Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Request for Extension of Currently Approved Information Collection, 4615-4617 [2010-1698]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
5. Cost estimate. Applicants should
provide a detailed quantification of
eligible project costs by activity, an
identification of all funding sources that
will supplement the grant and be
necessary to fully fund the project, and
the anticipated dates on which the
additional funds are to be made
available. Public and private sources of
funds (non-federal commitment) will be
considered by FHWA as an in-kind
match contributing to the project. State
matching funds will be required for
projects eligible under 120 U.S.C. (b).
6. Timeline. Applicants should also
submit a timeline that includes work to
be completed and anticipated funding
cycles. Gantt charts are preferred.
7. Environmental process. Applicants
should show the timeline for complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), if applicable.
8. Project map. Applicants should
include a project map consisting of
schematic illustrations depicting the
project and connecting transportation
infrastructure.
9. Proposals should not exceed 20
pages in length.
Burden Hours for Information
Collection
Frequency: Annual.
Respondents: The 50 State DOTs and
Puerto Rico and the District of
Columbia.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: Burden hours estimates and
discussions are provided for each item
presented and required within the
application submittal process.
• Project Description (16 hours)—The
project description will be submitted
through the submitting State agency, in
conjunction with local governments,
MPOs, and other potential partners.
• Project Rationale (8 hours)—Project
rationale should include an analysis and
demonstration of how the proposed
project will positively effect truck
parking, safety, traffic congestion, or air
quality in the identified corridor.
• Scope of Work (6 hours)—A
complete listing of activities to be
funded through the grant; including
technology development, information
processing, information integration
activities, developmental phase
activities (planning, feasibility analysis,
environmental review, engineering or
design work, and other activities),
construction, reconstruction, acquisition
of real property (including land related
to the project and improvements to
land), environmental mitigation,
construction contingencies, acquisition
of equipment, operational
improvements, and a 3 year
performance measurement plan that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:16 Jan 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
continues beyond the demonstration
period of the project.
• Stakeholder Identification (1
hour)—Evidence of prior consultation
and/or partnership with affected MPOs,
local governments, community groups,
private providers of commercial motor
vehicle parking, and motorist and
trucking organizations. A listing of all
public and private partners, and the role
each will play in the execution of the
project should also be included.
• Cost estimate (4 hours)—A detailed
quantification of eligible project costs by
activity, and an identification of all
funding sources that will supplement
the grant and be necessary to fully fund
the project, and the anticipated dates on
which the additional funds are to be
made available. Public and private
sources of funds (non-federal
commitment) will be considered. State
matching funds will be required for
projects eligible under 120 U.S.C. (b).
• Project Timeline (1 hour 30
minutes)—That includes work to be
completed and anticipated funding
cycles. Gantt charts preferred.
• Environmental process (2 hours)—
Applicant should show the timeline for
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), if
applicable.
• Project Map (1 hour)—Consisting of
schematic illustrations depicting the
project and connecting transportation
infrastructure.
• Contact information for the State
DOT, Local Agency or MPO (if
applicable), FHWA Division Office (5
minutes)—This requires providing a list
of contacts and involves a nominal
amount of time.
The total amount of time estimated to
complete the application is 39 hours
and 35 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1187 hours and 30 minutes. It is
estimated 30 applications will be
processed annually.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burden could be
minimized, including the use of
electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
The agency will summarize and/or
include your comments in the request
for OMB’s clearance of this information
collection.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4615
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: January 20, 2010.
Juli Huynh,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis
Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–1697 Filed 1–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA 2010–0005]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Notice of Request for
Extension of Currently Approved
Information Collection
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The FHWA invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB’s) approval for a new information
collection, which is summarized below
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We
published a Federal Register Notice
with a 60-day public comment period
on this information collection on
November 5, 2009. We are required to
publish this notice in the Federal
Register by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by
March 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID Number
FHWA–2010–0005, by any of the
following methods:
Web Site: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions concerning the NHCBP
program, please contact Mr. Everett
Mattias, Office of Bridge Technology,
HIBT–30, at (202) 366–6712, FAX (202)
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
4616
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
366–3077, or e-mail
everett.mattias@dot.gov. For legal
questions, please contact Mr. Robert
Black, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202)
366–1359, robert.black@.dot.gov;
Federal Highway Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45
a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: National Historic Covered
Bridge Preservation Program.
