Notice of a Project Waiver of Section 1605 (Buy American Requirement) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) to the City of LaSalle, IL (LaSalle), 6028-6030 [2010-2541]
Download as PDF
6028
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 24 / Friday, February 5, 2010 / Notices
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (703) 605–
0513; e-mail address:
casciano.gina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. This action may, however, be
of interest to those persons who are or
may be required to conduct testing of
chemical substances under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
or the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Since
other entities may also be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD-ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD-ROM the specific information that is
claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Feb 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to
achieve environmental justice, the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of any group, including minority and/or
low income populations, in the
development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. To help
address potential environmental justice
issues, the Agency seeks information on
any groups or segments of the
population who, as a result of their
location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or
disproportionately high and adverse
human health impacts or environmental
effects from exposure to the pesticide(s)
discussed in this document, compared
to the general population.
II. What Action is the Agency Taking?
Under section 5 of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C.
136c, EPA can allow manufacturers to
field test pesticides under development.
Manufacturers are required to obtain an
EUP before testing new pesticides or
new uses of pesticides if they conduct
experimental field tests on 10 acres or
more of land or one acre or more of
water.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 172.11(a), the
Agency has determined that the
following EUP application may be of
regional and national significance, and
therefore is seeking public comment on
the EUP application:
Submitter: Fine Agrochemicals Ltd.,
(62097–EUP–R).
Pesticide Chemical: Prohydrojasmon
(PDJ).
Summary of Request: Use as a plant
growth regulator on red apple varieties
in the states of California, Maryland,
Michigan, New York, North Carolina,
Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia,
Washington, and West Virginia.
A copy of the application and any
information submitted is available for
public review in the docket established
for this EUP application as described
under ADDRESSES.
Following the review of the
application and any comments and data
received in response to this solicitation,
EPA will decide whether to issue or
deny the EUP request, and if issued, the
conditions under which it is to be
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
conducted. Any issuance of an EUP will
be announced in the Federal Register.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection,
Experimental use permits.
Dated: January 25, 2010.
Keith A. Matthews,
Acting Director, Biopesticides and Pollution
Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010–2383 Filed 2–4–??; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9110–6]
Notice of a Project Waiver of Section
1605 (Buy American Requirement) of
the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) to
the City of LaSalle, IL (LaSalle)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The EPA is hereby granting a
project waiver of the Buy American
requirements of ARRA Section 1605
under the authority of Section
1605(b)(2) [manufactured goods are not
produced in the United States of a
satisfactory quality] to LaSalle for the
purchase of membrane bioreactor (MBR)
membrane racks, which include the
hollow fiber membrane modules and the
associated proprietary mechanical
equipment to secure the membranes in
the tank. This is a project-specific
waiver and only applies to the use of the
specified product for the ARRA funded
project being proposed. Any other
ARRA project that may wish to use the
same product must apply for a separate
waiver based on project-specific
circumstances. These hollow fiber
membrane racks, which are supplied by
Siemens Water Technologies
Corporation, are manufactured in
Australia and China, and meet LaSalle’s
performance specifications and
requirements. The Acting Regional
Administrator is making this
determination based on the review and
recommendations of EPA Region 5’s
Water Division. LaSalle has provided
sufficient documentation to support its
request, as detailed below. The
Assistant Administrator of the Office of
Administration and Resources
Management has concurred on this
decision to make an exception to
Section 1605 of ARRA. This action
permits the purchase of hollow fiber
membrane racks for LaSalle’s ‘‘East Side
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 24 / Friday, February 5, 2010 / Notices
Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility
Project’’ that may otherwise be
prohibited under Section 1605(a) of the
ARRA.
DATES: Effective Date: January 7, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
Henning, SRF Financial Analyst (312)
886–4882, or Puja Lakhani, Regional
Counsel, (312) 353–3190, U.S. EPA
Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago,
IL 60613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with ARRA Section 1605(c)
and pursuant to Section 1605(b)(2) of
Public Law 111–5, Buy American
requirements, EPA hereby provides
notice that it is granting a project waiver
to LaSalle for the acquisition of hollow
fiber membrane racks which are
manufactured in Australia and China.
