Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Framework Adjustment 44, 5016-5032 [2010-2015]
Download as PDF
5016
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
• Facsimile (fax): 301–713–4060,
Attn: David Cottingham;
• Mail: Chief, Marine Mammal and
Sea Turtle Conservation Division,
NMFS, Office of Protected Resources,
1315 East West Highway, Silver Spring,
MD, 20910.
Instructions: No comments will be
posted for public viewing until after the
comment period has closed. All
comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov
without change. NMFS may elect not to
post comments that contain obscene or
threatening content. All Personal
Identifying Information (for example,
name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only. The
proposed rule and supporting
documents, including the biological
report, economic report, IRFA analysis,
and 4(b)(2) report, are also available
electronically at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/turtles/
leatherback.htm#documents.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
McNulty, NMFS, Office of Protected
Resources, 301–713–2322; Elizabeth
Petras, NMFS Southwest Region, 562–
980–3238; Steve Stone, NMFS
Northwest Region, 503–231–2317.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The dates,
times and locations of the hearings are
as follows:
1. Wednesday, February 17, 2010,
3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., Carlsbad, CA:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Carlsbad
Office, 6010 Hidden Valley Road,
Carlsbad, CA 92011; Conference Room
1.
2. Thursday, February 18, 2010, 3:00
p.m. to 5:00 p.m., San Jose, CA: San Jose
Marriott, 301 South Market Street, San
Jose, CA 95113; Blossom Hill Salons I
and II.
Special Accommodations
These hearings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Sara McNulty,
NMFS, Office of Protected Resources,
301–713–2322, at least five business
days prior to the hearing date.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: January 26, 2010.
Helen Golde,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–2004 Filed 1–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 0910051338–0034–01]
RIN 0648–AY29
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast Multispecies
Fishery; Framework Adjustment 44
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comment.
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to
implement measures in Framework
Adjustment 44 (FW 44) to the Northeast
Multispecies Fishery Management Plan
(FMP), and specifications for the FMP
for fishing years (FY) 2010–2012. FW 44
measures and specifications, if
approved, would be implemented in
conjunction with approved measures in
Amendment 16 to the FMP, as well as
with approved sector operations plans
authorized under the FMP. Specifically,
FW 44 would modify the Gulf of Maine
(GOM) cod and pollock trip limits
proposed in Amendment 16; provide
the Regional Administrator (RA)
authority to implement inseason trip
limits and/or differential day-at-sea
(DAS) counting for any groundfish stock
in order to prevent catch from exceeding
the Annual Catch Limit (ACL); and
specify Overfishing Levels (OFLs),
Acceptable Biological Catch levels
(ABCs), and ACLs for all 20 groundfish
stocks in the FMP for fishing years 2010
through 2012, as well as the Total
Allowable Catches (TACs) for
transboundary Georges Bank (GB)
stocks. NMFS also proposes in this rule,
pursuant to current Regional
Administratory authority under the
FMP, to allocate zero trips to the Closed
Area II Yellowtail Flounder Special
Access Program (SAP); limit the Eastern
U.S./Canada Haddock SAP to the use of
Category A DAS for common pool
vessels; delay the opening of the Eastern
U.S./Canada Management Area for trawl
vessels; and implement a GB yellowtail
flounder trip limit of 2,500 lb (1,125 kg).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Finally, this rule would make technical
corrections to proposed Amendment 16
regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received by
March 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by 0648–AY29, by any one of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Paper, disk, or CD–ROM
comments should be sent to Patricia A.
Kurkul, Regional Administrator,
National Marine Fisheries Service, 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930–2276. Mark the outside of the
envelope: ‘‘Comments on FW 44
Proposed Rule.’’
• Fax: (978) 281–9135, Attn: Tom
Warren
Instructions: No comments will be
posted for public viewing until after the
comment period has closed. All
comments received are part of the
public record and will generally be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
NMFS prepared an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), which is
contained in the Classification section
of this proposed rule. Copies of the
Environmental Assessment (EA)
prepared for this rule may be found at
the following internet address: https://
www.nero.noaa.gov/nero/regs/frdoc/10/
10MultiFW44EA.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Warren, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281–9347, fax (978) 281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the biennial adjustment process of the
FMP, the New England Fishery
Management Council (Council)
developed Amendment 16 to implement
a wide range of revisions to
management measures based on the
results of the most recent stock
assessment (Groundfish Assessment
Review Meeting; GARM III; August
2008). A notice of availability for
Amendment 16, including the Final
Environmental Impact Statement, as
submitted by the Council for review by
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary),
was published in the Federal Register
on October 23, 2009 (74 FR 54773). A
proposed rule for Amendment 16 was
published on December 31, 2009 (74 FR
69382). Based on GARM III estimates of
fishing mortality and stock size
(biomass) in 2007, and subsequent
estimates of fishing mortality,
Amendment 16 proposes a suite of
management measures to continue the
rebuilding of groundfish stocks; an
expanded sector management program;
and a process for biennial specification
of OFLs, ABCs, and ACLs. The analysis
accompanying Amendment 16 indicates
that the proposed management
measures would achieve these
objectives.
However, notwithstanding the
Amendment 16 analysis, NMFS, based
upon industry concerns regarding the
effectiveness of Amendment 16
common pool measures, requested that
the Council reconsider these measures
at its September 2009 meeting.
Specifically, industry expressed concern
that assumptions inherent in
Amendment 16 may be invalid, and
therefore the Amendment 16 proposed
measures may not be restrictive enough
to prevent the ACLs from being
exceeded (particularly for GOM cod and
pollock). In particular, industry
members noted that fishery participants
may modify their effort behavior, for
example by dropping out of sectors
prior to the start of the fishing year and
deciding to fish instead in the common
pool, if there is the perception that
common pool measures provide better
fishing opportunities than sectors.
Industry members also raised the
possibility that Amendment 16 trip
limit levels may result in over-harvest of
ACLs for these stocks. For example,
based on preliminary information, a
relatively large number of DAS may be
allocated to the common pool (3,601
DAS), compared to the relatively low
proposed GOM cod ACL for the
common pool (337 mt; 742,937 lb).
Moreover, the Amendment 16 trip limits
for GOM cod are relatively high, at
2,000 lb (907.2 kg)/DAS, up to 12,000 lb
(5,443.2 kg)/trip for GOM cod. As a
result of these allocations, it may be
possible for GOM cod ACL to be
exceeded by the common pool
participants. Based upon this concern,
and because it is not possible to
determine with certainty in advance
whether the analytical assumptions in
Amendment 16 will be determined to be
valid, the Council developed more
restrictive management measures in FW
44 at its November 2009 meeting.
The measures in and authority for FW
44 are based in large part on
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Amendment 16 being implemented. In
addition, FW 44 would modify
proposed Amendment 16 measures. For
that reason, if it is approved, FW 44
cannot be implemented until
Amendment 16 (if approved) becomes
effective. Moreover, FW 44 measures
also affect fishing activities of the many
new sector operations being proposed in
concurrent actions. If approved, FW 44
will become effective at the same time
and in conjunction with Amendment
16, and therefore would be in place
when new sector fishing operations
begin on May 1, 2010. FW 44 proposes
the following management measures
and specifications:
Management Measures
1. Regional Administrator Authority
Under FW 44, the NMFS RA,
Northeast Region, would be given the
authority to modify landing limits for
any Northeast (NE) multispecies stock
and/or DAS counting rates at any time
during the FY to reduce the likelihood
that ACLs of allocated NE multispecies
stocks would be exceeded, or to
facilitate the harvesting of ACLs. For
example, if, based on available
information regarding catch of a
particular stock, NMFS projects that the
ACL will be exceeded prior to the end
of the fishing year, the RA may
implement a more restrictive landing
limit for that stock that would be
effective for the remainder of the fishing
year, unless further modified.
Alternatively, for the same stock, the RA
could instead decide to implement a
more restrictive DAS counting rate in
the geographic area that pertains to the
stock (or implement a change to both a
possession limit and DAS counting
rate). A modification to the DAS
counting rate, under this example,
would apply to one or more of the
differential DAS counting areas
proposed in Amendment 16 that
correspond to the pertinent stock(s)
(e.g., Inshore GOM Differential DAS
Area; Offshore GOM Differential DAS
Area; Inshore GB Differential DAS Area;
Offshore GB Differential DAS Area; and
Southern New England/Mid-Atlantic
(SNE/MA) Differential DAS Area). This
inseason adjustment could be
implemented by the RA even on the first
day of the fishing year. Thus, beginning
in FY 2011, the RA could adjust the
inseason DAS counting rate, in addition
to the adjustment to the DAS counting
rate that would be triggered under
Amendment 16 as an accountability
measure (AM), in response to exceeding
an ACL during the previous FY.
Although NMFS is not proposing the
RA use this new authority at the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5017
beginning of FY 2010, NMFS is
nonetheless concerned that the ACLs for
certain stocks may be exceeded in FY
2010, which would trigger
accountability measures in FY 2011. To
address the concern for stocks such as
GOM winter flounder and GB cod
(stocks for which the proposed ACLs are
substantially less than recent catch
levels), NMFS will monitor catch rates
closely and be prepared to implement
effort restrictions early in FY 2010, if
necessary.
2. Modification to Amendment 16
Proposed Possession Limits
FW 44 would modify the proposed
Amendment 16 GOM cod trip limit and
replace it with the current, status quo
trip limit for GOM cod. Specifically, for
limited access DAS vessels, FW 44
would replace the proposed
Amendment 16 GOM cod limit of 2,000
lb (907.2 kg) up to 12,000 lb (5,443.2
kg)/trip, with the status quo GOM cod
trip limit of 800 lb (362.9 kg)/DAS, up
to 4,000 lb (1,818.4 kg)/trip. For vessels
with a limited access Handgear A or
open access Handgear B permit, FW 44
would also replace the proposed
Amendment 16 cod limits of 750 lb
(340.2 kg) and 200 lb (90.7 kg),
respectively, with the status quo trip
limits of 300 lb (136.1 kg) and 75 lb (34
kg) per trip. In addition, FW 44 would
implement a new trip limit for pollock
of 1,000 lb (453.6 kg)/DAS, up to 10,000
lb (4,536.0 kg)/trip. Currently there is no
trip limit for pollock, nor is there one
proposed in Amendment 16. The
proposed FW 44 trip limits are intended
to reduce the likelihood of exceeding
the GOM cod and pollock ACLs.
3. Requirement for Limited Access
Scallop Vessels To Land Yellowtail
Flounder
In conjunction with the allocations of
yellowtail flounder to the scallop
fishery (described below under
‘‘specifications’’), vessels with a Federal
limited access scallop permit are
required to land all legal-sized
yellowtail flounder to reduce
discarding. This provision may also
provide an incentive for scallop vessels
to minimize the catch of yellowtail
flounder, if landing yellowtail flounder
is not cost-effective.
Specifications
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C.
1361–1423h, requires ACLs to be
implemented in FY 2010 for stocks
determined to be subject to overfishing,
and in FY 2011 for all other stocks.
Amendment 16 proposes a biennial
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
5018
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
process for specification of ACLs (and
OFLs and ABCs) for all stocks as of FY
2010. Pursuant to the Amendment 16
proposed process, for FY 2010–2012 FW
44 would specify OFLs, ABCs, and
ACLs, as well as incidental catch TACs
for all stocks covered by the Northeast
Multispecies FMP. In addition, pursuant
to current FMP requirements, the
Council, in this rule, recommends
annual specifications of U.S./Canada
Management Area TACs. Therefore, as
described in further detail below, FW 44
proposes to specify U.S./Canada TACs;
delay the opening of the Eastern U.S./
Canada Management Area for trawl
vessels for FY 2010; allocate zero trips
for the CA II Yellowtail Flounder SAP,
limit the Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock
SAP to the use of Category A DAS for
common pool vessels, and implement a
GB yellowtail flounder trip limit of
2,500 lb (1,125 kg). The Regional
Administrator has authority to modify
management measures for the U.S./
Canada Management Area, as well as
modify certain SAP regulations.
FW 44 proposes the following
specifications:
1. OFLs and ABCs
Table 1 contains FW 44 proposed
OFLs and ABCs for FY 2010–2012,
based on GARM III stock assessments
(2008), for all stocks with the exception
of GB yellowtail flounder, for which the
ABC is based on the Transboundary
Resource Assessment Committee stock
assessment of 2009. It is anticipated that
the FY 2011 and 2012 values of the GB
yellowtail flounder ABC will be revised
during 2010 and 2011, respectively,
based on new transboundary stock
assessments. The OFLs and ABCs for FY
2012 will likely be revised during the
next biennial adjustment process
(during 2011), but are being specified at
this time in the event that the next
biennial adjustment process does not
result in the timely implementation of
revised 2012 catch specifications.
The OFL value for a stock is
calculated using the estimated stock size
for a particular year, and represents the
amount of catch associated with Fmsy,
i.e., the fishing mortality rate that, if
applied over the long term, would result
in maximum sustainable yield (MSY).
The ABCs are those recommended by
the Council’s Scientific and Statistical
Committee (SSC), and are lower than
the OFLs in order to take into account
scientific uncertainty in setting catch
limits. The ABC value for a stock is
calculated using the estimated stock size
for a particular year, and for all stocks,
with the exception of SNE/MA winter
flounder, represents the amount of catch
associated with 75 percent of Fmsy, or
the F rate required to rebuild the stock
within the defined rebuilding time
period (Frebuild), whichever is lower.
For SNE/MA winter flounder, the ABC
was calculated using the F expected to
result from management measures
designed to achieve an F as close to zero
as practicable. This ABC is consistent
with the SSC recommendation that for
stocks that cannot rebuild to Bmsy in
the specified rebuilding period, even
with no fishing, the ABC should be
based on incidental bycatch, including
a reduction in bycatch rate (i.e., the
proportion of the stock caught as
bycatch).
According to FW 44, for all stocks,
with the exception of those with indexbased stock assessments (where no
information was provided), the
probability that the ABC catch would
result in overfishing (F>Fmsy) is less
than 20 percent. The highest probability
of overfishing is associated with GB
winter flounder (0.184, 0.191, and 0.199
for 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively).
The ABC values for GB cod and GB
haddock for FY 2011 and 2012 are
maximum values, because no Canadian
catch has been deducted from the
overall ABC, and therefore will likely be
specified again in conjunction with the
2011 and 2012 U.S./Canada TACs. The
FY 2011 and 2012 U.S. ABCs for GB cod
and GB haddock will therefore be lower
than the values in Table 1 in order to
take into account Canadian catch. For
example, for FY 2010, the amount of
reduction to the overall ABC for GB cod
and GB haddock was 1,012 mt and
17,612 mt, respectively, which represent
the Canadian portion of the shared
TACs (Table 7).
TABLE 1—OVERFISHING LEVELS AND ACCEPTABLE BIOLOGICAL CATCHES FOR 2010–2012
OFL
U.S. ABC
** Stock
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
2010
GB cod .............................................................................
GOM cod ..........................................................................
GB hadk ...........................................................................
GOM hadk ........................................................................
GB ytail ............................................................................
SNE ytail ..........................................................................
CC ytail ............................................................................
Plaice ...............................................................................
Witch ................................................................................
GB winter .........................................................................
GOM winter ......................................................................
SNE winter .......................................................................
Redfish .............................................................................
White hake .......................................................................
Pollock ..............................................................................
N. window ........................................................................
S. window .........................................................................
Ocean pout ......................................................................
Halibut ..............................................................................
Wolffish ............................................................................
6,272
11,089
80,007
1,617
5,148
1,553
1,124
4,110
1,239
2,660
441
1,568
9,899
4,130
5,085
225
317
361
119
92
2011
2012
7,311
11,715
59,948
1,536
6,083
2,174
1,355
4,483
1,792
2,886
570
2,117
10,903
4,805
5,085
225
317
361
130
92
8,090
11,742
51,150
1,296
7,094
3,166
1,508
4,727
2,141
3,297
685
2,830
12,036
5,306
5,085
225
317
361
143
92
2010
3,800
8,530
44,903
1,265
1,200
493
863
3,156
994
2,052
238
644
7,586
2,832
3,293
169
237
271
71
83
2011
2012
* 5,616
9,012
* 46,784
1,206
1,081
687
1,041
3,444
1,369
2,224
238
897
8,356
3,295
3,293
169
237
271
78
83
* 6,214
9,018
* 39,846
1,013
1,226
1,003
1,159
3,632
1,639
2,543
238
1,198
9,224
3,638
3,293
169
237
271
85
83
** GB = Georges Bank; GOM = Gulf of Maine; hadk = haddock; ytail = yellowtail flounder; SNE = Southern New England/Mid-Atlantic; CC =
Cape Cod/GOM; plaice = American plaice; witch = witch flounder; winter = winter flounder; N = north; S = south; window = windowpane flounder.
* Preliminary.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
2. ACLs
Pursuant to Magnuson-Stevens Act
requirements and Amendment 16, the
Council recommended ACLs that are
lower than the ABCs, in order to
account for management uncertainty.
The total ACL for a stock represents the
catch limit for a particular year,
considering both biological and
management uncertainty, and the limit
includes all sources of catch (landed
and discards) and all fisheries
(commercial and recreational
groundfish fishery, state-waters catch,
and non-groundfish fisheries). The
division of a single ABC value for each
stock (for a particular FY) into subACLs, and ACL-subcomponents,
accomplishes three objectives: (1) The
ABC is sub-divided to account for all
components of the fishery and sources
of fishing mortality; (2) allocations are
made for certain fisheries; and (3)
management uncertainty is taken into
account.
