New Postal Product, 4593-4594 [2010-1752]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2010 / Notices
appraisal system that has not been
certified.
The minimum rate of basic pay for the
senior-level (SL) and scientific and
professional (ST) rate range was
increased by 1.5 percent ($119,554 in
2010), which is the amount of the
across-the-board GS increase. The
applicable maximum rate of the SL/ST
rate range is level II of the Executive
Schedule ($179,700 in 2010) for SL or
ST employees covered by a certified SL/
ST performance appraisal system and
level III of the Executive Schedule
($165,300 in 2010) for SL or ST
employees covered by an SL/ST
performance appraisal system that has
not been certified. Agencies with
certified performance appraisal systems
in 2010 for SES members and
employees in SL and ST positions also
must apply a higher aggregate limitation
on pay—up to the Vice President’s
salary ($230,700 in 2010).
By law, SES members and employees
in SL and ST positions are not
authorized to receive locality payments.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Note: An exception applies to SES, SL, and
ST employees stationed in a nonforeign area
on January 2, 2010, which is explained in an
OPM memorandum, CPM 2009–27. (See
https://www.opm.gov/oca/compmemo/
index.asp.)
The Executive order adjusted the rates
of basic pay for administrative law
judges (ALJs) by 1.5 percent, rounded to
the nearest $100. The maximum rate of
basic pay for ALJs is set by law at the
rate for level IV of the Executive
Schedule, which is now $155,500. The
rate of basic pay for AL–2 is $151,800.
The rates of basic pay for AL–3/A
through 3/F range from $103,900 to
$143,700. (See 5 U.S.C. 5372.)
The rates of basic pay for members of
Contract Appeals Boards are calculated
as a percentage of the rate for level IV
of the Executive Schedule. (See 5 U.S.C.
5372a.) Therefore, these rates of basic
pay were increased by approximately
1.5 percent.
On October 23, 2009, the President’s
Pay Agent extended the 2010 localitybased comparability payments to certain
categories of non-GS employees. The
Governmentwide categories include
ALJs and Contract Appeals Board
members. The maximum locality rate of
pay for these employees is the rate for
level III of the Executive Schedule
($165,300 in 2010).
On December 23, 2009, OPM issued a
memorandum (CPM 2009–23) on the
January 2010 pay adjustments. (See
https://www.opm.gov/oca/compmemo/
index.asp.) The memorandum
transmitted Executive Order 13525 and
provided the 2010 salary tables, locality
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:16 Jan 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
pay areas and percentages, and
information on general pay
administration matters and other related
information. The ‘‘2010 Salary Tables’’
posted on OPM’s Web site at: https://
www.opm.gov/oca/10tables/index.asp
are the official rates of pay for affected
employees and are hereby incorporated
as part of this notice.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–1714 Filed 1–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2010–20; Order No. 397]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service request to
add GEPS 2 (CP2009–50) to the
Competitive Product List. The Postal
Service has also filed a related contract.
This notice addresses procedural steps
associated with these filings.
DATES: Comments are due: February 1,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot
submit their views electronically should
contact the person identified in ‘‘FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT’’
by telephone for advice on alternatives
to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 or
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On January 21, 2010, the Postal
Service filed a notice announcing that it
has entered into an additional Global
Expedited Package Services 2 (GEPS 2)
contract.1
GEPS 2 provides volume-based
incentives for mailers that send large
volumes of Express Mail International
(EMI) and/or Priority Mail International
1 Notice of United States Postal Service Filing of
Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited Package
Services 2 Negotiated Service Agreement and
Application for Non-Public Treatment of Materials
Filed Under Seal, January 21, 2010 (Notice).
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4593
(PMI). The Postal Service believes the
instant contract is functionally
equivalent to the previously submitted
GEPS 2 contracts and is supported by
the Governors’ Decision filed in Docket
No. CP2008–4.2 Id. at 1.
The instant contract. The Postal
Service filed the instant contract
pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition,
the Postal Service contends that the
contract is in accordance with Order No.
290.3 The term of the instant contract is
1 year from the date the Postal Service
notifies the customer that all necessary
regulatory approvals have been
received.4 Notice at 2–3.
In support of its Notice, the Postal
Service filed four attachments as
follows:
1. Attachment 1—an application for
non-public treatment of materials to
maintain the contract and supporting
documents under seal;
2. Attachment 2—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7 which
establishes prices and classifications for
GEPS contracts, a description of
applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for
prices, an analysis and certification of
the formulas and certification of the
Governors’ vote;
3. Attachment 3—a redacted copy of
the contract, applicable annexes, and a
provision to modify the mailer’s tender
requirements; and
4. Attachment 4—a certified statement
required by 39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2).
