Deposit of Biological Materials, 6348-6349 [2010-2764]
Download as PDF
6348
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2010 / Notices
we have not detected citrus black spot.
However, if it were detected, export of
the host material to the United States
would be suspended from the
production area and APHIS would
request South Africa to conduct an
investigation.
Therefore, in accordance with
§ 319.56-5(c), we are announcing the
Administrator’s determination that the
magisterial districts of Boshof,
Fauresmith, Jacobsdal, Koffiefontein,
and Philippolis in the Free State
Province; Christiania and Taung in the
North West Province; and Barkly-wes/
west, Gordonia, Hay, Herbert,
Hopetown, Kenhardt, Kimberely,
Namakwaland, and Prieska in the
Northern Cape Province meet the
criteria of § 319.56-5(a) and (b) with
respect to freedom from citrus black
spot. Accordingly, we are recognizing
those magisterial districts as pest-free
areas for citrus black spot and have
added them to the list of pest-free areas,
which may be viewed on the Internet at
(https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
import_export/plants/manuals/ports/
downloads/
DesignatedPestFreeAreas.pdf). The list
of pest-free areas may also be obtained
from the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Done in Washington, DC, this 3rd day
of February 2010.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–2846 Filed 2–8–10: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–S
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
Cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal
Advisory Committee (LTFAC) will hold
a meeting on February 23, 2010 at Sierra
Nevada College, 999 Tahoe Boulevard,
Incline Village, Nevada 89451–9500.
This Committee, established by the
Secretary of Agriculture on December
15, 1998 (64 FR 2876), is chartered to
provide advice to the Secretary on
implementing the terms of the Federal
Interagency Partnership on the Lake
Tahoe Region and other matters raised
by the Secretary.
DATES: The meeting will be held
February 23, 2010 beginning at 9 a.m.
and ending at 4 p.m.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:39 Feb 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
The meeting will be held at
Sierra Nevada College, 999 Tahoe
Boulevard, Incline Village, Nevada
89451–9500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arla
Hams, Lake Tahoe Basin Management
Unit (LTBMU), Forest Service, 35
College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA
96150, (530) 543–2773.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Items to
be covered on the agenda include:
• The Tahoe Working Group (TWG)
will present their Lake Tahoe Southern
Nevada Public Land Management Act
(SNPLMA) Round 11 recommendation
for capital projects and science themes.
The LTFAC will discuss and with
possible consensus, put forward a
preliminary recommendation for public
comment.
• Discuss the status of re-chartering
and member nominations for the next
LTFAC two year term.
• Public Comment.
Issues may be brought to the attention
of the Committee during the open
public comment period at the meeting
or by filing written statements for the
Committee before or after the meeting.
Please refer any written comments
attention Arla Hams, Lake Tahoe Basin
Management Unit at the contact address
stated above.
If you have questions concerning
special needs for this public meeting, or
to request sign language interpretation,
contact Linda Lind at (530) 543–2787 or
TTY (530) 543–0956, or via e-mail at
LLind@fs.fed.us.
If another LTFAC meeting is needed
to put forth the Round 11 preliminary
recommendation for capital projects and
science themes; due to time restraints
the Federal Register notice will be
published less than 15 calendar days
prior to the meeting. There will be
timely meeting notification through the
LTBMU Web site (https://www.fs.fed.us/
r5/ltbmu/local/ltfac).
ADDRESSES:
Dated: February 2, 2010.
Terri Marceron,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010–2671 Filed 2–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Deposit of Biological Materials
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment
request.
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on this continuing
information collection, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before April 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘0651–0022 Deposit of
Biological Materials comment’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the
attention of Susan K. Fawcett.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to the attention of
Brian Hanlon, Director, Office of Patent
Legal Administration, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by
telephone at 571–272–5047; or by e-mail
at Brian.Hanlon@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The deposit of biological materials as
part of a patent application is required
by 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2) and outlined in 37
CFR Ch. 1, Subpart G, 1.801–1.809.
Every patent must contain a description
of the invention sufficient to enable a
person (knowledgeable in the relevant
science), to make and use the invention
as specified by 35 U.S.C. 112. The term
biological includes material that is
capable of self-replication either directly
or indirectly. When the invention
involves a biological material,
sometimes words alone cannot
sufficiently describe how to make and
use the invention in a reproducible or
repeatable manner. In such cases, the
required biological material must be
both known and readily available
(neither condition alone is sufficient) or
be deposited in a suitable depository
that has been recognized as an
International Depository Authority
(IDA) established under the Budapest
Treaty, or a depository recognized by
the USPTO to meet the requirements of
35 U.S.C. 112.
In cases where a deposit is necessary,
it must be made under conditions that
assure access to those entitled thereto
under 37 CFR 1.14 and 35 U.S.C. § 122
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
6349
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2010 / Notices
and upon issuance as a patent that all
restriction to public access permanently
removed.
