Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Renewals; Vision, 4625-4626 [2010-1765]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2010 / Notices
Application of Multiple Regression
Analysis of a Poisson Process,’’ Journal
of the American Statistical Association,
June 1971). A 1964 California Driver
Record Study prepared by the California
Department of Motor Vehicles
concluded that the best overall crash
predictor for both concurrent and
nonconcurrent events is the number of
single convictions. This study used 3
consecutive years of data, comparing the
experiences of drivers in the first 2 years
with their experiences in the final year.
Applying principles from these
studies to the past 3-year record of the
27 applicants, one of the applicants had
a traffic violation for speeding, one of
the applicants had a traffic violation for
failure to obey a traffic sign and another
had a traffic violation for failure to yield
the right of way to another vehicle, and
one applicant was involved in a crash.
The applicants achieved this record of
safety while driving with their vision
impairment, demonstrating the
likelihood that they have adapted their
driving skills to accommodate their
condition. As the applicants’ ample
driving histories with their vision
deficiencies are good predictors of
future performance, FMCSA concludes
their ability to drive safely can be
projected into the future.
We believe that the applicants’
intrastate driving experience and history
provide an adequate basis for predicting
their ability to drive safely in interstate
commerce. Intrastate driving, like
interstate operations, involves
substantial driving on highways on the
interstate system and on other roads
built to interstate standards. Moreover,
driving in congested urban areas
exposes the driver to more pedestrian
and vehicular traffic than exists on
interstate highways. Faster reaction to
traffic and traffic signals is generally
required because distances between
them are more compact. These
conditions tax visual capacity and
driver response just as intensely as
interstate driving conditions. The
veteran drivers in this proceeding have
operated CMVs safely under those
conditions for at least 3 years, most for
much longer. Their experience and
driving records lead us to believe that
each applicant is capable of operating in
interstate commerce as safely as he/she
has been performing in intrastate
commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds
that exempting these applicants from
the vision standard in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption. For this reason, the
Agency is granting the exemptions for
the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to the 27 applicants
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:16 Jan 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
listed in the notice of November 19,
2009 (74 FR 60022).
We recognize that the vision of an
applicant may change and affect his/her
ability to operate a CMV as safely as in
the past. As a condition of the
exemption, therefore, FMCSA will
impose requirements on the 27
individuals consistent with the
grandfathering provisions applied to
drivers who participated in the
Agency’s vision waiver program.
Those requirements are found at 49
CFR 391.64(b) and include the
following: (1) That each individual be
physically examined every year (a) by
an ophthalmologist or optometrist who
attests that the vision in the better eye
continues to meet the standard in 49
CFR 391.41(b)(10), and (b) by a medical
examiner who attests that the individual
is otherwise physically qualified under
49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual
provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s
or optometrist’s report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual
medical examination; and (3) that each
individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for
retention in the driver’s qualification
file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s
qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a
copy of the certification when driving,
for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement
official.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this
proceeding.
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 27
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts Teddy S. Bioni, John K. Butler,
James J. Coffield, Roy E. Crayne, Ralph
G. DeBardi, James A. DuBay, Chad D.
Grose, Donald E. Halvorson, Gerald
Harrison, Roger D. Kool, Curtis M.
Lawless, Michael E. Lindquist, Philip
J.C. Locke, Travis J. Luce, Cameron S.
McMillen, Carl L. Miles, Rashawn L.
Morris, Brian T. Nelson, James C. New,
Thomas E. O’Compo, Christopher M.
Rivera, Richard J. Robb, Larry L. Sapp,
Temesgn H. Teklezig, Robert E.
Whitney, Robert D. Williams, and James
M. Wood from the vision requirement in
49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), subject to the
requirements cited above (49 CFR
391.64(b)).
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each exemption will be valid
for 2 years unless revoked earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked
if: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the
exemption; (2) the exemption has
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4625
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
If the exemption is still effective at the
end of the 2-year period, the person may
apply to FMCSA for a renewal under
procedures in effect at that time.
Issued on: January 11, 2010.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–1766 Filed 1–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–1999–5578; FMCSA–
1999–5748; FMCSA–2001–9258; FMCSA–
2002–12844; FMCSA–2003–15892; FMCSA–
2005–21711]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Renewals; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION:
Notice of final disposition.