For FW 44 the ABC was sub-divided
into fishery components on a stockspecific manner, prior to the
consideration of management
uncertainty. The following components
of the fishery are reflected in the total
ABC: Canadian share/allowance
(expected Canadian catch); U.S. ABC
(available to the U.S. fishery after
accounting for Canadian catch); state
waters (portion of ABC expected to be
caught from state waters outside Federal
management); other sub-components
(expected catch by other non-groundfish
fisheries); scallop fishery; mid-water
trawl fishery; commercial groundfish
fishery; and recreational groundfish
fishery. The commercial groundfish subACL is further divided into the nonsector (common pool vessels) sub-ACL
and the sector sub-ACL, based on the
total vessel enrollment in all sectors as
of September 1, 2009, and the
cumulative Potential Sector
Contributions (PSCs) associated with
those sectors, as explained in
Amendment 16 and the proposed rule
for sector operations in FY 2010.
As indicated in the proposed rule for
sector operations for FY 2010 (74 FR
68015, December 22, 2009), sector
rosters will not be finalized until May
1, 2010, because sectors have until April
30, 2010, to drop out of a sector and fish
in the common pool. Therefore, it is
likely that the FY 2010 sector sub-ACL,
which is comprised of the cumulative
PSCs of all enrolled sector members,
will be reduced and the common pool
sub-ACL will increase after publication
of the final rule specifying ACLs.
Despite such changes, the groundfish
sub-ACL (common pool sub-ACL plus
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
the sector sub-ACL) would not change.
Based on the final rosters, NMFS
intends to publish a rule in early May
2010 to modify these sub-ACLs, and
notify the public if these numbers
change. It is almost certain that all of the
FY 2011 and 2012 sub-ACLs for the
common pool and sectors will change
and be re-specified prior to FY 2011 and
2012 due to likely annual changes to the
sector rosters. Furthermore, due to the
need to re-specify the U.S. ABCs for GB
cod and GB haddock as described
above, all sub-components of the ABCs
for GB cod and GB haddock will be respecified for FY 2011 and 2012, when
information on the Canadian TACs is
available.
The numbers in this proposed rule are
based on the sector rosters submitted to
NMFS as of September 1, 2009, as
indicated in the EA. In contrast, the
proposed Annual Catch Entitlements
(ACE) for sectors are based on rosters as
of November 30, 2009. The average
difference in the common pool subACLs between this proposed rule and
the sector proposed rule is 36 percent.
The common pool sub-ACLs in the
sector proposed rule are lower than in
this proposed rule due to an increase in
sector members between September 1
and November 30, 2009.
The concept of management
uncertainty for the purpose of
developing ACLs in Amendment 16,
was characterized as the likelihood that
management measures will result in a
level of catch that is greater than the
catch objective. In FW 44, management
uncertainty was evaluated for each
stock, considering the following
elements of the fishery and the FMP:
enforceability; monitoring adequacy;
precision of management tools; latent
effort; and catch of groundfish in nongroundfish fisheries. For most stocks
and components of the fishery (ABC
components), the default adjustment
(reduction) to the catch level for a
fishery component was 5 percent. For
stocks with less management
uncertainty, the adjustment was 3
percent, and for those stocks or
components with more management
uncertainty, the adjustment was 7
percent.
For example, the 2010 pollock ABC
set by the SSC was 3,813 mt. Excluding
the estimated Canadian pollock catch of
520 mt, the U.S. ABC in 2010 for
pollock amounts to 3,293 mt (Table 1).
Approximately 6 percent of the U.S.
ABC is used to account for anticipated
state-waters catch (200 mt), 6 percent
accounts for anticipated pollock catch
by non-groundfish fisheries (other subcomponents), and the remaining 2,893
mt is allocated to the groundfish fishery
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5019
(3,293 ¥ 200 ¥ 200 = 2,893 mt). To
account for management uncertainty,
this amount was reduced by 5 percent
(144 mt) from 2,893 mt,, resulting in a
groundfish sub-ACL of 2,748 mt (2,893
¥ 144 = 2,748 mt) (Table 3).
Several components of the FW 44
ABCs are notable, because they are
atypical. For example, an allocation of
yellowtail flounder to the scallop
fishery is proposed in recognition of the
importance of yellowtail flounder to the
prosecution of the scallop fishery. For
FY 2010, the scallop fishery would be
allocated 100 percent of the estimated
yellowtail flounder (for GB and CC/
GOM stocks) that is associated with the
projected scallop catch in FY 2010,
although this allocation is not a ‘‘hard’’
TAC. For FY 2011 and 2012, NMFS
proposes in FW 44 to allocate to the
scallop fishery 90 percent of the
yellowtail flounder the scallop fishery is
projected to catch (Table 2). Allocating
to the scallop fishery only 90 percent of
the yellowtail flounder that the fishery
is expected to catch is intended to
incentivize the scallop fishermen to
reduce its bycatch of yellowtail
flounder.
At the January 27, 2010 Council
meeting, the Council is expected to
review and possibly reconsider
Framework Adjustment 21 (FW 21) to
the Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP (FW 21),
which includes measures that determine
the amount of scallops that would be
caught during FY 2010. Because the FW
44 yellowtail flounder allocation to the
scallop fishery is based on the amount
of projected scallop harvest, a
modification to FW 21 could affect the
proposed FW 44 allocation of yellowtail
flounder to both the scallop and the NE
multispecies fisheries. The outcome of
the Council’s January 2010, review of
FW 21 is unknown at the time this
document was going to publication.
However, even if the yellowtail flounder
allocations are not changed in FW 44, a
modification of the scallop management
program could change the impacts of
the yellowtail flounder allocations, such
that they are different than analyzed in
the FW 44 EA.
The FW 44 EA contains a brief
discussion of the potential effects on the
environment, including the human
environment, of modifying the scallop
management program. If necessary, the
FW 44 EA will be revised by including
supplemental analyses, and the FW 44
final rule would reflect the revised
specifications. For FY 2010, a change in
the Scallop FMP that would allow
additional scallop effort, and a
recommendation for a larger allocation
of yellowtail flounder, would result in
increased revenue to the scallop fishery
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
5020
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
due to the additional yellowtail landed
by scallop vessels. Conversely, with
respect to the groundfish fishery,
allocating additional yellowtail flounder
to the scallop fleet would result in lost
revenue for the NE multispecies fishery.
Based on FW 21 information, the total
amount of GB and SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder allocated to the scallop fishery
could be up to 146 mt and 135 mt,
respectively. These amounts would
increase, by 36 mt and 24 mt for GB and
SNE/MA yellowtail, respectively the
currently proposed allocations to the
scallop fishery. The EA estimates that
the value of each metric ton of
yellowtail flounder to the NE
multispecies fishery ranges from a low
of $3,296 to a high of $41,176. Further,
the specified allocations of yellowtail
flounder for the scallop fishery may be
revised for FY 2011 or 2012, based on
updated scallop and yellowtail flounder
stock information, or on future scallop
fishery access area measures.
No specific allocation of CC/GOM
yellowtail flounder would be made to
the scallop fishery because the
incidental catches of this stock by the
scallop fishery are relatively low.
Catches of this stock will be considered
part of the ‘‘other sub-component’’ of the
ACL.
The FY 2010 yellowtail flounder
allocations to the scallop fishery are
characterized as ACL sub-components
(no short-term associated AMs), and the
FY 2011 and 2012 allocations are
characterized as sub-ACLs. Under the
current Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP, if the
scallop fishery harvests in excess of the
yellowtail flounder sub-components
specified for the fishery for FY 2010
(110 mt and 111 mt for GB and SNE/
MA, respectively), no scallop
management measures will be triggered.
The Council has decided to develop
AMs for the Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP
that would be responsive to yellowtail
flounder catches in excess of the subACL, beginning in FY 2011. The precise
mechanism and scope of future scallop
AMs, is unknown. Current regulations
set a cap on the amount of yellowtail
flounder that may be harvested from the
scallop access areas from the SNE/MA
and GB yellowtail flounder stock areas.
Specifically, current regulations cap
yellowtail flounder harvest from scallop
access areas at 10 percent of the ‘‘total
TAC’’ for each of the stock areas. In light
of the proposed ACL components, ‘‘total
TAC’’ means ‘‘total ACL’’, i.e., 10 percent
of 1,169 mt (117 mt) and 468 mt (47 mt)
for FY 2010 for GB and SNE/MA
yellowtail flounder, respectively (see
Table 3).
Under this action, the mid-water trawl
fishery would be allocated 0.2 percent
of the U.S. ABC for GB and GOM
haddock. The values for the allocations
to the mid-water trawl fishery listed in
Table 2 are slightly less than 0.2
percent, due to the 7 percent reduction
of these allocations to account for
management uncertainty for this stock.
To determine the mid-water trawl
fishery’s allocation of GB haddock,
therefore, the ABC of 44,903 mt was
multiplied by 0.002, and then reduced
by 6.3 mt (44,903 mt X .002 = 89.8 mt;
89.8 mt ¥6.3 mt = 83.5 mt). For GOM
haddock, the ABC of 1,265 mt was
multiplied by 0.002, and then reduced
by 0.18 (1,265 mt X .002 = 2.53 mt; 2.53
mt ¥0.18 mt = 2.4 mt). All the haddock
allocations to the mid-water trawl
fishery are characterized as sub-ACLs
(associated with AMs, as explained
below). A percentage of the U.S. ABC
for GOM haddock and GOM cod would
be allocated to the recreational fishery,
based on a split of ABC among
commercial and recreational
components of the fishery (72.5 percent
and 27.5 percent for haddock; 66.3
percent and 33.7 percent for cod,
respectively)(Table 2). All the
recreational allocations to the
groundfish fishery are characterized as
sub-ACLs.
TABLE 2—ALLOCATIONS TO THE SCALLOP FISHERY, MID-WATER TRAWL FISHERY, AND RECREATIONAL GROUNDFISH
FISHERY (MT)
FY 2010
FY 2011
FY 2012
Scallop Fishery
Yellowtail flounder stock:
GB .............................................................................................................................
SNE/MA ....................................................................................................................
110
111
197
80
308
126
84
2
87
2
74
2
2,673
324
2,824
308
2,826
259
Mid-Water Trawl Fishery
Haddock stock:
GB .............................................................................................................................
GOM .........................................................................................................................
Recreational Groundfish Fishery
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
GOM stock:
GOM cod ..................................................................................................................
GOM haddock ..........................................................................................................
For most stocks the percentage of the
ABC deducted for anticipated catch
from state waters is between 1 and 10
percent, with the exception of Atlantic
halibut and GOM winter flounder, for
which 50 percent and 35 percent,
respectively, are deducted from the
ABC.
Amendment 16 would implement a
system in which a sub-ACL has an AM
that would be triggered if the catch
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
exceeds the specified amount. In
contrast, an ACL-subcomponent does
not have an automatic short-term AM
that is triggered if the catch exceeds the
specified amount, although there would
be accountability through the evaluation
of the catch of all sub-components
during the next biennial adjustment to
determine if the size of the ACLsubcomponents needs to be adjusted for
subsequent fishing years. However, if
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the total catch exceeds the total ACL,
AMs would be triggered, as explained in
detail in the Amendment 16 proposed
rule. Tables 3, 4, and 5 contain the total
ACLs, sub-ACLs, and ACLsubcomponents for FY 2010, 2011, and
2012, respectively (with the exception
of the scallop and mid-water trawl
components in Table 2). The sector subACLs for five stocks are zero, because no
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
5021
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
possession of these stocks is allowed for
either common-pool or sector vessels.
TABLE 3—TOTAL ACLS, SUB-ACLS, AND ACL-SUBCOMPONENTS FOR FY 2010 (MT) *
Stock
Total ACL
GB cod .....................................................
GOM cod ..................................................
GB hadk ...................................................
GOM hadk ................................................
GB ytail ....................................................
SNE ytail ..................................................
CC ytail ....................................................
Plaice .......................................................
Witch ........................................................
GB winter .................................................
GOM winter ..............................................
SNE winter ...............................................
Redfish .....................................................
White hake ...............................................
Pollock ......................................................
N. window ................................................
S. window .................................................
Ocean pout ..............................................
Halibut ......................................................
Wolffish ....................................................
3,620
8,088
42,768
1,197
1,169
468
822
3,006
899
1,955
230
605
7,226
2,697
3,148
161
225
253
69
77
Groundfish
sub-ACL
Preliminary
common-pool
sub-ACL
3,430
7,240
40,440
1,149
999
322
779
2,848
852
1,852
158
520
6,848
2,566
2,748
110
154
239
30
73
Preliminary
sector
sub-ACL
174
337
1,127
39
65
91
52
184
42
55
26
520
234
121
118
110
154
239
30
73
State waters
ACL-subcomponent
3,256
4,230
39,313
786
934
241
727
2,665
810
1,797
132
0
6,613
2,435
2,630
0
0
0
0
0
38
566
449
9
0
5
9
32
9
0
60
53
76
28
200
2
2
3
36
1
Other ACLsubcomponents
152
283
1,796
37
60
20
35
126
38
103
12
32
303
113
200
49
69
11
4
3
* See Table 2 for allocations to scallop, mid-water trawl, and recreational fisheries.
TABLE 4—TOTAL ACLS, SUB-ACLS, AND ACL-SUBCOMPONENTS FOR FY 2011 (MT) *
Stock
Total ACL
GB cod .....................................................
GOM cod ..................................................
GB hadk ...................................................
GOM hadk ................................................
GB ytail ....................................................
SNE ytail ..................................................
CC ytail ....................................................
Plaice .......................................................
Witch ........................................................
GB winter .................................................
GOM winter ..............................................
SNE winter ...............................................
Redfish .....................................................
White hake ...............................................
Pollock ......................................................
N. window ................................................
S. window .................................................
Ocean pout ..............................................
Halibut ......................................................
Wolffish ....................................................
5,349
8,545
44,560
1,141
1,050
641
992
3,280
1,304
2,118
230
842
7,959
3,138
3,148
161
225
253
76
77
Groundfish
sub-ACL
Preliminary
common-pool
sub-ACL
5,068
7,649
42,134
1,095
799
527
940
3,108
1,236
2,007
158
726
7,541
2,566
2,974
110
154
239
33
73
Preliminary
sector
sub-ACL
257
356
1,174
37
52
144
63
200
61
60
26
726
257
141
118
110
154
239
33
73
State waters
ACL-subcomponent
4,812
4,469
40,959
749
747
383
867
2,908
1,174
1,948
132
0
7,284
2,833
2,630
0
0
0
0
0
56
597
468
9
0
7
10
34
14
0
60
72
84
33
200
2
2
3
39
1
Other ACLsubcomponents
225
299
1,871
35
54
27
42
138
55
111
12
45
334
132
200
49
69
11
4
3
* See Table 2 for allocations to scallop, mid-water trawl and recreational fisheries.
TABLE 5—TOTAL ACLS, SUB-ACLS, AND ACL-SUBCOMPONENTS FOR FY 2012 (MT) *
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
Stock
Total ACL
GB cod .....................................................
GOM cod ..................................................
GB hadk ...................................................
GOM hadk ................................................
GB ytail ....................................................
SNE ytail ..................................................
CC ytail ....................................................
Plaice .......................................................
Witch ........................................................
GB winter .................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
5,919
8,551
37,952
959
1,191
936
1,104
3,459
1,561
2,422
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Groundfish
sub-ACL
Preliminary
common-pool
sub-ACL
5,608
7,654
35,885
920
822
760
1,046
3,278
1,479
2,295
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Preliminary
sector
sub-ACL
284
356
1,000
31
53
208
70
211
73
68
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
5,324
4,472
34,885
630
769
552
976
3,067
1,406
2,227
01FEP1
State waters
ACL-subcomponent
62
598
398
7
0
10
12
36
16
0
Other ACLsubcomponents
249
299
1,594
29
61
40
46
145
66
127
5022
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 5—TOTAL ACLS, SUB-ACLS, AND ACL-SUBCOMPONENTS FOR FY 2012 (MT) *—Continued
Stock
Total ACL
GOM winter ..............................................
SNE winter ...............................................
Redfish .....................................................
White hake ...............................................
Pollock ......................................................
N. window ................................................
S. window .................................................
Ocean pout ..............................................
Halibut ......................................................
Wolffish ....................................................
230
1,125
8,786
3,465
3,148
161
225
253
83
77
Groundfish
sub-ACL
Preliminary
common-pool
sub-ACL
158
969
8,325
3,283
2,748
110
154
239
36
73
Preliminary
sector
sub-ACL
26
969
284
156
118
110
154
239
36
73
State waters
ACL-subcomponent
132
0
8,041
3,128
2,630
0
0
0
0
0
Other ACLsubcomponents
60
96
92
36
200
2
2
3
43
1
12
60
369
146
200
49
69
11
4
3
* See Table 2 for allocations to scallop, mid-water trawl, and recreational fisheries.
3. Revisions to Incidental Catch TACs
and Allocations to Special Management
Programs
This proposed rule specifies
incidental catch TACs applicable to the
NE multispecies Special Management
Programs for FY 2010–2012, based on
the proposed ACLs and the FMP.
Incidental catch TACs are specified for
certain stocks of concern for common
pool vessels fishing in the Special
Management Programs, in order to limit
the amount of catch of stocks of concern
that can be caught under such programs.
A stock of concern is defined as a stock
that is in an overfished condition or
subject to overfishing. The Incidental
Catch TACs proposed below are
consistent with the proposed
Amendment 16 changes to the
allocation of incidental catch TACs
among Special Management Programs.
