Lewis and Clark National Wildlife Refuge and Julia Butler Hansen Refuge for the Columbian White-Tailed Deer, 6694-6696 [2010-1292]
Download as PDF
6694
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
comments on this collection was
published on November 24, 2009 (74 FR
61363). No comments were received.
This notice provides the public with an
additional 30 days in which to comment
on the following information collection
activity:
Title: 30 CFR 882—Reclamation on
Private Land.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0057.
Summary: Public Law 95–87
authorizes Federal, State, and Tribal
governments to reclaim private lands
and allows for the establishment of
procedures for the recovery of the cost
of reclamation activities on privately
owned lands. These procedures are
intended to ensure that governments
have sufficient capability to file liens so
that certain landowners will not receive
a windfall from reclamation.
Bureau Form Number: None.
Frequency of Collection: Once.
Description of Respondents: State
governments and Indian tribes.
Total Annual Responses: 1.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 120.
Send comments on the need for the
collection of information for the
performance of the functions of the
agency; the accuracy of the agency’s
burden estimates; ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information collection; and ways to
minimize the information collection
burden on respondents, such as use of
automated means of collection of the
information, to the places listed in
ADDRESSES. Please refer to control
number 1029–0057 in all
correspondence.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information-may be
made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: February 4, 2010.
Steve M. Felch,
Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
[FR Doc. 2010–2759 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
Fish and Wildlife Service
[F–21905–51; LLAK964000–L14100000–
KC0000–P]
Alaska Native Claims Selection
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of decision approving
lands for conveyance.
SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR
2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an
appealable decision approving the
surface and subsurface estates in certain
lands for conveyance pursuant to the
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act
will be issued to Doyon, Limited. The
lands are in the vicinity of Tanana,
Alaska, and are located in:
Fairbanks Meridian, Alaska
T. 5 N., R. 24 W.,
Secs. 3, 4, 5, and 8;
Secs. 9, 33, 34, and 35.
Containing approximately 4,805 acres.
Notice of the decision will also be
published four times in the Fairbanks Daily
News-Miner.
DATES: The time limits for filing an
appeal are:
1. Any party claiming a property
interest which is adversely affected by
the decision shall have until March 12,
2010 to file an appeal.
2. Parties receiving service of the
decision by certified mail shall have 30
days from the date of receipt to file an
appeal.
Parties who do not file an appeal in
accordance with the requirements of 43
CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed
to have waived their rights.
A copy of the decision may
be obtained from: Bureau of Land
Management, Alaska State Office, 222
West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage,
Alaska 99513–7504.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Bureau of Land Management by phone
at 907–271–5960, or by e-mail at
ak.blm.conveyance@ak.blm.gov. Persons
who use a telecommunication device
(TTD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339, 24 hours a day, seven days a
week, to contact the Bureau of Land
Management.
Hillary Woods,
Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer
Adjudication I Branch.
BILLING CODE 4310–05–M
[FR Doc. 2010–2847 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:21 Feb 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FWS–R1–R–2009–N0112; 1265–0000–
10137–S3]
Lewis and Clark National Wildlife
Refuge and Julia Butler Hansen
Refuge for the Columbian White-Tailed
Deer
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
draft environmental impact statement;
request for comments.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our draft comprehensive
conservation plan and draft
environmental impact statement (CCP/
DEIS) for the Lewis and Clark National
Wildlife Refuge and Julia Butler Hansen
Refuge for the Columbian White-tailed
Deer (refuge or, collectively, refuges) for
public review and comment. The CCP/
DEIS describes our proposal for
managing the refuges for the next 15
years. Both refuges are managed as part
of the Willapa National Wildlife Refuge
Complex located in Ilwaco, WA.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by March
29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: More information on the
refuges is available on the Internet at
https://www.fws.gov/willapa. You may
submit comments, request a copy of the
CCP or EIS, or request more information
by either of the following methods:
E-mail:
FW1PlanningComments@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Lewis and Clark CCP’’ and/or
‘‘Julia Butler Hansen CCP’’ in the subject
line of the message.
