Serve America Act Amendments to the National and Community Service Act of 1990, 8013-8030 [2010-3385]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
proposed does not include a Federal
mandate that may result in estimated
costs of $100 million or more to either
State, local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate, or to the private sector. This
Federal action proposes to approve and
disapprove pre-existing requirements
under State or local law, and imposes
no new requirements. Accordingly, no
additional costs to State, local, or tribal
governments, or to the private sector,
result from this action.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) revokes and replaces Executive
Orders 12612 (Federalism) and 12875
(Enhancing the Intergovernmental
Partnership). Executive Order 13132
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ Under
Executive Order 13132, EPA may not
issue a regulation that has federalism
implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not
required by statute, unless the Federal
government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by State and local
governments, or EPA consults with
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation. EPA also may not issue a
regulation that has federalism
implications and that preempts State
law unless the Agency consults with
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation.
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, because it
merely proposes to approve or
disapprove a State rule implementing a
federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of
section 6 of the Executive Order do not
apply to this rule.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
8013
F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments
perform activities conducive to the use
of VCS.
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ This proposed rule does
not have tribal implications, as specified
in Executive Order 13175. It will not
have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
EPA specifically solicits additional
comment on this proposed rule from
tribal officials.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as
applying only to those regulatory
actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under section 5–501 of the Executive
Order has the potential to influence the
regulation. This rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045, because it
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard.
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12 of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal
agencies to evaluate existing technical
standards when developing a new
regulation. To comply with NTTAA,
EPA must consider and use ‘‘voluntary
consensus standards’’ (VCS) if available
and applicable when developing
programs and policies unless doing so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical.
The EPA believes that VCS are
inapplicable to this action. Today’s
action does not require the public to
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 10, 2010.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2010–3513 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
45 CFR Parts 2510, 2522, 2525, 2526,
2527, 2528, 2529, 2530, 2531, 2532,
2533, 2550, 2551, and 2552
RIN 3045–AA51
Serve America Act Amendments to the
National and Community Service Act
of 1990
AGENCY: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: On April 21, 2009, President
Obama signed into law the Edward M.
Kennedy Serve America Act (‘‘The Serve
America Act’’ or ‘‘SAA’’). The Serve
America Act reauthorizes and expands
national service programs administered
by the Corporation for National and
Community Service (‘‘the Corporation’’)
by amending the National and
Community Service Act of 1990
(‘‘NCSA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’) and the Domestic
Volunteer Service Act of 1973 (‘‘DVSA’’).
The Corporation publishes this
proposed rule to implement changes to
the operation of the National Service
Trust under the Serve America Act. This
proposed rule provides flexibility for
exceptions to the 80 percent cost
reimbursement requirement for Senior
Companion and Foster Grandparent
programs based on hardship. In
addition, this proposed rule reorders
and renumbers certain parts of the
existing regulations, adds new
definitions, and makes several minor
technical edits.
DATES: To be sure your comments are
considered, they must reach the
Corporation or or before April 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send your
comments electronically through the
Federal government’s one-stop
rulemaking Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov. You may also mail
or deliver your comments to Amy
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
8014
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Borgstrom, Docket Manager,
Corporation for National and
Community Service, 1201 New York
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20525.
Members of the public may review
copies of all communications received
on this rulemaking at https://
www.regulations.gov or at the
Corporation’s Washington, DC
headquarters.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Borgstrom, Docket Manager,
Corporation for National and
Community Service,
aborgstrom@cns.gov, TDD 606–3472.
Persons with visual impairments may
request this rule in an alternate format.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments
about these proposed regulations. To
ensure that your comments have
maximum value in helping us develop
the final regulations, we urge you to
identify clearly the specific section or
sections of the proposed regulations that
each comment addresses and to arrange
your comments in the same order as the
proposed regulations. During and after
the comment period, you may inspect
all public comments about these
proposed regulations on https://
www.regulations.gov or by contacting
the Docket Manager listed in this notice.
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an
appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for these proposed regulations. If
you want to schedule an appointment
for this type of aid, please contact Amy
Borgstrom, Docket Manager,
Corporation for National and
Community Service,
aborgstrom@cns.gov, TDD 606–3472.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Background
On April 21, 2009, President Obama
signed into law the Edward M. Kennedy
Serve America Act (Serve America Act).
The Serve America Act reauthorizes and
expands national service programs
administered by the Corporation by
amending the NCSA and DVSA. The
Corporation engages four million
Americans in service each year,
including approximately 75,000
AmeriCorps members, 492,000 Senior
Corps Volunteers, 1.1 million Learn and
Serve America students, and 2.2 million
additional community volunteers
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
mobilized and managed through agency
programs.
Section 6101 of the Serve America
Act authorizes the Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation to issue such
regulations as may be necessary to carry
out the amendments required under the
Act. To fulfill that responsibility, on
September 10, 2009, the Corporation
issued an interim final rule to
implement time-sensitive changes to the
Corporation’s AmeriCorps State and
National, Senior Corps, and Learn and
Serve America program regulations. (74
FR 46495). The changes resulting from
the interim final rule were required as
a result of amendments to the NCSA
and DVSA by the Serve America Act,
which took effect for most purposes on
October 1, 2009.
In that rule, we stated our intention to
engage in full notice and comment
rulemaking to implement those
amendments mandated by the Serve
America Act that did not require
immediate regulatory action. This rule
primarily proposes amendments and
additions to existing regulations
regarding the National Service Trust,
including limitations on education
award receipt, the available uses of
education awards, eligibility to receive
an education award, eligibility to
transfer an education award, and the
amount of an education award. This
proposed rule also addresses the
limitation on the number of terms an
individual may serve in an AmeriCorps
State and National program. The
proposed rule allows flexibility in
managing match requirements for
Senior Companion and Foster
Grandparent programs facing hardship.
Finally, this rule makes several
technical corrections inadvertently
omitted from the interim final rule,
including an amendment to the
provision on pre-approval of Subtitle C
formula programs, amendments to the
AmeriCorps State and National
selection criteria, and an amendment to
include a reference to the Department of
Education’s new Public Service Loan
Forgiveness Program. An overview of
specific changes for each program is set
out below.
III. Proposed Rule
Definitions (§§ 2510.20, 2525.20)
The National Service Trust is an
account in the U.S. Treasury authorized
to disburse education awards to national
service participants. Prior to passage of
the Serve America Act, the Corporation
was authorized to disburse one type of
education award from the National
Service Trust—a national service
education award, also known as a Segal
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
AmeriCorps education award, available
upon successful completion of a term of
service in an approved AmeriCorps
position. An ‘‘approved AmeriCorps
position’’ is one of the positions
described in Sec. 123 of the Act,
including a position in AmeriCorps
State and National, AmeriCorps NCCC,
AmeriCorps VISTA, and the newly
authorized ServeAmerica Fellowship
program.
The Serve America Act authorizes
two new types of education awards: (1)
A Silver Scholar education award of
$1,000, available upon successful
completion of a term of service in an
approved Silver Scholar position; and
(2) a Summer of Service education
award of between $500 and $750,
available upon successful completion of
a term of service in an approved
Summer of Service position. To align
with the amended statute, this proposed
rule amends § 2525.20 by adding three
separate definitions for ‘‘AmeriCorps
education award,’’ ‘‘Silver Scholar
education award,’’ and ‘‘Summer of
Service education award.’’
Each of these awards is based upon
successful completion of a term of
service in an approved position. For a
position of any type to be considered
‘‘approved,’’ the Corporation must have
agreed to provide a corresponding
education award upon successful
completion of a term of service in that
position. This proposed rule amends
§ 2510.20 by adding definitions to
clarify that in order for a Summer of
Service or Silver Scholar position to be
considered approved, it must be
approved by the Corporation for the
receipt of a Silver Scholar or Summer of
Service education award, respectively.
There are different service
requirements for each type of education
award. A term of service in an approved
AmeriCorps position is for at least 1,700
hours during a period of not more than
one year, with options for part-time or
reduced part-time terms of service, as
defined in § 2522.220, for AmeriCorps
State and National members. A term of
service in an approved Silver Scholar
position must be for at least 350 hours
during a period of one year. A term of
service in an approved Summer of
Service position must be for at least 100
hours ‘‘during the summer months.’’ To
clarify that what constitutes a term of
service will vary depending upon the
program, this proposed rule amends the
definition of ‘‘term of service’’ in
§ 2525.20 to align with the NCSA by
providing separate descriptions for
terms of service in approved
AmeriCorps, Silver Scholar, and
Summer of Service positions.
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
As stated above, a Summer of Service
education award will generally be $500.
However, the NCSA authorizes the
Corporation to establish a Summer of
Service award of $750 for ‘‘economically
disadvantaged youth.’’ The Corporation
proposes in this rule to define
‘‘economically disadvantaged youth’’ for
the purposes of the larger Summer of
Service education award as a child who
is eligible for a free lunch and breakfast
under the Richard B. Russell National
School Lunch Act. This proposed rule
amends § 2525.20 to add this definition.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Eligibility To Receive an Education
Award (§ 2526.10)
The Serve America Act created two
new types of education awards: Silver
Scholar education awards and Summer
of Service education awards, for $1000
and $500 respectively, available upon
successful completion of an approved
Silver Scholar or Summer of Service
position. This proposed rule amends
§ 2526.10 to include individuals who
successfully complete terms of service
in approved Silver Scholar or Summer
of positions as eligible to receive an
education award from the National
Service Trust.
Previously, the list of eligibility
criteria to receive an education award in
§ 2526.10 has reflected the eligibility
criteria to serve in AmeriCorps State
and National, AmeriCorps NCCC, and
AmeriCorps VISTA, including age and
education criteria that would
necessarily exclude individuals in
Summer of Service positions, which are
available for ‘‘youth who will be
enrolled in any of grades 6 through 12
at the end of the summer’’ (42 U.S.C.
12563(c)(8)). To align with the amended
statute, this proposed rule amends
§ 2526.10 to defer to the eligibility
criteria of individual programs for
program-specific criteria.
Under the proposed rule, for an
individual to be eligible to receive an
education award, the organization
responsible for the individual’s
supervision must certify: (1) That the
individual met the applicable eligibility
requirements for the approved national
service position, approved Silver
Scholar position, or approved Summer
of Service position, as appropriate; (2)
that the individual successfully
completed the term of service in the
AmeriCorps, Silver Scholar, or Summer
of Service program; and (3) that the
individual is a citizen, national, or
lawful permanent resident alien of the
United States.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Successful Completion of a Term of
Service (§ 2526.15)
Sec. 146 of the NCSA directs the
Corporation to determine a process by
which an organization responsible for
the supervision of a national service
participant may determine whether the
participant successfully completed a
term of service. This proposed rule adds
a new § 2526.15 specifying the process
for determining whether an individual
successfully completed a term of service
for the purposes of receiving an
education award from the National
Service Trust. Under this rule,
organizations supervising AmeriCorps
State and National participants would
continue to use the existing process
detailed at § 2522.220(d). For all other
programs, the organization would be
required to conduct an end-of-term
evaluation for each participant to
determine whether: (1) The individual
completed the required number of
service hours for the respective term of
service; (2) the individual performed
satisfactorily on assignments, tasks, or
projects; and (3) the individual met any
other performance criteria as
communicated to the member by the
organization. What is considered
‘‘satisfactory performance’’ is within the
discretion of the program. While the
Corporation encourages programs to
keep records of end-of-term evaluations
of member performance for their own
purposes, for the purpose of this
requirement certification that an
individual did or did not successfully
complete a term of service will be
deemed to incorporate an end-of-term
evaluation. A certification will not,
however, suffice as documentation of
hours served.
Release for Compelling Personal
Circumstances (§§ 2526.20–25)
Sec. 147 of the NCSA authorizes the
Corporation to make education awards
in five different amount categories: (1)
An amount for successful completion of
a full-time approved national service
position; (2) an amount for successful
completion of a part-time approved
national service position; (3) an amount
for partial completion of service,
available upon release for compelling
personal circumstances from an
approved national service position; (4)
an amount for a Silver Scholar
education award for successful
completion of an approved Silver
Scholar position; and (5) an amount for
a Summer of Service education award
for successful completion of an
approved Summer of Service position.
Partial awards are described only in the
context of release for compelling
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8015
personal circumstances from an
approved national service position. In
describing types of service positions in
Sec. 146, the Act distinguishes between
approved national service positions
(which are described in Sec. 123 to
include AmeriCorps State and National,
AmeriCorps VISTA, AmeriCorps NCCC,
and ServeAmerica Fellows), approved
Silver Scholar positions, and approved
Summer of Service positions, and does
not provide for a pro-rated award for a
release for compelling personal
circumstances from an approved Silver
Scholar or Summer of Service position.
In summary, there is no authority for a
partial award for a release for
compelling personal circumstances from
a Silver Scholar or Summer of Service
position.
This proposed rule amends § 2526.20
and adds a new § 2526.25 to clarify that
partial awards will not be available for
individuals who are released early from
Silver Scholar or Summer of Service
positions, even for compelling reasons.
This proposed rule also amends
§ 2526.20 to reflect the statutory
requirement that an individual must
have performed satisfactorily prior to
being released for compelling personal
circumstances in order to receive a
partial education award.
Limitation on Amount of Award
Disbursed to Institution of Higher
Education (§§ 2528.30–40)
Prior to the effective date of the Serve
America Act, under Sec. 148(c)(6) of the
NCSA, the Corporation’s disbursement
from an individual’s education award
for any period of enrollment at an
institution of higher education could
not exceed the difference between that
individual’s cost of attendance for that
period of enrollment and the sum of (1)
the individual’s estimated financial
assistance for that period under part A
of title IV of the Higher Education Act
and (2) the individual’s veterans’
benefits as defined under section 480(c)
of the Higher Education Act. The Serve
America Act amended Sec. 148(c)(6) to
no longer consider an individual’s
veterans’ benefits in this manner. This
proposed rule amends §§ 2528.30 and
40 to align with amended Sec. 148(c)(6)
by removing any consideration of an
individual’s veterans’ benefits when
determining the maximum amount of
the individual’s education award that
may be disbursed to an institution of
higher education.
Use of Education Award for a Program
of Education Approved by the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs (§§ 2528.10, 60–80)
The Serve America Act amended Sec.
148 of the NCSA to add a fifth available
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
8016
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
use for an education award. Under the
amended law, the education award is
available ‘‘to pay expenses incurred in
enrolling in an educational institution
or training establishment that is
approved under chapter 36 of title 38,
United States Code, or other applicable
provisions of law, for offering programs
of education, apprenticeship, or on-job
training for which educational
assistance may be provided by the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.’’ (42 U.S.C.
12604(a)(4)). This proposed rule amends
§ 2528.10 to add this use to the list of
available uses, and adds rules on the
process for using the award for this
purpose. Benefits offered under chapter
36 of title 38, U.S.C., were authorized
under the Montgomery G.I. Bill and the
Post 9/11 G.I. Bill, and will be referred
to hereinafter as ‘‘G.I. Bill education
benefits.’’ Likewise, courses and
programs approved under that chapter
will be referred to as ‘‘G.I.-approved.’’
This proposed rule would require that
the institution or training establishment
at which an individual requests to use
an education award certify under
penalty of law that the amount
requested would be used to pay all or
part of the individual’s expenses
attributable to a course, program of
education, apprenticeship, or job
training program offered by that
institution or training establishment,
and certify under penalty of law that the
course or program for which the
individual is requesting to use the
education award has been and is
currently approved by the State
approving agency for the State where
the institution or establishment is
located, or by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs. The Department of Veterans
Affairs is the agency responsible for
approving courses or programs of
education under chapter 36 of title 38,
U.S. Code, and the Corporation defers to
the decisions made by the State
approving agencies and the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs regarding approving—
or withdrawing approval—of a program
of education; if an institution or
establishment cannot verify that a
course or program of education has
received the requisite approval, the
Corporation will not disburse the funds
to the school.
Unlike G.I. education benefits, which
may be disbursed directly to an
individual, under this proposed rule,
the education award would be
disbursed directly to the educational
institution or training establishment.
If an individual for whom the
Corporation has disbursed an education
award withdraws or fails to complete
the period of enrollment at an
educational institution or training
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
establishment in a program of education
approved by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs, this proposed rule would
require the educational institution or
training establishment to provide a prorated refund to the Corporation.
Payment of Accrued Interest (2529.10)
This proposed rule amends § 2529.10,
which currently provides for interest
forbearance to individuals serving in
approved AmeriCorps positions, to
clarify that individuals who
successfully complete terms of service
in approved Silver Scholar positions
may also be eligible for payments of
interest accrued on qualified student
loans while serving. The proposed rule
does not include Summer of Service
positions, as Summer of Service
positions are reserved for rising 6th
through 12th graders who, having not
yet enrolled in an institution of higher
education, will not yet have incurred
qualified students loans.
The Serve America Act also amended
Sec. 123 by expanding the list of
positions considered to be approved
national service positions to include ‘‘a
position involving service in the
ServeAmerica Fellowship program.’’
The term ‘‘approved national service
position’’ is used interchangeably with
the term ‘‘approved AmeriCorps
position.’’ Thus, although this proposed
rule does not explicitly amend § 2529.10
to include ServeAmerica Fellows, they
are incorporated by definition.
Amount of AmeriCorps Education
Award (§ 2527.10)
Upon successful completion of a term
of service in an approved AmeriCorps
position, including positions in
AmeriCorps State and National,
AmeriCorps VISTA, AmeriCorps NCCC,
and Serve America Fellows, an
individual is eligible to receive an
AmeriCorps education award from the
National Service Trust. Prior to the
passage of the Serve America Act, the
amount of a full-time AmeriCorps
education award was set in law at
$4,725.
