Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Corporation (RRC) AE 3007A Series Turbofan Engines, 7209-7212 [2010-3145]
Download as PDF
7209
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 32
Thursday, February 18, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0811; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NE–41–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
Corporation (RRC) AE 3007A Series
Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
RRC AE 3007A series turbofan engines.
This proposed AD would require
removing or performing initial and
repetitive eddy current inspections
(ECIs) or surface wave ultrasonic testing
(SWUT) inspections on high-pressure
turbine (HPT) stage 2 wheels for cracks.
This proposed AD also reduces the
approved life limits of certain HPT stage
2 wheels. This proposed AD results
from reports of cracked HPT stage 2
wheels. We are proposing this AD to
prevent uncontained failure of the HPT
stage 2 wheel and damage to the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by March 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:08 Feb 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
You can get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from
Rolls-Royce Corporation, P.O. Box 420,
Speed Code U15, Indianapolis, IN
46206–0420, e-mail:
indy.pubs.services@rolls-royce.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyri
Zaroyiannis, Aerospace Engineer,
Chicago Aircraft Certification Office,
Small Airplane Directorate, FAA, 2300
E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018;
e-mail: kyri.zaroyiannis@faa.gov;
telephone (847) 294–7836; fax (847)
294–7834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposal. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2009–0811; Directorate Identifier
2008–NE–41–AD’’ in the subject line of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information you provide.
We will also post a report summarizing
each substantive verbal contact with
FAA personnel concerning this
proposed AD. Using the search function
of the Web site, anyone can find and
read the comments in any of our
dockets, including, if provided, the
name of the individual who sent the
comment (or signed the comment on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
Discussion
On September 8, 2008, we issued
emergency AD 2008–19–51 that applied
to RRC AE 3007A series turbofan
engines. That AD required performing
initial and repetitive eddy current
inspections (ECIs) on HPT stage 2
wheels that have accumulated 6,500 or
more cycles-since-new (CSN). That AD
resulted from reports of HPT stage 2
wheels that had cracks in the bores of
the wheels. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in a possible
uncontained failure of the HPT stage 2
wheel, which could cause damage to the
airplane.
Actions Since AD 2008–19–51 Was
Issued
After we issued emergency AD 2008–
19–51, we determined that the cracks in
the HPT stage 2 wheel bores are caused
by a thermally-induced high stress in
the disk bore, which was not identified
at the time of the original certification.
We performed a new risk assessment for
cracking in the bore of the HPT stage 2
wheel using the FAA methodology
guidelines in FAA Advisory Circular
39–8 and the results of the inspections
from AD 2008–19–51. The risk
assessment takes into account physical
characteristics about the cracks that
were not available when we issued AD
2008–19–51. The new risk assessment,
in combination with a sufficient number
of early inspections, showed that the
risk profile was not rapidly increasing,
which was a concern when we issued
AD 2008–19–51. Using this new
information, we determined we could
change the compliance requirements for
the ECI while still maintaining a level
of safety consistent with the intent of
the original AD 2008–19–51. We
changed the new compliance schedule
to an interval of 150 cycles-in-service
(CIS) between wheel populations. The
intervals for the wheel populations were
based on CSN, and they varied because
of the distribution of the affected wheels
throughout the fleet at that time. A
distribution based on CSN resulted in a
compliance schedule that inspected the
fleet from the highest time, highest risk
E:\FR\FM\18FEP1.SGM
18FEP1
7210
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 32 / Thursday, February 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
wheels to the lowest time, lowest risk
wheels. It allowed us to control the
overall risk consistent with the intent of
AD 2008–19–51.
We also determined that a
requirement to perform the ECI by a
certain CIS is by itself sufficient to
maintain the level of safety consistent
with the intent of the original AD 2008–
19–51. Because of that determination,
we no longer prohibit installing any
engine that had an HPT stage 2 wheel
with more than 6,500 CSN unless the
wheel was inspected. Instead, we
modified that requirement to apply only
to HPT stage 2 wheels removed from
service as a result of complying with AD
2008–26–06 or emergency AD 2008–19–
51.
Finally, we specified the part
numbers (P/Ns) for the affected HPT
stage 2 wheels to ensure proper
identification.
On December 12, 2008, we issued AD
2008–26–06 as an immediately adopted
rule to mandate a short-term program
(90 days) to ensure the continued
airworthiness of the product. That AD
published in the Federal Register on
December 24, 2008 (73 FR 78927).