U.S. Mail: Charlie Stenvall, Project
Leader, Willapa National Wildlife
Refuge Complex, 3888 SR 101, Ilwaco,
Washington 98624.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Charlie
Stenvall, Project Leader, (360) 484–
3482.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The CCP Process
The CCP/DEIS was prepared pursuant
to the National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) as amended (Refuge
Administration Act); the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) (NEPA); and the
Service’s Wilderness Stewardship
Policy (610 FW 3). The Refuge
Administration Act requires us to
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
develop a CCP for each national wildlife
refuge. The purpose of developing a
CCP is to provide refuge managers a 15year plan for achieving refuge purposes
and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife conservation, management,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction for conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation
and photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. As part of
a single planning process, the CCP/DEIS
covers both refuges. At the conclusion
of the planning process, the final
documentation will be separated into
two individual CCPs, one for each
refuge. We will review and update the
CCPs at least every 15 years in
accordance with the Refuge
Administration Act.
Public Outreach
We started the public scoping phase
of the CCP planning process by
publishing a Notice of Intent in the
Federal Register on September 21, 2006
(71 FR 55214), announcing our
intention to complete a CCP/EIS for the
refuges and inviting public comments.
A list of public involvement efforts we
have completed to date follows.
• In September 2006, we distributed
Planning Update 1 to our project
mailing list and public outlets located
near one or both refuges. In it, we
announced the initiation of the planning
process, invited the public to a series of
open house meetings, provided
background information on the refuges,
and requested public comments on
refuge management activities.
• Between October 17 and 24, 2006,
we held four public open house
meetings in communities near the
refuges to meet the public and obtain
comments on refuge management
issues. The meetings were announced
though local media via press releases,
Web sites, and in Planning Update 1.
• In February 2007, we distributed
Planning Update 2, which included a
summary of the public meetings and the
public comments we obtained at the
meetings and through other means, a
planning schedule, and draft vision
statements for the refuges.
Overview of the Refuges
The Julia Butler Hansen Refuge for the
Columbian White-tailed Deer was
established in 1971, specifically to
protect and manage habitat for the
endangered Columbian white-tailed
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:21 Feb 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
deer. The refuge contains over 6,000
acres of pastures, forested tidal swamps,
brushy woodlots, marshes, and sloughs
along the Columbia River, in
southwestern Washington and
northwestern Oregon. The refuge’s
Mainland Unit, Hunting Islands, and
Price Island are located in Washington.
The refuge’s Tenasillahe Island, Crims
Island, Wallace Island, and Westport
Unit are located in Oregon. The refuge
habitat protected for the Columbian
white-tailed deer also benefits a large
variety of wintering birds; a small herd
of Roosevelt elk; river otters; painted
turtles, red-legged frogs, and other
reptiles and amphibians; and several
pairs of nesting bald eagles and ospreys.
Staff members for both refuges are
located on the Julia Butler Hansen
Refuge for the Columbian White-tailed
Deer in Wahkiakum County, near the
town of Cathlamet, Washington.
The Lewis and Clark National
Wildlife Refuge was established in 1972
to preserve the vital fish and wildlife
habitat of the Columbia River estuary.
Riverine islands contain habitats
ranging from tidal sand flats and
marshes to forested swamps and upland
pastures. This combination supports
large numbers of migratory birds,
including waterfowl, waterbirds,
shorebirds, and a variety of raptors and
songbirds. The refuge’s islands are
accessible only by boat and include
approximately 18 named islands and a
number of unnamed islands and
marshes stretching over 25 miles of the
Columbia River.
Draft Alternatives We Are Considering
We drafted two alternatives for
managing the Lewis and Clark Refuge,
and three alternatives for managing the
Julia Butler Hansen Refuge. Draft
compatibility determinations for public
uses are also available as an appendix
to the CCP/DEIS. Brief descriptions of
the alternatives follow.
