FTA Fiscal Year 2010 Apportionments, Allocations, and Program Information, 7048-7147 [2010-2996]
Download as PDF
7048
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
FTA Fiscal Year 2010 Apportionments,
Allocations, and Program Information
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) annually
publishes one or more notices
apportioning funds appropriated by law.
In some cases, if less than a full year of
funds is available, FTA publishes
multiple partial apportionment notices.
This notice is the first notice
announcing partial apportionment of
Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 formula and
discretionary funds. It also provides
program guidance and requirements;
and provides information on several
program issues important in the current
fiscal year. The notice also includes
tables that show certain discretionary
programs unobligated (carryover)
funding from previous years that will be
available for obligation during FY 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information about this notice
contact Henrika Buchanan-Smith,
Director, Office of Transit Programs, at
(202) 366–2053. Please contact the
appropriate FTA regional office for any
specific requests for information or
technical assistance. The Appendix at
the end of this notice includes contact
information for FTA regional offices. An
FTA headquarters contact for each
major program area is included in the
discussion of that program in the text of
the notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Table of Contents
I. Overview
II. FY 2010 Available Funding for FTA
Programs
A. Available Funding Based on Continuing
Appropriations Resolution 2010, and
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU) and the
Transportation, Housing and Urban
Development, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act 2010
B. Program Funds Set-aside for Oversight
III. FY 2010 FTA Key Program Initiatives and
Changes
A. SAFETEA–LU Implementation
B. Planning Emphasis Areas
C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant
Opportunities
D. Flexible Funding Procedures
E. Match for Biodiesel Vehicles and Hybrid
Retrofits
IV. FTA Programs
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49
U.S.C. 5305)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
B. Statewide Planning and Research
Program (49 U.S.C. 5305)
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49
U.S.C. 5307)
D. Clean Fuels Formula Program (49 U.S.C.
5308)
E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C.
5309)—Fixed Guideway Modernization
F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C.
5309)—Bus and Bus-Related Facilities
G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C.
5309)—New Starts and Small Starts
H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals
and Individuals With Disabilities
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49
U.S.C. 5311)
J. Rural Transportation Assistance Program
(49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3))
K. Public Transportation on Indian
Reservation Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(c))
L. National Research Program (49 U.S.C.
5314)
M. Job Access and Reverse Commute
Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317)
O. Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks
Program (49 U.S.C. 5320)
P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49
U.S.C. 5339)
Q. Growing States and High Density States
Formula (49 U.S.C. 5340)
R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 note)
S. Grants for Energy Efficiency and
Greenhouse Gas Reduction (TIGGER)
Program
T. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
Authority Grants
V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY 2010
Grants Requirements
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority to
Incur Project Costs
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
C. FTA FY 2010 Annual List of
Certifications and Assurances
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes
E. Grant Application Procedures
F. Payments
G. Oversight
H. Technical Assistance
Tables
1. FTA FY 2010 Appropriations and
Apportionments for Grant Programs
2. FTA FY 2010 Metropolitan Planning
Program and Statewide Planning and
Research Program Apportionments
3. FTA FY 2010 Section 5307 and Section
5340 Urbanized Area Apportionments
3–A. 2000 Census Urbanized Areas
200,000 or More in Population Eligible to
Use Section 5307 Funds for Operating
Assistance.
4. FTA FY 2010 Section 5307
Apportionment Formula
5. FTA FY 2010 Formula Programs
Apportionments Data Unit Values
6. FTA FY 2010 Small Transit Intensive
Cities Performance Data and
Apportionments
7. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section
5308 Clean Fuels Allocations
8. FTA FY 2010 Section 5309 Fixed
Guideway Modernization
Apportionments
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
9. FTA FY 2010 Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program Apportionment
Formula
10. FTA FY 2010 Section 5309 Buses and
Bus Related Equipment and Facilities
Allocations
10–A. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section
5309 Buses and Bus Related Equipment
and Facilities Allocations
10–B. FTA FY 2010 Section 5309 Buses
and Bus Related Equipment and
Facilities Extended and Reprogrammed
Earmarks
11. FTA FY 2010 Section 5309 New Starts
Allocations
12. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section
5309 New Starts Allocations
13. FTA FY 2010 Special Needs For
Elderly Individuals and Individuals With
Disabilities Apportionments
14. FTA FY 2010 Section 5311 and Section
5340 Nonurbanized Area Formula
Apportionments, and Rural
Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP) Allocations
15. FTA Prior Unobligated Tribal Transit
Discretionary Allocations
16. FTA FY 2010 Section 5316 Job Access
and Reverse Commute (JARC)
Apportionments
17. FTA Prior Unobligated Discretionary
JARC Allocations
18. FTA FY 2010 Section 5317 New
Freedom Apportionments
19. FTA FY 2010 Section 5339 Alternatives
Analysis Allocations
20. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section
5339 Alternatives Analysis Allocations
Appendix
I. Overview
FTA’s current authorization, the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient,
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU), expired
September 30, 2009. Since that time,
Congress has enacted short term
extensions allowing FTA to continue its
current programs. The Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2010, as
amended, (Pub. L. 111–68, Div. B),
continues the authorization of the
Federal transit programs of the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT)
through February 28, 2010. It extends
contract authority for the Formula and
Bus Grants programs at the same levels
that were available under the Omnibus
Appropriations, 2009 (Pub. L. 111–8,
Div. I) until February 28, 2010, i.e.,
approximately 5⁄12th of the contract
authority available in fiscal year (FY)
2009. Additionally, Division A of the
Transportation, Housing and Urban
Development, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act 2010 (Pub. L. 111–
68), which was signed into law by
President Obama on December 16, 2009,
appropriated funds for FTA generalfunded programs for FY 2010. This
notice provides information on funding
amounts that are currently available for
FTA assistance programs.
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
This document apportions or allocates
available FY 2010 funds that were made
available under Division A of the
Transportation, Housing and Urban
Development, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act 2010 hereinafter,
(‘‘Appropriations Act, 2010’’) and the
Continuing Appropriations Resolution,
2010, as amended, hereinafter, (‘‘CR,
2010’’) among potential program
recipients according to statutory
formulas in 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 and
existing Full Funding Grant
Agreements. The notice includes FY
2010 formula and section 5309 bus
category funds that are currently
available, which is approximately 5⁄12 or
41% of the amounts that were available
under the Omnibus Appropriations Act,
2009. The notice does not include any
extension or reprogramming of any
discretionary funds that lapsed to the
designated project as of September 30,
2009. FTA will issue a supplemental
notice at a later date for any additional
increments of formula and discretionary
funds that become available.
For each FTA program included in
this notice, we have provided relevant
information on the FY 2010 funding
currently available, program
requirements, period of availability, and
other related program information and
highlights, as appropriate. A separate
section of the document provides
information on program requirements
and guidance that are applicable to all
FTA programs.
II. FY 2010 Funding for FTA Programs
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
A. Funding Based on the
Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L.) and
CR, 2010
The Appropriations Act, 2010 provide
general funds and obligation authority
trust funds from the Mass Transit
Account (MTA) of the Highway trust
fund that total $4.1 billion for FTA
programs. The CR 2010 makes available
5⁄12ths of the contract authority level
provided in FY 2009 for the Formula
and Section 5309 Bus programs. Table
1 of this document shows the funding
that is currently available for the FTA
programs. All Formula Programs and
the Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities Program are funded entirely
from MTA of the Highway Trust Fund
in FY 2010. The Section 5309 New
Starts Program, the Research Program,
Washington Metropolitan Transit
Authority, Transit Investments for
Greenhouse Gas and Energy Reduction
(TIGGER) Program and FTA
administrative expenses are funded by
appropriations from the General Fund of
the Treasury.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
This Federal Register notice includes
tables of apportionments and allocations
for FTA formula programs based on the
Appropriations Act, 2010 and the CR,
2010. Additionally, discretionary
funding under the New Starts, Bus and
Bus facilities, Alternative Analysis and
the Washington Metropolitan Transit
Authority Programs that were allocated
in the Appropriations Act, 2010 are also
included.
B. Program Funds Set-Aside for Project
Management Oversight
As background, Section 5327 of title
49 U.S.C., authorizes the takedown of
funds from FTA programs for project
management oversight. Section 5327
provides oversight takedowns at the
following levels: 0.5 percent of Planning
funds, 0.75 percent of Urbanized Area
Formula funds, 1 percent of Capital
Investment funds, 0.5 percent of Special
Needs of Elderly Individuals and
Individuals with Disabilities formula
funds, 0.5 percent of Non-urbanized
Area Formula funds, and 0.5 percent of
the Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in the Parks
Program funds (formerly the Alternative
Transportation in the Parks and Public
Lands Program).
The funds are used to provide
necessary oversight activities, including
oversight of the construction of any
major capital project under these
statutory programs; to conduct State
Safety Oversight, drug and alcohol, civil
rights, procurement systems,
management, planning certification and,
financial reviews and audits, as well as
evaluations and analyses of grantee
specific problems and issues; and to
provide technical assistance to correct
deficiencies identified in compliance
reviews and audits.
III. FY 2010 FTA Program Initiatives
and Changes
A. Binding Guidance or Policy
Documents
Before any requirements placing
binding obligations on grantees are
finalized, FTA will publish and make
them available for public comment. We
encourage grantees to regularly check
the FTA Web site at https://
www.fta.dot.gov and the U.S.
Government docket management Web
site at https://regulations.gov for new
issuances and to comment to the docket
established for each document on
relevant issues.
B. Planning Emphasis Areas—Planning
for Sustainable Communities
FTA and the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) periodically
identify Planning Emphasis Areas
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
7049
(PEAs) to promote priority themes for
consideration, as appropriate, in
metropolitan and statewide
transportation planning processes. For
FY 2010, ‘‘planning for sustainable
communities’’ has been identified as the
emphasis area. To support effective
practice and capacity-building on this
topic, FTA and FHWA will prepare and
distribute an inventory of current
practice, guidance, and training and
offer targeted technical assistance.
Opportunities for peer exchange of ideas
and experiences on innovative practice
on the topic will be provided
throughout the year.
For further information on this
emphasis area, contact Jeff Price, FTA
Office of Systems Planning, (202) 366–
4280.
C. Livability
FTA fosters livable communities and
sustainable development through its
various transit programs and activities.
Public transportation supports the
development of communities, providing
effective and reliable transportation
alternatives that increase access to jobs,
health and social services,
entertainment, educational
opportunities, and other activities of
daily life, while also improving mobility
within and among these communities.
Through various initiatives and
legislative changes over the last fifteen
years, FTA has allowed and encouraged
projects that help integrate transit into
a community through neighborhood
improvements and enhancements to
transit facilities or services, or make
improvements to areas adjacent to
public transit facilities that may
facilitate mobility demands of transit
users or support other infrastructure
investments that enhance the use of
transit for the community.
On June 16, 2009, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) Secretary Ray
LaHood, U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD)
Secretary Shaun Donovan, and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Administrator Lisa Jackson announced a
new interagency partnership to help
improve access to affordable housing,
more transportation options, and lower
transportation costs, while protecting
the environment. The three agencies are
coordinating Federal transportation,
environmental protection, and housing
investments at their respective agencies
to support sustainable communities for
American families in rural, suburban
and urban areas.
During FY 2010, FTA will implement
the Livability Bus and Urban Circulator
Programs, which will result in a
minimum of $280 million in funding for
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7050
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
projects that demonstrate livability
principles by providing more
transportation choices; enhancing
economic competitiveness; enhancing
existing communities; coordinating
policies and leveraging investments;
and valuing communities and
neighborhoods.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
D. Flexible Funding Procedures
Flexible funding was one of the
hallmarks of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
(ISTEA) that was continued to the
present day. Flexible funding provisions
enable State and local governments,
transit operators, and metropolitan
planning organizations to more
effectively meet their unique needs, and
facilitate a multimodal approach to
meeting transportation needs at both the
statewide and metropolitan levels. The
statutory flexibility provisions include:
1. Broad highway/transit spending
eligibility within selected categories of
major highway and transit programs;
2. Allowance of the transfer of funds
within the Federal-aid highway program
to other programs with broader
highway/transit eligibility; and
3. Allowance of the transfer of funds
from FHWA to FTA, and vice versa.
Obligation authority for flexible
funds, high priority projects and other
transit projects in Title 23 U.S.C., is
transferred to FTA when States and
local agencies determine that FTA will
administer the public transportation
project. The liquidating cash, however,
is transferred between Federal accounts
only as needed to ensure that adequate
funds are available for disbursement on
a timely basis. In order to track the cash
flow more closely, FTA no longer
combines funds transferred from FHWA
into a single grant with FTA funds in
the program to which they are
transferred. FTA has established codes
and procedures for grants involving
funds transferred from FHWA. Grantees
can contact the appropriate regional
office for funding assistance.
E. Changes in Match for Biodiesel
Vehicles and Hybrid Retrofits
Section 164 of the Appropriations Act
2010, provides that any grant for a
project that involves the acquisition or
rehabilitation of a bus to be used in
public transportation shall be funded at
90 percent Federal share for the net
capital costs of a biodiesel bus or a
factory-installed or retrofitted hybrid
electric propulsion system and any
equipment related to such a system.
This increased Federal share is a crosscutting provision and is applicable
across FTA programs for any grants
awarded during FY 2010 regardless of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
what fiscal year funding is used.
Grantees may apply for a 90 percent
Federal share for the entire cost of a
biodiesel bus, but only for the cost of
the propulsion system and related
equipment in the case of the hybrid
electric systems, not for 90 percent of
the cost of the entire vehicle. In lieu of
calculating the costs of the hybrid
electric propulsion system separately,
grantees may apply for 83 percent of the
cost of the vehicle.
IV. FTA Programs
This section of the notice provides the
available FY 2010 funding to date and/
or other important program-related
information for 19 separate FTA
programs that are contained in this
notice. Funding for eleven programs is
apportioned by statutory or
administrative formula. Funding for the
other eight programs will be allocated
on a discretionary or competitive basis.
Funding and/or other important
information for each of the 19 programs
is presented immediately below. This
includes program apportionments or
allocations, certain program
requirements, length of time FY 2010
funding is available for obligation and
other significant program information
pertaining to FY 2010.
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49
U.S.C. 5305(d))
Section 5305(d) authorizes Federal
funding to support a cooperative,
continuous, and comprehensive
planning program for transportation
investment decision-making at the
metropolitan area level. The specific
requirements of metropolitan
transportation planning are set forth in
49 U.S.C. 5303 and further explained in
23 CFR part 450, as incorporated by
reference in 49 CFR part 613, Statewide
Transportation Planning; Metropolitan
Transportation Planning; Final Rule.
State Departments of Transportation are
direct recipients of funds allocated by
FTA, which are then suballocated to
Metropolitan Planning Organizations
(MPOs) by formula, for planning
activities that support the economic
vitality of the metropolitan area,
especially by enabling global
competitiveness, productivity, and
efficiency; increasing the safety and
security of the transportation system for
motorized and non-motorized users;
increasing the accessibility and mobility
options available to people and for
freight; protecting and enhancing the
environment, promoting energy
conservation, and improving quality of
life; enhancing the integration and
connectivity of the transportation
system, across and between modes, for
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
people and freight; promoting efficient
transportation system management and
operation; and emphasizing the
preservation of the existing
transportation system. This funding
must support work elements and
activities resulting in balanced and
comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the
movement of people and goods in the
metropolitan area. Comprehensive
transportation planning is not limited to
transit planning or surface
transportation planning, but also
encompasses the relationships among
land use and all transportation modes,
without regard to the programmatic
source of Federal assistance. Eligible
work elements or activities include, but
are not limited to studies relating to
management, mobility management,
planning, operations, capital
requirements, and economic feasibility;
evaluation of previously funded
projects; peer reviews and exchanges of
technical data, information, assistance,
and related activities in support of
planning and environmental analysis
among MPOs and other transportation
planners; work elements and related
activities preliminary to and in
preparation for constructing, acquiring,
or improving the operation of facilities
and equipment; development of
coordinated public transit human
services transportation plans. An
exhaustive list of eligible work activities
is provided in FTA Circular 8100.1C,
Program Guidance for Metropolitan
Planning and State Planning and
Research Program Grants, dated
September 1, 2008. For more about the
Metropolitan Planning Program and the
FTA Circular 8100.1C, contact James
Garland, Office of Planning and
Environment at (202) 366–0526.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $38,841,000 to the
Metropolitan Planning Program (49
U.S.C. 5305(d) to support metropolitan
transportation planning activities set
forth in 49 U.S.C. 5303. The total
amount apportioned for the
Metropolitan Planning Program to States
for MPOs’ use in urbanized areas
(UZAs) is $38,646,795, as shown in the
table below, after the deduction for
oversight.
METROPOLITAN PLANNING PROGRAM
Total Appropriation ...............
Oversight Deduction .............
$38,841,000
¥$194,205
Total Apportioned ..............
$38,646,795
States’ apportionments for this
program are displayed in Table 2
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
2. Basis for Formula Apportionments.
As specified in law, 82.72 percent of
the amounts authorized for Section 5305
are allocated to the Metropolitan
Planning program. FTA allocates
Metropolitan Planning funds to the
States according to a statutory formula.
Eighty percent of the funds are
distributed to the States as a basic
allocation based on each State’s UZA
population, based on the most recent
decennial Census. The remaining 20
percent is provided to the States as a
supplemental allocation based on an
FTA administrative formula to address
planning needs in the larger, more
complex UZAs. The amount published
for each State is a combined total of
both the basic and supplemental
allocation.
3. Program Requirements
The State allocates Metropolitan
Planning funds to MPOs in UZAs or
portions thereof to provide funds for
projects included in an annual work
program (the Unified Planning Work
Program, or UPWP) that includes both
highway and transit planning projects.
Each State has either reaffirmed or
developed, in consultation with their
MPOs, an allocation formula, based on
the 2000 Census. The State allocation
formula may be changed annually, but
any change requires approval by the
FTA regional office before grant
approval. Program guidance for the
Metropolitan Planning Program is found
in FTA Circular 8100.1C, Program
Guidance for Metropolitan Planning and
State Planning and Research Program
Grants, dated September 1, 2008. For
more about the Metropolitan Planning
Program and the FTA Circular 8100.1C,
contact James Garland of the Office of
Planning and Environment at (202) 366–
0526.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the
Metropolitan Planning program to each
State remain available for obligation by
FTA to recipients for four fiscal years—
which includes the year of
apportionment plus three additional
years. Any apportioned funds that
remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2013, will
revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the Metropolitan Planning
Program.
5. Consolidated Planning Grants
FTA and FHWA planning funds
under both the Metropolitan Planning
and State Planning and Research
Programs can be consolidated into a
single consolidated planning grant
(CPG), awarded by either FTA or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
FHWA. The CPG eliminates the need to
monitor individual fund sources, if
several have been used, and ensures that
the oldest funds will always be used
first. Unlike ‘‘flex funds’’ for capital
programs, planning funds from FHWA
may be combined with FTA planning
funds in a single grant. Alternatively,
FTA planning funds may be transferred
to FHWA to be administered as
combined grants.
Under the CPG, States can report
metropolitan planning program
expenditures (to comply with the Single
Audit Act) for both FTA and FHWA
under the Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance number for FTA’s
Metropolitan Planning Program
(20.505). Additionally, for States with
an FHWA Metropolitan Planning (PL)
fund-matching ratio greater than 80
percent, the State can waive the 20
percent local share requirement, with
FTA’s concurrence, to allow FTA funds
used for metropolitan planning in a CPG
to be granted at the higher FHWA rate.
For some States, this Federal match rate
can exceed 90 percent.
States interested in transferring
planning funds between FTA and
FHWA should contact the FTA Regional
Office or FHWA Division Office for
more detailed procedures. Current
guidelines are included in Federal
Highway Administration Memorandum
dated July 12, 2007, ‘‘Information: Final
Transfers to Other Agencies that
Administer Title 23 Programs.’’
For further information on CPGs,
contact Nancy Grubb, Office of Budget
and Policy, FTA, at (202) 366–1635.
B. State Planning and Research Program
(49 U.S.C. 5305(e))
This program provides financial
assistance to States for Statewide
transportation planning and other
technical assistance activities, including
supplementing the technical assistance
program provided through the
Metropolitan Planning program. The
specific requirements of Statewide
transportation planning are set forth in
49 U.S.C. 5304 and further explained in
23 CFR part 450 as referenced in 49 CFR
part 613, Statewide Transportation
Planning; Metropolitan Transportation
Planning; Final Rule. This funding must
support work elements and activities
resulting in balanced and
comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the
movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning
is not limited to transit planning or
surface transportation planning, but also
encompasses the relationships among
land use and all transportation modes,
without regard to the programmatic
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
7051
source of Federal assistance. For more
information, contact James Garland of
the Office of Planning and Environment
at (202) 366–0526.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $8,114,000 to the
State Planning and Research Program
(49 U.S.C. 5305). The total amount
apportioned for the State Planning and
Research Program (SPRP) is $8,073,430
as shown in the table below, after the
deduction for oversight (authorized by
49 U.S.C. 5327).
STATE PLANNING AND RESEARCH
PROGRAM
Total Appropriation ...............
Oversight Deduction .............
$8,114,000
¥$40,570
Total Apportioned ..............
$8,073,430
State apportionments for this program
are displayed in Table 2.
2. Basis for Apportionment Formula
As specified in law, 17.28 percent of
the amounts authorized for Section 5305
are allocated to the State Planning and
Research program. FTA apportions
funds to States by a statutory formula
that is based on the most recent
decennial Census, and the State’s UZA
population as compared to the UZA
population of all States.
3. Requirements
Funds are provided to States for
Statewide transportation planning
programs. These funds may be used for
a variety of purposes such as planning,
technical studies and assistance,
demonstrations, and management
training. In addition, a State may
authorize a portion of these funds to be
used to supplement Metropolitan
Planning funds allocated by the State to
its UZAs, as the State deems
appropriate. Program guidance for the
State Planning and Research program is
found in FTA Circular 8100.1C. This
funding must support work elements
and activities resulting in balanced and
comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the
movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning
is not limited to transit planning or
surface transportation planning, but also
encompasses the relationships among
land use and all transportation modes,
without regard to the programmatic
source of Federal assistance. Eligible
work elements or activities include, but
are not limited to studies relating to
management, planning, operations,
capital requirements, and economic
feasibility; evaluation of previously
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7052
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
funded projects; peer reviews and
exchanges of technical data,
information, assistance, and related
activities in support of planning and
environmental analysis; work elements
and related activities preliminary to and
in preparation for constructing,
acquiring, or improving the operation of
facilities and equipment. An exhaustive
list of eligible work activities is
provided in FTA Circular 8100.1C,
Program Guidance for Metropolitan
Planning and State Planning and
Research Program Grants, dated
September 1, 2008. For more
information, contact James Garland of
the Office of Planning and Environment
at (202) 366–0526.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the
State Planning and Research program to
each State remain available for
obligation for four fiscal years—which
include the year of apportionment plus
three additional fiscal years. Any
apportioned funds that remain
unobligated at the close of business on
September 30, 2013, will revert to FTA
for reapportionment under the State
Planning and Research Program.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
See Section A.5 of this notice for
information about Planning Emphasis
Areas and Consolidated Planning
Grants.
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49
U.S.C. 5307)
Section 5307 authorizes Federal
capital assistance, and in some cases,
operating assistance for public
transportation in UZAs. A UZA is an
area with a population of 50,000 or
more that has been defined and
designated as such in the 2000 Census
by the U.S. Census Bureau. The
Urbanized Area Formula Program funds
may also be used to support planning
activities, and may supplement
planning projects funded under the
Metropolitan Planning program.
