Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Model SE3160, SA315B, SA316B, SA316C, and SA319B Helicopters, 4482-4485 [2010-1157]
Download as PDF
4482
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
DVI–10000–3) and Corrosion Prevention and
Control Programme Task C53–230–02–01.
For the reason described above, this AD
requires repetitive [detailed] inspections of
the Frame 29 wing-to-fuselage attachment lug
plate joint [for discrepancies, which are
corrosion and fatigue cracking of the bolts
and fastener bores; degraded, cracked,
missing, and poor condition sealant] and
repair(s) [which include replacing bolts,
contacting BAE Systems for repair
instructions and doing the repair and reapplying sealant], as necessary.
The unsafe condition is degradation of the
structural integrity of Frame 29 and the wingto-fuselage attachment, which could result in
loss of control of the airplane.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, do a detailed inspection for
discrepancies of the frame 29 wing-tofuselage attachment lug plate joint, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–
213, dated May 21, 2008.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
(2) Repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 48 months.
(3) During any inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD, if it is not
possible to replace a removed bolt with
another bolt having the same part number as
a replacement item, before further flight,
contact BAE SYSTEMS to replace the
removed bolt with an alternative bolt and do
the approved BAE SYSTEMS repair.
(4) If during any inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD, any
discrepancy is found, before further flight,
repair in accordance with paragraph 2.C. of
the Accomplishment Instructions of BAE
SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Inspection
Service Bulletin ISB.53–213, dated May 21,
2008.
(5) Although BAE SYSTEMS (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–
213, dated May 21, 2008, specifies to submit
certain information to the manufacturer, this
AD does not include that requirement.
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
Although BAE SYSTEMS (Operations)
Limited Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–
213, dated May 21, 2008; and European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2009–
0046, dated March 2, 2009; specify to submit
certain information to the manufacturer, this
AD does not include that requirement.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:06 Jan 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Todd Thompson,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2009–0046, dated March 2, 2009;
and BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited
Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–213,
dated May 21, 2008; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use BAE SYSTEMS
(Operations) Limited Inspection Service
Bulletin ISB.53–213, dated May 21, 2008, to
do the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact BAE Systems Regional
Aircraft, 13850 McLearen Road, Herndon,
Virginia 20171; telephone 703–736–1080; email raebusiness@baesystems.com; Internet
https://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/
RegionalAircraft/index.htm.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
14, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–1283 Filed 1–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0047; Directorate
Identifier 2009–SW–28–AD; Amendment 39–
16177; AD 2010–02–07]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
France Model SE3160, SA315B,
SA316B, SA316C, and SA319B
Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes
an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for the specified Eurocopter France
(Eurocopter) model helicopters. The
existing AD requires certain inspections
of a main rotor blade (blade)
manufactured under a Parts
Manufacturer Approval under
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
SH778GL. The AD requires inspecting
each affected root end bolt (bolt) and
bolt-hole for corrosion or a crack on the
blade root end fitting (fitting) or in a
bolt-hole. For certain serial-numbered
blades, the AD also requires a one-time
pull test on each fitting and blade root
end doubler (doubler) to detect
disbonding. This AD requires certain
inspections for voids in any doubler or
fitting and for paint cracks along the
forward and aft edge of the blade fitting.
Also, this AD requires inspecting the
blade tip weight housing attachment.
This AD also requires replacing
unairworthy blades with airworthy
blades. This amendment is prompted by
reports from the STC holder of disbonds
at the fittings, doublers, and the tip
weight fitting. The actions specified by
this AD are intended to prevent blade
failure and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter.
DATES: Effective February 12, 2010.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of February
12, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Comments for inclusion in the Rules
Docket must be received on or before
March 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
AD:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this AD from Phlight of
Phancy Corp. (PPC), 791 Westport
Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177–
4511, telephone 817–491–6755, fax
817–491–6759.
Examining the Docket: You may
examine the docket that contains the
AD, any comments, and other
information on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov, or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket
Operations office (telephone (800) 647–
5527) is located in Room W12–140 on
the ground floor of the West Building at
the street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Martin R.
