Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning a Certain Alternator, 5618-5620 [2010-2305]
Download as PDF
5618
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2010 / Notices
• Provide any other information that
will help the FOIA staff determine
which DHS component agency may
have responsive records; and
• If your request is seeking records
pertaining to another living individual,
you must include a statement from that
individual certifying his/her agreement
for you to access his/her records.
Without this bulleted information the
component(s) may not be able to
conduct an effective search, and your
request may be denied due to lack of
specificity or lack of compliance with
applicable regulations.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
See ‘‘Notification procedure’’ above.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Records are generated from sources
contacted during investigations, state
and local law enforcement, and federal
departments and agencies.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
The Secretary of Homeland Security
has exempted this system from the
following provisions of the Privacy Act,
subject to the limitation set forth in
(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I); and (f) of the Privacy Act
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a (k)(1), (k)(2),
and (k)(5) of the Privacy Act.
Dated: January 25, 2010.
Mary Ellen Callahan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2010–2207 Filed 2–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9B–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Cancellation of Customs
Broker License
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: General notice.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 USC
1641) and the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection regulations (19 CFR
111.51(b)), the following Customs
broker license and all associated permits
are cancelled with prejudice.
John T.
Sciara.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
License No.
10286
16:34 Feb 02, 2010
Issuing port
New York.
Jkt 220001
[FR Doc. 2010–2304 Filed 2–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning a Certain
Alternator
final determinations shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Dated: January 21, 2010.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
Attachment
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
See ‘‘Notification procedure’’ above.
Name
Dated: January 26, 2010.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of
International Trade.
H075667
SUMMARY: This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of a certain alternator. Based
upon the facts presented, CBP has
concluded in the final determination
that the U.S. is the country of origin of
the alternator for purposes of U.S.
government procurement.
DATE: The final determination was
issued on January 21, 2010. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination within March 5,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elif
Eroglu, Valuation and Special Programs
Branch: (202) 325–0277.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on January 21, 2010,
pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 177,
subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of the alternator which may be
offered to the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract. This final determination, in
HQ H075667, was issued at the request
of Ecoair Corp. under procedures set
forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
which implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final
determination, CBP has concluded that,
based upon the facts presented, the
alternator, assembled in the U.S. from
parts made in China and the U.S., is
substantially transformed in the U.S.,
such that the U.S. is the country of
origin of the finished article for
purposes of U.S. government
procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations
(19 CFR 177.29), provides that notice of
CATEGORY: Marking
Mr. Peter S. Knudsen, Jr.
Ecoair Corp.
Four Industrial Circle
Hamden, CT 06517–3152
RE: U.S. Government Procurement;
Title III, Trade Agreements Act of
1979 (19 U.S.C. § 2511); Subpart B,
Part 177, CBP Regulations; Country
of Origin; Eco-Tech Heavy Duty
Alternator
Dear Mr. Knudsen: This is in response
to your correspondence of October 31,
2009, in which you requested a final
determination on behalf of Ecoair Corp.
(‘‘Ecoair’’), pursuant to subpart B of part
177, Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) Regulations (19 C.F.R. § 177.21
et seq.). Under the pertinent regulations,
which implement Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.), CBP issues
country of origin advisory rulings and
final determinations as to whether an
article is or would be a product of a
designated country or instrumentality
for the purpose of granting waivers of
certain ‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in
U.S. law or practice for products offered
for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of the Eco-Tech Heavy
Duty Alternator. We note that Ecoair is
a party-at-interest within the meaning of
19 C.F.R. § 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled
to request this final determination.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
January 21, 2010
OT:RR:CTF:VS
H075667 EE
FACTS:
You describe the pertinent facts as
follows. Eco-Tech Alternators operate in
diesel powered military boats, fire
trucks, ambulances, utility trucks,
school shuttles, party buses, and
commercial fishing boats; all
applications where significant operating
time is spent at idle and where electric
power needs are independent of the
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2010 / Notices
engine speed. Eco-Tech alternators
provide 80% of maximum electrical
output at idle versus 30% for typical
conventional alternators. Therefore, all
of the on-board electronics of emergency
vehicles can be supported while
vehicles are operating at idle, instead of
keeping their engines racing in high idle
operation.
You advise that there are two
important parts of alternators: 1. the
electro/mechanical parts including the
rotor, stator, and end frames; and, 2. the
electronic component, i.e. the regulator.
