Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Albuquerque-Bernalillo County, NM; Excess Emissions, 5707-5708 [2010-2394]
Download as PDF
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Proposed Rules
program for states in which HUD will
administer the installation program. As
a result, there are several states in which
there is not yet either a state-certified
and fully accepted installation program
or an operational HUD-administered
installation program.
HUD has determined that, in order to
protect against undue financial risk, a
manufactured home that is installed in
accordance with the Model Installation
Standards (rather than erected on a
permanent foundation) should not be
permitted to be the security for FHA
Title I-insured loans or Title II-insured
mortgages, until there is operating in the
state where the manufactured home is
located either a state-certified and fully
accepted installation program or a HUDadministered installation program. (This
determination does not affect the
eligibility of manufactured homes to be
the security for Title I-insured loans if
the manufacturer’s installation
requirements provide for compliance
with the Model Installation Standards
and the manufactured home is in fact
installed with the Model Installation
Standards.) An operational and fully
compliant installation program is
critical to ensure that a manufactured
home that is to be the security for a Title
I-insured loan or Title II-insured
mortgage is in fact installed in
accordance with the Model Installation
Standards.
As a result, HUD submits that it
would not be appropriate to promulgate
a final rule based on the September 15,
2008 proposed rule, which assumed
fully compliant installation programs
would be operational in all states and
territories, that does not take into
consideration the implementation issues
that have resulted from the June 2008
final rule. HUD submits for
consideration and public comment that
it would be appropriate for
manufactured homes in a state with an
operational state-certified and fully
accepted installation program, or HUDadministered installation program, to be
eligible for Title I and Title II insurance,
even while review, full acceptance, or
implementation of installation programs
in other states and territories still is
pending.
Accordingly, HUD is soliciting public
comment on whether HUD should: (a)
Promulgate a final rule based on the
September 15, 2008 proposed rule, but
that is applicable to a state only at such
time that the state has an operational
state-certified and fully accepted
installation program or a HUDadministered installation program; or (b)
delay promulgation of a final rule based
on the September 15, 2008 proposed
rule until all states and territories have
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:45 Feb 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
an operational state-certified and fully
accepted installation program or a HUDadministered installation program.
Dated: January 27, 2010.
David H. Stevens,
Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2010–2367 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
5707
proposed rule and confirm the effective
date of the direct-final rule if it received
no significant adverse comments on the
direct final rule by September 10, 2009.
OSHA received eight comments on the
direct-final rule by that date, which it
determined were not significant adverse
comments. OSHA subsequently
published a notice announcing this
determination and confirming the
effective date of the direct-final rule as
November 9, 2009 (74 FR 57883).
Accordingly, OSHA is not proceeding
with the proposed rule and is
withdrawing it from the rulemaking
process.
29 CFR Part 1910
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1910
[Docket No. OSH–2008–0034]
Acetylene, General industry,
Occupational safety and health, Safety.
RIN No. 1218–AC08
Revising Standards Referenced in the
Acetylene Standard
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
SUMMARY: With this document, OSHA is
withdrawing the proposed rule that
accompanied its direct-final rule
revising the Acetylene Standard for
general industry.
DATES: As of February 4, 2010, the
proposed rule published August 11,
2009 (74 FR 40450), is withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
General information and press inquiries:
Contact Jennifer Ashley, Director, OSHA
Office of Communications, Room N–
3647, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693–1999.
Technical information: Contact Ted
Twardowski, Directorate of Standards
and Guidance, Room N–3609, OSHA,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693–2070;
fax: (202) 693–1663.
Copies of this Federal Register notice:
Electronic copies of this Federal
Register notice are available at https://
www.regulations.gov. This Federal
Register notice, as well as news releases
and other relevant information, are also
available at OSHA’s Webpage at
https://www.osha.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
11, 2009, OSHA published a direct-final
rule to update the incorporated
references in its Acetylene Standard for
general industry at 29 CFR 1910.102 (74
FR 40442). OSHA also published a
companion proposed rule along with
the direct-final rule (74 FR 40450). In
the direct-final rule, OSHA stated that it
would withdraw the companion
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of
Labor for Occupational Safety and
Health, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210, directed the preparation of
this document. OSHA is issuing this
document pursuant to Sections 4, 6, and
8 of the Occupational Safety and Health
Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 653, 655, and
657), 5 U.S.C. 553, Secretary of Labor’s
Order 5–2007 (72 FR 31160), and 29
CFR part 1911.