The Serve America Act amended Sec.
147 of the NCSA by changing the
amount of a full-time national service
education award to be ‘‘equal to the
maximum amount of a Federal Pell
Grant under section 401 of the Higher
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1071a)
that a student eligible for such Grant
may receive in the aggregate * * * for
the year for which the national service
position is approved by the
Corporation.’’ This proposed rule
amends § 2527.10 to conform to the
changes in the NCSA in the amount of
the full-time award.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The amount of the Pell Grant upon
which AmeriCorps education awards
will be based may change each year,
thus, the amount of an AmeriCorps
education award may also change
annually. To determine the amount of
an AmeriCorps education award, the
Corporation will use the amount of the
Pell Grant as of October 1 (the first day
of the Federal fiscal year) in the fiscal
year in which the national service
position is approved. For example, if a
national service position is approved in
September of 2010, the amount of the
education award will be based on a fulltime amount of $5,350—the amount of
the Pell Grant as of October 1, 2009 (the
first day of fiscal year 2010).
The trigger date for determining the
amount of an education award for a
particular national service position is
the date that position is approved—not
the date the individual begins serving in
a national service position. Not all
positions that begin in a fiscal year will
receive an education award based on the
amount of the Pell Grant in that fiscal
year.
In accordance with the national
service laws, funding for education
awards are obligated on a different
schedule for AmeriCorps VISTA,
AmeriCorps NCCC, and AmeriCorps
State and National. What follows is a
detailed discussion on how the approval
date for a national service position is
determined for the purposes of
establishing the amount of an education
award.
For AmeriCorps VISTA, a position is
considered to be approved at the time
the Corporation enters into an
enforceable agreement with an
individual, signified by the individual’s
taking the VISTA oath of service. (42
U.S.C. 4954(c)). For an AmeriCorps
VISTA position, the education award
amount is equal to the amount of a Pell
Grant on October 1 of the fiscal year in
which the VISTA takes the oath of
service. For example, a VISTA who
takes the oath on any date between
October 1, 2009, and September 30,
2010, is eligible for a full-time award
amount of $5,350—the amount of the
Pell Grant as of October 1, 2009.
For AmeriCorps NCCC, a position is
considered to be approved at the time
the Corporation enters into an
enforceable agreement with an
individual, signified by the individual’s
signing of an AmeriCorps NCCC
member agreement. For an AmeriCorps
NCCC position, the education award
amount will be equal to the amount of
a Pell Grant on October 1 of the fiscal
year in which the AmeriCorps NCCC
member signs the member agreement.
Therefore, an individual who signs an
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
AmeriCorps NCCC member agreement
on any date between October 1, 2009,
and September 10, 2010, will receive an
award based on a full-time award
amount of $5,350—the amount of the
Pell Grant as of October 1, 2009.
For AmeriCorps State and National,
by law, a position is considered to be
approved at the time the Corporation
executes a grant used to support the
AmeriCorps member—not the date an
AmeriCorps member takes an oath,
signs an agreement, or begins service.
As discussed above, the day an
individual enters service in AmeriCorps
NCCC or AmeriCorps VISTA may make
a significant difference in the amount of
the education award, as the award for a
position will likely be larger if the
individual takes an oath of office or
signs an agreement on October 1, as
opposed to September 30. The same will
not be true for AmeriCorps State and
National members. AmeriCorps State
and National grants are generally made
during the Spring and Summer, i.e., in
the latter half of a fiscal year. As a
result, unlike AmeriCorps NCCC and
AmeriCorps VISTA members who are
eligible for the new amount of the award
as of October 1, the earliest point at
which an AmeriCorps member may
begin serving in a position funded by
those grants may be closer to the end of
a fiscal year.
As an example, if an AmeriCorps
State program receives a grant on
August 1, 2010, and enrolls a member
using fiscal year 2010 grant funds on
August 3, 2010, that member will
receive an education award based on a
full-time amount of $5,350—the amount
of the Pell Grant on October 1, 2009, the
first day of the fiscal year in which the
August 2010 grant was made. If the
program then enrolls another member
on October 10, 2010, that member will
also receive an education award based
on the $5,350 amount—even though at
that point a new fiscal year has begun,
and the Pell Grant for fiscal year 2011
may have increased as of October 1,
2010. The determining factor is that the
member position was approved by the
Corporation in fiscal year 2010.
Further, unlike an AmeriCorps NCCC
or AmeriCorps VISTA member, whose
approval date will closely correlate with
the day the individual begins service, it
is possible for an AmeriCorps State and
National member beginning service in
one fiscal year to be supported with
funds from a grant made in a prior fiscal
year. Therefore, it is possible for two
AmeriCorps members starting service on
the same day to be supported by two
different grant awards made in two
different fiscal years, resulting in two
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
different approval dates and two
different education award amounts.
For example, a program might receive
a continuation grant on August 1, 2011,
but still have grant funds carried over
from a grant made in 2010. If the
program enrolls two members on
August 1, 2011—one supported with the
2010 grant and one supported with the
2011 grant—the one supported with the
2010 grant will be eligible for an award
based on a full-time award of $5,350—
the amount of the Pell Grant on October
1, 2009, the first day of the fiscal year
in which the 2010 grant was made. The
member who is being supported with
2011 funds will be eligible for an award
based on whatever the amount of the
Pell Grant is on October 1, 2010.
The Corporation recognizes the
possibility for confusion among
AmeriCorps State and National
members, who, unlike AmeriCorps
NCCC and AmeriCorps VISTA
members, will not be able to rely on
their service start dates to figure out the
amount of the award they are eligible to
receive. To reduce confusion, it is
essential for AmeriCorps programs—
particularly those with AmeriCorps
State and National members—to clearly
communicate to each member, prior to
the commencement of service, the
amount of the education award the
individual will receive upon successful
completion of the term of service.
Beginning with grants made in 2010,
AmeriCorps State and National grant
provisions will direct grantees to specify
the amount of the education award of
the funds being used to support the
position in the member service
agreement.
It is important to remember that the
Serve America Act went into effect on
October 1, 2009. All positions approved
prior to that date are eligible for awards
based on a full-time amount of $4,725.
This includes all AmeriCorps State and
National positions, even those that
began after October 1, 2009, since no
AmeriCorps State and National
positions have been approved with
fiscal year 2010 funds to date.
To learn more about the amount of the
education award and how it is
determined, visit the AmeriCorps Web
site at https://www.americorps.gov/
for_individuals/benefits/
benefits_ed_award.asp.
Amount of Silver Scholar and Summer
of Service Education Awards (§ 2527.10)
As previously discussed, the Serve
America Act created two new types of
education awards: Silver Scholar
education awards and Summer of
Service education awards. This
proposed rule amends § 2527.10 to
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8017
include the Silver Scholar education
award of $1000, available upon
successful completion of a term of
service of at least 350 hours in a Silver
Scholar position.
This proposed rule also amends
§ 2527.10 to include the Summer of
Service education award of $500,
available upon successful completion of
at least 100 hours in a Summer of
Service position. The Corporation may
authorize a Summer of Service
education award of $750 if the
participant is economically
disadvantaged. In order to authorize the
increased award, the Corporation must
receive a certification from the school
with which the participant served that
the participant meets the definition of
‘‘economically disadvantaged,’’ defined
in this rule as a child that is eligible for
a free lunch and breakfast under the
Richard B. Russell National School
Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(b)).
Pro-rated education awards for an
early release for compelling personal
circumstances from a Silver Scholar or
Summer of Service position are not
available. If an individual fails to
complete either type of term for any
reason, the individual will not receive
any award. And unlike the AmeriCorps
education award described in the
previous section, Silver Scholar and
Summer of Service education awards
will not vary in amount from one year
to the next.
Limitation on Value of Education
Awards Received (§§ 2526.50–55)
Prior to the passage of the Serve
America Act, the national service laws
limited individuals to receiving an
education award ‘‘only on the basis of
the first and second * * * terms of
service.’’ A term of service includes fulltime, part-time, or less-than-part-time
terms, terms in which the person served
at least 15 percent of the term of service,
and terms for which an individual was
released for misconduct regardless of
the amount of time served. Terms range
in service hour requirements from 300
hours to more than 1,700 hours, but
despite the contrast in the level of
commitment required or the service
opportunity presented, all terms were
previously considered of equal value for
the purposes of limiting the receipt of
education awards.
The Serve America Act amended the
national service laws to no longer limit
the receipt of education awards based
upon the number of terms served, but
rather place the limit on the value of
education awards received. Sec. 146(c)
now states: ‘‘An individual may not
receive, through national service
educational awards and silver scholar
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
educational awards, more than an
amount equal to the aggregate value of
[two] such awards for full-time service.’’
The amended law allows for an
individual to earn more than two
education awards, so long as the
aggregate value of all awards received
does not exceed the aggregate value of
two full-time national service education
awards. Significantly, the law does not
create an entitlement to receive the
aggregate value of two full-time awards;
rather, it prohibits an individual from
receiving more than the aggregate value
of two full-time awards. This proposed
rule amends § 2526.50 to align with the
amended statutory language.
As previously discussed, the amount
of a full-time education award is now
tied to the amount of a Pell Grant in the
year the position is awarded, and is
likely to change each year. The
Corporation does not interpret the
amended statute to suggest that the
value of two full-time education awards
for the purposes of this section is equal
to the dollar amount of two full-time
awards and would thus similarly change
on an annual basis, providing a
potentially unlimited number of service
opportunities and education awards.
Nor does the Corporation interpret this
change as a means of ensuring that all
national service participants receive an
identical amount of money. Rather, the
Corporation interprets the change in
focus from the number of terms served
to the value of education awards
received as a means of addressing the
inequity of limiting individuals to two
terms of service when not all terms offer
an equivalent service opportunity. In
other words, for the purposes of the
limitation on education award receipt,
value is distinct from amount.
The Corporation considers an
education award to be the counterpart to
successful completion of a term of
service, and while the amount of that
award might change, the service
opportunity offered by a particular term
of service is constant. The Corporation
interprets the ‘‘value’’ of a full-time
education award to be representative of
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Value of education award received =
For example, an individual who
completed a part-time position
approved in 2009 received an education
award of $2362.50. The value of this
award is the amount received,
$2,362.50, divided by $4,725, the
amount of a full-time award in the year
the position was approved, or .5.
Another individual completes a parttime position approved in 2010 and
receives an education award of $2,675.
The value of this award is the amount
received, $2,675, divided by $5,350, the
amount of a full-time award in the year
the position was approved, or .5. Using
this calculation, the value of an award
received for part-time service will
always be equal to .5.
If an individual leaves a term of
service for compelling personal
circumstances and receives a pro-rated
award, the value attributed to that
award will be based on the amount
actually received. For example, an
individual was released for compelling
personal circumstances from a full-time
position approved in 2009 after serving
800 hours, and received a pro-rated
award of $2,223.52. The value of this
award is the amount of the award
received, $2,223.52, divided by, $4,725,
the amount of a full-time award in the
year the position was approved, or .47.
Another individual was released for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Amount of award Received
Amount of full-time award in fiscal year in which position
n
upon which award is based was approved
compelling personal circumstances from
a full-time position approved in 2010
after serving 800 hours, and received a
pro-rated award of $2,517.64. The value
of this award is the amount of the award
received, $2,517.64, divided by, $5,350,
the amount of a full-time award in the
year the position was approved, or .47.
If an individual exits a term for cause
and does not receive an education
award, the amount received will be $0,
and therefore no value will be attributed
to the individual for purposes of this
section. However, an exit for cause will
have an impact on the individual’s
eligibility to serve subsequent terms of
service. A term exited for cause is
considered a term of service for the
purposes of term limitations for
individual programs. For example, if an
individual has already served one term
of service in AmeriCorps NCCC, and
exits a second term in AmeriCorps
NCCC for cause, the individual has
exhausted the two terms of service one
may serve in AmeriCorps NCCC.
Additionally, if an individual is
released for cause from an approved
AmeriCorps position (including
positions in AmeriCorps State and
National, AmeriCorps VISTA,
AmeriCorps NCCC, and Serve America
Fellows), and the program determines in
the end-of-term evaluation that the
PO 00000
the service opportunity upon which it is
based, therefore, a limitation of two fulltime education awards can be
understood as a limitation of two fulltime service opportunities.
In order to attribute a value to an
award received on the basis of a static
service opportunity in an environment
in which the award amount may
fluctuate annually, the Corporation
proposes to measure the value of any
award amount relative to the amount of
a full-time award in a given year. In this
rule, the Corporation proposes, for the
purposes of this section, that the value
of an education award is equal to the
actual amount of the education award
received divided by the amount of a
full-time education award in the year
the AmeriCorps or Silver Scholar
position upon which the award is based
was approved. Using this calculation,
every award received will be considered
to have a value between 0 and 1.
Although the amount of a full-time
award may change, the value of a fulltime award will always be equal to 1.
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
individual served unsatisfactorily, the
individual may not be permitted to
serve a subsequent term in an approved
AmeriCorps position.
For the purpose of transferred awards
(discussed further in the section in this
preamble on transfer), this rule proposes
that the value of the award received by
a transferee will be the actual amount of
the award received divided by the
amount of a full-time award in the year
the position for which the transferring
individual received the award was
approved. For example, if an individual
receives an education award based on a
term of service approved in 2010, and
later transfers $1,000 of that award to a
grandchild, the grandchild will be
considered to have received an award
value of .19, the result of dividing the
amount received, $1,000, by the amount
of a full-time award in 2010, $5,350. If
the transferring individual revokes all or
part of an award, this rule proposes that
the value considered to be received by
the designated individual will be
decreased accordingly. An individual
who receives the aggregate value of two
full-time awards through transferred
awards will not be eligible to enroll in
a term of service the successful
completion of which would result in the
receipt of an education award.
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
EP23FE10.000
8018
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Under the proposed rule, an award is
considered to be received at the time it
becomes available for an individual’s
use, and the fact that an individual does
not use an award does not diminish its
value for the purposes of this section. In
addition, under the proposed rule an
individual who transfers an award will
still be considered to have received the
award, and the value of the award for
the purposes of this section will not be
decreased by the amount the individual
transfers to a designated individual. For
example, if an individual successfully
completes two full-time terms of
service, and the individual then
transfers both full-time awards to a
child, both the child and the
transferring individual will be
considered to have received two fulltime awards.
The proposed rule states that an
individual may receive no more than
the aggregate value of two full-time
education awards. In this rule, the
Corporation proposes that the aggregate
value of awards received will be equal
to the sum of the value of each national
service education award received
(awards received from terms of service
in AmeriCorps State and National,
AmeriCorps VISTA, AmeriCorps NCCC,
or ServeAmerica fellowships), including
partial awards, the value of each Silver
Scholar award received, and the value
of each transferred award received. The
calculation of the aggregate value does
not include Summer of Service
education awards, as these are explicitly
excluded by law.
For example, an individual served a
full-time term in 2008 and received an
award of $4,725. The same individual
served a part-time term in 2009 and
received an award of $2,362.50. The
individual enrolls in a minimum-time
term in 2010 and receives an award of
$1,132.60. The value of the first award
is 1 ($4,725 divided by $4,725), the
value of the second award is .5
($2,362.50 divided by $4,725), and the
value of the third award is .21
($1,132.60 divided by $5,350). The
aggregate value of awards received is
1.71 (1 + .5 + .21).
While the amended law separates the
previously indivisible limitations on
number of terms served and education
awards received, the limitation on
education awards an individual is
eligible to receive may impact an
individual’s eligibility to enroll in a
subsequent term of service. The
proposed rule states that an individual
may not enroll in a subsequent term of
service if successful completion of that
term of service would result in receipt
of an education award the value of
which, when added to the aggregate
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
value of awards previously received,
would be greater than 2. This limitation
would not, however, prevent an
individual from enrolling in a term of
service for which the individual chooses
to waive receipt of an education award,
including a VISTA term of service for
which the individual elects to receive
an end-of-service stipend.
Using the example above, if an
individual had received an aggregate
value of 1.71 awards in the past, that
individual may be eligible to enroll in
a quarter-time, minimum-time, reduced
part-time, or Silver Scholar position, but
would not be eligible to enroll in a parttime or full-time position, since the
value of a part-time award, .5, plus 1.71,
is greater than 2.
The Corporation has received
questions regarding whether an
individual could enroll in a term of
service, and exit for compelling
personal circumstances in order to
receive a pro-rated award that, when
added to other awards received, would
not exceed the aggregate value of two
full-time education awards. Exiting in
order to receive an education award of
a particular amount would not be
considered to be a compelling personal
circumstance. The proposed rule is
based upon the assumption that every
individual who enrolls in a term of
service does so with the intention of
successfully completing that term.
Therefore, an individual would not be
permitted to enroll in a term with the
intention of leaving early in order to
receive a pro-rated award of a lesser
value.
The Corporation has received
questions about whether awards
received prior to the effective date of the
Serve America Act will be included in
determining the value of education
awards received. The national service
laws, as amended by the Serve America
Act, do not differentiate between awards
received prior to the effective date. All
awards earned in the past will have a
value attributed to them for the
purposes of this section. Thus, under
the proposed rule, if an individual has
received two full-time education awards
in the past, that individual is not
eligible to receive another education
award, and may not enroll in a term of
service that will result in the receipt of
an education award.
Separate from the limitation on
education award receipt, individual
Corporation programs—AmeriCorps
NCCC, AmeriCorps VISTA, and
AmeriCorps State & National—have
their own term limitations. Each fulltime term, part-time term, and term for
which the individual leaves after
serving 15% or for misconduct is
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8019
considered one term for the purposes of
these program-specific term limitations.