OMB Control Number: 2125–0609.
Frequency: Annual.
Respondents: The 50 State DOTs,
Puerto Rico and the District of
Columbia.
Background
Covered bridges are unique structures
embodying character, functionality and
historical prominence. The National
Historic Covered Bridge Preservation
Program has been established to find
comprehensive and proven means of
maintaining the ability of these vestiges
of our bridge-building heritage to
continue to serve current and future
generations. The program was originally
established under section 1224 of TEA–
21 and continued under Section 1804 of
SAFETEA–LU. The legislation
authorizes $10 million annually to be
appropriated for each fiscal year
between FY 2006 and FY 2009. The
program has been authorized for
continuation under the current
continuing resolution. The program is
established to provide grants to States
for rehabilitation, repair and
preservation of historic covered bridges
and to enable the Secretary of
Transportation to perform research and
initiate education programs on historic
covered bridges.
Projects eligible for grants include
rehabilitation and repair together with
preservation through: installation of fire
protection systems, including a
fireproofing or fire detection system and
sprinklers, installation of a system to
prevent vandalism and arson, or
relocation of a bridge to a preservation
site. The statute requires that, to the
maximum extent practicable, grant
projects are carried out in the most
historically appropriate manner,
preserve the existing structure of the
historic covered bridge, and provide for
the replacement of wooden components
with wooden components, unless the
use of wood is impracticable for safety
reasons.
Research and education activities
include the collection and
dissemination of information on historic
covered bridges; conducting educational
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:16 Jan 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
programs relating to the history and
construction techniques of historic
covered bridges; conducting research on
the history of historic covered bridges;
and conducting research on, and study
techniques for, protecting historic
covered bridges from rot, fire, natural
disasters, or weight-related damage.
Guidelines and Administration
To administer this program, the
FHWA will collect information
necessary to evaluate and rank projects.
The information collection was
developed considering public input 1
and is intended to only address the
project funding allotted through the
program. Research funding will be
administered separately through the
FHWA Office of Infrastructure Research
and Development (R&D) at the Turner
Fairbank Highway Research Center, who
will also administer the research and
education activities. The FHWA Office
of Bridge Technology will administer
the grant program to assist the States in
their efforts to rehabilitate, repair or
preserve the Nation’s historic covered
bridges, which are listed or eligible for
listing on the National Register of
Historic Places. The FHWA will award
grants based on applications received
and funds available through
accompanying appropriations
legislation.
Information Proposed for Collection
Information recommended under
TEA–21 and proposed for the current
program includes the following:
• State’s Priority Ranking;
• National Bridge Inventory (NBI)
Structure Number;
• Bridge Name;
• Description of Location;
• Congressional District and
Representative;
• Year Built;
• Whether the structure is on or
eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places and
description of the qualities that qualify
the bridge for the National Register;
• Structure description (e.g., number
of spans, length, width, design type,
description of decking, beams/stringers,
sides and roof, wood species, wood
preservation system in use, builder,
traffic carried, etc.);
• General plan and elevation;
• Description of previous repair work
(description, year, etc.);
• Description of proposed work
including wood preservative system,
fire protection, vandalism and arson
prevention systems to be used;
1 Implementation Guidance for the National
Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program,
August 23, 2000; 65 FR 51401.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Indication of whether the State has
a historic bridge inventory/management
plan accepted by the State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO). A
programmatic agreement for historic
bridges with the SHPO, FHWA and the
Advisory Counsel on Historic
Preservation (ACHP) may substitute;
• Description of whether the SHPO
has reviewed and certified this project
is warranted in accordance with the
SHPO’s statewide historic preservation
plan; how it benefits statewide
preservation efforts; how it enhances
cultural tourism or enhances the
history/economic development of the
community; and other benefits upon
successful completion of this project;
• Amount of State or local
government matching funds or other
resources (donated materials or labor
may qualify);
• A statement addressing when the
project is complete, and if the bridge
will meet the current State or American
Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
standards for the roadway classification
that it carries;
• Plan for documentation of the
bridge and the work performed;
• Scheduled start and completion
date for the project (month and year);
and
• Contact information for the State
DOT, Local Agency (if applicable),
FHWA Division Office, and SHPO.
