Rules of Practice in Proceedings Relative to Mail Disputes, 6570 [2010-2844]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
6570
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
has been named in the information
request provided to the institution by
FinCEN with any questions relating to
the scope or terms of the request. Except
as otherwise provided in the
information request, a financial
institution shall only be required to
search its records for:
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) * * *
(B)(1) A financial institution shall not
disclose to any person, other than
FinCEN or the requesting Treasury
component, the law enforcement agency
on whose behalf FinCEN is requesting
information, or U.S. law enforcement
´
attache in the case of a request by a
foreign law enforcement agency, which
has been named in the information
request, the fact that FinCEN has
requested or has obtained information
under this section, except to the extent
necessary to comply with such an
information request.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph
(b)(3)(iv)(B)(1) of this section, a financial
institution authorized to share
information under § 103.110 may share
information concerning an individual,
entity, or organization named in a
request from FinCEN in accordance
with the requirements of such section.
However, such sharing shall not
disclose the fact that FinCEN has
requested information concerning such
individual, entity, or organization.
(C) Each financial institution shall
maintain adequate procedures to protect
the security and confidentiality of
requests from FinCEN for information
under this section. The requirements of
this paragraph (b)(3)(iv)(C) shall be
deemed satisfied to the extent that a
financial institution applies to such
information procedures that the
institution has established to satisfy the
requirements of section 501 of the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C.
6801), and applicable regulations issued
thereunder, with regard to the
protection of its customers’ nonpublic
personal information.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Relation to the Right to Financial
Privacy Act and the Gramm-LeachBliley Act. The information that a
financial institution is required to report
pursuant to paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this
section is information required to be
reported in accordance with a federal
statute or rule promulgated thereunder,
for purposes of subsection 3413(d) of
the Right to Financial Privacy Act (12
U.S.C. 3413(d)) and subsection 502(e)(8)
of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15
U.S.C. 6802(e)(8)).
(5) No effect on law enforcement or
regulatory investigations. Nothing in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:10 Feb 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
this subpart affects the authority of a
Federal, State or local law enforcement
agency or officer, or FinCEN or another
component of the Department of the
Treasury, to obtain information directly
from a financial institution.
accordance with law will continue to be
designated as presiding officers in such
matters. The appellate procedure is
unchanged.
Dated: February 4, 2010.
James H. Freis, Jr.,
Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network.
These revised rules will govern
proceedings under Part 965 docketed on
or after March 1, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2010–2928 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–02–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 965
Rules of Practice in Proceedings
Relative to Mail Disputes
This document revises the
rules of practice of the Postal Service’s
Office of the Judicial Officer to allow
qualified persons licensed to practice
law to be designated by the Judicial
Officer as presiding officers in
proceedings relating to mail disputes.
DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Judicial Officer Department,
United States Postal Service, 2101
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington,
VA 22201–3078.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Administrative Judge Gary E. Shapiro,
(703) 812–1910.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Executive Summary
39 CFR Part 965 contains the rules
governing proceedings involving Mail
Disputes. Only one change is made.
Paragraph (a) of section 965.4 of the
rules has defined the ‘‘presiding officer’’
as an Administrative Law Judge or an
Administrative Judge qualified in
accordance with law. The revised rule
expands the definition of presiding
officer to include any other qualified
person licensed to practice law
designated by the Judicial Officer to
preside over a proceeding conducted
pursuant to this part.
B. Summary of Change
Expanding the definition of presiding
officer in Part 965 is intended to permit
qualified staff counsel employed in the
Office of the Judicial Officer to be
designated as the initial presiding
official authorized to conduct
proceedings and issue Initial Decisions
in the resolution of mail disputes.
Administrative Law Judges and
Administrative Judges qualified in
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Administrative practice and
procedure, Mail disputes, Postal
Service.
■ For the reasons stated in the preamble,
the Postal Service amends 39 CFR Part
965 as set forth below:
■ 1. The authority citation for part 965
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 204, 401.
2. In § 965.4, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 965
■
Postal Service.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
C. Effective Dates and Applicability
§ 965.4
Presiding officers.
(a) The presiding officer shall be an
Administrative Law Judge, an
Administrative Judge qualified in
accordance with law, or any other
qualified person licensed to practice law
designated by the Judicial Officer to
preside over a proceeding conducted
pursuant to this part. The Judicial
Officer assigns cases under this part.
Judicial Officer includes Associate
Judicial Officer upon delegation thereto.
The Judicial Officer may, on his or her
own initiative or for good cause found,
preside at the reception of evidence.
*
*
*
*
*
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010–2844 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2009–0014; FRL–9113–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Louisiana; Baton Rouge 1-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area; Determination of
Attainment of the 1-Hour Ozone
Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The EPA has determined that
the Baton Rouge (BR) 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area has attained the 1hour ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS). This
E:\FR\FM\10FER1.SGM
10FER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 6570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2844]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 965
Rules of Practice in Proceedings Relative to Mail Disputes
AGENCY: Postal Service.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document revises the rules of practice of the Postal
Service's Office of the Judicial Officer to allow qualified persons
licensed to practice law to be designated by the Judicial Officer as
presiding officers in proceedings relating to mail disputes.
DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Judicial Officer Department, United States Postal Service,
2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22201-3078.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Administrative Judge Gary E. Shapiro,
(703) 812-1910.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Executive Summary
39 CFR Part 965 contains the rules governing proceedings involving
Mail Disputes. Only one change is made. Paragraph (a) of section 965.4
of the rules has defined the ``presiding officer'' as an Administrative
Law Judge or an Administrative Judge qualified in accordance with law.
The revised rule expands the definition of presiding officer to include
any other qualified person licensed to practice law designated by the
Judicial Officer to preside over a proceeding conducted pursuant to
this part.
B. Summary of Change
Expanding the definition of presiding officer in Part 965 is
intended to permit qualified staff counsel employed in the Office of
the Judicial Officer to be designated as the initial presiding official
authorized to conduct proceedings and issue Initial Decisions in the
resolution of mail disputes. Administrative Law Judges and
Administrative Judges qualified in accordance with law will continue to
be designated as presiding officers in such matters. The appellate
procedure is unchanged.
C. Effective Dates and Applicability
These revised rules will govern proceedings under Part 965 docketed
on or after March 1, 2010.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 965
Administrative practice and procedure, Mail disputes, Postal
Service.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Postal Service amends 39
CFR Part 965 as set forth below:
0
1. The authority citation for part 965 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 204, 401.
0
2. In Sec. 965.4, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 965.4 Presiding officers.
(a) The presiding officer shall be an Administrative Law Judge, an
Administrative Judge qualified in accordance with law, or any other
qualified person licensed to practice law designated by the Judicial
Officer to preside over a proceeding conducted pursuant to this part.
The Judicial Officer assigns cases under this part. Judicial Officer
includes Associate Judicial Officer upon delegation thereto. The
Judicial Officer may, on his or her own initiative or for good cause
found, preside at the reception of evidence.
* * * * *
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010-2844 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