Thus, if an individual serves two terms
of service in AmeriCorps NCCC and
exits from one for compelling personal
circumstances, that individual may be
able to enroll in a minimum time
AmeriCorps State and National or
AmeriCorps VISTA position, but will
not be able to enroll in another
AmeriCorps NCCC term because the
individual has already met the term
limit for that program. Because the limit
on the value of education awards an
individual may receive necessarily will
limit the number of terms an individual
will be able to serve across the
Corporation’s AmeriCorps and Silver
Scholar programs, the Corporation does
not intend to set an overall limit for
number of terms across programs at this
time.
Transfer of Education Awards (Part
2530)
The Serve America Act amended
Subtitle D of title I of the NCSA to
authorize individuals to transfer an
education award, with limitations on
who can transfer an award, and who can
receive a transferred award. By statute,
to transfer an award, an individual
must: (1) Have successfully completed a
term of service in an approved
AmeriCorps State and National or Silver
Scholar position; and (2) have been age
55 or older before beginning that term
of service. To receive an award, an
individual must: (1) Be designated by a
qualifying transferring individual; (2) be
the child, grandchild, or foster child of
the transferring individual; and (3) be a
citizen, national, or lawful permanent
resident alien of the United States. The
effective date of this provision was
October 1, 2009; only individuals
beginning service on or after that date
will be eligible to transfer an education
award.
Sec. 148(f) specifies that the
‘‘designated individual,’’ meaning the
child, grandchild, or foster child
designated by the transferring
individual to receive the award, may
use the award for the purposes
described in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d)
of that section—i.e., to repay qualified
student loans, to pay for current
educational expenses at an institution of
higher education, or to pay expenses
incurred in an approved school-to-work
program. The school-to-work program,
authorized under the School-to-Work
Opportunities Act of 1994, sunsetted in
2001, thus, in practice, the designated
individual would be able to use the
award only for current educational
expenses or to repay qualified student
loans. The NCSA does not extend the
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
8020
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
use of the award to pay expenses
incurred in enrolling in an institution or
training establishment approved under
the G.I. Bill to designated individuals,
nor does it permit designated
individuals to receive interest
forbearance payments as described in
Sec. 148(e).
This section of the NCSA also permits
a transferring individual to, ‘‘on any date
on which a portion of the education
award remains unused, modify or
revoke the transfer of the educational
award with respect to that portion.’’
This proposed rule adds a new Part
2530 on transfer, including rules
reflecting statutory guidelines, and
details on the processes for requesting
both transfers and revocations of
transferred awards. The NCSA also
includes a provision requiring the
Corporation to ‘‘establish requirements
to prevent waste, fraud, or abuse in
connection with the transfer of an
educational award and to protect the
integrity of the educational award under
this subsection.’’ This proposed rule
includes several measures intended to
protect a transferred education award
from waste, fraud, or abuse.
First, as part of the process for the
transferring individual to request the
transfer and the process for the
designated individual to accept the
transfer, the proposed rule would
require both the transferring individual
and the designated individual to
provide a certification under penalty of
law that each meets the criteria to
transfer, or receive, a transferred award.
As with all certifications, an individual
may be asked to produce verifying
documentation.
Second, the proposed rule would
limit an individual to making a single
transfer of an education award that is
attributable to a single term of service,
thereby limiting the opportunity for
waste, fraud, or abuse. In order to
transfer awards to more than one
designated individual, the transferring
individual will need to earn awards for
more than one term of service. Under no
circumstance may an individual
partition a single award attributable to
completion of a single term of service to
multiple designated individuals.
Notably, this proposed rule would
permit an individual to transfer all or a
portion of an award to a designated
individual, thus, the transferring
individual could keep a portion of the
award for his or her use, and transfer a
portion of the award to a designated
individual.
As stated above, a transferring
individual also has the authority to
revoke any unused portion of an
education award from a designated
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
individual. As another measure to
prevent waste, fraud, or abuse, and in
line with the Corporation’s intent to
limit individuals to a single transfer
from each award, a transferring
individual would not, as a general rule,
be permitted to re-transfer a revoked
award to another individual.
The proposed rule includes an
exception to this general rule for those
situations in which the Corporation
considers the award to have been
revoked for good cause, as demonstrated
by the transferring individual. For
example, if a transferring individual
revokes the full amount transferred
upon the death of a designated
individual, the Corporation would
permit the transferring individual to retransfer the award in whole or in part.
This proposed rule also includes
several clarifying provisions. As
discussed in the section in this rule on
the limitation on the value of education
awards an individual may receive, the
NCSA prohibits an individual from
receiving more than the aggregate value
of two education awards. Under this
proposed rule, an award would be
considered to be ‘‘received’’ at the time
it becomes available for an individual’s
use. The fact that an individual transfers
an award to a designated individual
would not decrease the value of awards
the individual would be considered to
have received. Transferred awards a
designated individual receives would
also be considered when calculating the
aggregate value of awards received.
For example, if an individual receives
two full-time awards, and transfers both
awards to a child, both the transferring
and designated individual will be
considered to have received the
aggregate value of two full-time awards,
and neither will be eligible to receive
additional AmeriCorps or Silver Scholar
awards from the National Service Trust.
Notably, because Summer of Service
education awards are not included in
the calculation of aggregate value of
education awards received, a designated
individual could still receive Summer of
Service education awards even if the
designated individual had already
received the aggregate value of two fulltime education awards. As discussed in
the section on calculating the value of
an education award, a transferred award
would have a value based on the
amount of a full-time education award
in the year the position on which the
transferring individual’s award was
based was approved.
Finally, under the national service
laws, an individual has seven years
from the date the individual completes
a term of service upon which an award
is based to use an award, and a
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
designated individual receiving a
transferred award has ten years from the
date the term of service is completed to
use the award. For example, if an
individual receives an award for a term
completed in 2010, and transfers the
award five years after receiving the
award, the designated individual would
have five years to use the award. In
accordance with these statutory time
frames, the proposed rule permits an
individual to revoke an award at any
point prior to its use, but the individual
may only use a revoked award for his
or her use if the award has not expired.
For example, if an individual received
an award for a term completed in 2010,
transferred the award five years after
receiving the award, and then revoked
the unused portion six years after
receiving the award, the transferring
individual would have only one year to
use the award. If, however, the
transferring individual had revoked the
award eight years after it was originally
earned, the award would expire
immediately upon revocation, because
although the award had not yet expired
for use by the designated individual, it
would have expired for the transferring
individual a year earlier.
Periods of Availability for Silver
Scholar, Summer of Service, and
Transferred Education Awards
(§ 2526.40)
Under Sec. 146 of the NCSA, the
period of availability for a Silver
Scholar education award is seven years
from the date the individual completes
a term of service. The period of
availability for a Summer of Service
education award is ten years from the
date the individual completes the term
of service. Individuals who receive a
transferred award may use the award
within ten years of the date the
transferring individual completes the
term of service that is the basis for the
award—not the date the designated
individual receives the transferred
award. For example, if an individual
transfers an award five years after the
date the individual completed the term
of service, the designated individual
would have five years to use the
award—ten years from the date the
transferring individual completed the
term of service. This proposed rule
amends section § 2526.40 to include
periods of availability for Silver Scholar,
Summer of Service, and transferred
education awards.
Similar to national service education
awards, Sec. 146 authorizes the
Corporation to grant an extension to the
period of availability for a Silver
Scholar education award, a Summer of
Service education award, or a
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
transferred award if the individual
requesting the extension ‘‘was
unavoidably prevented’’ from using the
education award or if the individual
‘‘performed another term of service in an
approved national service position,
approved summer of service position, or
approved silver scholar position during
that period.’’
The ten year period of availability for
transferred education awards has raised
questions about whether extensions will
be granted if a designated individual is
still too young to use an award by its
expiration date. The NCSA does not
specify a minimum age for the
designated individual. Thus, if an
individual transfers an award to a
grandchild who was four years old at
the time the individual completed the
term of service that was the basis of the
award, the ten year period of availability
will expire when the child is fourteen.
It is unlikely that, at that time, the child
would have had an opportunity to use
the education award, thus, the award
would expire unused.
Sec. 148(f) of the NCSA directs the
Corporation to ‘‘establish requirements
to prevent waste, fraud, or abuse in
connection with the transfer of an
educational award and to protect the
integrity of the educational award.’’ To
permit extensions for a designated
individual who is too young to use an
award would mean, in some cases,
extensions for up to nine years beyond
the original expiration date—nearly
twice the statutory period of
availability. The longer the period of
availability, the greater the risk of fraud,
waste, or abuse. Further, Congress
selected ten years as a reasonable period
of availability for a transferred award.
Based upon these considerations, this
proposed rule specifies that an
individual who is unable to use an
education award as a result of being too
young will not be considered to be
unavoidably prevented from using the
education award. Individuals wishing to
transfer an award will be reminded at
the time they request a transfer that
while there is no minimum age for a
designated individual, extensions based
on age will not be granted.
Certifications of Successful Completion
of Terms of Service (§ 2626.10)
The Serve America Act amended the
NCSA by adding a new section 146A,
which imposes a requirement that a
national service program certify under
penalty of law that an individual
successfully completed an agreed-upon
term of service to be eligible to receive
an education award from the National
Service Trust. Specifically Sec. 146A(a)
provides that, in making disbursements
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
from the National Service Trust, the
Corporation is authorized to act on the
basis of certifications that individuals
who served in approved AmeriCorps
positions, approved Summer of Service
positions, or approved Silver Scholar
positions, successfully completed the
term of service required to be eligible for
an education award. These certifications
must be made by the entity which
selected the individual to serve in the
position, and supervised the
individual’s performance of their
service. This proposed rule implements
Sec. 146A(a) by including the
certification requirement in the
determination of who is eligible to
receive an education award under
§ 2526.10(a)(2)(A), (C), and (D).
Effect of Erroneous Certifications of
Successful Completion of Terms of
Service (§ 2526.70)
Under Sec. 146A(b) of the NCSA, if
the Corporation finds that a certification
made under Sec. 146A(a) is erroneous or
incorrect, the Corporation shall assess a
charge against the national service
program which made the certification.
The charge is to be assessed for the
amount of any payment which the
Corporation has or may make from the
National Service Trust based on the
erroneous certification. In assessing the
amount of a charge, the Corporation is
to consider the full facts and
circumstances surrounding the
erroneous or incorrect certification.
This proposed rule implements Sec.
146A(b) and specifies that any
Corporation determination in regard to
a charge under § 2526.70 will not
preclude the Corporation from taking
any other actions which may be
warranted under other applicable
authorities, such as the Program Fraud
Civil Remedies Act.
Public Service Loan Forgiveness and
AmeriCorps (§ 2526.20)
On September 27, 2007, President
Bush signed the College Cost Reduction
and Access Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110–84)
into law. The CCRAA created the Public
Service Loan Forgiveness Program. This
program offers forgiveness for
outstanding Federal Direct loans for
those individuals who make 120
qualifying payments after October 1,
2007, while working full-time in a
‘‘public service job.’’ In the Department
of Education’s implementing rules,
‘‘public service job’’ has been defined to
include ‘‘serving in a full-time
AmeriCorps * * * position.’’ (34 CFR
685.219(c); 73 FR 63527, Oct. 23, 2008).
‘‘AmeriCorps position’’ as defined in
that section would include full-time
service in AmeriCorps State and
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8021
National, AmeriCorps NCCC,
AmeriCorps VISTA, and ServeAmerica
Fellowships.
Generally, an individual cannot
receive an education award and related
interest benefits from the National
Service Trust as well as other loan
cancellation benefits for the same
service. For example, the law
authorizing the Teacher Loan
Forgiveness Program (TLFP) explicitly
states that ‘‘no borrower may, for the
same service, receive a benefit under
this [program] and subtitle D of title I of
the National and Community Service
Act of 1990.’’ (20 U.S.C. 1078–10(g)(2)).
Thus, an AmeriCorps member serving in
a teacher corps program would have to
choose whether to count the service
year towards TLFP or AmeriCorps, but
would not be able take both benefits for
the same period of service.
The Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Program is an exception to this general
rule. Service performed by an
individual serving in a full-time
AmeriCorps position may be credited to
both an education award and Public
Service Loan Forgiveness.
This rule amends § 2526.60 to include
an exception to the general prohibition
on an individual’s receiving an
education award and related interest
benefits from the National Service Trust
as well as other loan cancellation
benefits for the Public Service Loan
Forgiveness Program.
For more information on qualifying
for Public Service Loan Forgiveness
while serving in AmeriCorps, please
visit: https://www.nationalservice.gov/
for_organizations/highered/ccraa.asp.
Term Limits for AmeriCorps State and
National (§ 2522.235)
AmeriCorps State and National is the
national service program funded under
subtitle C of title I of the NCSA. Prior
to passage of the Serve America Act,
Sec. 140(h) of the NCSA included a
limitation that no program could use
any Federal funds to support an
individual during a third term of service
in an AmeriCorps State and National
position. The Serve America Act
removed Sec. 140(h) of the NCSA,
thereby eliminating the statutory
limitation on the number of terms in
which one could be supported with
Federal funds while serving in
AmeriCorps State and National position.
The Serve America Act amended Sec.
146(c) by changing the limitation from
receiving awards for the first two terms
of service to receiving up to the value
of two full-time education awards. As
discussed in the section on the
limitation of education award receipt,
these amendments now give the
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
8022
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Corporation the flexibility to support a
single individual for more than two
terms of service in less-than-full-time
terms. The amendments do not
guarantee an individual may serve more
than two terms of service, nor do they
direct the Corporation to provide an
individual with the opportunity to serve
more than two terms of service. Rather,
the amended provision establishes a
new limitation that the Corporation
must enforce.
Theoretically, using the calculation
for the aggregate value of awards
received (discussed previously in this
preamble), without term limitations, an
individual could potentially serve as
few as two full-time terms, or as many
as 9 minimum-time terms, in
AmeriCorps State and National. The
number of minimum-time terms could
be even higher if an individual leaves
one or more terms for compelling
personal circumstances. A minimumtime term may be completed over two
years. Thus, without term limitations, a
single individual could potentially serve
in AmeriCorps State and National for
nearly 20 years.
By statute, one of the Corporation’s
guiding purposes is to ‘‘encourage
citizens of the United States * * * to
engage in full-time or part-time national
service.’’ In furtherance of this, the
Corporation’s longstanding policy is to
limit the number of terms an individual
may serve in an approved national
service position to ensure that there are
opportunities for all interested
Americans to serve. Increasingly,
applications for AmeriCorps far exceed
available positions. The Corporation’s
current limitation of two terms of
service in AmeriCorps State and
National means that, after a maximum
of two terms, a position will be available
for a new individual to have an
opportunity to serve.
As discussed previously in this
preamble, however, the Corporation
appreciates that the law as amended
affords more opportunities to serve for
those individuals who serve in lessthan-full-time positions. To balance the
increased flexibility afforded by the
amended statute with the Corporation’s
interest in providing more Americans an
opportunity to serve, the Corporation
proposes to double the number of
available terms in AmeriCorps State and
National from two to four. This would
provide twice as many opportunities as
were previously available, but would
place a reasonable limit in order to
ensure service opportunities are
available for other interested
participants.
This proposed rule amends
§ 2522.235 to limit the number of terms
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
an individual may serve in AmeriCorps
State and National to four. A term of
service includes full-time, part-time,
and reduced-part-time terms, as well as
any term from which one exits after
serving 15 percent of the agreed term of
service or a term from which one is
exited for misconduct. If a person leaves
for reasons other than misconduct prior
to serving 15%, the term is not
considered a term of service for the
purposes of this limitation. This does
not mean that an individual is
guaranteed four terms of service in
AmeriCorps State and National.
Exhaustion of the number of terms
one serves in AmeriCorps State and
National would not necessarily prevent
an individual from enrolling in a
position in another national service
program, such as AmeriCorps NCCC,
AmeriCorps VISTA, or Silver Scholars,
and receiving an education award for
successful completion of the service.
For example, if an individual serves
four minimum-time terms in
AmeriCorps State and National, for an
aggregate value of .85 education awards
received, the individual could enroll in
a term in another national service
program such as AmeriCorps VISTA,
AmeriCorps NCCC, or Silver Scholars.
However, under the proposed rule, an
individual may not enroll in any term
of service for which the successful
completion would result in receipt of an
award that, when combined with the
aggregate value of awards previously
received, would exceed the value of two
full-time education awards. Thus, if an
individual served for two full-time
terms of service in AmeriCorps State
and National and received two full-time
education awards, the individual would
not be eligible to enroll in any term in
AmeriCorps State and National,
AmeriCorps NCCC, AmeriCorps VISTA,
Silver Scholar, or other national service
program for which the successful
completion would result in the receipt
of an AmeriCorps or Silver Scholar
education award.
Please note that the Corporation’s
current regulatory limitation of two
terms of service in AmeriCorps State
and National fits within the current
statutory framework, and will remain in
effect until this proposed rule has been
finalized.
Selection Criteria Sub-Categories for
AmeriCorps State and National (Part
2522)
The Serve America Act amended
Subtitle C of title I of the NCSA by
placing greater emphasis on a grantee’s
impact. Programs are now described not
only in terms of their programmatic
activities and the unmet community
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
needs the programs are addressing, but
also in terms of ‘performance indicators’
that demonstrate the program’s impact.
Additionally, the NCSA now requires
the Corporation to each year fund at
least two of five statutorily described
programs, including programs that
address unmet education, health,
economic opportunity, veteran, and
clean energy needs. While the
Corporation can accommodate these
changes in future grant competitions
without changing our current published
selection criteria, the current ‘‘subcategories’’ of the basic selection criteria
and the published weights for the subcategories are an imperfect fit for the
increased emphasis on performance and
funding of programs addressing
particular community needs.