Actions Since AD 2008–26–06 Was
Issued
A few months after we issued AD
2008–26–06 we received reports of
additional cracks in the HPT stage 2
wheels. A revised risk assessment that
included these additional reports
indicated that we needed to require a
higher inspection rate. For this reason,
we issued Emergency AD 2009–08–51
on April 10, 2009. That AD also
provides instructions for an optional
SWUT inspection. We then published a
final rule; request for comments (74 FR
22091, May 12, 2009) to make the
emergency actions applicable to all
persons.
We are now proceeding through the
normal rule making process to ensure
full public comment on our proposed
actions. In this proposed AD, we are
still requiring the same removal from
service or ECI or SWUT inspections, but
we are expanding the scope of the
compliance schedule to more engines by
including wheels with lower CSN. We
are also including a requirement for
repetitive inspections. In addition, we
have identified by serial number a group
of HPT stage 2 wheels that were
repaired while in-service; because of
this repair those wheels can only be
inspected by the ECI method. We have
also determined that the engine cycle
life limit (ECLL) of the HPT stage 2
wheels, P/N 23075345 and 23084520,
covered by this proposed AD should be
reduced to 23,000 CSN and that the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:08 Feb 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
ECLL of all other part number HPT stage
2 wheels covered by this proposed AD
should be reduced to 20,000 CSN on the
effective date of this AD.
The occurrence of cracked HPT stage
2 wheels has been shown by statistical
analysis of field data to have a causal
link to a manufacturing process that led
to incomplete shot peening on the drive
arm fillets (shaft inner diameter fillet) of
the wheel. Improvements to the fixed
manufacturing process have addressed
this incomplete peening condition.
Therefore, HPT stage 2 wheels that have
been determined to have been fully shot
peened in the drive arm fillet are
excluded from the inspection
requirements of this proposed AD.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the
technical contents of:
• RRC Alert Service Bulletin AE
3007A–A–72–367, Revision 2, dated
June 22, 2009, that describes procedures
for ECI of the HPT stage 2 wheel on AE
3007A series engines.
• RRC Service Bulletin AE 3007A–
72–368, Revision 2, dated April 28,
2009, that describes the procedures for
SWUT inspection of the HPT stage 2
wheel on AE 3007A series turbofan
engines.
• RRC Service Bulletin AE 3007A–
72–369, Revision 2, dated November 5,
2009, that describes the procedures for
SWUT inspection of the HPT stage 2
wheel on AE 3007A series turbofan
engines.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other products of this same
type design. We are proposing this AD,
which would require:
• Removing from service any engine
with certain P/N HPT stage 2 wheels
that have a CSN specified in Table 1 of
this AD by the compliance time
specified in Table 1 of this AD; or
• Performing an ECI or SWUT
inspection on certain P/N HPT stage 2
wheels that have a CSN specified in
Table 1 of this AD by the compliance
time specified in Table 1 of this AD; and
• Performing repetitive ECI or SWUT
inspections of the HPT stage 2 wheels
within 3,000 cycles-since-last
inspection.
You must use the service information
described previously to perform the
actions required by this AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Interim Action
These actions are interim actions and
we may take further rulemaking actions
in the future.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 1402 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about 2
work-hours per engine to perform both
the proposed ECI and proposed SWUT.
The average labor rate is $85 per workhour. No parts are required for the
inspection. We estimate the prorated life
lost per stage 2 wheel is about $13,177.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
total cost of the proposed AD to U.S.
operators to be $18,712,494. This
estimate is exclusive of any warranty
coverage.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
E:\FR\FM\18FEP1.SGM
18FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 32 / Thursday, February 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. You may get a copy
of this summary at the address listed
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me
by the Administrator, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
Rolls-Royce Corporation (Formerly Allison
Engine Company): Docket No. FAA–2009–
0811; Directorate Identifier 2008–NE–41–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by March
22, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2009–08–51.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Rolls-Royce
Corporation (RRC) AE 3007A series turbofan
engines with high-pressure turbine (HPT)
stage 2 wheels, part numbers (P/Ns)
23069438, 23069592, 23074462, 23074644,
23075345, or 23084520 installed. These
engines are installed on, but not limited to,
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S. A.
