Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement on the Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic Ocean, 6175-6177 [2010-2681]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 25 / Monday, February 8, 2010 / Notices
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dhynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to Brian Harris-Kojetin, OMB
Desk Officer either by fax (202–395–
7245) or e-mail (bharrisk@omb.eop.gov).
Dated: February 2, 2010.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–2658 Filed 2–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XU06
Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement on
the Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in
the Arctic Ocean
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement;
request for comments.
SUMMARY: The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces its
intent to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) to analyze the
environmental impacts of issuing
Incidental Take Authorizations (ITAs)
pursuant to the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA) to the oil and
gas industry for the taking of marine
mammals incidental to offshore
exploration activities (e.g., seismic
surveys and exploratory drilling) in
Federal and state waters of the U.S.
Chukchi and Beaufort Seas off Alaska.
DATES: All comments, written
statements, and questions regarding the
scoping process and preparation of the
EIS must be received no later than April
9, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
statements should be addressed to Mr.
P. Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring,
MD 20190–3225. The mailbox address
for providing e-mail comments is
arcticeis.comments@noaa.gov.
Comments sent via e-mail, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10–
megabyte file size. Comments and
statements may also be submitted via
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:51 Feb 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
fax to (301) 713–0376. Information on
this project can also be found on the
Protected Resources webpage at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/eis/
arctic.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Payne, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713–2289 ext.
110.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101 (a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 USC 1361 et seq.) direct the
Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon
request, the incidental, but not
intentional taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review. The term ‘‘take’’ under the
MMPA means ‘‘to harass, hunt, capture,
kill or collect, or attempt to harass,
hunt, capture, kill or collect.’’ Except
with respect to certain activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as ‘‘any act of pursuit,
torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level
A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns,
including, but not limited to, migration,
breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering [Level B harassment].’’
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses (where relevant), and if
the permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ’’...an impact resulting from
the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Summary of Previous National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Documents
In 2006, the U.S. Minerals
Management Service (MMS) prepared a
Programmatic Environmental
Assessment (PEA) for the 2006 Arctic
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6175
Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) seismic
surveys. NMFS was a cooperating
agency and adopted the Final PEA on
June 28, 2006. Under this PEA, NMFS
issued Incidental Harassment
Authorizations under Section
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA to oil and gas
companies for the taking of marine
mammals incidental to seismic surveys
in 2006. This PEA analyzed the effects
of four concurrent seismic surveys in
the Beaufort Sea and four concurrent
seismic surveys in the Chukchi Sea. At
that time, NMFS indicated that
increased activity and new available
science would result in a need to
prepare an EIS for future authorizations.
On April 6, 2007, NMFS and MMS
published a Notice of Availability for a
Draft Programmatic EIS (DPEIS) and a
schedule of public hearings (72 FR
17117) to assess the impacts of MMS’
issuance of permits and authorizations
under the Outer Continental Shelf
Lands Act (OCSLA) for the conduct of
seismic surveys in the Chukchi and
Beaufort Seas off Alaska and NMFS’
authorizations under the MMPA to
incidentally harass marine mammals
while conducting those surveys. The
proposed scope and effects of the
seismic survey activities analyzed in the
DPEIS were based on the best available
information at the time. Since then, new
information (e.g., scientific study
results, changes in projections of level
of activity) has become available that
alters the scope, range of possible
alternatives, and analyses in the DPEIS.
Therefore, MMS and NMFS filed a
Notice of Withdrawal of the DPEIS on
October 28, 2009 (74 FR 55539) and
announced our decision to begin a new
NEPA process.
Objectives of the EIS
This NOI announces NMFS’ intent, as
lead agency, to prepare a new EIS to
analyze the potential effects of both
geophysical surveys and exploratory
drilling, address cumulative effects over
a longer time frame, consider a more
reasonable range of alternatives
consistent with our statutory mandates,
and reanalyze the range of practicable
mitigation and monitoring measures for
protecting marine mammals and
availability of marine mammals for
subsistence uses. MMS will be a
cooperating agency on this EIS.