In order to meet and satisfy
requirements for international
patenting, all countries signing the
Budapest Treaty must recognize the
deposit of biological material with any
International Depository Authority
(IDA).
II. Method of Collection
By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to
the USPTO when the applicant or agent
files a patent application with the
USPTO or submits subsequent papers
during the prosecution of the
application to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 3,505 hours per year.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $106,625 per year to
submit the information to the USPTO.
Using the professional hourly rate of
$30 for a senior administrative assistant,
the USPTO estimates $105,000 per year
for salary costs associated with
collecting and submitting the necessary
deposit information. Using the
professional hourly rate of $325 for
attorneys in private firms, the USPTO
estimates $1,625 per year in respondent
cost burden associated with the average
depository seeking approval to store
biological material.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0022.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profits.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
3,500 responses per year for deposited
materials and 1 response per year for
depository approval.
Estimated Time Per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
public approximately 1 to 5 hours,
depending upon the complexity of the
situation, to gather, prepare, and submit
the various documents in this
information collection.
Estimated time
for response
(hours)
Item
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated annual burden
hours
1
5
3,500
1
3,500
5
Total ......................................................................................................................................
Cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Deposited Materials .....................................................................................................................
Depository Approval ....................................................................................................................
........................
3,501
3,505
Estimated Total Annual (non-hour)
Respondent Cost Burden: $9,831,120.
There are no maintenance or record
keeping costs or filing fees associated
with this information collection. There
are, however, capital start-up and
mailing costs.
Depositories charge fees to depositors;
all depositories charge about the same
rates for their services. For example, the
American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC), one of the world’s leading
biological supply houses and recognized
patent depositories, offers
comprehensive patent services for
$2,500 per deposit. Most deposits
received from outside the United States
require an import permit from the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) as
well as a Public Health Service (PHS)
permit, available from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
for importation of agents infectious to
humans. There is no extra charge for
this permit application processing. The
USPTO estimates that the total non-hour
respondent cost burden in the form of
capital start-up costs amounts to
$8,750,000.
In addition, this collection does have
mailing costs. Biological deposits are
generally shipped to the depository
‘‘Domestic Overnight’’ by Federal
Express (FedEx) and, since depositors
are urged to supply frozen or freezedried material, it must be packed in dry
ice according to a representative from
the Patent Department at ATCC. Dry Ice
itself is considered dangerous goods and
requires special packaging. Additional
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:39 Feb 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
FedEx special handling charges for
inaccessible dangerous goods shipments
of $32.50 per shipment apply for
temperature-sensitive biological
materials and also for the dry ice. An
average cost for shipping by FedEx
‘‘Domestic Overnight’’ is estimated to be
$75. If the shipment requires pick-up by
FedEx, there is an additional charge of
$2.20. Special packaging is also required
for these shipments. According to DG
Supplies Inc., a supplier of infectious
and diagnostic goods packaging, the
average cost of frozen infectious
shippers is estimated to be $199.19 per
package of four for specimen shipments
requiring refrigeration or dry ice.
Therefore, postage costs average $308.89
per shipment, for a cost to respondents
of $1,081,115 ($308.89 × 3,500).
The postage cost for a depository
seeking recognition is estimated to be
$4.80, sent to the USPTO by priority
mail through the United States Postal
Service. Since the USPTO estimates that
it receives one request for recognition
from a depository every four years, the
postage cost averages $4.80 per
depository request, for a rounded cost to
respondents of $5.00.
The USPTO estimates that the (nonhour) respondent cost burden in the
form of mailing costs amounts to
$1,081,120 ($1,081,115 + $5).
Therefore, the USPTO estimates that
the total (non-hour) respondent cost
burden for this collection in the form of
capital start-up costs ($8,750,000) and
mailing costs ($1,081,120) is $9,831,120.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden (including hours
and cost) of the proposed collection of
information;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they will also become a matter of public
record.
Dated: February 2, 2010.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–2764 Filed 2–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6348-6349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2764]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Deposit of Biological Materials
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on this continuing information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-0022
Deposit of Biological Materials comment'' in the subject line of the
message.
Fax: 571-273-0112, marked to the attention of Susan K.
Fawcett.
Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to the attention of Brian Hanlon, Director, Office
of Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by telephone at 571-
272-5047; or by e-mail at Brian.Hanlon@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The deposit of biological materials as part of a patent application
is required by 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2) and outlined in 37 CFR Ch. 1, Subpart
G, 1.801-1.809. Every patent must contain a description of the
invention sufficient to enable a person (knowledgeable in the relevant
science), to make and use the invention as specified by 35 U.S.C. 112.