(EMBRAER) EMB–135 and EMB–145
airplanes.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of cracked
HPT stage 2 wheels. We are issuing this AD
to prevent uncontained failure of the HPT
stage 2 wheel and damage to the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
(2) All engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel,
P/N 23075345, that has a serial number (S/N)
specified in Table 1 of this AD, and
(3) All engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel,
P/N 23074462, that has a S/N specified in
Table 2 of this AD.
TABLE 1—HPT STAGE 2 WHEEL, P/N
23075345 BY S/N EXCLUDED FROM
INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS (G)
THROUGH (I) OF THIS AD
MM507646
MM508144
MM508153
MM508176
MM508186
MM508188
MM508205
MM508208
MM508211
MM508221
MM508241
MM508248
MM508251
MM508264
MM508305
MM508311
MM508319
MM508320
MM508322
MM508337
MM508338
MM508382
MM508387
TABLE 2—HPT STAGE 2 WHEEL, P/N
23074462 BY S/N EXCLUDED FROM
INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS (G)
THROUGH (I) OF THIS AD
MM504890
MM504963
MM504990
MM504995
MM505007
MM505025
MM505034
MM505041
MM505045
MM505046
MM505017
MM505048
MM505054
MM505055
MM505056
MM505061
All ‘‘MM’’ prefix S/
Ns higher than
MM505061.
All S/Ns with ‘‘MW’’
prefix.
Initial Eddy Current Inspection (ECI) or
Surface Wave Ultrasonic Testing (SWUT)
Inspection
(g) For engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel,
P/Ns 23069438, 23069592, 23074462,
23074644, or 23075345, remove the engine
from service or perform an initial inspection
of the wheel by the cycle limit specified in
Table 3 of this AD. Use one of the following
methods for the inspection:
(1) For HPT stage 2 wheels that have S/Ns
listed in Table 4 of this AD, use paragraphs
2.A. through 2.C.(4) of RRC Alert Service
Bulletin (ASB) AE 3007A–A–72–367,
Revision 2 dated June 22, 2009, to inspect the
wheel.
(2) For HPT stage 2 wheels that have S/Ns
not listed in Table 4 of this AD, use
paragraphs 2.A. through 2.C.(4) of RRC ASB
AE 3007A–A–72–367, Revision 2, dated June
22, 2009, or use paragraphs 2.A. through 2.N.
of RRC Service Bulletin (SB) AE 3007A–72–
368, Revision 2, dated April 28, 2009; or use
2.A. through 2.V.(4) of RRC SB AE 3007A–
72–369, Revision 2, dated November 5, 2009,
to perform the inspections.
13:08 Feb 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
TABLE 3—COMPLIANCE TIMES FOR
ENGINE REMOVAL OR ECI OR
SWUT INSPECTION OF THE HPT
STAGE 2 WHEELS BY CYCLESSINCE-NEW (CSN)
For HPT stage
2 wheels with
the following
CSN on the effective date of
this AD:
Remove engine from service
or inspect wheel within the
following cycles-in-service
(CIS) after the effective date
of this AD:
(3) 17,500 or
more CSN.
Remove engine from service
or inspect before next
flight.
15 CIS.
(4) 10,000 to
17,499 CSN.
(5) 9,999 or
fewer CSN.
Before accumulating 10,015
CSN.
TABLE 4—S/NS OF HPT STAGE 2
WHEELS TO BE INSPECTED BY SB
AE 3007A–72–367 (ECI METHOD
ONLY)
HPT Stage 2 Wheels Requiring ECI Method
Only
MM119400
MM119480
MM119508
MM155847
MM155907
MM155908
MM183236
MM183362
MM183754
MM183762
MM183796
MM183808
MM183831
MM228730
MM228951
MM503748
MM504004
MM57188
MM57440
MM57480
Installation Prohibition
(h) After the effective date of this AD, don’t
return to service, any HPT stage 2 wheel that
was installed in any RRC AE 3007A series
engine that has been removed as a result of
the inspection requirements of this AD,
unless the HPT stage 2 wheel was inspected
as specified in RRC ASB AE 3007A–A–72–
367, Revision 2, dated June 22, 2009; or RRC
SB AE 3007A–72–368, Revision 2, dated
April 28, 2009; or RRC SB AE 3007A–72–
369, Revision 2, dated November 5, 2009.
