Patrick J. Lais: Debarment Order, 8081-8082 [2010-3552]
Download as PDF
8081
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
TABLE A.12–1 ESTIMATES OF HOUR BURDEN—Continued
Number of respondents
Type of respondents
Estimated number of responses
per respondent
Average burden
hours per response
0.5
Accepted Donors .........................................................................
* 12
1
Total ......................................................................................
408
............................
..............................
Estimated total
annual burden
hours requested
6
83.64
* These respondents are a subgroup of total 408 donors who will be initially contacted to participate in the study.
Request for Comments: Written
comments and/or suggestions from the
public and affected agencies should
address one or more of the following
points: (1) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the function of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) Minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
For Further Information Contact: To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, contact Dr. George Nemo,
Project Officer, NHLBI, Two Rockledge
Center, Room 9144, 6701 Rockledge
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892–7950, or
call 301–435–0075, or E-mail your
request to nemog@nih.gov.
Comments Due Date: Comments
regarding this information collection are
best assured of having their full effect if
received within 60 days of the date of
this publication.
Dated: February 16, 2010.
George Nemo,
NHLBI Project Officer, NHLBI, National
Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–3449 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0585]
Patrick J. Lais: Debarment Order
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is issuing an
order under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the act) permanently
debarring Patrick J. Lais from providing
services in any capacity to a person that
has an approved or pending drug
product application. We base this order
on a finding that Mr. Lais was convicted
of a felony under Federal law for
conduct relating to the regulation of a
drug product under the act. Mr. Lais has
notified FDA that he acquiesces to
debarment, and therefore has waived his
opportunity for a hearing concerning
this action.
DATES: This order is effective February
23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit applications for
special termination of debarment to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenny Shade, Office of Regulatory
Affairs (HFC–230), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 240–632–6844.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On April 25, 2005, Mr. Patrick J. Lais,
formerly president of York
Pharmaceutical, pleaded guilty to
introducing and delivering, and causing
to be introduced and delivered into
interstate commerce, a drug that was
adulterated within the meaning of 21
U.S.C. 351(a)(2)(B) of the act, a felony
under Federal law in violation of 21
U.S.C. 331(a) and 333(a)(2). Judgment
was entered against him for this felony
on August 15, 2005. The basis for this
conviction was as follows:
Beginning in 1997 and lasting until
September 2001, Mr. Lais was the
president of York Pharmaceutical
(York). Mr. Lais had responsibility for
and authority over drug manufacturing
at York. York manufactured generic
over-the-counter drugs during the
period January 1999 through July 2001.
York distributed in interstate
commerce human drug products that
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
were adulterated within the meaning of
21 U.S.C. 351(a)(2)(B) of the act, in that
York manufactured and distributed,
among other things, subpotent burn
spray, aspirin that had failed dissolution
testing, and antacid products
contaminated with bacteria.
Mr. Lais knew that York’s
manufacturing facility lacked basic
validation processes and controls and
that York’s drug products were
adulterated within the meaning of the
act. Mr. Lais also knew that York: (1)
Did not use procedures that ensured
that its drugs had the identity, strength,
quality, and purity characteristics that
they were represented to possess; (2) did
not test raw materials before using them;
(3) did not perform appropriate
laboratory determinations of
conformance with final specifications
for each of its drug products; (4)
shipped drug product known not to
meet established quality control criteria;
(5) frequently failed to assess the
stability characteristics of the drugs it
produced; (6) did not maintain the
buildings used in the manufacture,
processing, packing, and holding of its
drug products in a clean and sanitary
condition; and (7) did not clean,
maintain, and sanitize its manufacturing
equipment and utensils in such a way
as to prevent contamination of final
drug products.
In January 2000, York manufactured
and compressed a drug product
identified as ‘‘Uncoated Aspirin.’’ This
drug failed its final dissolution testing.
