Huron-Manistee National Forests, Michigan, USA and State South Branch 1-8 Well, 8297-8299 [2010-3587]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 24, 2010 / Notices
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology should be addressed to: Desk
Officer for Agriculture, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), OIRA_Submission@OMB.
EOP.GOV or fax (202) 395–5806 and to
Departmental Clearance Office, USDA,
OCIO, Mail Stop 7602, Washington, DC
20250–7602. Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received
within 30 days of this notification.
Copies of the submission(s) may be
obtained by calling (202) 720–8958.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Food Safety and Inspection Service
Title: Electronic Animal Disease
Reporting System.
OMB Control Number: 0583–0139.
Summary of Collection: The Food
Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has
been delegated the authority to exercise
the functions of the Secretary as
provided in the Federal Meat Inspection
Act (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the
Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA)
(21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.). These statutes
mandate that FSIS protect the public by
ensuring that meat and poultry products
are safe, wholesome, unadulterated, and
properly labeled and packaged. In
accordance with 9 CFR 320, 381.175,
180, 303.1(b)(3), 352.15, and 354.91,
establishments that slaughter meat,
poultry, exotic animals, and rabbits are
required to maintain certain records
regarding their business operations and
to report this information to the Agency
as required. For the Agency’s electronic
Animal Disease Reporting System
(eADRS), establishments report (by
shift) slaughter totals in number of
heads and weight by animal category.
EADRS is an information system that
tracks and reports data on the number
of animals slaughtered, animal diseases,
and animal welfare information in the
United States.
Need and Use of the Information: For
eADRS, establishments report orally to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Feb 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
FSIS inspection personnel in the plant,
slaughter totals (by shift) in number of
heads and weight by animal category.
FSIS uses this information to plan
inspection activities, to develop
sampling plans for testing, to target
establishments for testing, for Agency
budget planning, and in its reports to
Congress.
Description of Respondents: Business
or other for-profit.
Number of Respondents: 1,341.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Other (daily).
Total Burden Hours: 48,350.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–3744 Filed 2–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Tongass National Forest, Thorne Bay
Ranger District, Thorne Bay, AK
AGENCY:
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Cancellation of Notice of intent
to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement published in the Federal
Register on April 3, 2000 (page 17482).
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service is issuing
this notice to advise the public that we
are canceling the Notice of Intent (NOI)
to prepare Kosciusko Island Timber Sale
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
to assess and disclose the environmental
effects of timber harvest and road
building to provide timber for the
Tongass National Forest Timber Sale
Program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Roberts, Zone Planner, Thorne
Bay Ranger District, Tongass National
Forest, P.O. Box 19001, Thorne Bay, AK
99919, telephone: 907–828–3250.
The
47,007-acre Kosciusko Project Area is
located approximately 48 air miles
northwest of Thome Bay, Alaska. A
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for this project was published in 1993.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: February 16, 2010.
Forrest Cole,
Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2010–3517 Filed 2–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–GM–M
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8297
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Huron-Manistee National Forests,
Michigan, USA and State South Branch
1–8 Well
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Huron-Manistee National
Forests (Forest Service) and the Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) as a
Cooperating Agency will prepare an
environmental impact statement (ETS)
to assess the environmental impacts of
an industry proposal to drill one
exploratory natural gas well (the USA &
State South Branch 1–8 (SB 1–8) well)
on National Forest System lands. The
EIS will also assess the impacts of
constructing necessary infrastructure
including production facility and
flowline, to develop the well should it
be capable of producing hydrocarbons
in commercial quantities. This analysis
will allow the agencies to make their
respective decisions on this proposal in
accordance with Federal regulations.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
April 12, 2010. The draft environmental
impact statement is expected in
December, 2010 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected by July 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Lauri Hogeboom, Interdisciplinary
Team Leader, Huron-Manistee National
Forests, 1755 S. Mitchell Street,
Cadillac, MI, 49601; fax: 231–775–5551.