Repetitive Inspection
(i) Thereafter, within 3,000 cycles-sincelast inspection, remove the engine from
service until an ECI or SWUT inspection is
performed on the HPT stage 2 wheel. Use
paragraphs 2.A. through 2.C.(4) of RRC ASB
AE 3007A–A–72–367, Revision 2, dated June
22, 2009, or use paragraphs 2.A. through 2.N.
of RRC SB AE 3007A–72–368, Revision 2,
dated April 28, 2009; or use 2.A. through
2.V.(4) of RRC SB AE 3007A–72–369,
Revision 2, dated November 5, 2009, to
inspect the wheel.
New, Reduced Engine Cycle Life Limit and
Removal From Service
(j) For HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23084520,
do the following:
(1) For wheels that have 22,985 CSN or
more on the effective date of this AD, remove
HPT Stage 2 Wheels Exempted From the
Inspection Requirements of This AD
(f) The following engines are exempt from
the inspection requirements of this AD:
(1) All engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel,
P/N 23084520.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
7211
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18FEP1.SGM
18FEP1
7212
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 32 / Thursday, February 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
the wheel from service within 15 CIS after
the effective date of this AD.
(2) Thereafter, remove HPT stage 2 wheels,
P/N 23084520, before exceeding the new,
reduced engine cycle life limit (ECLL) of
23,000 CSN.
(k) For HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23075345
and 23074644, do the following:
(1) For wheels that have 19,985 CSN or
more on the effective date of this AD, remove
the wheel from service within 15 CIS after
the effective date of this AD unless paragraph
(k)(3) of this AD applies.
(2) Thereafter, remove HPT stage 2 wheels,
P/N 23075345 and 23074644, before
exceeding the new, reduced ECLL of 20,000
CSN.
(3) For HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23075345,
that have a S/N listed in Table 5 of this AD
and that have 22,985 CSN or more on the
effective date of this AD, remove the wheel
from service within 15 CIS after the effective
date of this AD.
(4) Thereafter, for HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N
23075345, that have a S/N listed in Table 5
of this AD, remove the wheel from service
before exceeding the new, reduced ECLL of
23,000 CSN.
TABLE 5—S/NS OF HPT STAGE 2 WHEEL, P/N 23075345, ELIGIBLE TO REMAIN IN SERVICE UNTIL 23,000 CSN
MM507646
MM508144
MM508153
MM508176
MM508186
MM508188
MM508205
MM508208
MM508211
MM508221
MM508241
MM508248
(l) For wheels, P/N 23069438, in engines
that have not complied with RRC SB AE
3007A–72–176, Revision 5, dated September
2, 2008, or SB AE 3007A–72–215, Revision
2, dated September 28, 2009, remove the
wheel before exceeding the new, reduced
ECLL of 10,000 CSN.
(m) For wheels, P/N 23069438, in engines
that have complied with RRC SB AE 3007A–
72–176, Revision 5, dated September 2, 2008
or SB AE 3007A–72–215, Revision 2, dated
September 28, 2009, do the following:
(1) For wheels that have 19,985 CSN or
more on the effective date of this AD, remove
the wheel from service within 15 CIS after
the effective date of this AD.
(2) Thereafter, remove the wheel from
service before exceeding the new, reduced
ECLL of 20,000 CSN.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(n) The Manager, Chicago Aircraft
Certification Office, has the authority to
approve alternative methods of compliance
for this AD if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Special Flight Permits
(o) Under 14 CFR 39.23, we are limiting the
special flight permits for this AD by
restricting the flight to essential flight crew
only.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Related Information
(p) Contact Kyri Zaroyiannis, Aerospace
Engineer, Chicago Aircraft Certification
Office, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA,
2300 E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018;
e-mail: kyri.zaroyiannis@faa.gov; telephone
(847) 294–7836; fax (847) 294–7834, for more
information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
February 11, 2010.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–3145 Filed 2–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:08 Feb 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
MM508251
MM508264
MM508305
MM508311
MM508319
MM508320
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 1625
RIN 3046–AA87
Definition of ‘‘Reasonable Factors
Other Than Age’’ Under the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act
AGENCY: Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (‘‘EEOC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) is issuing this notice of
proposed rulemaking (‘‘NPRM’’) to
address the meaning of ‘‘reasonable
factors other than age’’ (RFOA) under
the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act (‘‘ADEA’’).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 19, 2010. The
Commission will consider any
comments received on or before the
closing date and thereafter adopt final
regulations. Comments received after
the closing date will be considered to
the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• By mail to Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat,
Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission, U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, 131 ‘‘M’’
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507.