This proposed rule would remove
§§ 2522.425–435, the sections that
describe the sub-categories of the three
basic selection criteria, as well as
§§ 2522.445–448, the sections that set
out the weights given to the subcategories.
The Corporation will, in the future,
publish specific sub-categories for the
basic selection criteria as well as
funding priorities in the Notice of Funds
Availability. This will enable the
Corporation to adjust application
components and the weights given to
sub-components. Additionally, this will
further the Corporation’s continued
efforts to simplify the application
process, as supported by the Serve
America Act.
The Corporation will continue to use
a multi-stage process, including review
by a panel of experts, and will continue
to make funding decisions based on the
same basic selection criteria of program
design, organizational capability, and
cost-effectiveness and budget adequacy.
The weights given to the basic selection
criteria—50% for program design, 25%
for organizational capability, and 25%
for cost-effectiveness and budget
adequacy—would not change. The
change in location of published subcategories and their respective weights
does not signify a change in the
Corporation’s standards for
transparency, clarity, and consistency in
considering applications; all applicants
will be made aware of sub-categories of
selection criteria in advance of the
application and review process.
Please note that for the 2010
AmeriCorps State and National grant
competition, the currently published
selection criteria, sub-categories, and
weights remain in effect.
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Applications for the Same Project
(§ 2522.320)
The Serve America Act amended Sec.
130(g) of the NCSA, which previously
required the Corporation to ‘‘reject an
application * * * if a project proposed
to be conducted using assistance
requested by the applicant is already
described in another application
pending before the Corporation.’’ As
amended, this section now prohibits the
Corporation from providing ‘‘more than
[one] grant under the national service
laws for a fiscal year to support the
same project under the national service
laws.’’ This provision, as amended,
supports the Corporation’s longstanding
practice not to provide more than one
grant to the same project. In addition,
the revised language increases the
Corporation’s flexibility in structuring
its grant application review process.
This proposed rule aligns the
regulations with the amended statute by
removing the regulatory conditions
under which an applicant may submit
multiple applications for the same
project. In the future, the Corporation
will include guidance on applying for
different funds for the same project in
the grant application instructions. For
the purposes of preventing the same
project from receiving more than one
grant under the national service laws,
the Corporation will continue to use the
characteristics currently listed in
§ 2522.340 when determining whether
two projects are the same.
Please note that the current
regulations at §§ 2522.320–330
prohibiting the submission of more than
one application for the same project in
a single competition remain in effect for
the 2010 AmeriCorps State and National
grant competition.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Pre-Approval of Formula Programs
(§ 2550.80)
Sec. 130(f) of the NCSA was amended
by the Serve America Act by removing
the requirement that a State’s
application for Subtitle C (of title I of
the NCSA) formula funds include an
assurance that formula programs be
selected on a competitive basis prior to
submission of the application. This
amendment aligns with language from
the Corporation’s annual appropriations
and conforms to current practice. States
continue to be required to provide an
assurance that formula programs will be
selected on a competitive basis,
however, States may select these
programs after submitting the
application for Subtitle C formula funds.
This proposed rule amends § 2550.80 to
reflect this change.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Hardship Waiver Permitted for Cost
Reimbursement Cap for Senior
Companion and Foster Grandparent
Programs (§§ 2551.92, 2552.92)
Under current regulations, the total of
cost reimbursements attributable to
Senior Companions or Foster
Grandparents, including stipends,
insurance, transportation, meals,
physical examinations, and recognition,
may not exceed 80 percent of the
Federal share of the grant award.
Because of the financial challenges
faced by some organizations as a result
of the recent economic downtown and
the real potential for a decrease in nonFederal support, the proposed rule
permits the Corporation to allow an
exception to the 80 percent limit in
cases of demonstrated need.
Demonstrated need would include
initial difficulties in developing local
funding sources in the first three years
of operation; an economic downturn,
natural disaster, or other similar event
that severely reduces sources of local
funding support; or the unexpected
discontinuation of a long-term local
funding source.
SUMMARY OF REDESIGNATIONS
Previous location
Proposed location
§ 2522.220(c)
§ 2522.220(d)
§ 2522.220(e)
§ 2522.220(f)
§ 2522.220(g)
Part 2530
Part 2531
Part 2532
§ 2522.220(b)
§ 2522.220(c)
§ 2522.220(d)
§ 2522.220(e)
§ 2522.220(f)
Part 2531
Part 2532
Part 2533
IV. Effective Dates
The Corporation intends to make any
final rule based on this proposed rule
effective no sooner than 30 days after
the final rule is published in the Federal
Register. We will include an
implementation schedule in the final
rule, based on the final rule’s date of
publication.
V. Non-Regulatory Issues
Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866, the
Chief Executive Officer must determine
whether this regulatory action is
‘‘significant’’ and therefore subject to the
requirements of the Executive Order and
review by OMB. Section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 defines a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as an
action likely to result in a rule that may
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8023
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local or Tribal governments, or
communities in a material way (also
referred to as an ‘‘economically
significant’’ rule); (2) create serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) materially alter the
budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights
and obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) create novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive order. The
Chief Executive Officer has determined
that this regulatory action is not
significant under the Executive Order.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Corporation has determined that
the regulatory action will not result in
(1) An annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; (2) a major
increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; or (3)
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets. Therefore, the
Corporation has not performed the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis that
is required under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) for
major rules that are expected to have
such results.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Sections 2526.10, 2528.10, 2528.30,
2528.40, 2528.60, 2528.70, 2529.10,
2530.30, and 2530.85 contain
information collection requirements.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)), the
Corporation has submitted a copy of
these sections to the Office of
Management Budget (OMB) for its
review.
Section 2526.10 identifies two new
categories of individuals eligible to
receive education awards—individuals
who have successfully completed terms
of service in Silver Scholar and Summer
of Service positions. The proposed
addition requires the development of
new enrollment and exit forms for the
National Service Trust for individuals
enrolling in and exiting from Silver
Scholar or Summer of Service positions.
The Corporation estimates the burden
associated with filling out a Silver
Scholar or Summer of Service
enrollment form to be 3 minutes and a
Silver Scholar or Summer of Service
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
8024
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
exit form to be 3 minutes. Additionally,
§ 2526.10 requires the program
supervising the participant to certify
that the participant met eligibility
criteria and successfully completed the
required term of service. The proposed
change affects those programs who
supervise the participants. The burden
hour estimate associated with the
current exit form reported under OMB
Control Number 3045–0015 is 3
minutes. The Corporation does not
expect the proposed changes to increase
the burden for this collection.
Section 2528.10 expands the available
uses of an education award to include
use for current educational expenses
incurred in enrolling in an educational
institution or training establishment
approved for educational benefits under
the Montgomery G.I. Bill for offering
programs of education, apprenticeship,
or on-job training for which educational
assistance may be provided by the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs. Sections
2528.60–70 lay out the processes for
requesting to use an award for this
purpose. These proposed provisions
affect individuals who choose to use
education awards for this purpose, and
the educational institutions or training
establishments at which such
individuals elect to use their awards.
The burden hour estimate associated
with the current voucher and payment
request form reported under OMB
Control Number 3045–0014 is 5
minutes. The Corporation does not
expect the proposed additions to
increase the burden for this collection.
Section 2529.10 expands the
availability of payments on accrued
interest to individuals who successfully
complete terms of service in Silver
Scholar positions. This affects those
individuals who serve in Silver Scholar
programs and elect to place qualified
student loans in forbearance, and
request accrued interest payments from
the National Service Trust. The burden
hour estimate associated with the
current forbearance request form and
interest accrual form, reported under
OMB Control Numbers 3045–0030 and
3045–0053 are 1 minute and 10
minutes, respectively. The Corporation
does not expect the proposed changes to
increase the burdens for these
collections.
Sections 2530.30 and 2530.85 set
forth the processes for requesting to
transfer an award, accepting a
transferred award, and revoking a
transferred award. This affects those
individuals who choose to transfer their
education awards and those individuals
receiving awards via transfer. The
Corporation estimates the burden
associated with requesting to transfer an
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
award and accepting a transferred award
to be 5 minutes, and the burden
associated with revoking a transferred
award to be 5 minutes.
List of Subjects
Grant programs—social programs,
Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2522
Grants administration, Grant
programs—social programs, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2525
Grant programs—social programs,
Student aid, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2526
Education, Grant programs—social
programs, Student aid, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2527
Education, Grant programs—social
programs, Student aid, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2528
Education, Grant programs—social
programs, Student aid, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2529
Education, Grant programs—social
programs, Student aid, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2530
Education, Grant programs—social
programs, Student aid, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2531
Grant programs—social programs.
45 CFR Part 2532
Grant programs—social programs,
Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2533
Grants administration, Grant
programs—social programs.
45 CFR Part 2550
Grants administration, Grant
programs—social programs.
45 CFR Part 2551
Grants administration, Grant
programs—social programs, Volunteers.
45 CFR Part 2552
Grants administration, Grant
programs—social programs, Volunteers.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, under the authority 42 U.S.C.
12651d, the Corporation for National
and Community Service proposes to
amend chapter XXV, title 45 of the Code
of Federal Regulations, as follows:
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
1. The authority citation for Part 2510
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12501 et seq.
45 CFR Part 2510
PO 00000
PART 2510—OVERALL PURPOSES
AND DEFINITIONS
Sfmt 4702
2. Amend § 2510.20 by adding
definitions for ‘‘Approved Silver Scholar
position’’ and ‘‘Approved Summer of
Service position’’ in alphabetical order,
to read as follows:
§ 2510.20
Definitions
*
*
*
*
*
Approved Silver Scholar Position. The
term approved Silver Scholar position
means a Silver Scholar position for
which the Corporation has approved a
Silver Scholar education award.
Approved Summer of Service
Position. The term approved Summer of
Service position means a Summer of
Service position for which the
Corporation has approved a Summer of
Service education award.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 2522—AMERICORPS
PARTICIPANTS, PROGRAMS, AND
APPLICANTS
3. The authority citation for Part 2522
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12571–12595;
12651b–12651d; E.O. 13331, 69 FR 9911.
4. Amend § 2522.220 by:
a. Revising the heading;
b. Removing paragraph (b);
c. Redesignating paragraphs (c)
through (g) as (b) through (f),
respectively; and
d. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (b).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 2522.220 What are the required terms of
service for AmeriCorps participants?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Eligibility for subsequent term. A
participant will only be eligible to serve
a subsequent term of service if that
individual has received satisfactory
performance review(s) for any previous
term(s) of service in an approved
AmeriCorps position, in accordance
with the requirements of paragraph (d)
of this section and § 2526.15. Mere
eligibility for a second or further term of
service in no way guarantees a
participant selection or placement.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Amend § 2522.230 by:
a. Revising paragraphs (b)(6) and
(b)(7); and
b. Revising paragraph (e).
The revisions read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
§ 2522.230 Under what circumstances may
AmeriCorps participants be released from
completing a term of service, and what are
the consequences?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) An individual’s eligibility for a
subsequent term of service in
AmeriCorps will not be affected by
release for cause from a prior term of
service so long as the individual
received a satisfactory end-of-term
performance review as described in
§ 2522.220(d)(2) for the period served in
the prior term.
(7) Except as provided in paragraph
(e) of this section, a term of service from
which an individual is released for
cause counts as one of the terms of
service described in § 2522.235 for
which an individual may receive the
benefits described in §§ 2522.240
through 2522.250.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Release prior to serving 15 percent
of a term of service. If a participant is
released for reasons other than
misconduct prior to completing 15
percent of a term of service, the term
will not be considered to be one of the
terms of service described in
§ 2522.220(b) for which an individual
may receive the benefits described in
§§ 2522.240 through 2522.250.
6. Add a new § 2522.235 to read as
follows:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 2522.235 Is there a limit on the number
of terms an individual may serve in an
AmeriCorps State and National program?
(a) General limitation. An individual
may receive the benefits described in
§§ 2522.240 through 2522.250 for no
more than four terms of service in an
AmeriCorps State and National
program, regardless of whether those
terms were served on a full-, part-, or
reduced part-time basis, consistent with
the limitations in § 2526.50.
(b) Early release. Except as provided
in paragraph (c) of this section, a term
of service from which an individual is
released for compelling personal
circumstances or for cause counts as one
of the terms of service for which an
individual may receive the benefits
described in § 2522.240 through
§ 2522.250.
(c) Release prior to serving fifteen
percent of a term. If a person is released
for reasons other than misconduct prior
to completing fifteen percent of a term
of service, the term will not be
considered one of the terms of service
for which an individual may receive the
benefits described in §§ 2522.240
through 2522.250.
7. Amend § 2522.240 by:
a. Revising paragraph (a); and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
b. Removing the reference to
§ 2522.220(g) in paragraph (c) and
adding a reference to § 2522.220(f) in its
place.
The revision will read as follows:
§ 2522.240 What financial benefits do
AmeriCorps participants serving in
approved AmeriCorps positions receive?
(a) AmeriCorps educational awards.
An individual serving in an approved
AmeriCorps State and National position
will receive an educational award from
the National Service Trust upon
successful completion of each of no
more than four terms of service as
defined in § 2522.220, consistent with
the limitations in § 2526.50.
*
*
*
*
*
§§ 2522.320, 2522.330, 2522.425,
2522.430, 2522.435, 2522.445, and
2522.448 [Removed and Reserved]
8. Remove and reserve §§ 2522.320,
2522.330, 2522.425, 2522.430, 2522.435,
2522.445, and 2522.448.
PART 2525—NATIONAL SERVICE
TRUST: PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS
9. The authority citation for Part 2525
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12601–12606.
10. Amend § 2525.20 by:
a. Removing the definition for
‘‘approved school-to-work program’’;
b. Revising the definitions for
‘‘education award’’ and ‘‘term of service’’;
and
c. Adding definitions for ‘‘AmeriCorps
education award,’’ ‘‘economically
disadvantaged youth,’’ ‘‘Silver Scholar
education award,’’ and ‘‘Summer of
Service education award’’ in
alphabetical order, to read as follows:
§ 2525.20
[Amended]
*
*
*
*
*
AmeriCorps education award. For the
purposes of this section, the term
AmeriCorps education award means the
financial assistance available under
parts 2526 through 2528 of this chapter
for which an individual in an approved
AmeriCorps position may be eligible.
*
*
*
*
*
Economically disadvantaged youth.
For the purposes of this section, the
phrase economically disadvantaged
youth means a child who is eligible for
a free lunch and breakfast under the
Richard B. Russell National School
Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(b)).
Education award. For the purposes of
this section, the term education award
refers to the financial assistance
available under parts 2526 through 2528
of this chapter, including AmeriCorps
education awards, Silver Scholar
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8025
education awards, and Summer of
Service education awards.
*
*
*
*
*
Silver Scholar education award. For
the purposes of this section, the term
Silver Scholar education award means
the financial assistance available under
parts 2526 through 2528 of this chapter
for which an individual in an approved
Silver Scholar position may be eligible.
Summer of Service education award.
For the purposes this section, the term
Summer of Service education award
means the financial assistance available
under parts 2526 through 2528 of this
chapter for which an individual in an
approved Summer of Service position
may be eligible.
Term of service. The term term of
service means—
(1) For an individual serving in an
approved AmeriCorps position, one of
the terms of service specified in
§ 2522.220 of this chapter;
(2) For an individual serving in an
approved Silver Scholar position, not
less than 350 hours during a one-year
period; and
(3) For an individual serving in an
approved Summer of Service position,
not less than 100 hours during the
summer months.
PART 2526—ELIGIBILITY FOR AN
EDUCATION AWARD
11. The authority citation for Part
2526 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12601–12604, 12606.
12. Amend § 2526.10 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 2526.10 Who is eligible to receive an
education award from the National Service
Trust?
(a) General. An individual is eligible
to receive an education award from the
National Service Trust if the
organization responsible for the
individual’s supervision in a national
service program certifies that the
individual—
(1) Met the applicable eligibility
requirements for the approved
AmeriCorps position, approved Silver
Scholar position, or approved Summer
of Service position, as appropriate, in
which the individual served;
(2)(i) For an AmeriCorps education
award, successfully completed the
required term of service in the approved
national service position;
(ii) For a partial AmeriCorps
education award, completed at least 15
percent of the originally-approved term
of service, and performed satisfactorily
prior to being granted a release for
compelling personal circumstances
consistent with § 2522.230(a);
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
8026
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(iii) For a Summer of Service
education award, successfully
completed the required term of service
in a Summer of Service position; or
(iv) For a Silver Scholar education
award, successfully completed the
required term of service in a Silver
Scholar position; and
(3) Is a citizen, national, or lawful
permanent resident alien of the United
States.
*
*
*
*
*
13. Add a new § 2526.15 to read as
follows:
§ 2526.15 Upon what basis may an
organization responsible for the
supervision of a national service participant
certify that the individual successfully
completed a term of service?
(a) An organization responsible for the
supervision of an individual serving in
an AmeriCorps State and National
position will determine whether an
individual successfully completed a
term of service based upon an end-ofterm evaluation conducted pursuant to
§ 2522.220(d).
(b) An organization responsible for
the supervision of an individual serving
in a program other than AmeriCorps
State and National will determine
whether an individual successfully
completed a term of service based upon
an end-of-term evaluation that examines
whether the individual:
(1) Completed the required number of
service hours for the term of service;
(2) Satisfactorily performed on
assignments, tasks, or projects; and
(3) Met any performance criteria as
determined by the program and
communicated to the member.
(c) A certification by the organization
responsible for the supervision of an
individual that the individual did or did
not successfully complete a term of
service will be deemed to incorporate an
end-of-term evaluation.