Send electronic comments to:
comments-eastern-huronmanistee@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken
Arbogast, Huron-Manistee National
Forests; telephone: 231–775–2421; fax:
231–775–5551. See address above under
Addresses. Copies of documents may be
requested at the same address. Another
means of obtaining information is to
visit the Forest Web page at https://
www.fs.fed.us/r9/hmnf then click on
‘‘Project and Planning,’’ then ‘‘Mio
District,’’ and then ‘‘USA and State
South Branch 1–8.’’ Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TTY) may call 1–231–775–3183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose for action is to respond
to the proponent, Savoy Energy, LP’s
(Savoy) proposal to exercise its rights
under Federal leases to drill for, extract,
remove and dispose of all the oil and
gas from leased lands. The Huron-
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
8298
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 24, 2010 / Notices
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Manistee National Forests (Forest
Service) and the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) received an
Application for Permit to Drill (APD)
including a Surface Use Plan of
Operation (SUPO) from Savoy.
A response to the application is
needed because Savoy has lawful oil
and gas rights to three State and three
Federal leases in a 640 acre drilling unit
and the Forest Supervisor (FS) and the
Milwaukee Field Office Manager (BLM)
are required by regulation to evaluate
and decide upon operating plans
received from industry for exploration
and development of Federal leases. The
agencies must ensure Savoy’s operating
plan is consistent with the terms and
stipulations of the Federal mineral
leases, applicable laws and regulations,
the Huron-Manistee’s Land and
Resource Management Plan, and
identify any additional conditions
needed to protect Federal resources.
The BLM ultimately renders a
decision on the APD, and the Forest
Service must review and decide upon
the SUPO before the BLM can make its
APD decision.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes to
authorize Savoy to conduct surface
operations associated with accessing,
drilling, testing, and completing the
USA and State South Branch 1–8 Well,
as described in detail under Alternative
2: The Proposed Action and described
in the Surface Use Plan of Operations
(SUPO) and Application for Permit to
Drill (APD) submitted to the BLM. The
Forest Service would approve the
Surface Use Plan of Operations for the
USA and State South Branch 1–8 Well.
The BLM proposes to authorize Savoy
to conduct operations to drill test and
complete the proposed exploratory well
on the subject leases and approve the
APD submitted for this well.
The Forest Service and BLM
authorization would include reasonable
and necessary mitigation to ensure
Savoy’s operations would be in
compliance with law, regulation, and
policy.
Savoy holds six subsurface mineral
leases included in a 640 acre drilling
unit in South Branch Township (T25N,
R1W), Crawford County, Michigan,
Section 7 E 1⁄2, Section 8 W 1⁄2. This 640
acre drilling unit includes three State
and three Federal oil and gas leases.
Savoy is proposing to drill directionally
from National Forest System lands
within the boundaries of the HuronManistee National Forests to the
bottomhole located in Federal mineral
lease MIES 50521 approximately 2,200
feet NW of the surface hole and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Feb 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
construct associated infrastructure
including a production facility and
flowline if Savoy determines the well
could produce a commercial product.
Savoy’s proposal includes: Leveling of
the well pad (approximately 3.5 acres)
for the drilling rig, equipment, and pit,
including some minor cut and fill using
a bulldozer to level the surface. It also
includes the use, reconstruction and
maintenance of existing roads for yearround access, including snow plowing
along portions of River Lake Road (aka
Hickey Creek Road), FSR 4209 (Mason
Chapel Road), and FSR 4208, to access
the well site; construction and
maintenance of 50 feet of new road, 14
feet wide with three feet of clearing on
each side of the new road
(approximately 0.05 acre of disturbance)
to access the well pad from FSR 4208;
and drilling a water well at the well pad
site to provide water for drilling and
future well maintenance, if needed.
Following these activities drilling
equipment would be moved in and
rigged up.
