Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 4810-4812 [2010-1860]

Download as PDF jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 4810 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 19 / Friday, January 29, 2010 / Notices review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. On October 13, 2009 (74 FR 52486), EPA sought comments on this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments during the comment period. Any additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this notice. EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA– HQ–OECA–2009–0494, which is available for online viewing at https:// www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1302 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is 202–566–1744, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center is 202–566–1927. Use EPA’s electronic docket and comment system at https:// www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then key in the docket ID number identified above. Please note that EPA’s policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing at https://www.regulations.gov as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, confidential business information (CBI), or other information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For further information about the electronic docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Title: Tips and Complaints Regarding Environmental Violations. ICR Numbers: EPA ICR No. 2219.03, OMB Control No. 2009–0032. ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on 2/28/2010. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or by other VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:49 Jan 28, 2010 Jkt 220001 appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. Abstract: EPA tips and complaints web form is intended to provide an easy and convenient means by which members of the public can supply information to EPA regarding suspected violations of environmental law. The decision to provide a tip or complaint is entirely voluntary and use of the web form when supplying a tip or complaint is also entirely voluntary. Tippers need not supply contact information or other personal identifiers. Those who do supply such information, however, should know that this information may be shared by EPA with appropriate administrative, law enforcement, and judicial entities engaged in investigating or adjudicating the tip or complaint. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average one-half hour per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/Affected Entities: Anyone wishing to file a tip or complaint. Estimated Annual Number of Respondents: 7,560. Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 3,780. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $75,146. Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase of 1980 hours in the total estimated respondent burden compared with that identified in the ICR currently approved by OMB. This increase reflects the fact that tips and complaints are being filed at a higher rate than originally anticipated, a strong indication of the success of this program. There has been no change in the information being reported or the estimated burden per respondent. PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: January 21, 2010. John Moses, Director, Collection Strategies Division. [FR Doc. 2010–1855 Filed 1–28–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–8987–8] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 202–564–7146 or https://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated July 17, 2009 (74 FR 34754). Notice In accordance with Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to make its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies public. Historically, EPA has met this mandate by publishing weekly notices of availability of EPA comments, which includes a brief summary of EPA’s comment letters, in the Federal Register. Since February 2008, EPA has been including its comment letters on EISs on its Web site at: https:// www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/ eisdata.html. Including the entire EIS comment letters on the Web site satisfies the Section 309(a) requirement to make EPA’s comments on EISs available to the public. Accordingly, after March 31, 2010, EPA will discontinue the publication of this notice of availability of EPA comments in the Federal Register. Draft EISs EIS No. 20080460, ERP No. D–FHW– J40186–CO, I–70 East Project, Transportation Improvement from I– 70 East from 1–25 to Tower Road, Funding, City and County Denver, CO. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about air quality impacts. EPA recommended additional mitigation for PM10 impacts, dispersion modeling and possible additional mitigation for MSAT impacts. Rating EC2. E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 19 / Friday, January 29, 2010 / Notices EIS No. 20090058, ERP No. D–AFS– J65534–MT, Miller West Fisher Project, Proposes Land Management Activities, including Timber Harvest, Access Management, Road Storage and Decommissioning, Prescribed Burning and Precommercial Thinning, Miller Creek, West Fisher Creek and the Silver Butte Fisher River, Libby Ranger District, Kootenai National Forest, Lincoln County, MT. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about channel stability in Miller Creek as a result of water yield increases from proposed timber harvests, and noted the need to assure project consistency with TMDL preparation in the watershed of the water quality impaired Fisher River. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20090196, ERP No. D–SFW– J99043–MT, Montana Department of Natural and Resources and Conservation Plan (HCP), Forested State Trust Lands, Designed to Minimize and Mitigate any such Take of Endangered or Threatened Species, Application for an Incidental Take Permit, MT. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about impacts to water quality, aquatic habitat, aquatic ecological functions, and recommended additional protections and commitments to provide more comprehensive protection. