WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding United States-Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Shrimp From Viet Nam, 8177-8178 [2010-3551]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
Room 1205, to discuss declassification
and transfer of Department of State
records to the National Archives and
Records Administration and the status
of the Foreign Relations series. The
remainder of the Committee’s sessions
from 2:45 p.m. until 5 p.m. on Monday,
March 1, 2010 and 9 a.m. until 12 p.m.
on Tuesday, March 2, 2010, will be
closed in accordance with Section 10(d)
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463). The agenda calls for
discussions of agency declassification
decisions concerning the Foreign
Relations series and other
declassification issues. These are
matters properly classified and not
subject to public disclosure under 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and the public interest
requires that such activities be withheld
from disclosure. Questions concerning
the meeting should be directed to
Ambassador Edward Brynn, Executive
Secretary, Advisory Committee on
Historical Diplomatic Documentation,
Department of State, Office of the
Historian, Washington, DC, 20520,
telephone (202) 663–1123, (e-mail
history@state.gov).
In accordance with 41 CFR 102–
3.150(b), the Department finds
exceptional circumstances for giving
less than 15 calendar days notice. The
meeting must be held on March 1–2 due
to the availability of the members of the
Advisory Committee; however,
publication of the notice was delayed
because of unforeseen and exceptional
weather emergencies that necessitated
closing Federal offices or curtailing
government activities for a significant
period of time in Washington DC,
including at the Department of State and
the Office of the Federal Register.
Dated: February 16, 2010.
Edward Brynn,
Executive Secretary, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–3564 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–11–P
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Docket No. WTO/DS404]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding
Regarding United States—AntiDumping Measures on Certain Shrimp
From Viet Nam
AGENCY: Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
SUMMARY: The Office of the United
States Trade Representative (‘‘USTR’’) is
providing notice that on February 1,
2010, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
(‘‘Vietnam’’) requested consultations
with the United States under the
Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the
World Trade Organization (‘‘WTO
Agreement’’) concerning a number of
antidumping administrative reviews
and new shipper reviews conducted by
the Department of Commerce on
imports of certain frozen warmwater
shrimp from Vietnam (Investigation A–
552–801), and various U.S. laws,
regulations, administrative procedures,
practices, and methodologies. That
request may be found at https://
www.wto.org contained in a document
designated as WT/DS404/1. USTR
invites written comments from the
public concerning the issues raised in
this dispute.
DATES: Although USTR will accept any
comments received during the course of
the dispute settlement proceedings,
comments should be submitted on or
before March 15, 2010 to be assured of
timely consideration by USTR.
ADDRESSES: Public comments should be
submitted electronically to https://
www.regulations.gov, docket number
USTR–2010–0008. If you are unable to
submit comments using https://
www.regulations.gov, please contact
Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to
arrange for an alternative method of
transmission. If (as explained below) the
comments contain confidential
information, then the comments should
be submitted by fax only to Sandy
McKinzy at (202) 395–3640.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J.
Daniel Stirk, Associate General Counsel,
Office of the United States Trade
Representative, 600 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395–9617.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is
providing notice that consultations have
been requested pursuant to the WTO
Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes
(‘‘DSU’’). If such consultations should
fail to resolve the matter and a dispute
settlement panel is established pursuant
to the DSU, such panel, which would
hold its meetings in Geneva,
Switzerland, would be expected to issue
a report on its findings and
recommendations within nine months
after it is established.