Drilling and well completion would
be expected to take 45 days. Drilling
operations would be restricted to a time
period of December 1 to April 15. The
well pad would be approximately 3.5
acres in size. Standard and accepted
drilling techniques and practices would
be used and must comply with
mininum operating standards approved
by Michigan Department of Natural
Resouces and Environment and the
BLM. This includes a casing program,
pressure control equipment, and
proposed drilling fluids program.
Hazardous materials, including
stimulation and completion fluids,
would be contained in steel tanks and
disposed of by a licensed waste hauler.
Additional actions proposed if the
well is productive include: construction
of a production facility located in SE,
Section 9, T25N, Ri W, (approximately
1.5 miles from the well pad) on
approximately 2.0 acres, including
intallation of a gas/water separator, oil
and brine tanks, dehydrator,
compressor, volume bottle, and
measurement (monitoring) equipment;
installation of flowlines from the well
site to the production facility site,
buried along side the road bed and a
pipeline to the Michigan Consolidated
Gas transmission line, totaling
approximately 1.7 miles, and
reclamation of the well pad, following
drilling and completion, leaving 1⁄3 acre
used for well operations.
If the well is not capable of
commercial production, the operator
plug and abandon the well under
applicable State and BLM rules.
Reclamation of the site according to the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reclamation plan included with the
SUPO would occur within six months of
completion of well plugging. This
would include: Recontouring and
stabilizing all excavations, topsoil
removed during leveling will be spread
evenly over the site except the roads;
the site would be seeded with a Forest
Service approved mix; the flowline
route would be restored and the 50 foot
access road would be obliterated.
Michigan Department of Natural
Resources and Environment’s Water
Management Practices on Forest Land
will be used to manage the roads.
Additionally, prior to reconstructing
FSR 4209, approximately 150 feet of silt
fence would be placed per FS direction
adjacent to the south side of the road for
wetland protection.
The operator would maintain a dike
around the condensate and brine tanks
at the production facility of sufficient
size and height so as to contain 150%
of the total capacity of the tanks.
The width of the reconstucted roads
would not exceed 14 feet. An additional
3 feet of clearing would be done on each
side of the road. Clearing width would
not exceed 20 feet.
Soil disturbed with the placement of
the flowline/pipeline would be seeded
with mix specified by the Forest
Service.
Roads into the well pad and
production facility would be gated and
locked.
Road design and construction would
take into account visual quality.
Minimization of noise is to be
emphasized during drilling, completion,
and production operations. Hospitaltype engine mufflers would be used on
drilling, completion, and work over rigs,
mud pumps, and compressors. No
pumps or motors would be placed on
the surface of the well or at the well site.
The total sound level for the production
facility would not exceed 36 dBA at
1,320 feet if more than one well is being
processed. If the production facility is
processing gas from one well, the sound
level would not exceed 33 dBA at 1,320
feet. The production facility would be
constructed to meet these sound levels.
Off-road equipment would be
inspected by a Forest Service
representative and washed if needed to
prevent introduction of non-native
invasive plants that are not already
present in the project area.
Protection will be provided for
Endangered, Threatened and Sensitive
Species in accordance with law,
regulation and policy.
The Forest Service, the BLM, and
MDNRE will coordinate inspections to
ensure compliance with requirements.
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 24, 2010 / Notices
Possible Alternatives
No Action alternative: The Forest
Service would not approve the SUPO
and br the BLM would not approve the
APD. Current direction would continue
to guide management of the project area.
The USA and State South Branch 1–8
well would not be drilled, no flow lines
would be installed, and no production
facility would be constructed.
