Consumer Interface With the Smart Grid, 6414-6416 [2010-2813]
Download as PDF
6414
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2010 / Notices
Week of March 1, 2010—Tentative
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
9:30 a.m. Briefing on Uranium
Recovery (Public Meeting).
(Contact: Dominick Orlando, 301–
415–6749.)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov.
[License No. 05/75–0257]
Week of March 8, 2010—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 8, 2010.
Cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Week of March 15, 2010—Tentative
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
1:30 p.m. Joint Meeting of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission and
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
on Grid Reliability (Public
Meeting). (Contact: Kenn Miller,
(301) 415–3152.)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov.
*
*
*
*
*
* The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. To verify the status of meetings,
call (recording)—(301) 415–1292.
Contact person for more information:
Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415–1651.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policymaking/schedule.html.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify Angela
Bolduc, Chief, Employee/Labor
Relations and Work Life Branch, at 301–
492–2230, TDD: 301–415–2100, or by email at angela.bolduc@nrc.gov.
Determinations on requests for
reasonable accommodation will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
This notice is distributed
electronically to subscribers. If you no
longer wish to receive it, or would like
to be added to the distribution, please
contact the Office of the Secretary,
Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969),
or send an e-mail to
darlene.wright@nrc.gov.
[FR Doc. 2010–2964 Filed 2–5–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
14:39 Feb 08, 2010
Notice is hereby given that Cardinal
Growth, L.P., 311 South Wacker Driver,
Suite 5500, Chicago, IL 60606, a Federal
Licensee under the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958, as amended
(‘‘the Act’’), in connection with the
financing of a small concern, has sought
an exemption under Section 312 of the
Act and Section 107.730, Financings
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of
the Small Business Administration
(‘‘SBA’’) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR
107.730). Cardinal Growth, L.P.
provided financing to GreenRock
Environmental Management, Inc., 1400
West Carroll Avenue, Chicago, IL 60607.
The financing was used to purchase
office and computer related equipment
for the small business.
The financing is brought within the
purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the
Regulations because the CEO of
GreenRock Environmental Management,
Inc. assumed financial responsibilities
at Cardinal Growth, L.P. within 6
months of the financing. According to
the definition of Associate in § 107.50,
Section 10 if an Associate relationship
exists at any time within 6 months
before or after the date of a Financing,
then the Associate relationship is
considered to exist on the date of the
Financing.
Therefore, this transaction is
considered a financing of an Associate
requiring an exemption. Notice is
hereby given that any interested person
may submit written comments on the
transaction within fifteen days of the
date of this publication to the Associate
Administrator for Investment, U.S.
Small Business Administration, 409
Third Street, SW., Washington, DC
20416.
Dated: January 6, 2010.
Sean Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2010–2717 Filed 2–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Jkt 220001
AGENCY: Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP), Executive
Office of the President.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: With this notice, the Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
within the Executive Office of the
President requests input from the public
regarding the consumer interface with
the modernized electric grid (‘‘Smart
Grid’’), which is a vital component of
the President’s comprehensive energy
plan. In particular, we seek comments
on issues related to Smart Grid
implementation options, including the
ways in which each option would
support open innovation in home
energy services. This Request for
Information (RFI) will be active from
February 10, 2010 to February 19, 2010.
Respondents are invited to respond
online via the Smart Grid Forum at
https://blog.ostp.gov/category/smart-grid,
or may submit responses via electronic
mail. Electronic mail responses will be
re-posted on the online forum.
Instructions are provided at https://
blog.ostp.gov/category/smart-grid.
DATES: Comments must be received by
5 p.m. EST on February 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by one of
the following methods:
• Smart Grid Forum: https://
blog.ostp.gov/category/smart-grid.
• Via E-mail: smartgrid@ostp.gov.
• Mail: Office of Science and
Technology Policy, Attn: Open
Government Recommendations, 725
17th Street, Washington, DC 20502.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice may be made available to the
public online or by alternative means.