Specifically, this EIS would:
(1) Assess the environmental impacts
to the physical, biological, cultural,
economic, and social resources from
deep-penetration, two-dimensional (2D)
and three-dimensional (3D) streamer
and ocean bottom cable surveys
(hereafter referred to as seismic surveys)
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
6176
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 25 / Monday, February 8, 2010 / Notices
and shallow hazard and site clearance
surveys;
(2) Assess the environmental impacts
to the physical, biological, cultural,
economic, and social resources from
open water offshore exploratory drilling
operations during the open water season
in order for the industry to drill priority
exploration drill sites on MMS OCS
leases in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas.
Also, as part of this EIS, NMFS will
analyze the effects of obtaining
geotechnical data for pre-feasibility
analyses of shallow sub-sea sediments
as part of its proposed exploratory
drilling operations; and
(3) Assess whether alternatives
developed would allow for the
implementation of a long-term planning
process pursuant to section 101(a)(5)(A)
of the MMPA through the development
and implementation of regulations that
would be in place for 5 year time
periods.
For the purposes of complying with
NEPA and to achieve greater
administrative efficiency in its ITA
program, NMFS has determined the
need to prepare an EIS that will analyze
a range of oil and gas exploratory
actions and that will satisfy the
requirements of the Council on
Environmental Quality’s NEPA
regulations and the NOAA NEPA
administrative order 216–6. The
proposed EIS would cover known and
reasonably foreseeable projects
requiring ITAs in the U.S. Arctic regions
for future years, until such time that a
revision of the document is necessary.
NMFS has determined, based on the
following factors, that an EIS would
serve a more beneficial use in terms of
agency decisionmaking and would
allow greater public participation in
future decisions related to ITAs for the
oil and gas industry:
• NMFS and MMS have received
preliminary information from industry
that suggests an additional increase in
seismic survey applications beyond
recent levels;
• NMFS has received applications for
exploratory drilling and expects more in
the future, the effects of which were not
analyzed in the withdrawn DPEIS;
• Understanding that both drilling
and seismic activities could be expected
to continue in the immediate years, both
agencies determined that a longer
timeframe needed to be analyzed in
order to most effectively and fully
evaluate the potential for cumulative
impacts; and
• NMFS prepares environmental
analyses under NEPA to support the
issuance of ITAs under sections
101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA.
Therefore, this EIS will also be used to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:51 Feb 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
support future MMPA authorizations
issued by NMFS for seismic and
exploratory drilling activities in state
and Federal waters in the U.S. Arctic
Ocean in the Beaufort and Chukchi
Seas.
Finally, the environmental analysis
will assist NMFS and MMS in carrying
out other statutory responsibilities
relating to the agencies’ role in
authorizing seismic survey and
exploratory drilling activities or
incidental take of marine mammals (e.g.,
assessing environmental impacts on
listed species under the Endangered
Species Act [Section 7 consultation] and
effects of the proposed action on
essential fish habitat [EFH] under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
[EFH consultation]).
Overview of Proposed Activities
Seismic Activities
This EIS would analyze effects of
seismic activities during the open water
season in the Beaufort and Chukchi
Seas. Seismic surveys are conducted to
obtain data on geological formations
from the sediment near-surface to
several thousand meters deep (below
the sediment surface). This information
enables industry to accurately assess
potential hydrocarbon reservoirs, helps
to optimally locate exploration and
development wells, maximizing
extraction and production from a
reservoir, and to locate shallow geologic
hazards. It also allows MMS to fulfill its
statutory responsibilities to ensure safe
operations, support environmental
impact analyses, protect benthic
resources through avoidance measures,
and perform other statutory
responsibilities.
Seismic surveys are most often
characterized by the type of data being
collected. Seismic surveys may be
described in very general terms by when
the surveys occur (pre-lease, post-lease)
because the timing can indicate the type
of data likely to be collected. Surveys
may be described by the acoustic sound
source (air gun, water gun, sparker,
pinger, etc.) or by the purpose for which
the data is being collected (speculative
shoot, exclusive shoot, site clearance).
Each seismic vessel may be
accompanied by other support vessels
for provision re-supply and crew
change. In addition, fixed-wing aircraft
may be used for marine mammal
surveillance over-flights.