Functional equivalency. The Postal
Service asserts that the instant contract
is functionally equivalent to the contract
in Docket No. CP2009–50 and prior
GEPS 2 contracts. Id. at 3–4. It also
contends that the instant contract meets
the requirements of Governors’ Decision
No. 08–7 for rates for GEPS contracts.
Id. at 3. The Postal Service indicates
that the instant contract differs from the
contract in Docket No. CP2009–50 in
two ways, namely, (a) customer specific
information, e.g., the customer’s name,
address, representative, signatory and
provisions clarifying tender locations,
minimum revenue and/or volume
commitment; and (b) revisions intended
to be included in all subsequent
2 See Docket No. CP2008–4, Notice of United
States Postal Service of Governors’ Decision
Establishing Prices and Classifications for Global
Expedited Package Services Contracts, May 20,
2008.
3 See Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting
Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package
Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August
28, 2009 (Order No. 290).
4 The Postal Service states its intent is to begin
this contract on February 8, 2010, at the expiration
of the customer’s current contract. The contract’s
terms provide that the Postal Service will give
notice to the mailer of the effective date within 30
days of regulatory approval.
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
4594
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2010 / Notices
agreements. Id. at 3–4. The latter
revisions address, for example, the
treatment of confidential information,
reference updates and the availability of
pickup service. The Postal Service also
notes other minor changes which
modify or delete certain provisions. Id.
The Postal Service contends that the
instant contract satisfies the pricing
formula and classification system
established in Governors’ Decision No.
08–7. Id. at 2–3. It asserts that the
instant contract and all GEPS 2
contracts have similar cost and market
characteristics and is functionally
equivalent in all relevant aspects. Id. at
3. The Postal Service concludes that this
contract is in compliance with 39 U.S.C.
3633, and requests that this contract be
included within the GEPS 2 product. Id.
at 6.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2010–20 for consideration of
matters related to the contract identified
in the Postal Service’s Notice.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s contract is consistent with the
policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642
and 39 CFR part 3015. Comments are
due no later than February 1, 2010. The
public portions of these filings can be
accessed via the Commission’s Web site
(https://www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L.
Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in this proceeding.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2010–20 for consideration of the
issues raised in this docket.
2. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
February 1, 2010.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L.
Harrington is appointed to serve as
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–1752 Filed 1–27–10; 8:45 am]
POSTAL SERVICE
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Board of Governors; Sunshine Act
Meeting
Proposed Data Collection(s) Available
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, February 9,
2010, at 8:30 a.m.; 1:30 p.m. and 3:15
p.m.
PLACE: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal
Service Headquarters, 475 L’Enfant
Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin
Room.
STATUS: February 9 at 8:30 a.m.—
Closed; 1:30 p.m.—Open; and 3:15
p.m.—Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Tuesday, February 9 at 8:30 a.m.
(Closed)
1. Strategic Issues.
2. Pricing.
3. Financial Matters.
4. Personnel Matters and
Compensation Issues.
5. Governors’ Executive Session—
Discussion of prior agenda items and
Board Governance.
Tuesday, February 9 at 1:30 p.m.
(Open)
1. Minutes of the Previous Meetings,
November 12–13, December 8, 2009;
and January 12, 2010.
2. Remarks of the Chairman of the
Board.
3. Remarks of the Postmaster General
and CEO.
4. Amendments to Board Bylaws.
5. Appointment of Committee
Members and Committee Reports.
6. Quarterly Report on Financial
Performance.
7. Inspector General Report on USPS
Share of CSRS Pension Responsibility.
8. Quarterly Report on Service
Performance.
9. Tentative Agenda for the March 22–
24, 2010, meeting in Washington, DC.
Tuesday, February 9 at 3:15 p.m.
(Closed)
1. Continuation of closed session
agenda.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the Board,
U.S. Postal Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza,
SW., Washington, DC 20260–1000.
Telephone (202) 268–4800.
Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–1858 Filed 1–26–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:16 Jan 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirement of Section 3506 (c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
which provides opportunity for public
comment on new or revised data
collections, the Railroad Retirement
Board (RRB) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed data collections.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed information collections are
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB’s
estimate of the burden for the collection
of the information; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden related to
the collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
1. Title and Purpose of Information
Collection
Application for Employee Annuity
Under the Railroad Retirement Act;
OMB 3220–0002. Section 2 of the
Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) provides
for payments of age and service,
disability, and supplemental annuities
to qualified employees. An annuity
cannot be paid until the employee stops
working for a railroad employer. In
addition, the age and service employee
must relinquish any rights held to such
jobs. A disabled employee does not
need to relinquish employee rights until
attaining Full Retirement Age, or if
earlier, their spouse files for a spouse
annuity. Benefits become payable after
the employee meets certain other
requirements, which depend on the type
of annuity payable. The requirements
for obtaining the annuities are
prescribed in 20 CFR 216, and 220.