Neither Mr. Lais nor the employees
under his authority and control
determined the cause of the dissolution
failure. Rather, York coated the failed
aspirin and renumbered the lot. Part of
this lot then was packaged as ‘‘Coated
Aspirin.’’ On or about February 21,
2000, Mr. Lais caused the shipment of
625 cases of adulterated drug products,
identified as ‘‘Coated Aspirin,’’ to
customers in Kansas City, MO. In May
2000, this ‘‘Coated Aspirin’’ failed 3–
month stability testing. Mr. Lais and the
employees under his authority and
control did not determine the cause of
the failure and did not inform York’s
customers that the aspirin was
adulterated.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
8082
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Mr. Lais is subject to debarment based
on a finding, under section 306(a)(2)(B)
of the act (21 U.S.C. 355a(a)(2)(B)), that
he was convicted of a felony under
Federal law for conduct relating to the
regulation of a drug product.
In the plea agreement entered on
April 25, 2005, Mr. Lais expressly
waived his right, if any, to contest any
debarment that may be initiated by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
under 21 U.S.C.335a. In accordance
with section 306(c)(2)(B) of the act, Mr.
Lais notified FDA of his acquiescence to
debarment in a letter signed on October
3, 2006. A person subject to debarment
is entitled to an opportunity for an
agency hearing on disputed issues of
material fact under section 306(i) of the
act, but by acquiescing to debarment Mr.
Lais waived his opportunity for a
hearing and to raise any contentions
concerning his debarment.
II. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Acting Director, Office
of Enforcement, Office of Regulatory
Affairs, under section 306(a)(2)(B) of the
act, under authority delegated to the
Acting Director (Staff Manual Guide
1410.35), finds that Patrick J. Lais has
been convicted of a felony under
Federal law for conduct relating to the
regulation of a drug product under the
act.
As a result of the foregoing finding
and based on his notification of
acquiescence, Mr. Lais is permanently
debarred from providing services in any
capacity to a person with an approved
or pending drug product application
under sections 505, 512, or 802 of the
act (21 U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or
under section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective
October 3, 2006, the date of notification
of acquiescence (see sections
306(c)(1)(B), (c)(2)(A)(ii), and 201(dd) of
the act (21 U.S.C. 321(dd))). Any person
with an approved or pending drug
product application who knowingly
employs or retains as a consultant or
contractor, or otherwise uses the
services of Patrick J. Lais, in any
capacity during Mr. Lais’s debarment,
will be subject to civil money penalties
(section 307(a)(6) of the act (21 U.S.C.
335b(a)(6))). If Mr. Lais provides
services in any capacity to a person with
an approved or pending drug product
application during his period of
debarment he will be subject to civil
money penalties (section 307(a)(7) of the
act). In addition, FDA will not accept or
review any abbreviated new drug
applications submitted by or with the
assistance of Mr. Lais during his period
of debarment (section 306(c)(1)(B) of the
act).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Any application by Mr. Lais for
special termination of debarment under
section 306(d)(4) of the act should be
identified with Docket No. FDA–2009–
N–0585 and sent to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES).
All such submissions are to be filed in
four copies. The public availability of
information in these submissions is
governed by 21 CFR 10.20(j).
Publicly available submissions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: January 26, 2010.
Brenda Holman,
Acting Director, Office of Enforcement, Office
of Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010–3552 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Government-Owned Inventions;
Availability for Licensing
AGENCY: National Institutes of Health,
Public Health Service, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The inventions listed below
are owned by an agency of the U.S.
Government and are available for
licensing in the U.S. in accordance with
35 U.S.C. 207 to achieve expeditious
commercialization of results of
federally-funded research and
development. Foreign patent
applications are filed on selected
inventions to extend market coverage
for companies and may also be available
for licensing.
ADDRESSES: Licensing information and
copies of the U.S. patent applications
listed below may be obtained by writing
to the indicated licensing contact at the
Office of Technology Transfer, National
Institutes of Health, 6011 Executive
Boulevard, Suite 325, Rockville,
Maryland 20852–3804; telephone: 301/
496–7057; fax: 301/402–0220. A signed
Confidential Disclosure Agreement will
be required to receive copies of the
patent applications.