Urbanized Areas Formula Program
funds used for planning must be shown
in the Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP) for MPO(s) with responsibility
for that area. Funding is apportioned
directly to each UZA with a population
of 200,000 or more, and to the State
Governors for UZAs with populations
between 50,000 and 200,000. Eligible
applicants are limited to entities
designated as recipients in accordance
with 49 U.S.C. 5307(a)(2) and other
public entities with the consent of the
Designated Recipient. Generally,
operating assistance is not an eligible
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
expense for UZAs with populations of
200,000 or more. However, there are
several exceptions to this restriction.
The exceptions are described in section
3(d)(5) below.
For more information about the
Urbanized Area Formula Program
contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–1660.
calculate the apportionment for the
Anchorage, Alaska UZA.
FTA has calculated dollar unit values
for the formula factors used in the
Urbanized Area Formula Program
apportionment calculations. These
values represent the amount of money
each unit of a factor is worth in this
year’s apportionment. The unit values
change each year, based on all of the
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
data used to calculate the
apportionments. The dollar unit values
CR 2010 provides $1,721,140,000 to
for FY 2010 are displayed in Table 5. To
the Urbanized Area Formula Program
replicate the basic formula component
(49 U.S.C. 5307). The total amount
of a UZA’s apportionment, multiply the
apportioned for the Urbanized Area
dollar unit value by the appropriate
Formula Program is $1,870,317,082 as
formula factor (i.e., the population,
shown in the table below, after the 0.75
population × population density), and
percent deduction for oversight
when applicable, data from the NTD
(authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5327) and
(i.e., route miles, vehicle revenue miles,
including funds apportioned to UZAs
from the appropriation for Section 5340 passenger miles, and operating cost).
In FY 2010, one percent of funds
for Growing States and High Density
appropriated for Section 5307, or
States.
$17,211,000 based on CR 2010 is set
URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM aside for Small Transit Intensive Cities
(STIC). FTA apportions these funds to
Total Appropriation ........... a $1,721,140,000 UZAs under 200,000 in population that
Oversight Deduction .........
¥$12,908,550 operate at a level of service equal to or
above the industry average level of
Section 5340 Funds
Added ............................
$162,085,632 service for all UZAs with a population
of at least 200,000, but not more than
Total Apportioned ..........
$1,870,317,082 999,999, in one or more of six
performance categories: passenger miles
a One percent set-aside for Small Transit Intraveled per vehicle revenue mile,
tensive Cities Formula.
passenger miles traveled per vehicle
Table 3 displays the amounts
revenue hour, vehicle revenue miles per
apportioned under the Urbanized Area
capita, vehicle revenue hours per capita,
Formula Program.
passenger miles traveled per capita, and
passengers per capita.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
The data for these categories for the
FTA apportions Urbanized Area
purpose of FY 2010 apportionments
Formula Program funds based on
comes from the NTD reports for the
legislative formulas. Different formulas
2008 reporting year. This data is used to
apply to UZAs with populations of
determine a UZA’s eligibility under the
200,000 or more and to UZAs with
STIC formula, and is also used in the
populations less than 200,000. For
STIC apportionment calculations.
UZAs with 50,000 to 199,999 in
Because these performance data change
population, the formula is based solely
with each year’s NTD reports, the UZAs
on population and population density.
eligible for STIC funds and the amount
For UZAs with populations of 200,000
each receives may vary each year. In FY
and more, the formula is based on a
2010, FTA apportioned $56,826 for each
combination of bus revenue vehicle
performance factor/category for which
miles, bus passenger miles, fixed
the urbanized area exceeded the
guideway revenue vehicle miles, and
national average for UZAs with a
fixed guideway route miles, as well as
population of at least 200,000 but not
population and population density.
more than 999,999.
Table 4 includes detailed information
In addition to the funds apportioned
about the formulas.
to UZAs, according to the Section 5307
To calculate a UZA’s FY 2010
formula factors contained in 49 U.S.C.
apportionment, FTA used population
5336, FTA also apportions funds to
and population density statistics from
urbanized areas under Section 5340
the 2000 Census and (when applicable)
Growing States and High Density States
validated mileage and transit service
formula factors. In FY 2010, FTA
data from transit providers’ 2008
apportions $65,900,632 to UZAs in
National Transit Database (NTD) Report growing States and $96,185,000 to UZAs
Year. Consistent with 49 U.S.C. 5336(b), in High Density States. Half of the funds
FTA used 60 percent of the directional
appropriated for Section 5340 are
route miles attributable to the Alaska
available to Growing States and half to
Railroad passenger operations system to High Density States. FTA apportions
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
Growing States funds by a formula
based on State population forecasts for
15 years beyond the most recent Census.
FTA distributes the amounts
apportioned for each State between
UZAs and nonurbanized areas based on
the ratio of urbanized/nonurbanized
population within each State in the
2000 census, and to UZAs
proportionately based on UZA
population in the 2000 census (because
population estimates are not available at
the UZA level). FTA apportions the
High Density States funds to States with
population densities in excess of 370
persons per square mile. These funds
are apportioned only to UZAs within
those States. FTA pro-rates each UZA’s
share of the High Density funds based
on the population of the UZAs in the
State in the 2000 census.
FTA cannot provide unit values for
the Growing States or High Density
formulas because the allocations to
individual States and urbanized areas
are based on their relative population
data, rather than on a national per capita
basis.
Based on language in the conference
report accompanying SAFETEA–LU,
FTA is to show a single apportionment
amount for Section 5307, STIC and
Section 5340. FTA shows a single
Section 5307 apportionment amount for
each UZA in Table 3, the Urbanized
Area Formula apportionments. The
amount includes funds apportioned
based on the Section 5307 formula
factors, any STIC funds, and any
Growing States and High Density States
funding allocated to the area. FTA uses
separate formulas to calculate and
generate the respective apportionment
amounts for the Section 5307, STIC and
Section 5340. For technical assistance
purposes, the UZAs that received STIC
funds are listed in Table 6. FTA will
make available breakouts of the funding
allocated to each UZA under these
formulas, upon request to the regional
office.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
3. Program Requirements
Program guidance for the Urbanized
Area Formula Program is currently
found in FTA Circular 9030.1C,
Urbanized Area Formula Program: Grant
Application Instructions, dated October
1, 1998, and supplemented by
additional information or changes
provided in this document. FTA is in
the process of updating the circular. The
public comment period on the proposed
circular closed on November 30, 2009.
FTA anticipates publishing the final
circular by March 31, 2010. Several
important program requirements are
highlighted below.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
a. Urbanized Area Formula
Apportionments to Governors
For small UZAs, those with a
population of less than 200,000, FTA
apportions funds to the Governor of
each State for distribution. A single total
Governor’s apportionment amount for
the Urbanized Area Formula, STIC, and
Growing States and High Density States
is shown in the Urbanized Area
Formula Apportionment Table 3. The
table also shows the apportionment
amount attributable by formula to each
small UZA within the State for
information purposes only unless the
small UZA is located within the
planning boundaries of a Transportation
Management Area (TMA). The Governor
is not bound by the small UZA amounts
published in this notice and shall
determine the sub-allocation of funds
among the small UZAs. The Governor’s
sub-allocation should be sent to the
appropriate FTA Regional Office before
grants being awarded. In the case of a
small UZA that is located within the
planning boundaries of TMA, the
Governor must allocate to that small
UZA, as discussed in subsection f
below.
b. Transit Enhancements
Section 5307(d)(1)(K) requires that
one percent of Section 5307 funds
apportioned to UZAs with populations
of 200,000 or more be spent on eligible
transit enhancement activities or
projects. This requirement is now
treated as a certification, rather than as
a set-aside as was the case under the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA–21). Designated
recipients in UZAs with populations of
200,000 or more certify they are
spending not less than one percent of
Section 5307 funds for transit
enhancements. In addition, Designated
Recipients must submit an annual
report on how they spent the money
with the Federal fiscal year’s final
quarterly progress report in TEAM-Web.
The report should include the following
elements: (1) Grantee name; (2) UZA
name and number; (3) FTA project
number; (4) transit enhancement
category; (5) brief description of
enhancement and progress towards
project implementation; (6) activity line
item code from the approved budget;
and (7) amount awarded by FTA for the
enhancement. The list of transit
enhancement categories and activity
line item (ALI) codes may be found in
the table of Scope and ALI codes on
TEAM-Web, which can be accessed at
https://FTATEAMWeb.fta.dot.gov.
The term ‘‘transit enhancement’’
includes projects or project elements
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
7053
that are designed to enhance public
transportation service or use and are
physically or functionally related to
transit facilities. Eligible enhancements
include the following: (1) Historic
preservation, rehabilitation, and
operation of historic mass transportation
buildings, structures, and facilities
(including historic bus and railroad
facilities); (2) bus shelters; (3)
landscaping and other scenic
beautification, including tables,
benches, trash receptacles, and street
lights; (4) public art; (5) pedestrian
access and walkways; (6) bicycle access,
including bicycle storage facilities and
installing equipment for transporting
bicycles on mass transportation
vehicles; (7) transit connections to parks
within the recipient’s transit service
area; (8) signage; and (9) enhanced
access for persons with disabilities to
mass transportation.
It is the responsibility of the MPO to
determine how the one-percent for
transit enhancements will be allotted to
transit projects. The one percent
minimum requirement does not
preclude more than one percent from
being expended in a UZA for transit
enhancements. However, activities that
are only eligible as enhancements—in
particular, operating costs for historic
facilities—may be assisted only within
the one-percent funding level.
c. Transit Security Projects
Consistent with section 5307(d)(1)(J),
each recipient of Urbanized Area
Formula funds must certify that of the
amount received each fiscal year, it will
expend at least one percent on ‘‘public
transportation security projects’’ or must
certify that it has decided the
expenditure is not necessary. For
applicants not eligible to receive Section
5307 funds for operating assistance,
only capital security projects may be
funded with the one percent.
SAFETEA–LU, however, expanded the
definition of eligible ‘‘capital’’ projects to
include specific crime prevention and
security activities, including: (1)
Projects to refine and develop security
and emergency response plans; (2)
projects aimed at detecting chemical
and biological agents in public
transportation; (3) the conduct of
emergency response drills with public
transportation agencies and local first
response agencies; and (4) security
training for public transportation
employees, but excluding all expenses
related to operations, other than such
expenses incurred in conducting
emergency drills and training. Activity
Line Item (ALI) codes have been
established for these four new capital
activities and will be used to track the
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7054
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
use of this provision. The one percent
may also include security expenditures
included within other capital activities,
and, where the recipient is eligible,
operating assistance.
FTA is often called upon to report to
Congress and others on how grantees are
expending Federal funds for security
enhancements. To facilitate tracking of
grantees’ security expenditures, which
are not always evident when included
within larger capital or operating
activity line items in the grant budget,
we have established a non-additive
(‘‘non-add’’) scope code for security
expenditures—Scope 991. The non-add
scope is to be used to aggregate
activities included in other scopes, and
it does not increase the budget total.
Section 5307 grantees should include
this non-add scope in the project budget
for each new Section 5307 grant
application or amendment. Under this
non-add scope, the applicant should
repeat the full amount of any of the line
items in the budget that are exclusively
for security and include the portion of
any other line item in the project budget
that is attributable to security, using
under the non-add scope the same line
item used in the project budget. The
grantee can modify the ALI description
or use the extended text feature, if
necessary, to describe the security
expenditures.
The grantee must provide information
regarding its use of the one percent for
security as part of each Section 5307
grant application, using a special screen
in TEAM-Web. If the grantee has
certified that it is not necessary to
expend one percent for security, the
Section 5307 grant application must
include information to support that
certification. FTA will not process an
application for a Section 5307 grant
until the security information is
complete.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
d. FY 2010 Operating Assistance
UZAs under 200,000 in population
may use Section 5307 funds for
operating assistance. In addition,
Section 5307, as amended, allows some
UZAs with a population of 200,000 or
more to use Urbanized Area Formula
funds for operating assistance under
certain conditions. CR, 2010 extends
that eligibility until February 28, 2010.
The specific provisions allowing the
limited use of operating assistance in
large UZAs follow:
(1) Section 5307(b)(1)(E) provides for
grants for the operating costs of
equipment and facilities for use in
public transportation in the Evansville,
IN–KY urbanized area, for a portion or
portions of the UZA if ‘‘the portion’’ of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
the UZA includes only one State, the
population of ‘‘the portion’’ is less than
30,000, and the grants will be not used
to provide public transportation outside
of ‘‘the portion’’ of the UZA.
(2) Section 5307(b)(1)(F) provides
operating costs of equipment and
facilities for use in public transportation
for local governmental authorities in
areas which adopted transit operating
and financing plans that became a part
of the Houston, Texas, UZA as a result
of the 2000 decennial census of
population, but lie outside the service
area of the principal public
transportation agency that serves the
Houston UZA.
(3) Section 5336(a)(2) prescribes the
formula to be used to apportion Section
5307 funds to UZAs with population of
200,000 or more. SAFETEA–LU
amended 5336(a)(2) to add language that
stated, ‘‘* * * except that the amount
apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized
area under subsection (b) shall be
available to the Alaska Railroad for any
costs related to its passenger
operations.’’ This language has the effect
of directing that funds apportioned to
the Anchorage urbanized area, under
the fixed guideway tiers of the Section
5307 apportionment formula, be made
available to the Alaska Railroad, and
that these funds may be used for any
capital or operating costs related to its
passenger operations.
(4) Section 3027(c)(3) of TEA–21, as
amended (49 U.S.C. 5307 note),
provides an exception to the restriction
on the use of operating assistance in a
UZA with a population of 200,000 or
more, by allowing transit providers/
grantees that provide service exclusively
to elderly persons and persons with
disabilities and that operate 20 or fewer
vehicles to use Section 5307 funds
apportioned to the UZA for operating
assistance. The total amount of funding
made available for this purpose under
Section 3027(c)(3) is $1.4 million.
Transit providers/grantees eligible
under this provision have already been
identified and notified.
(5) Consistent with the SAFETEA–LU
Technical Corrections Act, 2008, in FY
2009, section 5307(b)(2) allowed (1)
UZAs that grew in population from
under 200,000 to over 200,000 or that
were under 200,000 but merged into
another urbanized area and the
population is over 200,000, as a result
of the 2000 Census to use Section 5307
funds for operating assistance in an
amount up to 50 percent of the
grandfathered amount for FY 2002
funds; (2) Areas that were nonurbanized
under the 1990 Census and became
urbanized, as a result of the 2000
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Census, to use no more than 50 percent
of the amount apportioned to the area
for FY 2003 for operating assistance;
and (3) nonurbanized areas under the
1990 Census that merged into urbanized
areas over 200,000, as a result of the
2000 Census, to use 50 percent of the
amount the area received in FY 2002
Section 5311 funding for operating
assistance. CR 2010 continued these
special rules for the period October 1,
2009 through February 28, 2010.
e. Sources of Local Match
Consistent with to Section 5307(e),
the Federal share of an urbanized area
formula grant is 80 percent of net
project cost for a capital project and 50
percent of net project cost for operating
assistance unless the recipient indicates
a greater local share. The remainder of
the net project cost (i.e., 20 percent and
50 percent, respectively) shall be
provided from the following sources:
1. From non-Government sources
other than revenues from providing
public transportation services;
2. From revenues derived from the
sale of advertising and concessions;
3. From an undistributed cash
surplus, a replacement or depreciation
cash fund or reserve, or new capital;
4. From amounts received under a
service agreement with a State or local
social service agency or private social
service organization; and
5. Proceeds from the issuance of
revenue bonds.
6. Funds from Section
403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be
used to match Urbanized Area Formula
funds.
f. Designated Transportation
Management Areas (TMA)
Guidance for setting the boundaries of
TMAs is in the joint transportation
planning regulations codified at 23 CFR
part 450 as referenced in 49 CFR part
613. In some cases, the TMA planning
boundaries established by the MPO for
the designated TMA includes one or
more small UZAs. In addition, one
small UZA (Santa Barbara, CA) has been
designated as a TMA. In either of these
situations, the Governor cannot allocate
‘‘Governor’s Apportionment’’ funds
attributed to the small UZAs to other
areas; that is, the Governor only has
discretion to allocate Governor’s
Apportionment funds attributable to
areas that are outside of designated
TMA planning boundaries.
The list of small UZAs included
within the planning boundaries of
designated TMAs is provided in the
table below.
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7055
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
Designated TMA
Small urbanized area included in TMA planning boundary
Albany, NY ................................................................................................
Houston, TX ..............................................................................................
Saratoga Springs, NY.
Galveston, TX; Lake Jackson-Angleton, TX; Texas City, TX; The
Woodlands, TX.
St. Augustine, FL.
Kissimmee, FL.
Titusville, FL.
Pottstown, PA.
Monessen, PA; Weirton, WV–Steubenville, OH–PA (PA portion);
Uniontown-Connellsville, PA.
Bremerton, WA.
Frederick, MD.
Jacksonville, FL ........................................................................................
Orlando, FL ...............................................................................................
Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL ..........................................................................
Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD ..................................................................
Pittsburg, PA .............................................................................................
Seattle, WA ...............................................................................................
Washington, DC–VA–MD .........................................................................
The MPO must notify the Associate
Administrator for Program Management,
Federal Transit Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington,
DC 20590, in writing, no later than July
1 of each year of the identity of any
small UZA within the planning
boundaries of a TMA.
g. Urbanized Area Formula Funds Used
for Highway Purposes
Funds apportioned to a TMA are
eligible for transfer to FHWA for
highway projects, if the Designated
Recipient has allocated a portion of the
area’s Section 5307 funding for such
use. However, before funds can be
transferred, the following conditions
must be met: (1) approval by the MPO
in writing, after appropriate notice and
opportunity for comment and appeal are
provided to affected transit providers;
(2) a determination of the Secretary that
funds are not needed for investments
required by the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA); and (3)
the MPO determines that local transit
needs are being addressed.
The MPO should notify the
appropriate FTA Regional
Administrator of its intent to use FTA
funds for highway purposes, as
prescribed in section V.D below.
Urbanized Area Formula funds that are
designated by the MPO for highway
projects and meet the conditions cited
in the previous paragraph will be
transferred to and administered by
FHWA.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
4. Period of Availability
The Urbanized Area Formula Program
funds apportioned in this notice are
available for obligation during the year
of appropriation plus three additional
years. Accordingly, these funds must be
obligated in grants by September 30,
2013. Any apportioned funds that
remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2013, will
revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the Urbanized Area Formula
Program.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
In each UZA with a population of
200,000 or more, the Governor, in
consultation with responsible local
officials and publicly owned operators
of public transportation, has designated
one or more entities to be the
Designated Recipient for Section 5307
funds apportioned to the UZA. The
same entity(s) may or may not be the
Designated Recipient for the Job Access
and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New
Freedom program funds apportioned to
the UZA. In UZAs under 200,000 in
population, the State is the Designated
Recipient for Section 5307 as well as
JARC and New Freedom programs. The
Designated Recipient for Section 5307
may authorize other entities to apply
directly to FTA for Section 5307 grants
pursuant to a supplemental agreement.
While the requirement that projects
selected for funding be included in a
locally developed coordinated public
transit/human service transportation
plan is not included in Section 5307 as
it is in Sections 5310, 5316 (JARC) and
5317 (New Freedom), FTA expects that
in their role as public transit providers,
recipients of Section 5307 funds will be
participants in the local planning
process for these programs.
D. Clean Fuels Grant Program (49.U.S.C.
5308)
The Clean Fuels Grant program is a
discretionary grant program that
supports the use of alternative fuels in
air quality maintenance or
nonattainment areas for ozone or carbon
monoxide through capital grants to
urbanized areas for clean fuel vehicles
and facilities. For more information
about this program contact Juan
Morrison, Office of Program
Management, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $21,306,000 to the
Clean Fuels Grant program (49 U.S.C.
5308). FTA will publish allocations at a
later date.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
CLEAN FUEL GRANT PROGRAM
Total Apportioned .................
$21,306,000
2. Requirements
Clean Fuels Grant program funds may
be made available to any grantee in a
UZA that is designated as maintenance
or nonattainment area for ozone or
carbon monoxide as defined in the
Clean Air Act. Eligible recipients
include section 5307 Designated
Recipients as well as recipients in small
UZAs. The State in which a small UZA
is located will act as the recipient of
funds. Eligible projects include the
purchase or lease of clean fuel buses,
the construction or lease of clean fuel or
electrical recharging facilities and
related equipment for such buses, and
construction or improvement of public
transportation facilities to accommodate
clean fuel buses.
3. Period of Availability
Funds designated for specific Clean
Fuels Grant program projects are
available for obligation for three fiscal
years, which includes the year of
availability plus two additional fiscal
years. FY 2010 Clean Fuels funds not
obligated in an FTA grant for eligible
purposes by September 30, 2012, may
be made available for other section 5308
projects during the next fiscal year.
4. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Table 20 lists prior year carryover of
$56,812,150 for Clean Fuels Grant
program projects allocated project
funding in FY 2008 and FY 2009. This
amount includes $15,668,667 for FY
2008 and $41,143,483 for FY 2009. The
carryover amount for FY 2009 includes
$29,868,000 in unallocated funds.
E. Capital Investment Program (49
U.S.C. 5309)—Fixed Guideway
Modernization
This program provides capital
assistance for the maintenance,
recapitalization, and modernization of
existing fixed guideway systems. Funds
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7056
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
are apportioned by a statutory formula
to UZAs with fixed guideway systems
that have been in operation for at least
seven years. A ‘‘fixed guideway’’ refers
to any transit service that uses exclusive
or controlled rights-of-way or rails,
entirely or in part. The term includes
heavy rail, commuter rail, light rail,
monorail, trolleybus, aerial tramway,
inclined plane, cable car, automated
guideway transit, ferryboats, that
portion of motor bus service operated on
exclusive or controlled rights-of-way,
and high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV)
lanes. Eligible applicants are the public
transit authorities in those urbanized
areas to which the funds are
apportioned. For more information
about Fixed Guideway Modernization
contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
Fixed Guideway Modernization
formula.
FY 2010 Formula apportionments are
based on data grantees provided to the
NTD for the 2008 reporting year. Table
9 provides additional information and
details on the formula. Dollar unit
values for the formula factors used in
the Fixed Guideway Modernization
Program are displayed in Table 5. To
replicate an area’s apportionment,
multiply the dollar unit value by the
appropriate formula factor, i.e., route
miles and revenue vehicle miles.
3. Program Requirements
Fixed Guideway Modernization funds
must be used for capital projects to
maintain, modernize, or improve fixed
guideway systems. Eligible UZAs (those
with a population of 200,000 or more)
with fixed guideway systems that are at
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
least seven years old are entitled to
receive Fixed Guideway Modernization
CR 2010 provides $689,431,000 to the
funds. A threshold level of more than
Fixed Guideway Modernization
one mile of fixed guideway is required
Program. The total amount apportioned
in order to receive Fixed Guideway
for the Fixed Guideway Modernization
Modernization funds. Therefore, UZAs
Program is $682,536,690, after the
reporting one mile or less of fixed
deduction for oversight, as shown in the
guideway mileage under the NTD are
table below.
not included. However, funds
apportioned to an urbanized area may
FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION
be used on any fixed guideway segment
PROGRAM
in the UZA. Program guidance for Fixed
Guideway Modernization is presently
Total Appropriation ...............
$689,431,000 found in FTA Circular C9300.1B,
Oversight Deduction .............
¥$6,894,310
Capital Facilities and Formula Grant
Total Apportioned ..............
$682,536,690 Programs, dated November 1, 2008.