Pursuant to Amendment 16, new
incidental catch TACs are required for
GOM winter flounder and pollock,
because they are now considered stocks
of concern. Although American plaice is
technically no longer a stock of concern,
Amendment 16 retains the incidental
catch TAC for this stock because the
stock is far from rebuilt. The incidental
catch TACs apply to catch (landings and
discards) caught under Category B DAS
(either Regular or Reserve B DAS) on
trips that end on a Category B DAS. The
catch of stocks for which incidental
catch TACs are specified on trips that
start under a Category B DAS and then
flip to a Category A DAS do not accrue
toward such TACs. Due to the need to
re-specify the U.S. ABC for GB cod, as
described above, the incidental catch
TAC for GB cod will be re-specified for
FY 2011 and 2012, when information on
the Canadian TACs are available. The
incidental catch TACs by stock based on
the common pool sub-ACL are shown in
Table 6 below.
TABLE 6—INCIDENTAL CATCH TACS BY STOCK FOR FY 2010–2012 (MT)
Percentage of
sub-ACL
Stock
GB cod .....................................................................................
GOM cod .................................................................................
GB yellowtail ............................................................................
CC/GOM yellowtail ..................................................................
SNE/MA yellowtail ...................................................................
Plaice .......................................................................................
Witch flounder ..........................................................................
SNE/MA winter flounder ..........................................................
GB winter .................................................................................
White hake ...............................................................................
Pollock .....................................................................................
2010 incidental
catch TAC
2
1
2
1
1
5
5
1
2
2
2
2011 incidental
catch TAC
3.5
3.4
1.3
0.5
0.9
9.2
2.1
5.2
1.1
2.4
2.4
2012 incidental
catch TAC
5.1
3.6
1.0
0.6
1.4
10.0
3.1
7.3
1.2
2.8
2.4
5.7
3.6
1.1
0.7
2.1
10.6
3.7
9.7
1.4
3.1
2.4
TABLE 7—ALLOCATION OF INCIDENTAL CATCH TACS AMONG SPECIAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS
Regular B
DAS program
%
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
Stock
Closed area I
hook gear
haddock SAP
%
Eastern U.S./
Canada haddock SAP
%
50
100
50
100
100
100
100
100
50
100
50
16
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
16
34
na
50
na
na
na
na
na
50
na
34
GB cod .........................................................................................................................................
GOM cod .....................................................................................................................................
GB yellowtail ................................................................................................................................
CC/GOM yellowtail ......................................................................................................................
SNE/MA yellowtail .......................................................................................................................
Plaice ...........................................................................................................................................
Witch flounder ..............................................................................................................................
SNE/MA winter flounder ..............................................................................................................
GB winter .....................................................................................................................................
White hake ...................................................................................................................................
Pollock .........................................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
5023
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 8—INCIDENTAL CATCH TACS FOR SPECIAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS BY STOCK FOR FY 2010–2012 (MT)
Stock
Regular B DAS program
2010
GB cod ...........................................................
GOM cod ........................................................
GB yellowtail ..................................................
CC/GOM yellowtail .........................................
SNE/MA yellowtail ..........................................
Plaice ..............................................................
Witch flounder ................................................
SNE/MA winter flounder .................................
GB winter .......................................................
White hake .....................................................
Pollock ............................................................
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
6. Annual Specifications for U.S./
Canada Management Area
The FMP specifies a procedure for
setting annual hard TAC levels (i.e., the
fishery or area closes when a TAC is
reached) for Eastern GB cod, Eastern GB
haddock, and GB yellowtail flounder in
the U.S./Canada Management Area. The
regulations governing the annual
development of TACs were authorized
by Amendment 13 to the FMP in order
to be consistent with the U.S./Canada
Resource Sharing Understanding
(Understanding), which is an informal
understanding between the Northeast
Region of NMFS and the Maritimes
Region of the Department of Fisheries
and Ocean of Canada (DFO) that
outlines a process for the management
of the shared GB groundfish resources.
The Understanding specifies an
allocation of TAC for these three stocks
for each country, based on a formula
that considers historical catch
percentages and current resource
distribution.
Annual TACs are determined through
a process involving the Council, the
Transboundary Management Guidance
Committee (TMGC), and the U.S./
Canada Transboundary Resources
Steering Committee. In September 2009,
the TMGC approved the 2009 Guidance
Document for Eastern GB cod and
Eastern GB haddock, which included
recommended U.S. TACs for these
stocks. Although the TMGC also
approved the Guidance Document for
GB yellowtail flounder, the TMGC was
not able to agree on a shared TAC for
GB yellowtail flounder.
The U.S. delegation proposed 1,500
mt for the shared GB yellowtail flounder
TAC, based on the SSC
recommendation. The Canadians
supported a larger shared TAC of 2,700
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
2011
1.7
3.4
0.6
0.5
0.9
9.2
2.1
1.1
1.2
5.2
1.2
Closed area I hook gear
haddock SAP
2012
2.6
3.6
0.5
0.6
1.4
10.0
3.1
1.2
1.4
7.3
1.2
2.8
3.6
0.5
0.7
2.1
10.6
3.7
1.4
1.6
9.7
1.2
2010
2011
2012
2010
2011
2012
0.6
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
0.4
0.8
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
0.4
0.9
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
0.4
1.2
..............
0.6
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
1.2
..............
0.8
1.7
..............
0.5
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
1.4
..............
0.8
1.9
..............
0.5
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
1.6
..............
0.8
m. Due to the Magnuson-Stevens Act
and FMP rebuilding plan for GB
yellowtail flounder, the United States
was constrained to the lower level it
proposed, and the TMGC was unable to
reach a consensus on an appropriate
shared catch for GB yellowtail, and
acknowledged this lack of consensus.
The recommended FY 2010 TACs
were based on the most recent stock
assessments (TRAC Status Reports for
2009), and the fishing mortality strategy
shared by NMFS, the Department of
Fisheries and DFO. The shared strategy
has two parts: (1) To maintain a low to
neutral (less than 50-percent) risk of
exceeding the F limit reference (Fref =
0.18, 0.26, and 0.25 for cod, haddock,
and yellowtail flounder, respectively);
and (2) when stock conditions are poor,
F should be further reduced to promote
rebuilding.
The TMGC concluded that the most
appropriate combined U.S./Canada TAC
for Eastern GB cod for FY 2010 is 1,350
mt. A 2010 TAC of 1,350 mt
corresponds to the average of the
pertinent two models for a neutral (50percent) risk of biomass decline. This
corresponds to a low risk (less than 25percent) or neutral risk (50-percent) of
exceeding the Fref of 0.18 (i.e., Fmsy) in
FY 2010. The annual allocation shares
between countries for FY 2010 are based
on a combination of historical catches
(10 percent weighting) and resource
distribution based on trawl surveys (90
percent weighting). Combining these
factors entitles the United States to 25
percent of the shared TAC and Canada
to 75-percent, resulting in a quota of 338
mt for the United States and 1,012 mt
for Canada.
For Eastern GB haddock, the TMGC
concluded that the most appropriate
combined U.S./Canada TAC for FY 2010
is 29,600 mt. While this technically
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Eastern U.S./Canada
haddock SAP
Sfmt 4702
corresponds to the risk-neutral level (of
exceeding F ref of 0.26), which assumes
the entire TAC will be caught in FY
2009, realistically, it represents a low to
neutral risk level, because the
anticipated catch in FY 2009 will likely
be less than the TAC. The annual
allocation share recommendations
between countries for FY 2010 are based
on a combination of historical catches
(10-percent weighting) and resource
distribution based on trawl surveys (90percent weighting). Combining these
factors results in recommended
allocations of 40.5 percent of the shared
TAC to the United States, and 59.5
percent to Canada, or a quota of 11,988
mt for the U.S. and 17,612 mt for
Canada.
On September 23, 2009, the Council
approved, consistent with the 2009
Guidance Document, the following U.S.
TACs recommended by the TMGC: 338
mt of Eastern GB cod and 11,988 mt of
Eastern GB haddock. The Council
recommended a U.S. TAC of 1,200 mt
for GB yellowtail, based upon the SSC
recommendation of 1,500 mt, minus the
anticipated Canadian catch, estimated at
300 mt. The 300 mt is approximately the
3-year average of Canadian catch (2008,
2007, 2006; 151 mt, 132 mt, 590 mt,
respectively), based upon TMGC
information. The FY 2010 TACs for the
U.S./Canada Management Area
represent substantial decreases for cod
(36 percent) and yellowtail flounder (43
percent), and an increase for haddock,
compared to the FY 2009 TACs for those
species. The final GB yellowtail
flounder sub-ACL proposed for the
groundfish fishery (999 mt; Table 3) is
lower than the 1,200-mt U.S. TAC, as
discussed above, due to the allocation to
the scallop fishery and consideration of
management uncertainty.
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
5024
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 9—2010 U.S./CANADA TACS (MT) AND PERCENTAGE SHARES
[In parentheses]
Eastern GB
Cod
Total Shared TAC ......................................................................................................
U.S. TAC ....................................................................................................................
Canada TAC ..............................................................................................................
1,350
338 (25%)
1,012 (75%)
Eastern GB
Haddock
29,600
11,988 (40.5%)
17,612 (59.5%)
* GB Yellowtail
Flounder
1,500
1,200
na
* Developed unilaterally by the Council.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
The regulations related to the
Understanding, promulgated by the
final rule implementing Amendment 13,
state that ‘‘any overages of the GB cod,
haddock, or yellowtail flounder TACs
that occur in a given fishing year will
be subtracted from the respective TAC
in the following fishing year.’’ Therefore,
if an analysis of the catch of the shared
stocks by U.S. vessels indicates that an
over-harvest occurred during FY 2009,
the pertinent components of the ACL
would be adjusted downward in order
to be consistent with the FMP and
Understanding (including the scallop
ACL-subcomponent for GB yellowtail
flounder). Although it is very unlikely,
it is possible that a very large overharvest could result in an adjusted TAC
of zero. If an adjustment to one of the
FY 2010 TACs of cod, haddock, or
yellowtail flounder is necessary, it will
be done consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act and the
fishing industry will also be notified.
7. U.S./Canada Management Area
Initial Measures for FY 2010.
NMFS also proposes to implement, in
conjunction with FW 44, and using
existing authority granted to the
Regional Administrator under the FMP,
measures to optimize the harvest of the
transboundary stocks managed under
the Understanding . The regulations in
50 CFR 648.85(a)(3)(iv)(D) provide the
RA the authority to implement inseason
adjustments to various measures in
order to prevent over-harvesting, or to
facilitate achieving the TAC.
Although this measure is not included
in FW 44, pursuant to the authority
cited above, the Council in November
2009 voted to direct the RA to postpone
the opening of the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area for both sector and non-sector
vessels fishing with trawl gear in FY
2010 from May 1, 2010 to August 1,
2010. Therefore, this action proposes
such a delay. The objective of this
measure is to prevent trawl fishing in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area during the
time period when cod bycatch is likely
to be very high, and to prolong access
to this area in order to maximize the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
catch of available cod, haddock, and
yellowtail flounder. To further constrain
fishing mortality on GB cod, NMFS
proposes that, in a manner similar to
FYs 2008 and 2009, common pool
vessels fishing with non-trawl gear in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area prior to
August 1, 2010, be limited to a cod
catch of 5 percent of the Eastern GB cod
TAC, or 16.9 mt of cod. This measure
was successful in FYs 2008 and 2009 in
slowing the annual catch rate of cod
during the early part of the year.
Second, NMFS is proposing to
implement, in conjunction with FW 44,
a possession limit of 2,500 lb (1,125 kg)
per trip for GB yellowtail flounder for
common pool vessels to prevent the
common pool sub-ACL from being
exceeded. Although the proposed
Amendment 16 regulations would not
implement any default initial
possession limit for GB yellowtail
flounder (i.e., unlimited at the start of
the fishing year), NMFS is proposing
this initial possession limit under its
existing authority, in order to moderate
catch to ensure fishing limits are not
exceeding allow harvesting of the subACL by the common pool, and decrease
the likelihood that further restrictions
during the FY would be needed to slow
the catch. This possession limit is based
on a recommendation of the Council’s
Groundfish Plan Development Team for
a low GB yellowtail flounder trip limit,
as well as a projected catch analysis for
FY 2010, using current information on
vessels that will fish in the common
pool in FY 2010. If necessary, NMFS
may modify this proposed trip limit
based upon new information regarding
the vessel composition of the common
pool, or revised analytical assumptions.
8. Special Management Program Status
for FY 2010
The Regional Administrator has
existing authority to allocate trips into
the Closed Area (CA) II Yellowtail
Flounder SAP and, for other special
management programs (Regular B DAS
Program; CA I Hook Gear Haddock SAP;
and Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP),
has authority to close the program if the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
program would undermine achieving
the objectives of the FMP or the SAP.
Therefore, in conjunction with FW 44,
NMFS proposes that for FY 2010, zero
trips be allocated to the CA II Yellowtail
Flounder Special Access Program, based
on a determination that the available
TAC of GB yellowtail flounder is
insufficient to support a minimum level
of fishing activity within the CA II SAP.
The Regional Administrator has the
authority to determine the allocation of
the total number of trips into the CA II
SAP based on several criteria, including
the GB yellowtail flounder TAC level
and the amount of GB yellowtail
flounder caught outside of the SAP. As
implemented in 2005 by Framework
Adjustment 40B (FW 40B) (70 FR 31323,
June 1, 2005), zero trips to this SAP
should be allocated if the available GB
yellowtail flounder catch is insufficient
to support at least 150 trips with a
15,000-lb (6,804-kg) trip limit (i.e., 150
trips of 15,000 lb/trip = 2,250,000 lb
(1,021 mt) needed). This calculation
takes into account the projected catch
from the area outside of the SAP. Based
on the proposed groundfish sub-ACL, of
2,202,355 lb (999 mt), even if the
projected catch from outside the SAP
area is zero, there is still insufficient GB
yellowtail flounder available to allow
the SAP to proceed (i.e., 2,202,355 lb
(999 mt) available < 2,250,000 (1,021
mt) needed).
NMFS also proposes, in conjunction
with FW 44, to disallow the use of
Category B DAS in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock SAP for common pool
vessels in FY 2010, based on the
Regional Administrator’s existing
authority to close the SAP if the
program would undermine the
achievement of the objectives of the
SAP or the FMP. All of the FY 2010
incidental catch TACs proposed for the
SAP are very small (GB cod: 2,646 lb
(1.2 mt); GB yellowtail flounder: 1,323
lb (0.6 mt); pollock: 1,724 lb (0.8 mt);
and GB winter flounder: 2,646 lb (1.2
mt)), and would therefore be difficult to
monitor. Concurrent trips by several
vessels into the SAP, or even a single
trip, could result in the incidental
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TAC(s) being exceeded quickly. Based
on historical information of the amount
of GB cod caught (5,276 lb (2.4 mt)) on
SAP trips that ended on a Category B
DAS, the SAP would provide little
opportunity to target haddock, with a
high likelihood of the SAP closing upon
reaching the incidental catch TAC for
cod. Furthermore, past participation in
this SAP was extremely low (e.g., eight
trips in FY 2008). For these reasons, the
use of Category B DAS in the SAP
would be inconsistent with the objective
of the SAP to allow access to haddock
while avoiding or minimizing impacts
on stocks of concern. Under proposed
5025
2004 (1,130 mt), and scaled according to
the size of the exploitable biomass of
western GB haddock compared to the
biomass size in 2004 (27,313 mt). The
size of the western component of the GB
haddock stock is estimated as 35
percent of the size of the total GB
haddock stock. Therefore, if the 2010
exploitable biomass of haddock is
projected to be 291,682 mt, the formula
and resultant TAC is as follows:
(.35)(291,682)/27,313) × 1,130 = 4,223.7
mt. Table 10 contains the proposed CA
I Hook Gear Haddock SAP TACs and
pertinent information for FY 2010–2012.
Amendment 16 rules, sector vessels
would not be restricted by the
incidental catch TAC, and could fish in
the SAP, provided they have adequate
ACE for Eastern GB haddock (and other
stocks).
9. Haddock TAC for CA I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP
FW 44 proposes specification of a
haddock TAC for the CA I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP based on the GARM III
stock assessment and a formula
implemented in FW 42. The haddock
TAC in a particular year is based on the
TAC that was specified for the SAP in
TABLE 10—CA I HOOK GEAR HADDOCK SAP TACS FY 2010–2012.
GB Haddock exploitable biomass
(mt)
Year
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
2004
2010
2011
2012
Western GB Haddock exploitable
biomass
78,037
291,682
218,054
177,978
27,313
102,089
76,319
62,292
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................................................
10. Revised Stock Areas for GB
Yellowtail Flounder and GB Winter
Flounder
In 2004, Framework Adjustment 40A
(FW 40A) (69 FR 67780, November 19,
2004) established the Regular B DAS
Program to provide opportunities for
vessels to use Category B Regular DAS
to selectively harvest healthy stocks of
haddock, while avoiding stocks of
concern (i.e., stocks that were
overfished and subject to overfishing).
That action specified stock areas that
would be closed if quarterly incidental
TACs for stocks of concern were caught.
The proposed rule to implement
measures in Amendment 16 (74 FR
69382, December 31, 2009) revised these
areas to specify that they would also be
used to identify the stock areas in which
possession limits are applied, and to
specify areas in which sector allocations
of ACE would apply.
