Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties, 7274-7276 [2010-3028]
Download as PDF
7274
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 32 / Thursday, February 18, 2010 / Notices
the statutory requirements of section
512(l)(3) of the act.1 For subsequent
years, the preparation of the report
should take approximately 3 hours.
Thus, the total cost in subsequent years
would be $139.50.
Regarding the recordkeeping burden
associated with this collection of
information, FDA believes that most of
the necessary information for the annual
report required to be submitted under
section 512(l)(3) of the act is already
collected and maintained by animal
drug manufacturers under existing
requirements.
Animal drug manufacturers are
already required to maintain
distribution records for their drug
products to comply with FDA’s current
good manufacturing practice regulations
under § 211.196 (21 CFR § 211.96) (OMB
Control No. 0910–0139), and to comply
with regulations for periodic drug
experience reports under
§ 514.80(b)(4)(i) (OMB Control No.
0910–0284). Therefore, FDA believes
that manufacturers of animal drugs
already possess the computers, software,
and additional equipment necessary to
collect and maintain the necessary
records and to make reports.
Section 512(l)(3) of the act differs
from § 514.80(b)(4)(i) in that it requires
that records include separate
information for each month of the
calendar year. Under § 211.196 (OMB
Control No. 0910–0139), manufacturers
currently are required to maintain
distribution records that include the
dosage form and date the drug is
distributed. Additionally, FDA believes
that manufacturers already keep
detailed records of the dates when
antimicrobial drugs are distributed for
marketing and recall purposes from
which monthly reports can be prepared
as part of their usual and customary
practice. However, FDA estimates an
additional hourly burden required by
section 512(l)(3) of the act as shown in
table 2 of this document.
Dated: February 4, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2010–3029 Filed 2–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
1 BLS Occupation Employment and Wages, May
2006, by occupation, for all industries (https://
www.bls.gov). Wage ($46.50) includes mean hourly
wage of $33.22 for Standard Occupational
Classification 15–0000, computer and mathematics
occupations, all industries; we add 40 percent to
account for benefits.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:37 Feb 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2004–N–0390] (formerly
Docket No. 2004N–0503)
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Guidance on
Consultation Procedures: Foods
Derived From New Plant Varieties
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the information collection provisions of
FDA’s consultation procedures for foods
derived from new plant varieties,
including the information collection
provisions in the guidance entitled
‘‘Consultation Procedures: Foods
Derived From New Plant Varieties,’’ and
in Form FDA 3665 entitled ‘‘Final
Consultation For Food Derived From a
New Plant Variety (Biotechnology Final
Consultation),’’ which developers may
use to prepare the final consultation in
a standard format.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by April 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denver Presley, Jr., Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–
400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–
3793.
Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined in
44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c)
and includes agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal agencies
to provide a 60-day notice in the
Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology. In the Federal
Register of November 24, 2004 (69 FR
68379), FDA published a previous 60day notice requesting public comment
on this proposed collection of
information. FDA is publishing this
notice to update comments. Comments
previously submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management do not need to be
resubmitted because all such comments
that are responsive to the comment
request will be summarized and
responded to in the Information
Collection Request, i.e. 30-day notice,
submitted to OMB.
Guidance on Consultation Procedures:
Foods Derived From New Plant
Varieties
Since 1992, when FDA issued its
Statement of Policy: Foods Derived from
New Plant Varieties (the 1992 policy)
(57 FR 22984, May 29, 1992), FDA has
encouraged developers of new plant
varieties, including those varieties that
are developed through biotechnology, to
consult with FDA during the plant
development process to discuss possible
scientific and regulatory issues that
might arise. In the 1992 policy, FDA
explained that, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act),
developers of new foods (in this
E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM
18FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 32 / Thursday, February 18, 2010 / Notices
document food refers to both human
food and animal feed) have a
responsibility to ensure that the foods
they offer to consumers are safe and are
in compliance with all requirements of
the act (57 FR 22984 at 22985).
FDA has long regarded it to be a
prudent practice for producers who use
biotechnology in the manufacture or
development of foods and food
ingredients to work cooperatively with
FDA to ensure that products derived
through biotechnology are safe and
comply with all applicable legal
requirements. Consequently, FDA
instituted a voluntary consultation
process with industry. The guidance on
Consultation Procedures: From New
Plant Varieties (originally published in
1996 and revised October 1997; the
updated version is available on FDA’s
Web site at https://www.fda.gov/
FoodGuidances) fosters communication
by encouraging developers to submit to
FDA their evaluation of the food safety
of their new plant variety. Such
communication will help to ensure that
7275
any potential food safety issues
regarding a new plant variety are
resolved during development, and will
help to ensure that all market entry
decisions by the industry are made
consistently and in full compliance with
the standards of the act.
