Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Clark, Lincoln, and Nye Counties, NV, 5114-5115 [2010-2046]
Download as PDF
5114
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Notices
we will assess the projected revenues
and expense of the business activities
we will authorize and estimate a fair
return to the new concessioner taking
into account applicable industry norms.
As part of this assessment, we will
calculate the cost to the new
concessioner of acquiring the existing
LSI (and any required new LSI
improvements). The minimum franchise
fee, accordingly, will reflect the
financial consequences of the proposed
alternative formula such that the
estimated reasonable opportunity for
profit to the new concessioner would be
projected to be the same whether the
new contract included the standard
formula or the proposed alternative
formula. The proposed alternative
formula will not lower the projected
returns to the new concessioner but will
reduce the speculative nature of LSI
value under the standard formula.
Please note that, in the interest of
time, the NPS may issue a prospectus
for the new contract in the near future
that incorporates the proposed
alternative formula. If consideration of
public comments in response to this
notice causes us to alter the proposed
alternative formula, we will amend the
prospectus accordingly before the
deadline for submission of proposals.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Daniel N. Wenk,
Deputy Director, Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–1864 Filed 1–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–53–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–R–2009–N222; 80230–1265–0000–
S3]
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Desert National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, Clark, Lincoln, and Nye
Counties, NV
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: record of
decision.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:35 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
availability of the record of decision
(ROD) for the final Comprehensive
Conservation Plan/Environmental
Impact Statement (CCP/EIS) for the
Desert National Wildlife Refuge (NWR)
Complex. We completed a thorough
analysis of the environmental, social,
and economic considerations and
presented it in our final CCP/EIS, which
we released to the public on August 19,
2009. The ROD documents our decision
to adopt and implement the final CCP/
EIS Alternative C, for Ash Meadows,
Desert, and Moapa Valley NWRs and
Alternative D for Pahranagat NWR.
DATES: The Regional Director, Pacific
Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, signed the ROD on
September 24, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain
copies of the ROD and Final CCP/EIS by
any of the following methods:
Agency Web site: Download a copy of
the documents at https://www.fws.gov/
desertcomplex/ccp.htm.
Electronic mail:
fw8plancomments@fws.gov. Include
‘‘Desert NWRC ROD’’ in the subject line
of the message.
Mail: Mark Pelz, Chief, Refuge
Conservation Planning, Pacific
Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, W–
1832, Sacramento, CA 95825–1846.
In person viewing or pickup: Copies of
the ROD may be viewed at the Desert
National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 4701
North Torrey Pines, Las Vegas, NV
89130.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Martinez, Refuge Complex
Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 4701 North Torrey Pines, Las
Vegas, NV 89130, phone (702) 515–5450
or Mark Pelz, Chief, Refuge Planning,
2800 Cottage Way, W–1832,
Sacramento, CA, 95825; (916) 414–6504
(phone); mark_pelz@fws.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for the Desert NWR Complex
(Ash Meadows, Desert, Moapa Valley
and Pahranagat NWRs). The CCP will
guide us in managing and administering
the four wildlife refuges for the next 15
years. We started this process in a
Federal Register notice (67 FR 54229,
August 21, 2002). We released the draft
CCP/EIS to the public, announcing and
requesting comments in a notice of
availability in the Federal Register (73
FR 39979) on July 11, 2008. The public
review period lasted 60 days. We
announced the availability of the final
CCP/EIS in the Federal Register (74 FR
41928) on August 19, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Ash Meadows NWR was established
in 1984 under the authority of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended. It comprises 23,000 acres of
spring-fed wetlands, mesquite bosques,
and desert uplands that provide habitat
for at least 24 plants and animal species
found nowhere else in the world. The
Wildlife Refuge is located 90 miles
northwest of Las Vegas and 30 miles
west of Pahrump.
Desert NWR was originally
established in 1936 by Executive Order
No. 7373 and subsequently modified by
Public Land Order 4079, for the
protection, enhancement and
maintenance of wildlife resources
including bighorn sheep. Located just
north of Las Vegas, Nevada, the 1.6
million acre Wildlife Refuge is the
largest in the lower 48 States.
The Moapa Valley NWR was
established in 1979 under the authority
of the Endangered Species Act of 1973,
as amended, to secure habitat for the
endangered Moapa dace. The Wildlife
Refuge is located on 116 acres in
northeastern Clark County. Due to its
small size, fragile habitats, on-going
habitat restoration work, and unsafe
structures, the Wildlife Refuge is
currently closed to the general public.
The Pahranagat NWR was established
in 1963, under the authority of the
Migratory Bird Conservation Act, as
amended, to protect habitat for
migrating birds in the Pahranagat
Valley. The 5,382 acre Wildlife Refuge
consists of marshes, meadows, lakes,
and upland desert habitat. It provides
nesting, resting, and feeding areas for
waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds,
and song birds including the
endangered southwestern willow
flycatcher.