Crane, ASW–170, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Rotorcraft Certification Office, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137, telephone (817) 222–5170, fax
(817) 222–5783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July
16, 2003, the FAA issued an Emergency
AD 2003–15–51. That Emergency AD
was published as a final rule on August
28, 2003 (68 FR 51681). The current AD
requires certain inspections of a blade
manufactured under a PMA issued and
based on STC SH778GL. The AD
requires inspecting each bolt and bolthole for corrosion or a crack on the
fitting or in a bolt-hole on each affected
blade. For certain serial-numbered
blades, the AD also requires a one-time
pull test on each fitting and doubler to
detect disbonding. That action was
prompted by a report from the blade
manufacturer of the discovery of a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:06 Jan 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
cracked blade. In that action, we stated
that the cause of the crack remained
under investigation. That condition, if
not corrected, could result in failure of
a blade and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter.
Since issuing that AD, bond failures
continue to be found in certain blades
produced under a Parts Manufacturer
Approval based on STC SH778GL.
These bond failures occurred even after
the inspections specified by Rotor
Trends LLC Service Bulletin (SB) No.
01.03, dated July 9, 2003 (Rotor Trends
SB), and required by AD 2003–15–51.
Pflight of Phancy Corp. (PPC), the
current STC holder, has issued Service
Bulletin No. SB L3160–P–001, dated
May 20, 2009 (PPC SB), to supersede the
Rotor Trends SB. The PPC SB specifies
visual and tap inspections of the blade
root fittings and doublers. The PPC SB
also specifies replacing certain blades
that have voids or paint cracks and
inspecting the blade tip weight housing
on the outboard end of the blade.
Finally, the PPC SB specifies removing
all affected blades by May 20, 2010, or
500 hours time-in-service (TIS),
whichever occurs first. This AD does
not require replacing the blades at 500
hours TIS. However, replacing the
affected blades with airworthy blades to
which this AD does not apply would be
terminating action for the requirements
of this AD.
Since an unsafe condition has been
identified that is likely to exist or
develop on other Eurocopter model
helicopters of these same type designs,
this AD supersedes AD 2003–15–51 to
require the following:
• Within 10 hours TIS, inspect each
affected blade in the doublers for a void
and in the forward and aft edges for a
paint crack.
Æ If you do not find a void or paint
crack in the doublers or fitting, and the
only void you find is isolated in a .25
inch edge band of any doubler or a
fitting, repeat the inspection at intervals
not to exceed 30 hours TIS.
Æ If you find a void in any doubler or
either fitting not isolated in a .25 inch
band or a paint crack of any length
along the forward or aft edge of the
fitting at certain blade stations, replace
the blade with an airworthy blade before
further flight.
• Within 10 hours TIS, tap and
visually inspect each affected blade:
Æ Remove the paint, and coin tap
inspect the upper and lower surface of
the No. 2 spar to tip weight housing
bond for a bond void.
Æ Using a 10X or higher magnifying
glass, visually inspect the No. 1 spar
around through pins for hole elongation,
a crack in the spar, and pin movement
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4483
(pins should be flush with upper and
lower spar surfaces). Visually inspect
the tip weight housing outboard face for
movement relative to the spar (tip
weight housing should be flush with the
face of No. 1 and 2 spars).
Æ Measure the thickness of the upper
and lower spar by using calipers held
against the face of the No. 1 spar in
alignment with the through pins.
Æ If you find any of the following,
replace the blade with an airworthy
blade before further flight:
Æ A void between the No. 2 spar to
tip weight housing;
Æ In the No. 1 spar, either a crack, an
elongated through pin hole, movement
of a through pin, or a through pin that
is not flush with the spar surface;
Æ Movement of the tip weight
housing or a tip weight housing that is
not flush with the No. 1 or 2 spar; or
Æ An upper or lower spar measures
less than 0.045 inch.
Æ If you do not find any of these
discrepancies, repeat the inspection at
intervals not to exceed 30 hours TIS.