The Northeast Fisheries Science
Center (Center) recently compared the
stock areas used in stock assessments
with those to be used to monitor the
catch of ACLs in the NE multispecies
fishery beginning in FY 2010. The stock
areas identified by the Center differed
slightly from the stock areas previously
specified for the Regular B DAS Program
under FW 40A, and the stock areas
proposed in Amendment 16 for trip
limits and sector ACEs. In particular,
the stock areas identified by the Center
for GB yellowtail flounder and GB
winter flounder included statistical
areas 522, 525, 542, 543, 561, and 562,
while the stock areas for GB yellowtail
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
flounder and GB winter flounder
originally implemented under FW 40A
and revised by the Amendment 16 were
limited to statistical areas 522, 525, 561,
and 562 (i.e., only the U.S./Canada
Management Area), and did not include
542 and 543. To ensure that the areas
used to attribute catch to stock areas for
the purposes of monitoring ACLs
correspond to the stock areas used in
assessments, this proposed rule
modifies the GB yellowtail flounder and
GB winter flounder stock areas listed at
50 CFR 648.85(b)(6)(v)(H) and (I) in the
Amendment 16 proposed rule to
include statistical areas 542 and 543.
Classification
At this time, NMFS has made a
preliminary determination that the
measures this proposed rule would
implement are consistent with the FMP,
MSA and other applicable laws. In
making the final determination, NMFS
will take into account the data, views,
and comments received during the
comment period.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order (E.O.)
12866.
This proposed rule does not contain
policies with Federalism or ‘‘takings’’
implications as those terms are defined
in E.O. 13132 and E.O. 12630,
respectively.
An IRFA was prepared, which is
expanded upon and incorporated
herein, as required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). Below
is a summary of the IRFA, which
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Biomass (yr)/
biomass 2004
TAC (mt, live
weight)
..............................
3.738
2.794
2.281
..............................
4,223.7
3,157.5
2,577.2
describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have
on small entities. A detailed description
of the action, why it is being considered,
and the legal basis for this action are
contained in the preamble to this
proposed rule, and in the Executive
Summary and Section 3.2 of the EA
prepared for this action.
The preferred alternative would
modify the Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod
and pollock trip limits proposed in
Amendment 16 by: (1) Reducing the
GOM cod limit proposed in Amendment
16 (2,000 lb (907.2 kg)/DAS up to 12,000
lb (5,443.2 kg/trip) to the status quo
level (800 lb (362.9 kg)/DAS up to 4,000
lb (1,814.4 kg)/trip); (2) reducing the
GOM cod trip limit for vessels fishing
under a Handgear A or Handgear B
permit to 300 lb (136.1 kg)/trip and 75
(34.0 kg)lb/trip, respectively; and (3)
imposing a trip limit for pollock to of
1,000 lb (453.6 kg)/DAS up to 10,000 lb
(4,536 kg)/trip (Amendment 16 has no
proposed possession limit for pollock).
This alternative would also: (1) Grant
the RA the authority to implement
inseason trip limits and/or differential
DAS counting for any groundfish stock
in order to prevent catch from exceeding
the ACL; (2) specify OFLs, ABCs, and
ACLs for all 20 groundfish stocks in the
FMP for FY 2010 through 2012, as well
as the TACs for transboundary Georges
Bank (GB) stocks, and allocations of
yellowtail flounder to the scallop fleet;
(3) allocate zero trips to the CA II
Yellowtail Flounder SAP; (4) limit the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP to
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
5026
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
the use of Category A DAS for common
pool vessels; (5) delay the opening of
the Eastern U.S./Canada Management
Area for trawl vessels; and (6)
implement a GB yellowtail flounder trip
limit of 2,500 lb (1,125 kg). These
measures would affect regulated entities
engaged in commercial fishing for
groundfish and scallops. Sub-ACLs
would also be set for the recreational
catches of GOM cod and GOM haddock,
and would affect regulated entities
engaged in the party/charter industry.
Under the Small Business Act (SBA),
any commercial fishing vessel that
generates $4 million in sales, or any
party/charter operation with $7 million
in annual sales, is considered a small
business. Although multiple vessels
may be owned by a single owner,
tracking of ownership is not readily
available to reliably ascertain affiliated
entities. Therefore, for purposes of
analysis each permitted vessel is treated
as a single small entity. During FY 2008
(the most recent complete FY), 2,732
vessels were issued a scallop and/or a
NE multispecies permit. Of these
vessels, 1,867 were issued only a NE
multispecies permit, 500 were only
issued a scallop permit, and 365 were
issued both a scallop and a NE
multispecies permit. The latter include
vessels that have a limited access
scallop and a limited access Category E
(combination vessel) groundfish permit,
as well as vessels that hold some
combination of a party/charter permit
and a limited access scallop permit or
a general category permit. Among NE
multispecies permit holders, 1,472 held
limited access permits, and 760 held
open access party/charter permits.
Based on FY 2008 activity, 1,267 of
the 2,732 vessels with either a
commercial scallop or NE multispecies
permit participated in the scallop or NE
multispecies fishery. Median gross sales
for these vessels were $186 thousand,
and no one entity had sales exceeding
$4 million. Based on FY 2008 logbook
data, 143 of the 760 permitted party/
charter vessels participated in the GOM
recreational groundfish fishery where
either GOM haddock or GOM cod were
retained. The total number of passengers
carried by a single of these regulated
party/charter operators did not exceed
11,000. At an average passenger fee of
approximately $65 per passenger, none
of the participating party/charter
businesses would exceed $7 million in
sales. Therefore, NMFS has determined
that all 1,410 of the participating
commercial and recreational for-hire
vessels are considered small entities
under the RFA.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Economic Impacts of the Proposed
Action
A more detailed treatment of
economic impacts may be found in
Section 7.4 of the EA. As noted in
Section 7.4, the economic impacts of the
ACLs set for the commercial groundfish
fishery are uncertain for any given
vessel, because the economic impacts
depend on whether the vessel owner
chooses to enroll in a sector or remains
in the common pool. Sectors offer relief
from certain regulations while being
limited to a quota on catch. Sectors
provide opportunities to improve
economic efficiency while placing a
premium on managing available quota
for multiple species to maximize the
value of landings. Fishing in the context
of a sector will likely require changes in
fishing practices including where,
when, and how fishing operations are
conducted.
Groundfish revenues during both FY
2007 and 2008 were approximately $85
million. Given the proposed 2010 ACLs,
at 2008 prices, the available potential
revenue would be approximately $190
million, assuming the available ACL for
all stocks can be harvested and no
discarding occurs. Realizing revenues of
this magnitude is unlikely because some
level of discarding is likely, and
available ACL for some species will
constrain the ability to harvest the full
ACL of others. If there are no changes
in recent discarding rates or gear
selectivity, groundfish revenues may be
expected to decline to $63 million in FY
2010. However, improvements in
selectivity, particularly while fishing for
GB haddock, which comprises nearly
half of the aggregate groundfish ACL,
could lead to substantially higher
revenues. If, for example, selectivity
could be improved by 50 percent over
FYF 2007–2008 averages, groundfish
revenues would be an estimated $87
million in FY 2010.
Even if fishing revenues do not
improve, vessel owners that enroll in
sectors may still find themselves in a
more favorable financial position
because sectors offer the opportunity for
pooling of quota across fishing
platforms. For individuals that own
multiple vessels, operating in a sector
allows them to shed redundant capital,
thereby reducing fixed costs. Operating
costs may also be reduced because
sectors participants are granted certain
regulatory exemptions that decrease
overall costs, and because fishing will
likely be moved to an owner’s most
efficient vessel.
Economic impacts on vessels that do
not enroll in a sector are also uncertain.
The common pool measures (trip limits
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for GOM cod and pollock) were
designed to ensure that the catch does
not exceed the sub-ACL allocated to the
common pool as a whole. The economic
impact of these measures was estimated
by applying the common pool measures
adopted under Amendment 16, as
modified by this proposed action, to FY
2007 activity. As of September 1, 2009,
723 permits had enrolled in a sector,
and 757 had not. The latter figure
includes a large number of vessels that
have not been active in the groundfish
fishery. In fact, only 279 of the common
pool vessels had any Category A DAS
that would enable them to participate in
the groundfish fishery. Of these 279,
only 113 were found to have actually
participated in the groundfish fishery.
These vessels had aggregate gross sales
of $24.8 million (an average of $219,500
per vessel), of which nearly 30 percent
was derived from sales on trips where
groundfish were landed. The estimated
combined effect of the Amendment 16/
FW 44 measures on the common pool is
to reduce total sales by $5.1 million, an
average of $45,100 per vessel, or 20.1
percent. This represents a $3 million
reduction in groundfish revenue from
2008 levels. These economic impacts
represent an upper bound of the adverse
impacts, because they do not reflect the
ability of vessels to modify fishing
behavior or to lease DAS to mitigate
potential impacts. However, the ability
to offset such impact by DAS leasing
may be limited. Converting 2007
activity into 24-hr increments, as
proposed in Amendment 16, the total
DAS needed to fish at 2007 levels (3,769
DAS) exceeds that of the total DAS that
will be allocated to the common pool
(3,600) in FY 2010. Furthermore, the
ability to find trading partners may also
be limited by the restrictions on trading
among vessels within specified baseline
length and horsepower characteristics.
The allocation of yellowtail flounder
to the scallop fishery in FY 2010 would
have no economic impact on the scallop
fishery, because the allocation would
not constrain scallop catch. The
economic impact of this action on the
NE multispecies fishery in FY 2010
would be a reduction in multispecies
revenue of between one and fifteen
percent. The value of each metric ton of
yellowtail flounder to the NE
multispecies fishery ranges from a low
of $3,296 to a high of $41,176,
depending on whether the estimate
includes only the value of yellowtail
flounder, or also includes potential
revenue losses from other groundfish
stocks that may result from loss of
access to a yellowtail stock area.
In contrast, as of 2011, it is
anticipated that there will be short-term
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
AMs that will impact the scallop fishery
if the sub-ACL is exceeded. The
economic impact of the yellowtail
flounder sub-ACL for the scallop fishery
for FY 2011 is uncertain. This sub-ACL
for the scallop fishery would have a
potential impact on both groundfish and
scallop vessels. However, as was the
case for the setting of NE multispecies
ACLs, the impact on any given vessel is
indeterminate. The AM for the scallop
fleet has yet to be determined, and
setting an ACL may cause changes in
fishing strategies to avoid forgone
revenues that may be associated with
exceeding the ACL. Assuming an
inseason AM is selected, and there is no
change in fishing patterns by either
groundfish or scallop vessels, an upperbound estimate is a total revenue loss of
$35 million and $2.6 million for scallop
and groundfish, respectively, during
2011, and losses of $36 million and $4
million during 2012. These values
represent about 6 percent of the likely
scallop ACLs that will be set for 2011
and 2012, and about 5 percent or less of
groundfish revenue, depending on
factors noted above affecting realized
groundfish revenue.
Because the FW 44 yellowtail
flounder allocation to the scallop fishery
is based on the projected scallop
harvest, a modification to FW 21 to the
Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP could affect
the proposed FW 44 allocation of
yellowtail flounder to both the scallop
and the NE multispecies fisheries. The
outcome of the Council’s January 2010,
review of FW 21 was unknown at the
time this document was drafted for
publication. However, even if the
yellowtail flounder allocations are not
changed in FW 44, a modification of the
scallop management program could
change the impacts of the yellowtail
flounder allocations, such that they are
different than analyzed in the FW 44
EA. If necessary, the final FW 44 EA
will be revised to analyze the impacts of
the yellowtail flounder allocation, and
the final rule will include a summary of
the pertinent economic impacts.
For FY 2010, the estimated revenue
loss for the groundfish fishery resulting
from the combined impacts of the
proposed common pool measures and
ACL is between $3 million and $27
million (from the baseline FY 2008
revenue of $85 million), depending on
the proportion of available fish that is
caught. The larger revenue reductions
would result from a continuation of
recent TAC utilization and discard rates
(which are only a small fraction of
available haddock that are caught),
whereas the lower revenue reduction
estimate would require a 50-percent
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
reduction in the amount of underharvesting.
For FY 2011, the revenue loss
resulting from the combined impacts of
the common pool measures, ACL, and
yellowtail flounder allocation to the
scallop fishery is estimated at between
$26.9 million and $53.8 million. The FY
2011 revenue loss for the scallop fleet is
estimated at $35 million. The FY 2011
impact on groundfish revenue ranges
from a loss of $15.8 million to a gain of
$11.1 million. For FY 2012, the
estimated revenue loss resulting from
the combined impacts of the common
pool measures, ACL, and yellowtail
flounder allocation to the scallop fishery
is between $27.6 million and $54.8
million. The FY 2012 loss to the scallop
fleet is estimated at $36 million. The FY
2012 impact on groundfish revenue
ranges from a loss of $14.8 million to a
gain of $12.4 million.
The proposed action would not
modify the recreational measures
proposed in Amendment 16. Those
measures would add 2 weeks to the
GOM cod closed season and reduce the
size limit on GOM haddock from 19 to
18 inches (47.5 to 45 cm). Thus,
passenger demand may be expected to
respond to these regulatory changes,
and may not be expected to be affected
by the setting of any particular
recreational sub-ACL. However, because
exceeding a recreational sub-ACL would
trigger an AM, the economic impacts on
recreational party/charter vessels would
be associated with the likelihood that
harvest levels would trigger an AM.
According to GARM III estimates of
landings, GOM cod harvest by all
recreation modes ranged between 1,960
mt and 953 mt from FY 2004 to 2007.
The GOM cod recreational sub-ACL
would be 2,673 mt, 2,824 mt, and 2,826
mt during FY 2010, 2011, and 2012,
respectively. Because harvest levels of
GOM cod by the recreational sector,
including party/charter operators, has
been below the recreational sub-ACL for
GOM cod, an AM would not be
expected to be triggered by these limits.
For this reason, the GOM cod sub-ACL
would not be expected to have an
adverse economic impact on party/
charter vessels.
By contrast, during FY 2004–2007, the
recreational harvest of GOM haddock
ranged between 430 mt and 717 mt, and
under this proposed rule the
recreational sub-ACL for GOM haddock
would decline from 324 mt in FY 2010,
to 259 mt in 2012. This means that the
recreational GOM haddock ACL will be
about 57 percent of the FY 2004–2007
average harvest. In the absence of
avoidance behavior by party/charter
vessels, the GOM haddock sub-ACL may
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5027
be expected to be exceeded, triggering
an AM. The impact of triggering a GOM
haddock AM on party/charter vessels is
uncertain. Available data suggest
substitutability between cod and
haddock on party/charter trips, so if the
GOM cod recreational sub-ACL is not
constraining, some switching between
haddock and cod on GOM party/charter
trips may be anticipated. The economic
impact on party/charter operators will
depend on the selected AM and the
relative strength of angler preference
between cod and haddock. If the AM is
a seasonal closure, then the economic
impact would be a loss in trips that
could be taken during the closure. These
trips may not be recovered, given the
seasonal nature of recreational
passenger demand. If the GOM haddock
AM is a change in the bag or size limit,
and cod may easily be substituted for
haddock, then passenger demand may
be expected to be largely unchanged and
the economic impact on party/charter
vessels would likely be relatively low.
The economic impacts to the
groundfish fishery of specification of the
U.S./Canada TACs are difficult to
predict due to the many factors that may
affect the level of catch; however, it is
likely that, due to the substantially
reduced FY 2010 TACs for Eastern GB
cod and GB yellowtail flounder
(compared to FY 2009), the proposed
action would result in reduced overall
revenue from the U.S./Canada
Management Area. The amount of fish
landed and sold would not be equal to
the sum of the TACs, but would be
reduced as a result of discards (for the
common pool), and may be further
reduced by limitations on access to
stocks that may result from the
associated fishing rules. Reductions to
the value of the fish may result from
fishing derby behavior and potential
impact on markets. The revenue from
the sale of the three transboundary
stocks may be up to 22 percent less than
such revenue in FY 2008. It is possible
that total revenue may be reduced by up
to 30 percent from FY 2009 revenues.
The amount of haddock that has been
harvested from the U.S./Canada
Management Area has been increasing,
but it is unknown whether this trend
will continue. The delayed opening of
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area for trawl
vessels would likely result in increased
revenue from the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area, because it is likely to prolong the
time period during which the area is
open and enable a higher overall catch
of all species. Similarly, the
specification of a trip limit for GB
yellowtail flounder would prolong the
opening of the Eastern U.S./Canada
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
5028
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
Area and result in greater overall
revenue.
The allocation of zero trips for the CA
II Yellowtail Flounder SAP would
preclude additional revenue from CA II,
but would not represent a decrease in
opportunity or revenue from recent
years, because the SAP has not been
opened since FY 2004 due to the status
of the GB yellowtail flounder stock. The
prohibition on the use of Category B
DAS in the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP would result in only a
slight decrease in revenue because
participation in the SAP has been
extremely low.
The proposed action would also
provide the Regional Administrator
authority to implement trip limits or
differential DAS counting inseason in
order to prevent ACLs from being
exceeded, or to facilitate the harvesting
of ACLs. Because it is unclear if this
authority will result in decreased or
increased fishing effort, the effect of this
action may be short-term increases or
decreases in revenue. The RA authority
would contribute to long-term increases
in revenue by optimizing catch levels to
align with catch targets and facilitate
stock rebuilding.
Economic Impact of Alternatives to the
Proposed Action
Under the No Action Alternative,
although ACLs would be specified,
there would be no allocation made to
the scallop fishery, and no U.S./Canada
TACs would be specified. Under the No
Action Alternative, the common pool
management measures would be the
same as those proposed by Amendment
16, and the Regional Administrator
would not have additional authority to
implement inseason trip limits or
differential DAS requirements in order
to prevent ACLs from being exceeded.