Major Issues Raised by Vietnam
On February 1, 2010, Vietnam
requested consultations regarding a
number of antidumping administrative
reviews and new shipper reviews
conducted by the Department of
Commerce on certain frozen warmwater
shrimp from Vietnam, referring in
particular to the use of what it describes
as ‘‘zeroing’’ in those reviews. Vietnam
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8177
challenges the determinations by the
Department of Commerce in (1) Certain
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final
Results of the First Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 72 FR 52,052
(September 12, 2007), as well as any
assessment instructions and cash
deposit requirements issued pursuant
thereto; (2) Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Final Results and Final Partial
Recission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 73 FR 52,273
(September 9, 2008), as well as any
assessment instructions and cash
deposit requirements issued pursuant
thereto; (3) Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Final Results of the Second
New Shipper Review, 74 FR 24,796 (May
26, 2009), as well as any assessment
instructions and cash deposit
requirements issued pursuant thereto;
(4) Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Final Results and Final Partial Recission
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 74 FR 47,191 (September 15,
2009), as well as any assessment
instructions and cash deposit
requirements issued pursuant thereto;
(5) preliminary and final results of any
administrative reviews or other reviews
of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
published in the Federal Register after
the date of the request for consultations,
including reviews under Section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as well as any
assessment instructions and cash
deposit requirements issued pursuant
thereto; (6) any changes in the final
results of any administrative review of
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
issued pursuant to a remand from the
U.S. Court of International Trade, as
well as any opinion of the Court related
to the remand results, and any
assessment instructions and cash
deposit requirements issued pursuant
thereto; and (7) any actions taken by
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to
collect definitive antidumping duties at
duty assessment rates established in the
administrative reviews identified above,
including through the issuance of
liquidation instructions and notices.
Vietnam also challenges various U.S.
laws, regulations, administrative
procedures, practices, and
methodologies, including (1) the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, in particular
sections 736, 751, 771(35)(A) and (B),
and 777A(c) and (d) (19 U.S.C. 1673e,
1675, 1677(35)(A) and (B), and 1677f(c)
and (d)); (2) the Statement of
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
8178
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
Administrative Action accompanying
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,
H.R. Doc. No. 103–316 (1994), reprinted
in 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040; (3)
Department of Commerce regulations set
forth in part 351 of Title 19 of the Code
of Federal Regulations, in particular
sections 351.212(b) and 351.414(c) and
(e); (4) the Import Administration
Antidumping Manual (1997 ed.),
including the computer programs
referenced therein; and (5) the general
procedures and methodology employed
by the United States to determine
dumping margins in administrative
reviews, whereby the Department of
Commerce, in comparing weighted
average normal value with the
transaction price of individual export
transactions, treats as zero negative
intermediate comparison results (i.e.,
situations in which the individual
export price is greater than the weighted
average normal value), which
methodology Vietnam asserts is
commonly referred to as ‘‘simple
zeroing’’ and/or the U.S. ‘‘zeroing
procedures.’’
Vietnam alleges that these laws,
regulations, administrative procedures,
practices, and methodologies are, as
such and as applied in the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce and actions by U.S. Customs
and Border Protection in the shrimp
administrative reviews and new shipper
reviews, inconsistent with Articles I, II,
VI:1, and VI:2 of the General Agreement
on Tariffs and Trade 1994; Articles 1,
2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 6.8, 6.10, 9.1, 9.3, 9.4,
11.2, 11.3, 18.1, and 18.4, and Annex II
of the Agreement on Implementation of
Article VI of the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade 1994 (the AntiDumping Agreement); Article XVI:4 of
the WTO Agreement; and Vietnam’s
Protocol of Accession to the WTO.
Vietnam alleges that the United States
acted inconsistently with the WTO
Agreement obligations identified above
by applying so-called ‘‘zeroing’’ in the
determination of the margins of
dumping in the reviews identified
above, by repeatedly and consistently
failing to provide most Vietnamese
respondents seeking a review an
opportunity to demonstrate the absence
of dumping by being permitted to
participate in a review, and by requiring
companies to demonstrate their
independence from government control
and applying an adverse facts available
rate to companies failing to do so in all
reviews.
Public Comment: Requirements for
Submissions
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments concerning
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
the issues raised in this dispute. Persons
may submit public comments
electronically to https://
www.regulations.gov docket number
USTR–2010–0008. If you are unable to
submit comments using https://
www.regulations.gov, please contact
Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to
arrange for an alternative method of
transmission.