14. Amend § 2526.20 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 2526.20 Is an AmeriCorps participant
who does not complete an originallyapproved term of service eligible to receive
a pro-rated education award?
(a) Compelling personal
circumstances. A participant in an
approved AmeriCorps position who is
released prior to completing an
approved term of service for compelling
personal circumstances in accordance
with § 2522.230(a) is eligible for a prorated education award if the
participant—
(1) Performed satisfactorily prior to
being granted a release for compelling
personal circumstances; and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
(2) Completed at least 15 percent of
the originally-approved term of service.
*
*
*
*
*
15. Add a new § 2526.25 to read as
follows:
§ 2526.25 Is a participant in an approved
Summer of Service position or approved
Silver Scholar position who does not
complete an approved term of service
eligible to receive a pro-rated education
award?
No. An individual released for any
reason prior to completing an approved
term of service in a Silver Scholar or
Summer of Service position is not
eligible to receive a pro-rated award.
16. Revise § 2526.40 to read as
follows:
§ 2526.40 What is the time period during
which an individual may use an education
award?
(a) General requirement. Unless the
Corporation approves an extension in
accordance with the requirements of
paragraph (b) of this section—
(1) An individual may use an
AmeriCorps education award or a Silver
Scholar education award within seven
years of the date on which the
individual successfully completed a
term of service in an approved
AmeriCorps or Silver Scholar position;
(2) An individual may use a Summer
of Service education award within ten
years of the date on which the
individual successfully completed a
term of service in an approved Summer
of Service position;
(3) A designated individual who
receives a transferred education award
in accordance with § 2530.10 may use
the transferred education award within
ten years of the date on which the
individual who transferred the award
successfully completed the term of
service in an approved AmeriCorps or
Silver Scholar position that is the basis
of the award.
(b) Extensions. In order to receive an
extension of the period of availability
specified in paragraph (a) of this section
for using an education award, an
individual must apply to the
Corporation for an extension prior to the
end of that time period. The Corporation
will grant an application for an
extension under the following
circumstances:
(1) If the Corporation determines that
an individual was performing another
term of service in an approved
AmeriCorps, Summer of Service, or
Silver Scholar position during the
original period of availability, the
Corporation will grant an extension for
a time period that is equivalent to the
time period during which the individual
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
was performing the other term of
service.
(2) If the Corporation determines that
an individual was unavoidably
prevented from using the education
award during the original period of
availability, the Corporation will grant
an extension for a period of time that
the Corporation deems appropriate. An
individual who is ineligible to use an
education award as a result of the
individual’s conviction of the
possession or sale of a controlled
substance is not considered to be
unavoidably prevented from using the
education award for the purposes of this
paragraph. In the case of a transferred
award, an individual who is unable to
use an education award as a result of
being too young to enroll in an
institution of higher education or other
training establishment is not considered
to be unavoidably prevented from using
the education award.
17. Revise § 2526.50 to read as
follows:
§ 2526.50 Is there a limit on the total
amount of education awards an individual
may receive?
(a) General Limitation. No individual
may receive more than an amount equal
to the aggregate value of two full-time
education awards.
(b) Calculation of the value of an
education award. For the purposes of
this section, the value of an education
award is equal to the actual amount of
the education award received divided
by the amount of a full-time education
award in the year the AmeriCorps or
Silver Scholar position to which the
award is attributed was approved. Each
award received will be considered to
have a value between 0 and 1. Although
the amount of a full-time award as
defined in § 2527.10(a) may change, the
value of a full-time award will always
be equal to 1.
(c) Calculation of aggregate value of
awards received. The aggregate value of
awards received is equal to the sum of:
(1) The value of each education award
received as a result of successful
completion of an approved AmeriCorps
position;
(2) The value of each partial
education award received as a result of
release from an approved AmeriCorps
position for compelling personal
circumstances;
(3) The value of each education award
received as a result of successful
completion of a term of service in an
approved Silver Scholar position; and
(4) The value of any amount received
as a transferred education award, except
as provided in § 2530.60(c).
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(d) Determination of Receipt of
Award. For purposes of determining the
aggregate value of education awards, an
award is considered to be received at
the time it becomes available for an
individual’s use.
18. Add a new § 2526.55 to read as
follows:
§ 2526.55 What is the impact of the
aggregate value of education awards
received on an individual’s ability to enroll
in subsequent terms of service?
No individual may enroll in a
subsequent term of service if successful
completion of that term of service
would result in receipt of an education
award the value of which, when added
to the aggregate value of awards
previously received, would be greater
than 2.
19. Revise § 2526.60 to read as
follows:
§ 2526.60 May an individual receive an
education award and related interest
benefits from the National Service Trust as
well as other loan cancellation benefits for
the same service?
An individual may not receive an
education award and related interest
benefits from the National Service Trust
for a term of service and have that same
service credited toward repayment,
discharge, or cancellation of other
student loans, except as provided under
31 CFR 685.219.
20. Add a new § 2526.70 to read as
follows:
§ 2526.70 What are the effects of an
erroneous certification of successful
completion of a term of service?
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) If the Corporation determines that
the certification made by an national
service program under § 2526.10(a)(2)(i),
(iii), or (iv) is erroneous, the Corporation
shall assess against the national service
program a charge for the amount of any
associated payment or potential
payment from the National Service
Trust, taking into consideration the full
facts and circumstances surrounding the
erroneous or incorrect certification.
(b) Nothing in this section shall
prohibit the Corporation from taking
any action authorized by law based
upon any certification that is knowingly
made in a false, materially misleading,
or fraudulent manner.
PART 2527—DETERMINING THE
AMOUNT OF AN EDUCATION AWARD
22. Amend § 2527.10 by:
a. Revising the heading;
b. Revising paragraphs (a), (b), and (c);
and
Jkt 220001
(a) Full-time term of service. The
education award for a full-time term of
service in an approved AmeriCorps
position of at least 1,700 hours will be
equal to the maximum amount of a
Federal Pell Grant under section 401 of
the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 1070a) that a student eligible for
such grant may receive in the aggregate
for the award year in which the term of
service is approved by the Corporation.
(b) Part-time term of service. The
education award for a part-time term of
service in an approved AmeriCorps
position of at least 900 hours is equal to
one half of the amount of an education
award amount for a full-time term of
service described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(c) Reduced part-time term of service.
The education award for a reduced parttime term of service in an approved
AmeriCorps position of fewer than 900
hours is an amount equal to the product
of:
(1) The number of hours of service
required to complete the reduced parttime term of service divided by 900; and
(2) The amount of the education
award for a part-time term of service
described in paragraph (b) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Summer of Service Education
Award. (1) In general. The education
award for a term of service in an
approved Summer of Service position
for at least 100 hours is $500.
(2) Exception. The Corporation may
authorize a Summer of Service
education award of $750 if the
participant is economically
disadvantaged, as certified by the school
operating the Summer of Service
program.
(f) Silver Scholar Education Award.
The education award for a term of
service in an approved Silver Scholar
position for at least 350 hours is $1,000.
PART 2528—USING AN EDUCATION
AWARD
23. The authority citation for Part
2528 is revised to read as follows:
24. Revise § 2528.10(a)(3) to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12601–12606.
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
§ 2527.10 What is the amount of an
education award?
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12601–12606.
21. The authority citation for Part
2527 is revised to read as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
c. Adding new paragraphs (e) and (f).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 2528.10
[Amended]
(a) * * *
(3) To pay expenses incurred in
enrolling in an educational institution
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8027
or training establishment approved for
educational benefits under the
Montgomery G.I. Bill (38 U.S.C. 3670 et
seq.) for offering programs of education,
apprenticeship, or on-job training for
which educational assistance may be
provided by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs, in accordance with §§ 2528.60,
2528.70, and 2529.80.
25. Revise § 2528.30(a)(2)(vi)(A) and
(B) to read as follows:
§ 2528.30
[Amended]
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) * * *
(A) The individual’s cost of
attendance and other educational
expenses; and
(B) The individual’s estimated student
financial assistance for that period
under part A of title IV of the Higher
Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.).
*
*
*
*
*
26. Revise § 2528.40(a) and (b) to read
as follows:
§ 2528.40 Is there a limit on the amount of
an individual’s education award that the
Corporation will disburse to an institution
of higher education for a given period of
enrollment?
*
*
*
*
*
(a) The individual’s cost of attendance
and other educational expenses,
determined by the institution of higher
education in accordance with section
472 of the Higher Education Act of 1965
(20 U.S.C. 1987ll); and
(b) The individual’s estimated
financial assistance for that period
under part A of title IV of the Higher
Education Act.
27. Revise § 2528.60 to read as
follows:
§ 2528.60 Who may use the education
award to pay expenses incurred in an
educational institution or training
establishment approved for educational
benefits under the Montgomery G.I. Bill?
To use the education award to pay
expenses incurred in enrolling at an
educational institution or training
establishment in a program of education
approved by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs (38 U.S.C. 3670 et seq.), you
must have received an education award
for successfully completing a term in an
approved AmeriCorps position,
approved Summer of Service position,
or approved Silver Scholar position, in
which you enrolled on or after October
1, 2009.
28. Revise § 2528.70 to read as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
8028
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
§ 2528.70 What steps are necessary to use
an education award to pay expenses
incurred in enrolling at an educational
institution or training establishment in a
program of education approved by the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs?
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) Required Information. Before
disbursing an amount from an education
award to pay for expenses incurred in
enrolling at an educational institution or
training establishment in a program of
education approved by the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs (38 U.S.C. 3670 et seq.),
the Corporation must receive—
(1) An individual’s written
authorization and request for a specific
payment amount;
(2) Verification from the individual
that the individual meets the criteria in
§ 2528.60; and
(3) Information from the educational
institution or training establishment as
requested by the Corporation, including
verification that—
(i) The amount requested will be used
to pay all or part of the individual’s
expenses attributable to a course,
program of education, apprenticeship,
or job training offered by the institution
or establishment;
(ii) The course(s) or program(s) for
which the individual is requesting to
use the education award has been and
is currently approved by the State
approving agency for the State where
the institution or establishment is
located, or by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs; and
(iii) If an individual who has used an
education award withdraws or
otherwise fails to complete the period of
enrollment for which the education
award was provided, the institution or
establishment will ensure a pro-rata
refund to the Corporation of the unused
portion of the education award.
(b) Payment. When the Corporation
receives the information required under
paragraph (a) of this section, the
Corporation will pay the institution or
establishment and notify the individual
of the payment.
29. Add a new § 2528.80 to read as
follows:
§ 2528.80 What happens if an individual
for whom the Corporation has disbursed
education award funds withdraws or fails to
complete the period of enrollment at an
educational institution or training
establishment in a program of education
approved by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs?
(a) If an individual for whom the
Corporation has disbursed education
award funds withdraws or otherwise
fails to complete a period of enrollment,
the approved educational institution or
training establishment that receives a
disbursement of education award funds
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
from the Corporation must provide a
pro-rata refund to the Corporation of the
unused portion of the education award.
(b) The Corporation will credit any
refund received for an individual under
paragraph (a) of this section to the
individual’s education award allocation
in the National Service Trust.
PART 2529—PAYMENT OF ACCRUED
INTEREST
30. The authority citation of Part 2529
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12601–12606.
31. Amend § 2529.10 by revising the
heading and paragraph (a)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 2529.10 Under what circumstances will
the Corporation pay interest that accrues
on qualified student loans during an
individual’s term of service in an approved
AmeriCorps position or approved Silver
Scholar position?
(a) * * *
(1) The individual successfully
completes a term of service in an
approved AmeriCorps position or
approved Silver Scholar position; and
*
*
*
*
*
PARTS 2530, 2531, 2532, AND 2533
[REDESIGNATED AS PARTS 2531,
2532, 2533, AND 2534]
32. Redesignate parts 2530, 2531,
2532, and 2533 as parts 2531, 2532,
2533 and 2534, respectively
33. Add a new Part 2530 to read as
follows:
PART 2530—TRANSFER OF
EDUCATION AWARDS
Sec.
2530.10 Under what circumstances may an
individual transfer an education award?
2530.20 For what purposes may a
transferred award be used?
2530.30 What steps are necessary to transfer
an education award?
2530.40 Is there a limit on the number of
individuals one may designate to receive
a transferred award?
2530.50 Is there a limit on the amount of
transferred awards a designated
individual may receive?
2530.60 What is the impact of transferring
or receiving a transferred education
award on an individual’s eligibility to
receive additional education awards?
2530.70 Is a designated individual required
to accept a transferred education award?
2530.80 Is an award revocable once
transferred?
2530.90 Is a designated individual eligible
for the payment of accrued interest
under part 2529?
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12601–12606.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 2530.10 Under what circumstances may
an individual transfer an education award?
An individual may transfer an
education award to the individual’s
child, grandchild, or foster child if—
(a) The individual enrolled in an
approved AmeriCorps State and
National position or approved Silver
Scholar position on or after October 1,
2009;
(b) The individual was age 55 or older
on the day the individual commenced
the term of service in an approved
AmeriCorps State and National position
or in approved Silver Scholar position;
(c) The individual successfully
completed a term of service in an
approved AmeriCorps State and
National position or an approved Silver
Scholar position;
(d) The award the individual is
requesting to transfer has not expired,
consistent with the period of availability
set forth in § 2526.40(a);
(e) The individual designated to
receive the transferred award is the
transferring individual’s child,
grandchild, or foster child; and
(f) The individual designated to
receive the transferred award is a
citizen, national, or lawful permanent
resident alien of the United States.
§ 2530.20 For what purposes may a
transferred award be used?
A transferred award may be used by
a designated individual to repay
qualified student loans or to pay current
educational expenses at an institution of
higher education, as described in
§ 2528.10.
§ 2530.30 What steps are necessary to
transfer an education award?
(a) Request for Transfer. Before
transferring an award to a designated
individual, the Corporation must
receive a request from the transferring
individual, including—
(1) The individual’s written
authorization to transfer the award, the
year in which the award was earned,
and the specific amount of the award to
be transferred;
(2) Identifying information for the
individual designated to receive the
transferred award;
(3) A certification that the transferring
individual meets the requirements of
§ 2530.10; and
(4) A certification that the designated
individual is the child, grandchild, or
foster child of the transferring
individual.
(b) Notification to Designated
Individual. Upon receipt of a request
including all required information listed
in paragraph (a) of this section, the
Corporation will contact the designated
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
individual to notify the individual of
the proposed transfer, confirm the
individual’s identity, and give the
individual the opportunity to accept or
reject the transferred award.
(c) Acceptance by Designated
Individual. To accept an award, a
designated individual must certify that
the designated individual is the child,
grandchild, or foster child of the
transferring individual and that the
designated individual is a citizen,
national, or lawful permanent resident
alien of the United States. Upon receipt
of the designated individual’s
acceptance, the Corporation will create
an account in the National Service Trust
for the designated individual, if an
account does not already exist, and the
accepted amount will be deducted from
the transferring individual’s account
and credited to the designated
individual’s account.
(d) Timing of transfer. The
Corporation must receive the request
from the transferring individual prior to
the date the award expires.
§ 2530.40 Is there a limit on the number of
individuals one may designate to receive a
transferred award?
(a) General Limitation. For each
award an individual earns as a result of
successfully completing a single term of
service, an individual may transfer all or
part of the award to a single designated
individual. An individual may not
transfer a single award attributable to
successful completion of a single term
of service to more than one designated
individual.
(b) Re-transfer. If a designated
individual rejects a transferred award in
full, or the Corporation determines that
an award was revoked for good cause in
accordance with § 2530.80(c), the
transferring individual may designate
another individual to receive the
transferred award.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 2530.50 Is there a limit on the amount of
transferred awards a designated individual
may receive?
Consistent with § 2526.50, no
individual may receive more than an
amount equal to the value of two fulltime education awards. If the sum of the
value of the requested transfer plus the
aggregate value of educational awards a
designated individual has previously
received would exceed the aggregate
value of two full-time education awards,
as determined pursuant to § 2526.50(b),
the designated individual will be
deemed to have rejected that portion of
the award that would result in the
excess. If a designated individual has
already received the aggregate value of
two full-time education awards, the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
individual may not receive a transferred
award, and the designated individual
will be deemed to have rejected the
award in full.
§ 2530.60 What is the impact of
transferring or receiving a transferred
education award on an individual’s
eligibility to receive additional education
awards?
(a) Impact on Transferring Individual.
Pursuant to § 2526.50, an award is
considered to be received at the time it
becomes available for an individual’s
use. Transferring all or part of an award
does not reduce the aggregate value of
education awards the transferring
individual is considered to have
received.
(b) Impact on Designated Individual.
For the purposes of determining the
value of the transferred education award
under § 2526.50, a designated
individual will be considered to have
received a value equal to the amount
accepted divided by the amount of a
full-time award in the year the
transferring individual’s position was
approved.
(c) Result of revocation on award
value. If the transferring individual
revokes all or part of a transferred
education award, the value of the
education award considered to have
been received by the designated
individual for purposes of § 2526.50
will be reduced accordingly.
§ 2530.70 Is a designated individual
required to accept a transferred education
award?
(a) General Rule. A designated
individual is not required to accept a
transferred education award, and may
reject an award in whole or in part.
(b) Result of rejection in full. If the
designated individual rejects a
transferred award in whole, the amount
is credited to the transferring
individual’s account in the National
Service Trust, and may be transferred to
another individual, or may be used by
the transferring individual for any of the
purposes listed in § 2528.10, consistent
with the original time period of
availability set forth in § 2526.40(a).