As indicated above, the FHWA has
developed a template for the
application. The application may be
made based on this template provided
by the FHWA including this
information. This template is available
through the FHWA Division Offices and
through the FHWA Office of Bridge
Technology and is available at the
following URL: https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/
022803a.htm#application. The template
is not required but rather is provided for
convenience of the applicants.
Burden Hours for Information
Collection
Burden hour estimates and
discussions are provided for each item
presented and required within the
application submittal process.
• State’s Priority Ranking: 30
minutes.
Æ The priority ranking will be
performed by the submitting agency.
Given that a small number of
applications will be submitted by an
individual State, the prioritization
process will be limited and 30 minutes
is conservatively assumed to include
any potential discussion.
• NBI Structure Number: 5 minutes.
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2010 / Notices
Æ Projects submitted must be legally
defined as a ‘‘bridge’’ and must be
located on a public road. With this
constraint, each structure will already
have an NBI Structure Number assigned.
• Bridge Name: 5 minutes.
Æ A description of the bridge may be
included in the NBI database; however,
this may or may not be the commonly
referenced name used locally. A burden
of 5 minutes is assumed to permit the
applicant to review the NBI record and
any additional documentation to isolate
the common bridge name.
• Description of Location: 10
minutes.
Æ The location is already included in
the NBI database. A burden of 10
minutes is provided assuming that the
applicant will elaborate on the location
information.
• Congressional District and
Representative: 5 minutes.
Æ The location of the bridge will be
known from the information in the NBI
database. A 5-minute burden is
specified assuming that the applicant
will have to cross reference the location
with Congressional district maps. This
time would be negligible if the State has
employed a GIS system including the
infrastructure information and the
political boundaries.
• Year Built: 5 minutes.
Æ The year built is already recorded
in the National Bridge Inventory
• Whether the structure is on or
eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places and
description of the qualities that qualify
the bridge for the National Register: 15
minutes.
Æ The NBI record indicated whether
the structure is located on or eligible for
the National Register of Historic Places.
The 15-minute burden is assumed to
allow the applicant to describe the
qualities that qualify the bridge for the
National Register.
• Structure description (e.g., number
of spans, length, width, design type,
description of decking, beams/stringers,
sides and roof, wood species, wood
preservation system in use, builder,
traffic carried, etc.): 15 minutes.
Æ Most of this information will be
included within the NBI database or on
the inspection reports. 15 minutes is
assumed for the applicant to synthesize
information.
• General plan and elevation: 5
minutes.
Æ This information is available for
structures that have been placed on the
National Register of Historic Places or
for those, which are eligible and have
applications complete. This information
is also available for projects that have
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:16 Jan 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
completed conceptual and preliminary
engineering and design.
• Description of previous repair work
(description, year, etc.): 15 minutes.
Æ This information is available from
bridge inspection reports and bridge
files located within the State
Transportation Agency. Time estimated
is intended for synthesis of information
from other sources.
• Description of proposed work
including wood preservative system,
fire protection, vandalism and arson
prevention systems to be used: 15
minutes.
Æ This information will be
established by the need when identified
and the details will be identified
through the conceptual and preliminary
engineering process, which is done
independently. A 15-minute burden is
assumed to synthesize the existing
information.
• Indication of whether the State has
a historic bridge inventory/management
plan accepted by the SHPO. A
programmatic agreement for historic
bridges with the SHPO, FHWA and the
ACHP may substitute: 5 minutes.
Æ This item is readily obtained
through contact with the SHPO.
• Description of whether the SHPO
has reviewed and certified this project
is warranted in accordance with the
SHPO’s statewide historic preservation
plan; how it benefits statewide
preservation efforts; how it enhances
cultural tourism or enhances the
history/economic development of the
community; and other benefits upon
successful completion of this project: 45
minutes.