Description of Respondents:
Respondents to this collection of
information include developers of new
plant varieties intended for food use.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
Activity
FDA Form No.
No. of
Respondents
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
Total Hours
Initial consultation
None
20
2
40
4
160
Final consultation
FDA 3665
12
1
12
150
1,800
Total
1 There
1,960
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
A. Initial Consultations
Initial consultations are generally a
one-time burden, although a developer
might return more than once to discuss
additional issues before submitting a
final consultation. As noted in its
guidance to industry, FDA encourages
developers to consult early in the
development phase of their products,
and as often as necessary. Historically,
firms developing a new bioengineered
plant variety intended for food use have
generally initiated consultation with
FDA early in the process of developing
such a variety, even though there is no
legal obligation for such consultation.
These consultations have served to
make FDA aware of foods and food
ingredients before these products are
distributed commercially, and have
provided FDA with the information
necessary to address any potential
questions regarding the safety, labeling,
or regulatory status of the food or food
ingredient. As such, these consultations
have provided assistance to both
industry and the agency in exercising
their mutual responsibilities under the
act.
Generally, for an initial consultation,
a developer requests a meeting by
sending FDA a letter with an agenda. A
mutually convenient time is arranged
and the developer comes to discuss
their product. In preparation for a
meeting, a developer might prepare
written materials or a slide presentation
to discuss their product under
development. A meeting between the
developer and FDA typically lasts
between 1 and 2 hours. As a result of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:39 Feb 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
such a meeting, FDA establishes a file
called a biotechnology notification file,
or BNF, to collect all documentation
and communication regarding the
bioengineered plant. For example, FDA
typically places information such as the
developer’s letter, agenda, and any
written materials (such as copies of a
slide presentation) in a BNF, as well as
any memorandum FDA prepares as a
record of the meeting. FDA has not
issued any recommendations as to the
format for these types of materials (e.g.,
there is no form associated with
requesting a meeting).
Depending on the introduced trait, the
experience the developer has had with
the kind of modification being
considered, and their familiarity with
the consultation procedures, a
developer might choose to do a final
consultation without an initial
consultation.
B. Final Consultations
Final consultations are a one-time
burden. At some stage in the process of
research and development, a developer
will have accumulated the information
that the developer believes is adequate
to ensure that food derived from the
new plant variety is safe and that it
demonstrates compliance with the
relevant provisions of the act. The
developer will then be in a position to
conclude any ongoing consultation with
FDA. The developer submits to FDA a
summary of the safety and nutritional
assessment that has been conducted
about the bioengineered food that is
intended to be introduced into
commercial distribution. FDA evaluates
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the submission to ensure that all
potential safety and regulatory questions
have been addressed. FDA has recently
developed a form that prompts a
developer to include certain elements in
the final consultation in a standard
format. New Form FDA 3665 is entitled
‘‘Final Consultation For Food Derived
From a New Plant Variety
(Biotechnology Final Consultation).’’
The form, and elements that would be
prepared as attachments to the form, can
be submitted in electronic format.
The summary information of the
safety and nutritional assessment for a
new plant variety submitted to FDA (on
the form and in attachments to the form)
includes the following information:
• The name of the bioengineered food
and the crop from which it is derived;
• A description of the various
applications or uses of the
bioengineered food, including animal
feed uses;
• Information concerning the sources,
identities, and functions of introduced
genetic material;
• Information on the purpose or
intended technical effect of the
modification, and its expected effect on
the composition or characteristic
properties of the food or feed;
• Information concerning the identity
and function of expression products
encoded by the introduced genetic
material, including an estimate of the
concentration of any expression product
in the bioengineered crop or food
derived therefrom;
• Information regarding any known or
suspected allergenicity and toxicity of
expression products and the basis for
E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM
18FEN1
7276
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 32 / Thursday, February 18, 2010 / Notices
concluding that foods containing the
expression products can be safely
consumed;
• Information comparing the
composition or characteristics of the
bioengineered food to that of food
derived from the parental variety or
other commonly consumed varieties of
the same crop with special emphasis on
important nutrients, and toxicants that
occur naturally in the food;
• A discussion of the available
information that addresses whether the
potential for the food derived from a
bioengineered plant to induce an
allergic response has been altered by the
genetic modification; and
• Any other information relevant to
the safety and nutritional assessment of
the bioengineered food.