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20090257, ERP No. D–BLM– J65545–SD, Dewey Conveyor Project, To Transport Limestone from a Future Quarry Location to a Rail Load-Out Facility near Dewey, Application for Transportation and Utility Systems and Facilities on Federal Lands, Custer County, SD. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about air quality impacts, especially regarding connected action sources including the limestone quarry and subsequent mining activities that would likely have significant particulate emissions. EPA also requested additional information on water resources in the project and quarry areas. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20090371, ERP No. D–NPS– E65086–KY, Cumberland Gap National Historical Park, General Management Plan, Implementation, Middlesboro, KY. Summary: While EPA has no objection to the proposed action, EPA did recommend additional monitoring activities to ensure that the increase in hardened access areas and likely subsequent increase in recreational and educational usage of the park do not VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:49 Jan 28, 2010 Jkt 220001 negatively impact natural and cultural resources. Rating LO. EIS No. 20090388, ERP No. D–AFS– L65524–0R, Fremont-Winema National Forests Invasive Plant Treatment, Propose to Treat up to 8,700 Acres of Invasive Plant Infestation Per Year, Klamath and Lake Counties, OR. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about monitoring and adaptive Management issues. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20090407, ERP No. D–NOA– L91034–00, Rationalization of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Limited Entry Trawl Fishery, Amendment 20, Implementation, WA, OR and CA. Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO. EIS No. 20090418, ERP No. D–COE– E39078–NC, The Town of Nags Head Beach Nourishment Project, Propose to Utilize a Self-Contained Hooper Dredge and Other Feasible Dredging Equipment during a Proposed Construction Window from April through September, Dare County, NC. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about the use of hopper dredges and their potential effect on marine and threatened and endangered resources. EPA has requested that the Final SEIS include the finalized mitigation plan, the finalized sea turtle protocol, the map of the final borrow areas, and some representative boring logs from the selected final borrow areas. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20090410, ERP No. DS–IBR– K36146–CA, Mormon Island Auxiliary Dam Modification Project, Addressing Hydrologic, Seismic, Static, and Flood Management Issues, Sacramento and El Dorado Counties, CA. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about construction air quality impacts, exposure to Naturally Occurring Asbestos, and impacts to vernal pools, wetlands, and riparian habitat. EPA recommended continued coordination with Air Quality Management Districts, inclusion of the Section 404 Permit for the Folsom Dam Safety/Flood Damage Reduction Project, and a description of the 404 permit amendments for the MIAD Modification Project. Rating EC2. Final EISs EIS No. 20090078, ERP No. F–NIH– J81013–MT, Rocky Mountain Laboratories (RML) Master Plan, Implementation, Hamilton, Ravalli County, MT. PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4811 Summary: EPA’s previous concerns have been resolved; therefore, EPA has no objection to the proposed action. EIS No. 20090339, ERP No. F–AFS– J65539–00, Ashley National Forest Motorized Travel Plan, To Improve Management of Public Summer Motorized Use by Designating Roads and Motorized Trails and Limiting Dispersed Camping to Areas, Duchesne, Daggett, Uintah Counties, Utah and Sweetwater County, Wyoming. Summary: The preparing agencies responded adequately to EPA’s comments on the DEIS. There are no continuing significant issues. EIS No. 20090366, ERP No. F–FHW– J40177–CO, US–36 Corridor, MultiModal Transportation Improvements between I–25 in Adams County and Foothills Parkway/Table Mesa Drive in Boulder, Adams, Denver, Broomfield, Boulder and Jefferson Counties, CO. Summary: EPA continues to express environmental concern about water quality impacts. EPA recommended long-term monitoring and maintenance of storm water best management practices. EPA requested clarification of air quality discussion related to particulate matter emissions be included in the record of decision. EIS No. 20090416, ERP No. F–UMC– E11070–NC, U.S. Marine Corps Grow the Force at MCB Camp Lejeune, MCAS New River, and MCAS Cherry Point, To Provide the Infrastructure to Support the Permanent Increases at these three Installations, US Army Corps Section 404 and 10 Permits, City of Jacksonville, NC. Summary: EPA recommended that a comprehensive alternative transportation program be developed to assist the area in meeting air quality standards in the future. EIS No. 20090433, ERP No. F–AFS– K65366–CA, Lassen National Forest, Motorized Travel Management Plan, Implementation, Butte, Lassen, Modoc, Plumas, Shasta, Siskiyou, Tehama Counties, CA. Summary: EPA continues to express environmental concerns about impacts to water quality and sensitive resources. EIS No. 20090444, ERP No. F–USA– G11051–NM, White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), Development and Implementation of Range-Wide Mission and Major Capabilities, NM. Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. EIS No. 20090441, ERP No. FS–FHW– E40768–TN, Shelby Avenue/ Demonbreun Street (Gateway Boulevard E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 4812 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 19 / Friday, January 29, 2010 / Notices Corridor, from I–65 North [I–24 West] to I–40 West in Downtown Nashville, To Address Transportation needs in the Study Area. Davidson County, TN. Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns about MSAT impacts. Dated: January 26, 2010. Ken Mittelholtz, Deputy Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. 