The FY 2010 Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program apportionments
to eligible areas are displayed in Table
8.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
The formula for allocating the Fixed
Guideway Modernization funds
contains seven tiers. The apportionment
of funding under the first four tiers is
based on amounts specified in law and
NTD data used to apportion funds in FY
1997. Funding under the last three tiers
is apportioned based on the latest
available data on route miles and
revenue vehicle miles on segments at
least seven years old, as reported to the
NTD. Section 5337(f) of title 49, U.S.C.
provides for the inclusion of
Morgantown, West Virginia (population
55,997) as an eligible UZA for purposes
of apportioning fixed guideway
modernization funds. Also, consistent to
49 U.S.C. 5336(b), FTA uses 60 percent
of the directional route miles
attributable to the Alaska Railroad
passenger operations system to calculate
the apportionment for the Anchorage,
Alaska UZA under the Section 5309
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned in this notice
under the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program remain
available to recipients to be obligated in
a grant during the year of appropriation
plus three additional years. FY 2010
Fixed Guideway Modernization funds
that remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2013, will
revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program.
F. Capital Investment Program (49
U.S.C. 5309)—Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities
This program provides capital
assistance for new and replacement
buses, and related equipment and
facilities. Funds are allocated on a
discretionary basis. Eligible purposes
are acquisition of buses for fleet and
service expansion, bus maintenance and
administrative facilities, transfer
facilities, bus malls, transportation
centers, intermodal terminals, park-andride stations, acquisition of replacement
vehicles, bus rebuilds, bus preventive
maintenance, passenger amenities such
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
as passenger shelters and bus stop signs,
accessory and miscellaneous equipment
such as mobile radio units, supervisory
vehicles, fare boxes, computers, and
shop and garage equipment. Eligible
applicants are State and local
governmental authorities. Eligible
subrecipients include other public
agencies, private companies engaged in
public transportation and private nonprofit organizations. For more
information about Bus and Bus Related
Facilities contact Juan Morrison, Office
of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $365,711,000 for
the Bus and Bus Related Facilities
program. After deduction of one percent
for program management oversight,
$362,053,890 remains available.
BUS AND BUS RELATED FACILITIES
Total Appropriation ...............
Oversight Deduction .............
$365,711,000
¥$3,657,110
Total Apportioned ..............
$362,053,890
2. Requirements
Grants made under the Bus and Bus
Related Facilities program must meet all
eligibility requirements as outlined in
Section 5309 unless otherwise specified
in law.
Program guidance for Bus and Bus
Related Facilities is found in FTA
Circular C9300.1B, ‘‘Capital Investment
Program Guidance and Application
Instructions,’’ (November 1, 2008).
3. Period of Availability
The FY 2010 Bus and Bus Related
Facilities funds not obligated in a grant
for eligible purposes as of September 30,
2012, may be made available for other
bus and bus facility projects under 49
U.S.C. 5309.
4. Other Program or Allocation Related
Information and Highlights
Prior year unobligated balances for
Bus and Bus-Related allocations in the
amount of $852,519,277 remain
available for obligation in FY 2010. This
includes $242,431,083 in FY 2008 and
$610,088,195 for FY 2009. The prior
year carryover amounts are displayed in
Table 10. The carryover amount for FY
2009 includes $114,095,771 in
unallocated funds which may be
awarded competitively under the
Livability Bus Program Notice of
Funding Availability published on
December 8, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7057
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
G. Capital Investment Program (49
U.S.C. 5309)—New Starts and Small
Starts
The New and Small Starts program
provides funds for construction of new
fixed guideway systems, or extensions
to existing fixed guideway systems, or
corridor based bus systems. Eligible
purposes for the New Starts program are
light rail, rapid rail (heavy rail),
commuter rail, monorail, automated
fixed guideway system (such as a
‘‘people mover’’), or a busway/high
occupancy vehicle (HOV) facility, Bus
Rapid Transit that is fixed guideway, or
an extension of any of these. Eligible
purposes for the Small Starts program
are those mentioned for the New Starts
program, as well as corridor based bus
systems that do not operate on a fixed
guideway but include elements such as
substantial transit stations, signal
priority or pre-emption, branding of
vehicles, and service frequencies of 10
minutes during peak periods and 15
minutes during off peak periods for at
least 14 hours per day.
Projects become candidates for
funding under this program by
successfully completing the appropriate
steps in the major capital investment
planning and project development
process. Major new fixed guideway
projects, or extensions to existing
systems, financed with New Starts
funds typically receive these funds
through a full funding grant agreement
(FFGA) that defines the scope of the
project and specifies the total multi-year
Federal commitment to the project.
Projects funded with Small Starts funds
typically receive these funds through a
project construction grant agreement
(PCGA) that defines the scope of the
project and specifies the total multi-year
Federal commitment to the project.
However, Small Starts projects that
request less than $25 million in total
Small Starts funding or whose request
can be met with a single year
appropriation or with existing
appropriations are generally funded
under a one-year capital grant rather
than a PCGA.
As of FY 2007, up to $200,000,000
each year is designated for ‘‘Small
Starts’’ (Section 5309(e)) projects with a
New Starts share of less than
$75,000,000 and a net project cost of
less than $250,000,000.
For more information about New
Starts project development contact
Elizabeth Day, Office of Planning and
Environment, at (202) 366–4033, or for
information about published allocations
contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
The Appropriations Act, 2010,
provides $2,000,000,000 to New Starts.
After a one percent oversight takedown,
the total amount allocated for New
Starts and Small Starts is
$1,980,000,000, as shown in the table
below.
Circulator NOFA published on
December 8, 2009. These unobligated
amounts are displayed in Table 12.
H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals
and Individuals With Disabilities
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
This program provides formula
funding to States for capital projects to
assist private nonprofit groups in
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM (NEW meeting the transportation needs of the
STARTS AND SMALL STARTS)
elderly and individuals with disabilities
when the public transportation service
Total Appropriation ...........
$2,000,000,000
provided in the area is unavailable,
Oversight (one percent) ....
¥$20,000,000
insufficient, or inappropriate to meet
Total Available ..............
$1,980,000,000 these needs. A State agency designated
by the Governor administers the Section
5310 program. The State’s
2. Basis for Allocation
responsibilities include: notifying
Congress included authorizations for
eligible local entities of funding
specific New Starts projects with FFGA
availability; developing project selection
in SAFETEA–LU. Under the
criteria; determining applicant
Appropriations Act, 2010, the one
eligibility; selecting projects for funding;
percent statutory project management
and ensuring that all subrecipients
oversight takedown has been applied.
comply with Federal requirements.
Funds allocated to specific projects are
Eligible nonprofit organizations or
shown in Table 11.
public bodies must apply directly to the
designated State agency for assistance
3. Requirements
under this program. For more
FTA has published a number of
information about the Elderly and
policy guidance documents related to
Individuals with Disabilities Program
the New Starts program since the
contact Gil Williams, Office of Transit
passage of SAFETEA–LU. Grantees
Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
should reference the FTA Web site at
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
https://www.fta.dot.gov for the most
current program guidance about project
CR 2010 provides $55,229,000 to the
developments and management. Grant
Elderly and Individuals with
related guidance for New Starts is found Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310).
in FTA Circular 9300.1B, ‘‘Capital
After deduction of 0.5 percent for
Investment Program Guidance and
oversight, and the addition of
Application Instructions,’’ dated
reapportioned prior year funds,
November 1, 2008; and FTA Circular
$54,952,855 remains available for
5200.1A, ‘‘Full Funding Grant
allocation to the States.
Agreement Guidance,’’ dated December
5, 2002.
ELDERLY AND INDIVIDUALS WITH
DISABILITIES PROGRAM
4. Period of Availability
New Starts funds remain available for
three fiscal years (including the fiscal
year the funds are made available or
appropriated plus two additional years).
FY 2010 funds remain available for
obligation to identified projects through
September 30, 2012. Funds may be
made available for other section 5309
New Starts projects after the period of
availability has expired.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Prior year unobligated allocations
(carryover) for New Starts in the amount
of $1,179,391,814 remain available for
obligation in FY 2010. This amount
includes $138,969,867 in FY 2008,
$1,040,421,947 in FY 2009 unobligated
allocations, and $12,207 in unallocated
FY 2009 funds, which will be allocated
through the competitive Urban
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Total Appropriation ...............
Oversight Deduction .............
$55,229,000
¥$276,145
Total Apportioned ..............
$54,952,855
The FY 2010 Elderly and Individuals
with Disabilities Program
apportionments to the States are
displayed in Table 13.
2. Basis for Apportionment
FTA allocates funds to the States by
an administrative formula consisting of
a $125,000 floor for each State ($50,000
for smaller territories) with the balance
allocated based on 2000 Census
population data for persons aged 65 and
over and for persons with disabilities.
3. Requirements
Funds are available to support the
capital costs of transportation services
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7058
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
for older adults and people with
disabilities. Uniquely under this
program, eligible capital costs include
the acquisition of service. Seven
specified States (Alaska, Louisiana,
Minnesota, North Carolina, Oregon,
South Carolina, and Wisconsin) may use
up to 33 percent of their apportionment
for operating assistance under the terms
of the SAFETEA–LU Section 3012(b)
pilot program.
Capital assistance is provided on an
80 percent Federal, 20 percent local
matching basis except that Section
5310(c) allows States eligible for a
higher match under the sliding scale for
FHWA programs to use that match ratio
for Section 5310 capital projects.
Operating assistance is 50 percent
Federal, 50 percent local. Funds
provided under other Federal programs
(other than those of the DOT, with the
exception of the Federal Lands Highway
Program established by 23 U.S.C. 204)
may be used as match. Revenue from
service contracts may also be used as
local match.
While the assistance is intended
primarily for private non-profit
organizations, public bodies approved
by the State to coordinate services for
the elderly and individuals with
disabilities, or any public body that
certifies to the State that there are no
non-profit organizations in the area that
are readily available to carry out the
service, may receive these funds.
States may use up to ten percent of
their annual apportionment to
administer, plan, and provide technical
assistance for a funded project. No local
share is required for these program
administrative funds. Funds used under
this program for planning must be
shown in the United Planning Work
Program (UPWP) for MPO(s) with
responsibility for that area.
The State recipient must certify that:
the projects selected were derived from
a locally developed, coordinated public
transit-human services transportation
plan; and, the plan was developed
through a process that included
representatives of public, private, and
nonprofit transportation and human
services providers and participation by
the public. The locally developed,
coordinated public transit-human
services transportation planning process
must be coordinated and consistent
with the metropolitan and statewide
planning processes and funding for the
program must be included in the
metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity
or aggregation consistent with State and
local policies and procedures. Finally,
the State must certify that allocations to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
subrecipients are made on a fair and
equitable basis.
The coordinated planning
requirement is a requirement in two
additional programs. Projects selected
for funding under the Job Access
Reverse Commute program and the New
Freedom program also are required to be
derived from a locally developed
coordinated public transit/human
service transportation plan. FTA
anticipates that most areas will develop
one consolidated plan for all the
programs, which may include separate
elements and other human service
transportation programs.
The Section 5310 program is subject
to the requirements of Section 5307
formula program to the extent the
Secretary determines appropriate.
Program guidance is found in FTA
Circular 9070.1F, dated May 1, 2007.
The circular is posted on the FTA Web
site at https://www.fta.dot.gov.
4. Period of Availability
FTA has administratively established
a three-year period of availability for
Section 5310 funds. Funds allocated to
States under the Elderly and Individuals
with Disabilities Program in this notice
must be obligated by September 30,
2012. Any funding that remains
unobligated as of that date will revert to
FTA for reapportionment among the
States under the Elderly and Individuals
with Disabilities Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
States may transfer Section 5310
funds to Section 5307 or Section 5311,
but only for projects selected under the
Section 5310 program, not as a general
supplement for those programs. FTA
anticipates that the States would use
this flexibility primarily for projects to
be implemented by a Section 5307
recipient in a small urbanized area, or
for Federally recognized Indian Tribes
that elect to receive funds as a direct
recipient from FTA under Section 5311.
A State that transfers Section 5310
funds to Section 5307 must certify that
each project for which the funds are
transferred has been coordinated with
private nonprofit providers of services.
FTA has established a scope code (641)
in the TEAM grant system to track
Section 5310 projects included within a
Section 5307 or 5311 grant. Transfer to
Section 5307 or 5311 is permitted, but
not required. FTA expects primarily to
award stand-alone Section 5310 grants
to the State for any and all
subrecipients.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
6. Performance Measure
To support the evaluation of the
program, FTA has established
performance measures for the Section
5310 program, which should be
submitted with the State’s annual
program of projects status report on
October 31, 2010. States should submit
performance measures on behalf of their
subrecipients.
I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
(49 U.S.C. 5311)
This program provides formula
funding to States and Indian Tribes for
the purpose of supporting public
transportation in areas with a
population of less than 50,000. Funding
may be used for capital, operating, State
administration, and project
administration expenses. Eligible
subrecipients include State and local
governmental authority, Indian Tribes,
private non-profit organizations, and
private operators of public
transportation services, including
intercity bus companies. Indian Tribes
are also eligible direct recipients under
Section 5311, both for funds
apportioned to the States and for
projects selected to be funded with
funds set aside for a separate Tribal
Transit Program.
For more information about the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
contact Lorna Wilson, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $192,371,000 to the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
(49 U.S.C. 5311). The total amount
apportioned for the Nonurbanized Area
Formula Program is $ $211,640,513 after
take-downs of two percent for the Rural
Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP), 0.5 percent for oversight, and
$6,206,000 for the Tribal Transit
Program, and the addition of Section
5340 funding for Growing States, as
shown in the table below.
NONURBANIZED AREA FORMULA
PROGRAM
Total Appropriation ...............
Oversight Deduction .............
Tribal Takedown ...................
RTAP Takedown ..................
Section 5340 Funds Added ..
$192,371,000
¥$961,855
¥$6,206,000
¥$3,847,000
$30,284,368
Total Apportioned ..............
$211,640,513
The FY 2010 Nonurbanized Area
Formula apportionments to the States
are displayed in Table 14.
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7059
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
2. Basis for Apportionments
FTA apportions the funds after takedown for oversight, the Tribal Transit
Program, and RTAP according to a
statutory formula. FTA apportions the
first twenty percent to the States based
on land area in nonurbanized areas with
no state receiving more than 5 percent
of the amount apportioned. FTA
apportions the remaining eighty percent
based on nonurbanized population of
each State relative to the national
nonurbanized population. FTA does not
apportion Section 5311 funds to the
Virgin Islands, which by a statutory
exception are treated as an urbanized
area for purposes of the Section 5307
formula program.
FTA is allocating $191,409,145 to the
States and territories for nonurbanized
areas from the Growing States portion of
Section 5340. FTA apportions Growing
States funds by a formula based on State
population forecasts for 15 years beyond
the most recent census. FTA distributes
the amounts apportioned for each State
between UZAs and nonurbanized areas
based on the ratio of urbanized/
nonurbanized population within each
State in the 2000 census.
3. Program Requirements
The Nonurbanized Area Formula
Program provides capital, operating and
administrative assistance for public
transit service in nonurbanized areas
under 50,000 in population.
The Federal share for capital
assistance is 80 percent and for
operating assistance is 50 percent,
except that States eligible for the sliding
scale match under FHWA programs may
use that match ratio for Section 5311
capital projects and 62.5 percent of the
sliding scale capital match ratio for
operating projects.
Each State must spend no less than 15
percent of its FY 2010 Nonurbanized
Area Formula apportionment for the
development and support of intercity
bus transportation, unless the State
certifies, after consultation with affected
intercity bus service providers, that the
intercity bus service needs of the State
are being adequately met. FTA also
encourages consultation with other
stakeholders, such as communities
affected by loss of intercity service.
Each State prepares an annual
program of projects, which must
provide for fair and equitable
distribution of funds within the States,
including Indian reservations, and must
provide for maximum feasible
coordination with transportation
services assisted by other Federal
sources.
To retain eligibility for funding,
recipients of Section 5311 funding must
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
report data annually to the NTD.
Additional information on NTD
reporting is contained in paragraph 5 of
this section, below.
Program guidance for the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program is
found in FTA Circular 9040.1F,
‘‘Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
Guidance and Grant Application
Instructions,’’ dated April 1, 2007. The
circular is posted at
https://www.fta.dot.gov.
4. Period of Availability
It was administratively determined
that funds apportioned to nonurbanized
areas under the Nonurbanized Area
Formula Program during FY 2010 will
remain available for obligation for two
additional fiscal years after the year of
apportionment. Any funds that remain
unobligated at the close of business on
September 30, 2012, will revert to FTA
for reapportionment among the States
under the Nonurbanized Area Formula
Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. NTD Reporting. By law, FTA
requires that each recipient under the
Section 5311 program submit an annual
report to the NTD containing
information on capital investments,
operations, and service provided with
funds received under the Section 5311
program. Section 5311(b)(4), as
amended by SAFETEA–LU, specifies
that the report shall include information
on total annual revenue, sources of
revenue, total annual operating costs,
total annual capital costs, fleet size and
type, and related facilities, revenue
vehicle miles, and ridership. State or
Territorial DOT 5311 grant recipients
must complete a one-page form of basic
data for each 5311 subrecipient, unless
the subrecipient is already providing a
full report to the NTD as a Tribal Transit
direct recipient or as an urbanized area
reporter (without receiving a Nine or
Fewer Vehicles Waiver). For the 2009
Report Year State or Territorial DOTs
must report on behalf of any
subrecipient receiving Section 5311
grants in 2009, or that continued to
benefit in 2009 from capital assets
purchased using Section 5311 grants.
Tribal Transit direct recipients must
report if they received an obligation or
an outlay for a Section 5311 grant in
2009, or if they continued to benefit in
2009 from capital assets using Section
5311 Grants, unless the Tribe is already
filing a full NTD Report as an urbanized
area reporter or unless the Tribe only
received $50,000 or less in planning
grants. The NTD Rural Reporting
Manual contains detailed reporting
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
instructions and is posted on the NTD
Web site, https://www.ntdprogram.gov.
b. Extension of Intercity Bus Pilot of
In-Kind Match. Beginning in FY 2007,
FTA implemented a two year pilot
program of in-kind match for intercity
bus service. The initial program was set
to expire after FY 2008; however, FTA
decided to extend the program through
FY 2009. Through this notice FTA
extends the In-Kind Match program
through FY 2010. FTA published
guidance on the in-kind match pilot in
the Federal Register on February 28,
2007, as Appendix 1 of the Notice
announcing the final revised circular
9040.1F, which is available at https://
www.fta.dot.gov.
J. Rural Transportation Assistance
Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3))
This program provides funding to
assist in the design and implementation
of training and technical assistance
projects, research, and other support
services tailored to meet the needs of
transit operators in nonurbanized areas.
For more information about Rural
Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP) contact Lorna Wilson, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $3,847,000 to RTAP
(49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(2)), as a two percent
takedown from the funds appropriated
for Section 5311. FTA has reserved 15
percent for the National RTAP program.
A total of $3,269,950 is available for
allocations to the States, as shown in the
table below.
RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM
Total Appropriation ...............
National RTAP Takedown ....
$3,847,000
¥$577,050
Total Apportioned ..............
$3,269,950
Table 14 shows the FY 2010 RTAP
allocations to the States.
2. Basis for Allocation
FTA allocates funds to the States by
an administrative formula. First FTA
allocates $65,000 to each State ($10,000
to territories), and then allocates the
balance based on nonurbanized
population in the 2000 census.
3. Program Requirements
States may use the funds to undertake
research, training, technical assistance,
and other support services to meet the
needs of transit operators in
nonurbanized areas. These funds are to
be used in conjunction with a State’s
administration of the Nonurbanized
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7060
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
Area Formula Program, but also may
support the rural components of the
Section 5310, JARC, and New Freedom
programs.
4. Period of Availability
FTA administratively established that
funds apportioned to States under RTAP
remain available for obligation two
fiscal years following FY 2010. Any
funds that remain unobligated at the
close of business on September 30,
2012, will revert to FTA for allocation
among the States under the RTAP.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
The National RTAP project is
administered by cooperative agreement
and re-competed at five-year intervals.
In FY 2008, FTA awarded the
cooperative agreement to the Neponset
Valley Transportation Management
Association (NVTMA) located in
Waltham, Massachusetts through a
competitive process. The National
RTAP projects are guided by a project
review board that consists of managers
of rural transit systems and State DOT
RTAP programs. National RTAP
resources also support the biennial TRB
National Conference on Rural Public
and Intercity Bus Transportation and
other research and technical assistance
projects of a national scope.
K. Public Transportation on Indian
Reservations Program (49 U.S.C.
5311(c)(1))
FTA refers to this program as the
Tribal Transit Program. It is funded as
a takedown from funds appropriated for
the Section 5311 program. Eligible
direct recipients are Federally
recognized Indian Tribes. The funds are
to be allocated for grants to Indian
Tribes for any purpose eligible under
Section 5311, which includes capital,
operating, planning, and administrative
assistance for rural public transit
services and rural intercity bus service.
For more information about the Tribal
Transit Program contact Lorna Wilson,
Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–
2053.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
1. Funding Availability in FY 2010
Under CR 2010 the amount allocated
to the program in FY 2010 is $6,206,000,
as authorized in Section 5311(c)(1)(C).
2. Basis for Allocation
Based on procedures developed in
consultation with the Tribes, FTA will
issue a Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA) soliciting applications for FY
2010 funds. Projects funded under the
Tribal Transit Program are not required
to have local match.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
3. Requirements
FTA developed streamlined program
requirements based on statutory
authority allowing the Secretary to
determine the terms and conditions
appropriate to the program. These
conditions are contained in the annual
NOFA. Beginning with grants awarded
in FY 2009, the grant agreement has
incorporated the statement of warranty
for labor protective arrangements, and
tribal grants will be submitted to the
Department of Labor (DOL) for
information upon FTA approval.
4. Period of Availability
Funds remain available for three fiscal
years, which includes the fiscal year the
funds were apportioned or appropriated
plus two additional years. Funds
appropriated in FY 2010 will remain
available for obligation to the tribes
competitively selected to receive the
funds through September 30, 2012. Any
funds that remain unobligated after
September 30, 2012, will revert to FTA
for reallocation among the Tribes.
5. Other Program Changes and
Highlights
The funds set aside for the Tribal
Transit Program are not meant to
replace or reduce funds that Indian
Tribes receive from states through the
Section 5311 program but are to be used
to enhance public transportation on
Indian reservations and transit serving
tribal communities. Funds allocated to
Tribes by the States may be included in
the State’s Section 5311 application or
awarded by FTA in a grant directly to
the Tribe. We encourage Tribes
intending to apply to FTA as direct
recipients to contact the appropriate
FTA regional office at the earliest
opportunity.
Technical assistance for Tribes may
be available from the State DOT using
the State’s allocation of RTAP or funds
available for State administration under
Section 5311, from the Tribal
Transportation Assistance Program
(TTAP) Centers supported by FHWA,
and from the Community
Transportation Association of America
under a program funded by the United
States Department of Agriculture
(USDA). The National RTAP will also be
developing new resources for Tribal
Transit.
L. National Research Programs (49
U.S.C. 5314)
FTA’s National Research Programs
(NRPs) include the National Research
and Technology Program (NRTP), the
Transit Cooperative Research Program
(TCRP), the National Transit Institute
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(NTI), and the University Transportation
Centers Program (UTC).
Through funding under these
programs, FTA seeks to deliver
solutions that improve public
transportation. FTA’s Strategic Research
Goals are to provide transit research
leadership, increase transit ridership,
improve capital and operating
efficiencies, improve safety and
emergency preparedness, and to protect
the environment and promote energy
independence. For more information
contact Linda Wolfe, Office of Research,
Demonstration and Innovation, at (202)
366–8511.