The manufacturer is Siemens Water
Technologies Corporation.
Section 1605 of the ARRA requires
that none of the appropriated funds may
be used for the construction, alteration,
maintenance, or repair of a public
building or public work unless all of the
iron, steel, and manufactured goods
used in the project are produced in the
United States, or unless a waiver is
provided to the recipient by the head of
the appropriate agency, here EPA. A
waiver may be provided if EPA
determines that (1) Applying these
requirements would be inconsistent
with the public interest; (2) iron, steel,
and the relevant manufactured goods
are not produced in the United States in
sufficient and reasonably available
quantities and of a satisfactory quality;
or (3) inclusion of iron, steel, and the
relevant manufactured goods produced
in the United States will increase the
cost of the overall project by more than
25 percent.
LaSalle proposes to construct a new
0.50 million gallons per day (MGD)
wastewater treatment plant. The plant is
designed based upon membrane
bioreactor (MBR) technology. The MBR
technology will produce effluent which
has superior quality than conventional
secondary or tertiary treatment facilities.
The superior effluent quality afforded
by the MBR technology was necessary
for this project due to the characteristics
of the receiving stream, the Little
Vermilion River. The segment of the
Little Vermilion River into which the
proposed wastewater treatment plant
will discharge is on the list of impaired
waters set forth in Section 303(d) of the
Federal Clean Water Act and the Water
Quality Planning and Management
regulation at 40 CFR Part 130. The
segment has been listed with the
designated use of aquatic life as
impaired by potential pollutants
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Feb 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
including total nitrogen, pH, total
phosphorus, total suspended solids,
zinc and fecal coliform. The MBR
technology proved to be the costeffective alternative for achieving
effluent of sufficient quality with regard
to the pollutants that are the potential
source of impairment that would be
required in order to obtain a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit for a new discharge into
the 303(d)-listed receiving stream (Little
Vermilion River).
During the bidding phase of the
project, LaSalle received proposals from
three MBR equipment manufacturers, of
which Siemens Water Technologies
Corporation was selected. None of the
three equipment manufacturers
produces the hollow fiber membrane
rack components of the MBR systems
within the U.S. LaSalle stated in the
waiver application that based on
information gathered during the
planning and early design stages of the
project, including their contact with
contractors and equipment suppliers
during the bidding phase of the project,
to the best of their knowledge at the
time of equipment selection and design,
they could not identify any other
reputable membrane system for
wastewater treatment applications that
was currently manufactured in the
United States and available to meet
LaSalle’s technical specifications and
design requirements.
The April 28, 2009 EPA HQ
Memorandum, ‘‘Implementation of Buy
American provisions of P.L. 111–5, the
‘American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009’,’’ defines reasonably
available quantity as ‘‘the quantity of
iron, steel, or relevant manufactured
good is available or will be available at
the time needed and place needed, and
in the proper form or specification as
specified in the project plans and
design.’’
EPA’s national engineering contractor
prepared a technical assessment report
dated September 29, 2009, based on the
submitted waiver request, identifying
one potential domestic manufacturer of
membrane racks which appeared to
have the potential to meet LaSalle’s
performance criteria and specifications.
Subsequent analysis by EPA and the
national contractor, however, concluded
that the potential domestic
manufacturer only produces modules
with flat plate membranes. LaSalle’s
project design plans specify that hollow
fiber configured modules are required,
and discussions with both EPA’s
national engineering contractors and
LaSalle confirmed that the use of flat
plate membranes would require redesigning major portions of the project,
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6029
including the membrane bioreactor
basins, process inlet and outlet piping,
filtrate pumping system, recycle
pumping system, air scour blowers and
air piping system, chemical cleaning
system, and other features. The redesign would involve major changes to
the basin concrete structures, masonry
building enclosure, piping and
mechanical systems, electrical/controls
systems, and access platforms.