2010–1860 Filed 1–28–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–8987–7] Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564–1399 or https://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/. Weekly Receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed 01/18/2010 Through 01/22/2010 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Notice In accordance with Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to make its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies public. Historically, EPA has met this mandate by publishing weekly notices of availability of EPA comments, which includes a brief summary of EPA’s comment letters, in the Federal Register. Since February 2008, EPA has been including its comment letters on EISs on its Web site at: https:// www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/ eisdata.html. Including the entire EIS comment letters on the website satisfies the Section 309(a) requirement to make EPA’s comments on EISs available to the public. Accordingly, after March 31, 2010, EPA will discontinue the publication of this notice of availability of EPA comments in the Federal Register. EIS No. 20100017, Draft EIS, NOAA, 00, Amendment 21 to the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan, (FMP), Allocation of Harvest Opportunity between Sectors, Implementation, WA, OR and CA, Comment Period Ends: 03/15/2010, Contact: Barry A. Thom 206–516– 6150. EIS No. 20100018, Draft EIS, NPS, WV, New River Gorge National River Project, General Management Plan, Implementation, Fayette, Raleigh and VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:49 Jan 28, 2010 Jkt 220001 Summers Counties, WV, Comment Period Ends: 03/29/2010, Contact: Deborah Darden 304–465–6509. EIS No. 20100019, Final EIS, DOE, NY, West Valley Demonstration Project and Western New York Nuclear Service Center Decommissioning and/ or Long-Term Stewardship, (DOE/ EIS–0226–D Revised) City of Buffalo, Eric and Cattaraugus Counties, NY, Wait Period Ends: 03/01/2010, Contact: Catherine Bohan 716–942– 4159. EIS No. 20100020, Final EIS, FTA, TX, University Corridor Fixed Guideway Project, To Implement Transit Improvements from Hillcroft Transit Center to the Vicinity of the University of Houston (UH)—Central Campus or the Eastwood Transit Center, City of Houston, Harris County, TX, Wait Period Ends: 03/01/ 2010, Contact: Laura Wallace 817– 978–0561. EIS No. 20100021, Final EIS, BR, CA, Folsom Lake State Recreation Area & Folsom Powerhouse State Historic Park, General Plan/Resource Management Plan, Implementation, Placer County, CA, Wait Period Ends: 03/01/2010, Contact: Walter Clevenger 916–989–7173. EIS No. 20100022, Draft EIS, DOE, 00, Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Storage Project, Designate a Facility or Facilities for Mercy Storage, Seven Alternative Sites, CO, ID, MO, NV, SC and WA, Comment Period Ends: 03/29/2010, Contact: David Levenstein 301–903– 6500. EIS No. 20100023, Final EIS, USFS, 00, Klamath National Forest Motorized Route Designation, Motorized Travel Management, (Formerly Motorized Route Designation), Implementation, Siskiyou County, CA and Jackson County, OR, Wait Period Ends: 03/01/ 2010, Contact: Jan Ford 530–841– 4483. Dated: January 26, 2010. Ken Mittelholtz, Deputy Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. 2010–1859 Filed 1–28–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–HQ–OECA–2010–0024; FRL–9107–8] Inquiry To Learn Whether Businesses Assert Business Confidentiality Claims AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice; request for comment. PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) receives from time to time Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for documentation received or issued by EPA or data contained in EPA database systems pertaining to the export and import of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste from/to the United States, the export of cathode ray tubes (CRTs) from the United States, and the export and import of RCRA universal waste from/to the United States. These documents and data may identify or reference multiple parties, and describe transactions involving the movement of specified materials in which the parties propose to participate or have participated. The purpose of this notice is to inform ‘‘affected businesses’’ about the documents or data sought by these types of FOIA requests in order to provide the businesses with the opportunity to assert claims that any of the information sought that pertains to them is entitled to treatment as confidential business information (CBI), and to send comments to EPA supporting their claims for such treatment. Certain businesses, however, do not meet the definition of ‘‘affected business,’’ and are not covered by today’s notice. They consist of any business that actually submitted to EPA any document at issue pursuant to applicable RCRA regulatory requirements and did not assert a CBI claim as to information that pertains to that business in connection with the document at the time of its submission; they have waived their right to do so at a later time. Nevertheless, other businesses identified or referenced in the documents that were submitted to EPA by the submitting business may have a right to assert a CBI claim concerning information that pertains to them and may do so in response to this notice. DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 1, 2010. The period for submission of comments may be extended if, before the comments are due, you make a request for an extension of the comment period and it is approved by the EPA legal office. Except in extraordinary circumstances, the EPA legal office will not approve such an extension without the consent of any person whose request for release of the information under the FOIA is pending. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OECA–2010–0024, by one of the following methods: E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 19 (Friday, January 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4810-4812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1860]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-8987-8]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental 
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and 
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. 
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of 
Federal Activities at 202-564-7146 or https://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
    An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated July 17, 2009 (74 FR 
34754).