The regulator controls the alternator by
enabling it to supply the amount of
electric power that matches the needs of
the vehicle. Should the regulator not
supply enough power, the battery will
get depleted and the vehicle will stop
operating. If the regulator supplies too
much electrical power, the battery and
the wiring will get hot and fail. You
state that the electro/mechanical parts of
the alternator are manufactured by
Dehong Eco-Tech, a joint venture
company in China. The electronic
portion, the regulator, is manufactured
in the U.S. by Carleton Industries. The
electro/mechanical parts will be
shipped to the Ecoair facility in
Hamden, Connecticut where they will
be assembled with the U.S.
manufactured regulator into the
alternator. The alternator will be tested
and packaged in the U.S.
You have submitted the bill of
materials for the alternator. Some of the
components from China include the
following: stator assembly, rotor
assembly, rectifier, regulator base
assembly, insulators, rear cover, outer
package, and inner package.
Components sourced in the U.S. include
overvoltage transient suppressor,
retainer ring, bearings, regulator, and
cable. Drive end housing and diode end
housing are sourced both in China and
the U.S. You submitted schematics,
photographs, specifications, and the
step-by-step assembly process of the
regulator and the alternator in the U.S.
The assembly of the alternator, from
components including the regulator, is
comprised of thirty-one discrete steps
and fifty-two parts, takes approximately
169 minutes. You claim that each step
is completed by skilled workers who
undergo an extensive training process.
Alternator assembly process involves
pressing the bearing to the drive end
housing; installing the snap ring, the
heilicoil, and the stator; measuring the
stator resistance and stator AUX
winding resistance; using fluke meter to
measure the rotor resistance; a hi-pot
test to check insulation between each
phase to ground; pressing the rotor into
the stator/drive end housing assembly;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:34 Feb 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
installing the SRE housing, installing
the air flow deflector; installing the
rectifier sub-assembly; installing the
heat shrink tubing; and, installing the
regulator back plate and the ignition
protect parts.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the
Eco-Tech Heavy Duty Alternator for the
purpose of U.S. government
procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to subpart B of part 177, 19
C.F.R. § 177.21 et seq., which
implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.), CBP issues
country of origin advisory rulings and
final determinations as to whether an
article is or would be a product of a
designated country or instrumentality
for the purposes of granting waivers of
certain ‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in
U.S. law or practice for products offered
for sale to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth
under 19 U.S.C. § 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly
the growth, product, or manufacture of
that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in
the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from
another country or instrumentality, it
has been substantially transformed into
a new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was so transformed.
See also, 19 C.F.R. § 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and
final determinations for purposes of
U.S. government procurement, CBP
applies the provisions of subpart B of
part 177 consistent with the Federal
Acquisition Regulations. See 19 C.F.R.
§ 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes
that the Federal Acquisition Regulations
restrict the U.S. Government’s purchase
of products to U.S.-made or designated
country end products for acquisitions
subject to the TAA. See 48 C.F.R.
§ 25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition
Regulations define ‘‘U.S.-made end
product’’ as:
* * * an article that is mined,
produced, or manufactured in the
United States or that is substantially
transformed in the United States into a
new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was transformed.
48 C.F.R. § 25.003.
In determining whether the
combining of parts or materials
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5619
constitutes a substantial transformation,
the determinative issue is the extent of
operations performed and whether the
parts lose their identity and become an
integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp.
1149 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1983), aff’d, 741
F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly
operations that are minimal or simple,
as opposed to complex or meaningful,
will generally not result in a substantial
transformation. Factors which may be
relevant in this evaluation may include
the nature of the operation (including
the number of components assembled),
the number of different operations
involved, and whether a significant
period of time, skill, detail, and quality
control are necessary for the assembly
operation. See C.S.D. 80–111, C.S.D. 85–
25, C.S.D. 89–110, C.S.D. 89–118, C.S.D.
90–51, and C.S.D. 90–97. If the
manufacturing or combining process is
a minor one which leaves the identity
of the article intact, a substantial
transformation has not occurred.
Uniroyal, Inc. v. United States, 3 CIT
220, 542 F. Supp. 1026 (1982), aff’d 702
F.2d 1022 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
In order to determine whether a
substantial transformation occurs when
components of various origins are
assembled into completed products,
CBP considers the totality of the
circumstances and makes such
determinations on a case-by-case basis.
The country of origin of the item’s
components, extent of the processing
that occurs within a country, and
whether such processing renders a
product with a new name, character,
and use are primary considerations in
such cases. Additionally, factors such as
the resources expended on product
design and development, extent and
nature of post-assembly inspection and
testing procedures, and the degree of
skill required during the actual
manufacturing process may be relevant
when determining whether a substantial
transformation has occurred. No one
factor is determinative.