Therefore, the potential domestic
manufacturer does not provide the
required hollow fiber membrane racks
in sufficient and reasonably available
quantities and of a satisfactory quality to
meet the design specifications. EPA’s
national contractor’s technical
assessment report from September 29,
2009, did not find any additional
domestic manufacturers of the specified
manufactured good.
The purpose of the ARRA is to
stimulate economic recovery in part by
funding current infrastructure
construction, not to delay projects that
are ‘‘shovel ready’’ by requiring
communities such as Auburn to revise
their standards and specifications and to
start the bidding process again. The
imposition of ARRA Buy American
requirements on such projects otherwise
eligible for ARRA State Revolving Fund
assistance would result in unreasonable
delay and thus displace the ‘‘shovel
ready’’ status for this project. To further
delay project implementation is in
direct conflict with a fundamental
economic purpose of the ARRA, which
is to create or retain jobs.
The State and Tribal Programs Branch
has reviewed this waiver request and
has determined that the supporting
documentation provided by LaSalle is
sufficient to meet the criteria listed
under Section 1605(b) of the ARRA and
in the April 28, 2009, ‘‘Implementation
of Buy American provisions of Public
Law 111–5, the ‘American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009’
Memorandum’’: Iron, steel, and the
manufactured goods are not produced in
the United States in sufficient and
reasonably available quantities and of a
satisfactory quality. The basis for this
project waiver is the authorization
provided in Section 1605(b)(2) of the
ARRA. Due to the lack of production of
this product in the United States in
sufficient and reasonably available
quantities and of a satisfactory quality
in order to meet LaSalle’s performance
specifications and requirements, a
waiver from the Buy American
requirement is justified.
The March 31, 2009 Delegation of
Authority Memorandum provided
Regional Administrators with the
authority to issue exceptions to Section
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
6030
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 24 / Friday, February 5, 2010 / Notices
1605 of the ARRA within the geographic
boundaries of their respective regions
and with respect to requests by
individual grant recipients. Having
established both a proper basis to
specify the particular good required for
this project, and that this manufactured
good was not available from a producer
in the United States, LaSalle is hereby
granted a waiver from the Buy American
requirements of Section 1605(a) of
Public Law 111–5 for the purchase of
the MBR membrane racks using ARRA
funds as specified in the community’s
request of September 10, 2009. This
supplementary information constitutes
the detailed written justification
required by Section 1605(c) for waivers
‘‘based on a finding under subsection
(b).’’
Authority: Pub. L. 111–5, section 1605.
Dated: January 7, 2010.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2010–2541 Filed 2–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9110–9]
EPA Science Advisory Board Staff
Office Request for Nominations of
Experts for the SAB Lead (Pb) Review
Panel
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice; Request for
Nominations.
SUMMARY: The Science Advisory Board
(SAB) Staff Office is requesting public
nominations of experts to form an SAB
Ad Hoc Panel to review EPA’s draft
technical analyses which will be used to
support the development of lead-based
paint dust hazard standards and leadsafe work practice standards.
DATES: Nominations should be
submitted by February 26, 2010 per
instructions below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any
member of the public wishing further
information regarding this Request for
Nominations may contact Mr. Aaron
Yeow, Designated Federal Officer
(DFO), SAB Staff Office, by telephone/
voice mail at (202) 343–9878; by fax at
(202) 233–0643; or via e-mail at
yeow.aaron@epa.gov. General
information concerning the EPA Science
Advisory Board can be found on the
EPA SAB Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/sab.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:26 Feb 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
Background: Human exposure to lead
may cause a variety of adverse health
effects, particularly in children. EPA’s
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics (OPPT) regulates toxic
substances, such as lead, through the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
In 2001, EPA established standards for
lead-based paint hazards, which include
lead in residential dust. OPPT is
developing draft technical analyses that
will be used to support: (a) Possible
revision of existing residential leadbased paint dust hazard standards, (b)
the development of new lead-based
paint dust hazard standards for public
and commercial buildings, and (c) the
development of lead-safe work practice
standards for renovations of public and
commercial buildings. OPPT has
requested that the SAB conduct a
review of these draft technical analyses.