Lewis and Clark Refuge Alternative 1
This alternative assumes no change
from the current refuge management
programs. Habitat management would
consist of monitoring refuge islands and
treating invasive plant infestations as
funding allows. Refuge staff members
would continue to protect and maintain
wintering and foraging habitat for
migratory waterfowl, and nesting and
roosting habitat for bald eagles. Existing
public uses, including hunting, fishing,
and wildlife observation and
photography, would continue at current
levels.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6695
Lewis and Clark Refuge Alternative 2
Under Alternative 2 (the preferred
alternative), current wildlife and habitat
management would be maintained. Key
refuge enhancements would include
establishing or expanding partnerships
for managing invasive species,
recruiting graduate students to conduct
needed wildlife and habitat research,
and meeting with the Oregon
Department of State Lands to discuss
options for managing State lands within
the approved refuge acquisition
boundary. The refuge would work to
expand opportunities for public uses,
particularly wildlife observation and
photography. Refuge lands that meet the
basic criteria for wilderness would be
the subject of additional studies for a
potential wilderness recommendation.
Refuge staff would also work with
partners to ensure dredge-spoil islands
provide benefits for wildlife.
Julia Butler Hansen Refuge Alternative 1
Under Alternative 1, no changes to
the current refuge management
programs would occur. We would
continue to maintain and protect
habitats, establish early successional
riparian forest habitat, maintain
predator management January through
April, and continue wildlife-dependent
public use programs.
Julia Butler Hansen Refuge Alternative 2
Under Alternative 2 (the preferred
alternative), the refuge would make
certain changes, including closing a
small section of Steamboat Slough to
waterfowl hunting to improve public
safety. Refuge lands that meet the basic
criteria for wilderness would be the
subject of additional studies for a
potential wilderness recommendation.
To achieve the recovery goals for the
Columbia white-tailed deer, predator
management would take place on an asneeded basis year-round under this
alternative. We would expand the
Columbia white-tailed deer population
by establishing an experimental
population upriver. The wildlifedependent public use programs would
include developing two trails, opening
Crims and Price Islands to waterfowl
hunting, and improving print and
interpretive media.
Julia Butler Hansen Refuge Alternative 3
To achieve recovery goals for the
Columbian white-tailed deer, we would
conduct predator management January
through August. In addition, refuge
lands that meet the basic criteria for
wilderness would be the subject of
additional studies for a potential
wilderness recommendation. The
wildlife-dependent public use programs
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
6696
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices
would include developing a bicycle and
hiking trail, opening Crims and Price
Islands to waterfowl hunting, closing a
small section of Steamboat Slough to
waterfowl hunting to improve public
safety, installing new interpretive
exhibit panels, and developing
curriculum for the refuge study sites.
Public Availability of Documents
We encourage you to stay involved in
the CCP planning process by reviewing
and commenting on the proposals we
have developed in the CCP/DEIS.
Copies of the CCP/DEIS on CD–ROM are
available by request from Charlie
Stenvall, Project Leader, Willapa
National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 3888
SR 101, Ilwaco, WA 98624; phone (360)
484–3482. The Draft CCP/EIS will also
be available for viewing and
downloading on the Internet at https://
www.fws.gov/lc and https://
www.fws.gov/jbh. Printed copies of the
CCP/DEIS may be reviewed at the Julia
Butler Hansen Refuge for the Columbian
White-tailed Deer, 46 Steamboat Slough
Road, Cathlamet, WA 98612; Willapa
National Wildlife Refuge Complex
(address above); and at the following
libraries.
• Blanch Bradley Library, 100 Main
Street, Cathlamet, WA 98612.
• Astoria Public Library, 450 10th
Street, Astoria, OR 97103.
• Clatskanie Library District, 11
Lillich Street, Clatskanie, OR 97016.
• Ilwaco Timberline Regional Library,
158 1st Avenue, Ilwaco, WA 98624.
• Longview Public Library, 1600
Louisiana Street, Longview, WA 98632.
Next Steps
After this comment period ends, we
will analyze the comments and address
them in the form of a final CCP/EIS.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: January 15, 2010.
David J. Wesley,
Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2010–1292 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:21 Feb 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2009–N237; 80221–1113–
0000–C2]
Draft Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh
Ecosystems of Northern and Central
California
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability
for review and comment.