For this reason, please do not include in
your comments information of a
confidential nature, such as sensitive
personal information or proprietary
information. If you submit an e-mail
comment, your e-mail address will be
captured automatically and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Kevin Hurst, Assistant Director for
Energy Technology, Office of Science
and Technology Policy, Executive Office
of the President, Attn: Open
Government, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20502, 202–456–7116.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Consumer Interface With the Smart
Grid
Dated: February 4, 2010.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Office of the Secretary.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Cardinal Growth, L.P.; Notice Seeking
Exemption Under Section 312 of the
Small Business Investment Act,
Conflicts of Interest
ACTION: Notice; request for public
comment.
Modernization of the Nation’s electric
grid is a vital component of the
President’s comprehensive energy plan,
which aims to reduce U.S. dependence
on foreign oil, create jobs, and help U.S.
industry compete successfully in global
markets for clean energy technology.
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2010 / Notices
Seventy-two percent of the Nation’s
electricity is consumed in buildings,
and nearly half of that is in homes.
Optimizing building energy
consumption, especially during peak
load periods, can improve the
reliability, security, and efficiency of the
electric grid while reducing energy costs
to consumers. The ‘‘Smart Grid’’—a
modernized electricity transmission and
distribution system involving the
increased use of digital information and
controls technology—can help to realize
these benefits. Demand-side Smart Grid
technologies include ‘‘smart meters’’
(which provide two-way, near-real-time
data communications between the
utility and consumer premises), ‘‘smart
appliances’’ (which provide data
communications and control options),
and ‘‘smart interfaces’’ that can integrate
distributed energy resources, demand
response resources, or other energy
loads and storage devices such as plugin electric and hybrid electric vehicles.
The Smart Grid will help to provide
consumers with the information,
automation, and tools they need to
control and optimize energy use. This
control and optimization requires
interoperability and information
exchange between the grid and a wide
variety of energy-using devices and
controllers, such as thermostats, water
heaters, appliances, consumer
electronics, and energy management
systems. The Department of Energy
(DOE) Smart Grid Investment Grant
program, funded by the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act, is
accelerating deployment of smart meters
and other components of an advanced
electric grid.
In many instances, smart meters will
have the capability to communicate
near-real-time measurements of
electricity usage to the utility and the
consumer. In some implementations,
data can be provided to the consumer
directly from the smart meter (or
another monitoring device) through an
in-home display or energy management
system via a local communications
interface. In other implementations,
consumers or their authorized agents
can obtain their usage data via the
internet from an information system at
the utility.
One of the goals of the Smart Grid is
to enable innovation and competition in
new products and services that can help
consumers minimize both peak and
overall energy usage and save money.
To be most effective, the Smart Grid will
need to provide not only usage data but
also information such as electricity
price data and demand response signals
to the consumer and energy-using
devices in the home. This information
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:39 Feb 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
could be provided to the consumer’s
home devices either through the smart
meter’s local communication interface
or through a separate gateway, provided
either by the utility or a third-party
service provider. In order to clarify the
various implementation options, we
seek comments on issues related to the
demand-side Smart Grid architecture,
including potential costs, benefits,
implementation hurdles, and the ways
in which each option would support
open innovation in home energy
services.
A robust, secure, and flexible
architecture based on open standards is
needed for information exchange
between the home and the Smart Grid.
Section 1305 of the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007
advises that the Smart Grid
interoperability framework be designed
to ‘‘* * * consider the use of voluntary
uniform standards for certain classes of
mass-produced electric appliances and
equipment for homes and businesses
that enable customers, at their election
and consistent with applicable State and
Federal laws, and are manufactured
with the ability to respond to electric
grid emergencies and demand response
signals’’ * * *. The diversity of
communications technologies and
standards used by devices in the home
presents a significant challenge to
achieving interoperability. A balance
must be struck between maximizing
innovation and customer choice, while
ensuring reliability and a sufficiently
standardized environment so that
manufacturers can produce costeffective Smart Grid-enabled appliances
that work anywhere in the Nation. That
balance must also include the need for
cost-effective Smart Grid infrastructure.
In addition, ensuring cyber security in
the home-to-grid interface is a critical
consideration.
The Smart Grid must provide benefits
to a wide variety of consumers. Some
consumers who have many energy-using
appliances and devices may wish to
have the grid interoperate with an
existing home area network and a
sophisticated home energy management
system. Other consumers with simpler
circumstances may not have the desire,
skill, or means to configure a home area
network and may simply wish to plug
in a new, Smart-Grid-enabled appliance
and have it automatically communicate
with the grid in order to realize energysaving benefits. The diversity of
consumer needs must be considered in
the design and deployment of Smart
Grid infrastructure and devices.