(c) Result of rejection in part. If the
designated individual rejects a
transferred award in part, the rejected
portion is credited to the transferring
individual’s account in the National
Service Trust, and may be used by the
transferring individual’s for any of the
purposes listed in § 2528.10, consistent
with the original time period of
availability set forth in § 2526.40(a). An
individual may not re-transfer the
rejected portion of the award to another
individual.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8029
§ 2530.80 Is an award revocable once
transferred?
(a) Revocation. An individual may
revoke a transferred education award at
any time and for any reason prior to the
award’s use by the designated
individual.
(b) Use of Award. Upon revocation,
the amount revoked will be deducted
from the designated individual’s
account and credited to the transferring
individual’s account. The transferring
individual may use the revoked
transferred education award for any of
the purposes described in § 2528.10,
consistent with the original time period
of availability set forth in § 2526.40(a).
(c) Re-transfer. Generally, an
individual may not re-transfer an award
to another individual after revoking the
same award from the original designated
individual. The Corporation may
approve re-transfer of an award for good
cause, including cases in which the
original designated individual was
unavoidably prevented from using the
award, as demonstrated by the
individual transferring the award.
§ 2530.85 What steps are necessary to
revoke an award?
(a) Request for revocation. Before
revoking an award from a designated
individual, the Corporation must
receive a request from the transferring
individual, including—
(1) The individual’s written
authorization to revoke the award;
(2) The year in which the award was
earned;
(3) The specific amount to be revoked;
and
(4) The identity of the designated
individual.
(b) Credit to transferring individual.
Upon receipt of a request including all
required information listed in paragraph
(a) of this section, the Corporation will
deduct the amount specified in the
transferring individual’s request from
the designated individual’s account and
credit the amount to the account of the
transferring individual, except as
provided in paragraph (c) of this
section. The Corporation will notify the
transferring individual the amount
revoked.
(c) Used awards. The Corporation will
only revoke that portion of the
transferred award that has not been used
by the designated individual. If the
designated individual has used the
entire transferred amount prior to the
date the Corporation receives the
revocation request, no amount will be
returned to the transferring individual.
An amount is considered to be used
when it is disbursed from the National
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
8030
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Service Trust, not when a request is
received to use an award.
(c) Notification to designated
individual. The Corporation will notify
the designated individual of the amount
being revoked as of the date of the
Corporation’s receipt of the revocation
request.
(d) Timing of revocation. The
Corporation must receive the request to
revoke the award from the transferring
individual prior to the award’s
expiration ten years from the date the
award was originally earned.
§ 2530.90 Is a designated individual
eligible for the payment of accrued interest
under part 2529?
No, an individual must have
successfully completed a term of service
in an approved AmeriCorps position or
Silver Scholar position to be eligible for
the payment of accrued interest under
Part 2529.
PART 2550—REQUIREMENTS AND
GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR STATE
COMMISSIONS AND ALTERNATIVE
ADMINISTRATIVE ENTITIES
34. The authority citation for Part
2550 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12638.
35. Amend § 2550.80 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 2550.80
[Amended]
*
*
*
*
(b) Selection of subtitle C programs
and preparation of application to the
Corporation. Each State must:
(1) Prepare an application to the
Corporation to receive funding or
education awards for national service
programs operating in and selected by
the State.
(2) Administer a competitive process
to select national service programs for
funding. The State is not required to
select programs for funding prior to
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:24 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
submission of the application described
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 2551—SENIOR COMPANION
PROGRAM
36. The authority citation for Part
2551 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.
12651b–12651d; E.O. 13331, 69 FR 9911.
37. Amend § 2551.92 by revising
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 2551.92
[Amended]
*
*
*
*
*
(e) How are Senior Companion cost
reimbursements budgeted? (1) Except as
provided in (e)(2) of this section, the
total of cost reimbursements for Senior
Companions, including stipends,
insurance, transportation, meals,
physical examinations, and recognition,
shall be a sum equal to at least 80
percent of the amount of the Federal
share of the grant award. Federal,
required non-Federal, and excess nonFederal resources can be used to make
up the amount allotted for cost
reimbursements.
(2) The Corporation may allow
exceptions to the 80 percent cost
reimbursement requirement in cases of
demonstrated need such as:
(i) Initial difficulties in the
development of local funding sources
during the first three years of
operations;
(ii) An economic downturn, the
occurrence of a natural disaster, or
similar events in the service area that
severely restrict or reduce sources of
local funding support; or
(iii) The unexpected discontinuation
of local support from one or more
sources that a project has relied on for
a period of years.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
PART 2552—FOSTER GRANDPARENT
PROGRAM
38. The authority citation for Part
2552 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4950 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.
12651b–12651d; E.O. 13331, 69 FR 9911.
39. Amend § 2552.92 by revising
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 2552.92 What are project funding
requirements?
*
*
*
*
*
(e) How are Foster Grandparent cost
reimbursements budgeted? (1) Except as
provided in (e)(2) of this section, the
total of cost reimbursements for Foster
Grandparents, including stipends,
insurance, transportation, meals,
physical examinations, and recognition,
shall be a sum equal to at least 80
percent of the amount of the Federal
share of the grant award. Federal,
required non-Federal, and excess nonFederal resources can be used to make
up the amount allotted for cost
reimbursements.
(2) The Corporation may allow
exceptions to the 80 percent cost
reimbursement requirement in cases of
demonstrated need such as:
(i) Initial difficulties in the
development of local funding sources
during the first three years of
operations; or
(ii) An economic downturn, the
occurrence of a natural disaster, or
similar events in the service area that
severely restrict or reduce sources of
local funding support; or
(iii) The unexpected discontinuation
of local support from one or more
sources that a project has relied on for
a period of years.
Dated: February 17, 2010.
Frank R. Trinity,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010–3385 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8013-8030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3385]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
45 CFR Parts 2510, 2522, 2525, 2526, 2527, 2528, 2529, 2530, 2531,
2532, 2533, 2550, 2551, and 2552
RIN 3045-AA51
Serve America Act Amendments to the National and Community
Service Act of 1990
AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On April 21, 2009, President Obama signed into law the Edward
M. Kennedy Serve America Act (``The Serve America Act'' or ``SAA'').
The Serve America Act reauthorizes and expands national service
programs administered by the Corporation for National and Community
Service (``the Corporation'') by amending the National and Community
Service Act of 1990 (``NCSA'' or ``the Act'') and the Domestic
Volunteer Service Act of 1973 (``DVSA''). The Corporation publishes
this proposed rule to implement changes to the operation of the
National Service Trust under the Serve America Act. This proposed rule
provides flexibility for exceptions to the 80 percent cost
reimbursement requirement for Senior Companion and Foster Grandparent
programs based on hardship. In addition, this proposed rule reorders
and renumbers certain parts of the existing regulations, adds new
definitions, and makes several minor technical edits.
DATES: To be sure your comments are considered, they must reach the
Corporation or or before April 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send your comments electronically through the
Federal government's one-stop rulemaking Web site at https://www.regulations.gov. You may also mail or deliver your comments to Amy
[[Page 8014]]
Borgstrom, Docket Manager, Corporation for National and Community
Service, 1201 New York Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20525. Members of the
public may review copies of all communications received on this
rulemaking at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Corporation's
Washington, DC headquarters.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Borgstrom, Docket Manager,
Corporation for National and Community Service, aborgstrom@cns.gov, TDD
606-3472. Persons with visual impairments may request this rule in an
alternate format.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments about these proposed regulations.
To ensure that your comments have maximum value in helping us develop
the final regulations, we urge you to identify clearly the specific
section or sections of the proposed regulations that each comment
addresses and to arrange your comments in the same order as the
proposed regulations. During and after the comment period, you may
inspect all public comments about these proposed regulations on https://www.regulations.gov or by contacting the Docket Manager listed in this
notice.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking
Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking record for these proposed regulations. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of aid, please contact Amy
Borgstrom, Docket Manager, Corporation for National and Community
Service, aborgstrom@cns.gov, TDD 606-3472.
II. Background
On April 21, 2009, President Obama signed into law the Edward M.
Kennedy Serve America Act (Serve America Act). The Serve America Act
reauthorizes and expands national service programs administered by the
Corporation by amending the NCSA and DVSA. The Corporation engages four
million Americans in service each year, including approximately 75,000
AmeriCorps members, 492,000 Senior Corps Volunteers, 1.1 million Learn
and Serve America students, and 2.2 million additional community
volunteers mobilized and managed through agency programs.
Section 6101 of the Serve America Act authorizes the Chief
Executive Officer of the Corporation to issue such regulations as may
be necessary to carry out the amendments required under the Act. To
fulfill that responsibility, on September 10, 2009, the Corporation
issued an interim final rule to implement time-sensitive changes to the
Corporation's AmeriCorps State and National, Senior Corps, and Learn
and Serve America program regulations. (74 FR 46495). The changes
resulting from the interim final rule were required as a result of
amendments to the NCSA and DVSA by the Serve America Act, which took
effect for most purposes on October 1, 2009.
In that rule, we stated our intention to engage in full notice and
comment rulemaking to implement those amendments mandated by the Serve
America Act that did not require immediate regulatory action. This rule
primarily proposes amendments and additions to existing regulations
regarding the National Service Trust, including limitations on
education award receipt, the available uses of education awards,
eligibility to receive an education award, eligibility to transfer an
education award, and the amount of an education award. This proposed
rule also addresses the limitation on the number of terms an individual
may serve in an AmeriCorps State and National program. The proposed
rule allows flexibility in managing match requirements for Senior
Companion and Foster Grandparent programs facing hardship. Finally,
this rule makes several technical corrections inadvertently omitted
from the interim final rule, including an amendment to the provision on
pre-approval of Subtitle C formula programs, amendments to the
AmeriCorps State and National selection criteria, and an amendment to
include a reference to the Department of Education's new Public Service
Loan Forgiveness Program. An overview of specific changes for each
program is set out below.
III. Proposed Rule
Definitions (Sec. Sec. 2510.20, 2525.20)
The National Service Trust is an account in the U.S. Treasury
authorized to disburse education awards to national service
participants. Prior to passage of the Serve America Act, the
Corporation was authorized to disburse one type of education award from
the National Service Trust--a national service education award, also
known as a Segal AmeriCorps education award, available upon successful
completion of a term of service in an approved AmeriCorps position. An
``approved AmeriCorps position'' is one of the positions described in
Sec. 123 of the Act, including a position in AmeriCorps State and
National, AmeriCorps NCCC, AmeriCorps VISTA, and the newly authorized
ServeAmerica Fellowship program.
The Serve America Act authorizes two new types of education awards:
(1) A Silver Scholar education award of $1,000, available upon
successful completion of a term of service in an approved Silver
Scholar position; and (2) a Summer of Service education award of
between $500 and $750, available upon successful completion of a term
of service in an approved Summer of Service position. To align with the
amended statute, this proposed rule amends Sec. 2525.20 by adding
three separate definitions for ``AmeriCorps education award,'' ``Silver
Scholar education award,'' and ``Summer of Service education award.''
Each of these awards is based upon successful completion of a term
of service in an approved position. For a position of any type to be
considered ``approved,'' the Corporation must have agreed to provide a
corresponding education award upon successful completion of a term of
service in that position. This proposed rule amends Sec. 2510.20 by
adding definitions to clarify that in order for a Summer of Service or
Silver Scholar position to be considered approved, it must be approved
by the Corporation for the receipt of a Silver Scholar or Summer of
Service education award, respectively.
There are different service requirements for each type of education
award. A term of service in an approved AmeriCorps position is for at
least 1,700 hours during a period of not more than one year, with
options for part-time or reduced part-time terms of service, as defined
in Sec. 2522.220, for AmeriCorps State and National members. A term of
service in an approved Silver Scholar position must be for at least 350
hours during a period of one year. A term of service in an approved
Summer of Service position must be for at least 100 hours ``during the
summer months.'' To clarify that what constitutes a term of service
will vary depending upon the program, this proposed rule amends the
definition of ``term of service'' in Sec. 2525.20 to align with the
NCSA by providing separate descriptions for terms of service in
approved AmeriCorps, Silver Scholar, and Summer of Service positions.
[[Page 8015]]
As stated above, a Summer of Service education award will generally
be $500. However, the NCSA authorizes the Corporation to establish a
Summer of Service award of $750 for ``economically disadvantaged
youth.'' The Corporation proposes in this rule to define ``economically
disadvantaged youth'' for the purposes of the larger Summer of Service
education award as a child who is eligible for a free lunch and
breakfast under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act. This
proposed rule amends Sec. 2525.20 to add this definition.
Eligibility To Receive an Education Award (Sec. 2526.10)
The Serve America Act created two new types of education awards:
Silver Scholar education awards and Summer of Service education awards,
for $1000 and $500 respectively, available upon successful completion
of an approved Silver Scholar or Summer of Service position. This
proposed rule amends Sec. 2526.10 to include individuals who
successfully complete terms of service in approved Silver Scholar or
Summer of positions as eligible to receive an education award from the
National Service Trust.
Previously, the list of eligibility criteria to receive an
education award in Sec. 2526.10 has reflected the eligibility criteria
to serve in AmeriCorps State and National, AmeriCorps NCCC, and
AmeriCorps VISTA, including age and education criteria that would
necessarily exclude individuals in Summer of Service positions, which
are available for ``youth who will be enrolled in any of grades 6
through 12 at the end of the summer'' (42 U.S.C. 12563(c)(8)). To align
with the amended statute, this proposed rule amends Sec. 2526.10 to
defer to the eligibility criteria of individual programs for program-
specific criteria.
Under the proposed rule, for an individual to be eligible to
receive an education award, the organization responsible for the
individual's supervision must certify: (1) That the individual met the
applicable eligibility requirements for the approved national service
position, approved Silver Scholar position, or approved Summer of
Service position, as appropriate; (2) that the individual successfully
completed the term of service in the AmeriCorps, Silver Scholar, or
Summer of Service program; and (3) that the individual is a citizen,
national, or lawful permanent resident alien of the United States.
Successful Completion of a Term of Service (Sec. 2526.15)
Sec. 146 of the NCSA directs the Corporation to determine a process
by which an organization responsible for the supervision of a national
service participant may determine whether the participant successfully
completed a term of service. This proposed rule adds a new Sec.
2526.15 specifying the process for determining whether an individual
successfully completed a term of service for the purposes of receiving
an education award from the National Service Trust. Under this rule,
organizations supervising AmeriCorps State and National participants
would continue to use the existing process detailed at Sec.
2522.220(d). For all other programs, the organization would be required
to conduct an end-of-term evaluation for each participant to determine
whether: (1) The individual completed the required number of service
hours for the respective term of service; (2) the individual performed
satisfactorily on assignments, tasks, or projects; and (3) the
individual met any other performance criteria as communicated to the
member by the organization. What is considered ``satisfactory
performance'' is within the discretion of the program. While the
Corporation encourages programs to keep records of end-of-term
evaluations of member performance for their own purposes, for the
purpose of this requirement certification that an individual did or did
not successfully complete a term of service will be deemed to
incorporate an end-of-term evaluation. A certification will not,
however, suffice as documentation of hours served.
Release for Compelling Personal Circumstances (Sec. Sec. 2526.20-25)
Sec. 147 of the NCSA authorizes the Corporation to make education
awards in five different amount categories: (1) An amount for
successful completion of a full-time approved national service
position; (2) an amount for successful completion of a part-time
approved national service position; (3) an amount for partial
completion of service, available upon release for compelling personal
circumstances from an approved national service position; (4) an amount
for a Silver Scholar education award for successful completion of an
approved Silver Scholar position; and (5) an amount for a Summer of
Service education award for successful completion of an approved Summer
of Service position. Partial awards are described only in the context
of release for compelling personal circumstances from an approved
national service position. In describing types of service positions in
Sec. 146, the Act distinguishes between approved national service
positions (which are described in Sec. 123 to include AmeriCorps State
and National, AmeriCorps VISTA, AmeriCorps NCCC, and ServeAmerica
Fellows), approved Silver Scholar positions, and approved Summer of
Service positions, and does not provide for a pro-rated award for a
release for compelling personal circumstances from an approved Silver
Scholar or Summer of Service position. In summary, there is no
authority for a partial award for a release for compelling personal
circumstances from a Silver Scholar or Summer of Service position.
This proposed rule amends Sec. 2526.20 and adds a new Sec.
2526.25 to clarify that partial awards will not be available for
individuals who are released early from Silver Scholar or Summer of
Service positions, even for compelling reasons.
This proposed rule also amends Sec. 2526.20 to reflect the
statutory requirement that an individual must have performed
satisfactorily prior to being released for compelling personal
circumstances in order to receive a partial education award.
Limitation on Amount of Award Disbursed to Institution of Higher
Education (Sec. Sec. 2528.30-40)
Prior to the effective date of the Serve America Act, under Sec.
148(c)(6) of the NCSA, the Corporation's disbursement from an
individual's education award for any period of enrollment at an
institution of higher education could not exceed the difference between
that individual's cost of attendance for that period of enrollment and
the sum of (1) the individual's estimated financial assistance for that
period under part A of title IV of the Higher Education Act and (2) the
individual's veterans' benefits as defined under section 480(c) of the
Higher Education Act. The Serve America Act amended Sec. 148(c)(6) to
no longer consider an individual's veterans' benefits in this manner.
This proposed rule amends Sec. Sec. 2528.30 and 40 to align with
amended Sec. 148(c)(6) by removing any consideration of an individual's
veterans' benefits when determining the maximum amount of the
individual's education award that may be disbursed to an institution of
higher education.