1. Funding Availability in FY 2010
The Appropriations Act 2010
provides $65,670,000 for the Research
and University Research Centers
Programs. Of this amount $10,000,000 is
allocated for TCRP, $4,300,000 for NTI,
$7,000,000 for the UTC, and
$44,370,000 for NRTP. Within the
NRTP–$4,000,000 is allocated for
specific activities under 49 U.S.C.
5338(d). The Appropriations Act, 2010
also provides $1,500,000 for specific
projects and $5,000,000 for asset
management activities. All research and
research and development projects, as
defined by the Office of Management
and Budget, are subject to a 2.6%
reduction for the Small Business
Innovative Research Program (SBIR). A
project allocation table with the entire
year’s funding will be published in a
subsequent notice.
2. Program Requirements
Application Instructions and Program
Management Guidelines are set forth in
FTA Circular 6100.1C published on May
2, 2003 and available at
www.fta.dot.gov. Research projects must
support FTA’s Strategic Research Goals
and meet the Office of Management and
Budget’s Research and Development
Investment Criteria. All research
recipients are required to work with
FTA to develop approved Statements of
Work and plans to evaluate research
results before award.
Eligible activities under the NRTP
include research, development,
demonstration and deployment projects
as described in 49 U.S.C. 5312(a); Joint
Partnership projects for deployment of
innovation as described in 49 U.S.C.
5312(b); International Mass
Transportation Projects as described in
49 U.S.C. 5312(c); and, human resource
programs as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5322.
Unless otherwise specified in law, all
projects must meet one of these
eligibility requirements.
Problem Statements for TCRP can be
submitted on TCRP’s Web site: https://
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
www.tcrponline.org. Information about
NTI courses can be found at https://
www.ntionline.com. UTC funds are
transferred to the Research and
Innovative Technology Administration
to make awards.
3. Period of Availability
Funds are available until expended.
4. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Funds not designated by Congress for
specific projects and activities will be
programmed by FTA based on national
priorities. Opportunities are posted in
https://www.grants.gov under Catalogue
of Federal Domestic Assistance Number
20.514.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
M. Job Access and Reverse Commute
Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
The Job Access and Reverse Commute
(JARC) program provides formula
funding to States and Designated
Recipients to support the development
and maintenance of job access projects
designed to transport welfare recipients
and low-income individuals to and from
jobs and activities related to their
employment, and for reverse commute
projects designed to transport residents
of UZAs and other than urbanized areas
to suburban employment opportunities.
For more information about the JARC
program contact Gil Williams, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
apportionments to each State for small
UZAs and for rural and small urban
areas and a single apportionment for
each large UZA.
The Designated Recipient, either for
the State or for a large UZA, is
responsible for further allocating the
funds to specific projects and
subrecipients through a competitive
selection process. If the Governor has
designated more than one recipient of
JARC funds in a large UZA, the
Designated Recipients may agree to
conduct a single competitive selection
process or sub-allocate funds to each
Designated Recipient, based upon a
percentage split agreed upon locally,
and conduct separate competitions.
States may transfer funds between the
small UZA and the nonurbanized
apportionments, if all of the objectives
of JARC are met in the size area the
funds are taken from. States may also
use funds apportioned to the small UZA
and nonurbanized area apportionments
for projects anywhere in the State
(including large UZAs) if the State has
established a statewide program for
meeting the objectives of JARC. A State
that is planning to transfer funds under
either of these provisions should submit
a request to the FTA regional office.
FTA will assign new accounting codes
to the funds before obligating them in a
grant.
3. Requirements
States and Designated Recipients
1. Funding Availability in FY 2010
must solicit grant applications and
CR 2010 provides $68,054,000 for the select projects competitively, based on
application procedures and
JARC Program. The total amount
apportioned by formula is shown in the requirements established by the
Designated Recipient, consistent with
table below.
the Federal JARC program objectives. In
JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE the case of large UZAs, the area-wide
solicitation shall be conducted in
PROGRAM
cooperation with the appropriate
Total Apportioned .................
$68,054,000 MPO(s).
Funds are available to support the
planning, capital, and operating costs of
Table 16 shows the FY 2010 JARC
transportation services that are eligible
apportionments.
for funding under the program.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
Assistance may be provided for a variety
By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of
of transportation services and strategies
funds available to UZAs with
directed at assisting welfare recipients
populations of 200,000 or more persons and eligible low-income individuals to
(large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for address unmet transportation needs,
urbanized areas with populations
and to provide reverse commute
ranging from 50,000 to 199,999 persons
services. The transportation services
(small UZAs), and 20 percent to the
may be provided by public, non-profit,
States for rural and small urban areas
or private-for-profit operators. The
with populations of less than 50,000
Federal share is 80 percent of capital
persons. FTA apportions funds based
and planning expenses and 50 percent
upon the number of low income
of operating expenses. Funds provided
individuals residing in a State or large
under other Federal programs (other
urbanized area, using data from the
than those of the DOT, with the
2000 Census for individuals with
exception of the Federal Lands Highway
incomes below 150 percent of the
Program established by 23 U.S.C. 204)
poverty level. FTA publishes
may be used for local/State match for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
7061
funds provided under Section 5316, and
revenue from service contracts may be
used as local match.
States and Designated Recipients may
use up to ten percent of their annual
apportionment for administration,
planning, and to provide technical
assistance. No local share is required for
these program administrative funds.
Funds used under this program for
planning in urbanized areas must be
shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with
responsibility for that area.
The Designated Recipient must certify
that: the projects selected were derived
from a locally developed, coordinated
public transit-human services
transportation plan; and, the plan was
developed through a process that
included representatives of public,
private, and nonprofit transportation
and human services providers and
participation by the public, including
those representing the needs of welfare
recipients and eligible low-income
individuals. The locally developed,
coordinated public transit-human
services transportation planning process
must be coordinated and consistent
with the metropolitan and statewide
planning processes and funding for the
program must be included in the
metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity
or aggregation consistent with State and
local policies and procedures. Finally,
the State must certify that allocations of
the grant to subrecipients are made on
a fair and equitable basis.
The coordinated planning
requirement is also a requirement in two
additional programs. Projects selected
for funding under the Elderly and
Individuals with Disabilities Program
(Section 5310) and the New Freedom
program (Section 5317) also are required
to be derived from a locally developed
coordinated public transit-human
service transportation plan. FTA
anticipates that most areas will develop
one consolidated plan for all the
programs, which may include separate
elements and other human service
transportation programs. The goal of the
coordinated planning process is not to
be an exhaustive document, but to serve
as a tool for planning and implementing
beneficial projects. The level of effort
required to develop the plan will vary
among communities based on factors
such as the availability of resources.
FTA does not approve coordinated
plans.
The JARC program is subject to the
relevant requirements of Section 5307,
including the requirement for
certification of labor protections. JARC
program requirements are published in
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7062
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
FTA Circular 9050.1, dated April 1,
2007. The circular and other guidance
including frequently asked questions are
posted on the FTA Web site at
https://www.fta.dot.gov.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
4. Period of Availability
FTA has established a consistent
three-year period of availability for
JARC, New Freedom, and the Section
5310 program, which includes the year
of apportionment plus two additional
years. FY 2010 funding is available for
obligation through FY 2012. Any
funding that remains unobligated on
September 30, 2012 will revert to FTA
for reapportionment among the States
and large UZAs under the JARC
program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. Carryover Earmarks. Table 17 lists
prior year carryover of $5,215,394 for
JARC projects designated by Congress in
FYs 2002–2005. JARC earmarks carried
over from TEA–21 are subject to the
terms and conditions under which they
were originally appropriated, including
the requirement for a 50 percent local
share for both capital and operating
assistance. All projects should be in a
regional JARC Plan as required under
TEA–21 or in the new local coordinated
plan required by the new formula JARC
program. FTA will award a grant for a
designated project upon receipt of a
complete application, but can honor
changes to the original designation only
if so directed by the Appropriations
Committee chairs. Grantees intending to
use their remaining discretionary JARC
funds should obligate funds before
September 30, 2010.
b. Designated Recipient. FTA must
have received formal notification from
the Governor or Governor’s designee of
the Designated Recipient for JARC funds
apportioned to a State or large UZA
before awarding a grant to that area for
JARC projects.
c. Transfers to Section 5307 or Section
5311. States may transfer JARC funds to
Section 5307 or Section 5311, but only
for projects competitively selected
under the JARC program, not as a
general supplement for those programs.
FTA anticipates that the States would
use this flexibility primarily for projects
to be implemented by a Section 5307
recipient in a small urbanized area or
for Federally recognized Indian Tribes
that elect to receive funds as a direct
recipient from FTA under Section 5311.
FTA has established a scope code (646)
to track JARC projects included within
a Section 5307 or 5311 grant. All
activities within a Section 5307 or
Section 5311 grant application that are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
funded with JARC resources should be
listed under the 646–00 scope code.
Transfer to Section 5307 or 5311 is
permitted but not required. FTA also
will award stand-alone JARC grants to
the State for any and all subrecipients.
To track disbursements accurately
against the appropriate program, FTA
will not combine JARC funds with
Section 5307 funds in a single Section
5307 grant, nor will FTA combine JARC
with New Freedom funds in a single
Section 5307 grant.
selection process. If the Governor has
designated more than one recipient of
New Freedom funds in a large UZA, the
Designated Recipients may agree to
conduct a single competitive selection
process or sub-allocate funds to each
Designated Recipient, based upon a
percentage split agreed on locally and
conduct separate competitions.
3. Requirements
States and Designated Recipients
must solicit grant applications and
select projects competitively, based on
N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C.
application procedures and
5317)
requirements established by the
Designated Recipient, consistent with
SAFETEA–LU established the New
Freedom Program under 49 U.S.C. 5317. the Federal New Freedom program
objectives. In the case of large UZAs, the
The program purpose is to provide new
area-wide solicitation shall be
public transportation services and
conducted in cooperation with the
public transportation alternatives
appropriate MPO(s).
beyond those currently required by the
Funds are available to support the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
capital and operating costs of new
(42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) that assist
public transportation services and
individuals with disabilities with
transportation, including transportation public transportation alternatives that
are beyond those required by the
to and from jobs and employment
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
support services. For more information
Funds provided under other Federal
about the New Freedom program
programs (other than those of the DOT,
contact Gil Williams, Office of Transit
with the exception of the Federal Lands
Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
Highway Program established by 23
1. Funding Availability in FY 2010
U.S.C. 204) may be used as match for
CR 2010 provides $38,267,000 for the capital funds provided under Section
5317, and revenue from contract
New Freedom Program. The entire
services may be used as local match.
amount is apportioned by formula, as
Funding is available for transportation
shown in the table below.
services provided by public, non-profit,
or private-for-profit operators.
NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM
Assistance may be provided for a variety
Total Apportioned .................
$38,267,000 of transportation services and strategies
directed at assisting persons with
disabilities to address unmet
Table 18 shows the FY 2010 New
transportation needs. Eligible public
Freedom apportionments.
transportation services and public
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
transportation alternatives funded under
By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of
the New Freedom program must be both
funds available to UZAs with
new and beyond the ADA. (In FY 2007,
populations of 200,000 or more persons FTA published interim guidance
(large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for holding Designated Recipients harmless
urbanized areas with populations
for project selections conducted in good
ranging from 50,000 to 199,999 persons
faith based on FTA’s earlier preliminary
(small UZAs), and 20 percent to the
determination that eligible services
States for rural and small urban areas
could be either new or beyond the ADA.
with populations of less than 50,000
Grants awarded in FY 2010 are now
persons. FTA apportions funds based
subject to the requirements of the final
upon the number of persons with
guidance which was published April 1,
disabilities over the age of five residing
2007).
In a notice of policy change published
in a State or large urbanized area, using
on April 29, 2009, (Federal Register
data from the 2000 Census. FTA
Volume 74 Number 81, April 29, 2009)
publishes apportionments to each State
FTA expanded the type of projects it
for small UZAs and for rural and small
considers to be ‘‘beyond the ADA’’ and
urban areas and a single apportionment
thus increase the types of projects
for each large UZA.
The Designated Recipient, either for
eligible for funding under the New
the State or for a large UZA, is
Freedom program. Under interpretation
responsible for further allocating the
published in the Federal Register, new
funds to specific projects and
and expanded fixed route and demand
subrecipients through a competitive
responsive transit service planned for
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
and designed to meet the needs of
individuals with disabilities are eligible
projects.
The Federal share is 80 percent of
capital expenses and 50 percent of
operating expenses. Funds provided
under other Federal programs (other
than those of the DOT) may be used for
local/state match for funds provided
under Section 5317, and revenue from
service contracts may be used as local
match.
States and Designated Recipients may
use up to ten percent of their annual
apportionment to administer, plan, and
provide technical assistance for a
funded project. No local share is
required for these program
administrative funds. Funds used under
this program for planning must be
shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with
responsibility for that area.
The Designated Recipient must certify
that: the projects selected were derived
from a locally developed, coordinated
public transit-human services
transportation plan; and, the plan was
developed through a process that
included representatives of public,
private, and nonprofit transportation
and human services providers and
participation by the public, including
those representing the needs of welfare
recipients and eligible low-income
individuals. The locally developed,
coordinated public transit-human
services transportation planning process
must be coordinated and consistent
with the metropolitan and statewide
planning processes and funding for the
program must included in the
metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity
or aggregation consistent with State and
local policies and procedures. Finally,
the State must certify that allocations of
the grant to subrecipients are made on
a fair and equitable basis.
The coordinated planning
requirement is also a requirement in two
additional programs. Projects selected
for funding under the Section 5310
program and the JARC program are also
required to be derived from a locally
developed coordinated public transithuman service transportation plan. FTA
anticipates that most areas will develop
one consolidated plan for all the
programs, which may include separate
elements and other human service
transportation programs.
The New Freedom program is subject
to the relevant requirements of Section
5307, but certification of labor
protections is not required. New
Freedom Program requirements are
published in FTA Circular 9045.1,
which was effective May 1, 2007. The
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
circular and other guidance including
frequently asked questions are posted
on the FTA Web site at
https://www.fta.dot.gov.
4. Period of Availability
FTA has established a consistent
three-year period of availability for New
Freedom, JARC, and the Section 5310
program funds, which includes the year
of apportionment plus two additional
years. FY 2010 funding is available for
obligation through FY 2012. Any
funding that remains unobligated on
September 30, 2012 will revert to FTA
for reapportionment among the States
and large UZAs to be used for New
Freedom program purposes.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. Designated Recipient. FTA must
have received formal notification from
the Governor or Governor’s designee of
the Designated Recipient for New
Freedom funds apportioned to a State or
large UZA before awarding a grant to
that area for New Freedom projects.
b. Transfers to Section 5307 or 5311.
States may transfer New Freedom funds
to Section 5307 or Section 5311, but
only for projects competitively selected
under the New Freedom program, not as
a general supplement for those
programs. FTA anticipates that the
States would use this flexibility for
projects to be implemented by a Section
5307 recipient in a small urbanized area
or for Federally recognized Indian
Tribes that elect to receive funds as a
direct recipient from FTA under Section
5311. FTA has established a scope code
(647) to track New Freedom projects
included within a Section 5307 or 5311
grant. All activities within a Section
5307 or Section 5311 grant application
that are funded with New Freedom
resources should be listed under the
647–00 scope code. Transfer to Section
5307 or 5311 is permitted but not
required. FTA also will award standalone New Freedom Program grants to
the State for any and all subrecipients.
In order to track disbursements
accurately against the appropriate
program, FTA will not combine New
Freedom funds with Section 5307 funds
in a single Section 5307 grant, nor will
FTA combine New Freedom with JARC
funds in a single Section 5307 grant.
O. Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks
Program (49 U.S.C. 5320)
The Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks
Program (Transit in Parks), formally the
Alternative Transportation in Parks and
Public Lands (ATPPL) Program, is
administered by FTA in partnership
with the Department of the Interior
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
7063
(DOI) and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s Forest Service. The
purpose of the program is to enhance
the protection of national parks and
Federal lands, and increase the
enjoyment of those visiting them. The
Program funds capital and planning
expenses for alternative transportation
systems such as buses and trams in
Federally-managed parks and public
lands. Federal land management
agencies and State, tribal and local
governments acting with the consent of
a Federal land management agency are
eligible to apply.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 makes $11,129,000 available
for the program in FY 2010. After
deduction of 0.5 percent for program
management oversight, $11,073,355
remains available for project allocations.
Up to ten percent of the funds may be
reserved for planning, research, and
technical assistance. FTA will publish a
Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA)
in the Federal Register inviting
applications for projects to be funded in
FY 2010.
PAUL S. SARBANES TRANSIT IN PARKS
Total Appropriation ...............
Oversight (0.5 percent) .........
$11,129,000
¥$55,645
Total Available ..................
$11,073,355
2. Program Requirements
Projects are competitively selected
based on criteria specified in the Notice
of Funding Availability. The terms and
conditions applicable to the program are
also specified in the NOFA. Projects
must conserve natural, historical, and
cultural resources, reduce congestion
and pollution, and improve visitor
mobility and accessibility. By statute, no
more than 25 percent of the amount
provided may be allocated for any one
project.
3. Period of Availability
The funds under the Transit in Parks
Program remain available until
expended.
P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49
U.S.C. 5339)
The Alternatives Analysis Program
provides grants to States, authorities of
the States, metropolitan planning
organizations, and local government
authorities to develop studies as part of
the transportation planning process.
These studies include an assessment of
a wide range of public transportation
alternatives designed to address a
transportation problem in a corridor or
subarea; sufficient information to enable
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7064
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
the Secretary to make the findings of
project justification and local financial
commitment required under the Major
Capital Investment Program; the
selection of a locally preferred
alternative; and the adoption of the
locally preferred alternative as part of
the state or regional long-range
transportation plan. For more
information about this program contact
Sherry Riklin, Office of Planning and
Environment, at (202) 366–4033.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
CR 2010 provides $10,343,000 to the
Alternatives Analysis Program (49
U.S.C. 5339). FY 2010 available project
allocations are shown in Table 19.
grant for eligible purposes by September
30, 2012 will be redistributed.
4. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Table 20 lists prior year carryover of
$32,600,250 for Alternatives Analysis
projects allocated project funding in FY
2008 and FY 2009. This amount
includes $10,094,000 for FY 2008 and
$22,506,250 for FY 2009. The carryover
amount for FY 2009 includes $9,811,875
in unallocated funds. Decisions
regarding the distribution of unallocated
Section 5339 funding will be made by
FTA at a later date.
Q. Growing States and High Density
States Formula Factors (49 U.S.C. 5340)
CR 2010 makes $192,371,000
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PROGRAM
available for apportionment in
accordance with the formula factors
Total Apportioned .................
$10,343,000 prescribed for Growing States and High
Density States set forth in 49 U.S.C.
2. Requirements
5340. Fifty percent of this amount
($96,185,000) is apportioned to eligible
Alternatives Analysis program funds
States and urbanized areas using the
may be made available to States,
Growing State formula factors. The
authorities of the States, metropolitan
other 50 percent ($96,185,000) is
planning organizations, and local
apportioned to eligible States and
governmental authorities. The
urbanized areas using the High Density
Government’s share of the cost of an
States formula factors.
activity funded may not exceed 80
The term ‘‘State’’ is defined only to
percent of the cost of the activity. The
mean the 50 States. For the Growing
funds will be awarded as separate
State portion of the program, funds are
Section 5339 grants. The grant
allocated based on the population
requirements will be comparable to
forecasts for fifteen years after the date
those for Section 5309 grants. Eligible
of that census. Forecasts are based on
projects include planning and corridor
the trend between the most recent
studies, which lay the foundation for
decennial census and Census Bureau
the adoption of locally preferred
population estimates for the most
alternatives within the fiscally
current year. Census population
constrained Metropolitan
Transportation Plan for that area. Funds estimates as of December 27, 2007 were
used in the FY 2010 apportionments.
awarded under the Alternatives
Analysis Program must be shown in the Funds allocated to the States are then
sub-allocated to urbanized and nonUPWP for MPO(s) with responsibility
urbanized areas based on forecast
for that area. Pre-award authority for
population, where available. If
Section 5339 funds applies to projects
forecasted population data at the
only after Congress appropriates funds
for these projects and the allocations are urbanized level is not available, as is
currently the case, funds are allocated to
published in an FTA notice of
current urbanized and non-urbanized
apportionments and allocations. For
more information on preaward authority areas on the basis of current population
in the 2000 Census. Funds allocated to
see Section V of this notice.
urbanized areas are included in their
Unless otherwise specified in law,
Section 5307 apportionment. Funds
grants made under the Alternatives
allocated for non-urbanized areas are
Analysis program must meet all other
included in the states’ Section 5311
eligibility requirements as outlined in
apportionments.
Section 5309.
R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
3. Period of Availability
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 Note)
By statute, funds designated for
The Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
specific Alternatives Analysis Program
(OTRB) Program authorizes FTA to
projects remain available for obligation
make grants to operators of over-thefor three fiscal years, which includes the road buses to help finance the
year of allocation plus two additional
incremental capital and training costs of
fiscal years. FY 2010 Alternatives
complying with the DOT over-the-road
Analysis funds not obligated in an FTA
bus accessibility final rule, 49 CFR part
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
37, published on September 28, 1998
(63 FR 51670). FTA conducts a national
solicitation of applications, and grantees
are selected on a competitive basis. For
more information about the OTRB
program contact Blenda Younger, Office
of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. Funding Availability in FY 2010
CR 2010 provides $3,641,000 for the
Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility (OTRB)
Program, which is the total amount
allocable for OTRB, as shown in the
table below.
OVER-THE-ROAD BUS ACCESSIBILITY
PROGRAM
Total Apportioned .................
$3,641,000
Of this amount, $2,730,750 is
allocable to providers of intercity fixedroute service, and $910,250 to other
providers of over-the-road bus services,
including local fixed-route service,
commuter service, and charter and tour
service.
2. Program Requirements
Projects are competitively selected.
The Federal share of the project is 90
percent of net project cost. Program
guidance is provided in the Federal
Register notice soliciting applications.
Assistance under the program is
available to private operators of overthe-road buses that are used
substantially or exclusively in intercity,
fixed route and over-the-road bus
service. Assistance is also available to
private operators of over-the-road buses
in other services, such as charter, tour,
and commuter service. Capital projects
eligible for funding include projects to
add lifts and other accessibility
components to new vehicle purchases
and to purchase lifts to retrofit existing
vehicles. Eligible training costs include
developing training materials or
providing training for local providers of
over-the-road bus services. A
comprehensive listing of program
requirements is published annually in
the OTRB Program Notice of Funding
Availability (NOFA).
3. Period of Availability
FTA has observed that some private
operators selected to receive funding
under this program have not acted
promptly to obligate the funds in a grant
and request reimbursement for
expenditures. While the program does
not have a statutory period of
availability, in the FY 2008
Apportionment Notice, FTA published
its intention to limit the period of
availability to a selected operator to
three years, which includes the year of
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
allocation plus two additional years.
Accordingly, funds for projects selected
in FY 2006 or prior years are no longer
available for obligation in a grant and
will be reallocated in the competition
for FY 2009 funds. FY 2007 and FY
2008 funds were allocated on August
22, 2008 and will be reallocated if not
obligated in a grant by September 30,
2010. Funds for project selections
announced in FY 2010 will be
reallocated if not obligated in a grant by
September 30, 2012.
4. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
FTA will publish a NOFA soliciting
applications for FY 2010 in a
subsequent notice once the full funding
level is made available to the program.
