Nebraska Public Power District; Cooper Nuclear Station Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, 8153-8154 [2010-3497]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
Management System (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site: https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or send an
e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
date required by 10 CFR Part 73. The
proposed action, an extension of the
schedule for completion of certain
actions required by the revised 10 CFR
Part 73, does not involve any physical
changes to the reactor, fuel, plant
structures, support structures, water, or
land at the NPPD site.
The proposed action is in accordance
with the licensee’s application dated
December 22, 2009.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day
of February 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
James R. Hall,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch IV, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
The Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action is needed to
provide the licensee with additional
time to perform the required upgrades to
the NPPD security system due to
resource and logistical impacts of the
fall 2009 refueling outage and other
factors, including inclement weather.
[FR Doc. 2010–3499 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–298; NRC–2010–0061]
Nebraska Public Power District;
Cooper Nuclear Station Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an exemption, pursuant to
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Section 73.5,
‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ from the
implementation date for certain new
requirements of 10 CFR Part 73,
‘‘Physical protection of plants and
materials,’’ for Facility Operating
License No. DPR–46, issued to Nebraska
Public Power District (NPPD, the
licensee), for operation of the Cooper
Nuclear Station (CNS), located in
Nemaha County, Nebraska. Therefore, as
required by 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC
performed an environmental
assessment. Based on the results of the
environmental assessment, the NRC is
issuing a finding of no significant
impact.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt
NPPD from the required implementation
date of March 31, 2010, for several new
requirements of 10 CFR Part 73.
Specifically, NPPD would be granted an
exemption from being in full
compliance with certain new
requirements contained in 10 CFR 73.55
by the March 31, 2010, deadline. NPPD
has proposed an alternate full
compliance implementation date of
August 31, 2010, 5 months beyond the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC has completed its
environmental assessment of the
proposed exemption. The staff has
concluded that the proposed action to
extend the implementation deadline
would not significantly affect plant
safety and would not have a significant
adverse effect on the probability of an
accident occurring.
The proposed action would not result
in an increased radiological hazard
beyond those previously analyzed in the
environmental assessment and finding
of no significant impact made by the
Commission in promulgating its
revisions to 10 CFR Part 73 as discussed
in a Federal Register notice dated
March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13926). There
will be no change to radioactive
effluents that affect radiation exposures
to plant workers and members of the
public. Therefore, no changes or
different types of radiological impacts
are expected as a result of the proposed
exemption.
The proposed action does not result
in changes to land use or water use, or
result in changes to the quality or
quantity of non-radiological effluents.
No changes to the National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System permit
are needed. No effects on the aquatic or
terrestrial habitat in the vicinity of the
plant, or to threatened, endangered, or
protected species under the Endangered
Species Act, or impacts to essential fish
habitat covered by the MagnusonSteven’s Act are expected. There are no
impacts to the air or ambient air quality.
There are no impacts to historical and
cultural resources. There would be no
impact to socioeconomic resources.
Therefore, no changes to or different
types of non-radiological environmental
impacts are expected as a result of the
proposed exemption.
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8153
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that
there are no significant environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action. In addition, in promulgating its
revisions to 10 CFR Part 73, the
Commission prepared an environmental
assessment and published a finding of
no significant impact [Part 73, Power
Reactor Security Requirements, 74 FR
13926 (March 27, 2009)].
The NRC staff’s safety evaluation will
be provided in the exemption that will
be issued as part of the letter to the
licensee approving the exemption to the
regulation, if granted.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
actions, the NRC staff considered denial
of the proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘noaction’’ alternative). Denial of the
exemption request would result in no
change in current environmental
impacts. If the proposed action was
denied, the licensee would have to
comply with the March 31, 2010,
implementation deadline. The
environmental impacts of the proposed
exemption and the ‘‘no-action’’
alternative are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
The action does not involve the use of
any different resources than those
considered in the Final Environmental
Statement for the Cooper Nuclear
Station dated February 1973.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy,
on January 5, 2010, the NRC staff
consulted with the Nebraska State
official, Ms. J. Schmitt of the Office of
Radiological Health, regarding the
environmental impact of the proposed
action. The State official had no
comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental
assessment, the NRC concludes that the
proposed action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly, the
NRC has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
For further details with respect to the
proposed action, see the licensee’s letter
dated December 22, 2009. Portions of
the document contain security-related
information and, accordingly, are not
available to the public. Other parts of
the document may be examined, and/or
copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, Public File Area O–
1F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
8154
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices
Rockville, Maryland 20852. Publicly
available records will be accessible
electronically from the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Public Electronic
Reading Room on the Internet at the
NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who
do not have access to ADAMS or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS should
contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by
telephone at 1–800–397–4209 or 301–
415–4737, or send an e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day
of February 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Carl F. Lyon,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV,
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–3497 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
In accordance with the purposes of
Sections 29 and 182b of the Atomic
Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2039, 2232b), the
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards (ACRS) will hold a meeting
on March 4–6, 2010, 11545 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The date of
this meeting was previously published
in the Federal Register on Monday,
October 14, 2009, (74 FR 52829–52830).