Drilling Activities
This EIS would also analyze effects of
offshore exploratory drilling operations
during the open water season in order
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that oil companies can drill exploration
targets on their OCS leases in the
Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. Also, as part
of this EIS, NMFS would analyze the
effects of obtaining geotechnical data for
pre-feasibility analyses of shallow subsea sediments as part of its proposed
exploratory drilling operations by
drilling a series of boreholes, each up to
400 feet (122 m) in depth.
Each drilling vessel is typically
accompanied by up to two Arctic class
ice management vessels which also
serve duty as anchor tenders and other
drill ship support tasks, as well as
additional support vessels, oil spill
response vessels, and aircraft.
Additional support vessels will be used
for provision re-supply and crew
change. In addition, fixed-wing aircraft
may be used for marine mammal
surveillance over-flights, as well as for
activities such as crew change and
provision re-supply.
Scoping
Publication of this notice begins the
official scoping period that will help
clarify previously identified issues of
concern and determine the range and
structure of alternatives to be
considered in the EIS. NMFS invites
comments and input from the public,
organizations and interest groups, local
governments, and Federal and state
agencies on issues surrounding the
proposal. The scoping period will end
on April 9, 2010; for consideration in
the development of the EIS, all written
statements and questions must be
received by this date, via contact means
identified above (see ADDRESSES).
NMFS will consider all comments
received during the scoping period. All
hardcopy submissions must be unbound
and suitable for copying and electronic
scanning. Comments sent via e-mail,
including all attachments, must not
exceed a 10–megabyte file size. NMFS
requests that you include in your
comments:
(1) Your name and address;
(2) Whether or not you would like a
copy of the Draft EIS; and
(3) Any background documents to
support your comments as you feel
necessary.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record. All
Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
This notice requests public
participation in the scoping process,
provides information on how to
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 25 / Monday, February 8, 2010 / Notices
participate, and identifies a set of
preliminary alternatives to serve as a
starting point for discussions. The
public will have additional
opportunities to comment on the Draft
EIS and any applications received under
the MMPA as part of this action. In
particular, NMFS is soliciting
information on:
(1) Effects of oil and gas exploration
on marine mammal behavior and use of
habitat;
(2) Effects of oil and gas exploration
on availability of species for subsistence
uses;
(3) Available new science on the
Arctic ecosystem; and
(4) Available new technology for
monitoring or obtaining seismic/drilling
data.
The scoping comments will help
inform NMFS’ formulation of a range of
reasonable alternatives considered in
the EIS. The scope and structure of the
alternatives evaluated will reflect the
combined input from the public,
industry, stakeholders, affected state
and Federal agencies, and NMFS
administrative and research offices. The
range of reasonable alternatives that are
analyzed in this EIS will be determined
based on information gathered during
scoping and will be consistent with the
purpose and need of NMFS’ and MMS’
actions and with applicable law.
Issues and concerns associated with
oil and gas related activities in the
Arctic marine environment have been
documented by the scientific
community, government publications, at
scientific symposia, through the scoping
and public hearings/comments, and
other NEPA analyses. In addition,
public testimony and traditional
knowledge from Alaskan Natives have
provided valuable information about the
potential impacts to marine mammals
and on subsistence hunting of such
species from seismic surveying and
drilling operations. Based on
information from these sources, the
following prominent issues and
concerns on which NMFS is seeking
public comments have been identified
and will be included in an alternatives
framework and analysis of effects:
• Protection of subsistence resources
and Inupiat culture and way of life
• Disturbance to bowhead whale
migration patterns
• Impacts of seismic operations on
marine fish reproduction, growth, and
development
• Harassment and potential harm of
wildlife, including marine mammals
and marine birds, by vessel operations,
movements, and noise
• Impacts on water quality
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:51 Feb 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Changes in the socioeconomic
environment
• Impacts to threatened and
endangered species
• Impacts to marine mammals,
including disturbance and changes in
behavior
• Incorporation of traditional
knowledge in the decision-making
process
• Effectiveness and feasibility of
marine mammal monitoring and other
mitigation and monitoring measures
To provide a framework for public
comments, the range of reasonable
alternatives will include the Proposed
Action and several other action
alternatives, as well as a No Action
alternative. The action alternatives
analyzed will represent a range of levels
of activities from unrestricted to no
seismic or exploratory drilling and
could address the following, although
this list is not exhaustive:
Levels of Activity
• Number, scale/size, location, and
duration of seismic activities
• Number, scale/size, location, and
duration of drilling activities
• Number, scale/size, location, and
duration of shallow hazard/site
clearance activities
• Number, scale/size, location, and
duration of associated support activities
(vessel, aircraft, shore)
• The degree to which those activities
can overlap in space and time
Mitigation
• Exclusion zones based on received
levels of sounds;
• Exclusion zones based on presence
of specific biological factors in
combination with received levels of
sound;
• Exclusion zones based on presence
and timing of subsistence activities;
• Time/area closures for biological
and subsistence reasons; and
• Limitations on certain combinations
of activities in specific temporal/spatial
circumstances.