Æ This information is readily
obtained through contact with the
SHPO. A total of 45 minutes includes
time for the State Historic Preservation
Officer to review the project, in relation
to the statewide preservation efforts, to
articulate the benefits, and to document
the findings.
• Amount of State or local
government matching funds or other
resources (donated materials or labor
may qualify): 5 minutes.
Æ A nominal amount of time is
required to document the matching
funds and amounts.
• When the project is complete, will
the bridge meet the current State or
AASHTO standards for the roadway
classification that it carries: 5 minutes.
Æ A nominal amount of time is
required to ascertain and identify
whether the bridge will meet the
standards for the roadway classification
as any exception to the standard will be
identified through the preliminary
engineering process and already
documented.
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
4617
• Plan for documentation of the
bridge and the work performed: 15
minutes.
Æ A plan for documentation is
encouraged. Typically, each State
Transportation Agency will already
have a process in place to document
work performed. Applicants are
encouraged to identify any additional
requirements warranted for these
historical structures and to articulate the
overall plan within the application.
• Scheduled start and completion
date for the project (month and year): 5
minutes
Æ This will be determined through
other processes that are performed
independent of this program, including
preliminary engineering and the STIP
process. The available information must
be synthesized on the application,
which takes a nominal amount of time.
• Contact information for the State
DOT, Local Agency (if applicable),
FHWA Division Office, and SHPO: 5
minutes.
Æ This requires providing a list of
contacts and involves a nominal amount
of time.
Respondents: 51 State Transportation
Departments, including the District of
Columbia.
Frequency: Annually.
Individual Respondent Burden: The
total amount of time estimated to
complete the application is 31⁄2 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 105 hours (FHWA estimates
receiving 30 reports from the State
Transportation Departments).
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of estimated burdens;
(3) ways for the FHWA to enhance the
quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
collected information; and (4) ways that
burdens could be minimized, including
use of electronic technology, without
reducing the quality of the collected
information. The agency will summarize
and/or include your comments in the
request for OMB’s clearance of this
information collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: January 20, 2010.
Juli Huynh,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis
Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–1698 Filed 1–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 18 (Thursday, January 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4615-4617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1698]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA 2010-0005]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Request for
Extension of Currently Approved Information Collection
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA invites public comments about our intention to
request the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB's) approval for a
new information collection, which is summarized below under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We published a Federal Register Notice with
a 60-day public comment period on this information collection on
November 5, 2009. We are required to publish this notice in the Federal
Register by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by March 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number
FHWA-2010-0005, by any of the following methods:
Web Site: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions concerning the NHCBP
program, please contact Mr. Everett Mattias, Office of Bridge
Technology, HIBT-30, at (202) 366-6712, FAX (202)
[[Page 4616]]
366-3077, or e-mail everett.mattias@dot.gov. For legal questions,
please contact Mr. Robert Black, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202)
366-1359, robert.black@.dot.gov; Federal Highway Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: National Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program.
OMB Control Number: 2125-0609.
Frequency: Annual.
Respondents: The 50 State DOTs, Puerto Rico and the District of
Columbia.
Background
Covered bridges are unique structures embodying character,
functionality and historical prominence. The National Historic Covered
Bridge Preservation Program has been established to find comprehensive
and proven means of maintaining the ability of these vestiges of our
bridge-building heritage to continue to serve current and future
generations. The program was originally established under section 1224
of TEA-21 and continued under Section 1804 of SAFETEA-LU. The
legislation authorizes $10 million annually to be appropriated for each
fiscal year between FY 2006 and FY 2009. The program has been
authorized for continuation under the current continuing resolution.
The program is established to provide grants to States for
rehabilitation, repair and preservation of historic covered bridges and
to enable the Secretary of Transportation to perform research and
initiate education programs on historic covered bridges.
Projects eligible for grants include rehabilitation and repair
together with preservation through: installation of fire protection
systems, including a fireproofing or fire detection system and
sprinklers, installation of a system to prevent vandalism and arson, or
relocation of a bridge to a preservation site. The statute requires
that, to the maximum extent practicable, grant projects are carried out
in the most historically appropriate manner, preserve the existing
structure of the historic covered bridge, and provide for the
replacement of wooden components with wooden components, unless the use
of wood is impracticable for safety reasons.