Notice

    In accordance with Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act, EPA is 
required to make its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies 
public. Historically, EPA has met this mandate by publishing weekly 
notices of availability of EPA comments, which includes a brief summary 
of EPA's comment letters, in the Federal Register. Since February 2008, 
EPA has been including its comment letters on EISs on its Web site at: 
https://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.
    Including the entire EIS comment letters on the Web site satisfies 
the Section 309(a) requirement to make EPA's comments on EISs available 
to the public. Accordingly, after March 31, 2010, EPA will discontinue 
the publication of this notice of availability of EPA comments in the 
Federal Register.

Draft EISs

EIS No. 20080460, ERP No. D-FHW-J40186-CO, I-70 East Project, 
Transportation Improvement from I-70 East from 1-25 to Tower Road, 
Funding, City and County Denver, CO.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about air quality 
impacts. EPA recommended additional mitigation for PM10 impacts, 
dispersion modeling and possible additional mitigation for MSAT 
impacts. Rating EC2.


[[Page 4811]]


EIS No. 20090058, ERP No. D-AFS-J65534-MT, Miller West Fisher Project, 
Proposes Land Management Activities, including Timber Harvest, Access 
Management, Road Storage and Decommissioning, Prescribed Burning and 
Precommercial Thinning, Miller Creek, West Fisher Creek and the Silver 
Butte Fisher River, Libby Ranger District, Kootenai National Forest, 
Lincoln County, MT.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about channel 
stability in Miller Creek as a result of water yield increases from 
proposed timber harvests, and noted the need to assure project 
consistency with TMDL preparation in the watershed of the water quality 
impaired Fisher River. Rating EC2.

EIS No. 20090196, ERP No. D-SFW-J99043-MT, Montana Department of 
Natural and Resources and Conservation Plan (HCP), Forested State Trust 
Lands, Designed to Minimize and Mitigate any such Take of Endangered or 
Threatened Species, Application for an Incidental Take Permit, MT.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about impacts to water 
quality, aquatic habitat, aquatic ecological functions, and recommended 
additional protections and commitments to provide more comprehensive 
protection. Rating EC2.

EIS No. 20090257, ERP No. D-BLM-J65545-SD, Dewey Conveyor Project, To 
Transport Limestone from a Future Quarry Location to a Rail Load-Out 
Facility near Dewey, Application for Transportation and Utility Systems 
and Facilities on Federal Lands, Custer County, SD.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about air quality 
impacts, especially regarding connected action sources including the 
limestone quarry and subsequent mining activities that would likely 
have significant particulate emissions. EPA also requested additional 
information on water resources in the project and quarry areas. Rating 
EC2.

EIS No. 20090371, ERP No. D-NPS-E65086-KY, Cumberland Gap National 
Historical Park, General Management Plan, Implementation, Middlesboro, 
KY.

    Summary: While EPA has no objection to the proposed action, EPA did 
recommend additional monitoring activities to ensure that the increase 
in hardened access areas and likely subsequent increase in recreational 
and educational usage of the park do not negatively impact natural and 
cultural resources. Rating LO.

EIS No. 20090388, ERP No. D-AFS-L65524-0R, Fremont-Winema National 
Forests Invasive Plant Treatment, Propose to Treat up to 8,700 Acres of 
Invasive Plant Infestation Per Year, Klamath and Lake Counties, OR.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about monitoring and 
adaptive Management issues. Rating EC2.