The notice will be available at https://
www.fta.dot.gov/laws/
leg_reg_federal_register.html.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
S. Transit Investments for Greenhouse
Gas and Energy Reduction
The Appropriations Act 2010
provides $75,000,000 to continue the
Transit Investments for Greenhouse Gas
and Energy Reduction (TIGGER)
program. TIGGER, initially funded
under the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, provides
grants to public transit agencies for
capital investments that will reduce the
energy consumption or greenhouse gas
emissions of their public transportation
systems. As required by the
Appropriations Act 2010, FTA will
publish a Notice of Funding Availability
in the Federal Register on or after
March 18, 2010, announcing program
requirements and soliciting project
proposals. FTA will announce project
selections on or after September 15,
2010.
T. Washington Metropolitan Area
Transit Authority Grants
Section 601 of the Passenger Rail
Investment and Improvement Act of
2008 provides $150,000,000 in funding
for grants to the Washington
Metropolitan Transit Authority,
WMATA, See, Public Law 110–432,
Division B, Title VI., Grants may be
provided for capital and preventive
maintenance expenditures for WMATA
after it has been determined that
WMATA has placed the highest priority
on investments that will improve the
safety of the system, including but not
limited to fixing the track signal system,
replacing 1000 series cars, installing
guarded turnouts, buying equipment for
wayside worker protection, and
installing rollback protection on cars
that are not equipped with the safety
feature. FTA will communicate further
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
program requirements directly to
WMATA.
V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY
2010 Grants
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority To
Incur Project Costs
1. Caution to New Grantees and
Grantees Using Innovative Financing
While we provide pre-award authority
to incur expenses before grant award for
many projects, we recommend that firsttime grant recipients not utilize this
automatic pre-award authority and wait
until the grant is actually awarded by
FTA before incurring costs. As a new
grantee, it is easy to misunderstand preaward authority conditions and not be
aware of all of the applicable FTA
requirements that must be met in order
to be reimbursed for project
expenditures incurred in advance of
grant award. FTA programs have
specific statutory requirements that are
often different from those for other
Federal grant programs with which new
grantees may be familiar. If funds are
expended for an ineligible project or
activity, FTA will be unable to
reimburse the project sponsor and, in
certain cases, the entire project may be
rendered ineligible for FTA assistance.
Grantees proposing to use innovative
financing techniques or capital leasing
are required to consult with the
applicable FTA Regional Office (see
Appendix A) before entering into the
financial agreement—especially where
the grantee expects to use Federal funds
for debt service or capital lease
payments. Consulting with FTA before
entering into the agreement allows FTA
to advise the project sponsor of any
applicable Federal regulations, such as
the Capital Leasing Regulation, and will
minimize the risk of the costs being
ineligible for reimbursement at a later
date.
2. Policy
FTA provides pre-award authority to
incur expenses before grant award for
certain program areas described below.
This pre-award authority allows
grantees to incur certain project costs
before grant approval and retain the
eligibility of those costs for subsequent
reimbursement after grant approval. The
grantee assumes all risk and is
responsible for ensuring that all
conditions are met to retain eligibility.
This pre-award spending authority
permits a grantee to incur costs on an
eligible transit capital, operating,
planning, or administrative project
without prejudice to possible future
Federal participation in the cost of the
project. In the Federal Register Notice
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
7065
of November 30, 2006, FTA extended
pre-award authority for capital
assistance under all formula programs
through FY 2009, the duration of
SAFETEA–LU. In the FY 2009
Apportionment notice, FTA extended
pre-award authority for formula funds
through FY 2010. In this notice, FTA
extends pre-award authority through FY
2011 for capital assistance under all
formula programs. FTA provides preaward authority for planning and
operating assistance under the formula
programs without regard to the period of
the authorization. In addition, we
extend pre-award authority for certain
discretionary programs based on the
annual Appropriations Act each year.
All pre-award authority is subject to
conditions and triggers stated below:
a. FTA does not impose additional
conditions on pre-award authority for
operating, planning, or administrative
assistance under the formula grant
programs. Grantees may be reimbursed
for expenses incurred before grant
award so long as funds have been
expended in accordance with all
Federal requirements. In addition to
cross-cutting Federal grant
requirements, program specific
requirements must be met. For example,
a planning project must have been
included in a Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP); a New Freedom
operating assistance project or a JARC
planning or operating project must have
been derived from a coordinated public
transit-human services transportation
plan (coordinated plan) and
competitively selected by the
Designated Recipient before incurring
expenses; expenditure on State
Administration expenses under State
Administered programs must be
consistent with the State Management
Plan. Designated Recipients for JARC
and New Freedom have pre-award
authority for the ten percent of the
apportionment they may use for
program administration, if the use is
consistent with their Program
Management Plan.
b. Pre-Award authority for
Alternatives Analysis planning projects
under 49 U.S.C. 5339 is triggered by the
publication of the allocation in FTA’s
Federal Register Notice of
Apportionments and Allocations
following the annual Appropriations
Act, or announcement of additional
discretionary allocations. The projects
must be included in the UPWP of the
MPO for that metropolitan area.
c. Pre-award authority for design and
environmental work on a capital project
is triggered by the authorization of
formula funds, or the appropriation of
funds for a discretionary project.
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7066
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
d. Following authorization of formula
funds or appropriation and publication
of discretionary projects, pre-award
authority for capital project
implementation activities, such as
property acquisition, demolition,
construction, and acquisition of
vehicles, equipment, or construction
materials, may be exercised only after
FTA concurs that all applicable
environmental requirements have been
satisfied, including those for actions
classified as normally requiring
preparation of environmental impact
statements, environmental assessments,
and categorical exclusions found in 23
CFR 771.117(d). Other conditions and
requirements set forth in paragraph 3,
below, must also be satisfied. Before
exercising pre-award authority, grantees
must comply with the conditions and
Federal requirements outlined in
paragraph 3 below. Failure to do so will
render an otherwise eligible project
ineligible for FTA financial assistance.
Capital projects under the Section 5310,
JARC, and New Freedom programs must
comply with specific program
requirements, including coordinated
planning and competitive selection. In
addition, before incurring costs,
grantees are strongly encouraged to
consult with the appropriate FTA
regional office regarding the eligibility
of the project for future FTA funds and
the applicability of the conditions and
Federal requirements.
e. As a general rule, pre-award
authority applies to the Section 5309
Capital Investment Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities, the Clean Fuels Bus program,
high priority project designations, and
any other transit discretionary projects
designated in SAFETEA–LU only
AFTER funds have been appropriated.
Pre-award authority is currently
extended for FY 2008 and FY 2009
discretionary project funding and to
discretionary allocations extended or
reprogrammed under the SAFETEA–LU
Technical Corrections Act of 2008, as of
June 6, 2008. For Section 5309 Capital
Investment Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities, Clean Fuels Program, or other
transit capital discretionary projects
such as those designated in an annual
Appropriations Act, the date that costs
may be incurred is: (1) For design and
environmental review, the
appropriations bill which funds the
project was enacted; and (2) for property
acquisition, demolition, construction,
and acquisition of vehicles, equipment,
or construction materials, the date that
FTA approves the document (ROD,
FONSI, or CE determination) that
completes the environmental review
process required by the National
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
its implementing regulations. FTA
introduced this new trigger for preaward authority in FY 2006 in
recognition of the growing prevalence of
new grantees unfamiliar with Federal
and FTA requirements to ensure FTA’s
continued ability to comply with NEPA
and related environmental laws.
Because FTA does not sign a final NEPA
document until MPO and statewide
planning requirements (including air
quality conformity requirements, if
applicable) have been satisfied, this new
trigger for pre-award will ensure
compliance with both planning and
environmental requirements before
irreversible action by the grantee.
f. In previous notices, FTA extended
pre-award authority to Section 330
projects referenced in the DOT
Appropriation Act, 2002, and the
Consolidated Appropriations
Resolution, 2003 and to those surface
transportation projects commonly
referred to as Section 115 projects
administered by FTA, for which
amounts were provided in the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004,
Section 117 projects in the 2005
Appropriations Act, and Section 112 of
the 2006 Appropriations Act that are to
be administered by FTA. FTA, in the FY
2008 Apportionment Notice, extended
pre-award authority to high priority
projects in SAFETEA–LU, as of the date
they were transferred or allotted to FTA
for administration. The same conditions
described for bus projects apply to these
projects. We strongly encourage any
prospective applicant that does not have
a previous relationship with FTA to
review Federal grant requirements with
the FTA regional office before incurring
costs.
g. Blanket pre-award authority does
not apply to Section 5309 Capital
Investment New Starts funds. Specific
instances of pre-award authority for
Capital Investment New Starts projects
are described in paragraph 4 below. Preaward authority does not apply to
Capital Investment Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities or Clean Fuels projects
authorized for funding beyond this
fiscal year. Before an applicant may
incur costs for Capital Investment New
Starts projects, Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities projects, or any other projects
not yet published in a notice of
apportionments and allocations, it must
first obtain a written Letter of No
Prejudice (LONP) from FTA. To obtain
an LONP, a grantee must submit a
written request accompanied by
adequate information and justification
to the appropriate FTA regional office,
as described below.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
h. Blanket pre-award authority does
not apply to Section 5314 National
Research Programs. Before an applicant
may incur costs for National Research
Programs, it must first obtain a written
Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) from
FTA. To obtain an LONP, a grantee must
submit a written request accompanied
by adequate information and
justification to the appropriate FTA
headquarters office. Information about
LONP procedures may be obtained from
the appropriate headquarters office.
3. Conditions
The conditions under which preaward authority may be utilized are
specified below:
a. Pre-award authority is not a legal or
implied commitment that the subject
project will be approved for FTA
assistance or that FTA will obligate
Federal funds. Furthermore, it is not a
legal or implied commitment that all
items undertaken by the applicant will
be eligible for inclusion in the project.
b. All FTA statutory, procedural, and
contractual requirements must be met.
c. No action will be taken by the
grantee that prejudices the legal and
administrative findings that the Federal
Transit Administrator must make in
order to approve a project.
d. Local funds expended by the
grantee pursuant to and after the date of
the pre-award authority will be eligible
for credit toward local match or
reimbursement if FTA later makes a
grant or grant amendment for the
project. Local funds expended by the
grantee before the date of the pre-award
authority will not be eligible for credit
toward local match or reimbursement.
Furthermore, the expenditure of local
funds on activities such as land
acquisition, demolition, or construction
before the date of pre-award authority
for those activities (i.e., the completion
of the NEPA process) would
compromise FTA’s ability to comply
with Federal environmental laws and
may render the project ineligible for
FTA funding.
e. The Federal amount of any future
FTA assistance awarded to the grantee
for the project will be determined on the
basis of the overall scope of activities
and the prevailing statutory provisions
with respect to the Federal/local match
ratio at the time the funds are obligated.
f. For funds to which the pre-award
authority applies, the authority expires
with the lapsing of the fiscal year funds.
g. When a grant for the project is
subsequently awarded, the Financial
Status Report, in TEAM–Web, must
indicate the use of pre-award authority.
h. Environmental, Planning, and
Other Federal Requirements.
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
All Federal grant requirements must be
met at the appropriate time for the
project to remain eligible for Federal
funding. The growth of the Federal
transit program has resulted in a
growing number of inexperienced
grantees who make compliance with
Federal planning and environmental
laws increasingly challenging. FTA has
therefore modified its approach to preaward authority to use the completion
of the NEPA process, which has as a
prerequisite the completion of planning
and air quality requirements, as the
trigger for pre-award authority for all
activities except design and
environmental review.
i. The requirement that a project be
included in a locally adopted
metropolitan transportation plan, the
metropolitan transportation
improvement program and Federallyapproved statewide transportation
improvement program (23 CFR part 450)
must be satisfied before the grantee may
advance the project beyond planning
and preliminary design with nonFederal funds under pre-award
authority. If the project is located within
an EPA-designated non-attainment area
for air quality, the conformity
requirements of the Clean Air Act, 40
CFR part 93, must also be met before the
project may be advanced into
implementation-related activities under
pre-award authority. Compliance with
NEPA and other environmental laws
and executive orders (e.g., protection of
parklands, wetlands, and historic
properties) must be completed before
State or local funds are spent on
implementation activities, such as site
preparation, construction, and
acquisition, for a project that is expected
to be subsequently funded with FTA
funds. The grantee may not advance the
project beyond planning and
preliminary design before FTA has
determined the project to be a
categorical exclusion, or has issued a
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) or an environmental Record of
Decision (ROD), in accordance with
FTA environmental regulations, 23 CFR
part 771. For planning projects, the
project must be included in a locallyapproved Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP) that has been
coordinated with the State.
j. In addition, Federal procurement
procedures, as well as the whole range
of applicable Federal requirements (e.g.,
Buy America, Davis-Bacon Act,
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise)
must be followed for projects in which
Federal funding will be sought in the
future. Failure to follow any such
requirements could make the project
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
ineligible for Federal funding. In short,
this increased administrative flexibility
requires a grantee to make certain that
no Federal requirements are
circumvented through the use of preaward authority. If a grantee has
questions or concerns regarding the
environmental requirements, or any
other Federal requirements that must be
met before incurring costs, it should
contact the appropriate regional office.
4. Pre-Award Authority for New Starts
Projects
a. Preliminary Engineering (PE) and
Final Design (FD). Projects proposed for
Section 5309 New Starts funds are
required to follow a Federally defined
New Starts project development
process. This New Starts process
includes, among other things, FTA
approval of the entry of the project into
PE and into FD. In accordance with
Section 5309(d), FTA considers the
merits of the project, the strength of its
financial plan, and its readiness to enter
the next phase in deciding whether or
not to approve entry into PE or FD.
Upon FTA approval to enter PE, FTA
extends pre-award authority to incur
costs for PE activities. Upon completion
of NEPA, FTA extends pre-award
authority to incur costs for utility
relocation, as well as real property
acquisition and vehicle purchases,
which are further addressed below.
Upon FTA approval to enter FD, FTA
extends pre-award authority to incur
costs for FD activities, demolition, and
non-construction activities such as
procurement of long-lead time items or
items for which market conditions play
a significant role in the acquisition
price. This includes, but is not limited
to procurement of rails, ties, and other
specialized equipment, and
commodities. Please contact the FTA
Regional Office for a determination of
activities not listed here, but which
meet the intent described above. Upon
FTA approval to enter FD, FTA extends
pre-award authority to incur costs for
FD activities. The pre-award authority
for each phase is automatic upon FTA’s
signing of a letter to the project sponsor
approving entry into that phase. PE and
FD are defined in the New Starts
regulation entitled Major Capital
Investment Projects, found at 49 CFR
part 611.
b. Real Property Acquisition
Activities and Vehicle Purchases. FTA
extends automatic pre-award authority
for the acquisition of real property, real
property rights and acquisition of
vehicles for a New Starts project upon
completion of the NEPA process for that
project. The NEPA process is completed
when FTA signs an environmental
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
7067
Record of Decision (ROD) or Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI), or
makes a Categorical Exclusion (CE)
determination. With the limitations and
caveats described below, real estate
acquisition and vehicle purchases for a
New Starts project may commence, at
the project sponsor’s risk, upon
completion of the NEPA process.
For FTA-assisted projects, any
acquisition of real property or real
property rights must be conducted in
accordance with the requirements of the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act (URA)
and its implementing regulations, 49
CFR part 24. This pre-award authority is
strictly limited to costs incurred: (i) to
acquire real property and real property
rights in accordance with the URA
regulation, and (ii) to provide relocation
assistance in accordance with the URA
regulation. This pre-award authority is
limited to the acquisition of real
property and real property rights that
are explicitly identified in the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS),
environmental assessment (EA), or CE
document, as needed for the selected
alternative that is the subject of the
FTA-signed ROD or FONSI, or CE
determination. This pre-award authority
regarding property acquisition that is
granted at the completion of NEPA does
not cover site preparation, demolition,
or any other activity that is not strictly
necessary to comply with the URA, with
one exception. That exception is when
a building that has been acquired, has
been emptied of its occupants, and
awaits demolition poses a potential firesafety hazard or other hazard to the
community in which it is located, or is
susceptible to reoccupation by vagrants.
Demolition of the building is also
covered by this pre-award authority
upon FTA’s written agreement that the
adverse condition exists.
Pre-award authority for property
acquisition is also provided when FTA
makes a CE determination for a
protective buy or hardship acquisition
in accordance with 23 CFR
771.117(d)(12), and when FTA makes a
CE determination for the acquisition of
a pre-existing railroad right-of-way in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5324(c).
When a tiered environmental review in
accordance with 23 CFR 771.111(g) is
being used, pre-award authority is NOT
provided upon completion of the firsttier environmental document except
when the Tier-1 ROD or FONSI signed
by FTA explicitly provides such preaward authority for a particular
identified acquisition.
Project sponsors should use preaward authority for real property
acquisition relocation assistance, and
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7068
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
vehicle purchases very carefully, with a
clear understanding that it does not
constitute a funding commitment by
FTA. FTA provides pre-award authority
upon completion of the NEPA process
for real property acquisition and
relocation assistance to maximize the
time available to project sponsors to
move people out of their homes and
places of business, in accordance with
the requirements of the Uniform
Relocation Act, but also with maximum
sensitivity to the plight of the people so
affected. FTA provides pre-award
authority upon the completion of the
NEPA process for vehicles purchases in
recognition of the long-lead time and
complexity of this activity as well as its
relationship to the ‘‘critical path’’ project
schedule. FTA cautions grantees that do
not currently operate the type of vehicle
proposed in the New Starts project
about exercising this pre-award
authority and encourages these sponsors
to wait until later in the project
development process when project
plans are more fully developed and
Federal support for the project is more
certain. FTA reminds project sponsors
that the procurement of vehicles must
comply with all Federal requirements
including, but not limited to,
competitive procurement practices, the
Americans with Disabilities Act, and
Buy America. FTA encourages project
sponsors to discuss the procurement of
vehicles with FTA in regards to Federal
requirements before exercising preaward authority.
Although FTA provides pre-award
authority for property acquisition and
vehicle purchases upon completion of
the NEPA process, FTA will not make
a grant to reimburse the sponsor for real
estate activities conducted under preaward authority until the project has
been approved into FD. FTA will only
reimburse the sponsor for vehicle
purchases through an executed Full
Funding Grant Agreement. This is to
ensure that Federal funds are not risked
on a project whose advancement beyond
PE into FD and construction is still not
yet assured.
c. National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Activities. NEPA requires that
major projects proposed for FTA
funding assistance be subjected to a
public and interagency review of the
need for the project, its environmental
and community impacts, and
alternatives to avoid and reduce adverse
impacts. Projects of more limited scope
also need a level of environmental
review, either to support an FTA finding
of no significant impact (FONSI) or to
demonstrate that the action is
categorically excluded from the more
rigorous level of NEPA review.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
FTA’s regulation titled
‘‘Environmental Impact and Related
Procedures,’’ at 23 CFR part 771 states
that the costs incurred by a grant
applicant for the preparation of
environmental documents requested by
FTA are eligible for FTA financial
assistance (23 CFR 771.105(e)).
Accordingly, FTA extends pre-award
authority for costs incurred to comply
with NEPA regulations and to conduct
NEPA-related activities for a proposed
New Starts or Small Starts project,
effective as of the date of the Federal
approval of the relevant STIP or STIP
amendment that includes the project or
any phase of the project. NEPA-related
activities include, but are not limited to,
public involvement activities, historic
preservation reviews, section 4(f)
evaluations, wetlands evaluations,
endangered species consultations, and
biological assessments. This pre-award
authority is strictly limited to costs
incurred to conduct the NEPA process,
and to prepare environmental, historic
preservation and related documents. It
does not cover PE activities beyond
those necessary for NEPA compliance.
For many FTA programs, costs
incurred by a grant applicant exercising
pre-award authority in the preparation
of environmental documents required
by FTA are eligible for FTA
reimbursement (See also 23 CFR
771.105(e)). FTA assistance for
environmental documents for New
Starts and Small Starts projects,
however, is subject to certain
restrictions. Under SAFETEA–LU,
Section 5309 New Starts funds cannot
be used for any activity, including a
NEPA-related activity that occurs before
the approval of a New Starts project into
PE or a Small Starts project into Project
Development (PD). Section 5339
(Alternatives analysis program), Section
5307 (Urbanized Area Formula Program)
and flexible highway funds are available
for NEPA work conducted before PE
approval (for New Starts) or PD
approval (for Small Starts). Section 5309
New Starts funds, however, as well as
Section 5307 (Urban Formula program)
and flexible highway funds, can be used
for NEPA work conducted after PE
approval (for New Starts) or PD
approval (for Small Starts). NEPArelated activities include, but are not
limited to, public involvement
activities, historic preservation reviews,
section 4(f) evaluations, wetlands
evaluations, endangered species
consultations, and biological
assessments. As with any pre-award
authority, FTA reimbursement for costs
incurred is not guaranteed.
d. Other New Starts Activities
Requiring Letter of No Prejudice
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(LONP). Except as discussed in
paragraphs a through c above, a grant
applicant must obtain a written LONP
from FTA before incurring costs for any
activity expected to be funded by New
Start funds not yet awarded. To obtain
an LONP, an applicant must submit a
written request accompanied by
adequate information and justification
to the appropriate FTA regional office,
as described in B below.
5. Pre-Award Authority for Small Starts
When FTA issues a Project
Development approval letter for a Small
Starts project, FTA grants pre-award
authority for the engineering and design
activities necessary to complete NEPA.
Upon FTA’s issuance of a Record of
Decision (ROD), a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI), or a
Categorical Exclusion (CE)
determination, pre-award authority is
granted to incur costs for all other
project engineering activities including
right-of-way acquisition, utility
relocation, and vehicle purchases.
Because Small Starts projects are not
subject to approval into a final design
phase, they are not granted pre-award
authority for procurement of rails, ties,
and other specialized equipment; the
procurement of commodities; and
demolition.
When FTA issues a Project
Construction Grant Agreement (PCGA),
FTA grants pre-award authority for the
construction phase of the project. Preaward authority for NEPA-related work
on a Small Starts project is described in
paragraph 4.c above. Pre-award
authority for real property acquisition
activities and vehicle purchases for a
Small Starts project is granted under the
same conditions and for the same
reasons as for New Starts projects, as
described in paragraph 4.b above.
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
1. Policy
LONP authority allows an applicant
to incur costs on a project utilizing nonFederal resources, with the
understanding that the costs incurred
subsequent to the issuance of the LONP
may be reimbursable as eligible
expenses or eligible for credit toward
the local match should FTA approve the
project at a later date. LONPs are
applicable to projects and project
activities not covered by automatic preaward authority. The majority of LONPs
will be for Section 5309 New Starts or
Small Starts projects undertaking
activities not covered under automatic
pre-award authority, a full funding grant
agreement (FFGA) or a PCGA, or for
Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
the issuance of LONPs for New and
Small Starts projects, when appropriate,
by no longer performing a detailed
review of the cost and scope of the
request in every instance. Rather, a
limited review will be performed in
those cases that are of a more routine
nature, especially those involving an
experienced sponsor.
2. Conditions and Federal Requirements
The conditions for pre-award
authority specified in section V.A.2
above apply to all LONPs. The
Environmental, Planning and Other
Federal Requirements described in
section V.A.3 also apply to all LONPs.
Because project implementation
activities may not be initiated before
NEPA completion, FTA will not issue
an LONP for such activities until the
NEPA process has been completed with
a ROD, FONSI, or Categorical Exclusion
determination.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
projects authorized but not yet
appropriated by Congress. LONPs may
be issued for formula and discretionary
funds beyond the life of the current
authorization or FTA’s extension of
automatic pre-award authority;
however, the LONP is limited to a fiveyear period, unless otherwise
authorized.