Alternative 2: Modification of Savoy’s
Proposal—The Forest Service would
approve the SUPO and the BLM would
approve the APD subject to additional
conditions of approval necessary for
resource protection. Alternative 2 would
be the same as the proposed action
except with additional conditions of
approval to the SUPO and APD based
on mitigation developed to respond to
the issues raised.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The BLM and the Forest Service
entered into an Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) in April 2006 ‘‘to
establish procedures for the coordinated
dministration of oil and gas operations
on Federal leases within the National
Forest System (NFS).’’ The MOU
identifies the responsibilities of the
agencies to provide efficient, effective
adherence to rules and regulations for
each. Specifically, the MOU states,
‘‘111A3. ‘* * * the Forest Service has the
full responsibility and authority to approve
and regulate all suface -disturbing activities
associated with oil and gas exploration and
development through analysis and approval
of the SUPO component of an APD.’ ’’ VB]
Forest Service will: Serve as lead agency for
oil and gas * * * environmental analyses
required for APD: * * *’’
‘‘111A2. The BLM has the authority and
responsibility to provide final approval of all
APDs, including those for operations on
Federals leases on NFS lands * * * The BLM
has the authority and responsibility to
regulate all down-hole operations and
directly related surface activities and use,
and provide approval of the drilling plan and
final approval of the APD on NFS lands.’’
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
This MOU is consistent with the
NEPA regulations, 40 CFR 1501.5 Lead
Agency and 1501.6 Cooperating
Agencies, identifying the Forest Service
as the lead agency and the BLM as the
cooperating agency.
Responsible Official for Lead Agency
Barry Paulson, Forest Supervisor,
Huron-Manistee National Forests, 1755
S. Mitchell Street, Cadillac, MI 49601.
Responsible Official for Cooperating
Agency
Mark Storzer, Field Manager, Bureau
of Land Management, Milwaukee Field
Office, 626 E Wisconsin Ave. Suite 200,
Milwaukee, WI 53202–46 17.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Feb 23, 2010
Jkt 220001
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor of the HuronManistee National Forests will issue a
decision on whether to approve,
approve subject to specified conditions,
or disapprove for stated reasons, the
proposed Surface Use Plan of
Operations or development of the well
and construction and operation of the
flowline/pipeline and production
facilities. Similarly, the BLM Field
Manager in Milwaukee will issue a
decision on whether to approve the
Application for Permit to Drill as
submitted, approve subject to
appropriate modifications or conditions,
or disapprove for stated reasons.
Preliminary Issues
We expect issues to include possible
effects of noise, odor and changes to the
visual quality from the project on
anglers and visitors to the SemiPrimitive Nonmotorized area and Mason
Tract, as well as the possible effects of
the project on tourism in the county.
Permits and Licenses Required
Savoy will be required to obtain a
State permit for drilling from the
Michigan Department of Natural
Resources and Environment.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. The Forest Service
plans to scope for information by
contacting persons and organizations
interested or potentially affected by the
proposed action by using mailings,
public announcements, and personal
contacts.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. The submission of timely
and specific comments can affect a
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative appeal or
judicial review.
We are especially interested in
information that might identify a
specific undesired result of
implementing the proposed action.
Comments will be used to help
formulate alternatives to the proposed
action. Please make your written
comments as specific as possible as they
relate to the proposed action, and
include your name, address, and if
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8299
possible, telephone number and e-mail
address.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be considered part of the public record
on this proposed action and will be
available for public inspection.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered; however,
those who submit anonymous
comments will not have standing to
appeal the subsequent decisions under
36 CFR part 215. Additionally, pursuant
to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any persons may
request the agency to withhold a
submission from the public record by
showing how the FOIA (Freedom of
Information Act) permits such
confidentiality. Persons requesting such
confidentiality should be aware that
under FOIA confidentiality may be
granted in only very limited
circumstances, such as to protect trade
secrets. The Forest Service will inform
the requester of the agency’s decision
regarding the request for confidentiality
and, should the request be denied,
return the submission and notify the
requester that the comments may be
resubmitted with or without name and
address within 90 days.
Dated: February 16, 2010.
Barry Paulson,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010–3587 Filed 2–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2007-0044]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement;
Determination of Regulated Status of
Alfalfa Genetically Engineered for
Tolerance to the Herbicide Glyphosate
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice; extension of comment
period and rescheduled public meeting.