SUMMARY: FMCSA previously
announced its decision to renew the
exemptions from the vision requirement
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations for 22 individuals. FMCSA
has statutory authority to exempt
individuals from the vision requirement
if the exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has
concluded that granting these
exemptions will provide a level of safety
that will be equivalent to, or greater
than, the level of safety maintained
without the exemptions for these
commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64–
224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://
www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
4626
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2010 / Notices
Background
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ The statute also
allows the Agency to renew exemptions
at the end of the 2-year period. The
comment period ended on December 30,
2009 (74 FR 62632).
Order Granting a Temporary
Exemption From Certain Government
Securities Act Provisions and
Regulations in Connection With a
Request From ICE Trust U.S. LLC
Related to Central Clearing of Credit
Default Swaps, and Request for
Comments
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this
proceeding.
Conclusion
The Agency has not received any
adverse evidence on any of these drivers
that indicates that safety is being
compromised. Based upon its
evaluation of the 22 renewal
applications, FMCSA renews the
Federal vision exemptions for Thomas
E. Adams, Terry J. Aldridge, Lennie D.
Baker, Jr., Jerry D. Bridges, William J.
Corder, Gary R. Gutschow, Richard J.
Hanna, James J. Hewitt, Albert E.
Malley, Eugene P. Martin, David L.
Menken, Rodney M. Mimbs, Walter F.
Moniowczak, William G. Mote, James R.
Murphy, Chris A. Ritenour, Ronald L.
Roy, Thomas D. Walden, Thomas E.
Walsh, Kevin P. Weinhold, Charles M.
Wilkins and Thomas A. Wise.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each renewal exemption will
be valid for 2 years unless revoked
earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will
be revoked if: (1) The person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
Issued on: January 22, 2010.
Charles A. Horan III,
Acting Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–1765 Filed 1–27–10; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:16 Jan 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
AGENCY: Department of the Treasury,
Office of the Under Secretary for
Domestic Finance.
ACTION: Notice of temporary exemption.
SUMMARY: The Department of the
Treasury (Treasury) is issuing a
temporary exemption from certain
Government Securities Act of 1986
provisions and regulations in
connection with a request from ICE
Trust U.S. LLC to accommodate
customer clearing of credit default
swaps that reference government
securities. Treasury is also soliciting
public comment on this order.
DATES: Effective Date: January 28, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori
Santamorena, Lee Grandy, or Kevin
Hawkins, Bureau of the Public Debt,
Department of the Treasury, at 202–
504–3632.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is Treasury’s order providing
a temporary exemption:
I. Introduction
Treasury regulates transactions in
government securities 1 by government
securities brokers 2 and government
securities dealers 3 under Section 15C of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Exchange Act), as amended by the
Government Securities Act of 1986
(GSA). These regulations impose
obligations concerning financial
responsibility, protection of customer
securities and balances, and
recordkeeping and reporting.
On March 6, 2009, Treasury granted
temporary exemptions 4 from certain
1 The term government securities is defined at 15
U.S.C. 78c(a)(42).
2 A government securities broker generally is ‘‘any
person regularly engaged in the business of
effecting transactions in government securities for
the account of others,’’ with certain exclusions. 15
U.S.C. 78c(a)(43).
3 A government securities dealer generally is ‘‘any
person engaged in the business of buying and
selling government securities for his own account,
through a broker or otherwise,’’ with certain
exclusions. 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(44).
4 74 FR 10647, March 11, 2009 Order Granting
Temporary Exemptions from Certain Provisions of
the Government Securities Act and Treasury’s
Government Securities Act Regulations in
Connection with a Request on Behalf of ICE US
Trust LLC Related to Central Clearing of Credit
Default Swaps, and Request for Comments,
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
GSA provisions and regulations to ICE
Trust U.S. LLC, formerly ICE US Trust
LLC (ICE Trust), certain ICE Trust
participants, and certain eligible
contract participants (ECPs)5 (the March
6, 2009 order). On December 7, 2009,
Treasury extended the expiration date of
these exemptions until March 7, 2010
(the December 7, 2009 order),6 in
response to a request from ICE Trust
(the request).7
ICE Trust also requested that Treasury
grant supplemental exemptive relief to
permit the clearance of credit default
swaps (CDS)8 transactions on behalf of
customers of ICE Trust clearing
members. ICE Trust requested an
exemption for clearing members,
including certain entities affiliated with
ICE Trust clearing members,9 from
provisions of the Exchange Act
governing government securities
transactions, to the extent such
provisions would otherwise apply to
such clearing members in regard to
cleared CDS.10
available at: https://www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/
statreg/gsareg/gsareq_treasexemptiveorder309.pdf.