Automated Computer-Aided Polyp
Detection for Computed Tomography
Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy)
Description of Invention: This
invention describes an automated
method for colon registration from
supine and prone scans that combines
the use of Computed Tomographic
Colonography (CTC) and Computer
Aided Detection (CAD) software.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Currently, in order to detect colonic
polyps, patients are scanned twice—
once in the supine, and again in the
prone positions. This approach
improves CTC sensitivity by reducing
the extent of non-interpretable collapsed
or fluid-filled segments. In order to
assist radiologists in interpreting CTC
data or evaluating colonic polyp
candidates detected by CAD in both
scans, it is important to provide not
only the locations of suspicious polyps,
but also the possible matched pairs
(correspondences) of polyps in these
scans. To achieve this, the two scans
need to be aligned. In this invention, the
colon registration problem is formulated
as time series matching along the
centerline of the colon. Anatomically
salient points on the colon are initially
distinguished as they can be viewed as
landmarks along the central path of the
colon. Correlation optimized warping is
then applied to the segments defined by
the anatomical landmarks to find better
global registration based on the local
correlation of segments.
When CTC is performed in
conjunction with CAD software,
screening may become easier on
patients, less time-consuming, and more
accurate. The effectiveness of the
method was verified in experiments in
which the polyp location was used as a
measure for the registration error. The
algorithm was tested on a CTC dataset
of 12 patients with 14 polyps.
Experimental results showed that by
using this method, the estimation error
of polyp location could be reduced
60.4% (from 47.2mm to18.7mm on
average) compared to a traditional
method based on dynamic time
warping.
Colon cancer is the second leading
cause of cancer-related deaths in the
United States, and the method used in
this invention will aid in effective early
detection of the disease, which will
have a significant impact on its
prognosis.
Applications: Efficient and robust
detection of colon cancer.
Development Status: Early stage.
Inventors: Ronald M. Summers et al.
(NIHCC).
Related Publication: Huang A, Roy D,
Franaszek M, Summers RM. Teniae coli
guided navigation and registration for
virtual colonoscopy. Visualization,
2005. VIS 05. IEEE, pp. 279–285, 23–28
Oct 2005; doi 10.1109/
VISUAL.2005.1532806.
Patent Status: U.S. Patent Application
No. 61/220,481 filed June 25, 2009 (HHS
Reference No. E–135–2009/0–US–01).
Licensing Status: Available for
licensing.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8081-8082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3552]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0585]
Patrick J. Lais: Debarment Order
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing an order
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) permanently
debarring Patrick J. Lais from providing services in any capacity to a
person that has an approved or pending drug product application. We
base this order on a finding that Mr. Lais was convicted of a felony
under Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of a drug
product under the act. Mr. Lais has notified FDA that he acquiesces to
debarment, and therefore has waived his opportunity for a hearing
concerning this action.
DATES: This order is effective February 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit applications for special termination of debarment to
the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenny Shade, Office of Regulatory
Affairs (HFC-230), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 240-632-6844.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On April 25, 2005, Mr. Patrick J. Lais, formerly president of York
Pharmaceutical, pleaded guilty to introducing and delivering, and
causing to be introduced and delivered into interstate commerce, a drug
that was adulterated within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 351(a)(2)(B) of
the act, a felony under Federal law in violation of 21 U.S.C. 331(a)
and 333(a)(2). Judgment was entered against him for this felony on
August 15, 2005. The basis for this conviction was as follows:
Beginning in 1997 and lasting until September 2001, Mr. Lais was
the president of York Pharmaceutical (York). Mr. Lais had
responsibility for and authority over drug manufacturing at York. York
manufactured generic over-the-counter drugs during the period January
1999 through July 2001.
York distributed in interstate commerce human drug products that
were adulterated within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 351(a)(2)(B) of the
act, in that York manufactured and distributed, among other things,
subpotent burn spray, aspirin that had failed dissolution testing, and
antacid products contaminated with bacteria.