Because under the no action
alternative the ACL is higher than that
set by the proposed action, potential
groundfish fishery revenues would be
higher. As a result of not making a
yellowtail flounder allocation to the
scallop fishery, there would be no
difference in scallop revenues in FY
2010 between the no action and the
proposed action alternatives, because
the scallop ACL sub-component would
not constrain the scallop fishery in FY
2010. No allocation of yellowtail to the
scallop fishery in FY 2010 would,
however, result in additional revenue
for the groundfish fishery (the revenue
associated with 110 mt and 111 mt of
GB and SNE/MA yellowtail flounder,
respectively). Under the no action
alternative, no specification of the U.S./
Canada TACs would result in increased
revenue from the U.S./Canada
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Management Area in the short-term, but
would undermine rebuilding of GB cod
and yellowtail flounder, and would
likely result in long-term reductions in
revenue.
Additionally, under the no action
alternative, as a result of not making a
yellowtail flounder allocation to scallop
vessels in FY 2011 and 2012, scallop
and groundfish fishing revenues would
likely be higher than anticipated under
the proposed action. If an allocation is
not made, then the scallop catches
would not be constrained by the level of
incidental catch of yellowtail flounder
in the fishery. In FY 2011 and 2012, the
overall limit on yellowtail flounder
catch may reduce scallop fishery
revenues by $35 million and $36
million, respectively. With respect to
groundfish revenue, the upper bounds
for the difference between the no action
alternative and the proposed action for
FYs 2011 and 2012 are $2.6 million and
$4 million, respectively. Not specifying
the U.S./Canada TACs could result in
increased revenues for groundfish
fishermen; however, not specifying
TACs is likely to increase the risk of
overfishing the transboundary stocks,
and of long-term declines in landings
and revenues.
The no action alternative would
neither implement more restrictive trip
limits for GOM cod and pollock, nor
provide the Regional Administrator the
authority to implement inseason effort
controls (trip limits or differential DAS
counting). As such, the economic
impacts of the no action alternative
would not differ from those described in
Amendment 16 analysis. There is the
possibility that, under the no action
alternative, there would be a lower
likelihood of derby fisheries occurring,
and that vessels owners would have an
increased ability to plan their year than
under the proposed alternative. These
potential outcomes from the No Action
Alternative might, therefore, lead to
greater economic stability, because
inseason changes to the regulations
would not occur (except in the U.S./
Canada Management Area).
The Council considered a third
alternative for effort control measures.
As stated in this rule, this alternative
proposes to create a 2:1 differential DAS
counting in the inshore GOM. Based on
the September 1, 2009, sector roster
composition for FY 2010, the 2:1
differential DAS counting alternative
would impact very few common pool
vessels because, for the most part, the
common pool is comprised of vessels
that primarily engage in fisheries other
than groundfish. Of the vessels affected
(approximately nine), the estimated
reduction in total revenue ranges from
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10 percent to 70 percent. This economic
impact represents an upper bound of the
adverse impacts, because it does not
reflect the ability of vessels to modify
fishing behavior or the potential to lease
DAS to mitigate potential impacts.
Under the no action alternative, trawl
vessels would be able to fish in the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area (Eastern Area)
as of May 1, 2010, and would not be
delayed access until August 1, 2010.
Further, the Regional Administrator
would not implement a GB yellowtail
flounder trip limit of 2,500 lb (1,125 kg).
The result of this scenario would likely
be a higher catch rate of both GB cod
and GB yellowtail flounder early in the
FY, but also accelerated catch of the
TAC limits and early closure of the
Eastern Area. In this event, the no action
alternative would result in reduced
revenue for groundfish vessels, because
prolonged access to the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area by vessels would result in
greater harvest of other stocks in
addition to cod and yellowtail flounder.
Additionally, under the no action
alternative, common pool vessels would
be allowed to utilize Category B DAS in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area Haddock
SAP. Although under the no action
alternative the use of Category B DAS in
this SAP would generate some revenue,
the difference in revenue between the
proposed action and the no action
alternative would be minor because,
under the no action alternative, the SAP
would likely close after a very few trips
due to the small incidental catch TACs.
This rule contains no proposed
reporting or recordkeeping
requirements.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: January 27, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. Further amend § 648.10, as
proposed to be amended at 74 FR 69419,
December 31, 2009 by revising
paragraph (k)(3)(iv) to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
§ 648.10
areas.
NE multispecies broad stock
§ 648.60 Sea scallop area access program
requirements.
(k) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) SNE/MA Stock Area 4. The SNE/
MA Stock Area 4 is the area bounded on
the north and west by the coastline of
the United States, bounded on the south
by a line running from the east-facing
coastline of North Carolina at 35° N. lat.
until its intersection with the EEZ, and
bounded on the east by straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated:
SNE/MA STOCK AREA 4
Point
N. Latitude
(1)
41°20′
41°20′
41°10′
41°10′
41°00′
41°00′
39°50′
39°50′
39°00′
39°00′
G12 ................
IGB7 ..............
IGB6 ..............
IGB5 ..............
IGB4 ..............
IGB3 ..............
IGB2 ..............
SNE4 .............
SNE3 .............
SNE5 .............
SNE6 .............
W. Longitude
70°00′
70°00′
69°50′
69°50′
69°30′
69°30′
68°50′
68°50′
69°00′
69°00′
(2)
1 South-facing
shoreline of Cape Cod, MA.
U.S.-Canada maritime boundary as it
intersects with the EEZ.
2 The
3. In § 648.14, add paragraph
(i)(2)(iii)(D) and revise paragraphs
(k)(13)(ii)(A) and (B) to read as follows:
§ 648.14
Prohibitions.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(D) Discard yellowtail flounder that
meet the minimum size restrictions
specified under § 648.83(a)(1) and (2).
*
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(13) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) Land, or possess on board a
vessel, more than the possession or
landing limits specified in § 648.86(a),
(b), (c), (d), (e), (g), (h), (j), (k), (l), (n),
(p), (r), and (s); or violate any of the
other provisions of § 648.86, unless
otherwise specified in § 648.17.
(B) Possess or land per trip more than
the possession or landing limits
specified in § 648.86(a), (b), (c), (e), (g),
(h), (j), (l), (n), (p), (r), and (s),
§ 648.81(n), § 648.82(b)(5) and (6),
§ 648.85, or § 648.88 if the vessel has
been issued a limited access NE
multispecies permit or open access NE
multispecies permit, as applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 648.60, revise paragraph
(a)(5)(ii) introductory text and paragraph
(a)(5)(ii)(C) to read as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
(a) * * *
(5) * * *
(ii) NE multispecies possession limits
and yellowtail flounder TACs. A limited
access scallop vessel that is declared
into a trip and fishing within the Sea
Scallop Access Areas described in
§ 648.59(b) through (d), and issued a
valid NE multispecies permit as
specified in § 648.4(a)(1), may fish for,
possess, and land, per trip, up to a
maximum of 1,000 lb (453.6 kg) of all
NE multispecies combined, excluding
yellowtail flounder, subject to the
minimum commercial fish size
restrictions specified in § 648.83(a)(1)
and (2), and the additional restrictions
for Atlantic cod, haddock, and
yellowtail flounder specified in
paragraphs (a)(5)(ii)(A) through (C) of
this section. Such vessel is subject to the
seasonal restriction established under
the Sea Scallop Area Access Program
and specified in § 648.59(b)(4), (c)(4),
and (d)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
(C) Yellowtail flounder. Such vessel
must retain all yellowtail flounder that
meet the minimum size restrictions
specified under § 648.83(a)(1) and (2).
(1) Scallop Access Area TAC
Availability. After declaring a trip into
and fishing within the Closed Area I,
Closed Area II, or Nantucket Lightship
Scallop Access Areas described in
§ 648.59(b), (c), and (d), respectively a
scallop vessel that has a valid NE
multispecies permit as specified in
§ 648.4(a)(1) may possess and land
yellowtail flounder, provided the
Regional Administrator has not issued a
notice that the scallop fishery portion of
the TACs specified in § 648.85(c) for the
respective Closed Area I, Closed Area II,
or Nantucket Lightship Scallop Access
Areas have been harvested. The
Regional Administrator shall publish
notification in the Federal Register, in
accordance with the Administrative
Procedure Act, to notify scallop vessel
owners that the scallop fishery portion
of the TAC for a yellowtail flounder
stock has been or is projected to be
harvested by scallop vessels in any
Access Area. Upon notification in the
Federal Register that a TAC has been or
is projected to be harvested, scallop
vessels are prohibited from fishing in,
and declaring and initiating a trip to the
Access Area(s), where the TAC applies,
for the remainder of the fishing year,
unless the yellowtail flounder TAC is
increased, as specified in paragraph
(a)(5)(ii)(C)(3) of this section.
(2) U.S./Canada Area TAC
availability. After declaring a trip into
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5029
and fishing in the Closed Area I or
Closed Area II Access Area described in
§ 648.59(b) and (c), a scallop vessel that
has a valid NE multispecies permit, as
specified in § 648.4(a)(1), may possess,
and land yellowtail flounder, provided
that the Regional Administrator has not
issued a notice that the U.S./Canada
yellowtail flounder TAC specified in
§ 648.85(a)(2) has been harvested. If the
yellowtail flounder TAC established for
the U.S./Canada Management Area
pursuant to § 648.85(a)(2) has been or is
projected to be harvested, as described
in § 648.85(a)(3)(iv)(C)(3), scallop
vessels are prohibited from possessing
or landing yellowtail flounder in or
from the Closed Area I and Closed Area
II Access Areas.
(3) Modification to yellowtail flounder
TACs. The yellowtail flounder TACs
allocated to scallop vessels may be
increased by the Regional Administrator
after December 1 of each year pursuant
to § 648.85(c)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
5. Further amend § 648.82, as
proposed to be amended at 74 FR 69429,
December 31, 2009 by revising the
introductory text to paragraph (b)(6),
revising paragraphs (e)(1)(i) and
(n)(1)(ii), and adding paragraph (o) to
read as follows:
§ 648.82 Effort-control program for NE
multispecies limited access vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) Handgear A category. A vessel
qualified and electing to fish under the
Handgear A category, as described in
§ 648.4(a)(1)(i)(A), may retain, per trip,
up to 300 lb (135 kg) of cod, one
Atlantic halibut, and the daily
possession limit for other regulated
species and ocean pout as specified
under § 648.86. The cod trip limit shall
be adjusted proportionally to the trip
limit for GOM cod (rounded up to the
nearest 50 lb (22.7 kg)), as specified in
§ 648.86(b)). For example, if the GOM
cod trip limit specified at § 648.86(b)
doubled, then the cod trip limit for the
Handgear A category would double.
Qualified vessels electing to fish under
the Handgear A category are subject to
the following restrictions:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Common pool vessels. For a
common pool vessel, Category A DAS
shall accrue in 24-hr increments, unless
otherwise required under paragraphs (n)
or (o) of this section. For example, a
vessel that fished from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m.
would be charged 24 hr of Category A
DAS, not 16 hr; a vessel that fished for
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
5030
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
25 hr would be charged 48 hr of
Category A instead of 25 hr.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Differential DAS counting factor.
For determining the differential DAS
counting AM specified in this paragraph
(n)(1), or the inseason differential DAS
counting adjustment specified in
paragraph (o) of this section, the
following differential DAS factor shall,
except as provided in paragraph
(n)(1)(iii) of this section, be applied to
the DAS accrual rate specified in
paragraph (e)(1) of this section, and
implemented in a manner consistent
with the Administrative Procedure Act.
Proportion of ACL
caught
Differential DAS
factor
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
No change
No change
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Inseason adjustment to differential
DAS counting for NE multispecies
common pool vessels. (1) In addition to
the DAS accrual provisions specified in
paragraphs (e) and (n) of this section,
and other measures specified in this
part, common pool vessels are subject to
the following restrictions: The Regional
Administrator shall project the catch of
regulated species or ocean pout by
common pool vessels and shall
determine whether such catch will
exceed any of the sub-ACLs specified
for common pool vessels as described in
§ 648.90(a)(4). This projection shall
include catch by common pool vessels,
as well as available information, if
available, regarding the catch of
regulated species and ocean pout by
vessels fishing for NE multispecies in
state waters outside of the authority of
the FMP, vessels fishing in exempted
fisheries, and vessels fishing in the
Atlantic sea scallop fishery. If it is
projected that catch will exceed or
under-harvest the common pool subACL, the Regional Administrator may,
at any time during the fishing year,
implement a differential DAS counting
factor to all Category A DAS used
within the pertinent stock area(s), as
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
specified in paragraph (n)(1)(i) of this
section, in a manner consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act.
Notwithstanding the fact that the
differential DAS accountability
measures described in paragraph (n)(1)
of this section are intended to address
potential over-harvests in fishing year
2010 and 2011, the scope of the
Regional Administrator authority
specified in this paragraph (o) is not
limited to FY 2010 and 2011.
(2) The differential DAS counting
factor shall be based on the projected
proportion of the sub-ACL of each NE
multispecies stock caught by common
pool vessels, rounded to the nearest
even tenth, as specified in paragraph
(n)(1)(ii) of this section, unless
otherwise specified in § 648.90(a)(5).
For example, if the Regional
Administrator projects that common
pool vessels will catch 1.18 times the
sub-ACL for GOM cod by the end of
fishing year 2010, the Regional
Administrator may implement a
differential DAS counting factor of 1.2
to all Category A DAS used by common
pool vessels within the Inshore GOM
Differential DAS Area during fishing
year 2010 (i.e., Category A DAS will be
charged at a rate of 28.8 hr for every 24
hr fished—1.2 times 24-hr DAS
counting). If it is projected that catch
will simultaneously exceed or
underharvest the sub-ACLs for several
regulated species stocks within a
particular stock area, the Regional
Administrator may implement the most
restrictive differential DAS counting
factor derived from paragraph (n)(1)(ii)
of this section for the sub-ACLs
exceeded or underharvested to any
Category A DAS used by common pool
vessels within that particular stock area.
For example, if it is projected that the
common pool vessel catch will exceed
the GOM cod sub-ACL by a factor of 1.2
and the CC/GOM yellowtail flounder
sub-ACL by a factor of 1.1, the Regional
Administrator may implement a
differential DAS counting factor of 1.2
to any Category A DAS fished by
common pool vessels within the Inshore
GOM Differential DAS Area during the
fishing year. For any inseason
differential DAS counting factor
implemented inseason, the differential
DAS counting factor shall be applied
against the DAS accrual provisions
specified in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this
section for the time spent fishing in the
applicable differential DAS counting
area based upon the first VMS position
into the applicable differential DAS
counting area and the first VMS position
outside of the applicable differential
DAS counting area pursuant to § 648.10.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
For example, if a vessel fished 12 hr
inside a differential DAS counting area
where a differential DAS counting factor
of 1.2 would be applied, and 12 hr
outside of the differential DAS counting
area, the vessel would be charged 48 hr
of DAS use because DAS would be
charged in 24-hr increments ((12 hr
inside the area × 1.2 = 14.4 hr) + 12 hr
outside the area, rounded to the next 24hr increment to determine DAS
charged).
(3) For any inseason differential DAS
counting factor implemented in fishing
year 2011, the inseason differential DAS
counting factor shall be applied in
accordance with the DAS accrual
provisions specified in paragraph
(e)(1)(i) of this section, and, if pursuant
to paragraph (n)(1) of this section, in
conjunction with a differential DAS
counting factor also implemented for
the same differential DAS area during
fishing year 2011 as an AM. For
example, if a differential DAS counting
factor of 1.2 was applied to the Inshore
GOM Differential DAS Area during
fishing year 2011, as an AM due to a 20percent overage of the GOM cod subACL in fishing year 2010, and during
fishing year 2011 the GOM cod sub-ACL
was projected to be exceeded by 30
percent, an additional differential DAS
factor of 1.3 would be applied to the
DAS accrual rate as an inseason action
during fishing year 2011. Under this
example, the DAS accrual rate after both
the AM and the inseason differential
DAS rate is applied to FY 2011 in the
Inshore GOM Differential DAS Counting
Area would be 37.4 hr charged for every
24 hr fished—1.2 × 1.3 × 24-hr DAS
charge.
6. In § 648.85, revise paragraphs
(b)(6)(v)(B), (D), (F); and further amend
§ 648.85, as proposed to be amended at,
74 FR 69438, December 31, 2009 by
revising paragraph (b)(6)(v)(H) and (I) to
read as follows:
§ 648.85
Special management programs.
(b) * * *
(6) * * *
(v) * * *
(B) GB cod stock area. The GB cod
stock area, for the purposes of the
Regular B DAS Program, identifying
stock areas for trip limits specified in
§ 648.86, and determining areas
applicable to Sector allocations of ACE
pursuant to § 648.87(b), is the area
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
GB COD STOCK AREA
Point
GB1 ...............
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
N. latitude
(1)
W. longitude
70°00′
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
GB COD STOCK AREA—Continued
Point
GB2
GB3
GB4
GB5
...............
...............
...............
...............
N. latitude
42°20′
42°20′
35°00′
35°00′
W. longitude
Point
of the north-facing coastline of
Cape Cod, MA, and 70°00′ W. long.
2 U.S./Canada maritime boundary.
3 Intersection of the east-facing coastline of
Outer Banks, NC, and 35°00′ N. lat.
*
*
*
*
*
(D) American plaice stock area. The
American plaice stock area, for the
purposes of the Regular B DAS Program,
identifying stock areas for trip limits
specified in § 648.86, and determining
areas applicable to Sector allocations of
ACE pursuant to § 648.87(b), is the area
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
AMERICAN PLAICE STOCK AREA
AMP1 .............
AMP2 .............
AMP3 .............
AMP4 .............