In a number of rulings (e.g., HQ
735608, dated April 27, 1995 and HQ
559089 dated August 24, 1995), CBP has
stated: ‘‘in our experience these
inquiries are highly fact and product
specific; generalizations are troublesome
and potentially misleading. The
determination is in this instance ‘a
mixed question of technology and
Customs law, mostly the latter.’ ’’ Texas
Instruments, Inc. v. United States, 681
F.2d 778, 783 (CCPA 1982).
This case involves fifty-three
components which are proposed to be
assembled in the U.S., largely by skilled
workers. The regulator, manufactured in
the U.S., is the electronic component of
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
5620
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2010 / Notices
the alternator, which controls the
electrical output of the alternator to
match the electrical load of the vehicle.
The regulator is a key component of the
alternator. Should the alternator not
supply enough power, the battery will
get depleted and the vehicle will stop
operating. The regulator will be
assembled with fifty-two other
components, into the alternator in a
thirty-one step process which will take
approximately 169 minutes. Under the
described assembly process, the foreign
components lose their individual
identities and become an integral part of
a new article, the alternator, possessing
a new name, character and use. Based
upon the information before us, we find
that the components that are used to
manufacture the alternator, including
the regulator manufactured in the U.S.,
are substantially transformed as a result
of the assembly operations performed in
the U.S., and that the country of origin
of the alternator for government
procurement purposes is the U.S.
HOLDING:
The components that are used to
manufacture the alternator are
substantially transformed as a result of
the assembly operations performed in
the U.S. Therefore, the country of origin
of the alternator for government
procurement purposes is the U.S.
Notice of this final determination will
be given in the Federal Register, as
required by 19 C.F.R. § 177.29. Any
party-at-interest other than the party
which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to
19 C.F.R. § 177.31, that CBP reexamine
the matter anew and issue a new final
determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
§ 177.30, any party-at-interest may,
within 30 days after publication of the
Federal Register notice referenced
above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of
International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2010–2305 Filed 2–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
New Date for April 2010 Customs
Brokers License Examination
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:34 Feb 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
ACTION:
General notice.
SUMMARY: This document announces
that U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) has changed the date on which
the semi-annual written examination for
an individual broker’s license will be
held in April 2010.
DATES: The customs broker’s license
examination scheduled for April 2010
will be held on Wednesday, April 7.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Russell Morris, Broker Compliance
Branch, Office of International Trade,
(202) 863–6543.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1641), provides
that a person (an individual,
corporation, association, or partnership)
must hold a valid customs broker’s
license and permit in order to transact
customs business on behalf of others,
sets forth standards for the issuance of
broker’s licenses and permits, and
provides for the taking of disciplinary
action against brokers that have engaged
in specified types of infractions. In the
case of an applicant for an individual
broker’s license, section 641 provides
that an examination may be conducted
to determine the applicant’s
qualifications for a license.
The regulations issued under the
authority of section 641 are set forth in
part 111 of title 19 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (19 CFR part 111).
Part 111 includes detailed rules
regarding the licensing of, and granting
of permits to, persons desiring to
transact customs business as customs
brokers. These rules include the
qualifications required of applicants and
the procedures for applying for licenses
and permits. Section 111.11 (19 CFR
111.11) sets forth the basic requirements
for a broker’s license and, in paragraph
(a)(4), provides that an applicant for an
individual broker’s license must attain a
passing grade on a written examination
taken within the 3-year period before
submission of the license application
prescribed under § 111.12 (19 CFR
111.12). Section 111.13 (19 CFR 111.13)
sets forth the requirements and
procedures for the written examination
for an individual broker’s license.
Paragraph (b) of § 111.13 pertains to the
date and place of the examination and
states that written customs broker
license examinations will be given on
the first Monday in April and October
unless the regularly scheduled
examination date conflicts with a
national holiday, religious observance,
or other foreseeable event and U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
publishes in the Federal Register
appropriate notice of a change in the
examination date.
CBP recognizes that the first Monday
in April 2010 (April 5) coincides with
the observance of Passover. In
consideration of this conflict with
Passover, CBP has decided to change the
date of the examination pursuant to
§ 111.13(b). Accordingly, this document
announces that CBP has scheduled the
April 2010 examination for Wednesday,
April 7.
Dated: January 26, 2010.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of
International Trade, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2010–2303 Filed 2–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5383–N–02]
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection for Public Comment; Public
Housing Contracting With ResidentOwned Businesses
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Public and Indian
Housing, HUD.