In accordance with National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40
CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice
announces the availability of the ROD
for the final CCP/EIS for the Desert
NWR Complex. We completed a
thorough analysis of the environmental,
social, and economic considerations in
the final CCP/EIS. The ROD documents
our selection of Alternative C, for Ash
Meadows, Desert, and Moapa Valley
NWRs and Alternative D for Pahranagat
NWR.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Improvement Act),
which amended the National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of
1966, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Notices
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System
(NWRS), consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Improvement
Act.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
CCP Alternatives and Selected
Alternative
Both our draft and final CCP/EIS
identified several major issues. To
address those issues, we developed and
evaluated three alternatives for
managing Ash Meadows and Moapa
Valley NWRs and four alternatives for
managing Desert and Pahranagat NWRs.
These alternatives are outlined in the
final CCP/EIS Summary document
available at https://www.fws.gov/
desertcomplex/ccp.htm.
Our decision is to adopt Alternative C
for Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa
Valley NWRs and Alternative D for
Pahranagat NWR, as described in the
ROD. The ROD details the basis of our
decision, which we made after
considering the following: the impacts
identified in Chapter 4 of the draft and
final CCP/EIS; the results of public and
other agency comments; how well the
alternative addresses the relevant issues,
concerns, and opportunities identified
during the planning process; and other
relevant factors, including fulfilling the
purposes for which the wildlife refuges
were established, contributing to the
mission and goals of the NWRS, and
statutory and regulatory guidance. We
have determined that Alternative C for
Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa
Valley NWRs and Alternative D for
Pahranagat NWR include the suite of
activities that best achieve the stated
purpose and need for action and the
goals for each wildlife refuge presented
in the final CCP/EIS Chapter 1. These
alternatives were selected for
implementation because they provide
the greatest number of opportunities for
the wildlife refuges to make a significant
contribution to the conservation of fish,
wildlife, and habitat needs in the region,
balanced with opportunities for highquality wildlife-dependant recreation.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:35 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: January 26, 2010.
Ren Lohofener,
Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region,
Sacramento, California.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[FR Doc. 2010–2046 Filed 1–29–10; 8:45 am]
5115
Tissue Paper From China
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Temporary Concession Contract for
Lake Mead National Recreation Area,
AZ/NV
AGENCY: National Park Service,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intention to award
temporary concession contract for Lake
Mead National Recreation Area.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to 36 CFR 51.24,
public notice is hereby given that the
National Park Service intends to award
a temporary concession contract for the
conduct of certain visitor services
within Lake Mead National Recreation
Area, Arizona and Nevada for a term not
to exceed 3 years. The visitor services
include marina and boat rentals,
overnight accommodations, food and
beverage, retail, fuel, and short term
trailer villages. This action is necessary
to avoid interruption of visitor services.
DATES: The term of the temporary
concession contract will commence (if
awarded) no earlier than February 1,
2010.
The
temporary concession contract is
intended to be awarded to Forever
Resorts, a qualified person (as defined
in 36 CFR 51.3). The existing
concessioner, Seven Resorts, Inc., has
informed the National Park Service
(NPS) that it will be concluding its
operations at Echo Bay under CC–
LAME010–71 within Lake Mead
National Recreation Area effective
January 31, 2010.
The National Park Service has
determined that a temporary concession
contract is necessary in order to avoid
interruption of visitor services and has
taken all reasonable and appropriate
steps to consider alternatives to avoid
an interruption of visitor services.
This action is issued pursuant to 36
CFR 51.24(a). This is not a request for
proposals.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
January 5, 2010.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Director, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–1861 Filed 1–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–53–M
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1070B (Review)]
AGENCY: United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of a five-year review
concerning the antidumping duty order
on certain tissue paper products from
China.
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted a review
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act)
to determine whether revocation of the
antidumping duty order on certain
tissue paper products from China would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury. Pursuant
to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested
parties are requested to respond to this
notice by submitting the information
specified below to the Commission; 1 to
be assured of consideration, the
deadline for responses is March 3, 2010.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission by
April 16, 2010. For further information
concerning the conduct of this review
and rules of general application, consult
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207), as most recently amended at 74 FR
2847 (January 16, 2009).
DATES: Effective Date: February 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 10–5–210,
expiration date June 30, 2011. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 15
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436.
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 20 (Monday, February 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5114-5115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2046]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-R-2009-N222; 80230-1265-0000-S3]
Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Clark, Lincoln, and Nye
Counties, NV
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the record of decision (ROD) for the final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (CCP/
EIS) for the Desert National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) Complex. We
completed a thorough analysis of the environmental, social, and
economic considerations and presented it in our final CCP/EIS, which we
released to the public on August 19, 2009. The ROD documents our
decision to adopt and implement the final CCP/EIS Alternative C, for
Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa Valley NWRs and Alternative D for
Pahranagat NWR.
