates from the last
approval: The renewal of this ICR will
result in an overall decrease of 2,757
hours in the total estimated respondent
burden identified in the currently
approved ICR. This decrease reflects a
shift in both the number and type of
waiver requests submitted. The average
estimated burden per response has not
changed. However, the total number of
responses per year decreased from 389
to 293. In addition, there was a shift in
the distribution of responses to the
least-burdensome type, resulting in the
lower total estimated burden. This
change is an adjustment.
B. Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2009–0886
Title: Submission of Unreasonable
Adverse Effects Information under
FIFRA Section 6(a)(2).
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1204.11,
OMB Control No. 2070–0039.
ICR status: The approval for this ICR
is scheduled to expire on October 31,
2010.
Affected entities: Entities potentially
affected by this ICR include anyone who
holds or ever held a registration for a
pesticide product issued under FIFRA
section 3 or section 24(c). The NAICS
code is 325320 (pesticide and other
agricultural chemical manufacturing).
Abstract: This ICR is a proposed
renewal of an existing ICR that is
currently approved by OMB and is due
to expire October 31, 2010. Section
6(a)(2) of FIFRA requires pesticide
registrants to submit information to the
Agency which may be relevant to the
balancing of the risks and benefits of a
pesticide product.
The statute requires the registrant to
submit any factual information that it
acquires regarding adverse effects
associated with its pesticidal products,
and it is up to the Agency to determine
whether or not that factual information
constitutes an unreasonable adverse
effect. In order to limit the amount of
less meaningful information that might
be submitted to the Agency, EPA has
limited the scope of factual information
that the registrant must submit. The
Agency’s regulations at 40 CFR 159
provide a detailed description of the
reporting obligations of registrants
under FIFRA section 6(a)(2).
As expected, implementation of the
1998 final regulations (June 19, 1998; 63
FR 33580) initially resulted in an
increase in the number of incident
reports submitted annually. That was
assumed to be the result of increased
awareness and understanding on the
part of pesticide registrants of their
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8337
reporting responsibilities under FIFRA
section 6(a)(2). After the first year under
the regulations, incident reporting
leveled off and has remained generally
consistent. Study submissions, on the
other hand, have gradually decreased as
the pesticide re-registration program
data call-in activities wound down. For
the purposes of this renewal the
estimate for study and incident
submissions have been averaged for the
three fiscal years 2006–2008.
Burden statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average a range of 2.1 hours
to 3.5 hours per response. The ICR, a
copy of which is available in the docket,
provides a detailed explanation of this
estimate, which is only briefly
summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 1,733.
Frequency of response: As needed.
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: For
submission of studies less than 1.
Submission of incidents may range from
1 to 40, however, incidents are usually
reported as aggregate statistics.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
203,236 hours.
Estimated total annual costs:
$11,793,027.
Changes in the estimates from the last
approval: The renewal of this ICR will
result in an overall increase of 35,920
hours in the total estimated respondent
burden identified in the currently
approved ICR. Total burden hour
estimates associated with studies are
reduced because the estimated number
of study submissions is reduced from
240 to 183 studies. Burden estimates
associated with the number of incident
reports, however, are increased because
of the increased volume of incident
reporting (31%). In addition, an increase
in the number of registrants of active
products (1,733 versus 1,720) results in
the need for additional employees to be
trained. Overall, considering the net
effect of the decrease in studies and the
increase in incidents as well as the
change in employee training, the total
respondent burden hours increased
from 167,316 to 203,236.
V. What is the Next Step in the Process
for These ICRs?
EPA will consider the comments
received and amend the individual ICRs
as appropriate. The final ICR packages
will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12. EPA will issue another Federal
Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the
submission of these ICRs to OMB and
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
8338
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 24, 2010 / Notices
the opportunity for the public to submit
additional comments for OMB
consideration. If you have any questions
about any of these ICRs or the approval
process in general, please contact the
people listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 17, 2010.