The Executive Branch is considering
ways to ensure that the consumer
interface to the Smart Grid achieves the
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6415
desired goal of providing all consumers
with the information they need to
control and optimize their energy use in
a manner that ensures ease of use,
widespread adoption, and innovation.
The National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST), pursuant to the
Energy Independence and Security Act
of 2007, recently published the first
release of an interoperability framework
for the Smart Grid (NIST Special
Publication 1108, available at https://
www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/
smartgrid_interoperability_final.pdf),
which includes discussion of these
issues and identifies the need for further
work to provide solutions.
II. Invitation To Comment
Input is welcome on issues related to
the architecture of the consumer
interface with the Smart Grid as well as
consumer ownership of Smart Grid data.
Questions that individuals may wish to
address include, but are not limited to
the following. As part of your
submission, please indicate the question
to which your answer responds.
1. Should the smart meter serve as the
primary gateway for residential energy
usage data, price data, and demand
response signals? What are the most
important factors in making this
assessment, and how might those factors
change over time?
2. Should a data gateway other than
the smart meter be used for all or a
subset of the data described in question
1?
3. If the smart meter, via the utility
network, is the primary gateway for the
data described in question 1, will
consumers and their authorized thirdparty service providers be able to access
the data easily and in real time?
4. Who owns the home energy usage
data? Should individual consumers and
their authorized third-party service
providers have the right to access energy
usage data directly from the meter?
5. How are low-income consumers
best served by home-to-grid technology?
6. What alternative architectures
involving real-time (or near-real-time)
electricity usage and price data are there
that could support open innovation in
home energy services?
Please note that several important
Smart Grid topics—including Federal
and State policy hurdles, appliance
interoperability standards, cyber
security, and business case challenges—
are beyond the scope of this request,
except insofar as they bear on the
primary topics identified above. One or
more future requests for comment may
be organized to obtain input on these
additional issues. Discussions of all of
the above topics are also ongoing in
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
6416
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2010 / Notices
several forums, including the Smart
Grid Interoperability Panel established
by NIST and the GridWise Architecture
Council established by DOE. Relevant
input received through this request will
be shared with NIST, DOE, and other
interested Federal agencies.
M. David Hodge,
Operations Manager.
[FR Doc. 2010–2813 Filed 2–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Extension:
Form F–7; OMB Control No. 3235– 0383;
SEC File No. 270–331.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget this
request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information
discussed below.
Form F–7 (17 CFR 239.37) is a
registration statement under the
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et
seq.) used to register securities that are
offered for cash upon the exercise of
rights that are granted to a registrant’s
existing security holders to purchase or
subscribe such securities. The
information collected is intended to
ensure that the information required to
be filed by the Commission permits
verification of compliance with
securities law requirements and assures
the public availability of such
information. The information provided
is mandatory and all information is
made available to the public upon
request. Form F–7 takes approximately
4 hours per response to prepare and is
filed by approximately 5 respondents.
We estimate that 25% of 4 hours per
response (one hour) is prepared by the
company for a total annual reporting
burden of 5 hours (one hour per
response × 5 responses).
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
Written comments regarding the
above information should be directed to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:39 Feb 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
the following persons: (i) Desk Officer
for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102,
New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503 or send an email to: Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov;
and (ii) Charles Boucher, Director/CIO,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General
Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312;
or send an e-mail to
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
the following persons: (i) Desk Officer
for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102,
New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503 or send an email to: Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov;
and (ii) Charles Boucher, Director/CIO,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General
Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312, or
send an e-mail to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
Dated: February 1, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
Dated: February 1, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–2735 Filed 2–8–10; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2010–2736 Filed 2–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Upon Written Request; Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Form 18–K; OMB Control No. 3235–0120;
SEC File No. 270–108.
Extensions:
Rule 12d1–3; OMB Control No. 3235–0109;
SEC File No. 270–116.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget this
request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information
discussed below.
Form 18–K (17 CFR 249.318) is an
annual report form used by foreign
governments and political subdivisions
that have securities listed on a U.S.
securities exchange. The information to
be collected is intended to ensure the
adequacy of information available to
investors in the registration of securities
and assures public availability. The
information provided is mandatory.