Use of Education Award for a Program of Education Approved by the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Sec. Sec. 2528.10, 60-80)
The Serve America Act amended Sec. 148 of the NCSA to add a fifth
available
[[Page 8016]]
use for an education award. Under the amended law, the education award
is available ``to pay expenses incurred in enrolling in an educational
institution or training establishment that is approved under chapter 36
of title 38, United States Code, or other applicable provisions of law,
for offering programs of education, apprenticeship, or on-job training
for which educational assistance may be provided by the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs.'' (42 U.S.C. 12604(a)(4)). This proposed rule amends
Sec. 2528.10 to add this use to the list of available uses, and adds
rules on the process for using the award for this purpose. Benefits
offered under chapter 36 of title 38, U.S.C., were authorized under the
Montgomery G.I. Bill and the Post 9/11 G.I. Bill, and will be referred
to hereinafter as ``G.I. Bill education benefits.'' Likewise, courses
and programs approved under that chapter will be referred to as ``G.I.-
approved.''
This proposed rule would require that the institution or training
establishment at which an individual requests to use an education award
certify under penalty of law that the amount requested would be used to
pay all or part of the individual's expenses attributable to a course,
program of education, apprenticeship, or job training program offered
by that institution or training establishment, and certify under
penalty of law that the course or program for which the individual is
requesting to use the education award has been and is currently
approved by the State approving agency for the State where the
institution or establishment is located, or by the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs. The Department of Veterans Affairs is the agency
responsible for approving courses or programs of education under
chapter 36 of title 38, U.S. Code, and the Corporation defers to the
decisions made by the State approving agencies and the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs regarding approving--or withdrawing approval--of a
program of education; if an institution or establishment cannot verify
that a course or program of education has received the requisite
approval, the Corporation will not disburse the funds to the school.
Unlike G.I. education benefits, which may be disbursed directly to
an individual, under this proposed rule, the education award would be
disbursed directly to the educational institution or training
establishment.
If an individual for whom the Corporation has disbursed an
education award withdraws or fails to complete the period of enrollment
at an educational institution or training establishment in a program of
education approved by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, this proposed
rule would require the educational institution or training
establishment to provide a pro-rated refund to the Corporation.
Payment of Accrued Interest (2529.10)
This proposed rule amends Sec. 2529.10, which currently provides
for interest forbearance to individuals serving in approved AmeriCorps
positions, to clarify that individuals who successfully complete terms
of service in approved Silver Scholar positions may also be eligible
for payments of interest accrued on qualified student loans while
serving. The proposed rule does not include Summer of Service
positions, as Summer of Service positions are reserved for rising 6th
through 12th graders who, having not yet enrolled in an institution of
higher education, will not yet have incurred qualified students loans.
The Serve America Act also amended Sec. 123 by expanding the list
of positions considered to be approved national service positions to
include ``a position involving service in the ServeAmerica Fellowship
program.'' The term ``approved national service position'' is used
interchangeably with the term ``approved AmeriCorps position.'' Thus,
although this proposed rule does not explicitly amend Sec. 2529.10 to
include ServeAmerica Fellows, they are incorporated by definition.
Amount of AmeriCorps Education Award (Sec. 2527.10)
Upon successful completion of a term of service in an approved
AmeriCorps position, including positions in AmeriCorps State and
National, AmeriCorps VISTA, AmeriCorps NCCC, and Serve America Fellows,
an individual is eligible to receive an AmeriCorps education award from
the National Service Trust. Prior to the passage of the Serve America
Act, the amount of a full-time AmeriCorps education award was set in
law at $4,725.
The Serve America Act amended Sec. 147 of the NCSA by changing the
amount of a full-time national service education award to be ``equal to
the maximum amount of a Federal Pell Grant under section 401 of the
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1071a) that a student eligible
for such Grant may receive in the aggregate * * * for the year for
which the national service position is approved by the Corporation.''
This proposed rule amends Sec. 2527.10 to conform to the changes in
the NCSA in the amount of the full-time award.
The amount of the Pell Grant upon which AmeriCorps education awards
will be based may change each year, thus, the amount of an AmeriCorps
education award may also change annually. To determine the amount of an
AmeriCorps education award, the Corporation will use the amount of the
Pell Grant as of October 1 (the first day of the Federal fiscal year)
in the fiscal year in which the national service position is approved.
For example, if a national service position is approved in September of
2010, the amount of the education award will be based on a full-time
amount of $5,350--the amount of the Pell Grant as of October 1, 2009
(the first day of fiscal year 2010).
The trigger date for determining the amount of an education award
for a particular national service position is the date that position is
approved--not the date the individual begins serving in a national
service position. Not all positions that begin in a fiscal year will
receive an education award based on the amount of the Pell Grant in
that fiscal year.
In accordance with the national service laws, funding for education
awards are obligated on a different schedule for AmeriCorps VISTA,
AmeriCorps NCCC, and AmeriCorps State and National. What follows is a
detailed discussion on how the approval date for a national service
position is determined for the purposes of establishing the amount of
an education award.
For AmeriCorps VISTA, a position is considered to be approved at
the time the Corporation enters into an enforceable agreement with an
individual, signified by the individual's taking the VISTA oath of
service. (42 U.S.C. 4954(c)). For an AmeriCorps VISTA position, the
education award amount is equal to the amount of a Pell Grant on
October 1 of the fiscal year in which the VISTA takes the oath of
service. For example, a VISTA who takes the oath on any date between
October 1, 2009, and September 30, 2010, is eligible for a full-time
award amount of $5,350--the amount of the Pell Grant as of October 1,
2009.
For AmeriCorps NCCC, a position is considered to be approved at the
time the Corporation enters into an enforceable agreement with an
individual, signified by the individual's signing of an AmeriCorps NCCC
member agreement. For an AmeriCorps NCCC position, the education award
amount will be equal to the amount of a Pell Grant on October 1 of the
fiscal year in which the AmeriCorps NCCC member signs the member
agreement. Therefore, an individual who signs an
[[Page 8017]]
AmeriCorps NCCC member agreement on any date between October 1, 2009,
and September 10, 2010, will receive an award based on a full-time
award amount of $5,350--the amount of the Pell Grant as of October 1,
2009.
For AmeriCorps State and National, by law, a position is considered
to be approved at the time the Corporation executes a grant used to
support the AmeriCorps member--not the date an AmeriCorps member takes
an oath, signs an agreement, or begins service. As discussed above, the
day an individual enters service in AmeriCorps NCCC or AmeriCorps VISTA
may make a significant difference in the amount of the education award,
as the award for a position will likely be larger if the individual
takes an oath of office or signs an agreement on October 1, as opposed
to September 30. The same will not be true for AmeriCorps State and
National members. AmeriCorps State and National grants are generally
made during the Spring and Summer, i.e., in the latter half of a fiscal
year. As a result, unlike AmeriCorps NCCC and AmeriCorps VISTA members
who are eligible for the new amount of the award as of October 1, the
earliest point at which an AmeriCorps member may begin serving in a
position funded by those grants may be closer to the end of a fiscal
year.
As an example, if an AmeriCorps State program receives a grant on
August 1, 2010, and enrolls a member using fiscal year 2010 grant funds
on August 3, 2010, that member will receive an education award based on
a full-time amount of $5,350--the amount of the Pell Grant on October
1, 2009, the first day of the fiscal year in which the August 2010
grant was made. If the program then enrolls another member on October
10, 2010, that member will also receive an education award based on the
$5,350 amount--even though at that point a new fiscal year has begun,
and the Pell Grant for fiscal year 2011 may have increased as of
October 1, 2010. The determining factor is that the member position was
approved by the Corporation in fiscal year 2010.
Further, unlike an AmeriCorps NCCC or AmeriCorps VISTA member,
whose approval date will closely correlate with the day the individual
begins service, it is possible for an AmeriCorps State and National
member beginning service in one fiscal year to be supported with funds
from a grant made in a prior fiscal year. Therefore, it is possible for
two AmeriCorps members starting service on the same day to be supported
by two different grant awards made in two different fiscal years,
resulting in two different approval dates and two different education
award amounts.
For example, a program might receive a continuation grant on August
1, 2011, but still have grant funds carried over from a grant made in
2010. If the program enrolls two members on August 1, 2011--one
supported with the 2010 grant and one supported with the 2011 grant--
the one supported with the 2010 grant will be eligible for an award
based on a full-time award of $5,350--the amount of the Pell Grant on
October 1, 2009, the first day of the fiscal year in which the 2010
grant was made. The member who is being supported with 2011 funds will
be eligible for an award based on whatever the amount of the Pell Grant
is on October 1, 2010.
The Corporation recognizes the possibility for confusion among
AmeriCorps State and National members, who, unlike AmeriCorps NCCC and
AmeriCorps VISTA members, will not be able to rely on their service
start dates to figure out the amount of the award they are eligible to
receive. To reduce confusion, it is essential for AmeriCorps programs--
particularly those with AmeriCorps State and National members--to
clearly communicate to each member, prior to the commencement of
service, the amount of the education award the individual will receive
upon successful completion of the term of service. Beginning with
grants made in 2010, AmeriCorps State and National grant provisions
will direct grantees to specify the amount of the education award of
the funds being used to support the position in the member service
agreement.
It is important to remember that the Serve America Act went into
effect on October 1, 2009. All positions approved prior to that date
are eligible for awards based on a full-time amount of $4,725. This
includes all AmeriCorps State and National positions, even those that
began after October 1, 2009, since no AmeriCorps State and National
positions have been approved with fiscal year 2010 funds to date.
To learn more about the amount of the education award and how it is
determined, visit the AmeriCorps Web site at https://www.americorps.gov/for_individuals/benefits/benefits_ed_award.asp.
Amount of Silver Scholar and Summer of Service Education Awards (Sec.
2527.10)
As previously discussed, the Serve America Act created two new
types of education awards: Silver Scholar education awards and Summer
of Service education awards. This proposed rule amends Sec. 2527.10 to
include the Silver Scholar education award of $1000, available upon
successful completion of a term of service of at least 350 hours in a
Silver Scholar position.
This proposed rule also amends Sec. 2527.10 to include the Summer
of Service education award of $500, available upon successful
completion of at least 100 hours in a Summer of Service position. The
Corporation may authorize a Summer of Service education award of $750
if the participant is economically disadvantaged. In order to authorize
the increased award, the Corporation must receive a certification from
the school with which the participant served that the participant meets
the definition of ``economically disadvantaged,'' defined in this rule
as a child that is eligible for a free lunch and breakfast under the
Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(b)).
Pro-rated education awards for an early release for compelling
personal circumstances from a Silver Scholar or Summer of Service
position are not available. If an individual fails to complete either
type of term for any reason, the individual will not receive any award.
And unlike the AmeriCorps education award described in the previous
section, Silver Scholar and Summer of Service education awards will not
vary in amount from one year to the next.
Limitation on Value of Education Awards Received (Sec. Sec. 2526.50-
55)
Prior to the passage of the Serve America Act, the national service
laws limited individuals to receiving an education award ``only on the
basis of the first and second * * * terms of service.'' A term of
service includes full-time, part-time, or less-than-part-time terms,
terms in which the person served at least 15 percent of the term of
service, and terms for which an individual was released for misconduct
regardless of the amount of time served. Terms range in service hour
requirements from 300 hours to more than 1,700 hours, but despite the
contrast in the level of commitment required or the service opportunity
presented, all terms were previously considered of equal value for the
purposes of limiting the receipt of education awards.
The Serve America Act amended the national service laws to no
longer limit the receipt of education awards based upon the number of
terms served, but rather place the limit on the value of education
awards received. Sec. 146(c) now states: ``An individual may not
receive, through national service educational awards and silver scholar
[[Page 8018]]
educational awards, more than an amount equal to the aggregate value of
[two] such awards for full-time service.''
The amended law allows for an individual to earn more than two
education awards, so long as the aggregate value of all awards received
does not exceed the aggregate value of two full-time national service
education awards. Significantly, the law does not create an entitlement
to receive the aggregate value of two full-time awards; rather, it
prohibits an individual from receiving more than the aggregate value of
two full-time awards. This proposed rule amends Sec. 2526.50 to align
with the amended statutory language.
As previously discussed, the amount of a full-time education award
is now tied to the amount of a Pell Grant in the year the position is
awarded, and is likely to change each year. The Corporation does not
interpret the amended statute to suggest that the value of two full-
time education awards for the purposes of this section is equal to the
dollar amount of two full-time awards and would thus similarly change
on an annual basis, providing a potentially unlimited number of service
opportunities and education awards. Nor does the Corporation interpret
this change as a means of ensuring that all national service
participants receive an identical amount of money. Rather, the
Corporation interprets the change in focus from the number of terms
served to the value of education awards received as a means of
addressing the inequity of limiting individuals to two terms of service
when not all terms offer an equivalent service opportunity. In other
words, for the purposes of the limitation on education award receipt,
value is distinct from amount.
The Corporation considers an education award to be the counterpart
to successful completion of a term of service, and while the amount of
that award might change, the service opportunity offered by a
particular term of service is constant. The Corporation interprets the
``value'' of a full-time education award to be representative of the
service opportunity upon which it is based, therefore, a limitation of
two full-time education awards can be understood as a limitation of two
full-time service opportunities.
In order to attribute a value to an award received on the basis of
a static service opportunity in an environment in which the award
amount may fluctuate annually, the Corporation proposes to measure the
value of any award amount relative to the amount of a full-time award
in a given year. In this rule, the Corporation proposes, for the
purposes of this section, that the value of an education award is equal
to the actual amount of the education award received divided by the
amount of a full-time education award in the year the AmeriCorps or
Silver Scholar position upon which the award is based was approved.
Using this calculation, every award received will be considered to have
a value between 0 and 1. Although the amount of a full-time award may
change, the value of a full-time award will always be equal to 1.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23FE10.000
For example, an individual who completed a part-time position
approved in 2009 received an education award of $2362.50. The value of
this award is the amount received, $2,362.50, divided by $4,725, the
amount of a full-time award in the year the position was approved, or
.5. Another individual completes a part-time position approved in 2010
and receives an education award of $2,675. The value of this award is
the amount received, $2,675, divided by $5,350, the amount of a full-
time award in the year the position was approved, or .5. Using this
calculation, the value of an award received for part-time service will
always be equal to .5.
If an individual leaves a term of service for compelling personal
circumstances and receives a pro-rated award, the value attributed to
that award will be based on the amount actually received. For example,
an individual was released for compelling personal circumstances from a
full-time position approved in 2009 after serving 800 hours, and
received a pro-rated award of $2,223.52. The value of this award is the
amount of the award received, $2,223.52, divided by, $4,725, the amount
of a full-time award in the year the position was approved, or .47.
Another individual was released for compelling personal circumstances
from a full-time position approved in 2010 after serving 800 hours, and
received a pro-rated award of $2,517.64. The value of this award is the
amount of the award received, $2,517.64, divided by, $5,350, the amount
of a full-time award in the year the position was approved, or .47.
If an individual exits a term for cause and does not receive an
education award, the amount received will be $0, and therefore no value
will be attributed to the individual for purposes of this section.
However, an exit for cause will have an impact on the individual's
eligibility to serve subsequent terms of service. A term exited for
cause is considered a term of service for the purposes of term
limitations for individual programs. For example, if an individual has
already served one term of service in AmeriCorps NCCC, and exits a
second term in AmeriCorps NCCC for cause, the individual has exhausted
the two terms of service one may serve in AmeriCorps NCCC.
Additionally, if an individual is released for cause from an approved
AmeriCorps position (including positions in AmeriCorps State and
National, AmeriCorps VISTA, AmeriCorps NCCC, and Serve America
Fellows), and the program determines in the end-of-term evaluation that
the individual served unsatisfactorily, the individual may not be
permitted to serve a subsequent term in an approved AmeriCorps
position.
For the purpose of transferred awards (discussed further in the
section in this preamble on transfer), this rule proposes that the
value of the award received by a transferee will be the actual amount
of the award received divided by the amount of a full-time award in the
year the position for which the transferring individual received the
award was approved. For example, if an individual receives an education
award based on a term of service approved in 2010, and later transfers
$1,000 of that award to a grandchild, the grandchild will be considered
to have received an award value of .19, the result of dividing the
amount received, $1,000, by the amount of a full-time award in 2010,
$5,350. If the transferring individual revokes all or part of an award,
this rule proposes that the value considered to be received by the
designated individual will be decreased accordingly. An individual who
receives the aggregate value of two full-time awards through
transferred awards will not be eligible to enroll in a term of service
the successful completion of which would result in the receipt of an
education award.
[[Page 8019]]
Under the proposed rule, an award is considered to be received at
the time it becomes available for an individual's use, and the fact
that an individual does not use an award does not diminish its value
for the purposes of this section. In addition, under the proposed rule
an individual who transfers an award will still be considered to have
received the award, and the value of the award for the purposes of this
section will not be decreased by the amount the individual transfers to
a designated individual. For example, if an individual successfully
completes two full-time terms of service, and the individual then
transfers both full-time awards to a child, both the child and the
transferring individual will be considered to have received two full-
time awards.
The proposed rule states that an individual may receive no more
than the aggregate value of two full-time education awards. In this
rule, the Corporation proposes that the aggregate value of awards
received will be equal to the sum of the value of each national service
education award received (awards received from terms of service in
AmeriCorps State and National, AmeriCorps VISTA, AmeriCorps NCCC, or
ServeAmerica fellowships), including partial awards, the value of each
Silver Scholar award received, and the value of each transferred award
received. The calculation of the aggregate value does not include
Summer of Service education awards, as these are explicitly excluded by
law.
For example, an individual served a full-time term in 2008 and
received an award of $4,725. The same individual served a part-time
term in 2009 and received an award of $2,362.50. The individual enrolls
in a minimum-time term in 2010 and receives an award of $1,132.60. The
value of the first award is 1 ($4,725 divided by $4,725), the value of
the second award is .5 ($2,362.50 divided by $4,725), and the value of
the third award is .21 ($1,132.60 divided by $5,350). The aggregate
value of awards received is 1.71 (1 + .5 + .21).