ACTION: Notice of proposed information
collection.
SUMMARY: The proposed information
collection requirement will be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act. The Department is soliciting public
comments on the subject proposal.
DATES: Comments Due Date: April 5,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control number and sent to: Leroy
McKinney, Departmental Reports
Management Officer, QDAM,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street, SW.,
Room 4178, Washington DC 20410–
5000; telephone 202.402.5564 (this is
not a toll-free number) or e-mail Leroy
McKinney at Leroy.McKinney@hud.gov
for a copy of the proposed forms or
other available information. Persons
with hearing or speech impairments
may access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at (800) 877–8339. (Other
than the HUD USER information line
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5618-5620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2305]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning a Certain
Alternator
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of a certain alternator. Based upon the facts
presented, CBP has concluded in the final determination that the U.S.
is the country of origin of the alternator for purposes of U.S.
government procurement.
DATE: The final determination was issued on January 21, 2010. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination within March 5, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elif Eroglu, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch: (202) 325-0277.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on January 21,
2010, pursuant to subpart B of part 177, Customs Regulations (19 CFR
part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of the alternator which may be offered to the U.S.
Government under an undesignated government procurement contract. This
final determination, in HQ H075667, was issued at the request of Ecoair
Corp. under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP has concluded
that, based upon the facts presented, the alternator, assembled in the
U.S. from parts made in China and the U.S., is substantially
transformed in the U.S., such that the U.S. is the country of origin of
the finished article for purposes of U.S. government procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that
notice of final determinations shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: January 21, 2010.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International
Trade.
Attachment
H075667
January 21, 2010
OT:RR:CTF:VS H075667 EE
CATEGORY: Marking
Mr. Peter S. Knudsen, Jr.
Ecoair Corp.
Four Industrial Circle
Hamden, CT 06517-3152
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of
1979 (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511); Subpart B, Part 177, CBP Regulations;
Country of Origin; Eco-Tech Heavy Duty Alternator
Dear Mr. Knudsen: This is in response to your correspondence of
October 31, 2009, in which you requested a final determination on
behalf of Ecoair Corp. (``Ecoair''), pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') Regulations (19 C.F.R. Sec.
177.21 et seq.). Under the pertinent regulations, which implement Title
III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec.
2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of a
designated country or instrumentality for the purpose of granting
waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of the Eco-
Tech Heavy Duty Alternator. We note that Ecoair is a party-at-interest
within the meaning of 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to
request this final determination.
FACTS:
You describe the pertinent facts as follows. Eco-Tech Alternators
operate in diesel powered military boats, fire trucks, ambulances,
utility trucks, school shuttles, party buses, and commercial fishing
boats; all applications where significant operating time is spent at
idle and where electric power needs are independent of the
[[Page 5619]]
engine speed. Eco-Tech alternators provide 80% of maximum electrical
output at idle versus 30% for typical conventional alternators.
Therefore, all of the on-board electronics of emergency vehicles can be
supported while vehicles are operating at idle, instead of keeping
their engines racing in high idle operation.
You advise that there are two important parts of alternators: 1.
the electro/mechanical parts including the rotor, stator, and end
frames; and, 2. the electronic component, i.e. the regulator. The
regulator controls the alternator by enabling it to supply the amount
of electric power that matches the needs of the vehicle. Should the
regulator not supply enough power, the battery will get depleted and
the vehicle will stop operating. If the regulator supplies too much
electrical power, the battery and the wiring will get hot and fail. You
state that the electro/mechanical parts of the alternator are
manufactured by Dehong Eco-Tech, a joint venture company in China. The
electronic portion, the regulator, is manufactured in the U.S. by
Carleton Industries. The electro/mechanical parts will be shipped to
the Ecoair facility in Hamden, Connecticut where they will be assembled
with the U.S. manufactured regulator into the alternator. The
alternator will be tested and packaged in the U.S.
You have submitted the bill of materials for the alternator. Some
of the components from China include the following: stator assembly,
rotor assembly, rectifier, regulator base assembly, insulators, rear
cover, outer package, and inner package. Components sourced in the U.S.
include overvoltage transient suppressor, retainer ring, bearings,
regulator, and cable. Drive end housing and diode end housing are
sourced both in China and the U.S. You submitted schematics,
photographs, specifications, and the step-by-step assembly process of
the regulator and the alternator in the U.S. The assembly of the
alternator, from components including the regulator, is comprised of
thirty-one discrete steps and fifty-two parts, takes approximately 169
minutes. You claim that each step is completed by skilled workers who
undergo an extensive training process.