James Jones,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of
Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
[FR Doc. 2010–3694 Filed 2–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9117–7]
EPA Science Advisory Board Staff
Office Notification of a Meeting of the
Ecological Effects Subcommittee of
the Advisory Council on Clean Air
Compliance Analysis (Council)
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The EPA Science Advisory
Board (SAB) Staff Office announces a
public meeting of the Ecological Effects
Subcommittee (EES) of the Advisory
Council on Clean Air Compliance
Analysis (Council). The EES,
supplemented with additional members
from the Science Advisory Board and
the Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee, will review draft documents
regarding ecological effects of modeled
air quality scenarios developed to
support the Second Section 812 BenefitCost Analysis of the Clean Air Act. The
assessment of ecological effects has been
developed in support of the Office of
Air and Radiation’s Second Section 812
Prospective Analysis of the benefits and
costs of the Clean Air Act.
DATES: The EES augmented with
additional experts will meet on
Tuesday, March 9, 2010 and
Wednesday, March 10, 2010, beginning
at 8:30 a.m. and ending no later than 5
p.m. (Eastern Time), each day.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at the SAB Conference Center at
1025 F Street, NW., Suite 3700,
Washington, DC 20004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Members of the public who wish to
obtain further information about this
meeting may contact Ms. Stephanie
Sanzone, Designated Federal Officer
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Feb 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
(DFO), EPA Science Advisory Board
Staff Office (1400F), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460;
by telephone/voice mail: (202) 343–9697
or at sanzone.stephanie@epa.gov.
General information about the Council
may be found on the Council Web site
at: https://www.epa.gov/
advisorycouncilcaa.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: Pursuant to the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C., App.
2 (FACA), notice is hereby given that
the Ecological Effects Subcommittee
(EES) of the Advisory Council on Clean
Air Compliance Analysis (Council),
augmented with additional experts, will
hold a public meeting to evaluate draft
documents regarding ecological effects
of modeled air quality scenarios
developed to support the Second
Section 812 Benefit-Cost Analysis of the
Clean Air Act. The Council was
established in 1991 pursuant to the
Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of
1990 (42 U.S.C. 7612) to provide advice,
information and recommendations on
technical and economic aspects of
analyses and reports EPA prepares on
the impacts of the CAA on the public
health, economy, and environment of
the United States. The Council is a
Federal Advisory Committee chartered
under FACA. The EES will provide
advice through the Council and will
comply with the provisions of FACA
and all appropriate SAB Staff Office
procedural policies.
Pursuant to Section 812 of the 1990
Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA),
EPA conducts periodic studies to assess
benefits and costs of the EPA’s
regulatory actions under the Clean Air
Act. The Council has provided advice
on an EPA retrospective study
published in 1997 and an EPA
prospective study completed in 1999.
EPA initiated a second prospective
study to evaluate the benefits and costs
of EPA Clean Air programs for years
1990–2020. The Council has previously
provided advice on the analytical
blueprint for this study. EPA’s Office of
Air and Radiation (OAR) is now nearing
completion of the analytical work for
the second prospective study.
At the March 9 and 10, 2010 meeting,
the EES will review draft technical
documents pertaining to ecological
effects associated with air quality
scenarios developed using the
Community Multiscale Air Quality
(CMAQ) model for seven emissions
scenarios: a 1990 baseline simulation;
and simulations for 2000, 2010 and
2020 with and without the CAAA. The
draft documents compare simulated
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
pollutant exposures with the
distribution of sensitive ecosystems in
the United States to assess ecosystems at
risk from acidic deposition, total
nitrogen deposition, and tropospheric
ozone concentrations. In addition, the
draft documents present case studies on
benefits of the CAAA for recreation
fishing and the timber industry in the
Adirondack Region of New York State.
Chapter 4 of the draft Benefits Analyses
to Support the Second Section 812
Benefit-Cost Analysis describes the
estimation of the physical effects of the
air quality scenarios for ozone on
agriculture and commercial forestry.
OAR is requesting that the EES review
the data choices, methodological
choices for analyzing the data, and the
overall validity and utility of the
estimated changes in ecological effects
from air pollution between the withCAAA90 and without-CAAA90
scenarios. The following documents are
provided to the EES: (1) Effects of Air
Pollutants on Ecological Resources:
Literature Review and Case Studies.
Draft Report, February 2010. Prepared
by Industrial Economics, Inc., for James
DeMocker, EPA Office of Policy
Analysis and Review; and (2) Benefits
Analyses to Support the Second Section
812 Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Clean
Air Act, Draft. Chapter 4: Agricultural
and Forest Productivity Benefits. Draft
Report, February 2010. Prepared by
Industrial Economics, Inc., for the EPA
Office of Air and Radiation.