• By facsimile (‘‘FAX’’) machine to
(202) 663–4114. (There is no toll free
FAX number). Only comments of six or
fewer pages will be accepted via FAX
transmittal, in order to assure access to
the equipment. Receipt of FAX
transmittals will not be acknowledged,
except that the sender may request
confirmation of receipt by calling the
Executive Secretariat staff at (202) 663–
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
MM508322
MM508337
MM508338
MM508382
MM508387
4070 (voice) or (202) 663–4074 (TTY).
(These are not toll free numbers).
• By the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. After
accessing this Web site, follow its
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All comment
submissions must include the agency
name and docket number or the
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
for this rulemaking. Comments need be
submitted in only one of the abovelisted formats, not all three. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide.
Copies of the received comments also
will be available for inspection in the
EEOC Library, FOIA Reading Room, by
advanced appointment only, from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday
except legal holidays, from April 19,
2010 until the Commission publishes
the rule in final form. Persons who
schedule an appointment in the EEOC
Library, FOIA Reading Room, and need
assistance to view the comments will be
provided with appropriate aids upon
request, such as readers or print
magnifiers. To schedule an appointment
to inspect the comments at the EEOC
Library, FOIA Reading Room, contact
the EEOC Library by calling (202) 663–
4630 (voice) or (202) 663–4641 (TTY).
(These are not toll free numbers).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dianna B. Johnston, Assistant Legal
Counsel, or Lyn J. McDermott, Senior
Attorney-Advisor, at (202) 663–4638
(voice) or (202) 663–7026 (TTY). (These
are not toll free numbers). This notice
also is available in the following
formats: Large print, Braille, audio tape
and electronic file on computer disk.
Requests for this notice in an alternative
format should be made to the
Publications Information Center at
E:\FR\FM\18FEP1.SGM
18FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7209-7212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3145]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 32 / Thursday, February 18, 2010 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 7209]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0811; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-41-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Corporation (RRC) AE 3007A
Series Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for RRC AE 3007A series turbofan engines. This proposed AD would
require removing or performing initial and repetitive eddy current
inspections (ECIs) or surface wave ultrasonic testing (SWUT)
inspections on high-pressure turbine (HPT) stage 2 wheels for cracks.
This proposed AD also reduces the approved life limits of certain HPT
stage 2 wheels. This proposed AD results from reports of cracked HPT
stage 2 wheels. We are proposing this AD to prevent uncontained failure
of the HPT stage 2 wheel and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by March 22,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
You can get the service information identified in this proposed AD
from Rolls-Royce Corporation, P.O. Box 420, Speed Code U15,
Indianapolis, IN 46206-0420, e-mail: royce.com">indy.pubs.services@rolls-royce.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyri Zaroyiannis, Aerospace Engineer,
Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA,
2300 E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018; e-mail:
kyri.zaroyiannis@faa.gov; telephone (847) 294-7836; fax (847) 294-7834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0811; Directorate
Identifier 2008-NE-41-AD'' in the subject line of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD
in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
On September 8, 2008, we issued emergency AD 2008-19-51 that
applied to RRC AE 3007A series turbofan engines. That AD required
performing initial and repetitive eddy current inspections (ECIs) on
HPT stage 2 wheels that have accumulated 6,500 or more cycles-since-new
(CSN). That AD resulted from reports of HPT stage 2 wheels that had
cracks in the bores of the wheels. This condition, if not corrected,
could result in a possible uncontained failure of the HPT stage 2
wheel, which could cause damage to the airplane.
Actions Since AD 2008-19-51 Was Issued
After we issued emergency AD 2008-19-51, we determined that the
cracks in the HPT stage 2 wheel bores are caused by a thermally-induced
high stress in the disk bore, which was not identified at the time of
the original certification. We performed a new risk assessment for
cracking in the bore of the HPT stage 2 wheel using the FAA methodology
guidelines in FAA Advisory Circular 39-8 and the results of the
inspections from AD 2008-19-51. The risk assessment takes into account
physical characteristics about the cracks that were not available when
we issued AD 2008-19-51. The new risk assessment, in combination with a
sufficient number of early inspections, showed that the risk profile
was not rapidly increasing, which was a concern when we issued AD 2008-
19-51. Using this new information, we determined we could change the
compliance requirements for the ECI while still maintaining a level of
safety consistent with the intent of the original AD 2008-19-51. We
changed the new compliance schedule to an interval of 150 cycles-in-
service (CIS) between wheel populations. The intervals for the wheel
populations were based on CSN, and they varied because of the
distribution of the affected wheels throughout the fleet at that time.