The EIS will assess the direct and
indirect effects of the alternative
approaches to authorizing oil and gas
seismic surveys under the OCSLA and
the taking of marine mammals
incidental to seismic surveys and
exploratory drilling activities under the
MMPA. The EIS will assess the effects
on the marine mammal species and
availability of those species for
subsistence uses, as well as other
components of the marine ecosystem
and human environment. The EIS will
assess the contribution of these
activities to the cumulative effects on
these resources, including effects from
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
6177
past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable future events and activities
in the U.S. Arctic. Anyone having
relevant information they believe NMFS
should consider in its analysis should
provide a description of that
information along with complete
citations for supporting documents.
For additional information on the
withdrawn MMS and NMFS 2007
DPEIS, please visit the MMS website at:
https://www.mms.gov/alaska/ref/
EIS%20EA/draftlarcticlpeis/
draftlpeis.htm.
Scoping Meetings Agenda
Public scoping meetings will be held
at the following locations in February
and March, 2010: Anchorage, Barrow,
Kaktovik, Kotzebue, Nuiqsut, Point
Hope, Point Lay, and Wainwright.
Public scoping meetings will be held at
the following dates, times, and
locations:
(1) February 18, 2010, 6 – 8 p.m.,
Northwest Arctic Borough Assembly
Chambers, Kotzebue, Alaska;
(2) February 19, 2010, 5 – 7 p.m.,
Point Hope Community Center, Point
Hope, Alaska; and
(3) February 22, 2010, 7 – 9 p.m.,
Point Lay Community Center, Point Lay,
Alaska.
The final dates, times, and locations
are not yet finalized for the public
scoping meetings in Anchorage, Barrow,
Kaktovik, Nuiqsut, and Wainwright; a
supplement to this NOI will be
published with the final meeting dates,
times, and locations. Comments will be
accepted at all public scoping meetings,
as well as during the scoping period and
can be submitted via the methods
described earlier in this document (see
ADDRESSES).
Special Accommodations
These meetings are accessible to
people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or auxiliary
aids should be directed to Sheyna
Wisdom by telephone at (907) 261–6705
or by email at
SheynalWisdom@URSCorp.com at
least 7 days before the scheduled
meeting date.
Dated: February 2, 2010.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–2681 Filed 2–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 25 (Monday, February 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6175-6177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2681]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XU06
Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement on
the Effects of Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic Ocean
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement;
request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces its
intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to analyze
the environmental impacts of issuing Incidental Take Authorizations
(ITAs) pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) to the oil
and gas industry for the taking of marine mammals incidental to
offshore exploration activities (e.g., seismic surveys and exploratory
drilling) in Federal and state waters of the U.S. Chukchi and Beaufort
Seas off Alaska.
DATES: All comments, written statements, and questions regarding the
scoping process and preparation of the EIS must be received no later
than April 9, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and statements should be addressed to Mr.
P. Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20190-3225. The mailbox address for providing e-mail
comments is arcticeis.comments@noaa.gov. Comments sent via e-mail,
including all attachments, must not exceed a 10-megabyte file size.
Comments and statements may also be submitted via fax to (301) 713-
0376. Information on this project can also be found on the Protected
Resources webpage at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/eis/arctic.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Payne, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2289 ext. 110.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101 (a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 USC 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review. The term ``take'' under the MMPA
means ``to harass, hunt, capture, kill or collect, or attempt to
harass, hunt, capture, kill or collect.'' Except with respect to
certain activities not pertinent here, the MMPA defines ``harassment''
as ``any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of
behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration,
breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering [Level B
harassment].''
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103
as ''...an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.''