Thursday, March 4, 2010, Conference
Room T2–B1, Two White Flint North,
Rockville, Maryland
8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening Remarks
by the ACRS Chairman (Open)—
The ACRS Chairman will make
opening remarks regarding the
conduct of the meeting.
8:35 a.m.–10 a.m.: Draft Final Interim
Staff Guidance (ISG) on Fuel Cycle
(ISG–7) (Open)—The Committee
will hear presentations by and hold
discussions with representatives of
the NRC staff and the Nuclear
Energy Institute (NEI) regarding
draft final ISG on Fuel Cycle, NRC
staff’s resolution of public
comments, and related matters.
10:15 a.m.–12 p.m.: Draft Final
Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.141,
‘‘Containment Isolation Provisions
for Fluid Systems’’ (Open)—The
Committee will hear presentations
by and hold discussions with
representatives of the NRC staff
regarding draft final RG 1.141,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
‘‘Containment Isolation Provisions
for Fluid Systems,’’ NRC staff’s
resolution of public comments, and
related matters.
1 p.m.–2 p.m.: Draft Final Revision 1 to
Regulatory Guide 4.11, ‘‘Terrestrial
Environmental Studies for Nuclear
Power Stations’’ (Open)—The
Committee will hear presentations
by and hold discussions with
representatives of the NRC staff
regarding draft Revision 1 to RG
4.11, ‘‘Terrestrial Environmental
Studies for Nuclear Power
Stations,’’ NRC staff’s resolution of
public comments, and related
matters.
2 p.m.–3:15 p.m.: ‘‘Status of Rulemaking
for Disposal of Depleted Uranium
and Other Unique Waste Streams’’
(Open)—The Committee will hear
presentations by and hold
discussions with representatives of
the NRC staff regarding the status of
rulemaking efforts addressing
disposal of depleted uranium and
other unique waste streams, and
related matters.
3:30 p.m.–5 p.m.: Draft ACRS Report on
the NRC Safety Research Program
(Open)—The Committee will
discuss the draft ACRS Report on
Safety Research Program.
5 p.m.–7 p.m.: Preparation of ACRS
Reports (Open)—The Committee
will discuss proposed ACRS reports
on matters discussed during this
and the previous meeting (February
2010).
(Open)—The Committee will meet
with the NRC Executive Director for
Operations (EDO) and Deputy EDOs
to discuss topics of mutual interest.
3 p.m.–4:30 p.m.: Future ACRS
Activities/Report of the Planning
and Procedures Subcommittee
(Open/Closed)—The Committee
will discuss the recommendations
of the Planning and Procedures
Subcommittee regarding items
proposed for consideration by the
Full Committee during future ACRS
meetings, including anticipated
workload and member assignments,
and related matters. [Note: A
portion of this session may be
closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b
(c)(2) and (6) to discuss
organizational and personnel
matters that relate solely to internal
personnel rules and practices of
ACRS, and information the release
of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy]
4:40 p.m.–4:45 p.m.: Reconciliation of
ACRS Comments and
Recommendations (Open)—The
Committee will discuss the
responses from the NRC Executive
Director for Operations to
comments and recommendations
included in recent ACRS reports
and letters.
5 p.m.–7 p.m.: Preparation of ACRS
Reports (Open)—The Committee
will discuss proposed ACRS
reports.
Friday, March 5, 2010, Conference
Room T2–B1, Two White Flint North,
Rockville, Maryland
8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening Remarks
by the ACRS Chairman (Open)—
The ACRS Chairman will make
opening remarks regarding the
conduct of the meeting.
8:35 a.m.–10:15 a.m.: Digital
Instrumentation and Control (I&C)
Design Acceptance Criteria (DAC)
Inspection Methodology (Open)—
The Committee will hear
presentations by and hold
discussions with representatives of
the NRC staff regarding Digital I&C
DAC Inspection Methodology.
10:30 a.m.–12 p.m.: New Advanced
Reactor Designs (Open)—The
Committee will hear presentations
by and hold discussions with
representatives of the NRC staff
regarding new advanced reactor
designs such as NuScale, Iris,
Babcock and Wilcox Modular,
Hyperion, Toshiba’s 4S, and
General Electric’s Prism.
1:30 p.m.–3 p.m.: Meeting with the NRC
Executive Director for Operations
Saturday, March 6, 2010, Conference
Room T2–B1, Two White Flint North,
Rockville, Maryland
8:30 a.m.–12:30 p.m.: Preparation of
ACRS Reports (Open)—The
Committee will continue its
discussion of proposed ACRS
reports.