The term biological includes material that is capable of self-
replication either directly or indirectly. When the invention involves
a biological material, sometimes words alone cannot sufficiently
describe how to make and use the invention in a reproducible or
repeatable manner. In such cases, the required biological material must
be both known and readily available (neither condition alone is
sufficient) or be deposited in a suitable depository that has been
recognized as an International Depository Authority (IDA) established
under the Budapest Treaty, or a depository recognized by the USPTO to
meet the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112.
In cases where a deposit is necessary, it must be made under
conditions that assure access to those entitled thereto under 37 CFR
1.14 and 35 U.S.C. Sec. 122
[[Page 6349]]
and upon issuance as a patent that all restriction to public access
permanently removed.
In order to meet and satisfy requirements for international
patenting, all countries signing the Budapest Treaty must recognize the
deposit of biological material with any International Depository
Authority (IDA).
II. Method of Collection
By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery to the USPTO when the
applicant or agent files a patent application with the USPTO or submits
subsequent papers during the prosecution of the application to the
USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0022.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profits.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 3,500 responses per year for
deposited materials and 1 response per year for depository approval.
Estimated Time Per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take
the public approximately 1 to 5 hours, depending upon the complexity of
the situation, to gather, prepare, and submit the various documents in
this information collection.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 3,505 hours per
year.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $106,625 per year to
submit the information to the USPTO. Using the professional hourly rate
of $30 for a senior administrative assistant, the USPTO estimates
$105,000 per year for salary costs associated with collecting and
submitting the necessary deposit information. Using the professional
hourly rate of $325 for attorneys in private firms, the USPTO estimates
$1,625 per year in respondent cost burden associated with the average
depository seeking approval to store biological material.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated time Estimated Estimated
Item for response annual annual burden
(hours) responses hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deposited Materials............................................. 1 3,500 3,500
Depository Approval............................................. 5 1 5
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... .............. 3,501 3,505
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual (non-hour) Respondent Cost Burden:
$9,831,120. There are no maintenance or record keeping costs or filing
fees associated with this information collection. There are, however,
capital start-up and mailing costs.
Depositories charge fees to depositors; all depositories charge
about the same rates for their services. For example, the American Type
Culture Collection (ATCC), one of the world's leading biological supply
houses and recognized patent depositories, offers comprehensive patent
services for $2,500 per deposit. Most deposits received from outside
the United States require an import permit from the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) as well as a Public Health Service (PHS) permit,
available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
for importation of agents infectious to humans. There is no extra
charge for this permit application processing. The USPTO estimates that
the total non-hour respondent cost burden in the form of capital start-
up costs amounts to $8,750,000.
In addition, this collection does have mailing costs. Biological
deposits are generally shipped to the depository ``Domestic Overnight''
by Federal Express (FedEx) and, since depositors are urged to supply
frozen or freeze-dried material, it must be packed in dry ice according
to a representative from the Patent Department at ATCC. Dry Ice itself
is considered dangerous goods and requires special packaging.
Additional FedEx special handling charges for inaccessible dangerous
goods shipments of $32.50 per shipment apply for temperature-sensitive
biological materials and also for the dry ice. An average cost for
shipping by FedEx ``Domestic Overnight'' is estimated to be $75. If the
shipment requires pick-up by FedEx, there is an additional charge of
$2.20. Special packaging is also required for these shipments.
According to DG Supplies Inc., a supplier of infectious and diagnostic
goods packaging, the average cost of frozen infectious shippers is
estimated to be $199.19 per package of four for specimen shipments
requiring refrigeration or dry ice. Therefore, postage costs average
$308.89 per shipment, for a cost to respondents of $1,081,115 ($308.89
x 3,500).
The postage cost for a depository seeking recognition is estimated
to be $4.80, sent to the USPTO by priority mail through the United
States Postal Service. Since the USPTO estimates that it receives one
request for recognition from a depository every four years, the postage
cost averages $4.80 per depository request, for a rounded cost to
respondents of $5.00.
The USPTO estimates that the (non-hour) respondent cost burden in
the form of mailing costs amounts to $1,081,120 ($1,081,115 + $5).
Therefore, the USPTO estimates that the total (non-hour) respondent
cost burden for this collection in the form of capital start-up costs
($8,750,000) and mailing costs ($1,081,120) is $9,831,120.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility;
(b) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden (including
hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they will also become a matter of public record.
Dated: February 2, 2010.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-2764 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P