Summary of Previous National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents
In 2006, the U.S. Minerals Management Service (MMS) prepared a
Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) for the 2006 Arctic Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) seismic surveys. NMFS was a cooperating agency
and adopted the Final PEA on June 28, 2006. Under this PEA, NMFS issued
Incidental Harassment Authorizations under Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the
MMPA to oil and gas companies for the taking of marine mammals
incidental to seismic surveys in 2006. This PEA analyzed the effects of
four concurrent seismic surveys in the Beaufort Sea and four concurrent
seismic surveys in the Chukchi Sea. At that time, NMFS indicated that
increased activity and new available science would result in a need to
prepare an EIS for future authorizations.
On April 6, 2007, NMFS and MMS published a Notice of Availability
for a Draft Programmatic EIS (DPEIS) and a schedule of public hearings
(72 FR 17117) to assess the impacts of MMS' issuance of permits and
authorizations under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) for
the conduct of seismic surveys in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas off
Alaska and NMFS' authorizations under the MMPA to incidentally harass
marine mammals while conducting those surveys. The proposed scope and
effects of the seismic survey activities analyzed in the DPEIS were
based on the best available information at the time. Since then, new
information (e.g., scientific study results, changes in projections of
level of activity) has become available that alters the scope, range of
possible alternatives, and analyses in the DPEIS. Therefore, MMS and
NMFS filed a Notice of Withdrawal of the DPEIS on October 28, 2009 (74
FR 55539) and announced our decision to begin a new NEPA process.
Objectives of the EIS
This NOI announces NMFS' intent, as lead agency, to prepare a new
EIS to analyze the potential effects of both geophysical surveys and
exploratory drilling, address cumulative effects over a longer time
frame, consider a more reasonable range of alternatives consistent with
our statutory mandates, and reanalyze the range of practicable
mitigation and monitoring measures for protecting marine mammals and
availability of marine mammals for subsistence uses. MMS will be a
cooperating agency on this EIS.
Specifically, this EIS would:
(1) Assess the environmental impacts to the physical, biological,
cultural, economic, and social resources from deep-penetration, two-
dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) streamer and ocean bottom
cable surveys (hereafter referred to as seismic surveys)
[[Page 6176]]
and shallow hazard and site clearance surveys;
(2) Assess the environmental impacts to the physical, biological,
cultural, economic, and social resources from open water offshore
exploratory drilling operations during the open water season in order
for the industry to drill priority exploration drill sites on MMS OCS
leases in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas. Also, as part of this EIS,
NMFS will analyze the effects of obtaining geotechnical data for pre-
feasibility analyses of shallow sub-sea sediments as part of its
proposed exploratory drilling operations; and
(3) Assess whether alternatives developed would allow for the
implementation of a long-term planning process pursuant to section
101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA through the development and implementation of
regulations that would be in place for 5 year time periods.
For the purposes of complying with NEPA and to achieve greater
administrative efficiency in its ITA program, NMFS has determined the
need to prepare an EIS that will analyze a range of oil and gas
exploratory actions and that will satisfy the requirements of the
Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA regulations and the NOAA NEPA
administrative order 216-6. The proposed EIS would cover known and
reasonably foreseeable projects requiring ITAs in the U.S. Arctic
regions for future years, until such time that a revision of the
document is necessary. NMFS has determined, based on the following
factors, that an EIS would serve a more beneficial use in terms of
agency decisionmaking and would allow greater public participation in
future decisions related to ITAs for the oil and gas industry:
NMFS and MMS have received preliminary information from
industry that suggests an additional increase in seismic survey
applications beyond recent levels;
NMFS has received applications for exploratory drilling
and expects more in the future, the effects of which were not analyzed
in the withdrawn DPEIS;
Understanding that both drilling and seismic activities
could be expected to continue in the immediate years, both agencies
determined that a longer timeframe needed to be analyzed in order to
most effectively and fully evaluate the potential for cumulative
impacts; and
NMFS prepares environmental analyses under NEPA to support
the issuance of ITAs under sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA.
Therefore, this EIS will also be used to support future MMPA
authorizations issued by NMFS for seismic and exploratory drilling
activities in state and Federal waters in the U.S. Arctic Ocean in the
Beaufort and Chukchi Seas.