While the amended law separates the previously indivisible
limitations on number of terms served and education awards received,
the limitation on education awards an individual is eligible to receive
may impact an individual's eligibility to enroll in a subsequent term
of service. The proposed rule states that an individual may not enroll
in a subsequent term of service if successful completion of that term
of service would result in receipt of an education award the value of
which, when added to the aggregate value of awards previously received,
would be greater than 2. This limitation would not, however, prevent an
individual from enrolling in a term of service for which the individual
chooses to waive receipt of an education award, including a VISTA term
of service for which the individual elects to receive an end-of-service
stipend.
Using the example above, if an individual had received an aggregate
value of 1.71 awards in the past, that individual may be eligible to
enroll in a quarter-time, minimum-time, reduced part-time, or Silver
Scholar position, but would not be eligible to enroll in a part-time or
full-time position, since the value of a part-time award, .5, plus
1.71, is greater than 2.
The Corporation has received questions regarding whether an
individual could enroll in a term of service, and exit for compelling
personal circumstances in order to receive a pro-rated award that, when
added to other awards received, would not exceed the aggregate value of
two full-time education awards. Exiting in order to receive an
education award of a particular amount would not be considered to be a
compelling personal circumstance. The proposed rule is based upon the
assumption that every individual who enrolls in a term of service does
so with the intention of successfully completing that term. Therefore,
an individual would not be permitted to enroll in a term with the
intention of leaving early in order to receive a pro-rated award of a
lesser value.
The Corporation has received questions about whether awards
received prior to the effective date of the Serve America Act will be
included in determining the value of education awards received. The
national service laws, as amended by the Serve America Act, do not
differentiate between awards received prior to the effective date. All
awards earned in the past will have a value attributed to them for the
purposes of this section. Thus, under the proposed rule, if an
individual has received two full-time education awards in the past,
that individual is not eligible to receive another education award, and
may not enroll in a term of service that will result in the receipt of
an education award.
Separate from the limitation on education award receipt, individual
Corporation programs--AmeriCorps NCCC, AmeriCorps VISTA, and AmeriCorps
State & National--have their own term limitations. Each full-time term,
part-time term, and term for which the individual leaves after serving
15% or for misconduct is considered one term for the purposes of these
program-specific term limitations. Thus, if an individual serves two
terms of service in AmeriCorps NCCC and exits from one for compelling
personal circumstances, that individual may be able to enroll in a
minimum time AmeriCorps State and National or AmeriCorps VISTA
position, but will not be able to enroll in another AmeriCorps NCCC
term because the individual has already met the term limit for that
program. Because the limit on the value of education awards an
individual may receive necessarily will limit the number of terms an
individual will be able to serve across the Corporation's AmeriCorps
and Silver Scholar programs, the Corporation does not intend to set an
overall limit for number of terms across programs at this time.
Transfer of Education Awards (Part 2530)
The Serve America Act amended Subtitle D of title I of the NCSA to
authorize individuals to transfer an education award, with limitations
on who can transfer an award, and who can receive a transferred award.
By statute, to transfer an award, an individual must: (1) Have
successfully completed a term of service in an approved AmeriCorps
State and National or Silver Scholar position; and (2) have been age 55
or older before beginning that term of service. To receive an award, an
individual must: (1) Be designated by a qualifying transferring
individual; (2) be the child, grandchild, or foster child of the
transferring individual; and (3) be a citizen, national, or lawful
permanent resident alien of the United States. The effective date of
this provision was October 1, 2009; only individuals beginning service
on or after that date will be eligible to transfer an education award.
Sec. 148(f) specifies that the ``designated individual,'' meaning
the child, grandchild, or foster child designated by the transferring
individual to receive the award, may use the award for the purposes
described in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of that section--i.e., to
repay qualified student loans, to pay for current educational expenses
at an institution of higher education, or to pay expenses incurred in
an approved school-to-work program. The school-to-work program,
authorized under the School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994,
sunsetted in 2001, thus, in practice, the designated individual would
be able to use the award only for current educational expenses or to
repay qualified student loans. The NCSA does not extend the
[[Page 8020]]
use of the award to pay expenses incurred in enrolling in an
institution or training establishment approved under the G.I. Bill to
designated individuals, nor does it permit designated individuals to
receive interest forbearance payments as described in Sec. 148(e).
This section of the NCSA also permits a transferring individual to,
``on any date on which a portion of the education award remains unused,
modify or revoke the transfer of the educational award with respect to
that portion.''
This proposed rule adds a new Part 2530 on transfer, including
rules reflecting statutory guidelines, and details on the processes for
requesting both transfers and revocations of transferred awards. The
NCSA also includes a provision requiring the Corporation to ``establish
requirements to prevent waste, fraud, or abuse in connection with the
transfer of an educational award and to protect the integrity of the
educational award under this subsection.'' This proposed rule includes
several measures intended to protect a transferred education award from
waste, fraud, or abuse.
First, as part of the process for the transferring individual to
request the transfer and the process for the designated individual to
accept the transfer, the proposed rule would require both the
transferring individual and the designated individual to provide a
certification under penalty of law that each meets the criteria to
transfer, or receive, a transferred award. As with all certifications,
an individual may be asked to produce verifying documentation.
Second, the proposed rule would limit an individual to making a
single transfer of an education award that is attributable to a single
term of service, thereby limiting the opportunity for waste, fraud, or
abuse. In order to transfer awards to more than one designated
individual, the transferring individual will need to earn awards for
more than one term of service. Under no circumstance may an individual
partition a single award attributable to completion of a single term of
service to multiple designated individuals. Notably, this proposed rule
would permit an individual to transfer all or a portion of an award to
a designated individual, thus, the transferring individual could keep a
portion of the award for his or her use, and transfer a portion of the
award to a designated individual.
As stated above, a transferring individual also has the authority
to revoke any unused portion of an education award from a designated
individual. As another measure to prevent waste, fraud, or abuse, and
in line with the Corporation's intent to limit individuals to a single
transfer from each award, a transferring individual would not, as a
general rule, be permitted to re-transfer a revoked award to another
individual.
The proposed rule includes an exception to this general rule for
those situations in which the Corporation considers the award to have
been revoked for good cause, as demonstrated by the transferring
individual. For example, if a transferring individual revokes the full
amount transferred upon the death of a designated individual, the
Corporation would permit the transferring individual to re-transfer the
award in whole or in part.
This proposed rule also includes several clarifying provisions. As
discussed in the section in this rule on the limitation on the value of
education awards an individual may receive, the NCSA prohibits an
individual from receiving more than the aggregate value of two
education awards. Under this proposed rule, an award would be
considered to be ``received'' at the time it becomes available for an
individual's use. The fact that an individual transfers an award to a
designated individual would not decrease the value of awards the
individual would be considered to have received. Transferred awards a
designated individual receives would also be considered when
calculating the aggregate value of awards received.
For example, if an individual receives two full-time awards, and
transfers both awards to a child, both the transferring and designated
individual will be considered to have received the aggregate value of
two full-time awards, and neither will be eligible to receive
additional AmeriCorps or Silver Scholar awards from the National
Service Trust. Notably, because Summer of Service education awards are
not included in the calculation of aggregate value of education awards
received, a designated individual could still receive Summer of Service
education awards even if the designated individual had already received
the aggregate value of two full-time education awards. As discussed in
the section on calculating the value of an education award, a
transferred award would have a value based on the amount of a full-time
education award in the year the position on which the transferring
individual's award was based was approved.
Finally, under the national service laws, an individual has seven
years from the date the individual completes a term of service upon
which an award is based to use an award, and a designated individual
receiving a transferred award has ten years from the date the term of
service is completed to use the award. For example, if an individual
receives an award for a term completed in 2010, and transfers the award
five years after receiving the award, the designated individual would
have five years to use the award. In accordance with these statutory
time frames, the proposed rule permits an individual to revoke an award
at any point prior to its use, but the individual may only use a
revoked award for his or her use if the award has not expired. For
example, if an individual received an award for a term completed in
2010, transferred the award five years after receiving the award, and
then revoked the unused portion six years after receiving the award,
the transferring individual would have only one year to use the award.
If, however, the transferring individual had revoked the award eight
years after it was originally earned, the award would expire
immediately upon revocation, because although the award had not yet
expired for use by the designated individual, it would have expired for
the transferring individual a year earlier.
Periods of Availability for Silver Scholar, Summer of Service, and
Transferred Education Awards (Sec. 2526.40)
Under Sec. 146 of the NCSA, the period of availability for a Silver
Scholar education award is seven years from the date the individual
completes a term of service. The period of availability for a Summer of
Service education award is ten years from the date the individual
completes the term of service. Individuals who receive a transferred
award may use the award within ten years of the date the transferring
individual completes the term of service that is the basis for the
award--not the date the designated individual receives the transferred
award. For example, if an individual transfers an award five years
after the date the individual completed the term of service, the
designated individual would have five years to use the award--ten years
from the date the transferring individual completed the term of
service. This proposed rule amends section Sec. 2526.40 to include
periods of availability for Silver Scholar, Summer of Service, and
transferred education awards.
Similar to national service education awards, Sec. 146 authorizes
the Corporation to grant an extension to the period of availability for
a Silver Scholar education award, a Summer of Service education award,
or a
[[Page 8021]]
transferred award if the individual requesting the extension ``was
unavoidably prevented'' from using the education award or if the
individual ``performed another term of service in an approved national
service position, approved summer of service position, or approved
silver scholar position during that period.''
The ten year period of availability for transferred education
awards has raised questions about whether extensions will be granted if
a designated individual is still too young to use an award by its
expiration date. The NCSA does not specify a minimum age for the
designated individual. Thus, if an individual transfers an award to a
grandchild who was four years old at the time the individual completed
the term of service that was the basis of the award, the ten year
period of availability will expire when the child is fourteen. It is
unlikely that, at that time, the child would have had an opportunity to
use the education award, thus, the award would expire unused.
Sec. 148(f) of the NCSA directs the Corporation to ``establish
requirements to prevent waste, fraud, or abuse in connection with the
transfer of an educational award and to protect the integrity of the
educational award.'' To permit extensions for a designated individual
who is too young to use an award would mean, in some cases, extensions
for up to nine years beyond the original expiration date--nearly twice
the statutory period of availability. The longer the period of
availability, the greater the risk of fraud, waste, or abuse. Further,
Congress selected ten years as a reasonable period of availability for
a transferred award. Based upon these considerations, this proposed
rule specifies that an individual who is unable to use an education
award as a result of being too young will not be considered to be
unavoidably prevented from using the education award. Individuals
wishing to transfer an award will be reminded at the time they request
a transfer that while there is no minimum age for a designated
individual, extensions based on age will not be granted.
Certifications of Successful Completion of Terms of Service (Sec.
2626.10)
The Serve America Act amended the NCSA by adding a new section
146A, which imposes a requirement that a national service program
certify under penalty of law that an individual successfully completed
an agreed-upon term of service to be eligible to receive an education
award from the National Service Trust. Specifically Sec. 146A(a)
provides that, in making disbursements from the National Service Trust,
the Corporation is authorized to act on the basis of certifications
that individuals who served in approved AmeriCorps positions, approved
Summer of Service positions, or approved Silver Scholar positions,
successfully completed the term of service required to be eligible for
an education award. These certifications must be made by the entity
which selected the individual to serve in the position, and supervised
the individual's performance of their service. This proposed rule
implements Sec. 146A(a) by including the certification requirement in
the determination of who is eligible to receive an education award
under Sec. 2526.10(a)(2)(A), (C), and (D).
Effect of Erroneous Certifications of Successful Completion of Terms of
Service (Sec. 2526.70)
Under Sec. 146A(b) of the NCSA, if the Corporation finds that a
certification made under Sec. 146A(a) is erroneous or incorrect, the
Corporation shall assess a charge against the national service program
which made the certification. The charge is to be assessed for the
amount of any payment which the Corporation has or may make from the
National Service Trust based on the erroneous certification. In
assessing the amount of a charge, the Corporation is to consider the
full facts and circumstances surrounding the erroneous or incorrect
certification.
This proposed rule implements Sec. 146A(b) and specifies that any
Corporation determination in regard to a charge under Sec. 2526.70
will not preclude the Corporation from taking any other actions which
may be warranted under other applicable authorities, such as the
Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act.
Public Service Loan Forgiveness and AmeriCorps (Sec. 2526.20)
On September 27, 2007, President Bush signed the College Cost
Reduction and Access Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-84) into law. The CCRAA
created the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program. This program
offers forgiveness for outstanding Federal Direct loans for those
individuals who make 120 qualifying payments after October 1, 2007,
while working full-time in a ``public service job.'' In the Department
of Education's implementing rules, ``public service job'' has been
defined to include ``serving in a full-time AmeriCorps * * *
position.'' (34 CFR 685.219(c); 73 FR 63527, Oct. 23, 2008).
``AmeriCorps position'' as defined in that section would include full-
time service in AmeriCorps State and National, AmeriCorps NCCC,
AmeriCorps VISTA, and ServeAmerica Fellowships.
Generally, an individual cannot receive an education award and
related interest benefits from the National Service Trust as well as
other loan cancellation benefits for the same service. For example, the
law authorizing the Teacher Loan Forgiveness Program (TLFP) explicitly
states that ``no borrower may, for the same service, receive a benefit
under this [program] and subtitle D of title I of the National and
Community Service Act of 1990.'' (20 U.S.C. 1078-10(g)(2)). Thus, an
AmeriCorps member serving in a teacher corps program would have to
choose whether to count the service year towards TLFP or AmeriCorps,
but would not be able take both benefits for the same period of
service.
The Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program is an exception to this
general rule. Service performed by an individual serving in a full-time
AmeriCorps position may be credited to both an education award and
Public Service Loan Forgiveness.
This rule amends Sec. 2526.60 to include an exception to the
general prohibition on an individual's receiving an education award and
related interest benefits from the National Service Trust as well as
other loan cancellation benefits for the Public Service Loan
Forgiveness Program.
For more information on qualifying for Public Service Loan
Forgiveness while serving in AmeriCorps, please visit: https://www.nationalservice.gov/for_organizations/highered/ccraa.asp.
Term Limits for AmeriCorps State and National (Sec. 2522.235)
AmeriCorps State and National is the national service program
funded under subtitle C of title I of the NCSA. Prior to passage of the
Serve America Act, Sec. 140(h) of the NCSA included a limitation that
no program could use any Federal funds to support an individual during
a third term of service in an AmeriCorps State and National position.
The Serve America Act removed Sec. 140(h) of the NCSA, thereby
eliminating the statutory limitation on the number of terms in which
one could be supported with Federal funds while serving in AmeriCorps
State and National position. The Serve America Act amended Sec. 146(c)
by changing the limitation from receiving awards for the first two
terms of service to receiving up to the value of two full-time
education awards. As discussed in the section on the limitation of
education award receipt, these amendments now give the
[[Page 8022]]
Corporation the flexibility to support a single individual for more
than two terms of service in less-than-full-time terms. The amendments
do not guarantee an individual may serve more than two terms of
service, nor do they direct the Corporation to provide an individual
with the opportunity to serve more than two terms of service. Rather,
the amended provision establishes a new limitation that the Corporation
must enforce.
Theoretically, using the calculation for the aggregate value of
awards received (discussed previously in this preamble), without term
limitations, an individual could potentially serve as few as two full-
time terms, or as many as 9 minimum-time terms, in AmeriCorps State and
National. The number of minimum-time terms could be even higher if an
individual leaves one or more terms for compelling personal
circumstances. A minimum-time term may be completed over two years.
Thus, without term limitations, a single individual could potentially
serve in AmeriCorps State and National for nearly 20 years.
By statute, one of the Corporation's guiding purposes is to
``encourage citizens of the United States * * * to engage in full-time
or part-time national service.'' In furtherance of this, the
Corporation's longstanding policy is to limit the number of terms an
individual may serve in an approved national service position to ensure
that there are opportunities for all interested Americans to serve.
Increasingly, applications for AmeriCorps far exceed available
positions. The Corporation's current limitation of two terms of service
in AmeriCorps State and National means that, after a maximum of two
terms, a position will be available for a new individual to have an
opportunity to serve.
As discussed previously in this preamble, however, the Corporation
appreciates that the law as amended affords more opportunities to serve
for those individuals who serve in less-than-full-time positions. To
balance the increased flexibility afforded by the amended statute with
the Corporation's interest in providing more Americans an opportunity
to serve, the Corporation proposes to double the number of available
terms in AmeriCorps State and National from two to four. This would
provide twice as many opportunities as were previously available, but
would place a reasonable limit in order to ensure service opportunities
are available for other interested participants.
This proposed rule amends Sec. 2522.235 to limit the number of
terms an individual may serve in AmeriCorps State and National to four.
A term of service includes full-time, part-time, and reduced-part-time
terms, as well as any term from which one exits after serving 15
percent of the agreed term of service or a term from which one is
exited for misconduct. If a person leaves for reasons other than
misconduct prior to serving 15%, the term is not considered a term of
service for the purposes of this limitation. This does not mean that an
individual is guaranteed four terms of service in AmeriCorps State and
National.
Exhaustion of the number of terms one serves in AmeriCorps State
and National would not necessarily prevent an individual from enrolling
in a position in another national service program, such as AmeriCorps
NCCC, AmeriCorps VISTA, or Silver Scholars, and receiving an education
award for successful completion of the service. For example, if an
individual serves four minimum-time terms in AmeriCorps State and
National, for an aggregate value of .85 education awards received, the
individual cou