Technical Contacts: The Office of Air
and Radiation technical contact for the
Second Section 812 Benefit-Cost
Analysis of the Clean Air Act is Mr. Jim
DeMocker at (202) 564–1673 or
democker.jim@epa.gov.
Availability of Meeting Materials: EPA
draft documents provided to the EES are
available at https://www.epa.gov/oar/
sect812/prospective2.html.
The meeting agenda for March 9 and
10, 2010 and any background materials
will be posted on the Council Web site
https://www.epa.gov/advisorycouncilcaa
prior to the meeting.
Procedures for Providing Public Input:
Interested members of the public may
submit relevant written information on
the group conducting the activity or
written or oral information for the EES
to consider on the topics of this
advisory activity. Oral Statements: In
general, individuals or groups
requesting an oral presentation at a
public meeting will be limited to five
minutes per speaker, with no more than
one hour for all speakers. Interested
parties should contact Ms. Sanzone at
the contact information provided above
by March 2, 2010, to be placed on the
public speaker list for the March 9 and
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8335-8338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3694]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8808-1]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Renewal of
Several Currently Approved Collections; Comment Request
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to
submit requests to renew several currently approved Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
The ICRs are specifically identified in this document by their
corresponding titles, EPA ICR numbers, OMB Control numbers, and related
docket identification (ID) numbers. Before submitting these ICRs to OMB
for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects
of the information collection activities.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by the docket ID number for
the corresponding ICR as identified in this document, by one of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The
[[Page 8336]]
Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to the docket ID number for the
corresponding ICR as identified in this document. EPA's policy is that
all comments received will be included in the docket without change and
may be made available on-line at https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not
submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected
through regulations.gov or e-mail. The regulations.gov website is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and
other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk
or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available in https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions regarding EPA Docket ID
Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0885: Rame Cromwell, Field and External Affairs
Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 308-9068; fax number: (703) 305-5884; e-
mail address: cromwell.rame@epa.gov.
For questions regarding EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0886:
Cameo Smoot, Field and External Affairs Division (7506P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 305-5454;
fax number: (703) 305-5884; e-mail address: smoot.cameo@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What Information is EPA Particularly Interested in?
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of PRA, EPA specifically solicits
comments and information to enable it to:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimates of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected.
4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.
II. What Should I Consider When I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
6. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
7. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.
III. What Do I Need to Know About PRA?
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information subject to PRA approval
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB
control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), after appearing in the preamble of the final
rule, are further displayed either by publication in the Federal
Register or by other appropriate means, such as on the related
collection instruments or form, if applicable. The display of OMB
control numbers for certain EPA regulations is consolidated in a list
at 40 CFR 9.1.
Under PRA, burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
IV. Which ICRs Are Being Renewed?
EPA is planning to submit a number of currently approved ICRs to
OMB for review and approval under PRA. In addition to specifically
identifying the ICRs by title and corresponding ICR, OMB and docket ID
numbers, this unit provides a brief summary of the information
collection activity and the Agency's estimated burden. The Supporting
Statement for each ICR, a
[[Page 8337]]
copy of which is available in the corresponding docket, provides a more
detailed explanation.
A. Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0885
Title: Pesticide Registration Fee Waivers.
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2147.04, OMB Control No. 2070-0167.
ICR status: The approval for this ICR is scheduled to expire on
October 31, 2010.
Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this ICR
include pesticide registrants seeking a waiver or exemption of fees
under the Pesticide Registration Improvement Renewal Act (PRIA). The
North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes include
325320 (pesticide and other agricultural chemical manufacturing), 32518
(other basic inorganic chemical manufacturing), and 32519 (other basic
organic chemical manufacturing).
Abstract: This information collection will allow EPA to process
requests for waivers and exemptions of fees under the Pesticide
Registration Improvement Renewal Act of 2007 (PRIA 2) which established
section 33 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA). The ICR covers the collection activities associated with
requesting a fee waiver or exemption and involves requesters submitting
a waiver or exemption request to provide information to demonstrate
eligibility for the waiver or exemption and certification of
eligibility. Waivers are available for small businesses and minor uses
and exemptions are available for minor uses and actions solely
associated with the Inter-Regional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4).
State and Federal agencies are exempt from the payment of fees. This
ICR provides burden hour and labor cost estimates for both applicants
for fee waivers and EPA employees who process and approve or deny
waiver requests.