To submit comments via https://
www.regulations.gov, enter docket
number USTR–2010–0008 on the home
page and click ‘‘search.’’ The site will
provide a search-results page listing all
documents associated with this docket.
Find a reference to this notice by
selecting ‘‘Notice’’ under ‘‘Document
Type’’ on the left side of the search
results page, and click on the link
entitled ‘‘Submit a Comment.’’ (For
further information on using the http:
//www.regulations.gov Web site, please
consult the resources provided on the
Web site by clicking on the ‘‘Help’’ link
at the top of the home page.)
The https://www.regulations.gov Web
site provides the option of providing
comments by filling in a ‘‘Type
Comment and Upload File’’ field, or by
attaching a document. It is expected that
most comments will be provided in an
attached document. If a document is
attached, it is necessary and sufficient to
type ‘‘See attached’’ in the ‘‘Type
Comment and Upload File’’ field.
A person requesting that information
contained in a comment submitted by
that person be treated as business
confidential information must certify
that such information is business
confidential and would not customarily
be released to the public by the
submitter. Business confidential
information must be clearly designated
as such and the submission must be
marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ at
the top and bottom of the cover page
and each succeeding page. Any
comment containing business
confidential information must be
submitted by fax to Sandy McKinzy at
(202) 395–3640. A non-confidential
summary of the confidential
information must be submitted to http:
//www.regulations.gov. The nonconfidential summary will be placed in
the docket and open to public
inspection.
Information or advice contained in a
comment submitted, other than business
confidential information, may be
determined by USTR to be confidential
in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of
the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that
information or advice may qualify as
such, the submitter—
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(1) Must clearly so designate the
information or advice;
(2) Must clearly mark the material as
‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the
top and bottom of the cover page and
each succeeding page; and
(3) Must provide a non-confidential
summary of the information or advice.
Any comment containing confidential
information must be submitted by fax to
Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–3640. A
non-confidential summary of the
confidential information must be
submitted to https://
www.regulations.gov. The nonconfidential summary will be placed in
the docket and open to public
inspection.
USTR will maintain a docket on this
dispute settlement proceeding
accessible to the public. The public file
will include non-confidential comments
received by USTR from the public with
respect to the dispute; if a dispute
settlement panel is convened or in the
event of an appeal from such a panel,
the U.S. submissions, any nonconfidential submissions, or nonconfidential summaries of submissions,
received from other participants in the
dispute; the report of the panel; and, if
applicable, the report of the Appellate
Body.
Comments will be placed in the
docket and open to public inspection
pursuant to 15 CFR 2006.13, except
confidential business information
exempt from public inspection in
accordance with 15 CFR 2006.15 or
information determined by USTR to be
confidential in accordance with 19
U.S.C. 2155(g)(2). Comments open to
public inspection may be viewed on the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site.
Steven F. Fabry,
Acting Assistant United States Trade
Representative for Monitoring and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2010–3551 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190–W0–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Application of Rugby Aviation LLC D/
B/A Northwest Sky Ferry for Commuter
Air Carrier Authority
Department of Transportation.
Notice of Order to Show Cause
(Order 2010–2–7) Docket OST–2009–
0188.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Transportation is directing all interested
persons to show cause why it should
not issue an order finding Rugby
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8177-8178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3551]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Docket No. WTO/DS404]
WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding United States--Anti-
Dumping Measures on Certain Shrimp From Viet Nam
AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative
(``USTR'') is providing notice that on February 1, 2010, the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam (``Vietnam'') requested consultations with the
United States under the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World
Trade Organization (``WTO Agreement'') concerning a number of
antidumping administrative reviews and new shipper reviews conducted by
the Department of Commerce on imports of certain frozen warmwater
shrimp from Vietnam (Investigation A-552-801), and various U.S. laws,
regulations, administrative procedures, practices, and methodologies.