AMP5 .............
AMP6 .............
AMP7 .............
AMP8 .............
AMP9 .............
AMP10 ...........
N. latitude
(1)
(2)
43°50′
43°50′
(3)
(4)
42°30′
42°30′
35°00′
35°00′
N. latitude
SNEW9 ..........
1 Intersection
Point
SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND/MID-ATLAN- through Regional Administrator
TIC
WINTER FLOUNDER STOCK authority, as specified in paragraph (r)
of this section.
AREA—Continued
*
70°00′
(2)
(2)
(3)
W. longitude
1 Intersection of the north-facing Coastline of
Cape Cod, MA, and 70°00′ W. long.
2 U.S./Canada maritime boundary.
3 The intersection of the east-facing coastline of Outer Banks, NC, and 35°00′ N. lat.
*
*
*
*
*
(H) GB yellowtail flounder stock area.
The GB yellowtail flounder stock area,
for the purposes of the Regular B DAS
Program, identifying stock areas for trip
limits specified in § 648.86, and
determining areas applicable to Sector
allocations of ACE pursuant to
§ 648.87(b), is the area bounded on the
east by the U.S./Canadian maritime
boundary, and bound on the north,
west, and south by straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated:
N. latitude
USCA16 .........
USCA1 ...........
USCA2 ...........
USCA17 .........
USCA18 .........
USCA5 ...........
*
*
*
*
*
(F) SNE/MA winter flounder stock
area. The SNE winter flounder stock
area, for the purposes of the Regular B
DAS Program, identifying stock areas for
trip limits specified in § 648.86, and
determining areas applicable to Sector
allocations of ACE pursuant to
§ 648.87(b), is the area defined by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
W. longitude
(1)
68°50′
68°50′
69°00′
69°00′
(1)
42°20′
42°20′
39°50′
39°50′
39°00′
39°00′
1 U.S./Canada
1 Intersection of south-facing ME coastline
and 67°00′ W. long.
2 U.S./Canada maritime boundary.
3 U.S./Canada maritime boundary (northern
intersection with 67°40′ N. lat.).
4 U.S./Canada maritime boundary (southern
intersection with 67°40′ N. lat.)
5 Intersection of east-facing coastline of
Outer Banks, NC, and 35°00′ N. lat.
W. longitude
(3)
35°00′
Point
67°00′
67°00′
(2)
67°40′
67°40′
67°40′
67°40′
(2)
(2)
(5)
maritime boundary.
(I) GB winter flounder stock area. The
GB winter flounder stock area, for the
purposes of the Regular B DAS Program,
identifying stock areas for trip limits
specified in § 648.86, and determining
areas applicable to Sector allocations of
ACE pursuant to § 648.87(b), is the area
bounded on the east by the U.S./
Canadian maritime boundary and
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
Point
N. latitude
USCA16 .........
USCA1 ...........
USCA2 ...........
USCA17 .........
USCA18 .........
USCA5 ...........
(1)
68°50′
68°50′
69°00′
69°00′
(1)
42°20′
42°20′
39°50′
39°50′
39°00′
39°00′
1 U.S./Canada
W. longitude
maritime boundary.
SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND/MID-ATLAN*
*
*
*
*
TIC WINTER FLOUNDER STOCK AREA
7. In § 648.86, revise paragraphs (a)(1)
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
Point
SNEW1
SNEW2
SNEW3
SNEW4
SNEW5
SNEW6
SNEW7
SNEW8
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
VerDate Nov<24>2008
N. latitude
(1)
42°20′
42°20′
39°50′
39°50′
39°00′
39°00′
35°00′
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
W. longitude
70°00′
70°00′
68°50′
68°50′
71°40′
71°40′
(2)
(2)
Jkt 220001
5031
and (b)(1), and add paragraphs (r) and
(s) to read as follows:
§ 648.86 NE Multispecies possession
restrictions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) NE multispecies common pool
vessels. Haddock possession restrictions
for such vessels may be implemented
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) GOM cod landing limit. Except as
provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this
section, or unless otherwise restricted
under § 648.85, a vessel fishing under a
NE multispecies DAS permit, including
a vessel issued a monkfish limited
access permit and fishing under the
monkfish Category C or D permit
provisions, may land up to 800 lb (362.9
kg) of cod for each DAS, or part of a
DAS, up to 4,000 lb (1,818.2 kg) per trip.
Cod on board a vessel subject to this
landing limit must be separated from
other species of fish and stored so as to
be readily available for inspection.
*
*
*
*
*
(r) Pollock. Unless otherwise
restricted under this part, a vessel
issued a NE multispecies DAS permit, a
limited access Handgear A permit, an
open access Handgear B permit, or a
monkfish limited access permit and
fishing under the monkfish Category C
or D permit provisions, may not possess
or land more than 1,000 lb (450 kg) of
pollock for each DAS or part of a DAS
fished, up to 10,000 lb (4,500 kg) per
trip.
(s) Regional Administrator authority
to implement possession limits—(1)
Possession restrictions to prevent
exceeding common pool sub-ACLs. If
the Regional Administrator projects that
the catch of any NE multispecies stock
allocated to common pool vessels
pursuant to § 648.90(a)(4) will exceed
the pertinent sub-ACL, NMFS may
implement or adjust, at any time prior
to or during the fishing year, in a
manner consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act, a perDAS possession limit and/or a
maximum trip limit in order to prevent
exceeding the common pool sub-ACL in
that fishing year.
(2) Possession restrictions to facilitate
harvest of sub-ACLs allocated to the
common pool. If the Regional
Administrator projects that the sub-ACL
of any stock allocated to the common
pool pursuant to § 648.90(a)(4) will not
be caught during the fishing year, the
Regional Administrator may remove or
adjust, in a manner consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act, a perDAS possession limit and/or a
maximum trip limit in order to facilitate
harvest and enable the total catch to
approach, but not exceed, the pertinent
sub-ACL allocated to the common pool
for that fishing year.
8. Further amend § 648.87, as
proposed to be amended at 74 FR 69450,
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
5032
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
December 31, 2009 by revising
paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(B) to read as follows:
§ 648.87
Sector allocation.
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) SNE/MA Yellowtail Flounder
Stock Area. The SNE/MA Yellowtail
Flounder Stock Area, for the purposes of
identifying stock areas for trip limits
specified in § 648.86, and for
determining areas applicable to Sector
allocations of SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder ACE pursuant to paragraph (b)
of this section, is the area bounded by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
SNE/MA YELLOWTAIL FLOUNDER
STOCK AREA
Point
SNE1 .............
SNE2 .............
SNE3 .............
SNE4 .............
SNE5 .............
SNE7 .............
SNE8 .............
SNE9 .............
SNE10 ...........
SNE11 ...........
SNE12 ...........
SNE13 ...........
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS
SNE/MA YELLOWTAIL FLOUNDER
STOCK AREA—Continued
VerDate Nov<24>2008
N. latitude
35°00′
35°00′
39°00′
39°00′
39°50′
39°50′
41°00′
41°00′
41°10′
41°10′
41°20′
41°20′
16:57 Jan 29, 2010
W. longitude
(1)
(2)
(2)
70°00′
70°00′
68°50′
68°50′
69°30′
69°30′
69°50′
69°50′
(3)
Jkt 220001
Point
SNE14 ...........
SNE15 ...........
N. latitude
(4)
(5)
W. longitude
70°00′
70°00′
1 Intersection of east-facing coastline
Outer Banks, NC, and 35°00′ N. lat.
2 U.S./Canada maritime boundary.
3 Intersection of east-facing coastline
Nantucket, MA, and 41°20′ N. lat.
4 Intersection of north-facing coastline
Nantucket, MA, and 70°00′ W. long.
5 Intersection of south-facing coastline
Cape Cod, MA, and 70°00′ W. long.
of
of
of
of
9. In § 648.88, revise paragraphs (a)(1)
and (c) to read as follows:
§ 648.88 Multispecies open access permit
restrictions.
(a) * * *
(1) The vessel may possess and land
up to 75 lb (33.8 kg) of cod and up to
the landing and possession limit
restrictions for other NE multispecies
specified in § 648.86, provided the
vessel complies with the restrictions
specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section. Should the GOM cod trip limit
specified in § 648.86(b)(1) be adjusted in
the future, the cod trip limit specified
under this paragraph (a)(1) shall be
adjusted proportionally (rounded up to
the nearest 25 lb (11.3 kg)).
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(c) Scallop NE multispecies
possession limit permit. With the
exception of vessels fishing in the Sea
Scallop Access Areas in § 648.59(b)
through (d), which are subject to the
possession limits in § 648.60(a)(5)(ii), a
vessel that has been issued a valid NE
multispecies possession limit permit is
subject to the following possession
restrictions:
(1) The vessel shall retain all
yellowtail flounder that meet the
minimum size restrictions in
§ 648.83(a)(1) and (2).
(2) The vessel may possess and land
up to 300 lb (136.1 kg) of regulated NE
multispecies, excluding yellowtail
flounder, when fishing under a scallop
DAS allocated under § 648.53, provided
the vessel does not fish for, possess, or
land haddock from January 1 through
June 30, as specified in paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section, and provided
that the amount of regulated NE
multispecies onboard the vessel does
not exceed any of the pertinent trip
limits in § 648.86, except yellowtail
flounder, and provided the vessel has at
least one standard tote on board.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–2015 Filed 1–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\01FEP1.SGM
01FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 20 (Monday, February 1, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5016-5032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2015]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 0910051338-0034-01]
RIN 0648-AY29
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast
Multispecies Fishery; Framework Adjustment 44
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to implement measures in Framework
Adjustment 44 (FW 44) to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management
Plan (FMP), and specifications for the FMP for fishing years (FY) 2010-
2012. FW 44 measures and specifications, if approved, would be
implemented in conjunction with approved measures in Amendment 16 to
the FMP, as well as with approved sector operations plans authorized
under the FMP. Specifically, FW 44 would modify the Gulf of Maine (GOM)
cod and pollock trip limits proposed in Amendment 16; provide the
Regional Administrator (RA) authority to implement inseason trip limits
and/or differential day-at-sea (DAS) counting for any groundfish stock
in order to prevent catch from exceeding the Annual Catch Limit (ACL);
and specify Overfishing Levels (OFLs), Acceptable Biological Catch
levels (ABCs), and ACLs for all 20 groundfish stocks in the FMP for
fishing years 2010 through 2012, as well as the Total Allowable Catches
(TACs) for transboundary Georges Bank (GB) stocks. NMFS also proposes
in this rule, pursuant to current Regional Administratory authority
under the FMP, to allocate zero trips to the Closed Area II Yellowtail
Flounder Special Access Program (SAP); limit the Eastern U.S./Canada
Haddock SAP to the use of Category A DAS for common pool vessels; delay
the opening of the Eastern U.S./Canada Management Area for trawl
vessels; and implement a GB yellowtail flounder trip limit of 2,500 lb
(1,125 kg). Finally, this rule would make technical corrections to
proposed Amendment 16 regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received by March 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by 0648-AY29, by any one
of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Paper, disk, or CD-ROM comments should be sent to
Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2276. Mark the
outside of the envelope: ``Comments on FW 44 Proposed Rule.''
Fax: (978) 281-9135, Attn: Tom Warren
Instructions: No comments will be posted for public viewing until
after the comment period has closed. All comments received are part of
the public record and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required
fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). You may submit attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
NMFS prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA),
which is contained in the Classification section of this proposed rule.
Copies of the Environmental Assessment (EA) prepared for this rule may
be found at the following internet address: https://www.nero.noaa.gov/nero/regs/frdoc/10/10MultiFW44EA.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Warren, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281-9347, fax (978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the biennial adjustment process
of the FMP, the New England Fishery Management Council (Council)
developed Amendment 16 to implement a wide range of revisions to
management measures based on the results of the most recent stock
assessment (Groundfish Assessment Review Meeting; GARM III; August
2008). A notice of availability for Amendment 16, including the Final
Environmental Impact Statement, as submitted by the Council for review
by
[[Page 5017]]
the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary), was published in the Federal
Register on October 23, 2009 (74 FR 54773). A proposed rule for
Amendment 16 was published on December 31, 2009 (74 FR 69382). Based on
GARM III estimates of fishing mortality and stock size (biomass) in
2007, and subsequent estimates of fishing mortality, Amendment 16
proposes a suite of management measures to continue the rebuilding of
groundfish stocks; an expanded sector management program; and a process
for biennial specification of OFLs, ABCs, and ACLs. The analysis
accompanying Amendment 16 indicates that the proposed management
measures would achieve these objectives.
However, notwithstanding the Amendment 16 analysis, NMFS, based
upon industry concerns regarding the effectiveness of Amendment 16
common pool measures, requested that the Council reconsider these
measures at its September 2009 meeting. Specifically, industry
expressed concern that assumptions inherent in Amendment 16 may be
invalid, and therefore the Amendment 16 proposed measures may not be
restrictive enough to prevent the ACLs from being exceeded
(particularly for GOM cod and pollock). In particular, industry members
noted that fishery participants may modify their effort behavior, for
example by dropping out of sectors prior to the start of the fishing
year and deciding to fish instead in the common pool, if there is the
perception that common pool measures provide better fishing
opportunities than sectors. Industry members also raised the
possibility that Amendment 16 trip limit levels may result in over-
harvest of ACLs for these stocks. For example, based on preliminary
information, a relatively large number of DAS may be allocated to the
common pool (3,601 DAS), compared to the relatively low proposed GOM
cod ACL for the common pool (337 mt; 742,937 lb). Moreover, the
Amendment 16 trip limits for GOM cod are relatively high, at 2,000 lb
(907.2 kg)/DAS, up to 12,000 lb (5,443.2 kg)/trip for GOM cod. As a
result of these allocations, it may be possible for GOM cod ACL to be
exceeded by the common pool participants. Based upon this concern, and
because it is not possible to determine with certainty in advance
whether the analytical assumptions in Amendment 16 will be determined
to be valid, the Council developed more restrictive management measures
in FW 44 at its November 2009 meeting.
The measures in and authority for FW 44 are based in large part on
Amendment 16 being implemented. In addition, FW 44 would modify
proposed Amendment 16 measures. For that reason, if it is approved, FW
44 cannot be implemented until Amendment 16 (if approved) becomes
effective. Moreover, FW 44 measures also affect fishing activities of
the many new sector operations being proposed in concurrent actions. If
approved, FW 44 will become effective at the same time and in
conjunction with Amendment 16, and therefore would be in place when new
sector fishing operations begin on May 1, 2010. FW 44 proposes the
following management measures and specifications:
Management Measures
1. Regional Administrator Authority
Under FW 44, the NMFS RA, Northeast Region, would be given the
authority to modify landing limits for any Northeast (NE) multispecies
stock and/or DAS counting rates at any time during the FY to reduce the
likelihood that ACLs of allocated NE multispecies stocks would be
exceeded, or to facilitate the harvesting of ACLs. For example, if,
based on available information regarding catch of a particular stock,
NMFS projects that the ACL will be exceeded prior to the end of the
fishing year, the RA may implement a more restrictive landing limit for
that stock that would be effective for the remainder of the fishing
year, unless further modified. Alternatively, for the same stock, the
RA could instead decide to implement a more restrictive DAS counting
rate in the geographic area that pertains to the stock (or implement a
change to both a possession limit and DAS counting rate). A
modification to the DAS counting rate, under this example, would apply
to one or more of the differential DAS counting areas proposed in
Amendment 16 that correspond to the pertinent stock(s) (e.g., Inshore
GOM Differential DAS Area; Offshore GOM Differential DAS Area; Inshore
GB Differential DAS Area; Offshore GB Differential DAS Area; and
Southern New England/Mid-Atlantic (SNE/MA) Differential DAS Area). This
inseason adjustment could be implemented by the RA even on the first
day of the fishing year. Thus, beginning in FY 2011, the RA could
adjust the inseason DAS counting rate, in addition to the adjustment to
the DAS counting rate that would be triggered under Amendment 16 as an
accountability measure (AM), in response to exceeding an ACL during the
previous FY.
Although NMFS is not proposing the RA use this new authority at the
beginning of FY 2010, NMFS is nonetheless concerned that the ACLs for
certain stocks may be exceeded in FY 2010, which would trigger
accountability measures in FY 2011. To address the concern for stocks
such as GOM winter flounder and GB cod (stocks for which the proposed
ACLs are substantially less than recent catch levels), NMFS will
monitor catch rates closely and be prepared to implement effort
restrictions early in FY 2010, if necessary.
2. Modification to Amendment 16 Proposed Possession Limits
FW 44 would modify the proposed Amendment 16 GOM cod trip limit and
replace it with the current, status quo trip limit for GOM cod.
Specifically, for limited access DAS vessels, FW 44 would replace the
proposed Amendment 16 GOM cod limit of 2,000 lb (907.2 kg) up to 12,000
lb (5,443.2 kg)/trip, with the status quo GOM cod trip limit of 800 lb
(362.9 kg)/DAS, up to 4,000 lb (1,818.4 kg)/trip. For vessels with a
limited access Handgear A or open access Handgear B permit, FW 44 would
also replace the proposed Amendment 16 cod limits of 750 lb (340.2 kg)
and 200 lb (90.7 kg), respectively, with the status quo trip limits of
300 lb (136.1 kg) and 75 lb (34 kg) per trip. In addition, FW 44 would
implement a new trip limit for pollock of 1,000 lb (453.6 kg)/DAS, up
to 10,000 lb (4,536.0 kg)/trip. Currently there is no trip limit for
pollock, nor is there one proposed in Amendment 16. The proposed FW 44
trip limits are intended to reduce the likelihood of exceeding the GOM
cod and pollock ACLs.