12:30 p.m.–1 p.m.: Miscellaneous
(Open)—The Committee will
continue its discussion related to
the conduct of Committee activities
and specific issues that were not
completed during previous
meetings.
Procedures for the conduct of and
participation in ACRS meetings were
published in the Federal Register on
October 14, 2009, (74 FR 52829–52830).
In accordance with those procedures,
oral or written views may be presented
by members of the public, including
representatives of the nuclear industry.
Persons desiring to make oral statements
should notify Mr. Derek Widmayer,
Cognizant ACRS Staff, (Telephone: 301–
415–7366, E-mail:
Derek.Widmayer@nrc.gov), five days
before the meeting, if possible, so that
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8153-8154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3497]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-298; NRC-2010-0061]
Nebraska Public Power District; Cooper Nuclear Station
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an exemption, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Section 73.5, ``Specific exemptions,'' from the
implementation date for certain new requirements of 10 CFR Part 73,
``Physical protection of plants and materials,'' for Facility Operating
License No. DPR-46, issued to Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD, the
licensee), for operation of the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS), located
in Nemaha County, Nebraska. Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21, the
NRC performed an environmental assessment. Based on the results of the
environmental assessment, the NRC is issuing a finding of no
significant impact.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt NPPD from the required
implementation date of March 31, 2010, for several new requirements of
10 CFR Part 73. Specifically, NPPD would be granted an exemption from
being in full compliance with certain new requirements contained in 10
CFR 73.55 by the March 31, 2010, deadline. NPPD has proposed an
alternate full compliance implementation date of August 31, 2010, 5
months beyond the date required by 10 CFR Part 73. The proposed action,
an extension of the schedule for completion of certain actions required
by the revised 10 CFR Part 73, does not involve any physical changes to
the reactor, fuel, plant structures, support structures, water, or land
at the NPPD site.
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's
application dated December 22, 2009.
The Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action is needed to provide the licensee with
additional time to perform the required upgrades to the NPPD security
system due to resource and logistical impacts of the fall 2009
refueling outage and other factors, including inclement weather.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC has completed its environmental assessment of the proposed
exemption. The staff has concluded that the proposed action to extend
the implementation deadline would not significantly affect plant safety
and would not have a significant adverse effect on the probability of
an accident occurring.
The proposed action would not result in an increased radiological
hazard beyond those previously analyzed in the environmental assessment
and finding of no significant impact made by the Commission in
promulgating its revisions to 10 CFR Part 73 as discussed in a Federal
Register notice dated March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13926). There will be no
change to radioactive effluents that affect radiation exposures to
plant workers and members of the public. Therefore, no changes or
different types of radiological impacts are expected as a result of the
proposed exemption.
The proposed action does not result in changes to land use or water
use, or result in changes to the quality or quantity of non-
radiological effluents. No changes to the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System permit are needed. No effects on the aquatic or
terrestrial habitat in the vicinity of the plant, or to threatened,
endangered, or protected species under the Endangered Species Act, or
impacts to essential fish habitat covered by the Magnuson-Steven's Act
are expected. There are no impacts to the air or ambient air quality.
There are no impacts to historical and cultural resources. There
would be no impact to socioeconomic resources. Therefore, no changes to
or different types of non-radiological environmental impacts are
expected as a result of the proposed exemption.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. In addition,
in promulgating its revisions to 10 CFR Part 73, the Commission
prepared an environmental assessment and published a finding of no
significant impact [Part 73, Power Reactor Security Requirements, 74 FR
13926 (March 27, 2009)].
The NRC staff's safety evaluation will be provided in the exemption
that will be issued as part of the letter to the licensee approving the
exemption to the regulation, if granted.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed actions, the NRC staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
Denial of the exemption request would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. If the proposed action was denied, the licensee
would have to comply with the March 31, 2010, implementation deadline.
The environmental impacts of the proposed exemption and the ``no-
action'' alternative are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
The action does not involve the use of any different resources than
those considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the Cooper
Nuclear Station dated February 1973.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy, on January 5, 2010, the NRC
staff consulted with the Nebraska State official, Ms. J. Schmitt of the
Office of Radiological Health, regarding the environmental impact of
the proposed action. The State official had no comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes
that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined
not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed
action.
For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the
licensee's letter dated December 22, 2009. Portions of the document
contain security-related information and, accordingly, are not
available to the public. Other parts of the document may be examined,
and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR),
located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O-1F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor),
[[Page 8154]]
Rockville, Maryland 20852. Publicly available records will be
accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the
Internet at the NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or send
an e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of February 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Carl F. Lyon,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010-3497 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P