That request may be found at https://www.wto.org contained in a document
designated as WT/DS404/1. USTR invites written comments from the public
concerning the issues raised in this dispute.
DATES: Although USTR will accept any comments received during the
course of the dispute settlement proceedings, comments should be
submitted on or before March 15, 2010 to be assured of timely
consideration by USTR.
ADDRESSES: Public comments should be submitted electronically to https://www.regulations.gov, docket number USTR-2010-0008. If you are unable
to submit comments using https://www.regulations.gov, please contact
Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-9483 to arrange for an alternative method of
transmission. If (as explained below) the comments contain confidential
information, then the comments should be submitted by fax only to Sandy
McKinzy at (202) 395-3640.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Daniel Stirk, Associate General
Counsel, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395-9617.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is providing notice that consultations
have been requested pursuant to the WTO Understanding on Rules and
Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (``DSU''). If such
consultations should fail to resolve the matter and a dispute
settlement panel is established pursuant to the DSU, such panel, which
would hold its meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, would be expected to
issue a report on its findings and recommendations within nine months
after it is established.
Major Issues Raised by Vietnam
On February 1, 2010, Vietnam requested consultations regarding a
number of antidumping administrative reviews and new shipper reviews
conducted by the Department of Commerce on certain frozen warmwater
shrimp from Vietnam, referring in particular to the use of what it
describes as ``zeroing'' in those reviews. Vietnam challenges the
determinations by the Department of Commerce in (1) Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results
of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 52,052
(September 12, 2007), as well as any assessment instructions and cash
deposit requirements issued pursuant thereto; (2) Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results
and Final Partial Recission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
73 FR 52,273 (September 9, 2008), as well as any assessment
instructions and cash deposit requirements issued pursuant thereto; (3)
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Final Results of the Second New Shipper Review, 74 FR 24,796 (May 26,
2009), as well as any assessment instructions and cash deposit
requirements issued pursuant thereto; (4) Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Final
Partial Recission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR
47,191 (September 15, 2009), as well as any assessment instructions and
cash deposit requirements issued pursuant thereto; (5) preliminary and
final results of any administrative reviews or other reviews of Certain
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
published in the Federal Register after the date of the request for
consultations, including reviews under Section 751(c) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as well as any assessment instructions and cash deposit
requirements issued pursuant thereto; (6) any changes in the final
results of any administrative review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam issued pursuant to a remand from
the U.S. Court of International Trade, as well as any opinion of the
Court related to the remand results, and any assessment instructions
and cash deposit requirements issued pursuant thereto; and (7) any
actions taken by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect
definitive antidumping duties at duty assessment rates established in
the administrative reviews identified above, including through the
issuance of liquidation instructions and notices. Vietnam also
challenges various U.S. laws, regulations, administrative procedures,
practices, and methodologies, including (1) the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, in particular sections 736, 751, 771(35)(A) and (B), and
777A(c) and (d) (19 U.S.C. 1673e, 1675, 1677(35)(A) and (B), and
1677f(c) and (d)); (2) the Statement of
[[Page 8178]]
Administrative Action accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,
H.R. Doc. No. 103-316 (1994), reprinted in 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040; (3)
Department of Commerce regulations set forth in part 351 of Title 19 of
the Code of Federal Regulations, in particular sections 351.212(b) and
351.414(c) and (e); (4) the Import Administration Antidumping Manual
(1997 ed.), including the computer programs referenced therein; and (5)
the general procedures and methodology employed by the United States to
determine dumping margins in administrative reviews, whereby the
Department of Commerce, in comparing weighted average normal value with
the transaction price of individual export transactions, treats as zero
negative intermediate comparison results (i.e., situations in which the
individual export price is greater than the weighted average normal
value), which methodology Vietnam asserts is commonly referred to as
``simple zeroing'' and/or the U.S. ``zeroing procedures.''