EIS No. 20090407, ERP No. D-NOA-L91034-00, Rationalization of the 
Pacific Coast Groundfish Limited Entry Trawl Fishery, Amendment 20, 
Implementation, WA, OR and CA.

    Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.

EIS No. 20090418, ERP No. D-COE-E39078-NC, The Town of Nags Head Beach 
Nourishment Project, Propose to Utilize a Self-Contained Hooper Dredge 
and Other Feasible Dredging Equipment during a Proposed Construction 
Window from April through September, Dare County, NC.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about the use of 
hopper dredges and their potential effect on marine and threatened and 
endangered resources. EPA has requested that the Final SEIS include the 
finalized mitigation plan, the finalized sea turtle protocol, the map 
of the final borrow areas, and some representative boring logs from the 
selected final borrow areas. Rating EC2.

EIS No. 20090410, ERP No. DS-IBR-K36146-CA, Mormon Island Auxiliary Dam 
Modification Project, Addressing Hydrologic, Seismic, Static, and Flood 
Management Issues, Sacramento and El Dorado Counties, CA.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about construction 
air quality impacts, exposure to Naturally Occurring Asbestos, and 
impacts to vernal pools, wetlands, and riparian habitat. EPA 
recommended continued coordination with Air Quality Management 
Districts, inclusion of the Section 404 Permit for the Folsom Dam 
Safety/Flood Damage Reduction Project, and a description of the 404 
permit amendments for the MIAD Modification Project. Rating EC2.

Final EISs

EIS No. 20090078, ERP No. F-NIH-J81013-MT, Rocky Mountain Laboratories 
(RML) Master Plan, Implementation, Hamilton, Ravalli County, MT.

    Summary: EPA's previous concerns have been resolved; therefore, EPA 
has no objection to the proposed action.

EIS No. 20090339, ERP No. F-AFS-J65539-00, Ashley National Forest 
Motorized Travel Plan, To Improve Management of Public Summer Motorized 
Use by Designating Roads and Motorized Trails and Limiting Dispersed 
Camping to Areas, Duchesne, Daggett, Uintah Counties, Utah and 
Sweetwater County, Wyoming.

    Summary: The preparing agencies responded adequately to EPA's 
comments on the DEIS. There are no continuing significant issues.

EIS No. 20090366, ERP No. F-FHW-J40177-CO, US-36 Corridor, Multi-Modal 
Transportation Improvements between I-25 in Adams County and Foothills 
Parkway/Table Mesa Drive in Boulder, Adams, Denver, Broomfield, Boulder 
and Jefferson Counties, CO.

    Summary: EPA continues to express environmental concern about water 
quality impacts. EPA recommended long-term monitoring and maintenance 
of storm water best management practices. EPA requested clarification 
of air quality discussion related to particulate matter emissions be 
included in the record of decision.

EIS No. 20090416, ERP No. F-UMC-E11070-NC, U.S. Marine Corps Grow the 
Force at MCB Camp Lejeune, MCAS New River, and MCAS Cherry Point, To 
Provide the Infrastructure to Support the Permanent Increases at these 
three Installations, US Army Corps Section 404 and 10 Permits, City of 
Jacksonville, NC.

Summary: EPA recommended that a comprehensive alternative 
transportation program be developed to assist the area in meeting air 
quality standards in the future.

EIS No. 20090433, ERP No. F-AFS-K65366-CA, Lassen National Forest, 
Motorized Travel Management Plan, Implementation, Butte, Lassen, Modoc, 
Plumas, Shasta, Siskiyou, Tehama Counties, CA.

    Summary: EPA continues to express environmental concerns about 
impacts to water quality and sensitive resources.

EIS No. 20090444, ERP No. F-USA-G11051-NM, White Sands Missile Range 
(WSMR), Development and Implementation of Range-Wide Mission and Major 
Capabilities, NM.

    Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. 
EIS No. 20090441, ERP No. FS-FHW-E40768-TN, Shelby Avenue/Demonbreun 
Street (Gateway Boulevard

[[Page 4812]]

Corridor, from I-65 North [I-24 West] to I-40 West in Downtown 
Nashville, To Address Transportation needs in the Study Area. Davidson 
County, TN.

    Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns about MSAT 
impacts.


    Dated: January 26, 2010.
Ken Mittelholtz,
Deputy Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2010-1860 Filed 1-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.