The SAB was established by 42 U.S.C.
4365 to provide independent scientific
and technical advice, consultation and
recommendations to the EPA
Administrator on the technical basis for
Agency positions and regulations. The
SAB Staff Office will form an expert
Panel to review OPPT’s draft technical
analyses. The SAB Panel will comply
with the provisions of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and all
appropriate SAB procedural policies.
Upon completion, the Panel’s report
will be submitted to the chartered SAB
for final approval for transmittal to the
EPA Administrator. The SAB Lead
Review Panel is being asked to comment
on the scientific soundness of the
Agency’s draft technical analyses.
Availability of the Review Materials:
The EPA draft technical analyses to be
reviewed by the SAB Panel will be
made available on the SAB Web site.
For questions concerning the review
materials, please contact Dr. Jennifer
Seed, at (202) 564–7634, or
seed.jennifer@epa.gov.
Request for Nominations: The SAB
Staff Office is requesting nominations of
nationally recognized experts with
expertise in one or more of the
following areas, particularly with
respect to lead: dust transport, exposure
assessment, epidemiology, general
toxicology, neurotoxicology, pediatrics,
biokinetic modeling, biostatistics, and
risk assessment.
Process and Deadline for Submitting
Nominations: Any interested person or
organization may nominate qualified
individuals for possible service on the
SAB Review Panel in the areas of
expertise described above. Nominations
should be submitted in electronic
format (which is preferred over hard
copy) following the instructions for
‘‘Nominating Experts to Advisory Panels
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and Ad Hoc Committees Being Formed’’
provided on the SAB Web site. The
instructions can be accessed through the
‘‘Nomination of Experts’’ link on the
blue navigational bar on the SAB Web
site at https://www.epa.gov/sab. To
receive full consideration, nominations
should include all of the information
requested.
EPA’s SAB Staff Office requests:
Contact information about the person
making the nomination; contact
information about the nominee; the
disciplinary and specific areas of
expertise of the nominee; the nominee’s
curriculum vitae; sources of recent
grants and/or contracts; and a
biographical sketch of the nominee
indicating current position, educational
background, research activities, and
recent service on other national
advisory committees or national
professional organizations.
Persons having questions about the
nomination procedures, or who are
unable to submit nominations through
the SAB Web site, should contact Mr.
Aaron Yeow, DFO, as indicated above in
this notice. Nominations should be
submitted in time to arrive no later than
February 26, 2010. EPA values and
welcomes diversity. In an effort to
obtain nominations of diverse
candidates, EPA encourages
nominations of women and men of all
racial and ethnic groups.
The EPA SAB Staff Office will
acknowledge receipt of nominations.
The names and biosketches of qualified
nominees identified by respondents to
the Federal Register notice and
additional experts identified by the SAB
Staff will be posted on the SAB Web site
at https://www.epa.gov/sab. Public
comments on this list of candidates will
be accepted for 21 calendar days. The
public will be requested to provide
relevant information or other
documentation on nominees that the
SAB Staff Office should consider in
evaluating candidates.