3. Requirement for Limited Access Scallop Vessels To Land Yellowtail
Flounder
In conjunction with the allocations of yellowtail flounder to the
scallop fishery (described below under ``specifications''), vessels
with a Federal limited access scallop permit are required to land all
legal-sized yellowtail flounder to reduce discarding. This provision
may also provide an incentive for scallop vessels to minimize the catch
of yellowtail flounder, if landing yellowtail flounder is not cost-
effective.
Specifications
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1361-1423h, requires ACLs to be
implemented in FY 2010 for stocks determined to be subject to
overfishing, and in FY 2011 for all other stocks. Amendment 16 proposes
a biennial
[[Page 5018]]
process for specification of ACLs (and OFLs and ABCs) for all stocks as
of FY 2010. Pursuant to the Amendment 16 proposed process, for FY 2010-
2012 FW 44 would specify OFLs, ABCs, and ACLs, as well as incidental
catch TACs for all stocks covered by the Northeast Multispecies FMP. In
addition, pursuant to current FMP requirements, the Council, in this
rule, recommends annual specifications of U.S./Canada Management Area
TACs. Therefore, as described in further detail below, FW 44 proposes
to specify U.S./Canada TACs; delay the opening of the Eastern U.S./
Canada Management Area for trawl vessels for FY 2010; allocate zero
trips for the CA II Yellowtail Flounder SAP, limit the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock SAP to the use of Category A DAS for common pool
vessels, and implement a GB yellowtail flounder trip limit of 2,500 lb
(1,125 kg). The Regional Administrator has authority to modify
management measures for the U.S./Canada Management Area, as well as
modify certain SAP regulations.
FW 44 proposes the following specifications:
1. OFLs and ABCs
Table 1 contains FW 44 proposed OFLs and ABCs for FY 2010-2012,
based on GARM III stock assessments (2008), for all stocks with the
exception of GB yellowtail flounder, for which the ABC is based on the
Transboundary Resource Assessment Committee stock assessment of 2009.
It is anticipated that the FY 2011 and 2012 values of the GB yellowtail
flounder ABC will be revised during 2010 and 2011, respectively, based
on new transboundary stock assessments. The OFLs and ABCs for FY 2012
will likely be revised during the next biennial adjustment process
(during 2011), but are being specified at this time in the event that
the next biennial adjustment process does not result in the timely
implementation of revised 2012 catch specifications.
The OFL value for a stock is calculated using the estimated stock
size for a particular year, and represents the amount of catch
associated with Fmsy, i.e., the fishing mortality rate that, if applied
over the long term, would result in maximum sustainable yield (MSY).
The ABCs are those recommended by the Council's Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC), and are lower than the OFLs in order to
take into account scientific uncertainty in setting catch limits. The
ABC value for a stock is calculated using the estimated stock size for
a particular year, and for all stocks, with the exception of SNE/MA
winter flounder, represents the amount of catch associated with 75
percent of Fmsy, or the F rate required to rebuild the stock within the
defined rebuilding time period (Frebuild), whichever is lower. For SNE/
MA winter flounder, the ABC was calculated using the F expected to
result from management measures designed to achieve an F as close to
zero as practicable. This ABC is consistent with the SSC recommendation
that for stocks that cannot rebuild to Bmsy in the specified rebuilding
period, even with no fishing, the ABC should be based on incidental
bycatch, including a reduction in bycatch rate (i.e., the proportion of
the stock caught as bycatch).
According to FW 44, for all stocks, with the exception of those
with index-based stock assessments (where no information was provided),
the probability that the ABC catch would result in overfishing (F>Fmsy)
is less than 20 percent. The highest probability of overfishing is
associated with GB winter flounder (0.184, 0.191, and 0.199 for 2010,
2011, and 2012, respectively). The ABC values for GB cod and GB haddock
for FY 2011 and 2012 are maximum values, because no Canadian catch has
been deducted from the overall ABC, and therefore will likely be
specified again in conjunction with the 2011 and 2012 U.S./Canada TACs.
The FY 2011 and 2012 U.S. ABCs for GB cod and GB haddock will therefore
be lower than the values in Table 1 in order to take into account
Canadian catch. For example, for FY 2010, the amount of reduction to
the overall ABC for GB cod and GB haddock was 1,012 mt and 17,612 mt,
respectively, which represent the Canadian portion of the shared TACs
(Table 7).
Table 1--Overfishing Levels and Acceptable Biological Catches for 2010-2012
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFL U.S. ABC
** Stock -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GB cod............................ 6,272 7,311 8,090 3,800 * 5,616 * 6,214
GOM cod........................... 11,089 11,715 11,742 8,530 9,012 9,018
GB hadk........................... 80,007 59,948 51,150 44,903 * 46,784 * 39,846
GOM hadk.......................... 1,617 1,536 1,296 1,265 1,206 1,013
GB ytail.......................... 5,148 6,083 7,094 1,200 1,081 1,226
SNE ytail......................... 1,553 2,174 3,166 493 687 1,003
CC ytail.......................... 1,124 1,355 1,508 863 1,041 1,159
Plaice............................ 4,110 4,483 4,727 3,156 3,444 3,632
Witch............................. 1,239 1,792 2,141 994 1,369 1,639
GB winter......................... 2,660 2,886 3,297 2,052 2,224 2,543
GOM winter........................ 441 570 685 238 238 238
SNE winter........................ 1,568 2,117 2,830 644 897 1,198
Redfish........................... 9,899 10,903 12,036 7,586 8,356 9,224
White hake........................ 4,130 4,805 5,306 2,832 3,295 3,638
Pollock........................... 5,085 5,085 5,085 3,293 3,293 3,293
N. window......................... 225 225 225 169 169 169
S. window......................... 317 317 317 237 237 237
Ocean pout........................ 361 361 361 271 271 271
Halibut........................... 119 130 143 71 78 85
Wolffish.......................... 92 92 92 83 83 83
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
** GB = Georges Bank; GOM = Gulf of Maine; hadk = haddock; ytail = yellowtail flounder; SNE = Southern New
England/Mid-Atlantic; CC = Cape Cod/GOM; plaice = American plaice; witch = witch flounder; winter = winter
flounder; N = north; S = south; window = windowpane flounder.
* Preliminary.
[[Page 5019]]
2. ACLs
Pursuant to Magnuson-Stevens Act requirements and Amendment 16, the
Council recommended ACLs that are lower than the ABCs, in order to
account for management uncertainty. The total ACL for a stock
represents the catch limit for a particular year, considering both
biological and management uncertainty, and the limit includes all
sources of catch (landed and discards) and all fisheries (commercial
and recreational groundfish fishery, state-waters catch, and non-
groundfish fisheries). The division of a single ABC value for each
stock (for a particular FY) into sub-ACLs, and ACL-subcomponents,
accomplishes three objectives: (1) The ABC is sub-divided to account
for all components of the fishery and sources of fishing mortality; (2)
allocations are made for certain fisheries; and (3) management
uncertainty is taken into account.
For FW 44 the ABC was sub-divided into fishery components on a
stock-specific manner, prior to the consideration of management
uncertainty. The following components of the fishery are reflected in
the total ABC: Canadian share/allowance (expected Canadian catch); U.S.
ABC (available to the U.S. fishery after accounting for Canadian
catch); state waters (portion of ABC expected to be caught from state
waters outside Federal management); other sub-components (expected
catch by other non-groundfish fisheries); scallop fishery; mid-water
trawl fishery; commercial groundfish fishery; and recreational
groundfish fishery. The commercial groundfish sub-ACL is further
divided into the non-sector (common pool vessels) sub-ACL and the
sector sub-ACL, based on the total vessel enrollment in all sectors as
of September 1, 2009, and the cumulative Potential Sector Contributions
(PSCs) associated with those sectors, as explained in Amendment 16 and
the proposed rule for sector operations in FY 2010.
As indicated in the proposed rule for sector operations for FY 2010
(74 FR 68015, December 22, 2009), sector rosters will not be finalized
until May 1, 2010, because sectors have until April 30, 2010, to drop
out of a sector and fish in the common pool. Therefore, it is likely
that the FY 2010 sector sub-ACL, which is comprised of the cumulative
PSCs of all enrolled sector members, will be reduced and the common
pool sub-ACL will increase after publication of the final rule
specifying ACLs.
Despite such changes, the groundfish sub-ACL (common pool sub-ACL
plus the sector sub-ACL) would not change. Based on the final rosters,
NMFS intends to publish a rule in early May 2010 to modify these sub-
ACLs, and notify the public if these numbers change. It is almost
certain that all of the FY 2011 and 2012 sub-ACLs for the common pool
and sectors will change and be re-specified prior to FY 2011 and 2012
due to likely annual changes to the sector rosters. Furthermore, due to
the need to re-specify the U.S. ABCs for GB cod and GB haddock as
described above, all sub-components of the ABCs for GB cod and GB
haddock will be re-specified for FY 2011 and 2012, when information on
the Canadian TACs is available.
The numbers in this proposed rule are based on the sector rosters
submitted to NMFS as of September 1, 2009, as indicated in the EA. In
contrast, the proposed Annual Catch Entitlements (ACE) for sectors are
based on rosters as of November 30, 2009. The average difference in the
common pool sub-ACLs between this proposed rule and the sector proposed
rule is 36 percent. The common pool sub-ACLs in the sector proposed
rule are lower than in this proposed rule due to an increase in sector
members between September 1 and November 30, 2009.
The concept of management uncertainty for the purpose of developing
ACLs in Amendment 16, was characterized as the likelihood that
management measures will result in a level of catch that is greater
than the catch objective. In FW 44, management uncertainty was
evaluated for each stock, considering the following elements of the
fishery and the FMP: enforceability; monitoring adequacy; precision of
management tools; latent effort; and catch of groundfish in non-
groundfish fisheries. For most stocks and components of the fishery
(ABC components), the default adjustment (reduction) to the catch level
for a fishery component was 5 percent. For stocks with less management
uncertainty, the adjustment was 3 percent, and for those stocks or
components with more management uncertainty, the adjustment was 7
percent.
For example, the 2010 pollock ABC set by the SSC was 3,813 mt.
Excluding the estimated Canadian pollock catch of 520 mt, the U.S. ABC
in 2010 for pollock amounts to 3,293 mt (Table 1). Approximately 6
percent of the U.S. ABC is used to account for anticipated state-waters
catch (200 mt), 6 percent accounts for anticipated pollock catch by
non-groundfish fisheries (other sub-components), and the remaining
2,893 mt is allocated to the groundfish fishery (3,293 - 200 - 200 =
2,893 mt). To account for management uncertainty, this amount was
reduced by 5 percent (144 mt) from 2,893 mt,, resulting in a groundfish
sub-ACL of 2,748 mt (2,893 - 144 = 2,748 mt) (Table 3).
Several components of the FW 44 ABCs are notable, because they are
atypical. For example, an allocation of yellowtail flounder to the
scallop fishery is proposed in recognition of the importance of
yellowtail flounder to the prosecution of the scallop fishery. For FY
2010, the scallop fishery would be allocated 100 percent of the
estimated yellowtail flounder (for GB and CC/GOM stocks) that is
associated with the projected scallop catch in FY 2010, although this
allocation is not a ``hard'' TAC. For FY 2011 and 2012, NMFS proposes
in FW 44 to allocate to the scallop fishery 90 percent of the
yellowtail flounder the scallop fishery is projected to catch (Table
2). Allocating to the scallop fishery only 90 percent of the yellowtail
flounder that the fishery is expected to catch is intended to
incentivize the scallop fishermen to reduce its bycatch of yellowtail
flounder.
At the January 27, 2010 Council meeting, the Council is expected to
review and possibly reconsider Framework Adjustment 21 (FW 21) to the
Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP (FW 21), which includes measures that
determine the amount of scallops that would be caught during FY 2010.
Because the FW 44 yellowtail flounder allocation to the scallop fishery
is based on the amount of projected scallop harvest, a modification to
FW 21 could affect the proposed FW 44 allocation of yellowtail flounder
to both the scallop and the NE multispecies fisheries. The outcome of
the Council's January 2010, review of FW 21 is unknown at the time this
document was going to publication. However, even if the yellowtail
flounder allocations are not changed in FW 44, a modification of the
scallop management program could change the impacts of the yellowtail
flounder allocations, such that they are different than analyzed in the
FW 44 EA.
The FW 44 EA contains a brief discussion of the potential effects
on the environment, including the human environment, of modifying the
scallop management program. If necessary, the FW 44 EA will be revised
by including supplemental analyses, and the FW 44 final rule would
reflect the revised specifications. For FY 2010, a change in the
Scallop FMP that would allow additional scallop effort, and a
recommendation for a larger allocation of yellowtail flounder, would
result in increased revenue to the scallop fishery
[[Page 5020]]
due to the additional yellowtail landed by scallop vessels. Conversely,
with respect to the groundfish fishery, allocating additional
yellowtail flounder to the scallop fleet would result in lost revenue
for the NE multispecies fishery. Based on FW 21 information, the total
amount of GB and SNE/MA yellowtail flounder allocated to the scallop
fishery could be up to 146 mt and 135 mt, respectively. These amounts
would increase, by 36 mt and 24 mt for GB and SNE/MA yellowtail,
respectively the currently proposed allocations to the scallop fishery.
The EA estimates that the value of each metric ton of yellowtail
flounder to the NE multispecies fishery ranges from a low of $3,296 to
a high of $41,176. Further, the specified allocations of yellowtail
flounder for the scallop fishery may be revised for FY 2011 or 2012,
based on updated scallop and yellowtail flounder stock information, or
on future scallop fishery access area measures.
No specific allocation of CC/GOM yellowtail flounder would be made
to the scallop fishery because the incidental catches of this stock by
the scallop fishery are relatively low. Catches of this stock will be
considered part of the ``other sub-component'' of the ACL.
The FY 2010 yellowtail flounder allocations to the scallop fishery
are characterized as ACL sub-components (no short-term associated AMs),
and the FY 2011 and 2012 allocations are characterized as sub-ACLs.
Under the current Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP, if the scallop fishery
harvests in excess of the yellowtail flounder sub-components specified
for the fishery for FY 2010 (110 mt and 111 mt for GB and SNE/MA,
respectively), no scallop management measures will be triggered. The
Council has decided to develop AMs for the Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP
that would be responsive to yellowtail flounder catches in excess of
the sub-ACL, beginning in FY 2011. The precise mechanism and scope of
future scallop AMs, is unknown. Current regulations set a cap on the
amount of yellowtail flounder that may be harvested from the scallop
access areas from the SNE/MA and GB yellowtail flounder stock areas.
Specifically, current regulations cap yellowtail flounder harvest from
scallop access areas at 10 percent of the ``total TAC'' for each of the
stock areas. In light of the proposed ACL components, ``total TAC''
means ``total ACL'', i.e., 10 percent of 1,169 mt (117 mt) and 468 mt
(47 mt) for FY 2010 for GB and SNE/MA yellowtail flounder, respectively
(see Table 3).
Under this action, the mid-water trawl fishery would be allocated
0.2 percent of the U.S. ABC for GB and GOM haddock. The values for the
allocations to the mid-water trawl fishery listed in Table 2 are
slightly less than 0.2 percent, due to the 7 percent reduction of these
allocations to account for management uncertainty for this stock. To
determine the mid-water trawl fishery's allocation of GB haddock,
therefore, the ABC of 44,903 mt was multiplied by 0.002, and then
reduced by 6.3 mt (44,903 mt X .002 = 89.8 mt; 89.8 mt -6.3 mt = 83.5
mt). For GOM haddock, the ABC of 1,265 mt was multiplied by 0.002, and
then reduced by 0.18 (1,265 mt X .002 = 2.53 mt; 2.53 mt -0.18 mt = 2.4
mt). All the haddock allocations to the mid-water trawl fishery are
characterized as sub-ACLs (associated with AMs, as explained below). A
percentage of the U.S. ABC for GOM haddock and GOM cod would be
allocated to the recreational fishery, based on a split of ABC among
commercial and recreational components of the fishery (72.5 percent and
27.5 percent for haddock; 66.3 percent and 33.7 percent for cod,
respectively)(Table 2). All the recreational allocations to the
groundfish fishery are characterized as sub-ACLs.
Table 2--Allocations to the Scallop Fishery, Mid-Water Trawl Fishery, and Recreational Groundfish Fishery (mt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scallop Fishery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yellowtail flounder stock:
GB.................................................... 110 197 308
SNE/MA................................................ 111 80 126
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mid-Water Trawl Fishery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Haddock stock:
GB.................................................... 84 87 74
GOM................................................... 2 2 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recreational Groundfish Fishery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GOM stock:
GOM cod............................................... 2,673 2,824 2,826
GOM haddock........................................... 324 308 259
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For most stocks the percentage of the ABC deducted for anticipated
catch from state waters is between 1 and 10 percent, with the exception
of Atlantic halibut and GOM winter flounder, for which 50 percent and
35 percent, respectively, are deducted from the ABC.
Amendment 16 would implement a system in which a sub-ACL has an AM
that would be triggered if the catch exceeds the specified amount. In
contrast, an ACL-subcomponent does not have an automatic short-term AM
that is triggered if the catch exceeds the specified amount, although
there would be accountability through the evaluation of the catch of
all sub-components during the next biennial adjustment to determine if
the size of the ACL-subcomponents needs to be adjusted for subsequent
fishing years. However, if the total catch exceeds the total ACL, AMs
would be triggered, as explained in detail in the Amendment 16 proposed
rule. Tables 3, 4, and 5 contain the total ACLs, sub-ACLs, and ACL-
subcomponents for FY 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively (with the
exception of the scallop and mid-water trawl components in Table 2).
