Safety Zone; Dive Platform, Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa, 5907-5909 [2010-2470]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 24 / Friday, February 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Point In Space serving Claremore Regional
Hospital Heliport.
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
*
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant
Commander Marcella Granquist,
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Honolulu, telephone
808–522–8266, extention 352, e-mail
Marcella.A.Granquist@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
*
*
*
Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on January 26,
2010.
Ronnie Uhlenhaker,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2010–2531 Filed 2–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0002]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Dive Platform, Pago Pago
Harbor, American Samoa
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes a
temporary safety zone around a dive
platform vessel in Pago Pago Harbor,
American Samoa, while diving
operations are under way in and around
the CHEHALIS wreck. The safety zone
is necessary to protect other vessels and
the general public from hazards
associated with dive operations. Entry
into or remaining in the safety zone
during the effective period would be
prohibited unless authorized by the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Honolulu.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before March 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0002 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:32 Feb 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2010–0002),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2010–0002’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8c by 11
inches, suitable for copying and
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5907
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010–
0002’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On October 7, 1949 the 4,130-ton
gasoline tanker CHEHALIS sank in Pago
Pago Inner Harbor, in an estimated 160
feet of water, approximately 350-feet
from the fuel dock located near Goat
Island Point, Pago Pago, American
Samoa. Today, the CHEHALIS wreck
remains a potential pollution threat to
the environment. The U.S. Coast Guard
is scheduled to conduct dive operations
to mitigate the wreck’s potential
pollution threat to the area from March
29, 2010 through April 17, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
5908
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 24 / Friday, February 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would establish a
temporary safety zone extending 200
feet (67 meters) in radius around the
wreck CHEHALIS, and from the surface
of the water to the ocean floor. The
wreck’s approximate position is
14°16.52′ S, 170°40.56′ W, and
approximately 350 feet north of the fuel
dock in Pago Pago Harbor, American
Samoa. This safety zone would be
effective from 6 a.m. on March 29, 2010
through 8 p.m. on April 17, 2010 (local
American Samoa Time). Entry into or
remaining in the safety zone during the
effective period would be prohibited
unless authorized by the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port Honolulu.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
Vessels will be able to transit around the
zone, and Sector Honolulu Captain of
the Port may allow vessels in the zone
on a case-by-case basis.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Vessels will be allowed to
transit around the 200-foot temporary
Safety Zone that will be centered over
the CHEHALIS wreck at approximately
350 feet from the fuel dock in Pago Pago
Inner Harbor, American Samoa. If you
think that your business, organization,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:32 Feb 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as
a small entity and that this proposed
rule would have a significant economic
impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you
think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically
affect it.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Assistance for Small Entities
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Lieutenant
Commander Marcella Granquist,
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Honolulu, telephone
808–842–2600, e-mail
Marcella.A.Granquist@uscg.mil. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 24 / Friday, February 5, 2010 / Proposed Rules
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This rule would be
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction
because it would establish a safety zone.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
around the dive platform vessel while it
is performing dive operations in and
around the CHEHALIS wreck. This
safety zone extends from the surface of
the water to the ocean floor. The wreck’s
approximate position is 14°16.52′ S,
170°40.56′ W, which is approximately
350 feet north of the fuel dock in Pago
Pago Harbor, American Samoa. These
coordinates are based upon the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration Coast Survey, Pacific
Ocean, Samoa Islands, chart 83484.
(b) Prohibited activities. (1) Entry into
or remaining in the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section is prohibited unless authorized
by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Honolulu.
(2) Persons desiring to transit the
safety zone may contact the Captain of
the Port at telephone number 1–808–
842–2600, the U.S. Coast Guard Marine
Safety Detachment American Samoa at
telephone number 1–684–633–2299, or
the dive platform vessel on VHF
channel 16 (156.800 MHz) or VHF
channel 13 (156.650 MHz) to seek
permission to transit the area. If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
(c) Effective period. This rule is
effective from 6 a.m. local American
Samoa time on March 29, 2010 through
8 p.m. local American Samoa time on
April 17, 2010.
(d) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the zone except for
support vessels/aircraft and support
personnel, or other vessels authorized
by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representatives.
(e) Penalties. Vessels or persons
violating this rule would be subject to
the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232
and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Dated: January 11, 2010.
B.A. Compagnoni,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2010–2470 Filed 2–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
2. Add § 165.T14–199 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T14–199 Safety Zone; Dive Platform
Vessel, Pago Pago Harbor, American
Samoa.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All waters
within a 200 foot (67 meter) radius
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:32 Feb 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
5909
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 67
[Docket ID FEMA–2010–0003; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1085]
Proposed Flood Elevation
Determinations
AGENCY: Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: Comments are requested on
the proposed Base (1% annual-chance)
Flood Elevations (BFEs) and proposed
BFE modifications for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose
of this notice is to seek general
information and comment regarding the
proposed regulatory flood elevations for
the reach described by the downstream
and upstream locations in the table
below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are
a part of the floodplain management
measures that the community is
required either to adopt or show
evidence of having in effect in order to
qualify or remain qualified for
participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition,
these elevations, once finalized, will be
used by insurance agents, and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance
premium rates for new buildings and
the contents in those buildings.