Form 18–K is a public document. Form
18–K takes approximately 8 hours to
prepare and is filed by approximately
143 respondents for a total annual
reporting burden of 1,144 hours.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
Written comments regarding the
above information should be directed to
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget this
request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information
discussed below.
Exchange Act Rule 12d1–3 (17 CFR
240.12d1–3) requires a certification that
a security has been approved by an
exchange for listing and registration
pursuant to Section 12(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78l(d)) to be filed with the
Commission. The information required
under Rule 12d1–3 must be filed with
the Commission and is publicly
available. We estimate that it takes
approximately one-half hour to provide
the information required under Rule
12d1–3 and that the information is filed
by approximately 688 respondents
annually for a total annual reporting
burden of 344 burden hours (.5 hours
per response × 688 responses).
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6414-6416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2813]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Consumer Interface With the Smart Grid
AGENCY: Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), Executive
Office of the President.
ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: With this notice, the Office of Science and Technology Policy
(OSTP) within the Executive Office of the President requests input from
the public regarding the consumer interface with the modernized
electric grid (``Smart Grid''), which is a vital component of the
President's comprehensive energy plan. In particular, we seek comments
on issues related to Smart Grid implementation options, including the
ways in which each option would support open innovation in home energy
services. This Request for Information (RFI) will be active from
February 10, 2010 to February 19, 2010. Respondents are invited to
respond online via the Smart Grid Forum at https://blog.ostp.gov/category/smart-grid, or may submit responses via electronic mail.
Electronic mail responses will be re-posted on the online forum.
Instructions are provided at https://blog.ostp.gov/category/smart-grid.
DATES: Comments must be received by 5 p.m. EST on February 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by one of the following methods:
Smart Grid Forum: https://blog.ostp.gov/category/smart-grid.
Via E-mail: smartgrid@ostp.gov.
Mail: Office of Science and Technology Policy, Attn: Open
Government Recommendations, 725 17th Street, Washington, DC 20502.
Comments submitted in response to this notice may be made available
to the public online or by alternative means. For this reason, please
do not include in your comments information of a confidential nature,
such as sensitive personal information or proprietary information. If
you submit an e-mail comment, your e-mail address will be captured
automatically and included as part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the Internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Kevin Hurst, Assistant Director
for Energy Technology, Office of Science and Technology Policy,
Executive Office of the President, Attn: Open Government, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20502, 202-456-7116.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Modernization of the Nation's electric grid is a vital component of
the President's comprehensive energy plan, which aims to reduce U.S.
dependence on foreign oil, create jobs, and help U.S. industry compete
successfully in global markets for clean energy technology.
[[Page 6415]]
Seventy-two percent of the Nation's electricity is consumed in
buildings, and nearly half of that is in homes. Optimizing building
energy consumption, especially during peak load periods, can improve
the reliability, security, and efficiency of the electric grid while
reducing energy costs to consumers. The ``Smart Grid''--a modernized
electricity transmission and distribution system involving the
increased use of digital information and controls technology--can help
to realize these benefits. Demand-side Smart Grid technologies include
``smart meters'' (which provide two-way, near-real-time data
communications between the utility and consumer premises), ``smart
appliances'' (which provide data communications and control options),
and ``smart interfaces'' that can integrate distributed energy
resources, demand response resources, or other energy loads and storage
devices such as plug-in electric and hybrid electric vehicles.
The Smart Grid will help to provide consumers with the information,
automation, and tools they need to control and optimize energy use.
This control and optimization requires interoperability and information
exchange between the grid and a wide variety of energy-using devices
and controllers, such as thermostats, water heaters, appliances,
consumer electronics, and energy management systems. The Department of
Energy (DOE) Smart Grid Investment Grant program, funded by the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, is accelerating deployment of
smart meters and other components of an advanced electric grid.
In many instances, smart meters will have the capability to
communicate near-real-time measurements of electricity usage to the
utility and the consumer. In some implementations, data can be provided
to the consumer directly from the smart meter (or another monitoring
device) through an in-home display or energy management system via a
local communications interface. In other implementations, consumers or
their authorized agents can obtain their usage data via the internet
from an information system at the utility.
