Arizona Public Service Company, et al. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, 8149-8150 [2010-3496]

Download as PDF mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices that the NRC’s E–Filing system does not support unlisted software, and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer assistance in using unlisted software. If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC in accordance with the E–Filing rule, the participant must file the document using the NRC’s online, Web-based submission form. In order to serve documents through EIE, users will be required to install a Web browser plugin from the NRC Web site. Further information on the Web-based submission form, including the installation of the Web browser plug-in, is available on the NRC’s public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance available on the NRC public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the documents are submitted through the NRC’s E–Filing system. To be timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E–Filing system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of a transmission, the E–Filing system time-stamps the document and sends the submitter an e-mail notice confirming receipt of the document. The E–Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access to the document to the NRC Office of the General Counsel and any others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/ petition to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document via the E–Filing system. A person filing electronically using the agency’s adjudicatory E–Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System Help Desk through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located on the NRC Web site at http:// www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by e-mail at MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at (866) 672–7640. The NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:25 Feb 22, 2010 Jkt 220001 Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays. Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having granted an exemption request from using E–Filing, may require a participant or party to use E– Filing if the presiding officer subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from use of E–Filing no longer exists. Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in NRC’s electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at http:// ehd.nrc.gov/EHD_Proceeding/home.asp, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law requires submission of such information. With respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted materials in their submission. Petitions for leave to intervene must be filed no later than 60 days from February 23, 2010. Non-timely filings will not be entertained absent a determination by the presiding officer that the petition or request should be granted or the contentions should be admitted, based on a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)–(viii). PO 00000 Frm 00119 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 8149 Dated at Lisle, IL, this 9th day of February 2010. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Christine A. Lipa, Chief, Materials Control, ISFSI, and Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III. [FR Doc. 2010–3351 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. STN 50–528, STN 50–529, and STN 50–530; NRC–2010–0058] Arizona Public Service Company, et al. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Appendix G, ‘‘Fracture Toughness Requirements,’’ for Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–41, NPF– 51, and NPF–74, issued to the Arizona Public Service Company (APS, or the licensee), for operation of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS, the facility), Units 1, 2, and 3, respectively, located in Maricopa County, Arizona. Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC is issuing this environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact. Environmental Assessment Identification of the Proposed Action By letter dated February 19, 2009, as supplemented by letter dated December 22, 2009, the licensee submitted a license amendment request where, among other changes, the licensee requested the use of an alternate methodology for calculating the stress intensity factor KIM due to internal pressure loading. As specified in the NRC safety evaluation approving Combustion Engineering (CE) Topical Report NPSD–683–A, Revision 6, ‘‘Development of a RCS [Reactor Coolant System] Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR) for the removal of P–T [Pressure Temperature] Limits and LTOP [Low-Temperature Overpressure Protection] Requirements from the Technical Specifications,’’ dated March 16, 2001, the licensee’s application included a request for an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G for pressure temperature (P–T) limits, since the alternate methodology applies the CE Nuclear Steam Supply System method E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM 23FEN1 8150 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Notices for calculating KIM stress intensity values. The proposed action would exempt the licensee from certain requirements of Appendix G to 10 CFR Part 50 to allow the application of the methodology in CE NPSD–683–A, Revision 6, for the calculation of flaw stress intensity factors due to internal pressure loadings (KIM). mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES The Need for the Proposed Action The exemption is needed to allow the licensee to use an alternate methodology to meet the fracture toughness requirements for the reactor coolant pressure boundary. In the considering the exemption request, the staff has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), the application of the regulation in the particular circumstances is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule, based on the alternate methodology proposed by the licensee. The proposed action would revise the currently-approved methodology for P– T limit calculations to incorporate the methodology approved for use in CE NPSD–683–A, Revision 6. The topical report allows the use of an alternate methodology to calculate the flaw stress intensity factors due to internal pressure loadings (KIM). Specifically, the exemption is needed because the methodology in CE NPSD–683–A, Revision 6, could not be shown to be conservative with respect to the methodology for the determination of KIM provided in Editions and Addenda of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code), Section XI, Appendix G, through the 1995 Edition and 1996 Addenda (the latest Edition and Addenda of the ASME Code which had been incorporated into 10 CFR 50.55a at the time of the staff’s review of CE NPSD–683–A, Revision 6). Therefore, the licensee submitted an exemption request, consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.60, to apply the KIM calculational methodology of CE NPSD–683–A, Revision 6, as part of the PVNGS, Units 1, 2, and 3, PTLR methodology. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and concludes that the use of the alternate methodology described above would provide an adequate margin of safety against brittle failure of the reactor pressure vessels at PVNGS, Units 1, 2 and 3. The proposed change does not involve any replacement or modification of plant components and VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:25 Feb 22, 2010 Jkt 220001 no changes are proposed in the operation of PVNGS. Therefore the staff concludes that the use of an alternate methodology as described in the licensee’s request would not significantly affect plant safety and would not have a significant adverse affect on the probability of an accident occurring. The proposed action will not result in any non-radiological impacts or radiological impacts. The proposed action does not result in changes to the operation of the plant and supporting facilities, land use, or water use, nor does it result in changes to the quality or quantity of non-radiological and radiological effluents. No impacts are expected to the air or ambient air quality. No impacts are expected to aquatic or terrestrial habitats or species, or to threatened, endangered, or protected species. No impacts are expected to historic and cultural resources, or to socioeconomic resources. Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. The details of the staff’s safety evaluation will be provided in the exemption to 10 CFR 50, Appendix G, which will allow the use of the methodology in Topical Report CE NPSD–683–A, Revision 6, to calculate the flaw stress intensity factors due to internal pressure loadings (KIM). The exemption will be issued in a future letter to the licensee. Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’ alternative). Denial of the application would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action are similar. The action does not involve the use of any different resources than those previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, NUREG–0841, dated February 1982. Agencies and Persons Consulted In accordance with its stated policy, on February 12, 2010, the staff consulted with the Arizona State official, Mr. Aubrey Godwin of the Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency, regarding the environmental impact of Frm 00120 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Finding of No Significant Impact On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed action. For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the licensee’s letters dated February 19 and December 22, 2009 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML090641014 and ML10040069, respectively). Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/ reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209 or 301– 415–4737, or send an e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of February 2010. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. James R. Hall, Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2010–3496 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50–498 and 50–499; NRC– 2010–060] Alternative Use of Resources PO 00000 the proposed action. The State official had no comments. STP Nuclear Operating Company South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an exemption, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ from the implementation date for certain new requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, ‘‘Physical protection of plants and materials,’’ for Facility Operating E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM 23FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8149-8150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. STN 50-528, STN 50-529, and STN 50-530; NRC-2010-0058]