For the EPA SAB Staff Office, a
balanced subcommittee or review panel
includes candidates who possess the
necessary domains of knowledge, the
relevant scientific perspectives (which,
among other factors, can be influenced
by work history and affiliation), and the
collective breadth of experience to
adequately address the charge. In
establishing the SAB Panel, the SAB
Staff Office will consider public
comments on the list of candidates,
information provided by the candidates
themselves, and background
information independently gathered by
the SAB Staff Office. Selection criteria
to be used for Panel membership
include: (a) Scientific and/or technical
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6028-6030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2541]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9110-6]
Notice of a Project Waiver of Section 1605 (Buy American
Requirement) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(ARRA) to the City of LaSalle, IL (LaSalle)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is hereby granting a project waiver of the Buy
American requirements of ARRA Section 1605 under the authority of
Section 1605(b)(2) [manufactured goods are not produced in the United
States of a satisfactory quality] to LaSalle for the purchase of
membrane bioreactor (MBR) membrane racks, which include the hollow
fiber membrane modules and the associated proprietary mechanical
equipment to secure the membranes in the tank. This is a project-
specific waiver and only applies to the use of the specified product
for the ARRA funded project being proposed. Any other ARRA project that
may wish to use the same product must apply for a separate waiver based
on project-specific circumstances. These hollow fiber membrane racks,
which are supplied by Siemens Water Technologies Corporation, are
manufactured in Australia and China, and meet LaSalle's performance
specifications and requirements. The Acting Regional Administrator is
making this determination based on the review and recommendations of
EPA Region 5's Water Division. LaSalle has provided sufficient
documentation to support its request, as detailed below. The Assistant
Administrator of the Office of Administration and Resources Management
has concurred on this decision to make an exception to Section 1605 of
ARRA. This action permits the purchase of hollow fiber membrane racks
for LaSalle's ``East Side
[[Page 6029]]
Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Project'' that may otherwise be
prohibited under Section 1605(a) of the ARRA.
DATES: Effective Date: January 7, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Henning, SRF Financial Analyst
(312) 886-4882, or Puja Lakhani, Regional Counsel, (312) 353-3190, U.S.
EPA Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with ARRA Section 1605(c) and
pursuant to Section 1605(b)(2) of Public Law 111-5, Buy American
requirements, EPA hereby provides notice that it is granting a project
waiver to LaSalle for the acquisition of hollow fiber membrane racks
which are manufactured in Australia and China. The manufacturer is
Siemens Water Technologies Corporation.
Section 1605 of the ARRA requires that none of the appropriated
funds may be used for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or
repair of a public building or public work unless all of the iron,
steel, and manufactured goods used in the project are produced in the
United States, or unless a waiver is provided to the recipient by the
head of the appropriate agency, here EPA. A waiver may be provided if
EPA determines that (1) Applying these requirements would be
inconsistent with the public interest; (2) iron, steel, and the
relevant manufactured goods are not produced in the United States in
sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory
quality; or (3) inclusion of iron, steel, and the relevant manufactured
goods produced in the United States will increase the cost of the
overall project by more than 25 percent.
LaSalle proposes to construct a new 0.50 million gallons per day
(MGD) wastewater treatment plant. The plant is designed based upon
membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology. The MBR technology will produce
effluent which has superior quality than conventional secondary or
tertiary treatment facilities. The superior effluent quality afforded
by the MBR technology was necessary for this project due to the
characteristics of the receiving stream, the Little Vermilion River.
The segment of the Little Vermilion River into which the proposed
wastewater treatment plant will discharge is on the list of impaired
waters set forth in Section 303(d) of the Federal Clean Water Act and
the Water Quality Planning and Management regulation at 40 CFR Part
130. The segment has been listed with the designated use of aquatic
life as impaired by potential pollutants including total nitrogen, pH,
total phosphorus, total suspended solids, zinc and fecal coliform. The
MBR technology proved to be the cost-effective alternative for
achieving effluent of sufficient quality with regard to the pollutants
that are the potential source of impairment that would be required in
order to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit for a new discharge into the 303(d)-listed receiving
stream (Little Vermilion River).