SUMMARY: We, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft recovery plan for
Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern
and Central California for public review
and comment. This draft recovery plan
is an expansion and revision of our 1984
California Clapper Rail and Salt Marsh
Harvest Mouse Recovery Plan. The plan
also addresses several federally
endangered plant species: Cirsium
hydrophilum var. hydrophilum (Suisun
thistle), Cordylanthus mollis ssp. mollis
(soft bird’s-beak), Suaeda californica
(California sea-blite), and the Morro Bay
portion of Cordylanthus maritimus ssp.
maritimus (salt marsh bird’s-beak).
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by June 10,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft recovery
plan are available by request from the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office,
2800 Cottage Way, Rm. W–2605,
Sacramento, CA 95825 (telephone: 916–
414–6600). An electronic copy of the
draft recovery plan is also available at
https://endangered.fws.gov/recovery/
index.html#plans.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh
Hull, Recovery Branch Chief, at the
above address or telephone number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened
animals and plants is a primary goal of
the Endangered Species Act (Act) (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and our endangered
species program. Recovery means
improvement of the status of listed
species to the point at which listing is
no longer required under the criteria set
out in section 4(a)(1) of the Act.
Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for the
conservation of the species, establish
criteria for downlisting or delisting
listed species, and estimate time and
cost for implementing the measures
needed for recovery. The Draft Recovery
Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Northern and Central California features
five endangered species. The biology of
these species is at the core of the draft
recovery plan, but the goal of this
recovery planning effort is the
comprehensive restoration and
management of tidal marsh ecosystems.
This draft recovery plan is an
expansion and revision of The
California Clapper Rail and Salt Marsh
Harvest Mouse Recovery Plan (Service
1984). Since that time a great deal of
effort has been dedicated to recovery
and conservation activities, and
additional information has been
obtained through research and
observation that allows us to better
focus our recovery strategy. The historic
distribution of the California clapper
rail encompasses major tidal salt
marshes between Humboldt Bay and,
arguably, Morro Bay. This distribution
defines the approximate geographic
scope of this draft recovery plan.
The plan also covers three federally
endangered plant species and the
northernmost population of an
additional federally endangered plant
species. Two of the species, Cirsium
hydrophilum var. hydrophilum (Suisun
thistle) and Cordylanthus mollis ssp.
mollis (soft bird’s-beak), are restricted to
the northern reaches of the San
Francisco Bay Estuary. The other
endangered tidal marsh plant, Suaeda
californica (California sea-blite),
historically occurred in both San
Francisco Bay and Morro Bay; however,
except for three reintroductions to San
Francisco Bay, it is now restricted to
Morro Bay. Another federally listed
plant, Cordylanthus maritimus ssp.
maritimus (salt marsh bird’s-beak), has
its northern range limit in Morro Bay.
Morro Bay was omitted from the Salt
Marsh Bird’s Beak Recovery Plan
(Service 1985a) because the taxonomic
interpretation at the time classified this
population in another subspecies that is
not federally listed. The current
taxonomy includes the Morro Bay
population as Cordylanthus maritimus
ssp. maritimus. It is included in this
draft recovery plan due to its colocation
with Suaeda californica in Morro Bay.
Recovery strategies and actions are
provided for the Morro Bay population
of Cordylanthus maritimus ssp.
maritimus. However, because we do not
consider the entire range of the species
in this document, recovery criteria have
not been included. This draft recovery
plan also addresses 11 species of
concern: The salt marsh wandering
shrew (Sorex vagrans halicoetes),
Suisun shrew (Sorex ornatus sinuosus),
San Pablo vole (Microtus californicus
sanpabloensis), California black rail
(Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus),
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6694-6696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1292]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-R-2009-N0112; 1265-0000-10137-S3]
Lewis and Clark National Wildlife Refuge and Julia Butler Hansen
Refuge for the Columbian White-Tailed Deer
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft comprehensive conservation plan
and draft environmental impact statement; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our draft comprehensive conservation plan and draft
environmental impact statement (CCP/DEIS) for the Lewis and Clark
National Wildlife Refuge and Julia Butler Hansen Refuge for the
Columbian White-tailed Deer (refuge or, collectively, refuges) for
public review and comment. The CCP/DEIS describes our proposal for
managing the refuges for the next 15 years. Both refuges are managed as
part of the Willapa National Wildlife Refuge Complex located in Ilwaco,
WA.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
March 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: More information on the refuges is available on the Internet
at https://www.fws.gov/willapa. You may submit comments, request a copy
of the CCP or EIS, or request more information by either of the
following methods:
E-mail: FW1PlanningComments@fws.gov. Include ``Lewis and Clark
CCP'' and/or ``Julia Butler Hansen CCP'' in the subject line of the
message.