Finally, the environmental analysis will assist NMFS and MMS in
carrying out other statutory responsibilities relating to the agencies'
role in authorizing seismic survey and exploratory drilling activities
or incidental take of marine mammals (e.g., assessing environmental
impacts on listed species under the Endangered Species Act [Section 7
consultation] and effects of the proposed action on essential fish
habitat [EFH] under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act [EFH consultation]).
Overview of Proposed Activities
Seismic Activities
This EIS would analyze effects of seismic activities during the
open water season in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. Seismic surveys are
conducted to obtain data on geological formations from the sediment
near-surface to several thousand meters deep (below the sediment
surface). This information enables industry to accurately assess
potential hydrocarbon reservoirs, helps to optimally locate exploration
and development wells, maximizing extraction and production from a
reservoir, and to locate shallow geologic hazards. It also allows MMS
to fulfill its statutory responsibilities to ensure safe operations,
support environmental impact analyses, protect benthic resources
through avoidance measures, and perform other statutory
responsibilities.
Seismic surveys are most often characterized by the type of data
being collected. Seismic surveys may be described in very general terms
by when the surveys occur (pre-lease, post-lease) because the timing
can indicate the type of data likely to be collected. Surveys may be
described by the acoustic sound source (air gun, water gun, sparker,
pinger, etc.) or by the purpose for which the data is being collected
(speculative shoot, exclusive shoot, site clearance).
Each seismic vessel may be accompanied by other support vessels for
provision re-supply and crew change. In addition, fixed-wing aircraft
may be used for marine mammal surveillance over-flights.
Drilling Activities
This EIS would also analyze effects of offshore exploratory
drilling operations during the open water season in order that oil
companies can drill exploration targets on their OCS leases in the
Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. Also, as part of this EIS, NMFS would
analyze the effects of obtaining geotechnical data for pre-feasibility
analyses of shallow sub-sea sediments as part of its proposed
exploratory drilling operations by drilling a series of boreholes, each
up to 400 feet (122 m) in depth.
Each drilling vessel is typically accompanied by up to two Arctic
class ice management vessels which also serve duty as anchor tenders
and other drill ship support tasks, as well as additional support
vessels, oil spill response vessels, and aircraft. Additional support
vessels will be used for provision re-supply and crew change. In
addition, fixed-wing aircraft may be used for marine mammal
surveillance over-flights, as well as for activities such as crew
change and provision re-supply.
Scoping
Publication of this notice begins the official scoping period that
will help clarify previously identified issues of concern and determine
the range and structure of alternatives to be considered in the EIS.
NMFS invites comments and input from the public, organizations and
interest groups, local governments, and Federal and state agencies on
issues surrounding the proposal. The scoping period will end on April
9, 2010; for consideration in the development of the EIS, all written
statements and questions must be received by this date, via contact
means identified above (see ADDRESSES).
NMFS will consider all comments received during the scoping period.
All hardcopy submissions must be unbound and suitable for copying and
electronic scanning. Comments sent via e-mail, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10-megabyte file size. NMFS requests
that you include in your comments:
(1) Your name and address;
(2) Whether or not you would like a copy of the Draft EIS; and
(3) Any background documents to support your comments as you feel
necessary.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public
record. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
This notice requests public participation in the scoping process,
provides information on how to
[[Page 6177]]
participate, and identifies a set of preliminary alternatives to serve
as a starting point for discussions. The public will have additional
opportunities to comment on the Draft EIS and any applications received
under the MMPA as part of this action. In particular, NMFS is
soliciting information on:
(1) Effects of oil and gas exploration on marine mammal behavior
and use of habitat;
(2) Effects of oil and gas exploration on availability of species
for subsistence uses;
(3) Available new science on the Arctic ecosystem; and
(4) Available new technology for monitoring or obtaining seismic/
drilling data.
The scoping comments will help inform NMFS' formulation of a range
of reasonable alternatives considered in the EIS. The scope and
structure of the alternatives evaluated will reflect the combined input
from the public, industry, stakeholders, affected state and Federal
agencies, and NMFS administrative and research offices. The range of
reasonable alternatives that are analyzed in this EIS will be
determined based on information gathered during scoping and will be
consistent with the purpose and need of NMFS' and MMS' actions and with
applicable law.