5 ECPs are defined in Section 1a(12) of the
Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 1 et seq. The
use of the term ECPs in this order refers to the
definition of ECPs as in effect on the date of this
order, and excludes persons that are ECPs under
Section 1a(12)(C). The temporary exemption
provided to ECPs in this order also applies to
interdealer brokers that are ECPs.
6 74 FR 64127, December 7, 2009 Order Extending
Temporary Exemptions from Certain Government
Securities Act Provisions and Regulations in
Connection with a Request from ICE Trust U.S. LLC
Related to Central Clearing of Credit Default Swaps,
available at: https://www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/
statreg/gsareg/
FR_Treasury_Order_ICE_Extension_(12–7–09).pdf.
7 Letter from Kevin McClear, General Counsel,
ICE Trust to the Commissioner of the Public Debt,
Van Zeck, December 3, 2009, available at https://
www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/statreg/gsareg/
gsareg.htm.
8 A CDS is a bilateral contract between two
parties, known as counterparties. The value of this
financial contract is based on underlying
obligations of a single entity (‘‘reference entity’’) or
on a particular security or other debt obligation, or
an index of several such entities, securities, or
obligations. The obligation of a seller to make
payments under a CDS contract is triggered by a
default or other credit event as to such entity or
entities or such security or securities. Investors may
use CDS for a variety of reasons, including to offset
or insure against risk in their fixed-income
portfolios, to take positions in bonds or in segments
of the debt market as represented by an index, or
to take positions on the volatility in credit spreads
during times of economic uncertainty.
9 ICE Trust stated that, for purposes of its request,
an affiliate means an entity that directly, or
indirectly through one or more intermediaries,
controls or is controlled by, or that is under
common control with, a clearing member.
10 For purposes of this order, cleared CDS means
a credit default swap that is submitted (or offered,
purchased, or sold on terms providing for
submission) to ICE Trust, that is offered only to,
purchased only by, and sold only to ECPs (as
defined in Section 1a(12) of the Commodity
Exchange Act as in effect on the date of this order
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 18 (Thursday, January 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4625-4626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1765]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-1999-5578; FMCSA-1999-5748; FMCSA-2001-9258; FMCSA-
2002-12844; FMCSA-2003-15892; FMCSA-2005-21711]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Renewals; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA previously announced its decision to renew the
exemptions from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations for 22 individuals. FMCSA has statutory authority to
exempt individuals from the vision requirement if the exemptions
granted will not compromise safety. The Agency has concluded that
granting these exemptions will provide a level of safety that will be
equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety maintained without
the exemptions for these commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202) 366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64-224, Washington,
DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://www.regulations.gov.
[[Page 4626]]
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
for a 2-year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that
would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also allows the
Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period. The comment
period ended on December 30, 2009 (74 FR 62632).
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this proceeding.
Conclusion
The Agency has not received any adverse evidence on any of these
drivers that indicates that safety is being compromised. Based upon its
evaluation of the 22 renewal applications, FMCSA renews the Federal
vision exemptions for Thomas E. Adams, Terry J. Aldridge, Lennie D.
Baker, Jr., Jerry D. Bridges, William J. Corder, Gary R. Gutschow,
Richard J. Hanna, James J. Hewitt, Albert E. Malley, Eugene P. Martin,
David L. Menken, Rodney M. Mimbs, Walter F. Moniowczak, William G.
Mote, James R. Murphy, Chris A. Ritenour, Ronald L. Roy, Thomas D.
Walden, Thomas E. Walsh, Kevin P. Weinhold, Charles M. Wilkins and
Thomas A. Wise.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each renewal
exemption will be valid for 2 years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA.
The exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was
granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
Issued on: January 22, 2010.
Charles A. Horan III,
Acting Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-1765 Filed 1-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P