Bridger-Teton National Forest, Big Piney Ranger District, WY; Piney Creeks Vegetation Treatment, 5758-5759 [2010-2078]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
5758
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Notices
benefits. The berms also serve as seed
banks for native vegetation, and the
woody debris can be used on the
restored site to disrupt overland flow.
The berms screened for removal and use
will be selected based on criteria that
are currently being developed by NRCS.
Berms which are growing species which
are listed on the State of Alaska list of
noxious weeds (11 AAC 34.020) will be
eliminated from consideration, and no
berms will be removed from lands
currently enrolled in the Cropland
Reserve Program.
The cost of this alternative is roughly
estimated at $8 to $10 million dollars.
Even with site restoration, some shortterm maintenance will be required if the
recently restored site is damaged by
flow events. While it will be relatively
expensive to restore the project site, the
re-planning team considered the
expense justifiable in light of current
conditions and public concerns. This
justification is premised on the
reduction of erosion from the existing
project site by removing the training
dikes and side inlets that concentrate
inflow to the basin, as well as removing
the artificially steep flow gradient into
the existing basin. In addition,
restoration efforts would involve
removing the built-up 1408 Road. The
road currently functions as a levee and
concentrates flow from the infiltration
basin to the Alaska Highway.
Agency scoping letters for the
proposed project were sent on July 10,
2009, with a scoping meeting and site
visit conducted on August 5, 2009. The
Draft Environmental Assessment was
made available for public and agency
review on September 17, 2009, with a
public open house being held in Delta
Junction on September 28, 2009. A
follow-up meeting with agencies was
held on September 29, 2009 also in
Delta Junction. Details regarding the
public and agency involvement are
discussed in the Final Environmental
Assessment.
Based on the information in the Final
Environmental Assessment the
proposed action is not a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment, and a
Finding of No Significant Impact was
issued on January 11, 2010.
Signed in Palmer, Alaska, on January 11,
2010.
Robert N. Jones,
State Conservationist (Alaska).
[FR Doc. 2010–2403 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–2D–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:31 Feb 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Bridger-Teton National Forest, Big
Piney Ranger District, WY; Piney
Creeks Vegetation Treatment
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Big Piney Ranger District
is proposing to implement vegetation
management in the Piney Creek
drainages throughout the next five–
seven years. The need for vegetation
management in this area has previously
been identified and studied in the
Bridger-Teton Forest Plan implemented
in 1990, in public meetings held on the
revision of the Forest Plan in 2008 and
comprehensive evaluation reports for
aspen, lodge pole pine, Douglas fir,
spruce fir and white bark pine. The
analysis area is approximately 20,000
acres within this watershed and
includes the creeks of South, Middle
and North on the Big Piney Ranger
District of the Bridger-Teton National
Forest. The area also includes Middle
and North Piney Lakes, Wyoming Peak
the Middle Piney Summer homes,
Sacajawea and Middle Piney Lake
campgrounds. Management
opportunities, practices, standards and
guidelines, and mitigation have been
developed to help achieve desired
resource conditions. These are the basis
for this proposal and for further site
specific analysis of effects. It is
approximately 25 miles west of Big
Piney, Wyoming in the Green River
drainage, on the east slope of the
Wyoming range. All lands within the
analysis area are National Forest System
lands within Sublette County,
Wyoming. The legal description
includes portions of T28N through
T31N and R112W through R114W.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
March 15, 2010. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected in November 2011 and the
final environmental impact statement is
expected in April 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
District Ranger, Big Piney Ranger
District, Box 218, Big Piney, Wyoming
83113. Comments may also be sent via
e-mail to
mailroorn_r4_bridger_teton@fs.fed.us
and on the subject line put only ‘‘Piney
Creeks Vegetation Treatment’’, or via
facsimile to 307–276–5250.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such a way that they are useful to the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Agency’s preparation of the EIS.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
District Ranger, Big Piney Ranger
District, Box 218, Big Piney, Wyoming
83113 or phone (307) 276–3710.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of this proposal is to
improve Forest resource conditions in
the South, Middle and North Piney
Creek drainages, bringing them closer to
desired conditions. Desired conditions
for each of the DFC’s would help restore
healthy ecosystem functioning and
support sustainable resource use.
Proposed Action
This proposal was developed in
response to public issues from changes
since the approval of the Forest Plan in
1990, Forest Plan Revision meetings,
and recent resource issues. Treat up to
8,000 acres of aspen stands and the
surrounding sagebrush with mechanical
treatments and prescribed fire to
regenerate healthy aspen and sagebrush
and remove conifers. Harvest trees on
approximately 4,000 acres using various
cutting practices. This is to provide for
regeneration of the declining lodge pole
pine and mixed conifer forests and for
age class diversity across the landscape.
Possible Alternatives
This alternative is required under
NEPA regulations and also serves as a
baseline of information for comparison
of other alternatives. Though this
alternative does not respond to the
purpose and need for action, it does
address some issues.