In 2001, FDA contacted 5 firms that
had made 1 or more biotechnology
consultation submissions under the
1996 procedures. FDA asked each of
these firms for an estimate of the hourly
burden to prepare a submission under
the voluntary biotechnology
consultation process. Three of these
firms subsequently provided the
requested information. Based on this
information, FDA estimated that the
average time to prepare a submission for
final consultation under the 1996
procedures is 150 hours (69 FR 68379 at
68381). The availability of the form, and
the opportunity to provide the
information in electronic format, could
reduce this estimate. However, as a
conservative approach for the purpose
of this analysis, FDA is assuming that
the availability of the form and the
opportunity to submit the information
in electronic format will have no effect
on the average time to prepare a
submission for final consultation under
the 1996 procedures.
Dated: February 4, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–3028 Filed 2–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0070]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Agreement for
Shipment of Devices for Sterilization
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:37 Feb 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
information collection requirements
relating to shipment of nonsterile
devices that are to be sterilized
elsewhere or are shipped to other
establishments for further processing,
labeling, or repacking.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by April 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Gittleson, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–
400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–
5156, Daniel.Gittleson@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined in
44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c)
and includes agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal agencies
to provide a 60-day notice in the
Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information before
submitting the collection to OMB for
approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Agreement for Shipment of Devices for
Sterilization—21 CFR 801.150(e) (OMB
Control Number 0910–0131)—Extension
Under sections 501(c) and 502(a) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 351(c) and
352(a)), nonsterile devices that are
labeled as sterile but are in interstate
transit to a facility to be sterilized are
adulterated and misbranded. FDA
regulations in § 801.150(e) (21 CFR
801.150(e)) establish a control
mechanism by which firms may
manufacture and label medical devices
as sterile at one establishment and ship
the devices in interstate commerce for
sterilization at another establishment, a
practice that facilitates the processing of
devices and is economically necessary
for some firms. Under § 801.150(e)(1),
manufacturers and sterilizers may sign
an agreement containing the following:
(1) Instructions for maintaining
accountability of the number of units in
each shipment; (2) acknowledgment that
the devices that are nonsterile are being
shipped for further processing; and (3)
specifications for sterilization
processing.
This agreement allows the
manufacturer to ship misbranded
products to be sterilized without
initiating regulatory action and provides
FDA with a means to protect consumers
from use of nonsterile products.
During routine plant inspections, FDA
normally reviews agreements that must
be kept for 2 years after final shipment
or delivery of devices (§ 801.150(a)(2)).
The respondents to this collection of
information are device manufacturers
and contact sterilizers.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM
18FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7274-7276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3028]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2004-N-0390] (formerly Docket No. 2004N-0503)
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived
From New Plant Varieties
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information and
to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This
notice solicits comments on the information collection provisions of
FDA's consultation procedures for foods derived from new plant
varieties, including the information collection provisions in the
guidance entitled ``Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New
Plant Varieties,'' and in Form FDA 3665 entitled ``Final Consultation
For Food Derived From a New Plant Variety (Biotechnology Final
Consultation),'' which developers may use to prepare the final
consultation in a standard format.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the collection of
information by April 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3793.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information before
submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology. In the Federal
Register of November 24, 2004 (69 FR 68379), FDA published a previous
60-day notice requesting public comment on this proposed collection of
information. FDA is publishing this notice to update comments. Comments
previously submitted to the Division of Dockets Management do not need
to be resubmitted because all such comments that are responsive to the
comment request will be summarized and responded to in the Information
Collection Request, i.e. 30-day notice, submitted to OMB.
Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant
Varieties
Since 1992, when FDA issued its Statement of Policy: Foods Derived
from New Plant Varieties (the 1992 policy) (57 FR 22984, May 29, 1992),
FDA has encouraged developers of new plant varieties, including those
varieties that are developed through biotechnology, to consult with FDA
during the plant development process to discuss possible scientific and
regulatory issues that might arise. In the 1992 policy, FDA explained
that, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act),
developers of new foods (in this
[[Page 7275]]
document food refers to both human food and animal feed) have a
responsibility to ensure that the foods they offer to consumers are
safe and are in compliance with all requirements of the act (57 FR
22984 at 22985).
FDA has long regarded it to be a prudent practice for producers who
use biotechnology in the manufacture or development of foods and food
ingredients to work cooperatively with FDA to ensure that products
derived through biotechnology are safe and comply with all applicable
legal requirements. Consequently, FDA instituted a voluntary
consultation process with industry. The guidance on Consultation
Procedures: From New Plant Varieties (originally published in 1996 and
revised October 1997; the updated version is available on FDA's Web
site at https://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances) fosters communication by
encouraging developers to submit to FDA their evaluation of the food
safety of their new plant variety. Such communication will help to
ensure that any potential food safety issues regarding a new plant
variety are resolved during development, and will help to ensure that
all market entry decisions by the industry are made consistently and in
full compliance with the standards of the act.