Mr. Lais knew that York's manufacturing facility lacked basic
validation processes and controls and that York's drug products were
adulterated within the meaning of the act. Mr. Lais also knew that
York: (1) Did not use procedures that ensured that its drugs had the
identity, strength, quality, and purity characteristics that they were
represented to possess; (2) did not test raw materials before using
them; (3) did not perform appropriate laboratory determinations of
conformance with final specifications for each of its drug products;
(4) shipped drug product known not to meet established quality control
criteria; (5) frequently failed to assess the stability characteristics
of the drugs it produced; (6) did not maintain the buildings used in
the manufacture, processing, packing, and holding of its drug products
in a clean and sanitary condition; and (7) did not clean, maintain, and
sanitize its manufacturing equipment and utensils in such a way as to
prevent contamination of final drug products.
In January 2000, York manufactured and compressed a drug product
identified as ``Uncoated Aspirin.'' This drug failed its final
dissolution testing. Neither Mr. Lais nor the employees under his
authority and control determined the cause of the dissolution failure.
Rather, York coated the failed aspirin and renumbered the lot. Part of
this lot then was packaged as ``Coated Aspirin.'' On or about February
21, 2000, Mr. Lais caused the shipment of 625 cases of adulterated drug
products, identified as ``Coated Aspirin,'' to customers in Kansas
City, MO. In May 2000, this ``Coated Aspirin'' failed 3-month stability
testing. Mr. Lais and the employees under his authority and control did
not determine the cause of the failure and did not inform York's
customers that the aspirin was adulterated.
[[Page 8082]]
Mr. Lais is subject to debarment based on a finding, under section
306(a)(2)(B) of the act (21 U.S.C. 355a(a)(2)(B)), that he was
convicted of a felony under Federal law for conduct relating to the
regulation of a drug product.
In the plea agreement entered on April 25, 2005, Mr. Lais expressly
waived his right, if any, to contest any debarment that may be
initiated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under 21
U.S.C.335a. In accordance with section 306(c)(2)(B) of the act, Mr.
Lais notified FDA of his acquiescence to debarment in a letter signed
on October 3, 2006. A person subject to debarment is entitled to an
opportunity for an agency hearing on disputed issues of material fact
under section 306(i) of the act, but by acquiescing to debarment Mr.
Lais waived his opportunity for a hearing and to raise any contentions
concerning his debarment.
II. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Acting Director, Office of Enforcement, Office of
Regulatory Affairs, under section 306(a)(2)(B) of the act, under
authority delegated to the Acting Director (Staff Manual Guide
1410.35), finds that Patrick J. Lais has been convicted of a felony
under Federal law for conduct relating to the regulation of a drug
product under the act.
As a result of the foregoing finding and based on his notification
of acquiescence, Mr. Lais is permanently debarred from providing
services in any capacity to a person with an approved or pending drug
product application under sections 505, 512, or 802 of the act (21
U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or under section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective October 3, 2006, the date of
notification of acquiescence (see sections 306(c)(1)(B), (c)(2)(A)(ii),
and 201(dd) of the act (21 U.S.C. 321(dd))). Any person with an
approved or pending drug product application who knowingly employs or
retains as a consultant or contractor, or otherwise uses the services
of Patrick J. Lais, in any capacity during Mr. Lais's debarment, will
be subject to civil money penalties (section 307(a)(6) of the act (21
U.S.C. 335b(a)(6))). If Mr. Lais provides services in any capacity to a
person with an approved or pending drug product application during his
period of debarment he will be subject to civil money penalties
(section 307(a)(7) of the act). In addition, FDA will not accept or
review any abbreviated new drug applications submitted by or with the
assistance of Mr. Lais during his period of debarment (section
306(c)(1)(B) of the act).
Any application by Mr. Lais for special termination of debarment
under section 306(d)(4) of the act should be identified with Docket No.
FDA-2009-N-0585 and sent to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES). All such submissions are to be filed in four copies. The
public availability of information in these submissions is governed by
21 CFR 10.20(j).
Publicly available submissions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: January 26, 2010.
Brenda Holman,
Acting Director, Office of Enforcement, Office of Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-3552 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S