DATES: The Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, signed the ROD on September 24, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the ROD and Final CCP/EIS
by any of the following methods:
Agency Web site: Download a copy of the documents at https://www.fws.gov/desertcomplex/ccp.htm.
Electronic mail: fw8plancomments@fws.gov. Include ``Desert NWRC
ROD'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Mark Pelz, Chief, Refuge Conservation Planning, Pacific
Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, W-
1832, Sacramento, CA 95825-1846.
In person viewing or pickup: Copies of the ROD may be viewed at the
Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 4701 North Torrey Pines, Las
Vegas, NV 89130.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Martinez, Refuge Complex
Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4701 North Torrey Pines, Las
Vegas, NV 89130, phone (702) 515-5450 or Mark Pelz, Chief, Refuge
Planning, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1832, Sacramento, CA, 95825; (916) 414-
6504 (phone); mark_pelz@fws.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP process for the Desert NWR
Complex (Ash Meadows, Desert, Moapa Valley and Pahranagat NWRs). The
CCP will guide us in managing and administering the four wildlife
refuges for the next 15 years. We started this process in a Federal
Register notice (67 FR 54229, August 21, 2002). We released the draft
CCP/EIS to the public, announcing and requesting comments in a notice
of availability in the Federal Register (73 FR 39979) on July 11, 2008.
The public review period lasted 60 days. We announced the availability
of the final CCP/EIS in the Federal Register (74 FR 41928) on August
19, 2009.
Ash Meadows NWR was established in 1984 under the authority of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. It comprises 23,000 acres
of spring-fed wetlands, mesquite bosques, and desert uplands that
provide habitat for at least 24 plants and animal species found nowhere
else in the world. The Wildlife Refuge is located 90 miles northwest of
Las Vegas and 30 miles west of Pahrump.
Desert NWR was originally established in 1936 by Executive Order
No. 7373 and subsequently modified by Public Land Order 4079, for the
protection, enhancement and maintenance of wildlife resources including
bighorn sheep. Located just north of Las Vegas, Nevada, the 1.6 million
acre Wildlife Refuge is the largest in the lower 48 States.
The Moapa Valley NWR was established in 1979 under the authority of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, to secure habitat for
the endangered Moapa dace. The Wildlife Refuge is located on 116 acres
in northeastern Clark County. Due to its small size, fragile habitats,
on-going habitat restoration work, and unsafe structures, the Wildlife
Refuge is currently closed to the general public.
The Pahranagat NWR was established in 1963, under the authority of
the Migratory Bird Conservation Act, as amended, to protect habitat for
migrating birds in the Pahranagat Valley. The 5,382 acre Wildlife
Refuge consists of marshes, meadows, lakes, and upland desert habitat.
It provides nesting, resting, and feeding areas for waterfowl,
shorebirds, wading birds, and song birds including the endangered
southwestern willow flycatcher.
In accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40 CFR
1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice announces the availability of the
ROD for the final CCP/EIS for the Desert NWR Complex. We completed a
thorough analysis of the environmental, social, and economic
considerations in the final CCP/EIS. The ROD documents our selection of
Alternative C, for Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa Valley NWRs and
Alternative D for Pahranagat NWR.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Improvement Act), which amended the National
Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, requires us to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year
[[Page 5115]]
plan for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission
of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify
wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities available to the public,
including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Improvement Act.
CCP Alternatives and Selected Alternative
Both our draft and final CCP/EIS identified several major issues.
To address those issues, we developed and evaluated three alternatives
for managing Ash Meadows and Moapa Valley NWRs and four alternatives
for managing Desert and Pahranagat NWRs. These alternatives are
outlined in the final CCP/EIS Summary document available at https://www.fws.gov/desertcomplex/ccp.htm.
Our decision is to adopt Alternative C for Ash Meadows, Desert, and
Moapa Valley NWRs and Alternative D for Pahranagat NWR, as described in
the ROD. The ROD details the basis of our decision, which we made after
considering the following: the impacts identified in Chapter 4 of the
draft and final CCP/EIS; the results of public and other agency
comments; how well the alternative addresses the relevant issues,
concerns, and opportunities identified during the planning process; and
other relevant factors, including fulfilling the purposes for which the
wildlife refuges were established, contributing to the mission and
goals of the NWRS, and statutory and regulatory guidance. We have
determined that Alternative C for Ash Meadows, Desert, and Moapa Valley
NWRs and Alternative D for Pahranagat NWR include the suite of
activities that best achieve the stated purpose and need for action and
the goals for each wildlife refuge presented in the final CCP/EIS
Chapter 1. These alternatives were selected for implementation because
they provide the greatest number of opportunities for the wildlife
refuges to make a significant contribution to the conservation of fish,
wildlife, and habitat needs in the region, balanced with opportunities
for high-quality wildlife-dependant recreation.
Dated: January 26, 2010.
Ren Lohofener,
Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2010-2046 Filed 1-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P