Description of Respondents: Respondents to this collection of
information include developers of new plant varieties intended for food
use.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA
Activity Form No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per Total Hours
No. Respondents per Response Responses Response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial None 20 2 40 4 160
consultat
ion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final FDA 12 1 12 150 1,800
consultat 3665
ion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 1,960
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
A. Initial Consultations
Initial consultations are generally a one-time burden, although a
developer might return more than once to discuss additional issues
before submitting a final consultation. As noted in its guidance to
industry, FDA encourages developers to consult early in the development
phase of their products, and as often as necessary. Historically, firms
developing a new bioengineered plant variety intended for food use have
generally initiated consultation with FDA early in the process of
developing such a variety, even though there is no legal obligation for
such consultation. These consultations have served to make FDA aware of
foods and food ingredients before these products are distributed
commercially, and have provided FDA with the information necessary to
address any potential questions regarding the safety, labeling, or
regulatory status of the food or food ingredient. As such, these
consultations have provided assistance to both industry and the agency
in exercising their mutual responsibilities under the act.
Generally, for an initial consultation, a developer requests a
meeting by sending FDA a letter with an agenda. A mutually convenient
time is arranged and the developer comes to discuss their product. In
preparation for a meeting, a developer might prepare written materials
or a slide presentation to discuss their product under development. A
meeting between the developer and FDA typically lasts between 1 and 2
hours. As a result of such a meeting, FDA establishes a file called a
biotechnology notification file, or BNF, to collect all documentation
and communication regarding the bioengineered plant. For example, FDA
typically places information such as the developer's letter, agenda,
and any written materials (such as copies of a slide presentation) in a
BNF, as well as any memorandum FDA prepares as a record of the meeting.
FDA has not issued any recommendations as to the format for these types
of materials (e.g., there is no form associated with requesting a
meeting).
Depending on the introduced trait, the experience the developer has
had with the kind of modification being considered, and their
familiarity with the consultation procedures, a developer might choose
to do a final consultation without an initial consultation.
B. Final Consultations
Final consultations are a one-time burden. At some stage in the
process of research and development, a developer will have accumulated
the information that the developer believes is adequate to ensure that
food derived from the new plant variety is safe and that it
demonstrates compliance with the relevant provisions of the act. The
developer will then be in a position to conclude any ongoing
consultation with FDA. The developer submits to FDA a summary of the
safety and nutritional assessment that has been conducted about the
bioengineered food that is intended to be introduced into commercial
distribution. FDA evaluates the submission to ensure that all potential
safety and regulatory questions have been addressed. FDA has recently
developed a form that prompts a developer to include certain elements
in the final consultation in a standard format. New Form FDA 3665 is
entitled ``Final Consultation For Food Derived From a New Plant Variety
(Biotechnology Final Consultation).'' The form, and elements that would
be prepared as attachments to the form, can be submitted in electronic
format.
The summary information of the safety and nutritional assessment
for a new plant variety submitted to FDA (on the form and in
attachments to the form) includes the following information:
The name of the bioengineered food and the crop from which
it is derived;
A description of the various applications or uses of the
bioengineered food, including animal feed uses;
Information concerning the sources, identities, and
functions of introduced genetic material;
Information on the purpose or intended technical effect of
the modification, and its expected effect on the composition or
characteristic properties of the food or feed;
Information concerning the identity and function of
expression products encoded by the introduced genetic material,
including an estimate of the concentration of any expression product in
the bioengineered crop or food derived therefrom;
Information regarding any known or suspected allergenicity
and toxicity of expression products and the basis for
[[Page 7276]]
concluding that foods containing the expression products can be safely
consumed;
Information comparing the composition or characteristics
of the bioengineered food to that of food derived from the parental
variety or other commonly consumed varieties of the same crop with
special emphasis on important nutrients, and toxicants that occur
naturally in the food;
A discussion of the available information that addresses
whether the potential for the food derived from a bioengineered plant
to induce an allergic response has been altered by the genetic
modification; and
Any other information relevant to the safety and
nutritional assessment of the bioengineered food.
In 2001, FDA contacted 5 firms that had made 1 or more
biotechnology consultation submissions under the 1996 procedures. FDA
asked each of these firms for an estimate of the hourly burden to
prepare a submission under the voluntary biotechnology consultation
process. Three of these firms subsequently provided the requested
information. Based on this information, FDA estimated that the average
time to prepare a submission for final consultation under the 1996
procedures is 150 hours (69 FR 68379 at 68381). The availability of the
form, and the opportunity to provide the information in electronic
format, could reduce this estimate. However, as a conservative approach
for the purpose of this analysis, FDA is assuming that the availability
of the form and the opportunity to submit the information in electronic
format will have no effect on the average time to prepare a submission
for final consultation under the 1996 procedures.
Dated: February 4, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-3028 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S