U.S. Mail: Charlie Stenvall, Project Leader, Willapa National
Wildlife Refuge Complex, 3888 SR 101, Ilwaco, Washington 98624.
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Charlie Stenvall, Project Leader, (360)
484-3482.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The CCP Process
The CCP/DEIS was prepared pursuant to the National Wildlife Refuge
System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) as amended
(Refuge Administration Act); the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) (NEPA); and the Service's Wilderness
Stewardship Policy (610 FW 3). The Refuge Administration Act requires
us to
[[Page 6695]]
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose of
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of
fish and wildlife conservation, management, legal mandates, and our
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction for
conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and
environmental education and interpretation. As part of a single
planning process, the CCP/DEIS covers both refuges. At the conclusion
of the planning process, the final documentation will be separated into
two individual CCPs, one for each refuge. We will review and update the
CCPs at least every 15 years in accordance with the Refuge
Administration Act.
Public Outreach
We started the public scoping phase of the CCP planning process by
publishing a Notice of Intent in the Federal Register on September 21,
2006 (71 FR 55214), announcing our intention to complete a CCP/EIS for
the refuges and inviting public comments. A list of public involvement
efforts we have completed to date follows.
In September 2006, we distributed Planning Update 1 to our
project mailing list and public outlets located near one or both
refuges. In it, we announced the initiation of the planning process,
invited the public to a series of open house meetings, provided
background information on the refuges, and requested public comments on
refuge management activities.
Between October 17 and 24, 2006, we held four public open
house meetings in communities near the refuges to meet the public and
obtain comments on refuge management issues. The meetings were
announced though local media via press releases, Web sites, and in
Planning Update 1.
In February 2007, we distributed Planning Update 2, which
included a summary of the public meetings and the public comments we
obtained at the meetings and through other means, a planning schedule,
and draft vision statements for the refuges.
Overview of the Refuges
The Julia Butler Hansen Refuge for the Columbian White-tailed Deer
was established in 1971, specifically to protect and manage habitat for
the endangered Columbian white-tailed deer. The refuge contains over
6,000 acres of pastures, forested tidal swamps, brushy woodlots,
marshes, and sloughs along the Columbia River, in southwestern
Washington and northwestern Oregon. The refuge's Mainland Unit, Hunting
Islands, and Price Island are located in Washington. The refuge's
Tenasillahe Island, Crims Island, Wallace Island, and Westport Unit are
located in Oregon. The refuge habitat protected for the Columbian
white-tailed deer also benefits a large variety of wintering birds; a
small herd of Roosevelt elk; river otters; painted turtles, red-legged
frogs, and other reptiles and amphibians; and several pairs of nesting
bald eagles and ospreys. Staff members for both refuges are located on
the Julia Butler Hansen Refuge for the Columbian White-tailed Deer in
Wahkiakum County, near the town of Cathlamet, Washington.
The Lewis and Clark National Wildlife Refuge was established in
1972 to preserve the vital fish and wildlife habitat of the Columbia
River estuary. Riverine islands contain habitats ranging from tidal
sand flats and marshes to forested swamps and upland pastures. This
combination supports large numbers of migratory birds, including
waterfowl, waterbirds, shorebirds, and a variety of raptors and
songbirds. The refuge's islands are accessible only by boat and include
approximately 18 named islands and a number of unnamed islands and
marshes stretching over 25 miles of the Columbia River.
Draft Alternatives We Are Considering
We drafted two alternatives for managing the Lewis and Clark
Refuge, and three alternatives for managing the Julia Butler Hansen
Refuge. Draft compatibility determinations for public uses are also
available as an appendix to the CCP/DEIS. Brief descriptions of the
alternatives follow.