The sector sub-ACLs for five stocks are zero, because no
[[Page 5021]]
possession of these stocks is allowed for either common-pool or sector
vessels.
Table 3--Total ACLs, Sub-ACLs, and ACL-Subcomponents for FY 2010 (mt) *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary State waters
Stock Total ACL Groundfish sub- common-pool Preliminary ACL- Other ACL-
ACL sub-ACL sector sub-ACL subcomponent subcomponents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GB cod.................................................. 3,620 3,430 174 3,256 38 152
GOM cod................................................. 8,088 7,240 337 4,230 566 283
GB hadk................................................. 42,768 40,440 1,127 39,313 449 1,796
GOM hadk................................................ 1,197 1,149 39 786 9 37
GB ytail................................................ 1,169 999 65 934 0 60
SNE ytail............................................... 468 322 91 241 5 20
CC ytail................................................ 822 779 52 727 9 35
Plaice.................................................. 3,006 2,848 184 2,665 32 126
Witch................................................... 899 852 42 810 9 38
GB winter............................................... 1,955 1,852 55 1,797 0 103
GOM winter.............................................. 230 158 26 132 60 12
SNE winter.............................................. 605 520 520 0 53 32
Redfish................................................. 7,226 6,848 234 6,613 76 303
White hake.............................................. 2,697 2,566 121 2,435 28 113
Pollock................................................. 3,148 2,748 118 2,630 200 200
N. window............................................... 161 110 110 0 2 49
S. window............................................... 225 154 154 0 2 69
Ocean pout.............................................. 253 239 239 0 3 11
Halibut................................................. 69 30 30 0 36 4
Wolffish................................................ 77 73 73 0 1 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* See Table 2 for allocations to scallop, mid-water trawl, and recreational fisheries.
Table 4--Total ACLs, Sub-ACLs, and ACL-Subcomponents for FY 2011 (mt) *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary State waters
Stock Total ACL Groundfish sub- common-pool Preliminary ACL- Other ACL-
ACL sub-ACL sector sub-ACL subcomponent subcomponents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GB cod.................................................. 5,349 5,068 257 4,812 56 225
GOM cod................................................. 8,545 7,649 356 4,469 597 299
GB hadk................................................. 44,560 42,134 1,174 40,959 468 1,871
GOM hadk................................................ 1,141 1,095 37 749 9 35
GB ytail................................................ 1,050 799 52 747 0 54
SNE ytail............................................... 641 527 144 383 7 27
CC ytail................................................ 992 940 63 867 10 42
Plaice.................................................. 3,280 3,108 200 2,908 34 138
Witch................................................... 1,304 1,236 61 1,174 14 55
GB winter............................................... 2,118 2,007 60 1,948 0 111
GOM winter.............................................. 230 158 26 132 60 12
SNE winter.............................................. 842 726 726 0 72 45
Redfish................................................. 7,959 7,541 257 7,284 84 334
White hake.............................................. 3,138 2,566 141 2,833 33 132
Pollock................................................. 3,148 2,974 118 2,630 200 200
N. window............................................... 161 110 110 0 2 49
S. window............................................... 225 154 154 0 2 69
Ocean pout.............................................. 253 239 239 0 3 11
Halibut................................................. 76 33 33 0 39 4
Wolffish................................................ 77 73 73 0 1 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* See Table 2 for allocations to scallop, mid-water trawl and recreational fisheries.
Table 5--Total ACLs, Sub-ACLs, and ACL-Subcomponents for FY 2012 (mt) *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary State waters
Stock Total ACL Groundfish sub- common-pool Preliminary ACL- Other ACL-
ACL sub-ACL sector sub-ACL subcomponent subcomponents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GB cod.................................................. 5,919 5,608 284 5,324 62 249
GOM cod................................................. 8,551 7,654 356 4,472 598 299
GB hadk................................................. 37,952 35,885 1,000 34,885 398 1,594
GOM hadk................................................ 959 920 31 630 7 29
GB ytail................................................ 1,191 822 53 769 0 61
SNE ytail............................................... 936 760 208 552 10 40
CC ytail................................................ 1,104 1,046 70 976 12 46
Plaice.................................................. 3,459 3,278 211 3,067 36 145
Witch................................................... 1,561 1,479 73 1,406 16 66
GB winter............................................... 2,422 2,295 68 2,227 0 127
[[Page 5022]]
GOM winter.............................................. 230 158 26 132 60 12
SNE winter.............................................. 1,125 969 969 0 96 60
Redfish................................................. 8,786 8,325 284 8,041 92 369
White hake.............................................. 3,465 3,283 156 3,128 36 146
Pollock................................................. 3,148 2,748 118 2,630 200 200
N. window............................................... 161 110 110 0 2 49
S. window............................................... 225 154 154 0 2 69
Ocean pout.............................................. 253 239 239 0 3 11
Halibut................................................. 83 36 36 0 43 4
Wolffish................................................ 77 73 73 0 1 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* See Table 2 for allocations to scallop, mid-water trawl, and recreational fisheries.
3. Revisions to Incidental Catch TACs and Allocations to Special
Management Programs
This proposed rule specifies incidental catch TACs applicable to
the NE multispecies Special Management Programs for FY 2010-2012, based
on the proposed ACLs and the FMP. Incidental catch TACs are specified
for certain stocks of concern for common pool vessels fishing in the
Special Management Programs, in order to limit the amount of catch of
stocks of concern that can be caught under such programs. A stock of
concern is defined as a stock that is in an overfished condition or
subject to overfishing. The Incidental Catch TACs proposed below are
consistent with the proposed Amendment 16 changes to the allocation of
incidental catch TACs among Special Management Programs. Pursuant to
Amendment 16, new incidental catch TACs are required for GOM winter
flounder and pollock, because they are now considered stocks of
concern. Although American plaice is technically no longer a stock of
concern, Amendment 16 retains the incidental catch TAC for this stock
because the stock is far from rebuilt. The incidental catch TACs apply
to catch (landings and discards) caught under Category B DAS (either
Regular or Reserve B DAS) on trips that end on a Category B DAS. The
catch of stocks for which incidental catch TACs are specified on trips
that start under a Category B DAS and then flip to a Category A DAS do
not accrue toward such TACs. Due to the need to re-specify the U.S. ABC
for GB cod, as described above, the incidental catch TAC for GB cod
will be re-specified for FY 2011 and 2012, when information on the
Canadian TACs are available. The incidental catch TACs by stock based
on the common pool sub-ACL are shown in Table 6 below.
Table 6--Incidental Catch TACs by Stock for FY 2010-2012 (mt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of sub- 2010 incidental 2011 incidental 2012 incidental
Stock ACL catch TAC catch TAC catch TAC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GB cod.............................. 2 3.5 5.1 5.7
GOM cod............................. 1 3.4 3.6 3.6
GB yellowtail....................... 2 1.3 1.0 1.1
CC/GOM yellowtail................... 1 0.5 0.6 0.7
SNE/MA yellowtail................... 1 0.9 1.4 2.1
Plaice.............................. 5 9.2 10.0 10.6
Witch flounder...................... 5 2.1 3.1 3.7
SNE/MA winter flounder.............. 1 5.2 7.3 9.7
GB winter........................... 2 1.1 1.2 1.4
White hake.......................... 2 2.4 2.8 3.1
Pollock............................. 2 2.4 2.4 2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 7--Allocation of Incidental Catch TACs Among Special Management Programs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Closed area I Eastern U.S./
Stock Regular B DAS hook gear Canada haddock
program % haddock SAP % SAP %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GB cod.......................................................... 50 16 34
GOM cod......................................................... 100 na na
GB yellowtail................................................... 50 na 50
CC/GOM yellowtail............................................... 100 na na
SNE/MA yellowtail............................................... 100 na na
Plaice.......................................................... 100 na na
Witch flounder.................................................. 100 na na
SNE/MA winter flounder.......................................... 100 na na
GB winter....................................................... 50 na 50
White hake...................................................... 100 na na
Pollock......................................................... 50 16 34
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 5023]]
Table 8--Incidental Catch TACs for Special Management Programs by Stock for FY 2010-2012 (mt)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stock Regular B DAS program Closed area I hook gear Eastern U.S./Canada haddock
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- haddock SAP SAP
-----------------------------------------------------------
2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GB cod........................................................ 1.7 2.6 2.8 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.7 1.9
GOM cod....................................................... 3.4 3.6 3.6 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........
GB yellowtail................................................. 0.6 0.5 0.5 ........ ........ ........ 0.6 0.5 0.5
CC/GOM yellowtail............................................. 0.5 0.6 0.7 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........
SNE/MA yellowtail............................................. 0.9 1.4 2.1 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........
Plaice........................................................ 9.2 10.0 10.6 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........
Witch flounder................................................ 2.1 3.1 3.7 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........
SNE/MA winter flounder........................................ 1.1 1.2 1.4 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........
GB winter..................................................... 1.2 1.4 1.6 ........ ........ ........ 1.2 1.4 1.6
White hake.................................................... 5.2 7.3 9.7 ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........
Pollock....................................................... 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Annual Specifications for U.S./Canada Management Area
The FMP specifies a procedure for setting annual hard TAC levels
(i.e., the fishery or area closes when a TAC is reached) for Eastern GB
cod, Eastern GB haddock, and GB yellowtail flounder in the U.S./Canada
Management Area. The regulations governing the annual development of
TACs were authorized by Amendment 13 to the FMP in order to be
consistent with the U.S./Canada Resource Sharing Understanding
(Understanding), which is an informal understanding between the
Northeast Region of NMFS and the Maritimes Region of the Department of
Fisheries and Ocean of Canada (DFO) that outlines a process for the
management of the shared GB groundfish resources. The Understanding
specifies an allocation of TAC for these three stocks for each country,
based on a formula that considers historical catch percentages and
current resource distribution.
Annual TACs are determined through a process involving the Council,
the Transboundary Management Guidance Committee (TMGC), and the U.S./
Canada Transboundary Resources Steering Committee. In September 2009,
the TMGC approved the 2009 Guidance Document for Eastern GB cod and
Eastern GB haddock, which included recommended U.S. TACs for these
stocks. Although the TMGC also approved the Guidance Document for GB
yellowtail flounder, the TMGC was not able to agree on a shared TAC for
GB yellowtail flounder.
The U.S. delegation proposed 1,500 mt for the shared GB yellowtail
flounder TAC, based on the SSC recommendation. The Canadians supported
a larger shared TAC of 2,700 m. Due to the Magnuson-Stevens Act and FMP
rebuilding plan for GB yellowtail flounder, the United States was
constrained to the lower level it proposed, and the TMGC was unable to
reach a consensus on an appropriate shared catch for GB yellowtail, and
acknowledged this lack of consensus.
The recommended FY 2010 TACs were based on the most recent stock
assessments (TRAC Status Reports for 2009), and the fishing mortality
strategy shared by NMFS, the Department of Fisheries and DFO. The
shared strategy has two parts: (1) To maintain a low to neutral (less
than 50-percent) risk of exceeding the F limit reference (Fref = 0.18,
0.26, and 0.25 for cod, haddock, and yellowtail flounder,
respectively); and (2) when stock conditions are poor, F should be
further reduced to promote rebuilding.
The TMGC concluded that the most appropriate combined U.S./Canada
TAC for Eastern GB cod for FY 2010 is 1,350 mt. A 2010 TAC of 1,350 mt
corresponds to the average of the pertinent two models for a neutral
(50-percent) risk of biomass decline. This corresponds to a low risk
(less than 25-percent) or neutral risk (50-percent) of exceeding the
Fref of 0.18 (i.e., Fmsy) in FY 2010. The annual allocation shares
between countries for FY 2010 are based on a combination of historical
catches (10 percent weighting) and resource distribution based on trawl
surveys (90 percent weighting). Combining these factors entitles the
United States to 25 percent of the shared TAC and Canada to 75-percent,
resulting in a quota of 338 mt for the United States and 1,012 mt for
Canada.
For Eastern GB haddock, the TMGC concluded that the most
appropriate combined U.S./Canada TAC for FY 2010 is 29,600 mt. While
this technically corresponds to the risk-neutral level (of exceeding F
ref of 0.26), which assumes the entire TAC will be caught in FY 2009,
realistically, it represents a low to neutral risk level, because the
anticipated catch in FY 2009 will likely be less than the TAC. The
annual allocation share recommendations between countries for FY 2010
are based on a combination of historical catches (10-percent weighting)
and resource distribution based on trawl surveys (90-percent
weighting). Combining these factors results in recommended allocations
of 40.5 percent of the shared TAC to the United States, and 59.5
percent to Canada, or a quota of 11,988 mt for the U.S. and 17,612 mt
for Canada.
On September 23, 2009, the Council approved, consistent with the
2009 Guidance Document, the following U.S. TACs recommended by the
TMGC: 338 mt of Eastern GB cod and 11,988 mt of Eastern GB haddock. The
Council recommended a U.S. TAC of 1,200 mt for GB yellowtail, based
upon the SSC recommendation of 1,500 mt, minus the anticipated Canadian
catch, estimated at 300 mt. The 300 mt is approximately the 3-year
average of Canadian catch (2008, 2007, 2006; 151 mt, 132 mt, 590 mt,
respectively), based upon TMGC information. The FY 2010 TACs for the
U.S./Canada Management Area represent substantial decreases for cod (36
percent) and yellowtail flounder (43 percent), and an increase for
haddock, compared to the FY 2009 TACs for those species. The final GB
yellowtail flounder sub-ACL proposed for the groundfish fishery (999
mt; Table 3) is lower than the 1,200-mt U.S. TAC, as discussed above,
due to the allocation to the scallop fishery and consideration of
management uncertainty.
[[Page 5024]]
Table 9--2010 U.S./Canada TACs (mt) and Percentage Shares
[In parentheses]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastern GB * GB Yellowtail
Eastern GB Cod Haddock Flounder
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Shared TAC....................................... 1,350 29,600 1,500
U.S. TAC............................................... 338 (25%) 11,988 (40.5%) 1,200
Canada TAC............................................. 1,012 (75%) 17,612 (59.5%) na
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Developed unilaterally by the Council.
The regulations related to the Understanding, promulgated by the
final rule implementing Amendment 13, state that ``any overages of the
GB cod, haddock, or yellowtail flounder TACs that occur in a given
fishing year will be subtracted from the respective TAC in the
following fishing year.'' Therefore, if an analysis of the catch of the
shared stocks by U.S. vessels indicates that an over-harvest occurred
during FY 2009, the pertinent components of the ACL would be adjusted
downward in order to be consistent with the FMP and Understanding
(including the scallop ACL-subcomponent for GB yellowtail flounder).
Although it is very unlikely, it is possible that a very large over-
harvest could result in an adjusted TAC of zero. If an adjustment to
one of the FY 2010 TACs of cod, haddock, or yellowtail flounder is
necessary, it will be done consistent with the Administrative Procedure
Act and the fishing industry will also be notified.
7. U.S./Canada Management Area Initial Measures for FY 2010.
NMFS also proposes to implement, in conjunction with FW 44, and
using existing authority granted to the Regional Administrator under
the FMP, measures to optimize the harvest of the transboundary stocks
managed under the Understanding . The regulations in 50 CFR
648.85(a)(3)(iv)(D) provide the RA the authority to implement inseason
adjustments to various measures in order to prevent over-harvesting, or
to facilitate achieving the TAC.
Although this measure is not included in FW 44, pursuant to the
authority cited above, the Council in November 2009 voted to direct the
RA to postpone the opening of the Eastern U.S./Canada Area for both
sector and non-sector vessels fishing with trawl gear in FY 2010 from
May 1, 2010 to August 1, 2010. Therefore, this action proposes such a
delay. The objective of this measure is to prevent trawl fishing in the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area during the time period when cod bycatch is
likely to be very high, and to prolong access to this area in order to
maximize the catch of available cod, haddock, and yellowtail flounder.
To further constrain fishing mortality on GB cod, NMFS proposes that,
in a manner similar to FYs 2008 and 2009, common pool vessels fishing
with non-trawl gear in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area prior to August 1,
2010, be limited to a cod catch of 5 percent of the Eastern GB cod TAC,
or 16.9 mt of cod. This measure was successful in FYs 2008 and 2009 in
slowing the annual catch rate of cod during the early part of the year.
Second, NMFS is proposing to implement, in conjunction with FW 44,
a possession limit of 2,500 lb (1,125 kg) per trip for GB yellowtail
flounder for common pool vessels to prevent the common pool sub-ACL
from being exceeded. Although the proposed Amendment 16 regulations
would not implement any default initial possession limit for GB
yellowtail flounder (i.e., unlimited at the start of the fishing year),
NMFS is proposing this initial possession limit under its existing
authority, in order to moderate catch to ensure fishing limits are not
exceeding allow harvesting of the sub-ACL by the common pool, and
decrease the likelihood that further restrictions during the FY would
be needed to slow the catch. This possession limit is based on a
recommendation of the Council's Groundfish Plan Development Team for a
low GB yellowtail flounder trip limit, as well as a projected catch
analysis for FY 2010, using current information on vessels that will
fish in the common pool in FY 2010. If necessary, NMFS may modify this
proposed trip limit based upon new information regarding the vessel
composition of the common pool, or revised analytical assumptions.
8. Special Management Program Status for FY 2010
The Regional Administrator has existing authority to allocate trips
into the Closed Area (CA) II Yellowtail Flounder SAP and, for other
special management programs (Regular B DAS Program; CA I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP; and Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP), h