• Replacing an affected blade with an
airworthy blade, with a serial number
that is not included in the
‘‘Applicability’’ section of this AD,
constitutes terminating action for the
requirements of this AD.
Do the actions by following the
specified portions of the SB described
previously.
The short compliance time involved
is required because the previously
described critical unsafe condition can
adversely affect the controllability or
structural integrity of the helicopter.
Therefore, inspecting each blade within
10 hours TIS, repeating the inspection at
intervals not to exceed 30 hours TIS,
and replacing the blades as necessary
before further flight are very short
compliance times, and this AD must be
issued immediately.
Since a situation exists that requires
the immediate adoption of this
regulation, it is found that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
hereon are impracticable, and that good
cause exists for making this amendment
effective in less than 30 days.
The FAA estimates that this AD will
affect 30 helicopters. The required
actions will take about 3 work hours to
inspect a blade and 3 work hours to
replace a blade at an average labor rate
of $80 per work hour. Required parts
will cost about $50,000 per blade. There
are three blades per helicopter. Based on
these figures, we estimate the total cost
impact of the AD on U.S. operators to
be $3,588,640, assuming 71 blades are
replaced.
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
4484
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements that affect flight safety and
was not preceded by notice and an
opportunity for public comment;
however, we invite you to submit any
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under ADDRESSES.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2010–0047;
Directorate Identifier 2009–SW–28–AD’’
at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the AD. We will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend the AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this AD. Using the
search function of our docket Web site,
you can find and read the comments to
any of our dockets, including the name
of the individual who sent the
comment. You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78).
Regulatory Findings
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. For the reasons
discussed above, I certify that the
regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD. See the AD docket to examine
the economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:06 Jan 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by
removing Amendment 39–13276 (68 FR
51681, dated August 28, 2003), and by
adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD), Amendment 39–16177, to read as
follows:
■
2010–02–07 Eurocopter France:
Amendment 39–16177. Docket No.
FAA–2010–0047; Directorate Identifier
2009–SW–28–AD. Supersedes AD 2003–
15–51, Amendment 39–13276, Docket
No. 2003–SW–34–AD.
Applicability:
Eurocopter France Model SE3160, SA315B,
SA316B, SA316C, and SA319B helicopters,
with main rotor blade (blade) part number
L3160–100–01, serial number (S/N) 600
through 671 (except those identified with
both ‘‘SB L3160–P–001A’’ and ‘‘SB L3160–P–
001B’’ next to the blade data plate), produced
under a Parts Manufacturer Approval based
on Supplemental Type Certificate SH778GL,
installed, certificated in any category.
Compliance:
Required as indicated.
To prevent failure of a blade and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter,
do the following:
(a) Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS),
unless accomplished previously, tap and
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
visually inspect each blade, S/N 600 through
666, 668 through 669, and 671 (except those
identified with ‘‘SB L3160–P–001A’’ next to
the blade data plate) in the root doublers for
a void and in the forward and aft edges for
a paint crack in the areas depicted in Figure
1 of Phlight of Phancy Corp. Service Bulletin
No. SB L3160–P–001, dated May 20, 2009
(SB), and by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, Part A, paragraph 2.a. through
2.e., of the SB.
(1) If there is no void or paint crack in the
root doublers or fitting, and the only void
you find is isolated in the .25 inch edge band
of a doubler or a fitting as depicted in Figure
1 of the SB, repeat the inspection at intervals
not to exceed 30 hours TIS.
(2) If you find a void in any doubler or any
root fitting not isolated to the .25 inch band
as depicted in Figure 1 of the SB or a paint
crack of any length along the forward or aft
edge of a root fitting between Blade Stations
35.02 and 42.52, replace the blade with an
airworthy blade before further flight.
(b) Within 10 hours TIS, unless
accomplished previously, inspect each blade,
S/N 600 through 671 (except those identified
with ‘‘SB L3160–P–001B’’ next to the blade
data plate), in the areas depicted in Figures
2 and 3 and by following the
Accomplishment Instructions, Part B, of the
SB as follows:
(1) Remove the paint and coin tap inspect
the upper and lower surface of the No. 2 spar
to tip weight housing bond as depicted in
Figure 2 of the SB for a bond void. Conduct
the inspection by following the
Accomplishment Instructions, Part B,
paragraphs 2.a. through 2.e. of the SB.