During the bidding phase of the project, LaSalle received proposals
from three MBR equipment manufacturers, of which Siemens Water
Technologies Corporation was selected. None of the three equipment
manufacturers produces the hollow fiber membrane rack components of the
MBR systems within the U.S. LaSalle stated in the waiver application
that based on information gathered during the planning and early design
stages of the project, including their contact with contractors and
equipment suppliers during the bidding phase of the project, to the
best of their knowledge at the time of equipment selection and design,
they could not identify any other reputable membrane system for
wastewater treatment applications that was currently manufactured in
the United States and available to meet LaSalle's technical
specifications and design requirements.
The April 28, 2009 EPA HQ Memorandum, ``Implementation of Buy
American provisions of P.L. 111-5, the `American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009','' defines reasonably available quantity as
``the quantity of iron, steel, or relevant manufactured good is
available or will be available at the time needed and place needed, and
in the proper form or specification as specified in the project plans
and design.''
EPA's national engineering contractor prepared a technical
assessment report dated September 29, 2009, based on the submitted
waiver request, identifying one potential domestic manufacturer of
membrane racks which appeared to have the potential to meet LaSalle's
performance criteria and specifications. Subsequent analysis by EPA and
the national contractor, however, concluded that the potential domestic
manufacturer only produces modules with flat plate membranes. LaSalle's
project design plans specify that hollow fiber configured modules are
required, and discussions with both EPA's national engineering
contractors and LaSalle confirmed that the use of flat plate membranes
would require re-designing major portions of the project, including the
membrane bioreactor basins, process inlet and outlet piping, filtrate
pumping system, recycle pumping system, air scour blowers and air
piping system, chemical cleaning system, and other features. The re-
design would involve major changes to the basin concrete structures,
masonry building enclosure, piping and mechanical systems, electrical/
controls systems, and access platforms. Therefore, the potential
domestic manufacturer does not provide the required hollow fiber
membrane racks in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of
a satisfactory quality to meet the design specifications. EPA's
national contractor's technical assessment report from September 29,
2009, did not find any additional domestic manufacturers of the
specified manufactured good.
The purpose of the ARRA is to stimulate economic recovery in part
by funding current infrastructure construction, not to delay projects
that are ``shovel ready'' by requiring communities such as Auburn to
revise their standards and specifications and to start the bidding
process again. The imposition of ARRA Buy American requirements on such
projects otherwise eligible for ARRA State Revolving Fund assistance
would result in unreasonable delay and thus displace the ``shovel
ready'' status for this project. To further delay project
implementation is in direct conflict with a fundamental economic
purpose of the ARRA, which is to create or retain jobs.
The State and Tribal Programs Branch has reviewed this waiver
request and has determined that the supporting documentation provided
by LaSalle is sufficient to meet the criteria listed under Section
1605(b) of the ARRA and in the April 28, 2009, ``Implementation of Buy
American provisions of Public Law 111-5, the `American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009' Memorandum'': Iron, steel, and the
manufactured goods are not produced in the United States in sufficient
and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory quality. The
basis for this project waiver is the authorization provided in Section
1605(b)(2) of the ARRA. Due to the lack of production of this product
in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities
and of a satisfactory quality in order to meet LaSalle's performance
specifications and requirements, a waiver from the Buy American
requirement is justified.
The March 31, 2009 Delegation of Authority Memorandum provided
Regional Administrators with the authority to issue exceptions to
Section
[[Page 6030]]
1605 of the ARRA within the geographic boundaries of their respective
regions and with respect to requests by individual grant recipients.
Having established both a proper basis to specify the particular good
required for this project, and that this manufactured good was not
available from a producer in the United States, LaSalle is hereby
granted a waiver from the Buy American requirements of Section 1605(a)
of Public Law 111-5 for the purchase of the MBR membrane racks using
ARRA funds as specified in the community's request of September 10,
2009. This supplementary information constitutes the detailed written
justification required by Section 1605(c) for waivers ``based on a
finding under subsection (b).''
Authority: Pub. L. 111-5, section 1605.
Dated: January 7, 2010.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2010-2541 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P