Arizona Public Service Company, et al. Palo Verde Nuclear 
Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Environmental Assessment and 
Finding of No Significant Impact

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering 
issuance of an exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Appendix G, ``Fracture Toughness 
Requirements,'' for Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-41, NPF-51, and 
NPF-74, issued to the Arizona Public Service Company (APS, or the 
licensee), for operation of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 
(PVNGS, the facility), Units 1, 2, and 3, respectively, located in 
Maricopa County, Arizona. Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21, the 
NRC is issuing this environmental assessment and finding of no 
significant impact.

Environmental Assessment

Identification of the Proposed Action

    By letter dated February 19, 2009, as supplemented by letter dated 
December 22, 2009, the licensee submitted a license amendment request 
where, among other changes, the licensee requested the use of an 
alternate methodology for calculating the stress intensity factor 
KIM due to internal pressure loading. As specified in the 
NRC safety evaluation approving Combustion Engineering (CE) Topical 
Report NPSD-683-A, Revision 6, ``Development of a RCS [Reactor Coolant 
System] Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR) for the removal 
of P-T [Pressure Temperature] Limits and LTOP [Low-Temperature 
Overpressure Protection] Requirements from the Technical 
Specifications,'' dated March 16, 2001, the licensee's application 
included a request for an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 
Part 50, Appendix G for pressure temperature (P-T) limits, since the 
alternate methodology applies the CE Nuclear Steam Supply System method

[[Page 8150]]

for calculating KIM stress intensity values.
    The proposed action would exempt the licensee from certain 
requirements of Appendix G to 10 CFR Part 50 to allow the application 
of the methodology in CE NPSD-683-A, Revision 6, for the calculation of 
flaw stress intensity factors due to internal pressure loadings 
(KIM).