(2) Using a 10X or higher magnifying glass,
visually inspect the No. 1 spar around the
through pins for hole elongation, a crack in
the spar, and pin movement (pins should be
flush with upper and lower spar surfaces).
Visually inspect the tip weight housing
outboard face for evidence of movement
relative to the spar (tip weight housing
should be flush with the face of No. 1 and
2 spars).
(3) Measure the thickness of the upper and
lower spar by using calipers held against the
face of the No. 1 spar in alignment with the
through pins as depicted in Figure 3 of the
SB.
(4) If you find any of the following, replace
the blade with an airworthy blade before
further flight:
(i) A void between the No. 2 spar and tip
weight housing;
(ii) In the No. 1 spar, either a crack, an
elongated through pinhole, movement of a
through pin, or a through pin that is not flush
with the spar surface;
(iii) Movement of the tip weight housing or
a tip weight housing that is not flush with
the No. 1 and No. 2 spar; or
(iv) An upper or lower spar with thickness
less than 0.045 inch.
(5) If you do not find any of the
discrepancies identified in paragraph (b)(4)(i)
through (b)(4)(iv) of this AD, repeat the
inspections required by paragraph (b) of this
AD at intervals not to exceed 30 hours TIS.
(c) Replacing an affected blade with an
airworthy blade with a serial number that is
not included in the ‘‘Applicability’’ section of
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
this AD constitutes terminating action for the
requirements of this AD.
(d) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Contact the Manager, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Rotorcraft Certification Office,
ATTN: DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Martin
Crane, ASW–170, Aviation Safety Engineer,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137, telephone (817) 222–5170, fax (817)
222–5783, for information about previously
approved alternative methods of compliance.
(e) Special flight permits will not be
issued.
(f) The Joint Aircraft System/Component
(JASC) Code for the subject of this AD is
Code 6210: Main rotor blades.
(g) Inspect the blades by following the
specified portions of the Phlight of Phancy
Corp. Service Bulletin SB L3160–P–001,
dated May 20, 2009. The Director of the
Federal Register approved this incorporation
by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Copies may be obtained from Phlight
of Phancy Corp., 791 Westport Parkway, Fort
Worth, Texas 76177–4511, telephone 817–
491–6755, fax 817–491–6759. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
(h) This amendment becomes effective on
February 12, 2010.
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Several cases have been reported where a
passenger door actuator detached from the
passenger door. This caused the passenger
door to drop to the platform in an
uncontrolled manner.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in injury to persons on the ground and
damage to the aircraft.
Explanation of Changes Made to This
AD
We have revised this AD to identify
the legal name of the manufacturer as
published in the most recent type
certificate data sheet for the affected
airplane models.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 8,
2010.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
March 4, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of March 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2010–1157 Filed 1–27–10; 8:45 am]
Discussion
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on September 28, 2009 (74 FR
49349). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0793; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–051–AD; Amendment
39–16183; AD 2010–02–12]
RIN 2120–AA64
rmajette on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker
Services B.V. Model F.28 Mark 0070
and 0100 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:06 Jan 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
4485
Several cases have been reported where a
passenger door actuator detached from the
passenger door. This caused the passenger
door to drop to the platform in an
uncontrolled manner.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in injury to persons on the ground and
damage to the aircraft.
To address this problem, Fokker Services
has developed an improved actuator to
ensure the proper functioning of the door
opening mechanism.
