Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Clark, Lincoln, and Nye Counties, NV, 5114-5115 [2010-2046]

Download as PDF 5114 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Notices we will assess the projected revenues and expense of the business activities we will authorize and estimate a fair return to the new concessioner taking into account applicable industry norms. As part of this assessment, we will calculate the cost to the new concessioner of acquiring the existing LSI (and any required new LSI improvements). The minimum franchise fee, accordingly, will reflect the financial consequences of the proposed alternative formula such that the estimated reasonable opportunity for profit to the new concessioner would be projected to be the same whether the new contract included the standard formula or the proposed alternative formula. The proposed alternative formula will not lower the projected returns to the new concessioner but will reduce the speculative nature of LSI value under the standard formula. Please note that, in the interest of time, the NPS may issue a prospectus for the new contract in the near future that incorporates the proposed alternative formula. If consideration of public comments in response to this notice causes us to alter the proposed alternative formula, we will amend the prospectus accordingly before the deadline for submission of proposals. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Daniel N. Wenk, Deputy Director, Operations. [FR Doc. 2010–1864 Filed 1–29–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–53–M DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R8–R–2009–N222; 80230–1265–0000– S3] jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Clark, Lincoln, and Nye Counties, NV AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability: record of decision. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:35 Jan 29, 2010 Jkt 220001 availability of the record of decision (ROD) for the final Comprehensive Conservation Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (CCP/EIS) for the Desert National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) Complex. We completed a thorough analysis of the environmental, social, and economic considerations and presented it in our final CCP/EIS, which we released to the public on August 19, 2009. The ROD documents our decision to adopt and implement the final CCP/ EIS Alternative C, for Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa Valley NWRs and Alternative D for Pahranagat NWR. DATES: The Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, signed the ROD on September 24, 2009. ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the ROD and Final CCP/EIS by any of the following methods: Agency Web site: Download a copy of the documents at https://www.fws.gov/ desertcomplex/ccp.htm. Electronic mail: fw8plancomments@fws.gov. Include ‘‘Desert NWRC ROD’’ in the subject line of the message. Mail: Mark Pelz, Chief, Refuge Conservation Planning, Pacific Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, W– 1832, Sacramento, CA 95825–1846. In person viewing or pickup: Copies of the ROD may be viewed at the Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 4701 North Torrey Pines, Las Vegas, NV 89130. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Martinez, Refuge Complex Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4701 North Torrey Pines, Las Vegas, NV 89130, phone (702) 515–5450 or Mark Pelz, Chief, Refuge Planning, 2800 Cottage Way, W–1832, Sacramento, CA, 95825; (916) 414–6504 (phone); mark_pelz@fws.gov (e-mail). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Introduction With this notice, we finalize the CCP process for the Desert NWR Complex (Ash Meadows, Desert, Moapa Valley and Pahranagat NWRs). The CCP will guide us in managing and administering the four wildlife refuges for the next 15 years. We started this process in a Federal Register notice (67 FR 54229, August 21, 2002). We released the draft CCP/EIS to the public, announcing and requesting comments in a notice of availability in the Federal Register (73 FR 39979) on July 11, 2008. The public review period lasted 60 days. We announced the availability of the final CCP/EIS in the Federal Register (74 FR 41928) on August 19, 2009. PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Ash Meadows NWR was established in 1984 under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. It comprises 23,000 acres of spring-fed wetlands, mesquite bosques, and desert uplands that provide habitat for at least 24 plants and animal species found nowhere else in the world. The Wildlife Refuge is located 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas and 30 miles west of Pahrump. Desert NWR was originally established in 1936 by Executive Order No. 7373 and subsequently modified by Public Land Order 4079, for the protection, enhancement and maintenance of wildlife resources including bighorn sheep. Located just north of Las Vegas, Nevada, the 1.6 million acre Wildlife Refuge is the largest in the lower 48 States. The Moapa Valley NWR was established in 1979 under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, to secure habitat for the endangered Moapa dace. The Wildlife Refuge is located on 116 acres in northeastern Clark County. Due to its small size, fragile habitats, on-going habitat restoration work, and unsafe structures, the Wildlife Refuge is currently closed to the general public. The Pahranagat NWR was established in 1963, under the authority of the Migratory Bird Conservation Act, as amended, to protect habitat for migrating birds in the Pahranagat Valley. The 5,382 acre Wildlife Refuge consists of marshes, meadows, lakes, and upland desert habitat. It provides nesting, resting, and feeding areas for waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, and song birds including the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher. In accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40 CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice announces the availability of the ROD for the final CCP/EIS for the Desert NWR Complex. We completed a thorough analysis of the environmental, social, and economic considerations in the final CCP/EIS. The ROD documents our selection of Alternative C, for Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa Valley NWRs and Alternative D for Pahranagat NWR. Background The National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee) (Improvement Act), which amended the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, requires us to develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Notices plan for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with the Improvement Act. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES CCP Alternatives and Selected Alternative Both our draft and final CCP/EIS identified several major issues. To address those issues, we developed and evaluated three alternatives for managing Ash Meadows and Moapa Valley NWRs and four alternatives for managing Desert and Pahranagat NWRs. These alternatives are outlined in the final CCP/EIS Summary document available at https://www.fws.gov/ desertcomplex/ccp.htm. Our decision is to adopt Alternative C for Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa Valley NWRs and Alternative D for Pahranagat NWR, as described in the ROD. The ROD details the basis of our decision, which we made after considering the following: the impacts identified in Chapter 4 of the draft and final CCP/EIS; the results of public and other agency comments; how well the alternative addresses the relevant issues, concerns, and opportunities identified during the planning process; and other relevant factors, including fulfilling the purposes for which the wildlife refuges were established, contributing to the mission and goals of the NWRS, and statutory and regulatory guidance. We have determined that Alternative C for Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa Valley NWRs and Alternative D for Pahranagat NWR include the suite of activities that best achieve the stated purpose and need for action and the goals for each wildlife refuge presented in the final CCP/EIS Chapter 1. These alternatives were selected for implementation because they provide the greatest number of opportunities for the wildlife refuges to make a significant contribution to the conservation of fish, wildlife, and habitat needs in the region, balanced with opportunities for highquality wildlife-dependant recreation. VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:35 Jan 29, 2010 Jkt 220001 Dated: January 26, 2010. Ren Lohofener, Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Sacramento, California. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [FR Doc. 2010–2046 Filed 1–29–10; 8:45 am] 5115 Tissue Paper From China BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Temporary Concession Contract for Lake Mead National Recreation Area, AZ/NV AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior. ACTION: Notice of intention to award temporary concession contract for Lake Mead National Recreation Area. SUMMARY: Pursuant to 36 CFR 51.24, public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service intends to award a temporary concession contract for the conduct of certain visitor services within Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Arizona and Nevada for a term not to exceed 3 years. The visitor services include marina and boat rentals, overnight accommodations, food and beverage, retail, fuel, and short term trailer villages. This action is necessary to avoid interruption of visitor services. DATES: The term of the temporary concession contract will commence (if awarded) no earlier than February 1, 2010. The temporary concession contract is intended to be awarded to Forever Resorts, a qualified person (as defined in 36 CFR 51.3). The existing concessioner, Seven Resorts, Inc., has informed the National Park Service (NPS) that it will be concluding its operations at Echo Bay under CC– LAME010–71 within Lake Mead National Recreation Area effective January 31, 2010. The National Park Service has determined that a temporary concession contract is necessary in order to avoid interruption of visitor services and has taken all reasonable and appropriate steps to consider alternatives to avoid an interruption of visitor services. This action is issued pursuant to 36 CFR 51.24(a). This is not a request for proposals. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: January 5, 2010. Jonathan B. Jarvis, Director, National Park Service. [FR Doc. 2010–1861 Filed 1–29–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–53–M PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [Investigation No. 731–TA–1070B (Review)] AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of a five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on certain tissue paper products from China. SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain tissue paper products from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission; 1 to be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is March 3, 2010. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by April 16, 2010. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207), as most recently amended at 74 FR 2847 (January 16, 2009). DATES: Effective Date: February 1, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the 1 No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 10–5–210, expiration date June 30, 2011. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 20 (Monday, February 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5114-5115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R8-R-2009-N222; 80230-1265-0000-S3]


Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Clark, Lincoln, and Nye 
Counties, NV

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability: record of decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the 
availability of the record of decision (ROD) for the final 
Comprehensive Conservation Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (CCP/
EIS) for the Desert National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) Complex. We 
completed a thorough analysis of the environmental, social, and 
economic considerations and presented it in our final CCP/EIS, which we 
released to the public on August 19, 2009. The ROD documents our 
decision to adopt and implement the final CCP/EIS Alternative C, for 
Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa Valley NWRs and Alternative D for 
Pahranagat NWR.

DATES: The Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, signed the ROD on September 24, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the ROD and Final CCP/EIS 
by any of the following methods:
    Agency Web site: Download a copy of the documents at https://www.fws.gov/desertcomplex/ccp.htm.
    Electronic mail: fw8plancomments@fws.gov. Include ``Desert NWRC 
ROD'' in the subject line of the message.
    Mail: Mark Pelz, Chief, Refuge Conservation Planning, Pacific 
Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, W-
1832, Sacramento, CA 95825-1846.
    In person viewing or pickup: Copies of the ROD may be viewed at the 
Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 4701 North Torrey Pines, Las 
Vegas, NV 89130.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Martinez, Refuge Complex 
Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4701 North Torrey Pines, Las 
Vegas, NV 89130, phone (702) 515-5450 or Mark Pelz, Chief, Refuge 
Planning, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1832, Sacramento, CA, 95825; (916) 414-
6504 (phone); mark_pelz@fws.gov (e-mail).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Introduction

    With this notice, we finalize the CCP process for the Desert NWR 
Complex (Ash Meadows, Desert, Moapa Valley and Pahranagat NWRs). The 
CCP will guide us in managing and administering the four wildlife 
refuges for the next 15 years. We started this process in a Federal 
Register notice (67 FR 54229, August 21, 2002). We released the draft 
CCP/EIS to the public, announcing and requesting comments in a notice 
of availability in the Federal Register (73 FR 39979) on July 11, 2008. 
The public review period lasted 60 days. We announced the availability 
of the final CCP/EIS in the Federal Register (74 FR 41928) on August 
19, 2009.
    Ash Meadows NWR was established in 1984 under the authority of the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. It comprises 23,000 acres 
of spring-fed wetlands, mesquite bosques, and desert uplands that 
provide habitat for at least 24 plants and animal species found nowhere 
else in the world. The Wildlife Refuge is located 90 miles northwest of 
Las Vegas and 30 miles west of Pahrump.
    Desert NWR was originally established in 1936 by Executive Order 
No. 7373 and subsequently modified by Public Land Order 4079, for the 
protection, enhancement and maintenance of wildlife resources including 
bighorn sheep. Located just north of Las Vegas, Nevada, the 1.6 million 
acre Wildlife Refuge is the largest in the lower 48 States.
    The Moapa Valley NWR was established in 1979 under the authority of 
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, to secure habitat for 
the endangered Moapa dace. The Wildlife Refuge is located on 116 acres 
in northeastern Clark County. Due to its small size, fragile habitats, 
on-going habitat restoration work, and unsafe structures, the Wildlife 
Refuge is currently closed to the general public.
    The Pahranagat NWR was established in 1963, under the authority of 
the Migratory Bird Conservation Act, as amended, to protect habitat for 
migrating birds in the Pahranagat Valley. The 5,382 acre Wildlife 
Refuge consists of marshes, meadows, lakes, and upland desert habitat. 
It provides nesting, resting, and feeding areas for waterfowl, 
shorebirds, wading birds, and song birds including the endangered 
southwestern willow flycatcher.
    In accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40 CFR 
1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice announces the availability of the 
ROD for the final CCP/EIS for the Desert NWR Complex. We completed a 
thorough analysis of the environmental, social, and economic 
considerations in the final CCP/EIS. The ROD documents our selection of 
Alternative C, for Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa Valley NWRs and 
Alternative D for Pahranagat NWR.

Background

    The National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (16 
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Improvement Act), which amended the National 
Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, requires us to 
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for 
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year

[[Page 5115]]

plan for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission 
of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound 
principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal 
mandates, and our policies. In addition to outlining broad management 
direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify 
wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, 
including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and 
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will 
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with 
the Improvement Act.

CCP Alternatives and Selected Alternative

    Both our draft and final CCP/EIS identified several major issues. 
To address those issues, we developed and evaluated three alternatives 
for managing Ash Meadows and Moapa Valley NWRs and four alternatives 
for managing Desert and Pahranagat NWRs. These alternatives are 
outlined in the final CCP/EIS Summary document available at https://www.fws.gov/desertcomplex/ccp.htm.
    Our decision is to adopt Alternative C for Ash Meadows, Desert, and 
Moapa Valley NWRs and Alternative D for Pahranagat NWR, as described in 
the ROD. The ROD details the basis of our decision, which we made after 
considering the following: the impacts identified in Chapter 4 of the 
draft and final CCP/EIS; the results of public and other agency 
comments; how well the alternative addresses the relevant issues, 
concerns, and opportunities identified during the planning process; and 
other relevant factors, including fulfilling the purposes for which the 
wildlife refuges were established, contributing to the mission and 
goals of the NWRS, and statutory and regulatory guidance. We have 
determined that Alternative C for Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa Valley 
NWRs and Alternative D for Pahranagat NWR include the suite of 
activities that best achieve the stated purpose and need for action and 
the goals for each wildlife refuge presented in the final CCP/EIS 
Chapter 1. These alternatives were selected for implementation because 
they provide the greatest number of opportunities for the wildlife 
refuges to make a significant contribution to the conservation of fish, 
wildlife, and habitat needs in the region, balanced with opportunities 
for high-quality wildlife-dependant recreation.

    Dated: January 26, 2010.
Ren Lohofener,
Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2010-2046 Filed 1-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.