Issues and concerns associated with oil and gas related activities
in the Arctic marine environment have been documented by the scientific
community, government publications, at scientific symposia, through the
scoping and public hearings/comments, and other NEPA analyses. In
addition, public testimony and traditional knowledge from Alaskan
Natives have provided valuable information about the potential impacts
to marine mammals and on subsistence hunting of such species from
seismic surveying and drilling operations. Based on information from
these sources, the following prominent issues and concerns on which
NMFS is seeking public comments have been identified and will be
included in an alternatives framework and analysis of effects:
Protection of subsistence resources and Inupiat culture
and way of life
Disturbance to bowhead whale migration patterns
Impacts of seismic operations on marine fish reproduction,
growth, and development
Harassment and potential harm of wildlife, including
marine mammals and marine birds, by vessel operations, movements, and
noise
Impacts on water quality
Changes in the socioeconomic environment
Impacts to threatened and endangered species
Impacts to marine mammals, including disturbance and
changes in behavior
Incorporation of traditional knowledge in the decision-
making process
Effectiveness and feasibility of marine mammal monitoring
and other mitigation and monitoring measures
To provide a framework for public comments, the range of reasonable
alternatives will include the Proposed Action and several other action
alternatives, as well as a No Action alternative. The action
alternatives analyzed will represent a range of levels of activities
from unrestricted to no seismic or exploratory drilling and could
address the following, although this list is not exhaustive:
Levels of Activity
Number, scale/size, location, and duration of seismic
activities
Number, scale/size, location, and duration of drilling
activities
Number, scale/size, location, and duration of shallow
hazard/site clearance activities
Number, scale/size, location, and duration of associated
support activities (vessel, aircraft, shore)
The degree to which those activities can overlap in space
and time
Mitigation
Exclusion zones based on received levels of sounds;
Exclusion zones based on presence of specific biological
factors in combination with received levels of sound;
Exclusion zones based on presence and timing of
subsistence activities;
Time/area closures for biological and subsistence reasons;
and
Limitations on certain combinations of activities in
specific temporal/spatial circumstances.
The EIS will assess the direct and indirect effects of the
alternative approaches to authorizing oil and gas seismic surveys under
the OCSLA and the taking of marine mammals incidental to seismic
surveys and exploratory drilling activities under the MMPA. The EIS
will assess the effects on the marine mammal species and availability
of those species for subsistence uses, as well as other components of
the marine ecosystem and human environment. The EIS will assess the
contribution of these activities to the cumulative effects on these
resources, including effects from past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable future events and activities in the U.S. Arctic. Anyone
having relevant information they believe NMFS should consider in its
analysis should provide a description of that information along with
complete citations for supporting documents.
For additional information on the withdrawn MMS and NMFS 2007
DPEIS, please visit the MMS website at: https://www.mms.gov/alaska/ref/EIS%20EA/draft_arctic_peis/draft_peis.htm.
Scoping Meetings Agenda
Public scoping meetings will be held at the following locations in
February and March, 2010: Anchorage, Barrow, Kaktovik, Kotzebue,
Nuiqsut, Point Hope, Point Lay, and Wainwright. Public scoping meetings
will be held at the following dates, times, and locations:
(1) February 18, 2010, 6 - 8 p.m., Northwest Arctic Borough
Assembly Chambers, Kotzebue, Alaska;
(2) February 19, 2010, 5 - 7 p.m., Point Hope Community Center,
Point Hope, Alaska; and
(3) February 22, 2010, 7 - 9 p.m., Point Lay Community Center,
Point Lay, Alaska.
The final dates, times, and locations are not yet finalized for the
public scoping meetings in Anchorage, Barrow, Kaktovik, Nuiqsut, and
Wainwright; a supplement to this NOI will be published with the final
meeting dates, times, and locations. Comments will be accepted at all
public scoping meetings, as well as during the scoping period and can
be submitted via the methods described earlier in this document (see
ADDRESSES).
Special Accommodations
These meetings are accessible to people with disabilities. Requests
for sign language interpretation or auxiliary aids should be directed
to Sheyna Wisdom by telephone at (907) 261-6705 or by email at Sheyna_Wisdom@URSCorp.com at least 7 days before the scheduled meeting date.
Dated: February 2, 2010.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-2681 Filed 2-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S