A distribution based on CSN resulted in a compliance schedule that
inspected the fleet from the highest time, highest risk
[[Page 7210]]
wheels to the lowest time, lowest risk wheels. It allowed us to control
the overall risk consistent with the intent of AD 2008-19-51.
We also determined that a requirement to perform the ECI by a
certain CIS is by itself sufficient to maintain the level of safety
consistent with the intent of the original AD 2008-19-51. Because of
that determination, we no longer prohibit installing any engine that
had an HPT stage 2 wheel with more than 6,500 CSN unless the wheel was
inspected. Instead, we modified that requirement to apply only to HPT
stage 2 wheels removed from service as a result of complying with AD
2008-26-06 or emergency AD 2008-19-51.
Finally, we specified the part numbers (P/Ns) for the affected HPT
stage 2 wheels to ensure proper identification.
On December 12, 2008, we issued AD 2008-26-06 as an immediately
adopted rule to mandate a short-term program (90 days) to ensure the
continued airworthiness of the product. That AD published in the
Federal Register on December 24, 2008 (73 FR 78927).
Actions Since AD 2008-26-06 Was Issued
A few months after we issued AD 2008-26-06 we received reports of
additional cracks in the HPT stage 2 wheels. A revised risk assessment
that included these additional reports indicated that we needed to
require a higher inspection rate. For this reason, we issued Emergency
AD 2009-08-51 on April 10, 2009. That AD also provides instructions for
an optional SWUT inspection. We then published a final rule; request
for comments (74 FR 22091, May 12, 2009) to make the emergency actions
applicable to all persons.
We are now proceeding through the normal rule making process to
ensure full public comment on our proposed actions. In this proposed
AD, we are still requiring the same removal from service or ECI or SWUT
inspections, but we are expanding the scope of the compliance schedule
to more engines by including wheels with lower CSN. We are also
including a requirement for repetitive inspections. In addition, we
have identified by serial number a group of HPT stage 2 wheels that
were repaired while in-service; because of this repair those wheels can
only be inspected by the ECI method. We have also determined that the
engine cycle life limit (ECLL) of the HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23075345
and 23084520, covered by this proposed AD should be reduced to 23,000
CSN and that the ECLL of all other part number HPT stage 2 wheels
covered by this proposed AD should be reduced to 20,000 CSN on the
effective date of this AD.
The occurrence of cracked HPT stage 2 wheels has been shown by
statistical analysis of field data to have a causal link to a
manufacturing process that led to incomplete shot peening on the drive
arm fillets (shaft inner diameter fillet) of the wheel. Improvements to
the fixed manufacturing process have addressed this incomplete peening
condition. Therefore, HPT stage 2 wheels that have been determined to
have been fully shot peened in the drive arm fillet are excluded from
the inspection requirements of this proposed AD.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the technical contents of:
RRC Alert Service Bulletin AE 3007A-A-72-367, Revision 2,
dated June 22, 2009, that describes procedures for ECI of the HPT stage
2 wheel on AE 3007A series engines.
RRC Service Bulletin AE 3007A-72-368, Revision 2, dated
April 28, 2009, that describes the procedures for SWUT inspection of
the HPT stage 2 wheel on AE 3007A series turbofan engines.
RRC Service Bulletin AE 3007A-72-369, Revision 2, dated
November 5, 2009, that describes the procedures for SWUT inspection of
the HPT stage 2 wheel on AE 3007A series turbofan engines.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. We are proposing this AD, which would
require:
Removing from service any engine with certain P/N HPT
stage 2 wheels that have a CSN specified in Table 1 of this AD by the
compliance time specified in Table 1 of this AD; or
Performing an ECI or SWUT inspection on certain P/N HPT
stage 2 wheels that have a CSN specified in Table 1 of this AD by the
compliance time specified in Table 1 of this AD; and
Performing repetitive ECI or SWUT inspections of the HPT
stage 2 wheels within 3,000 cycles-since-last inspection.
You must use the service information described previously to
perform the actions required by this AD.
