Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model ERJ 190-100 LR, -100 IGW, -100 STD, -200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW Airplanes, 7929-7931 [2010-3116]
Download as PDF
7929
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 35
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0418; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–020–AD; Amendment
39–16201; AD 2010–04–08]
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on May 7, 2009 (74 FR 21285).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 190–100 LR,
–100 IGW, –100 STD, –200 STD, –200
LR, and –200 IGW Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
During routine inspection procedures on
the wing assembly line it was identified the
possibility of cracks and deformation
developing during assembly on the internal
wing spars and rib flanges, causing a safe[ty]
margin reduction.
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is cracking and
deformation of wing spar and rib
flanges, which could result in loss of
structural integrity of the wing. We are
issuing this AD to require actions to
correct the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
March 30, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:17 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of March 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2848; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
During routine inspection procedures on
the wing assembly line it was identified the
possibility of cracks and deformation
developing during assembly on the internal
wing spars and rib flanges, causing a safe[ty]
margin reduction.
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is cracking and
deformation of wing spar and rib
flanges, which could result in loss of
structural integrity of the wing.
Corrective actions include performing a
detailed inspection for damage on wing
spar I, II, and III flanges and on certain
ˆ
rib flanges, and contacting Agencia
Nacional de Aviacao Civil (ANAC) (or
¸˜
its delegated agent) and Embraer for an
approved repair. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comments received.
Request To Remove Certain Model ERJ
190 Airplanes
Embraer requests that we remove
Model ERJ 190–100 ECJ airplanes from
the applicability of the NPRM, because
that model is not included in the
effectivity statement of Embraer Service
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bulletin 190–57–0023, dated June 9,
2008, and is not subject to the unsafe
condition addressed by the NPRM.
We agree, for the reasons provided by
the commenter. We have revised the
applicability statement of the AD
accordingly.
Request To Change Repair Contact
Authority
Embraer requests that we change
paragraph (f)(2) of the NPRM to require
that any repair of detected cracking or
deformation be approved by either the
FAA or the ANAC, and that Embraer
may be contacted for repair support.
Embraer states that the appropriate
corrective action would be applying an
authority-approved repair to the
damaged wing rib and spar flanges.
We disagree with the commenter’s
request to change paragraph (f)(2) of this
AD. As specified in paragraph (g)(2) of
this AD, corrective actions obtained
from a manufacturer cannot be used
unless they are FAA-approved.
Paragraph (g)(2) of this AD also states
that corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by
the State of Design Authority, in this
case ANAC (or its delegated agent). We
have not changed the AD in this regard.
Request To State When No Further
Action Is Required
Embraer requests that we add a
paragraph (f)(3) to the NPRM stating ‘‘If
no cracking or deformation is detected
during the inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, no further
action is required.’’ Embraer did not
provide justification for this request.
We agree with Embraer’s request to
add the statement as clarification. We
have therefore added paragraph (f)(3) to
the AD.
Explanation of Change to Costs of
Compliance
Since issuance of the NPRM, we have
increased the labor rate used in the
Costs of Compliance from $80 per workhour to $85 per work-hour. The Costs of
Compliance information, below, reflects
this increase in the specified hourly
labor rate.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
7930
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the
AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
27 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 10 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $22,950, or $850 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:17 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
–200 LR, and –200 IGW airplanes,
certificated in any category, serial numbers
19000002, 19000004, and 19000006 through
19000062 inclusive.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
The unsafe condition is cracking and
deformation of wing spar and rib flanges,
which could result in loss of structural
integrity of the wing. Corrective actions
include performing a detailed inspection for
damage on wing spar I, II, and III flanges and
ˆ
on certain rib flanges, and contacting Agencia
Nacional de Aviacao Civil (ANAC) (or its
¸˜
delegated agent) and Embraer for an
approved repair.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
2010–04–08 Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER):
Amendment 39–16201. Docket No.
FAA–2009–0418; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–020–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective March 30, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Empresa Brasileira
de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model ERJ
190–100 LR, –100 IGW, –100 STD, –200 STD,
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
During routine inspection procedures on
the wing assembly line it was identified the
possibility of cracks and deformation
developing during assembly on the internal
wing spars and rib flanges, causing a safe[ty]
margin reduction.