SUMMARY: We are extending the
comment period for our notice of
availability of a draft environmental
impact statement in connection with
making a determination on the status of
the Monsanto Company and Forage
Genetics International alfalfa lines
designated as events J101 and J163 as
regulated articles. This notice also
provides notice that a public meeting
scheduled for February 9, 2010, has
been rescheduled for February 24, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8297-8299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3587]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Huron-Manistee National Forests, Michigan, USA and State South
Branch 1-8 Well
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Huron-Manistee National Forests (Forest Service) and the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) as a Cooperating Agency will prepare an
environmental impact statement (ETS) to assess the environmental
impacts of an industry proposal to drill one exploratory natural gas
well (the USA & State South Branch 1-8 (SB 1-8) well) on National
Forest System lands. The EIS will also assess the impacts of
constructing necessary infrastructure including production facility and
flowline, to develop the well should it be capable of producing
hydrocarbons in commercial quantities. This analysis will allow the
agencies to make their respective decisions on this proposal in
accordance with Federal regulations.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by April 12, 2010. The draft environmental impact statement is expected
in December, 2010 and the final environmental impact statement is
expected by July 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Lauri Hogeboom, Interdisciplinary
Team Leader, Huron-Manistee National Forests, 1755 S. Mitchell Street,
Cadillac, MI, 49601; fax: 231-775-5551. Send electronic comments to:
comments-eastern-huron-manistee@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Arbogast, Huron-Manistee National
Forests; telephone: 231-775-2421; fax: 231-775-5551. See address above
under Addresses. Copies of documents may be requested at the same
address. Another means of obtaining information is to visit the Forest
Web page at https://www.fs.fed.us/r9/hmnf then click on ``Project and
Planning,'' then ``Mio District,'' and then ``USA and State South
Branch 1-8.'' Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the
deaf (TTY) may call 1-231-775-3183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose for action is to respond to the proponent, Savoy
Energy, LP's (Savoy) proposal to exercise its rights under Federal
leases to drill for, extract, remove and dispose of all the oil and gas
from leased lands. The Huron-
[[Page 8298]]
Manistee National Forests (Forest Service) and the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) received an Application for Permit to Drill (APD)
including a Surface Use Plan of Operation (SUPO) from Savoy.
A response to the application is needed because Savoy has lawful
oil and gas rights to three State and three Federal leases in a 640
acre drilling unit and the Forest Supervisor (FS) and the Milwaukee
Field Office Manager (BLM) are required by regulation to evaluate and
decide upon operating plans received from industry for exploration and
development of Federal leases. The agencies must ensure Savoy's
operating plan is consistent with the terms and stipulations of the
Federal mineral leases, applicable laws and regulations, the Huron-
Manistee's Land and Resource Management Plan, and identify any
additional conditions needed to protect Federal resources.
The BLM ultimately renders a decision on the APD, and the Forest
Service must review and decide upon the SUPO before the BLM can make
its APD decision.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes to authorize Savoy to conduct surface
operations associated with accessing, drilling, testing, and completing
the USA and State South Branch 1-8 Well, as described in detail under
Alternative 2: The Proposed Action and described in the Surface Use
Plan of Operations (SUPO) and Application for Permit to Drill (APD)
submitted to the BLM. The Forest Service would approve the Surface Use
Plan of Operations for the USA and State South Branch 1-8 Well.
The BLM proposes to authorize Savoy to conduct operations to drill
test and complete the proposed exploratory well on the subject leases
and approve the APD submitted for this well.
The Forest Service and BLM authorization would include reasonable
and necessary mitigation to ensure Savoy's operations would be in
compliance with law, regulation, and policy.
Savoy holds six subsurface mineral leases included in a 640 acre
drilling unit in South Branch Township (T25N, R1W), Crawford County,
Michigan, Section 7 E \1/2\, Section 8 W \1/2\. This 640 acre drilling
unit includes three State and three Federal oil and gas leases. Savoy
is proposing to drill directionally from National Forest System lands
within the boundaries of the Huron-Manistee National Forests to the
bottomhole located in Federal mineral lease MIES 50521 approximately
2,200 feet NW of the surface hole and construct associated
infrastructure including a production facility and flowline if Savoy
determines the well could produce a commercial product.