One of the goals of the Smart Grid is to enable innovation and
competition in new products and services that can help consumers
minimize both peak and overall energy usage and save money. To be most
effective, the Smart Grid will need to provide not only usage data but
also information such as electricity price data and demand response
signals to the consumer and energy-using devices in the home. This
information could be provided to the consumer's home devices either
through the smart meter's local communication interface or through a
separate gateway, provided either by the utility or a third-party
service provider. In order to clarify the various implementation
options, we seek comments on issues related to the demand-side Smart
Grid architecture, including potential costs, benefits, implementation
hurdles, and the ways in which each option would support open
innovation in home energy services.
A robust, secure, and flexible architecture based on open standards
is needed for information exchange between the home and the Smart Grid.
Section 1305 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
advises that the Smart Grid interoperability framework be designed to
``* * * consider the use of voluntary uniform standards for certain
classes of mass-produced electric appliances and equipment for homes
and businesses that enable customers, at their election and consistent
with applicable State and Federal laws, and are manufactured with the
ability to respond to electric grid emergencies and demand response
signals'' * * *. The diversity of communications technologies and
standards used by devices in the home presents a significant challenge
to achieving interoperability. A balance must be struck between
maximizing innovation and customer choice, while ensuring reliability
and a sufficiently standardized environment so that manufacturers can
produce cost-effective Smart Grid-enabled appliances that work anywhere
in the Nation. That balance must also include the need for cost-
effective Smart Grid infrastructure. In addition, ensuring cyber
security in the home-to-grid interface is a critical consideration.
The Smart Grid must provide benefits to a wide variety of
consumers. Some consumers who have many energy-using appliances and
devices may wish to have the grid interoperate with an existing home
area network and a sophisticated home energy management system. Other
consumers with simpler circumstances may not have the desire, skill, or
means to configure a home area network and may simply wish to plug in a
new, Smart-Grid-enabled appliance and have it automatically communicate
with the grid in order to realize energy-saving benefits. The diversity
of consumer needs must be considered in the design and deployment of
Smart Grid infrastructure and devices.
The Executive Branch is considering ways to ensure that the
consumer interface to the Smart Grid achieves the desired goal of
providing all consumers with the information they need to control and
optimize their energy use in a manner that ensures ease of use,
widespread adoption, and innovation. The National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST), pursuant to the Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007, recently published the first release of an
interoperability framework for the Smart Grid (NIST Special Publication
1108, available at https://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/smartgrid_interoperability_final.pdf), which includes discussion of
these issues and identifies the need for further work to provide
solutions.
II. Invitation To Comment
Input is welcome on issues related to the architecture of the
consumer interface with the Smart Grid as well as consumer ownership of
Smart Grid data. Questions that individuals may wish to address
include, but are not limited to the following. As part of your
submission, please indicate the question to which your answer responds.
1. Should the smart meter serve as the primary gateway for
residential energy usage data, price data, and demand response signals?
What are the most important factors in making this assessment, and how
might those factors change over time?
2. Should a data gateway other than the smart meter be used for all
or a subset of the data described in question 1?
3. If the smart meter, via the utility network, is the primary
gateway for the data described in question 1, will consumers and their
authorized third-party service providers be able to access the data
easily and in real time?
4. Who owns the home energy usage data? Should individual consumers
and their authorized third-party service providers have the right to
access energy usage data directly from the meter?
5. How are low-income consumers best served by home-to-grid
technology?
6. What alternative architectures involving real-time (or near-
real-time) electricity usage and price data are there that could
support open innovation in home energy services?
Please note that several important Smart Grid topics--including
Federal and State policy hurdles, appliance interoperability standards,
cyber security, and business case challenges--are beyond the scope of
this request, except insofar as they bear on the primary topics
identified above. One or more future requests for comment may be
organized to obtain input on these additional issues. Discussions of
all of the above topics are also ongoing in
[[Page 6416]]
several forums, including the Smart Grid Interoperability Panel
established by NIST and the GridWise Architecture Council established
by DOE. Relevant input received through this request will be shared
with NIST, DOE, and other interested Federal agencies.
M. David Hodge,
Operations Manager.
[FR Doc. 2010-2813 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P