DATES: Comments are to be submitted
on or before May 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: The corresponding
preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM) for the proposed BFEs for each
community is available for inspection at
the community’s map repository. The
respective addresses are listed in the
table below.
You may submit comments, identified
by Docket No. FEMA–B–1085, to Kevin
C. Long, Acting Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Mitigation
Directorate, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2820,
or (e-mail) kevin.long@dhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief,
Engineering Management Branch,
Mitigation Directorate, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646–2820, or (e-mail)
kevin.long@dhs.gov.
The
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) proposes to make
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5907-5909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2470]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0002]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Dive Platform, Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes a temporary safety zone around a dive
platform vessel in Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa, while diving
operations are under way in and around the CHEHALIS wreck. The safety
zone is necessary to protect other vessels and the general public from
hazards associated with dive operations. Entry into or remaining in the
safety zone during the effective period would be prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Honolulu.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before March 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0002 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant Commander Marcella Granquist, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Honolulu, telephone 808-
522-8266, extention 352, e-mail Marcella.A.Granquist@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-0002), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-0002'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8[frac12] by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by
mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-0002'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Background and Purpose
On October 7, 1949 the 4,130-ton gasoline tanker CHEHALIS sank in
Pago Pago Inner Harbor, in an estimated 160 feet of water,
approximately 350-feet from the fuel dock located near Goat Island
Point, Pago Pago, American Samoa. Today, the CHEHALIS wreck remains a
potential pollution threat to the environment. The U.S. Coast Guard is
scheduled to conduct dive operations to mitigate the wreck's potential
pollution threat to the area from March 29, 2010 through April 17,
2010.
[[Page 5908]]
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would establish a temporary safety zone extending
200 feet (67 meters) in radius around the wreck CHEHALIS, and from the
surface of the water to the ocean floor. The wreck's approximate
position is 14[deg]16.52' S, 170[deg]40.56' W, and approximately 350
feet north of the fuel dock in Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa. This
safety zone would be effective from 6 a.m. on March 29, 2010 through 8
p.m. on April 17, 2010 (local American Samoa Time). Entry into or
remaining in the safety zone during the effective period would be
prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Honolulu.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. Vessels will be able to
transit around the zone, and Sector Honolulu Captain of the Port may
allow vessels in the zone on a case-by-case basis.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Vessels will be allowed to transit around the
200-foot temporary Safety Zone that will be centered over the CHEHALIS
wreck at approximately 350 feet from the fuel dock in Pago Pago Inner
Harbor, American Samoa. If you think that your business, organization,
or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this
proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please
submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies
and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Lieutenant Commander Marcella
Granquist, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Honolulu, telephone 808-842-2600, e-mail Marcella.A.Granquist@uscg.mil.
If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call
1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these
[[Page 5909]]
standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards
(e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation;
test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems
practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This rule
would be categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g),
of the Instruction because it would establish a safety zone. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T14-199 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T14-199 Safety Zone; Dive Platform Vessel, Pago Pago Harbor,
American Samoa.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
waters within a 200 foot (67 meter) radius around the dive platform
vessel while it is performing dive operations in and around the
CHEHALIS wreck. This safety zone extends from the surface of the water
to the ocean floor. The wreck's approximate position is 14[deg]16.52'
S, 170[deg]40.56' W, which is approximately 350 feet north of the fuel
dock in Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa. These coordinates are based
upon the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coast Survey,
Pacific Ocean, Samoa Islands, chart 83484.
(b) Prohibited activities. (1) Entry into or remaining in the
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited
unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Honolulu.
(2) Persons desiring to transit the safety zone may contact the
Captain of the Port at telephone number 1-808-842-2600, the U.S. Coast
Guard Marine Safety Detachment American Samoa at telephone number 1-
684-633-2299, or the dive platform vessel on VHF channel 16 (156.800
MHz) or VHF channel 13 (156.650 MHz) to seek permission to transit the
area. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply
with the instructions of the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
(c) Effective period. This rule is effective from 6 a.m. local
American Samoa time on March 29, 2010 through 8 p.m. local American
Samoa time on April 17, 2010.
(d) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR part 165, subpart C, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
zone except for support vessels/aircraft and support personnel, or
other vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representatives.
(e) Penalties. Vessels or persons violating this rule would be
subject to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Dated: January 11, 2010.
B.A. Compagnoni,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2010-2470 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P