Savoy's proposal includes: Leveling of the well pad (approximately
3.5 acres) for the drilling rig, equipment, and pit, including some
minor cut and fill using a bulldozer to level the surface. It also
includes the use, reconstruction and maintenance of existing roads for
year-round access, including snow plowing along portions of River Lake
Road (aka Hickey Creek Road), FSR 4209 (Mason Chapel Road), and FSR
4208, to access the well site; construction and maintenance of 50 feet
of new road, 14 feet wide with three feet of clearing on each side of
the new road (approximately 0.05 acre of disturbance) to access the
well pad from FSR 4208; and drilling a water well at the well pad site
to provide water for drilling and future well maintenance, if needed.
Following these activities drilling equipment would be moved in and
rigged up.
Drilling and well completion would be expected to take 45 days.
Drilling operations would be restricted to a time period of December 1
to April 15. The well pad would be approximately 3.5 acres in size.
Standard and accepted drilling techniques and practices would be used
and must comply with mininum operating standards approved by Michigan
Department of Natural Resouces and Environment and the BLM. This
includes a casing program, pressure control equipment, and proposed
drilling fluids program. Hazardous materials, including stimulation and
completion fluids, would be contained in steel tanks and disposed of by
a licensed waste hauler.
Additional actions proposed if the well is productive include:
construction of a production facility located in SE, Section 9, T25N,
Ri W, (approximately 1.5 miles from the well pad) on approximately 2.0
acres, including intallation of a gas/water separator, oil and brine
tanks, dehydrator, compressor, volume bottle, and measurement
(monitoring) equipment; installation of flowlines from the well site to
the production facility site, buried along side the road bed and a
pipeline to the Michigan Consolidated Gas transmission line, totaling
approximately 1.7 miles, and reclamation of the well pad, following
drilling and completion, leaving \1/3\ acre used for well operations.
If the well is not capable of commercial production, the operator
plug and abandon the well under applicable State and BLM rules.
Reclamation of the site according to the reclamation plan included with
the SUPO would occur within six months of completion of well plugging.
This would include: Recontouring and stabilizing all excavations,
topsoil removed during leveling will be spread evenly over the site
except the roads; the site would be seeded with a Forest Service
approved mix; the flowline route would be restored and the 50 foot
access road would be obliterated.
Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment's Water
Management Practices on Forest Land will be used to manage the roads.
Additionally, prior to reconstructing FSR 4209, approximately 150 feet
of silt fence would be placed per FS direction adjacent to the south
side of the road for wetland protection.
The operator would maintain a dike around the condensate and brine
tanks at the production facility of sufficient size and height so as to
contain 150% of the total capacity of the tanks.
The width of the reconstucted roads would not exceed 14 feet. An
additional 3 feet of clearing would be done on each side of the road.
Clearing width would not exceed 20 feet.
Soil disturbed with the placement of the flowline/pipeline would be
seeded with mix specified by the Forest Service.
Roads into the well pad and production facility would be gated and
locked.
Road design and construction would take into account visual
quality.
Minimization of noise is to be emphasized during drilling,
completion, and production operations. Hospital-type engine mufflers
would be used on drilling, completion, and work over rigs, mud pumps,
and compressors. No pumps or motors would be placed on the surface of
the well or at the well site. The total sound level for the production
facility would not exceed 36 dBA at 1,320 feet if more than one well is
being processed. If the production facility is processing gas from one
well, the sound level would not exceed 33 dBA at 1,320 feet. The
production facility would be constructed to meet these sound levels.
Off-road equipment would be inspected by a Forest Service
representative and washed if needed to prevent introduction of non-
native invasive plants that are not already present in the project
area.
Protection will be provided for Endangered, Threatened and
Sensitive Species in accordance with law, regulation and policy.
The Forest Service, the BLM, and MDNRE will coordinate inspections
to ensure compliance with requirements.