Burden statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 12 to
37 hours per response depending upon the type (A, B, or C) of
respondent. The ICR, a copy of which is available in the docket,
provides a detailed explanation of this estimate, which is only briefly
summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential respondent requests: 1,800.
Frequency of response: As needed.
Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent: 1.
Estimated total annual burden hours: 5,611 hours.
Estimated total annual costs: $335,328.
Changes in the estimates from the last approval: The renewal of
this ICR will result in an overall decrease of 2,757 hours in the total
estimated respondent burden identified in the currently approved ICR.
This decrease reflects a shift in both the number and type of waiver
requests submitted. The average estimated burden per response has not
changed. However, the total number of responses per year decreased from
389 to 293. In addition, there was a shift in the distribution of
responses to the least-burdensome type, resulting in the lower total
estimated burden. This change is an adjustment.
B. Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0886
Title: Submission of Unreasonable Adverse Effects Information under
FIFRA Section 6(a)(2).
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1204.11, OMB Control No. 2070-0039.
ICR status: The approval for this ICR is scheduled to expire on
October 31, 2010.
Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this ICR
include anyone who holds or ever held a registration for a pesticide
product issued under FIFRA section 3 or section 24(c). The NAICS code
is 325320 (pesticide and other agricultural chemical manufacturing).
Abstract: This ICR is a proposed renewal of an existing ICR that is
currently approved by OMB and is due to expire October 31, 2010.
Section 6(a)(2) of FIFRA requires pesticide registrants to submit
information to the Agency which may be relevant to the balancing of the
risks and benefits of a pesticide product.
The statute requires the registrant to submit any factual
information that it acquires regarding adverse effects associated with
its pesticidal products, and it is up to the Agency to determine
whether or not that factual information constitutes an unreasonable
adverse effect. In order to limit the amount of less meaningful
information that might be submitted to the Agency, EPA has limited the
scope of factual information that the registrant must submit. The
Agency's regulations at 40 CFR 159 provide a detailed description of
the reporting obligations of registrants under FIFRA section 6(a)(2).
As expected, implementation of the 1998 final regulations (June 19,
1998; 63 FR 33580) initially resulted in an increase in the number of
incident reports submitted annually. That was assumed to be the result
of increased awareness and understanding on the part of pesticide
registrants of their reporting responsibilities under FIFRA section
6(a)(2). After the first year under the regulations, incident reporting
leveled off and has remained generally consistent. Study submissions,
on the other hand, have gradually decreased as the pesticide re-
registration program data call-in activities wound down. For the
purposes of this renewal the estimate for study and incident
submissions have been averaged for the three fiscal years 2006-2008.
Burden statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average a
range of 2.1 hours to 3.5 hours per response. The ICR, a copy of which
is available in the docket, provides a detailed explanation of this
estimate, which is only briefly summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential respondents: 1,733.
Frequency of response: As needed.
Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
For submission of studies less than 1. Submission of incidents may
range from 1 to 40, however, incidents are usually reported as
aggregate statistics.
Estimated total annual burden hours: 203,236 hours.
Estimated total annual costs: $11,793,027.
Changes in the estimates from the last approval: The renewal of
this ICR will result in an overall increase of 35,920 hours in the
total estimated respondent burden identified in the currently approved
ICR. Total burden hour estimates associated with studies are reduced
because the estimated number of study submissions is reduced from 240
to 183 studies. Burden estimates associated with the number of incident
reports, however, are increased because of the increased volume of
incident reporting (31%). In addition, an increase in the number of
registrants of active products (1,733 versus 1,720) results in the need
for additional employees to be trained. Overall, considering the net
effect of the decrease in studies and the increase in incidents as well
as the change in employee training, the total respondent burden hours
increased from 167,316 to 203,236.
V. What is the Next Step in the Process for These ICRs?
EPA will consider the comments received and amend the individual
ICRs as appropriate. The final ICR packages will then be submitted to
OMB for review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of these ICRs to OMB and
[[Page 8338]]
the opportunity for the public to submit additional comments for OMB
consideration. If you have any questions about any of these ICRs or the
approval process in general, please contact the people listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 17, 2010.
James Jones,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and
Toxic Substances.
[FR Doc. 2010-3694 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S