Lewis and Clark Refuge Alternative 1
This alternative assumes no change from the current refuge
management programs. Habitat management would consist of monitoring
refuge islands and treating invasive plant infestations as funding
allows. Refuge staff members would continue to protect and maintain
wintering and foraging habitat for migratory waterfowl, and nesting and
roosting habitat for bald eagles. Existing public uses, including
hunting, fishing, and wildlife observation and photography, would
continue at current levels.
Lewis and Clark Refuge Alternative 2
Under Alternative 2 (the preferred alternative), current wildlife
and habitat management would be maintained. Key refuge enhancements
would include establishing or expanding partnerships for managing
invasive species, recruiting graduate students to conduct needed
wildlife and habitat research, and meeting with the Oregon Department
of State Lands to discuss options for managing State lands within the
approved refuge acquisition boundary. The refuge would work to expand
opportunities for public uses, particularly wildlife observation and
photography. Refuge lands that meet the basic criteria for wilderness
would be the subject of additional studies for a potential wilderness
recommendation. Refuge staff would also work with partners to ensure
dredge-spoil islands provide benefits for wildlife.
Julia Butler Hansen Refuge Alternative 1
Under Alternative 1, no changes to the current refuge management
programs would occur. We would continue to maintain and protect
habitats, establish early successional riparian forest habitat,
maintain predator management January through April, and continue
wildlife-dependent public use programs.
Julia Butler Hansen Refuge Alternative 2
Under Alternative 2 (the preferred alternative), the refuge would
make certain changes, including closing a small section of Steamboat
Slough to waterfowl hunting to improve public safety. Refuge lands that
meet the basic criteria for wilderness would be the subject of
additional studies for a potential wilderness recommendation. To
achieve the recovery goals for the Columbia white-tailed deer, predator
management would take place on an as-needed basis year-round under this
alternative. We would expand the Columbia white-tailed deer population
by establishing an experimental population upriver. The wildlife-
dependent public use programs would include developing two trails,
opening Crims and Price Islands to waterfowl hunting, and improving
print and interpretive media.
Julia Butler Hansen Refuge Alternative 3
To achieve recovery goals for the Columbian white-tailed deer, we
would conduct predator management January through August. In addition,
refuge lands that meet the basic criteria for wilderness would be the
subject of additional studies for a potential wilderness
recommendation. The wildlife-dependent public use programs
[[Page 6696]]
would include developing a bicycle and hiking trail, opening Crims and
Price Islands to waterfowl hunting, closing a small section of
Steamboat Slough to waterfowl hunting to improve public safety,
installing new interpretive exhibit panels, and developing curriculum
for the refuge study sites.
Public Availability of Documents
We encourage you to stay involved in the CCP planning process by
reviewing and commenting on the proposals we have developed in the CCP/
DEIS. Copies of the CCP/DEIS on CD-ROM are available by request from
Charlie Stenvall, Project Leader, Willapa National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, 3888 SR 101, Ilwaco, WA 98624; phone (360) 484-3482. The Draft
CCP/EIS will also be available for viewing and downloading on the
Internet at https://www.fws.gov/lc and https://www.fws.gov/jbh. Printed
copies of the CCP/DEIS may be reviewed at the Julia Butler Hansen
Refuge for the Columbian White-tailed Deer, 46 Steamboat Slough Road,
Cathlamet, WA 98612; Willapa National Wildlife Refuge Complex (address
above); and at the following libraries.
Blanch Bradley Library, 100 Main Street, Cathlamet, WA
98612.
Astoria Public Library, 450 10th Street, Astoria, OR
97103.
Clatskanie Library District, 11 Lillich Street,
Clatskanie, OR 97016.
Ilwaco Timberline Regional Library, 158 1st Avenue,
Ilwaco, WA 98624.
Longview Public Library, 1600 Louisiana Street, Longview,
WA 98632.
Next Steps
After this comment period ends, we will analyze the comments and
address them in the form of a final CCP/EIS.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: January 15, 2010.
David J. Wesley,
Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2010-1292 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P