Research and education activities include the collection and
dissemination of information on historic covered bridges; conducting
educational programs relating to the history and construction
techniques of historic covered bridges; conducting research on the
history of historic covered bridges; and conducting research on, and
study techniques for, protecting historic covered bridges from rot,
fire, natural disasters, or weight-related damage.
Guidelines and Administration
To administer this program, the FHWA will collect information
necessary to evaluate and rank projects. The information collection was
developed considering public input \1\ and is intended to only address
the project funding allotted through the program. Research funding will
be administered separately through the FHWA Office of Infrastructure
Research and Development (R&D) at the Turner Fairbank Highway Research
Center, who will also administer the research and education activities.
The FHWA Office of Bridge Technology will administer the grant program
to assist the States in their efforts to rehabilitate, repair or
preserve the Nation's historic covered bridges, which are listed or
eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The
FHWA will award grants based on applications received and funds
available through accompanying appropriations legislation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Implementation Guidance for the National Historic Covered
Bridge Preservation Program, August 23, 2000; 65 FR 51401.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information Proposed for Collection
Information recommended under TEA-21 and proposed for the current
program includes the following:
State's Priority Ranking;
National Bridge Inventory (NBI) Structure Number;
Bridge Name;
Description of Location;
Congressional District and Representative;
Year Built;
Whether the structure is on or eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places and description of the qualities
that qualify the bridge for the National Register;
Structure description (e.g., number of spans, length,
width, design type, description of decking, beams/stringers, sides and
roof, wood species, wood preservation system in use, builder, traffic
carried, etc.);
General plan and elevation;
Description of previous repair work (description, year,
etc.);
Description of proposed work including wood preservative
system, fire protection, vandalism and arson prevention systems to be
used;
Indication of whether the State has a historic bridge
inventory/management plan accepted by the State Historic Preservation
Officer (SHPO). A programmatic agreement for historic bridges with the
SHPO, FHWA and the Advisory Counsel on Historic Preservation (ACHP) may
substitute;
Description of whether the SHPO has reviewed and certified
this project is warranted in accordance with the SHPO's statewide
historic preservation plan; how it benefits statewide preservation
efforts; how it enhances cultural tourism or enhances the history/
economic development of the community; and other benefits upon
successful completion of this project;
Amount of State or local government matching funds or
other resources (donated materials or labor may qualify);
A statement addressing when the project is complete, and
if the bridge will meet the current State or American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards for the
roadway classification that it carries;
Plan for documentation of the bridge and the work
performed;
Scheduled start and completion date for the project (month
and year); and
Contact information for the State DOT, Local Agency (if
applicable), FHWA Division Office, and SHPO.
As indicated above, the FHWA has developed a template for the
application. The application may be made based on this template
provided by the FHWA including this information. This template is
available through the FHWA Division Offices and through the FHWA Office
of Bridge Technology and is available at the following URL: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/022803a.htm#application. The template is not
required but rather is provided for convenience of the applicants.
Burden Hours for Information Collection
Burden hour estimates and discussions are provided for each item
presented and required within the application submittal process.
State's Priority Ranking: 30 minutes.
[cir] The priority ranking will be performed by the submitting
agency. Given that a small number of applications will be submitted by
an individual State, the prioritization process will be limited and 30
minutes is conservatively assumed to include any potential discussion.
NBI Structure Number: 5 minutes.
[[Page 4617]]
[cir] Projects submitted must be legally defined as a ``bridge''
and must be located on a public road. With this constraint, each
structure will already have an NBI Structure Number assigned.
Bridge Name: 5 minutes.
[cir] A description of the bridge may be included in the NBI
database; however, this may or may not be the commonly referenced name
used locally. A burden of 5 minutes is assumed to permit the applicant
to review the NBI record and any additional documentation to isolate
the common bridge name.
Description of Location: 10 minutes.
[cir] The location is already included in the NBI database. A
burden of 10 minutes is provided assuming that the applicant will
elaborate on the location information.
Congressional District and Representative: 5 minutes.