Responsible Official
District Forest Ranger, Big Piney
Ranger District, P.O. Box 218, Big Piney,
Wyoming 83113.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
This decision will be whether or not
to implement specific vegetation
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2010 / Notices
management projects as allowed in the
Bridger-Teton National Forest Plan. The
decision would include any mitigation
measures needed in addition to those
prescribed in the Forest Plan.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Preliminary Issues
The Forest Service has identified the
following potential issues. No
determination has been made as to
which issues will be examined in detail
in the environmental analysis. Your
input will help determine which of
these issues merit detailed analysis and
will also help identify additional issues
related to the proposed action that may
not be listed here.
Issue 1—Amount and/or types of
vegetation treatments in the proposed
action and the effects on old growth and
mature vegetation for lynx, security
cover for elk and other habitat, as well
as Colorado cutthroat trout habitat.
Issue 2—Forest health, specifically
the high proportion of older age class
conifer stands and declining tree
growth, dwarf mistletoe infection levels
in lodge pole pine and high fuel
loadings from dead and down material.
Issue 3—Amount of aspen treatments.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. The Forest Service is
seeking information, comments, and
assistance from individuals,
organizations, tribal governments, and
federal, state, and local agencies
interested in or affected by this project.
Public participation will be solicited by
notifying in person and/or by mail
known interested and affected publics.
News releases will be used to give the
public general notice. Public
participation activities would include
requests for written comments. The first
formal opportunity to comment is to
respond to this notice of intent, which
initiates the scoping process (40 CFR
1501.7). Scoping includes: (1)
Identifying potential issues, (2)
narrowing the potential issues and
identifying significant issues of those
that have been covered by prior
environmental review, (3) exploring
alternatives in addition to No Action,
and (4) identifying potential
environmental effects of the proposed
action and alternatives.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:31 Feb 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Dated: December 31, 2009.
Gregory Clark,
District Forest Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2010–2078 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Notice of Resource Advisory
Committee Meeting
AGENCY: Lassen Resource Advisory
Committee, Susanville, California,
USDA Forest Service.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committees Act
(Pub.L. 92–463) and under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110
343) the Lassen County Resource
Advisory Committee will meet February
10, 2010 in Susanville, California for a
business meeting. The meeting is open
to the public.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
business meeting on February 10, 2010
will begin at 9 a.m., at the Lassen
National Forest Headquarters Office,
Caribou Conference Room, 2550
Riverside Drive, Susanville, CA 96130.
This meeting will be dedicated to
review the proposals for 2009 funding
cycle, hear project presentations and
vote on projects to recommend for
funding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Terri Frolli, Designated Federal
Official, at (530) 257–4188; or Public
Affairs Officer, Heidi Perry, at (530)
252–6604.
Kathleen S. Morse,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010–2079 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Notice of New Recreation Fee Site;
Federal Lands Recreation
Enhancement Act, (Title VIII,
Pub. L. 108–447)
AGENCY: Caribou-Targhee National
Forest, USDA Forest Service.
ACTION: Notice of New Recreation Fee
Sites.
SUMMARY: The Soda Springs Ranger
District of the Caribou-Targhee National
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
5759
Forest is proposing to take reservations
for group camping and group day use
picnicking at the Trail Canyon Group
Site on the Soda Springs Ranger District.
They are proposing to charge a $40 fee
per day for group camping and group
day use picnicking (up to a maximum
of 100 people). Fees are assessed based
on the level of amenities and services
provided, cost of operations and
maintenance, market assessment and
public comment. The fee is proposed
and will be determined upon further
analysis and public comment. To date,
an analysis of the facility shows that the
proposed fees are reasonable and typical
of similar sites in the area. Use at other
similar facilities on the Caribou-Targhee
National Forest has shown that publics
appreciate and enjoy the availability of
developed recreation campground and
picnicking facilities. This facility will
remain free of charge during the winter
season as a warming shelter. Funds from
the use of these developed facilities will
be used for the continued operation and
maintenance of the Trail Canyon Group
Site.
DATES: Comments will be accepted
through July 16, 2010. Trail Canyon
Group Site will become available to the
public for group camping and group day
use picnicking from May 15 through
October 31 each year.
ADDRESSES: Forest Supervisor, CaribouTarghee National Forest, 1405 Hollipark
Dr., Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maury Young, Recreation Technician,
208–847–0375.
The
Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement
Act (Title VII, Pub. L. 108–447) directed
the Secretary of Agriculture to publish
a six month advance notice in the
Federal Register whenever new
recreation fee areas are established. The
Caribou-Targhee National Forest
currently has over 40 other developed
campgrounds. These campgrounds are
well used and are very popular during
the summer and fall seasons. A business
analysis of this campground/picnic area
has shown that people desire having
this sort of developed recreation
experience on the Caribou-Targhee
National Forest. A market analysis
indicates that the $40 group fee (up to
a maximum of 100 people) per night is
both reasonable and acceptable for this
type of recreation experience.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: January 25, 2010.