[[Page 8299]]
Possible Alternatives
No Action alternative: The Forest Service would not approve the
SUPO and br the BLM would not approve the APD. Current direction would
continue to guide management of the project area. The USA and State
South Branch 1-8 well would not be drilled, no flow lines would be
installed, and no production facility would be constructed.
Alternative 2: Modification of Savoy's Proposal--The Forest Service
would approve the SUPO and the BLM would approve the APD subject to
additional conditions of approval necessary for resource protection.
Alternative 2 would be the same as the proposed action except with
additional conditions of approval to the SUPO and APD based on
mitigation developed to respond to the issues raised.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The BLM and the Forest Service entered into an Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) in April 2006 ``to establish procedures for the
coordinated dministration of oil and gas operations on Federal leases
within the National Forest System (NFS).'' The MOU identifies the
responsibilities of the agencies to provide efficient, effective
adherence to rules and regulations for each. Specifically, the MOU
states,
``111A3. `* * * the Forest Service has the full responsibility
and authority to approve and regulate all suface -disturbing
activities associated with oil and gas exploration and development
through analysis and approval of the SUPO component of an APD.' ''
VB] Forest Service will: Serve as lead agency for oil and gas * * *
environmental analyses required for APD: * * *''
``111A2. The BLM has the authority and responsibility to provide
final approval of all APDs, including those for operations on
Federals leases on NFS lands * * * The BLM has the authority and
responsibility to regulate all down-hole operations and directly
related surface activities and use, and provide approval of the
drilling plan and final approval of the APD on NFS lands.''
This MOU is consistent with the NEPA regulations, 40 CFR 1501.5
Lead Agency and 1501.6 Cooperating Agencies, identifying the Forest
Service as the lead agency and the BLM as the cooperating agency.
Responsible Official for Lead Agency
Barry Paulson, Forest Supervisor, Huron-Manistee National Forests,
1755 S. Mitchell Street, Cadillac, MI 49601.
Responsible Official for Cooperating Agency
Mark Storzer, Field Manager, Bureau of Land Management, Milwaukee
Field Office, 626 E Wisconsin Ave. Suite 200, Milwaukee, WI 53202-46
17.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor of the Huron-Manistee National Forests will
issue a decision on whether to approve, approve subject to specified
conditions, or disapprove for stated reasons, the proposed Surface Use
Plan of Operations or development of the well and construction and
operation of the flowline/pipeline and production facilities.
Similarly, the BLM Field Manager in Milwaukee will issue a decision on
whether to approve the Application for Permit to Drill as submitted,
approve subject to appropriate modifications or conditions, or
disapprove for stated reasons.
Preliminary Issues
We expect issues to include possible effects of noise, odor and
changes to the visual quality from the project on anglers and visitors
to the Semi-Primitive Nonmotorized area and Mason Tract, as well as the
possible effects of the project on tourism in the county.
Permits and Licenses Required
Savoy will be required to obtain a State permit for drilling from
the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. The Forest
Service plans to scope for information by contacting persons and
organizations interested or potentially affected by the proposed action
by using mailings, public announcements, and personal contacts.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions. The submission of
timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to
participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review.
We are especially interested in information that might identify a
specific undesired result of implementing the proposed action. Comments
will be used to help formulate alternatives to the proposed action.
Please make your written comments as specific as possible as they
relate to the proposed action, and include your name, address, and if
possible, telephone number and e-mail address.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposed action and will be available for public
inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not have
standing to appeal the subsequent decisions under 36 CFR part 215.
Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any persons may request the
agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing how
the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) permits such confidentiality.
Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that under FOIA
confidentiality may be granted in only very limited circumstances, such
as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service will inform the
requester of the agency's decision regarding the request for
confidentiality and, should the request be denied, return the
submission and notify the requester that the comments may be
resubmitted with or without name and address within 90 days.
Dated: February 16, 2010.
Barry Paulson,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-3587 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