C. FTA FY 2010 Annual List of
Certifications and Assurances
The full text of the FY 2010
Certifications and Assurances was
published in the Federal Register on
October 19, 2009, and is available on the
FTA Web site and in TEAM–Web. The
FY 2010 Certifications and Assurances
must be used for all grants made in FY
2010, including obligation of carryover
funds. All grantees with active grants
are required to have signed the FY 2010
Certifications and Assurances within 90
days after publication. Any questions
regarding this document may be
addressed to the appropriate Regional
Office or to Nydia Picayo, in the FTA
Office of Program Management, at (202)
366–1662.
3. Request for LONP
Before incurring costs for a project not
covered by automatic pre-award
authority, the project sponsor must first
submit a written request for an LONP,
accompanied by adequate information
and justification, to the appropriate
regional office and obtain written
approval from FTA. FTA approval of an
LONP for a New Starts or Small Starts
project is determined on a case-by-case
basis. Federal funding for a New or
Small Starts project is not implied or
guaranteed by an LONP. Specifically,
when requesting an LONP, the applicant
shall provide sufficient information to
allow FTA to consider the following
items:
a. Description of the activities to be
covered by the LONP.
b. Justification for advancing the
identified activities. The justification
should include an accurate assessment
of the consequences to the project
scope, schedule, and budget should the
LONP not be approved.
c. Allocated level of risk and
contingency for the activity requested.
d. Status of procurement progress,
including, if appropriate, submittal of
bids for the activities covered by the
LONP.
e. Strength of the capital and
operating financial plan for the New
Starts project and the future transit
system.
f. Adequacy of the Project
Management Plan.
g. Resolution of any readiness issues
that would affect the project, such as
land acquisition and technical capacity
to carry out the project.
FTA will, following the completion of
the requirements under NEPA, expedite
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit
Purposes
SAFETEA–LU continues provisions
in the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
(ISTEA) and TEA–21 that expanded
modal choice in transportation funding
by including substantial flexibility to
transfer funds between FTA and FHWA
formula program funding categories.
The provisions also allow for transfer of
certain discretionary program funds for
administration of highway projects by
FHWA and transit projects by FTA. FTA
and FHWA execute Flex Funding
Transfers between the Formula and Bus
Grants Transit programs and the Federal
Aid Highway programs. This also
includes the transfer of Metropolitan
and Statewide planning set-aside funds
between FHWA and FTA to be
combined with metropolitan and
statewide planning resources as
Consolidated Planning Grants (CPG).
These transfers are based on a State’s
requests to transfer funding from the
Highway and/or Transit programs to
fund States and local project priorities,
and joint planning needs. This practice
can result in transfers to the Federal
Transit Program from the Federal Aid
Highway Program or vice versa.
1. Transfer Process for Funds
SAFETEA–LU was signed into law on
August 10, 2005. With the enactment of
SAFETEA–LU, beginning in FY2006,
with few exceptions, Federal transit
programs were funded solely from
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
7069
general funds or trust funds. The transit
formula and bus grant programs are now
funded from Mass Transit Account of
the Highway Trust Fund. The Formula
and Bus Grant Programs can also receive
flex funding transfers from the Federal
Aid Highway Program.
As a result of the changes to program
funding mechanisms, there is no longer
a requirement to transfer budget
authority and liquidating cash resources
simultaneously upon the execution of a
flex funding transfer request by a State.
Since the transfers are between trust
fund accounts, the only requirement is
to transfer budget authority (obligation
limitation) between the Federal Aid
Program trust fund account and the
Federal Transit Formula and Bus Grant
Program account. At the point in time
that the obligation resulting from the
transfer of budgetary authority is
expended, a transfer of liquidating cash
will be required.
Beginning in FY 2007, the accounting
process was changed for transfers of flex
funds and other specific programs to
allow budget authority to be transferred
and the cash to be transferred
separately. FTA requires that flexed
fund transfers to FTA be in separate and
identifiable grants in order to ensure
that the draw-down of flexed funds can
be tracked, thus securing the internal
controls for monitoring these resources
from the Federal Highway
Administration to avoid deficiencies in
FTA’s Formula and Bus Grants account.
FTA monitors the expenditures of
flexed funded grants and requests the
transfer of liquidating cash from FHWA
to ensure sufficient funds are available
to meet expenditures. To facilitate
tracking of grantees’ flex funding
expenditures, FTA developed codes to
provide distinct identification of ‘‘flex
funds.’’
The process for transferring flexible
funds between FTA and FHWA
programs is described below. Note that
the new transfer process for ‘‘flex funds’’
that began in FY 2007 does not apply to
the transfer of State planning set-aside
funds from FHWA to FTA to be
combined with metropolitan and
statewide planning resources as
Consolidated Planning Grants (CPG).
These transfers are based on States
requests to transfer funding from the
Highway and/or Transit programs to
fund States and local project priorities,
and joint planning needs. Planning
funds transferred will be allowed to be
merged in a single grant with FTA
planning resources using the same
process implemented in FY 2006. For
information on the process for the
transfer of funds between FTA and
FHWA planning programs refer to
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7070
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
section IV.A and B. Note also that
certain prior year appropriations
earmarks (Sections 330, 115, 117, and
112) are allotted annually for
administration rather than being
transferred. For information regarding
these procedures, please contact Nancy
Grubb, FTA Budget Office, at (202) 366–
1635; or FHWA Budget Division, at
(202) 366–2845.
a. Transfer From FHWA to FTA
FHWA funds transferred to FTA are
used primarily for transit capital
projects and eligible operating activities
that have been designated as part of the
metropolitan and statewide planning
and programming process. The project
must be included in an approved STIP
before the funds can be transferred. By
letter, the State DOT requests the FHWA
Division Office to transfer highway
funds for a transit project. The letter
should specify the project, amount to be
transferred, apportionment year, State,
urbanized area, Federal aid
apportionment category (i.e., Surface
Transportation Program (STP),
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
(CMAQ) or identification of the earmark
and indication of the intended FTA
formula program (i.e., Section 5307,
5311 or 5310) and should include a
description of the project as contained
in the STIP. Note that FTA may also
administer certain transfers of statutory
earmarks under the Section 5309 bus
program, for tracking purposes.
The FHWA Division Office confirms
that the apportionment amount is
available for transfer and concurs in the
transfer, by letter to the State DOT and
FTA. The FHWA Office of Budget and
Finance then transfers obligation
authority. All FHWA CMAQ and STP
funds transferred to FTA will be
transferred to one of the three FTA
formula programs (i.e. Urbanized Area
Formula (Section 5307), Nonurbanized
Area Formula (Section 5311) or Elderly
and Persons with Disabilities (Section
5310). High Priority projects in Section
1702 of SAFETEA–LU or Transportation
Improvement projects in Section 1934 of
SAFETEA–LU and other Congressional
earmarks that are transferred to FTA
will be aligned with and administered
through FTA’s discretionary Bus and
Bus Related Facilities Program (Section
5309). The most recent guidance on
transfers of FHWA funds as allowed
under SAFETEA–LU is FHWA
Memorandum, dated July 19, 2007,
‘‘Information Fund Transfers to Other
Agencies and Among Title 23
Programs.’’
The FTA grantee’s application for the
project must specify which program the
funds will be used for, and the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
application must be prepared in
accordance with the requirements and
procedures governing that program.
Upon review and approval of the
grantee’s application, FTA obligates
funds for the project.
Transferred funds are treated as FTA
formula or discretionary funds, except
for local match purposes as described in
c below, but are assigned a distinct
identifying code for tracking purposes.
The funds may be transferred for any
capital purpose eligible under the FTA
formula program to which they are
transferred and, in the case of CMAQ,
for certain operating costs. FHWA
issued revised interim guidance on
project eligibility under the CMAQ
program in a Notice at 71 FR 76038 et
seq. (December 19, 2006) incorporating
changes made by SAFETEA–LU. In
accordance with 23 U.S.C. 104(k), all
FTA requirements except local share,
which remains the same as required
under the FHWA program, are
applicable to transferred funds except in
certain cases when CMAQ funds are
authorized for operating expenses.
Earmarks that are transferred to the
Section 5309 Bus Program for
administration, however, can be used
for the congressionally designated
transit purposes, and in some cases
where the law provides, are not limited
to eligibility under the Bus Program.
In the event that transferred formula
funds are not obligated for the intended
purpose within the period of availability
of the formula program to which they
were transferred, they become available
to the Governor for any eligible capital
transit project. Earmarked funds,
however, can only be used for the
congressionally designated purposes.
b. Transfers From FTA to FHWA
The MPO submits a written request to
the FTA regional office for a transfer of
FTA Section 5307 formula funds
(apportioned to a UZA 200,000 and over
in population) to FHWA based on
approved use of the funds for highway
purposes, as determined by the
designated recipient under Section 5307
and contained in the Governor’s
approved State Transportation
Improvement Program. The MPO must
certify that: (1) Notice and opportunity
for comment and appeal has been
provided to affected transit providers;
(2) the funds are not needed for capital
investments required by the Americans
with Disabilities Act, and (3) local
transit needs are being addressed. The
FTA Regional Administrator reviews
and, if he or she concurs in the request,
then forwards the approval in written
format to FTA Headquarters, where a
reduction equal to the dollar amount
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
being transferred to FHWA is made to
the grantee’s Urbanized Area Formula
Program apportionment.
Transfers of discretionary earmarks
for administration by FHWA are
handled on a case by case basis, by the
FTA regional office, in consultation
with the FTA Office of Program
Management, Office of Chief Counsel,
and Office of Budget and Policy.
c. Matching Share for FHWA Transfers
Section 104(k) of title 23 U.S.C.,
regarding the non-Federal share, apply
to Title 23 funds used for transit
projects. Thus, FHWA funds transferred
to FTA retain the same matching share
that the funds would have if used for
highway purposes and administered by
FHWA.
There are four instances in which a
Federal share higher than 80 percent
would be permitted. First, in States with
large areas of Indian and certain public
domain lands and national forests, parks
and monuments, the local share for
highway projects is determined by a
sliding scale rate, calculated based on
the percentage of public lands within
that State. This sliding scale, which
permits a greater Federal share, but not
to exceed 95 percent, is applicable to
transfers used to fund transit projects in
these public land States. FHWA
develops the sliding scale matching
ratios for the increased Federal share.
Second, commuter carpooling and
vanpooling projects and transit safety
projects using FHWA transfers
administered by FTA may retain the
same 100 percent Federal share that
would be allowed for ride-sharing or
safety projects administered by FHWA.
The third instance is the 100 percent
Federally-funded safety projects;
however, these are subject to a
nationwide 10 percent program
limitation.
The fourth instance occurs with
CMAQ funds. Section 1131 of, The
Energy Independence and Security Act,
2007 (P.L. 11–140) amended 23 U.S.C.
120 increased the Federal share of
CMAQ projects to 100% at the State’s
discretion. FTA will honor this
increased match for CMAQ funds
transferred to FTA for implementation if
the state chooses to fund the project at
a higher Federal share than 80 percent.
The Federal share for CMAQ projects
cannot be lower than 80 percent.
d. Miscellaneous Transit Earmarks in
FHWA Programs
The FY 2002 and FY 2003
Appropriations Acts and accompanying
reports included Section 330, which
identified a number of transit projects
among projects designated to receive
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
funding from certain FHWA funding
sources. The FY 2004 Appropriations
Act similarly included transit projects
among projects designated to receive
funding from certain FHWA sources in
Section 115, the FY 2005
Appropriations Act included a set of
designations under Section 117, and the
FY 2006 Appropriations Act included
designations under Section 112, which
may include some projects that FHWA
will identify to be administered by FTA.
For those projects identified by FHWA
as transit in nature, FHWA allots the
funds to FTA to administer. The funds
are available for the designated project
until obligated and expended. Some of
these FY 2002–2006 designations for
transit projects have not yet been
obligated. However, because these are
FHWA funds, funds for projects
unobligated at the end of the FY are not
automatically available as carry over in
the following fiscal year. Instead, FHWA
re-allots obligation authority to FTA
annually, after reconciling account
balances. Because the requirements and
procedures associated with these
projects differ in some cases from those
for the FTA programs that FTA grantees
are familiar with, and the availability of
funds for obligation by FTA depends on
allotments from FHWA, transit
applicants seeking funding under these
miscellaneous FHWA designations must
work closely with the appropriate FTA
regional office and FHWA Division
Office when applying for a grant under
these designations.
E. Grant Application Procedures
1. Grantees must provide a Dun and
Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number for
inclusion in all applications for a
Federal grant or cooperative agreement.
The DUNS number should be entered
into the grantee profile in TEAM–Web.
Additional information about this and
other Federal grant streamlining
initiatives mandated by the Federal
Financial Assistance Management
Improvement Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106–
107) can be accessed on OMB’s Web site
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants/reform.html.
2. All applications for FTA funds
should be submitted electronically to
the appropriate FTA regional office
through TEAM–Web, an Internetaccessible electronic grant application
system. FTA has provided limited
exceptions to the requirement for
electronic filing of applications.
3. In FY 2010, FTA remains
committed to processing applications
promptly upon receipt of a completed
application by the appropriate regional
office. In order for an application to be
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
considered complete, with the
exception of Recovery Act grants, and
for FTA to assign a grant number,
enabling submission in TEAM–Web, the
following requirements must be met:
a. The project is listed in a currently
approved Metropolitan Transportation
Plan, Metropolitan Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP); FTA
approved Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), or
Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP).
b. All eligibility issues have been
resolved.
c. Required environmental findings
have been made.
d. The project budget’s Activity Line
Items (ALI), scope, and project
description meet FTA requirements.
e. Local share funding source(s) have
been identified.
f. The grantee’s required Civil Rights
submissions are current.
g. Certifications and assurances are
current and properly submitted.
h. Funding is available, including any
flexible funds included in the budget.
i. For projects involving new
construction (using at least $100 million
in New Starts or formula funds), FTA
engineering staff has reviewed the
project management plan and given
approval.
j. When required for grants related to
New Starts projects, entry into PE and/
or FD has been approved.
k. Milestone information is complete,
or FTA determines that milestone
information can be finalized before the
grant is ready for award. The grant must
include sufficient milestones
appropriate to the scale of the project to
allow adequate oversight to monitor the
progress of projects from the start
through completion and closeout.
4. Under most FTA programs, grants
involving funding related to transit
capital and operations must be
submitted to the Department of Labor
(DOL) for certification of labor
protective arrangements before grant
award. Grants under the Nonurbanized
Area Formula Program, Tribal Transit
Program, and Over-the-Road Bus
Program are covered under the special
warranty provision and do not require
certification.
In addition, before FTA can award
grants for discretionary projects and
activities designated by Congress using
FY 2010 or prior funds, notification
must be given to members of Congress.
FTA must give the House and Senate
authorizing and appropriations
committees three days notice before
issuing letters of intent, discretionary
grants, or full funding grant agreements
totaling $500,000 in FY 2009 and FY
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
7071
2008 funds or totaling $1 million or
more in FY 2010 funds.
5. Other important issues that impact
FTA grant processing activities are
discussed below.
a. Change in Budget Structure
Because SAFETEA–LU restructured
FTA’s accounts from split funded
accounts to one solely trust funded
account and three general funded
accounts, FTA does not mix funds from
years before FY 2006 in the same grant
with funds appropriated in FY 2006 and
beyond (except for New Starts and
research grants). Before FY 2006, all
programs were funded approximately 80
percent from MTA of the Highway Trust
Fund and 20 percent from the General
Funds U.S. Treasury. The trust funds
were transferred into the general funded
accounts at the beginning of the year.
Under SAFETEA–LU most programs are
funded entirely from trust funds derived
from the MTA, while the New Starts
and Research programs are funded with
general funds. For a New Starts or
research project, any prior year funds
currently available for obligation and FY
2010 funds may be included in an
amendment to an existing grant.
For formula programs funded solely
from trust funds beginning in FY 2006,
grantees may not combine funds
appropriated since FY 2006 in the same
grant with FY 2005 and prior year
funds. Grant amendments cannot be
made to add FY 2006 and later year
funds to a grant that includes FY 2005
or prior funds. However, grantees are
able to amend new grants established
with FY 2006 or later year funds to add
funds made available after FY 2006. We
regret any inconvenience this
accounting change may cause as we
implement new statutory requirements
under SAFETEA–LU. We encourage
grantees to spend down and close out
old grants as quickly as possible to
minimize the inconvenience.
b. Grant Budgets—SCOPE and Activity
Line Item (ALI) Codes
FTA uses the SCOPE and Activity
Line Item (ALI) Codes in the grant
budgets to track program trends, to
report to Congress, and to respond to
requests from the Inspector General and
the Government Accountability Office
(GAO), as well as to manage grants. The
accuracy of the data is dependent on the
careful and correct use of codes. As
needed, we revise the SCOPE and ALI
table to include new codes for newly
eligible capital items, to better track
certain expenditures, and to
accommodate new or modified
programs. We encourage grantees to
review the table before selecting codes
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7072
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
from the drop-down menus in TEAM–
Web while creating a grant budget and
to consult with the regional office in the
correct use of codes.
c. Earmark and Discretionary Program
Tracking
FTA has implemented procedures in
TEAM–Web for matching grants to
earmarks or projects selected by FTA
under discretionary programs. Each
earmark or selected discretionary
project published in the Federal
Register is associated with a unique
identifier. Tables of earmarks and
selected discretionary projects have also
been established in TEAM–Web. When
applying for a grant using funding
designated by Congress or FTA for a
particular project, grantees are asked to
identify the amount of funding
associated with each specific earmark or
discretionary project used in the grant.
Further instructions are posted on the
TEAM–Web site and regional staff can
provide additional assistance.
F. Payments
Once a grant has been awarded and
executed, requests for payment can be
processed. To process payments FTA
uses ECHO–Web, an Internet accessible
system that provides grantees the
capability to submit payment requests
on-line, as well as receive user-IDs and
passwords via e-mail. New applicants
should contact the appropriate FTA
regional office to obtain and submit the
registration package necessary for set-up
under ECHO–Web.
G. Oversight
FTA conducts periodic oversight
reviews to assess grantee compliance
with Federal requirements. Each
urbanized area grantee is reviewed
every three years (a Triennial Review).
Triennial reviews have been modified to
look at the grantee’s involvement in the
coordinated planning for transportation
for the populations targeted by the JARC
and New Freedom programs and
participation in delivery of specialized
services under those programs in the
urbanized area. In addition, FY 2010
reviews will examine implementation of
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act, ARRA, grants. States are reviewed
periodically for their management of the
Section 5310, 5311, JARC, and New
Freedom programs. Other more detailed
reviews are scheduled based on an
annual grantee risk assessment, for
example, reviews in the areas of
Procurement, Financial Management,
Safety and Civil Rights.
H. Technical Assistance
FTA headquarters and regional staff
will be pleased to answer your
questions and provide any technical
assistance you may need to apply for
FTA program funds and manage the
grants you receive. This notice and the
program guidance circulars previously
identified in this document may be
accessed via the FTA Web site at
https://www.fta.dot.gov.
In addition, copies of the following
circulars and other useful information
are available on the FTA Web site and
may be obtained from FTA regional
offices; Circular 4220.1F, ‘‘Third Party
Contracting Guidance,’’ and Circular
5010.1D, ‘‘Grant Management
Guidelines.’’ Both circulars were
recently revised and can be found at
https://www.fta.dot.gov/laws/
leg_reg_circulars_guidance.html. The
FY 2010 Annual List of Certifications
and Assurances and Master Agreement
are also posted on the FTA Web site.
The DOT final rule on ‘‘Participation by
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in
Department of Transportation Financial
Assistance Programs,’’ which was
effective July 16, 2003, can be found at
https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/
waisidx_04/49cfr26_04.html/
Peter Rogoff,
Administrator.
Appendix A
FTA REGIONAL OFFICES
Richard H. Doyle Regional Administrator, Region 1–Boston, Kendall Square, 55
Broadway, Suite 920, Cambridge, MA 02142–1093, Tel. 617–494–2055.
States served: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Brigid Hynes-Cherin, Regional Administrator, Region 2–New York, One Bowling
Green, Room 429, New York, NY 10004–1415, Tel. 212–668–2170.
States served: New Jersey, New York .....................................................................
New York Metropolitan Office, Region 2–New York, One Bowling Green, Room
428 New York, NY 10004–1415, Tel. 212–668–2202
Letitia Thompson, Regional Administrator, Region 3–Philadelphia, 1760 Market
Street, Suite 500, Philadelphia, PA 19103–4124, Tel. 215–656–7100.
States served: Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and
District of Columbia.
Philadelphia Metropolitan Office, Region 3–Philadelphia, 1760 Market Street,
Suite 500, Philadelphia, PA 19103–4124, Tel. 215–656–7070
Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Office, 1990 K Street, NW., Room 510, Washington, DC 20006, Tel. 202–219–3562
Yvette Taylor, Regional Administrator, Region 4–Atlanta, 230 Peachtreet Street,
NW. Suite 800, Atlanta, GA 30303, Tel. 404–865–5600.
States served: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina,
Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virgin Islands.
Marisol Simon, Regional Administrator, Region 5–Chicago, 200 West Adams
Street, Suite 320, Chicago, IL 60606, Tel. 312–353–2789.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
States served: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin ............
Chicago Metropolitan Office, Region 5–Chicago, 200 West Adams Street, Suite
320, Chicago, IL 60606, Tel. 312–353–2789
Robert C. Patrick, Regional Administrator, Region 6–Ft. Worth, 819 Taylor Street,
Room 8A36, Ft. Worth, TX 76102, Tel. 817–978–0550.
States served: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas.
Mokhtee Ahmad Regional Administrator, Region 7–Kansas City, MO, 901 Locust
Street, Room 404, Kansas City, MO 64106, Tel. 816–329–3920.
States served: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.
Terry Rosapep, Regional Administrator, Region 8–Denver, 12300 West Dakota
Ave., Suite 310, Lakewood, CO 80228–2583, Tel. 720–963–3300.
States served: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.
Leslie T. Rogers Regional Administrator, Region 9–San Francisco, 201 Mission
Street, Room 1650, San Francisco, CA 94105–1926, Tel. 415–744–3133
States served: American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Nevada, and
the Northern Mariana Islands.