The Need for the Proposed Action

    The exemption is needed to allow the licensee to use an alternate 
methodology to meet the fracture toughness requirements for the reactor 
coolant pressure boundary. In the considering the exemption request, 
the staff has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), the 
application of the regulation in the particular circumstances is not 
necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule, based on the 
alternate methodology proposed by the licensee. The proposed action 
would revise the currently-approved methodology for P-T limit 
calculations to incorporate the methodology approved for use in CE 
NPSD-683-A, Revision 6. The topical report allows the use of an 
alternate methodology to calculate the flaw stress intensity factors 
due to internal pressure loadings (KIM). Specifically, the 
exemption is needed because the methodology in CE NPSD-683-A, Revision 
6, could not be shown to be conservative with respect to the 
methodology for the determination of KIM provided in 
Editions and Addenda of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers 
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code), Section XI, Appendix G, 
through the 1995 Edition and 1996 Addenda (the latest Edition and 
Addenda of the ASME Code which had been incorporated into 10 CFR 50.55a 
at the time of the staff's review of CE NPSD-683-A, Revision 6). 
Therefore, the licensee submitted an exemption request, consistent with 
the requirements of 10 CFR 50.60, to apply the KIM 
calculational methodology of CE NPSD-683-A, Revision 6, as part of the 
PVNGS, Units 1, 2, and 3, PTLR methodology.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and 
concludes that the use of the alternate methodology described above 
would provide an adequate margin of safety against brittle failure of 
the reactor pressure vessels at PVNGS, Units 1, 2 and 3. The proposed 
change does not involve any replacement or modification of plant 
components and no changes are proposed in the operation of PVNGS. 
Therefore the staff concludes that the use of an alternate methodology 
as described in the licensee's request would not significantly affect 
plant safety and would not have a significant adverse affect on the 
probability of an accident occurring.
    The proposed action will not result in any non-radiological impacts 
or radiological impacts. The proposed action does not result in changes 
to the operation of the plant and supporting facilities, land use, or 
water use, nor does it result in changes to the quality or quantity of 
non-radiological and radiological effluents. No impacts are expected to 
the air or ambient air quality. No impacts are expected to aquatic or 
terrestrial habitats or species, or to threatened, endangered, or 
protected species. No impacts are expected to historic and cultural 
resources, or to socioeconomic resources. Accordingly, the NRC 
concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts 
associated with the proposed action.
    The details of the staff's safety evaluation will be provided in 
the exemption to 10 CFR 50, Appendix G, which will allow the use of the 
methodology in Topical Report CE NPSD-683-A, Revision 6, to calculate 
the flaw stress intensity factors due to internal pressure loadings 
(KIM). The exemption will be issued in a future letter to 
the licensee.

Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered 
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). 
Denial of the application would result in no change in current 
environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action 
and the alternative action are similar.

Alternative Use of Resources

    The action does not involve the use of any different resources than 
those previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for 
the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, NUREG-
0841, dated February 1982.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    In accordance with its stated policy, on February 12, 2010, the 
staff consulted with the Arizona State official, Mr. Aubrey Godwin of 
the Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency, regarding the environmental 
impact of the proposed action. The State official had no comments.

Finding of No Significant Impact

    On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes 
that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined 
not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed 
action.
    For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
licensee's letters dated February 19 and December 22, 2009 (Agencywide 
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. 
ML090641014 and ML10040069, respectively). Documents may be examined, 
and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), 
located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available 
records will be accessible electronically from the ADAMS Public 
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to 
ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in 
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-
397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or send an e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of February 2010.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
James R. Hall,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, Division of 
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010-3496 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P