Brent L. Larson,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010–2080 Filed 2–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5758-5759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2078]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Bridger-Teton National Forest, Big Piney Ranger District, WY;
Piney Creeks Vegetation Treatment
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Big Piney Ranger District is proposing to implement
vegetation management in the Piney Creek drainages throughout the next
five-seven years. The need for vegetation management in this area has
previously been identified and studied in the Bridger-Teton Forest Plan
implemented in 1990, in public meetings held on the revision of the
Forest Plan in 2008 and comprehensive evaluation reports for aspen,
lodge pole pine, Douglas fir, spruce fir and white bark pine. The
analysis area is approximately 20,000 acres within this watershed and
includes the creeks of South, Middle and North on the Big Piney Ranger
District of the Bridger-Teton National Forest. The area also includes
Middle and North Piney Lakes, Wyoming Peak the Middle Piney Summer
homes, Sacajawea and Middle Piney Lake campgrounds. Management
opportunities, practices, standards and guidelines, and mitigation have
been developed to help achieve desired resource conditions. These are
the basis for this proposal and for further site specific analysis of
effects. It is approximately 25 miles west of Big Piney, Wyoming in the
Green River drainage, on the east slope of the Wyoming range. All lands
within the analysis area are National Forest System lands within
Sublette County, Wyoming. The legal description includes portions of
T28N through T31N and R112W through R114W.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by March 15, 2010. The draft environmental impact statement is expected
in November 2011 and the final environmental impact statement is
expected in April 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to District Ranger, Big Piney Ranger
District, Box 218, Big Piney, Wyoming 83113. Comments may also be sent
via e-mail to mailroorn_r4_bridger_teton@fs.fed.us and on the
subject line put only ``Piney Creeks Vegetation Treatment'', or via
facsimile to 307-276-5250.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such a way that they are useful to the Agency's preparation of
the EIS. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of
the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer's
concerns and contentions.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered, however.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: District Ranger, Big Piney Ranger
District, Box 218, Big Piney, Wyoming 83113 or phone (307) 276-3710.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of this proposal is to improve Forest resource
conditions in the South, Middle and North Piney Creek drainages,
bringing them closer to desired conditions. Desired conditions for each
of the DFC's would help restore healthy ecosystem functioning and
support sustainable resource use.
Proposed Action
This proposal was developed in response to public issues from
changes since the approval of the Forest Plan in 1990, Forest Plan
Revision meetings, and recent resource issues. Treat up to 8,000 acres
of aspen stands and the surrounding sagebrush with mechanical
treatments and prescribed fire to regenerate healthy aspen and
sagebrush and remove conifers. Harvest trees on approximately 4,000
acres using various cutting practices. This is to provide for
regeneration of the declining lodge pole pine and mixed conifer forests
and for age class diversity across the landscape.
Possible Alternatives
This alternative is required under NEPA regulations and also serves
as a baseline of information for comparison of other alternatives.
Though this alternative does not respond to the purpose and need for
action, it does address some issues.
Responsible Official
District Forest Ranger, Big Piney Ranger District, P.O. Box 218,
Big Piney, Wyoming 83113.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
This decision will be whether or not to implement specific
vegetation
[[Page 5759]]
management projects as allowed in the Bridger-Teton National Forest
Plan. The decision would include any mitigation measures needed in
addition to those prescribed in the Forest Plan.
Preliminary Issues
The Forest Service has identified the following potential issues.
No determination has been made as to which issues will be examined in
detail in the environmental analysis. Your input will help determine
which of these issues merit detailed analysis and will also help
identify additional issues related to the proposed action that may not
be listed here.
Issue 1--Amount and/or types of vegetation treatments in the
proposed action and the effects on old growth and mature vegetation for
lynx, security cover for elk and other habitat, as well as Colorado
cutthroat trout habitat.
Issue 2--Forest health, specifically the high proportion of older
age class conifer stands and declining tree growth, dwarf mistletoe
infection levels in lodge pole pine and high fuel loadings from dead
and down material.
Issue 3--Amount of aspen treatments.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. The Forest
Service is seeking information, comments, and assistance from
individuals, organizations, tribal governments, and federal, state, and
local agencies interested in or affected by this project. Public
participation will be solicited by notifying in person and/or by mail
known interested and affected publics. News releases will be used to
give the public general notice. Public participation activities would
include requests for written comments. The first formal opportunity to
comment is to respond to this notice of intent, which initiates the
scoping process (40 CFR 1501.7). Scoping includes: (1) Identifying
potential issues, (2) narrowing the potential issues and identifying
significant issues of those that have been covered by prior
environmental review, (3) exploring alternatives in addition to No
Action, and (4) identifying potential environmental effects of the
proposed action and alternatives.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
Dated: December 31, 2009.
Gregory Clark,
District Forest Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2010-2078 Filed 2-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M