Los Angeles Metropolitan Office, Region 9–Los Angeles, 888 S. Figueroa Street,
Suite 1850, Los Angeles, CA 90017–1850, Tel. 213–202–3952
Rick Krochalis, Regional Administrator, Region 10–Seattle, Jackson Federal
Building, 915 Second Avenue, Suite 3142, Seattle, WA 98174–1002, Tel. 206–
220–7954
States served: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7073
EN16FE10.000
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.001
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7074
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7075
EN16FE10.002
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.003
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7076
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7077
EN16FE10.004
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.005
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7078
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7079
EN16FE10.006
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.007
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7080
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7081
EN16FE10.008
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.009
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7082
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7083
EN16FE10.010
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.011
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7084
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7085
EN16FE10.012
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.013
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7086
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7087
EN16FE10.014
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.015
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7088
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7089
EN16FE10.016
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.017
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7090
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7091
EN16FE10.018
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.019
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7092
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7093
EN16FE10.020
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.021
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7094
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7095
EN16FE10.022
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.023
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7096
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7097
EN16FE10.024
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.025
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7098
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7099
EN16FE10.026
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.027
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7100
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7101
EN16FE10.028
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.029
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7102
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7103
EN16FE10.030
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.031
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7104
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7105
EN16FE10.032
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.033
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7106
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7107
EN16FE10.034
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.035
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7108
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7109
EN16FE10.036
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.037
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7110
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7111
EN16FE10.038
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.039
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7112
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7113
EN16FE10.040
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.041
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7114
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7115
EN16FE10.042
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.043
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7116
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7117
EN16FE10.044
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.045
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7118
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7119
EN16FE10.046
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.047
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7120
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7121
EN16FE10.048
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.049
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7122
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7123
EN16FE10.050
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.051
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7124
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7125
EN16FE10.052
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.053
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7126
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7127
EN16FE10.054
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.055
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7128
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7129
EN16FE10.056
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.057
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7130
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7131
EN16FE10.058
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.059
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7132
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7133
EN16FE10.060
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.061
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7134
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7135
EN16FE10.062
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.063
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7136
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7137
EN16FE10.064
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.065
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7138
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7139
EN16FE10.066
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.067
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7140
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7141
EN16FE10.068
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.069
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7142
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7143
EN16FE10.070
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.071
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7144
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
7145
EN16FE10.072
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.073
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
7146
7147
[FR Doc. 2010–2996 Filed 2–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE C
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:46 Feb 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\16FEN2.SGM
16FEN2
EN16FE10.074
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 / Notices
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7048-7147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2996]
[[Page 7047]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Transportation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Transit Administration
FTA Fiscal Year 2010 Apportionments, Allocations, and Program
Information; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 75 , No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2010 /
Notices
[[Page 7048]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
FTA Fiscal Year 2010 Apportionments, Allocations, and Program
Information
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) annually publishes
one or more notices apportioning funds appropriated by law. In some
cases, if less than a full year of funds is available, FTA publishes
multiple partial apportionment notices. This notice is the first notice
announcing partial apportionment of Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 formula and
discretionary funds. It also provides program guidance and
requirements; and provides information on several program issues
important in the current fiscal year. The notice also includes tables
that show certain discretionary programs unobligated (carryover)
funding from previous years that will be available for obligation
during FY 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information about this
notice contact Henrika Buchanan-Smith, Director, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366-2053. Please contact the appropriate FTA
regional office for any specific requests for information or technical
assistance. The Appendix at the end of this notice includes contact
information for FTA regional offices. An FTA headquarters contact for
each major program area is included in the discussion of that program
in the text of the notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Overview
II. FY 2010 Available Funding for FTA Programs
A. Available Funding Based on Continuing Appropriations
Resolution 2010, and Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) and the
Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act 2010
B. Program Funds Set-aside for Oversight
III. FY 2010 FTA Key Program Initiatives and Changes
A. SAFETEA-LU Implementation
B. Planning Emphasis Areas
C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant Opportunities
D. Flexible Funding Procedures
E. Match for Biodiesel Vehicles and Hybrid Retrofits
IV. FTA Programs
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5305)
B. Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5305)
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307)
D. Clean Fuels Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5308)
E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Fixed Guideway
Modernization
F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Bus and Bus-
Related Facilities
G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--New Starts and
Small Starts
H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals With
Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5311)
J. Rural Transportation Assistance Program (49 U.S.C.
5311(b)(3))
K. Public Transportation on Indian Reservation Program (49
U.S.C. 5311(c))
L. National Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5314)
M. Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317)
O. Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks Program (49 U.S.C. 5320)
P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. 5339)
Q. Growing States and High Density States Formula (49 U.S.C.
5340)
R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 note)
S. Grants for Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Reduction
(TIGGER) Program
T. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Grants
V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY 2010 Grants Requirements
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority to Incur Project Costs
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
C. FTA FY 2010 Annual List of Certifications and Assurances
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes
E. Grant Application Procedures
F. Payments
G. Oversight
H. Technical Assistance
Tables
1. FTA FY 2010 Appropriations and Apportionments for Grant
Programs
2. FTA FY 2010 Metropolitan Planning Program and Statewide
Planning and Research Program Apportionments
3. FTA FY 2010 Section 5307 and Section 5340 Urbanized Area
Apportionments
3-A. 2000 Census Urbanized Areas 200,000 or More in Population
Eligible to Use Section 5307 Funds for Operating Assistance.
4. FTA FY 2010 Section 5307 Apportionment Formula
5. FTA FY 2010 Formula Programs Apportionments Data Unit Values
6. FTA FY 2010 Small Transit Intensive Cities Performance Data
and Apportionments
7. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5308 Clean Fuels
Allocations
8. FTA FY 2010 Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization
Apportionments
9. FTA FY 2010 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program
Apportionment Formula
10. FTA FY 2010 Section 5309 Buses and Bus Related Equipment and
Facilities Allocations
10-A. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5309 Buses and Bus
Related Equipment and Facilities Allocations
10-B. FTA FY 2010 Section 5309 Buses and Bus Related Equipment
and Facilities Extended and Reprogrammed Earmarks
11. FTA FY 2010 Section 5309 New Starts Allocations
12. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5309 New Starts
Allocations
13. FTA FY 2010 Special Needs For Elderly Individuals and
Individuals With Disabilities Apportionments
14. FTA FY 2010 Section 5311 and Section 5340 Nonurbanized Area
Formula Apportionments, and Rural Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP) Allocations
15. FTA Prior Unobligated Tribal Transit Discretionary
Allocations
16. FTA FY 2010 Section 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute
(JARC) Apportionments
17. FTA Prior Unobligated Discretionary JARC Allocations
18. FTA FY 2010 Section 5317 New Freedom Apportionments
19. FTA FY 2010 Section 5339 Alternatives Analysis Allocations
20. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5339 Alternatives
Analysis Allocations
Appendix
I. Overview
FTA's current authorization, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient, Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU),
expired September 30, 2009. Since that time, Congress has enacted short
term extensions allowing FTA to continue its current programs. The
Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2010, as amended, (Pub. L. 111-
68, Div. B), continues the authorization of the Federal transit
programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) through
February 28, 2010. It extends contract authority for the Formula and
Bus Grants programs at the same levels that were available under the
Omnibus Appropriations, 2009 (Pub. L. 111-8, Div. I) until February 28,
2010, i.e., approximately \5/12\th of the contract authority available
in fiscal year (FY) 2009. Additionally, Division A of the
Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act 2010 (Pub. L. 111-68), which was signed into law by
President Obama on December 16, 2009, appropriated funds for FTA
general-funded programs for FY 2010. This notice provides information
on funding amounts that are currently available for FTA assistance
programs.
[[Page 7049]]
This document apportions or allocates available FY 2010 funds that
were made available under Division A of the Transportation, Housing and
Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act 2010
hereinafter, (``Appropriations Act, 2010'') and the Continuing
Appropriations Resolution, 2010, as amended, hereinafter, (``CR,
2010'') among potential program recipients according to statutory
formulas in 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 and existing Full Funding Grant
Agreements. The notice includes FY 2010 formula and section 5309 bus
category funds that are currently available, which is approximately \5/
12\ or 41% of the amounts that were available under the Omnibus
Appropriations Act, 2009. The notice does not include any extension or
reprogramming of any discretionary funds that lapsed to the designated
project as of September 30, 2009. FTA will issue a supplemental notice
at a later date for any additional increments of formula and
discretionary funds that become available.
For each FTA program included in this notice, we have provided
relevant information on the FY 2010 funding currently available,
program requirements, period of availability, and other related program
information and highlights, as appropriate. A separate section of the
document provides information on program requirements and guidance that
are applicable to all FTA programs.
II. FY 2010 Funding for FTA Programs
A. Funding Based on the Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L.) and CR, 2010
The Appropriations Act, 2010 provide general funds and obligation
authority trust funds from the Mass Transit Account (MTA) of the
Highway trust fund that total $4.1 billion for FTA programs. The CR
2010 makes available \5/12\ths of the contract authority level provided
in FY 2009 for the Formula and Section 5309 Bus programs. Table 1 of
this document shows the funding that is currently available for the FTA
programs. All Formula Programs and the Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities Program are funded entirely from MTA of the Highway Trust
Fund in FY 2010. The Section 5309 New Starts Program, the Research
Program, Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority, Transit Investments
for Greenhouse Gas and Energy Reduction (TIGGER) Program and FTA
administrative expenses are funded by appropriations from the General
Fund of the Treasury.
This Federal Register notice includes tables of apportionments and
allocations for FTA formula programs based on the Appropriations Act,
2010 and the CR, 2010. Additionally, discretionary funding under the
New Starts, Bus and Bus facilities, Alternative Analysis and the
Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority Programs that were allocated
in the Appropriations Act, 2010 are also included.
B. Program Funds Set-Aside for Project Management Oversight
As background, Section 5327 of title 49 U.S.C., authorizes the
takedown of funds from FTA programs for project management oversight.
Section 5327 provides oversight takedowns at the following levels: 0.5
percent of Planning funds, 0.75 percent of Urbanized Area Formula
funds, 1 percent of Capital Investment funds, 0.5 percent of Special
Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities formula
funds, 0.5 percent of Non-urbanized Area Formula funds, and 0.5 percent
of the Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in the Parks Program funds (formerly
the Alternative Transportation in the Parks and Public Lands Program).
The funds are used to provide necessary oversight activities,
including oversight of the construction of any major capital project
under these statutory programs; to conduct State Safety Oversight, drug
and alcohol, civil rights, procurement systems, management, planning
certification and, financial reviews and audits, as well as evaluations
and analyses of grantee specific problems and issues; and to provide
technical assistance to correct deficiencies identified in compliance
reviews and audits.
III. FY 2010 FTA Program Initiatives and Changes
A. Binding Guidance or Policy Documents
Before any requirements placing binding obligations on grantees are
finalized, FTA will publish and make them available for public comment.
We encourage grantees to regularly check the FTA Web site at https://www.fta.dot.gov and the U.S. Government docket management Web site at
https://regulations.gov for new issuances and to comment to the docket
established for each document on relevant issues.
B. Planning Emphasis Areas--Planning for Sustainable Communities
FTA and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) periodically
identify Planning Emphasis Areas (PEAs) to promote priority themes for
consideration, as appropriate, in metropolitan and statewide
transportation planning processes. For FY 2010, ``planning for
sustainable communities'' has been identified as the emphasis area. To
support effective practice and capacity-building on this topic, FTA and
FHWA will prepare and distribute an inventory of current practice,
guidance, and training and offer targeted technical assistance.
Opportunities for peer exchange of ideas and experiences on innovative
practice on the topic will be provided throughout the year.
For further information on this emphasis area, contact Jeff Price,
FTA Office of Systems Planning, (202) 366-4280.
C. Livability
FTA fosters livable communities and sustainable development through
its various transit programs and activities. Public transportation
supports the development of communities, providing effective and
reliable transportation alternatives that increase access to jobs,
health and social services, entertainment, educational opportunities,
and other activities of daily life, while also improving mobility
within and among these communities. Through various initiatives and
legislative changes over the last fifteen years, FTA has allowed and
encouraged projects that help integrate transit into a community
through neighborhood improvements and enhancements to transit
facilities or services, or make improvements to areas adjacent to
public transit facilities that may facilitate mobility demands of
transit users or support other infrastructure investments that enhance
the use of transit for the community.
On June 16, 2009, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Secretary
Ray LaHood, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Secretary Shaun Donovan, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Administrator Lisa Jackson announced a new interagency partnership to
help improve access to affordable housing, more transportation options,
and lower transportation costs, while protecting the environment. The
three agencies are coordinating Federal transportation, environmental
protection, and housing investments at their respective agencies to
support sustainable communities for American families in rural,
suburban and urban areas.
During FY 2010, FTA will implement the Livability Bus and Urban
Circulator Programs, which will result in a minimum of $280 million in
funding for
[[Page 7050]]
projects that demonstrate livability principles by providing more
transportation choices; enhancing economic competitiveness; enhancing
existing communities; coordinating policies and leveraging investments;
and valuing communities and neighborhoods.
D. Flexible Funding Procedures
Flexible funding was one of the hallmarks of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) that was continued to the
present day. Flexible funding provisions enable State and local
governments, transit operators, and metropolitan planning organizations
to more effectively meet their unique needs, and facilitate a
multimodal approach to meeting transportation needs at both the
statewide and metropolitan levels. The statutory flexibility provisions
include:
1. Broad highway/transit spending eligibility within selected
categories of major highway and transit programs;
2. Allowance of the transfer of funds within the Federal-aid
highway program to other programs with broader highway/transit
eligibility; and
3. Allowance of the transfer of funds from FHWA to FTA, and vice
versa.
Obligation authority for flexible funds, high priority projects and
other transit projects in Title 23 U.S.C., is transferred to FTA when
States and local agencies determine that FTA will administer the public
transportation project. The liquidating cash, however, is transferred
between Federal accounts only as needed to ensure that adequate funds
are available for disbursement on a timely basis. In order to track the
cash flow more closely, FTA no longer combines funds transferred from
FHWA into a single grant with FTA funds in the program to which they
are transferred. FTA has established codes and procedures for grants
involving funds transferred from FHWA. Grantees can contact the
appropriate regional office for funding assistance.
E. Changes in Match for Biodiesel Vehicles and Hybrid Retrofits
Section 164 of the Appropriations Act 2010, provides that any grant
for a project that involves the acquisition or rehabilitation of a bus
to be used in public transportation shall be funded at 90 percent
Federal share for the net capital costs of a biodiesel bus or a
factory-installed or retrofitted hybrid electric propulsion system and
any equipment related to such a system. This increased Federal share is
a cross-cutting provision and is applicable across FTA programs for any
grants awarded during FY 2010 regardless of what fiscal year funding is
used. Grantees may apply for a 90 percent Federal share for the entire
cost of a biodiesel bus, but only for the cost of the propulsion system
and related equipment in the case of the hybrid electric systems, not
for 90 percent of the cost of the entire vehicle. In lieu of
calculating the costs of the hybrid electric propulsion system
separately, grantees may apply for 83 percent of the cost of the
vehicle.
IV. FTA Programs
This section of the notice provides the available FY 2010 funding
to date and/or other important program-related information for 19
separate FTA programs that are contained in this notice. Funding for
eleven programs is apportioned by statutory or administrative formula.
Funding for the other eight programs will be allocated on a
discretionary or competitive basis.
Funding and/or other important information for each of the 19
programs is presented immediately below. This includes program
apportionments or allocations, certain program requirements, length of
time FY 2010 funding is available for obligation and other significant
program information pertaining to FY 2010.
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5305(d))
Section 5305(d) authorizes Federal funding to support a
cooperative, continuous, and comprehensive planning program for
transportation investment decision-making at the metropolitan area
level. The specific requirements of metropolitan transportation
planning are set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5303 and further explained in 23
CFR part 450, as incorporated by reference in 49 CFR part 613,
Statewide Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation
Planning; Final Rule. State Departments of Transportation are direct
recipients of funds allocated by FTA, which are then suballocated to
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) by formula, for planning
activities that support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area,
especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and
efficiency; increasing the safety and security of the transportation
system for motorized and non-motorized users; increasing the
accessibility and mobility options available to people and for freight;
protecting and enhancing the environment, promoting energy
conservation, and improving quality of life; enhancing the integration
and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between
modes, for people and freight; promoting efficient transportation
system management and operation; and emphasizing the preservation of
the existing transportation system. This funding must support work
elements and activities resulting in balanced and comprehensive
intermodal transportation planning for the movement of people and goods
in the metropolitan area. Comprehensive transportation planning is not
limited to transit planning or surface transportation planning, but
also encompasses the relationships among land use and all
transportation modes, without regard to the programmatic source of
Federal assistance. Eligible work elements or activities include, but
are not limited to studies relating to management, mobility management,
planning, operations, capital requirements, and economic feasibility;
evaluation of previously funded projects; peer reviews and exchanges of
technical data, information, assistance, and related activities in
support of planning and environmental analysis among MPOs and other
transportation planners; work elements and related activities
preliminary to and in preparation for constructing, acquiring, or
improving the operation of facilities and equipment; development of
coordinated public transit human services transportation plans. An
exhaustive list of eligible work activities is provided in FTA Circular
8100.1C, Program Guidance for Metropolitan Planning and State Planning
and Research Program Grants, dated September 1, 2008. For more about
the Metropolitan Planning Program and the FTA Circular 8100.1C, contact
James Garland, Office of Planning and Environment at (202) 366-0526.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $38,841,000 to the Metropolitan Planning Program
(49 U.S.C. 5305(d) to support metropolitan transportation planning
activities set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5303. The total amount apportioned
for the Metropolitan Planning Program to States for MPOs' use in
urbanized areas (UZAs) is $38,646,795, as shown in the table below,
after the deduction for oversight.
Metropolitan Planning Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation..................................... $38,841,000
Oversight Deduction..................................... -$194,205
---------------
Total Apportioned..................................... $38,646,795
------------------------------------------------------------------------
States' apportionments for this program are displayed in Table 2
[[Page 7051]]
2. Basis for Formula Apportionments.
As specified in law, 82.72 percent of the amounts authorized for
Section 5305 are allocated to the Metropolitan Planning program. FTA
allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to the States according to a
statutory formula. Eighty percent of the funds are distributed to the
States as a basic allocation based on each State's UZA population,
based on the most recent decennial Census. The remaining 20 percent is
provided to the States as a supplemental allocation based on an FTA
administrative formula to address planning needs in the larger, more
complex UZAs. The amount published for each State is a combined total
of both the basic and supplemental allocation.
3. Program Requirements
The State allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to MPOs in UZAs or
portions thereof to provide funds for projects included in an annual
work program (the Unified Planning Work Program, or UPWP) that includes
both highway and transit planning projects. Each State has either
reaffirmed or developed, in consultation with their MPOs, an allocation
formula, based on the 2000 Census. The State allocation formula may be
changed annually, but any change requires approval by the FTA regional
office before grant approval. Program guidance for the Metropolitan
Planning Program is found in FTA Circular 8100.1C, Program Guidance for
Metropolitan Planning and State Planning and Research Program Grants,
dated September 1, 2008. For more about the Metropolitan Planning
Program and the FTA Circular 8100.1C, contact James Garland of the
Office of Planning and Environment at (202) 366-0526.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the Metropolitan Planning program to
each State remain available for obligation by FTA to recipients for
four fiscal years--which includes the year of apportionment plus three
additional years. Any apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the
close of business on September 30, 2013, will revert to FTA for
reapportionment under the Metropolitan Planning Program.
5. Consolidated Planning Grants
FTA and FHWA planning funds under both the Metropolitan Planning
and State Planning and Research Programs can be consolidated into a
single consolidated planning grant (CPG), awarded by either FTA or
FHWA. The CPG eliminates the need to monitor individual fund sources,
if several have been used, and ensures that the oldest funds will
always be used first. Unlike ``flex funds'' for capital programs,
planning funds from FHWA may be combined with FTA planning funds in a
single grant. Alternatively, FTA planning funds may be transferred to
FHWA to be administered as combined grants.
Under the CPG, States can report metropolitan planning program
expenditures (to comply with the Single Audit Act) for both FTA and
FHWA under the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance number for
FTA's Metropolitan Planning Program (20.505). Additionally, for States
with an FHWA Metropolitan Planning (PL) fund-matching ratio greater
than 80 percent, the State can waive the 20 percent local share
requirement, with FTA's concurrence, to allow FTA funds used for
metropolitan planning in a CPG to be granted at the higher FHWA rate.
For some States, this Federal match rate can exceed 90 percent.
States interested in transferring planning funds between FTA and
FHWA should contact the FTA Regional Office or FHWA Division Office for
more detailed procedures. Current guidelines are included in Federal
Highway Administration Memorandum dated July 12, 2007, ``Information:
Final Transfers to Other Agencies that Administer Title 23 Programs.''
For further information on CPGs, contact Nancy Grubb, Office of
Budget and Policy, FTA, at (202) 366-1635.
B. State Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5305(e))
This program provides financial assistance to States for Statewide
transportation planning and other technical assistance activities,
including supplementing the technical assistance program provided
through the Metropolitan Planning program. The specific requirements of
Statewide transportation planning are set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5304 and
further explained in 23 CFR part 450 as referenced in 49 CFR part 613,
Statewide Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation
Planning; Final Rule. This funding must support work elements and
activities resulting in balanced and comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning is not limited to transit
planning or surface transportation planning, but also encompasses the
relationships among land use and all transportation modes, without
regard to the programmatic source of Federal assistance. For more
information, contact James Garland of the Office of Planning and
Environment at (202) 366-0526.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $8,114,000 to the State Planning and Research
Program (49 U.S.C. 5305). The total amount apportioned for the State
Planning and Research Program (SPRP) is $8,073,430 as shown in the
table below, after the deduction for oversight (authorized by 49 U.S.C.
5327).
State Planning and Research Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation..................................... $8,114,000
Oversight Deduction..................................... -$40,570
---------------
Total Apportioned..................................... $8,073,430
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State apportionments for this program are displayed in Table 2.
2. Basis for Apportionment Formula
As specified in law, 17.28 percent of the amounts authorized for
Section 5305 are allocated to the State Planning and Research program.
FTA apportions funds to States by a statutory formula that is based on
the most recent decennial Census, and the State's UZA population as
compared to the UZA population of all States.
3. Requirements
Funds are provided to States for Statewide transportation planning
programs. These funds may be used for a variety of purposes such as
planning, technical studies and assistance, demonstrations, and
management training. In addition, a State may authorize a portion of
these funds to be used to supplement Metropolitan Planning funds
allocated by the State to its UZAs, as the State deems appropriate.
Program guidance for the State Planning and Research program is found
in FTA Circular 8100.1C. This funding must support work elements and
activities resulting in balanced and comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning is not limited to transit
planning or surface transportation planning, but also encompasses the
relationships among land use and all transportation modes, without
regard to the programmatic source of Federal assistance. Eligible work
elements or activities include, but are not limited to studies relating
to management, planning, operations, capital requirements, and economic
feasibility; evaluation of previously
[[Page 7052]]
funded projects; peer reviews and exchanges of technical data,
information, assistance, and related activities in support of planning
and environmental analysis; work elements and related activities
preliminary to and in preparation for constructing, acquiring, or
improving the operation of facilities and equipment. An exhaustive list
of eligible work activities is provided in FTA Circular 8100.1C,
Program Guidance for Metropolitan Planning and State Planning and
Research Program Grants, dated September 1, 2008. For more information,
contact James Garland of the Office of Planning and Environment at
(202) 366-0526.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the State Planning and Research program
to each State remain available for obligation for four fiscal years--
which include the year of apportionment plus three additional fiscal
years. Any apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2013, will revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the State Planning and Research Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
See Section A.5 of this notice for information about Planning
Emphasis Areas and Consolidated Planning Grants.
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307)
Section 5307 authorizes Federal capital assistance, and in some
cases, operating assistance for public transportation in UZAs. A UZA is
an area with a population of 50,000 or more that has been defined and
designated as such in the 2000 Census by the U.S. Census Bureau. The
Urbanized Area Formula Program funds may also be used to support
planning activities, and may supplement planning projects funded under
the Metropolitan Planning program. Urbanized Areas Formula Program
funds used for planning must be shown in the Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP) for MPO(s) with responsibility for that area. Funding is
apportioned directly to each UZA with a population of 200,000 or more,
and to the State Governors for UZAs with populations between 50,000 and
200,000. Eligible applicants are limited to entities designated as
recipients in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5307(a)(2) and other public
entities with the consent of the Designated Recipient. Generally,
operating assistance is not an eligible expense for UZAs with
populations of 200,000 or more. However, there are several exceptions
to this restriction. The exceptions are described in section 3(d)(5)
below.
For more information about the Urbanized Area Formula Program
contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-1660.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $1,721,140,000 to the Urbanized Area Formula
Program (49 U.S.C. 5307). The total amount apportioned for the
Urbanized Area Formula Program is $1,870,317,082 as shown in the table
below, after the 0.75 percent deduction for oversight (authorized by 49
U.S.C. 5327) and including funds apportioned to UZAs from the
appropriation for Section 5340 for Growing States and High Density
States.