Interim Action
These actions are interim actions and we may take further
rulemaking actions in the future.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 1402 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 2 work-hours per engine to perform both the proposed ECI and
proposed SWUT. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. No parts
are required for the inspection. We estimate the prorated life lost per
stage 2 wheel is about $13,177. Based on these figures, we estimate the
total cost of the proposed AD to U.S. operators to be $18,712,494. This
estimate is exclusive of any warranty coverage.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities
[[Page 7211]]
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
Rolls-Royce Corporation (Formerly Allison Engine Company): Docket
No. FAA-2009-0811; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-41-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by March 22,
2010.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2009-08-51.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Rolls-Royce Corporation (RRC) AE 3007A
series turbofan engines with high-pressure turbine (HPT) stage 2
wheels, part numbers (P/Ns) 23069438, 23069592, 23074462, 23074644,
23075345, or 23084520 installed. These engines are installed on, but
not limited to, Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S. A. (EMBRAER)
EMB-135 and EMB-145 airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of cracked HPT stage 2 wheels.
We are issuing this AD to prevent uncontained failure of the HPT
stage 2 wheel and damage to the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
HPT Stage 2 Wheels Exempted From the Inspection Requirements of This AD
(f) The following engines are exempt from the inspection
requirements of this AD:
(1) All engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel, P/N 23084520.
(2) All engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel, P/N 23075345, that
has a serial number (S[sol]N) specified in Table 1 of this AD, and
(3) All engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel, P/N 23074462, that
has a S/N specified in Table 2 of this AD.
Table 1--HPT Stage 2 Wheel, P/N 23075345 by S/N Excluded From Inspection
Requirements (g) Through (i) of This AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MM507646 MM508211 MM508319
MM508144 MM508221 MM508320
MM508153 MM508241 MM508322
MM508176 MM508248 MM508337
MM508186 MM508251 MM508338
MM508188 MM508264 MM508382
MM508205 MM508305 MM508387
MM508208 MM508311
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--HPT Stage 2 Wheel, P/N 23074462 by S/N Excluded From Inspection
Requirements (g) Through (i) of This AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MM504890 MM505025 MM505054
MM504963 MM505034 MM505055
MM504990 MM505041 MM505056
MM504995 MM505045 MM505061
MM505007 MM505046 All ``MM'' prefix S/Ns
higher than MM505061.
MM505017 MM505048 All S/Ns with ``MW''
prefix.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial Eddy Current Inspection (ECI) or Surface Wave Ultrasonic
Testing (SWUT) Inspection
(g) For engines with an HPT stage 2 wheel, P/Ns 23069438,
23069592, 23074462, 23074644, or 23075345, remove the engine from
service or perform an initial inspection of the wheel by the cycle
limit specified in Table 3 of this AD. Use one of the following
methods for the inspection:
(1) For HPT stage 2 wheels that have S/Ns listed in Table 4 of
this AD, use paragraphs 2.A. through 2.C.(4) of RRC Alert Service
Bulletin (ASB) AE 3007A-A-72-367, Revision 2 dated June 22, 2009, to
inspect the wheel.
(2) For HPT stage 2 wheels that have S/Ns not listed in Table 4
of this AD, use paragraphs 2.A. through 2.C.(4) of RRC ASB AE 3007A-
A-72-367, Revision 2, dated June 22, 2009, or use paragraphs 2.A.
through 2.N. of RRC Service Bulletin (SB) AE 3007A-72-368, Revision
2, dated April 28, 2009; or use 2.A. through 2.V.(4) of RRC SB AE
3007A-72-369, Revision 2, dated November 5, 2009, to perform the
inspections.
Table 3--Compliance Times for Engine Removal or ECI or SWUT Inspection
of the HPT Stage 2 Wheels by Cycles-Since-New (CSN)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remove engine from service or
For HPT stage 2 wheels with the inspect wheel within the
following CSN on the effective date of following cycles-in-service
this AD: (CIS) after the effective date
of this AD:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) 17,500 or more CSN................. Remove engine from service or
inspect before next flight.
(4) 10,000 to 17,499 CSN............... 15 CIS.