Signed at Washington, DC, on January 29,
2010.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–2313 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2009–0745; FRL–9110–1]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; AlbuquerqueBernalillo County, NM; Excess
Emissions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to
approve revisions to the New Mexico
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the Governor of New
Mexico on behalf of the Albuquerque
Environmental Health Department
(AEHD) in a letter dated September 23,
2009 (the September 23, 2009 SIP
submittal). The September 23, 2009 SIP
submittal concerns revisions to New
E:\FR\FM\04FEP1.SGM
04FEP1
5708
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Mexico Administrative Code Title 20,
Chapter 11, Part 49, Excess Emissions
(20.11.49 NMAC—Excess Emissions)
occurring during startup, shutdown, and
malfunction related activities. We are
proposing to approve the September 23,
2009 SIP submittal in accordance with
the requirements of section 110 of the
Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before March 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning
Section (6PD–L), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically or through hand delivery/
courier by following the detailed
instructions in the ADDRESSES section of
the direct final rule located in the Rules
Section of this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Alan Shar, Air Planning Section (6PD–
L), Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, telephone
(214) 665–6691, fax (214) 665–7263,
e-mail address shar.alan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
final Rules Section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments
are received in response to this action,
no further activity is contemplated. If
EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. The EPA
will not institute a second comment
period. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so
at this time. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
For additional information, see the
direct final rule, which is located in the
Rules Section of this Federal Register.
Dated: January 25, 2010.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2010–2394 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 228
[EPA–R10–OW–2010–0086; FRL–9109–4]
Ocean Dumping; Designation of Ocean
Dredged Material Disposal Sites
Offshore of the Siuslaw River, OR
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to designate
two new ocean dredged material
disposal sites near the mouth of the
Siuslaw River, Oregon, pursuant to the
Marine Protection, Research and
Sanctuaries Act, as amended (MPRSA).
The new sites are needed primarily to
serve the long-term need for a location
to dispose of material dredged from the
Siuslaw River navigation channel, and
to provide a location for the disposal of
dredged material for persons who have
received a permit for such disposal. The
newly designated sites will be subject to
ongoing monitoring and management to
ensure continued protection of the
marine environment.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
must be received no later than March 8,
2010.
ADDRESSES: For more information on
this proposed rule, Docket ID No. EPA–
R10–OW–2010–0086 use one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for accessing the
docket and materials related to this
proposed rule.
• E-mail: Winkler.Jessica@epa.gov.
• Mail: Jessica Winkler, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 10, Office of Ecosystems, Tribal
and Public Affairs (ETPA–088),
Environmental Review and Sediment
Management Unit, 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Suite 900, Seattle, Washington 98101.
Publicly available docket materials
are available either electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy during normal business hours for
the regional library at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 10, Library, 10th Floor, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle,
Washington 98101. For access to the
documents at the Region 10 Library,
contact the Region 10 Library Reference
Desk at (206) 553–1289, between the
hours of 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., and between
the hours of 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays, for an appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Winkler, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of
Ecosystems, Tribal and Public Affairs
(ETPA–083), Environmental Review and
Sediment Management Unit, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, Washington
98101, phone number: (206) 553–7369,
e-mail: winkler.jessica@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Potentially Affected Persons
Persons potentially affected by this
action include those who seek or might
seek permits or approval by EPA to
dispose of dredged material into ocean
waters pursuant to the Marine
Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, as amended (MPRSA), 33 U.S.C.
1401 to 1445. EPA’s proposed action
would be relevant to persons, including
organizations and government bodies
seeking to dispose of dredged material
in ocean waters offshore of the Siuslaw
River, Oregon. Currently, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) would be
most affected by this action. Potentially
affected categories and persons include:
Examples of potentially regulated persons
Federal Government ................................................................
Industry and General Public .....................................................
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Category
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Projects, and other Federal Agencies.
Port Authorities, Marinas and Harbors, Shipyards and Marine Repair Facilities,
Berth Owners.
Governments owning and/or responsible for ports, harbors, and/or berths, Government agencies requiring disposal of dredged material associated with public
works projects.
State, local and tribal governments .........................................
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding persons likely to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:45 Feb 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
be affected by this action. For any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular person, please
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
refer to the contact person listed in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E:\FR\FM\04FEP1.SGM
04FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5707-5708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2394]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2009-0745; FRL-9110-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Albuquerque-
Bernalillo County, NM; Excess Emissions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the New Mexico
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Governor of New Mexico
on behalf of the Albuquerque Environmental Health Department (AEHD) in
a letter dated September 23, 2009 (the September 23, 2009 SIP
submittal). The September 23, 2009 SIP submittal concerns revisions to
New
[[Page 5708]]
Mexico Administrative Code Title 20, Chapter 11, Part 49, Excess
Emissions (20.11.49 NMAC--Excess Emissions) occurring during startup,
shutdown, and malfunction related activities. We are proposing to
approve the September 23, 2009 SIP submittal in accordance with the
requirements of section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following
the detailed instructions in the Addresses section of the direct final
rule located in the Rules Section of this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alan Shar, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-6691, fax
(214) 665-7263, e-mail address shar.alan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final Rules Section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this
action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on
this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at
this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
For additional information, see the direct final rule, which is
located in the Rules Section of this Federal Register.
Dated: January 25, 2010.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2010-2394 Filed 2-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P