[cir] The location of the bridge will be known from the information
in the NBI database. A 5-minute burden is specified assuming that the
applicant will have to cross reference the location with Congressional
district maps. This time would be negligible if the State has employed
a GIS system including the infrastructure information and the political
boundaries.
Year Built: 5 minutes.
[cir] The year built is already recorded in the National Bridge
Inventory
Whether the structure is on or eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places and description of the qualities
that qualify the bridge for the National Register: 15 minutes.
[cir] The NBI record indicated whether the structure is located on
or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The 15-minute
burden is assumed to allow the applicant to describe the qualities that
qualify the bridge for the National Register.
Structure description (e.g., number of spans, length,
width, design type, description of decking, beams/stringers, sides and
roof, wood species, wood preservation system in use, builder, traffic
carried, etc.): 15 minutes.
[cir] Most of this information will be included within the NBI
database or on the inspection reports. 15 minutes is assumed for the
applicant to synthesize information.
General plan and elevation: 5 minutes.
[cir] This information is available for structures that have been
placed on the National Register of Historic Places or for those, which
are eligible and have applications complete. This information is also
available for projects that have completed conceptual and preliminary
engineering and design.
Description of previous repair work (description, year,
etc.): 15 minutes.
[cir] This information is available from bridge inspection reports
and bridge files located within the State Transportation Agency. Time
estimated is intended for synthesis of information from other sources.
Description of proposed work including wood preservative
system, fire protection, vandalism and arson prevention systems to be
used: 15 minutes.
[cir] This information will be established by the need when
identified and the details will be identified through the conceptual
and preliminary engineering process, which is done independently. A 15-
minute burden is assumed to synthesize the existing information.
Indication of whether the State has a historic bridge
inventory/management plan accepted by the SHPO. A programmatic
agreement for historic bridges with the SHPO, FHWA and the ACHP may
substitute: 5 minutes.
[cir] This item is readily obtained through contact with the SHPO.
Description of whether the SHPO has reviewed and certified
this project is warranted in accordance with the SHPO's statewide
historic preservation plan; how it benefits statewide preservation
efforts; how it enhances cultural tourism or enhances the history/
economic development of the community; and other benefits upon
successful completion of this project: 45 minutes.
[cir] This information is readily obtained through contact with the
SHPO. A total of 45 minutes includes time for the State Historic
Preservation Officer to review the project, in relation to the
statewide preservation efforts, to articulate the benefits, and to
document the findings.
Amount of State or local government matching funds or
other resources (donated materials or labor may qualify): 5 minutes.
[cir] A nominal amount of time is required to document the matching
funds and amounts.
When the project is complete, will the bridge meet the
current State or AASHTO standards for the roadway classification that
it carries: 5 minutes.
[cir] A nominal amount of time is required to ascertain and
identify whether the bridge will meet the standards for the roadway
classification as any exception to the standard will be identified
through the preliminary engineering process and already documented.
Plan for documentation of the bridge and the work
performed: 15 minutes.
[cir] A plan for documentation is encouraged. Typically, each State
Transportation Agency will already have a process in place to document
work performed. Applicants are encouraged to identify any additional
requirements warranted for these historical structures and to
articulate the overall plan within the application.
Scheduled start and completion date for the project (month
and year): 5 minutes
[cir] This will be determined through other processes that are
performed independent of this program, including preliminary
engineering and the STIP process. The available information must be
synthesized on the application, which takes a nominal amount of time.
Contact information for the State DOT, Local Agency (if
applicable), FHWA Division Office, and SHPO: 5 minutes.
[cir] This requires providing a list of contacts and involves a
nominal amount of time.
Respondents: 51 State Transportation Departments, including the
District of Columbia.
Frequency: Annually.
Individual Respondent Burden: The total amount of time estimated to
complete the application is 3\1/2\ hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 105 hours (FHWA estimates
receiving 30 reports from the State Transportation Departments).
Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the FHWA's performance; (2) the accuracy of
estimated burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and (4) ways that
burdens could be minimized, including use of electronic technology,
without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency
will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB's
clearance of this information collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: January 20, 2010.
Juli Huynh,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-1698 Filed 1-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P