(5) 9,999 or fewer CSN................. Before accumulating 10,015 CSN.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 4--S/Ns of HPT Stage 2 Wheels To Be Inspected by SB AE 3007A-72-
367 (ECI Method Only)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HPT Stage 2 Wheels Requiring ECI Method Only
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MM119400 MM183796
MM119480 MM183808
MM119508 MM183831
MM155847 MM228730
MM155907 MM228951
MM155908 MM503748
MM183236 MM504004
MM183362 MM57188
MM183754 MM57440
MM183762 MM57480
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation Prohibition
(h) After the effective date of this AD, don't return to
service, any HPT stage 2 wheel that was installed in any RRC AE
3007A series engine that has been removed as a result of the
inspection requirements of this AD, unless the HPT stage 2 wheel was
inspected as specified in RRC ASB AE 3007A-A-72-367, Revision 2,
dated June 22, 2009; or RRC SB AE 3007A-72-368, Revision 2, dated
April 28, 2009; or RRC SB AE 3007A-72-369, Revision 2, dated
November 5, 2009.
Repetitive Inspection
(i) Thereafter, within 3,000 cycles-since-last inspection,
remove the engine from service until an ECI or SWUT inspection is
performed on the HPT stage 2 wheel. Use paragraphs 2.A. through
2.C.(4) of RRC ASB AE 3007A-A-72-367, Revision 2, dated June 22,
2009, or use paragraphs 2.A. through 2.N. of RRC SB AE 3007A-72-368,
Revision 2, dated April 28, 2009; or use 2.A. through 2.V.(4) of RRC
SB AE 3007A-72-369, Revision 2, dated November 5, 2009, to inspect
the wheel.
New, Reduced Engine Cycle Life Limit and Removal From Service
(j) For HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23084520, do the following:
(1) For wheels that have 22,985 CSN or more on the effective
date of this AD, remove
[[Page 7212]]
the wheel from service within 15 CIS after the effective date of
this AD.
(2) Thereafter, remove HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23084520, before
exceeding the new, reduced engine cycle life limit (ECLL) of 23,000
CSN.
(k) For HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23075345 and 23074644, do the
following:
(1) For wheels that have 19,985 CSN or more on the effective
date of this AD, remove the wheel from service within 15 CIS after
the effective date of this AD unless paragraph (k)(3) of this AD
applies.
(2) Thereafter, remove HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23075345 and
23074644, before exceeding the new, reduced ECLL of 20,000 CSN.
(3) For HPT stage 2 wheels, P/N 23075345, that have a S/N listed
in Table 5 of this AD and that have 22,985 CSN or more on the
effective date of this AD, remove the wheel from service within 15
CIS after the effective date of this AD.
(4) Thereafter, for HPT stage 2 wheels, P[sol]N 23075345, that
have a S/N listed in Table 5 of this AD, remove the wheel from
service before exceeding the new, reduced ECLL of 23,000 CSN.
Table 5--S/Ns of HPT Stage 2 Wheel, P/N 23075345, Eligible To Remain in
Service Until 23,000 CSN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MM507646 MM508205 MM508251 MM508322
MM508144 MM508208 MM508264 MM508337
MM508153 MM508211 MM508305 MM508338
MM508176 MM508221 MM508311 MM508382
MM508186 MM508241 MM508319 MM508387
MM508188 MM508248 MM508320
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(l) For wheels, P/N 23069438, in engines that have not complied
with RRC SB AE 3007A-72-176, Revision 5, dated September 2, 2008, or
SB AE 3007A-72-215, Revision 2, dated September 28, 2009, remove the
wheel before exceeding the new, reduced ECLL of 10,000 CSN.
(m) For wheels, P/N 23069438, in engines that have complied with
RRC SB AE 3007A-72-176, Revision 5, dated September 2, 2008 or SB AE
3007A-72-215, Revision 2, dated September 28, 2009, do the
following:
(1) For wheels that have 19,985 CSN or more on the effective
date of this AD, remove the wheel from service within 15 CIS after
the effective date of this AD.
(2) Thereafter, remove the wheel from service before exceeding
the new, reduced ECLL of 20,000 CSN.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(n) The Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, has the
authority to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD
if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Special Flight Permits
(o) Under 14 CFR 39.23, we are limiting the special flight
permits for this AD by restricting the flight to essential flight
crew only.
Related Information
(p) Contact Kyri Zaroyiannis, Aerospace Engineer, Chicago
Aircraft Certification Office, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA, 2300
E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018; e-mail:
kyri.zaroyiannis@faa.gov; telephone (847) 294-7836; fax (847) 294-
7834, for more information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on February 11, 2010.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-3145 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P