The RRB currently uses the electronic
AA–1cert, Application Summary and
Certification process and the following
forms to collect the information needed
for determining entitlement to and the
amount of, an employee retirement
annuity: Form AA–1, Application for
Employee Annuity Under the Railroad
Retirement Act, Form AA–1d,
Application for Determination of
Employee Disability, and Form G–204,
Verification of Workers Compensation/
Public Disability Benefit Information.
The AA–1cert process obtains
information from an applicant for either
an age and service, or disability annuity
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 18 (Thursday, January 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4593-4594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1752]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2010-20; Order No. 397]
New Postal Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service
request to add GEPS 2 (CP2009-50) to the Competitive Product List. The
Postal Service has also filed a related contract. This notice addresses
procedural steps associated with these filings.
DATES: Comments are due: February 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot submit their
views electronically should contact the person identified in ``FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT'' by telephone for advice on alternatives
to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202-789-6820 or stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On January 21, 2010, the Postal Service filed a notice announcing
that it has entered into an additional Global Expedited Package
Services 2 (GEPS 2) contract.\1\
GEPS 2 provides volume-based incentives for mailers that send large
volumes of Express Mail International (EMI) and/or Priority Mail
International (PMI). The Postal Service believes the instant contract
is functionally equivalent to the previously submitted GEPS 2 contracts
and is supported by the Governors' Decision filed in Docket No. CP2008-
4.\2\ Id. at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Notice of United States Postal Service Filing of
Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited Package Services 2
Negotiated Service Agreement and Application for Non-Public
Treatment of Materials Filed Under Seal, January 21, 2010 (Notice).
\2\ See Docket No. CP2008-4, Notice of United States Postal
Service of Governors' Decision Establishing Prices and
Classifications for Global Expedited Package Services Contracts, May
20, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The instant contract. The Postal Service filed the instant contract
pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, the Postal Service contends
that the contract is in accordance with Order No. 290.\3\ The term of
the instant contract is 1 year from the date the Postal Service
notifies the customer that all necessary regulatory approvals have been
received.\4\ Notice at 2-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Docket No. CP2009-50, Order Granting Clarification and
Adding Global Expedited Package Services 2 to the Competitive
Product List, August 28, 2009 (Order No. 290).
\4\ The Postal Service states its intent is to begin this
contract on February 8, 2010, at the expiration of the customer's
current contract. The contract's terms provide that the Postal
Service will give notice to the mailer of the effective date within
30 days of regulatory approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In support of its Notice, the Postal Service filed four attachments
as follows:
1. Attachment 1--an application for non-public treatment of
materials to maintain the contract and supporting documents under seal;
2. Attachment 2--a redacted copy of Governors' Decision No. 08-7
which establishes prices and classifications for GEPS contracts, a
description of applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for prices, an
analysis and certification of the formulas and certification of the
Governors' vote;
3. Attachment 3--a redacted copy of the contract, applicable
annexes, and a provision to modify the mailer's tender requirements;
and
4. Attachment 4--a certified statement required by 39 CFR
3015.5(c)(2).
Functional equivalency. The Postal Service asserts that the instant
contract is functionally equivalent to the contract in Docket No.
CP2009-50 and prior GEPS 2 contracts. Id. at 3-4. It also contends that
the instant contract meets the requirements of Governors' Decision No.
08-7 for rates for GEPS contracts. Id. at 3. The Postal Service
indicates that the instant contract differs from the contract in Docket
No. CP2009-50 in two ways, namely, (a) customer specific information,
e.g., the customer's name, address, representative, signatory and
provisions clarifying tender locations, minimum revenue and/or volume
commitment; and (b) revisions intended to be included in all subsequent
[[Page 4594]]
agreements. Id. at 3-4. The latter revisions address, for example, the
treatment of confidential information, reference updates and the
availability of pickup service. The Postal Service also notes other
minor changes which modify or delete certain provisions. Id.
The Postal Service contends that the instant contract satisfies the
pricing formula and classification system established in Governors'
Decision No. 08-7. Id. at 2-3. It asserts that the instant contract and
all GEPS 2 contracts have similar cost and market characteristics and
is functionally equivalent in all relevant aspects. Id. at 3. The
Postal Service concludes that this contract is in compliance with 39
U.S.C. 3633, and requests that this contract be included within the
GEPS 2 product. Id. at 6.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2010-20 for consideration
of matters related to the contract identified in the Postal Service's
Notice.
Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal
Service's contract is consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632,
3633, or 3642 and 39 CFR part 3015. Comments are due no later than
February 1, 2010. The public portions of these filings can be accessed
via the Commission's Web site (https://www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in this proceeding.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2010-20 for
consideration of the issues raised in this docket.
2. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no
later than February 1, 2010.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to
serve as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent
the interests of the general public in this proceeding.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-1752 Filed 1-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-S