Alternator assembly process involves pressing the bearing to the
drive end housing; installing the snap ring, the heilicoil, and the
stator; measuring the stator resistance and stator AUX winding
resistance; using fluke meter to measure the rotor resistance; a hi-pot
test to check insulation between each phase to ground; pressing the
rotor into the stator/drive end housing assembly; installing the SRE
housing, installing the air flow deflector; installing the rectifier
sub-assembly; installing the heat shrink tubing; and, installing the
regulator back plate and the ignition protect parts.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the Eco-Tech Heavy Duty Alternator
for the purpose of U.S. government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to subpart B of part 177, 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.21 et seq.,
which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an article is
or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality for
the purposes of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American''
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale to
the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. Sec.
2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i) it
is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality,
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the
article or articles from which it was so transformed.
See also, 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for purposes
of U.S. government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B
of part 177 consistent with the Federal Acquisition Regulations. See 19
C.F.R. Sec. 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the Federal
Acquisition Regulations restrict the U.S. Government's purchase of
products to U.S.-made or designated country end products for
acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48 C.F.R. Sec. 25.403(c)(1). The
Federal Acquisition Regulations define ``U.S.-made end product'' as:
* * * an article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the United
States or that is substantially transformed in the United States into a
new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was
transformed.
48 C.F.R. Sec. 25.003.
In determining whether the combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is
the extent of operations performed and whether the parts lose their
identity and become an integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp. 1149 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983),
aff'd, 741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly operations that are
minimal or simple, as opposed to complex or meaningful, will generally
not result in a substantial transformation. Factors which may be
relevant in this evaluation may include the nature of the operation
(including the number of components assembled), the number of different
operations involved, and whether a significant period of time, skill,
detail, and quality control are necessary for the assembly operation.
See C.S.D. 80-111, C.S.D. 85-25, C.S.D. 89-110, C.S.D. 89-118, C.S.D.
90-51, and C.S.D. 90-97. If the manufacturing or combining process is a
minor one which leaves the identity of the article intact, a
substantial transformation has not occurred. Uniroyal, Inc. v. United
States, 3 CIT 220, 542 F. Supp. 1026 (1982), aff'd 702 F.2d 1022 (Fed.
Cir. 1983).
In order to determine whether a substantial transformation occurs
when components of various origins are assembled into completed
products, CBP considers the totality of the circumstances and makes
such determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of
the item's components, extent of the processing that occurs within a
country, and whether such processing renders a product with a new name,
character, and use are primary considerations in such cases.
Additionally, factors such as the resources expended on product design
and development, extent and nature of post-assembly inspection and
testing procedures, and the degree of skill required during the actual
manufacturing process may be relevant when determining whether a
substantial transformation has occurred. No one factor is
determinative.
In a number of rulings (e.g., HQ 735608, dated April 27, 1995 and
HQ 559089 dated August 24, 1995), CBP has stated: ``in our experience
these inquiries are highly fact and product specific; generalizations
are troublesome and potentially misleading. The determination is in
this instance `a mixed question of technology and Customs law, mostly
the latter.' '' Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States, 681 F.2d 778,
783 (CCPA 1982).
This case involves fifty-three components which are proposed to be
assembled in the U.S., largely by skilled workers. The regulator,
manufactured in the U.S., is the electronic component of
[[Page 5620]]
the alternator, which controls the electrical output of the alternator
to match the electrical load of the vehicle. The regulator is a key
component of the alternator. Should the alternator not supply enough
power, the battery will get depleted and the vehicle will stop
operating. The regulator will be assembled with fifty-two other
components, into the alternator in a thirty-one step process which will
take approximately 169 minutes. Under the described assembly process,
the foreign components lose their individual identities and become an
integral part of a new article, the alternator, possessing a new name,
character and use. Based upon the information before us, we find that
the components that are used to manufacture the alternator, including
the regulator manufactured in the U.S., are substantially transformed
as a result of the assembly operations performed in the U.S., and that
the country of origin of the alternator for government procurement
purposes is the U.S.
HOLDING:
The components that are used to manufacture the alternator are
substantially transformed as a result of the assembly operations
performed in the U.S. Therefore, the country of origin of the
alternator for government procurement purposes is the U.S.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.29. Any party-at-interest
other than the party which requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.31, that CBP reexamine the
matter anew and issue a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
Sec. 177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30 days after
publication of the Federal Register notice referenced above, seek
judicial review of this final determination before the Court of
International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International
Trade.
[FR Doc. 2010-2305 Filed 2-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P