*
*
*
*
*
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) Before the accumulation of 5,000 total
flight cycles on the airplane, or within 1,000
flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later: Perform a
detailed inspection of the left and right wing
rib and spars I, II, and III flanges to detect
cracking or deformation, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer
Service Bulletin 190–57–0023, dated June 9,
2008.
(2) If any cracking or deformation is
detected during the inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further
flight, send the inspection results and request
for repair instructions to ANAC (or its
delegated agent) and Embraer Technical
Support; e-mail: structure@embraer.com.br;
and do the repair.
(3) If no cracking or deformation is
detected during the inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, no further action
is required by this AD.
FAA AD Differences
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
PO 00000
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57: Wings.
Sfmt 4700
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
Although the MCAI or service information
allows further flight after cracks are found
during compliance with the required action,
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD requires that you
repair the crack(s) before further flight.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Kenny Kaulia,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2848; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness
Directive 2008–10–03, effective October 21,
2008; and Embraer Service Bulletin 190–57–
0023, dated June 9, 2008; for related
information.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Embraer Service Bulletin
190–57–0023, dated June 9, 2008, as
applicable, to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro
˜
Faria Lima, 2170—Putim—12227–901 Sao
Jose dos Campos—SP—BRASIL; telephone:
+55 12 3927–5852 or +55 12 3309–0732; fax:
+55 12 3927–7546; e-mail:
distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet: https://
www.flyembraer.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
5, 2010.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–3116 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:17 Feb 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0038; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–110–AD; Amendment
39–16203; AD 2010–04–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A380–841, –842, and –861 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
the products listed above. This AD
results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
During the flight test campaign of the
A380–861 model (Engine Alliance powered),
some cracks were found on the Movable Flap
Track Fairing number 6 (MFTF#6).
These cracks were located at the pivot
attachment support-ring and at the U-frame
in the attachment area to aft-kinematic. In
addition, delamination has been observed
within the monolithic Carbon Fibre
Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) structure around
the pivot support-ring.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to in-flight loss of the MFTF#6, potentially
resulting in injuries to persons on the
ground.
*
*
*
*
*
This AD requires actions that are
intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
March 10, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of March 10, 2010.
On May 28, 2009 (74 FR 22422, May
13, 2009), the Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication
listed in the AD.
We must receive comments on this
AD by April 9, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7931
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On May 1, 2009, the FAA issued AD
2009–10–07, Amendment 39–15902 (74
FR 22422, May 13, 2009). That AD
required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on the products listed
above.
Since we issued that AD, the
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2009–0152,
dated July 14, 2009 (referred to after this
as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
During the flight test campaign of the
A380–861 model (Engine Alliance powered),
some cracks were found on the Movable Flap
Track Fairing number 6 (MFTF#6).
These cracks were located at the pivot
attachment support-ring and at the U-frame
in the attachment area to aft-kinematic. In
addition, delamination has been observed
within the monolithic Carbon Fibre
Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) structure around
the pivot support-ring.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to in-flight loss of the MFTF#6, potentially
resulting in injuries to persons on the
ground.
To prevent the risk of a MFTF#6
detachment, EASA AD 2008–0216 (which
corresponds to FAA AD 2009–10–07)
required an inspection programme in order to
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7929-7931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3116]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 7929]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0418; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-020-AD;
Amendment 39-16201; AD 2010-04-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 190-100 LR, -100 IGW, -100 STD, -200 STD, -200 LR,
and -200 IGW Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
During routine inspection procedures on the wing assembly line
it was identified the possibility of cracks and deformation
developing during assembly on the internal wing spars and rib
flanges, causing a safe[ty] margin reduction.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is cracking and deformation of wing spar and rib
flanges, which could result in loss of structural integrity of the
wing. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective March 30, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 30,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2848; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on May 7, 2009 (74 FR
21285). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
During routine inspection procedures on the wing assembly line
it was identified the possibility of cracks and deformation
developing during assembly on the internal wing spars and rib
flanges, causing a safe[ty] margin reduction.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is cracking and deformation of wing spar and rib
flanges, which could result in loss of structural integrity of the
wing. Corrective actions include performing a detailed inspection for
damage on wing spar I, II, and III flanges and on certain rib flanges,
and contacting Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil
(ANAC) (or its delegated agent) and Embraer for an approved repair. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
Request To Remove Certain Model ERJ 190 Airplanes
Embraer requests that we remove Model ERJ 190-100 ECJ airplanes
from the applicability of the NPRM, because that model is not included
in the effectivity statement of Embraer Service Bulletin 190-57-0023,
dated June 9, 2008, and is not subject to the unsafe condition
addressed by the NPRM.