Vietnam alleges that these laws, regulations, administrative
procedures, practices, and methodologies are, as such and as applied in
the determinations by the Department of Commerce and actions by U.S.
Customs and Border Protection in the shrimp administrative reviews and
new shipper reviews, inconsistent with Articles I, II, VI:1, and VI:2
of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994; Articles 1, 2.1,
2.4, 2.4.2, 6.8, 6.10, 9.1, 9.3, 9.4, 11.2, 11.3, 18.1, and 18.4, and
Annex II of the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (the Anti-Dumping
Agreement); Article XVI:4 of the WTO Agreement; and Vietnam's Protocol
of Accession to the WTO.
Vietnam alleges that the United States acted inconsistently with
the WTO Agreement obligations identified above by applying so-called
``zeroing'' in the determination of the margins of dumping in the
reviews identified above, by repeatedly and consistently failing to
provide most Vietnamese respondents seeking a review an opportunity to
demonstrate the absence of dumping by being permitted to participate in
a review, and by requiring companies to demonstrate their independence
from government control and applying an adverse facts available rate to
companies failing to do so in all reviews.
Public Comment: Requirements for Submissions
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning the issues raised in this dispute. Persons may submit public
comments electronically to https://www.regulations.gov docket number
USTR-2010-0008. If you are unable to submit comments using https://www.regulations.gov, please contact Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-9483 to
arrange for an alternative method of transmission.
To submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov, enter docket
number USTR-2010-0008 on the home page and click ``search.'' The site
will provide a search-results page listing all documents associated
with this docket. Find a reference to this notice by selecting
``Notice'' under ``Document Type'' on the left side of the search
results page, and click on the link entitled ``Submit a Comment.'' (For
further information on using the https://www.regulations.gov Web site,
please consult the resources provided on the Web site by clicking on
the ``Help'' link at the top of the home page.)
The https://www.regulations.gov Web site provides the option of
providing comments by filling in a ``Type Comment and Upload File''
field, or by attaching a document. It is expected that most comments
will be provided in an attached document. If a document is attached, it
is necessary and sufficient to type ``See attached'' in the ``Type
Comment and Upload File'' field.
A person requesting that information contained in a comment
submitted by that person be treated as business confidential
information must certify that such information is business confidential
and would not customarily be released to the public by the submitter.
Business confidential information must be clearly designated as such
and the submission must be marked ``BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL'' at the top
and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page. Any comment
containing business confidential information must be submitted by fax
to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-3640. A non-confidential summary of the
confidential information must be submitted to https://www.regulations.gov. The non-confidential summary will be placed in the
docket and open to public inspection.
Information or advice contained in a comment submitted, other than
business confidential information, may be determined by USTR to be
confidential in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of the Trade Act of
1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that information
or advice may qualify as such, the submitter--
(1) Must clearly so designate the information or advice;
(2) Must clearly mark the material as ``SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE''
at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page; and
(3) Must provide a non-confidential summary of the information or
advice.
Any comment containing confidential information must be submitted
by fax to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-3640. A non-confidential summary
of the confidential information must be submitted to https://www.regulations.gov. The non-confidential summary will be placed in the
docket and open to public inspection.
USTR will maintain a docket on this dispute settlement proceeding
accessible to the public. The public file will include non-confidential
comments received by USTR from the public with respect to the dispute;
if a dispute settlement panel is convened or in the event of an appeal
from such a panel, the U.S. submissions, any non-confidential
submissions, or non-confidential summaries of submissions, received
from other participants in the dispute; the report of the panel; and,
if applicable, the report of the Appellate Body.
Comments will be placed in the docket and open to public inspection
pursuant to 15 CFR 2006.13, except confidential business information
exempt from public inspection in accordance with 15 CFR 2006.15 or
information determined by USTR to be confidential in accordance with 19
U.S.C. 2155(g)(2). Comments open to public inspection may be viewed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web site.
Steven F. Fabry,
Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for Monitoring and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2010-3551 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W0-P