Urbanized Area Formula Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation................................... \a\
$1,721,140,000
Oversight Deduction................................... -$12,908,550
Section 5340 Funds Added.............................. $162,085,632
-----------------
Total Apportioned................................... $1,870,317,082
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ One percent set-aside for Small Transit Intensive Cities Formula.
Table 3 displays the amounts apportioned under the Urbanized Area
Formula Program.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
FTA apportions Urbanized Area Formula Program funds based on
legislative formulas. Different formulas apply to UZAs with populations
of 200,000 or more and to UZAs with populations less than 200,000. For
UZAs with 50,000 to 199,999 in population, the formula is based solely
on population and population density. For UZAs with populations of
200,000 and more, the formula is based on a combination of bus revenue
vehicle miles, bus passenger miles, fixed guideway revenue vehicle
miles, and fixed guideway route miles, as well as population and
population density. Table 4 includes detailed information about the
formulas.
To calculate a UZA's FY 2010 apportionment, FTA used population and
population density statistics from the 2000 Census and (when
applicable) validated mileage and transit service data from transit
providers' 2008 National Transit Database (NTD) Report Year. Consistent
with 49 U.S.C. 5336(b), FTA used 60 percent of the directional route
miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad passenger operations system
to calculate the apportionment for the Anchorage, Alaska UZA.
FTA has calculated dollar unit values for the formula factors used
in the Urbanized Area Formula Program apportionment calculations. These
values represent the amount of money each unit of a factor is worth in
this year's apportionment. The unit values change each year, based on
all of the data used to calculate the apportionments. The dollar unit
values for FY 2010 are displayed in Table 5. To replicate the basic
formula component of a UZA's apportionment, multiply the dollar unit
value by the appropriate formula factor (i.e., the population,
population x population density), and when applicable, data from the
NTD (i.e., route miles, vehicle revenue miles, passenger miles, and
operating cost).
In FY 2010, one percent of funds appropriated for Section 5307, or
$17,211,000 based on CR 2010 is set aside for Small Transit Intensive
Cities (STIC). FTA apportions these funds to UZAs under 200,000 in
population that operate at a level of service equal to or above the
industry average level of service for all UZAs with a population of at
least 200,000, but not more than 999,999, in one or more of six
performance categories: passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue
mile, passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue hour, vehicle
revenue miles per capita, vehicle revenue hours per capita, passenger
miles traveled per capita, and passengers per capita.
The data for these categories for the purpose of FY 2010
apportionments comes from the NTD reports for the 2008 reporting year.
This data is used to determine a UZA's eligibility under the STIC
formula, and is also used in the STIC apportionment calculations.
Because these performance data change with each year's NTD reports, the
UZAs eligible for STIC funds and the amount each receives may vary each
year. In FY 2010, FTA apportioned $56,826 for each performance factor/
category for which the urbanized area exceeded the national average for
UZAs with a population of at least 200,000 but not more than 999,999.
In addition to the funds apportioned to UZAs, according to the
Section 5307 formula factors contained in 49 U.S.C. 5336, FTA also
apportions funds to urbanized areas under Section 5340 Growing States
and High Density States formula factors. In FY 2010, FTA apportions
$65,900,632 to UZAs in growing States and $96,185,000 to UZAs in High
Density States. Half of the funds appropriated for Section 5340 are
available to Growing States and half to High Density States. FTA
apportions
[[Page 7053]]
Growing States funds by a formula based on State population forecasts
for 15 years beyond the most recent Census. FTA distributes the amounts
apportioned for each State between UZAs and nonurbanized areas based on
the ratio of urbanized/nonurbanized population within each State in the
2000 census, and to UZAs proportionately based on UZA population in the
2000 census (because population estimates are not available at the UZA
level). FTA apportions the High Density States funds to States with
population densities in excess of 370 persons per square mile. These
funds are apportioned only to UZAs within those States. FTA pro-rates
each UZA's share of the High Density funds based on the population of
the UZAs in the State in the 2000 census.
FTA cannot provide unit values for the Growing States or High
Density formulas because the allocations to individual States and
urbanized areas are based on their relative population data, rather
than on a national per capita basis.
Based on language in the conference report accompanying SAFETEA-LU,
FTA is to show a single apportionment amount for Section 5307, STIC and
Section 5340. FTA shows a single Section 5307 apportionment amount for
each UZA in Table 3, the Urbanized Area Formula apportionments. The
amount includes funds apportioned based on the Section 5307 formula
factors, any STIC funds, and any Growing States and High Density States
funding allocated to the area. FTA uses separate formulas to calculate
and generate the respective apportionment amounts for the Section 5307,
STIC and Section 5340. For technical assistance purposes, the UZAs that
received STIC funds are listed in Table 6. FTA will make available
breakouts of the funding allocated to each UZA under these formulas,
upon request to the regional office.
3. Program Requirements
Program guidance for the Urbanized Area Formula Program is
currently found in FTA Circular 9030.1C, Urbanized Area Formula
Program: Grant Application Instructions, dated October 1, 1998, and
supplemented by additional information or changes provided in this
document. FTA is in the process of updating the circular. The public
comment period on the proposed circular closed on November 30, 2009.
FTA anticipates publishing the final circular by March 31, 2010.
Several important program requirements are highlighted below.
a. Urbanized Area Formula Apportionments to Governors
For small UZAs, those with a population of less than 200,000, FTA
apportions funds to the Governor of each State for distribution. A
single total Governor's apportionment amount for the Urbanized Area
Formula, STIC, and Growing States and High Density States is shown in
the Urbanized Area Formula Apportionment Table 3. The table also shows
the apportionment amount attributable by formula to each small UZA
within the State for information purposes only unless the small UZA is
located within the planning boundaries of a Transportation Management
Area (TMA). The Governor is not bound by the small UZA amounts
published in this notice and shall determine the sub-allocation of
funds among the small UZAs. The Governor's sub-allocation should be
sent to the appropriate FTA Regional Office before grants being
awarded. In the case of a small UZA that is located within the planning
boundaries of TMA, the Governor must allocate to that small UZA, as
discussed in subsection f below.
b. Transit Enhancements
Section 5307(d)(1)(K) requires that one percent of Section 5307
funds apportioned to UZAs with populations of 200,000 or more be spent
on eligible transit enhancement activities or projects. This
requirement is now treated as a certification, rather than as a set-
aside as was the case under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA-21). Designated recipients in UZAs with populations of
200,000 or more certify they are spending not less than one percent of
Section 5307 funds for transit enhancements. In addition, Designated
Recipients must submit an annual report on how they spent the money
with the Federal fiscal year's final quarterly progress report in TEAM-
Web. The report should include the following elements: (1) Grantee
name; (2) UZA name and number; (3) FTA project number; (4) transit
enhancement category; (5) brief description of enhancement and progress
towards project implementation; (6) activity line item code from the
approved budget; and (7) amount awarded by FTA for the enhancement. The
list of transit enhancement categories and activity line item (ALI)
codes may be found in the table of Scope and ALI codes on TEAM-Web,
which can be accessed at https://FTATEAMWeb.fta.dot.gov.
The term ``transit enhancement'' includes projects or project
elements that are designed to enhance public transportation service or
use and are physically or functionally related to transit facilities.
Eligible enhancements include the following: (1) Historic preservation,
rehabilitation, and operation of historic mass transportation
buildings, structures, and facilities (including historic bus and
railroad facilities); (2) bus shelters; (3) landscaping and other
scenic beautification, including tables, benches, trash receptacles,
and street lights; (4) public art; (5) pedestrian access and walkways;
(6) bicycle access, including bicycle storage facilities and installing
equipment for transporting bicycles on mass transportation vehicles;
(7) transit connections to parks within the recipient's transit service
area; (8) signage; and (9) enhanced access for persons with
disabilities to mass transportation.
It is the responsibility of the MPO to determine how the one-
percent for transit enhancements will be allotted to transit projects.
The one percent minimum requirement does not preclude more than one
percent from being expended in a UZA for transit enhancements. However,
activities that are only eligible as enhancements--in particular,
operating costs for historic facilities--may be assisted only within
the one-percent funding level.
c. Transit Security Projects
Consistent with section 5307(d)(1)(J), each recipient of Urbanized
Area Formula funds must certify that of the amount received each fiscal
year, it will expend at least one percent on ``public transportation
security projects'' or must certify that it has decided the expenditure
is not necessary. For applicants not eligible to receive Section 5307
funds for operating assistance, only capital security projects may be
funded with the one percent. SAFETEA-LU, however, expanded the
definition of eligible ``capital'' projects to include specific crime
prevention and security activities, including: (1) Projects to refine
and develop security and emergency response plans; (2) projects aimed
at detecting chemical and biological agents in public transportation;
(3) the conduct of emergency response drills with public transportation
agencies and local first response agencies; and (4) security training
for public transportation employees, but excluding all expenses related
to operations, other than such expenses incurred in conducting
emergency drills and training. Activity Line Item (ALI) codes have been
established for these four new capital activities and will be used to
track the
[[Page 7054]]
use of this provision. The one percent may also include security
expenditures included within other capital activities, and, where the
recipient is eligible, operating assistance.
FTA is often called upon to report to Congress and others on how
grantees are expending Federal funds for security enhancements. To
facilitate tracking of grantees' security expenditures, which are not
always evident when included within larger capital or operating
activity line items in the grant budget, we have established a non-
additive (``non-add'') scope code for security expenditures--Scope 991.
The non-add scope is to be used to aggregate activities included in
other scopes, and it does not increase the budget total. Section 5307
grantees should include this non-add scope in the project budget for
each new Section 5307 grant application or amendment. Under this non-
add scope, the applicant should repeat the full amount of any of the
line items in the budget that are exclusively for security and include
the portion of any other line item in the project budget that is
attributable to security, using under the non-add scope the same line
item used in the project budget. The grantee can modify the ALI
description or use the extended text feature, if necessary, to describe
the security expenditures.
The grantee must provide information regarding its use of the one
percent for security as part of each Section 5307 grant application,
using a special screen in TEAM-Web. If the grantee has certified that
it is not necessary to expend one percent for security, the Section
5307 grant application must include information to support that
certification. FTA will not process an application for a Section 5307
grant until the security information is complete.
d. FY 2010 Operating Assistance
UZAs under 200,000 in population may use Section 5307 funds for
operating assistance. In addition, Section 5307, as amended, allows
some UZAs with a population of 200,000 or more to use Urbanized Area
Formula funds for operating assistance under certain conditions. CR,
2010 extends that eligibility until February 28, 2010. The specific
provisions allowing the limited use of operating assistance in large
UZAs follow:
(1) Section 5307(b)(1)(E) provides for grants for the operating
costs of equipment and facilities for use in public transportation in
the Evansville, IN-KY urbanized area, for a portion or portions of the
UZA if ``the portion'' of the UZA includes only one State, the
population of ``the portion'' is less than 30,000, and the grants will
be not used to provide public transportation outside of ``the portion''
of the UZA.
(2) Section 5307(b)(1)(F) provides operating costs of equipment and
facilities for use in public transportation for local governmental
authorities in areas which adopted transit operating and financing
plans that became a part of the Houston, Texas, UZA as a result of the
2000 decennial census of population, but lie outside the service area
of the principal public transportation agency that serves the Houston
UZA.
(3) Section 5336(a)(2) prescribes the formula to be used to
apportion Section 5307 funds to UZAs with population of 200,000 or
more. SAFETEA-LU amended 5336(a)(2) to add language that stated, ``* *
* except that the amount apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized area
under subsection (b) shall be available to the Alaska Railroad for any
costs related to its passenger operations.'' This language has the
effect of directing that funds apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized
area, under the fixed guideway tiers of the Section 5307 apportionment
formula, be made available to the Alaska Railroad, and that these funds
may be used for any capital or operating costs related to its passenger
operations.
(4) Section 3027(c)(3) of TEA-21, as amended (49 U.S.C. 5307 note),
provides an exception to the restriction on the use of operating
assistance in a UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, by allowing
transit providers/grantees that provide service exclusively to elderly
persons and persons with disabilities and that operate 20 or fewer
vehicles to use Section 5307 funds apportioned to the UZA for operating
assistance. The total amount of funding made available for this purpose
under Section 3027(c)(3) is $1.4 million. Transit providers/grantees
eligible under this provision have already been identified and
notified.
(5) Consistent with the SAFETEA-LU Technical Corrections Act, 2008,
in FY 2009, section 5307(b)(2) allowed (1) UZAs that grew in population
from under 200,000 to over 200,000 or that were under 200,000 but
merged into another urbanized area and the population is over 200,000,
as a result of the 2000 Census to use Section 5307 funds for operating
assistance in an amount up to 50 percent of the grandfathered amount
for FY 2002 funds; (2) Areas that were nonurbanized under the 1990
Census and became urbanized, as a result of the 2000 Census, to use no
more than 50 percent of the amount apportioned to the area for FY 2003
for operating assistance; and (3) nonurbanized areas under the 1990
Census that merged into urbanized areas over 200,000, as a result of
the 2000 Census, to use 50 percent of the amount the area received in
FY 2002 Section 5311 funding for operating assistance. CR 2010
continued these special rules for the period October 1, 2009 through
February 28, 2010.
e. Sources of Local Match
Consistent with to Section 5307(e), the Federal share of an
urbanized area formula grant is 80 percent of net project cost for a
capital project and 50 percent of net project cost for operating
assistance unless the recipient indicates a greater local share. The
remainder of the net project cost (i.e., 20 percent and 50 percent,
respectively) shall be provided from the following sources:
1. From non-Government sources other than revenues from providing
public transportation services;
2. From revenues derived from the sale of advertising and
concessions;
3. From an undistributed cash surplus, a replacement or
depreciation cash fund or reserve, or new capital;
4. From amounts received under a service agreement with a State or
local social service agency or private social service organization; and
5. Proceeds from the issuance of revenue bonds.
6. Funds from Section 403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be used to match Urbanized Area
Formula funds.
f. Designated Transportation Management Areas (TMA)
Guidance for setting the boundaries of TMAs is in the joint
transportation planning regulations codified at 23 CFR part 450 as
referenced in 49 CFR part 613. In some cases, the TMA planning
boundaries established by the MPO for the designated TMA includes one
or more small UZAs. In addition, one small UZA (Santa Barbara, CA) has
been designated as a TMA. In either of these situations, the Governor
cannot allocate ``Governor's Apportionment'' funds attributed to the
small UZAs to other areas; that is, the Governor only has discretion to
allocate Governor's Apportionment funds attributable to areas that are
outside of designated TMA planning boundaries.
The list of small UZAs included within the planning boundaries of
designated TMAs is provided in the table below.
[[Page 7055]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small urbanized area included
Designated TMA in TMA planning boundary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Albany, NY............................. Saratoga Springs, NY.
Houston, TX............................ Galveston, TX; Lake Jackson-
Angleton, TX; Texas City, TX;
The Woodlands, TX.
Jacksonville, FL....................... St. Augustine, FL.
Orlando, FL............................ Kissimmee, FL.
Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL................. Titusville, FL.
Philadelphia, PA-NJ-DE-MD.............. Pottstown, PA.
Pittsburg, PA.......................... Monessen, PA; Weirton, WV-
Steubenville, OH-PA (PA
portion); Uniontown-
Connellsville, PA.
Seattle, WA............................ Bremerton, WA.
Washington, DC-VA-MD................... Frederick, MD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The MPO must notify the Associate Administrator for Program
Management, Federal Transit Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE,
Washington, DC 20590, in writing, no later than July 1 of each year of
the identity of any small UZA within the planning boundaries of a TMA.
g. Urbanized Area Formula Funds Used for Highway Purposes
Funds apportioned to a TMA are eligible for transfer to FHWA for
highway projects, if the Designated Recipient has allocated a portion
of the area's Section 5307 funding for such use. However, before funds
can be transferred, the following conditions must be met: (1) approval
by the MPO in writing, after appropriate notice and opportunity for
comment and appeal are provided to affected transit providers; (2) a
determination of the Secretary that funds are not needed for
investments required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(ADA); and (3) the MPO determines that local transit needs are being
addressed.
The MPO should notify the appropriate FTA Regional Administrator of
its intent to use FTA funds for highway purposes, as prescribed in
section V.D below. Urbanized Area Formula funds that are designated by
the MPO for highway projects and meet the conditions cited in the
previous paragraph will be transferred to and administered by FHWA.
4. Period of Availability
The Urbanized Area Formula Program funds apportioned in this notice
are available for obligation during the year of appropriation plus
three additional years. Accordingly, these funds must be obligated in
grants by September 30, 2013. Any apportioned funds that remain
unobligated at the close of business on September 30, 2013, will revert
to FTA for reapportionment under the Urbanized Area Formula Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
In each UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, the Governor, in
consultation with responsible local officials and publicly owned
operators of public transportation, has designated one or more entities
to be the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 funds apportioned to
the UZA. The same entity(s) may or may not be the Designated Recipient
for the Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom program
funds apportioned to the UZA. In UZAs under 200,000 in population, the
State is the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 as well as JARC and
New Freedom programs. The Designated Recipient for Section 5307 may
authorize other entities to apply directly to FTA for Section 5307
grants pursuant to a supplemental agreement. While the requirement that
projects selected for funding be included in a locally developed
coordinated public transit/human service transportation plan is not
included in Section 5307 as it is in Sections 5310, 5316 (JARC) and
5317 (New Freedom), FTA expects that in their role as public transit
providers, recipients of Section 5307 funds will be participants in the
local planning process for these programs.
D. Clean Fuels Grant Program (49.U.S.C. 5308)
The Clean Fuels Grant program is a discretionary grant program that
supports the use of alternative fuels in air quality maintenance or
nonattainment areas for ozone or carbon monoxide through capital grants
to urbanized areas for clean fuel vehicles and facilities. For more
information about this program contact Juan Morrison, Office of Program
Management, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $21,306,000 to the Clean Fuels Grant program (49
U.S.C. 5308). FTA will publish allocations at a later date.
Clean Fuel Grant Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Apportioned....................................... $21,306,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Requirements
Clean Fuels Grant program funds may be made available to any
grantee in a UZA that is designated as maintenance or nonattainment
area for ozone or carbon monoxide as defined in the Clean Air Act.
Eligible recipients include section 5307 Designated Recipients as well
as recipients in small UZAs. The State in which a small UZA is located
will act as the recipient of funds. Eligible projects include the
purchase or lease of clean fuel buses, the construction or lease of
clean fuel or electrical recharging facilities and related equipment
for such buses, and construction or improvement of public
transportation facilities to accommodate clean fuel buses.
3. Period of Availability
Funds designated for specific Clean Fuels Grant program projects
are available for obligation for three fiscal years, which includes the
year of availability plus two additional fiscal years. FY 2010 Clean
Fuels funds not obligated in an FTA grant for eligible purposes by
September 30, 2012, may be made available for other section 5308
projects during the next fiscal year.
4. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
Table 20 lists prior year carryover of $56,812,150 for Clean Fuels
Grant program projects allocated project funding in FY 2008 and FY
2009. This amount includes $15,668,667 for FY 2008 and $41,143,483 for
FY 2009. The carryover amount for FY 2009 includes $29,868,000 in
unallocated funds.
E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Fixed Guideway
Modernization
This program provides capital assistance for the maintenance,
recapitalization, and modernization of existing fixed guideway systems.
Funds
[[Page 7056]]
are apportioned by a statutory formula to UZAs with fixed guideway
systems that have been in operation for at least seven years. A ``fixed
guideway'' refers to any transit service that uses exclusive or
controlled rights-of-way or rails, entirely or in part. The term
includes heavy rail, commuter rail, light rail, monorail, trolleybus,
aerial tramway, inclined plane, cable car, automated guideway transit,
ferryboats, that portion of motor bus service operated on exclusive or
controlled rights-of-way, and high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes.
Eligible applicants are the public transit authorities in those
urbanized areas to which the funds are apportioned. For more
information about Fixed Guideway Modernization contact Kimberly Sledge,
Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $689,431,000 to the Fixed Guideway Modernization
Program. The total amount apportioned for the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program is $682,536,690, after the deduction for
oversight, as shown in the table below.
Fixed Guideway Modernization Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation..................................... $689,431,000
Oversight Deduction..................................... -$6,894,310
---------------
Total Apportioned..................................... $682,536,690
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FY 2010 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program apportionments to
eligible areas are displayed in Table 8.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
The formula for allocating the Fixed Guideway Modernization funds
contains seven tiers. The apportionment of funding under the first four
tiers is based on amounts specified in law and NTD data used to
apportion funds in FY 1997. Funding under the last three tiers is
apportioned based on the latest available data on route miles and
revenue vehicle miles on segments at least seven years old, as reported
to the NTD. Section 5337(f) of title 49, U.S.C. provides for the
inclusion of Morgantown, West Virginia (population 55,997) as an
eligible UZA for purposes of apportioning fixed guideway modernization
funds. Also, consistent to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b), FTA uses 60 percent of
the directional route miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad
passenger operations system to calculate the apportionment for the
Anchorage, Alaska UZA under the Section 5309 Fixed Guideway
Modernization formula.
FY 2010 Formula apportionments are based on data grantees provided
to the NTD for the 2008 reporting year. Table 9 provides additional
information and details on the formula. Dollar unit values for the
formula factors used in the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program are
displayed in Table 5. To replicate an area's apportionment, multiply
the dollar unit value by the appropriate formula factor, i.e., route
miles and revenue vehicle miles.
3. Program Requirements
Fixed Guideway Modernization funds must be used for capital
projects to maintain, modernize, or improve fixed guideway systems.
Eligible UZAs (those with a population of 200,000 or more) with fixed
guideway systems that are at least seven years old are entitled to
receive Fixed Guideway Modernization funds. A threshold level of more
than one mile of fixed guideway is required in order to receive Fixed
Guideway Modernization funds. Therefore, UZAs reporting one mile or
less of fixed guideway mileage under the NTD are not included. However,
funds apportioned to an urbanized area may be used on any fixed
guideway segment in the UZA. Program guidance for Fixed Guideway
Modernization is presently found in FTA Circular C9300.1B, Capital
Facilities and Formula Grant Programs, dated November 1, 2008.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned in this notice under the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program remain available to recipients to be obligated in
a grant during the year of appropriation plus three additional years.
FY 2010 Fixed Guideway Modernization funds that remain unobligated at
the close of business on September 30, 2013, will revert to FTA for
reapportionment under the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program.
F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities
This program provides capital assistance for new and replacement
buses, and related equipment and facilities. Funds are allocated on a
discretionary basis. Eligible purposes are acquisition of buses for
fleet and service expansion, bus maintenance and administrative
facilities, transfer facilities, bus malls, transportation centers,
intermodal terminals, park-and-ride stations, acquisition of
replacement vehicles, bus rebuilds, bus preventive maintenance,
passenger amenities such as passenger shelters and bus stop signs,
accessory and miscellaneous equipment such as mobile radio units,
supervisory vehicles, fare boxes, computers, and shop and garage
equipment. Eligible applicants are State and local governmental
authorities. Eligible subrecipients include other public agencies,
private companies engaged in public transportation and private non-
profit organizations. For more information about Bus and Bus Related
Facilities contact Juan Morrison, Office of Transit Programs, at (202)
366-2053.
1. FY 2010 Funding Availability
CR 2010 provides $365,711,000 for the Bus and Bus Related
Facilities program. After deduction of one percent for program
management oversight, $362,053,890 remains available.
Bus and Bus Related Facilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation..................................... $365,711,000
Oversight Deduction............................