We agree, for the reasons provided by the commenter. We have
revised the applicability statement of the AD accordingly.
Request To Change Repair Contact Authority
Embraer requests that we change paragraph (f)(2) of the NPRM to
require that any repair of detected cracking or deformation be approved
by either the FAA or the ANAC, and that Embraer may be contacted for
repair support. Embraer states that the appropriate corrective action
would be applying an authority-approved repair to the damaged wing rib
and spar flanges.
We disagree with the commenter's request to change paragraph (f)(2)
of this AD. As specified in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, corrective
actions obtained from a manufacturer cannot be used unless they are
FAA-approved. Paragraph (g)(2) of this AD also states that corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority, in this case ANAC (or its delegated agent). We
have not changed the AD in this regard.
Request To State When No Further Action Is Required
Embraer requests that we add a paragraph (f)(3) to the NPRM stating
``If no cracking or deformation is detected during the inspection
required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, no further action is
required.'' Embraer did not provide justification for this request.
We agree with Embraer's request to add the statement as
clarification. We have therefore added paragraph (f)(3) to the AD.
Explanation of Change to Costs of Compliance
Since issuance of the NPRM, we have increased the labor rate used
in the Costs of Compliance from $80 per work-hour to $85 per work-hour.
The Costs of Compliance information, below, reflects this increase in
the specified hourly labor rate.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the changes described previously.
[[Page 7930]]
We determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden
on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 27 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 10 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $22,950, or $850 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-04-08 Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER):
Amendment 39-16201. Docket No. FAA-2009-0418; Directorate Identifier
2009-NM-020-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective March
30, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 190-100 LR, -100 IGW, -100 STD, -200 STD, -200
LR, and -200 IGW airplanes, certificated in any category, serial
numbers 19000002, 19000004, and 19000006 through 19000062 inclusive.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
During routine inspection procedures on the wing assembly line
it was identified the possibility of cracks and deformation
developing during assembly on the internal wing spars and rib
flanges, causing a safe[ty] margin reduction.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is cracking and deformation of wing spar and
rib flanges, which could result in loss of structural integrity of
the wing. Corrective actions include performing a detailed
inspection for damage on wing spar I, II, and III flanges and on
certain rib flanges, and contacting Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de
Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC) (or its delegated agent) and
Embraer for an approved repair.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Before the accumulation of 5,000 total flight cycles on the
airplane, or within 1,000 flight cycles after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later: Perform a detailed inspection of
the left and right wing rib and spars I, II, and III flanges to
detect cracking or deformation, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer Service Bulletin 190-57-0023,
dated June 9, 2008.
(2) If any cracking or deformation is detected during the
inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further
flight, send the inspection results and request for repair
instructions to ANAC (or its delegated agent) and Embraer Technical
Support; e-mail: structure@embraer.com.br; and do the repair.
(3) If no cracking or deformation is detected during the
inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, no further
action is required by this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: Although the MCAI or service information allows further
flight after cracks are found during compliance with the required
action, paragraph (f)(2) of this AD requires that you repair the
crack(s) before further flight.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
[[Page 7931]]
ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2848; fax (425)
227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which
the AMOC applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI)
or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2008-10-03,
effective October 21, 2008; and Embraer Service Bulletin 190-57-
0023, dated June 9, 2008; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Embraer Service Bulletin 190-57-0023, dated
June 9, 2008, as applicable, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--
Putim--12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--BRASIL; telephone:
+55 12 3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax: +55 12 3927-7546; e-mail:
distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet: https://www.flyembraer.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 5, 2010.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-3116 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P