For the reason described above, this AD
requires the replacement of existing airstair
door actuators with improved actuators.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the
AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 2
products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 12 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost about $4,933
per product. Where the service
information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we
have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be
$11,786, or $5,893 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 18 (Thursday, January 28, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4482-4485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1157]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0047; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-28-AD;
Amendment 39-16177; AD 2010-02-07]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Model SE3160, SA315B,
SA316B, SA316C, and SA319B Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) for the specified Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) model
helicopters. The existing AD requires certain inspections of a main
rotor blade (blade) manufactured under a Parts Manufacturer Approval
under Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SH778GL. The AD requires
inspecting each affected root end bolt (bolt) and bolt-hole for
corrosion or a crack on the blade root end fitting (fitting) or in a
bolt-hole. For certain serial-numbered blades, the AD also requires a
one-time pull test on each fitting and blade root end doubler (doubler)
to detect disbonding. This AD requires certain inspections for voids in
any doubler or fitting and for paint cracks along the forward and aft
edge of the blade fitting. Also, this AD requires inspecting the blade
tip weight housing attachment. This AD also requires replacing
unairworthy blades with airworthy blades. This amendment is prompted by
reports from the STC holder of disbonds at the fittings, doublers, and
the tip weight fitting. The actions specified by this AD are intended
to prevent blade failure and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
DATES: Effective February 12, 2010.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of February 12, 2010.
[[Page 4483]]
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before March 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this AD:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information identified in this AD from
Phlight of Phancy Corp. (PPC), 791 Westport Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas
76177-4511, telephone 817-491-6755, fax 817-491-6759.
Examining the Docket: You may examine the docket that contains the
AD, any comments, and other information on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov, or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
located in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the West Building at the
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Martin R.
Crane, ASW-170, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Rotorcraft Certification Office, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137, telephone (817) 222-5170, fax (817) 222-5783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 16, 2003, the FAA issued an
Emergency AD 2003-15-51. That Emergency AD was published as a final
rule on August 28, 2003 (68 FR 51681). The current AD requires certain
inspections of a blade manufactured under a PMA issued and based on STC
SH778GL. The AD requires inspecting each bolt and bolt-hole for
corrosion or a crack on the fitting or in a bolt-hole on each affected
blade. For certain serial-numbered blades, the AD also requires a one-
time pull test on each fitting and doubler to detect disbonding. That
action was prompted by a report from the blade manufacturer of the
discovery of a cracked blade. In that action, we stated that the cause
of the crack remained under investigation. That condition, if not
corrected, could result in failure of a blade and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter.
Since issuing that AD, bond failures continue to be found in
certain blades produced under a Parts Manufacturer Approval based on
STC SH778GL. These bond failures occurred even after the inspections
specified by Rotor Trends LLC Service Bulletin (SB) No. 01.03, dated
July 9, 2003 (Rotor Trends SB), and required by AD 2003-15-51. Pflight
of Phancy Corp. (PPC), the current STC holder, has issued Service
Bulletin No. SB L3160-P-001, dated May 20, 2009 (PPC SB), to supersede
the Rotor Trends SB. The PPC SB specifies visual and tap inspections of
the blade root fittings and doublers. The PPC SB also specifies
replacing certain blades that have voids or paint cracks and inspecting
the blade tip weight housing on the outboard end of the blade. Finally,
the PPC SB specifies removing all affected blades by May 20, 2010, or
500 hours time-in-service (TIS), whichever occurs first. This AD does
not require replacing the blades at 500 hours TIS. However, replacing
the affected blades with airworthy blades to which this AD does not
apply would be terminating action for the requirements of this AD.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other Eurocopter model helicopters of these same
type designs, this AD supersedes AD 2003-15-51 to require the
following:
Within 10 hours TIS, inspect each affected blade in the
doublers for a void and in the forward and aft edges for a paint crack.
[cir] If you do not find a void or paint crack in the doublers or
fitting, and the only void you find is isolated in a .25 inch edge band
of any doubler or a fitting, repeat the inspection at intervals not to
exceed 30 hours TIS.
[cir] If you find a void in any doubler or either fitting not
isolated in a .25 inch band or a paint crack of any length along the
forward or aft edge of the fitting at certain blade stations, replace
the blade with an airworthy blade before further flight.
Within 10 hours TIS, tap and visually inspect each
affected blade:
[cir] Remove the paint, and coin tap inspect the upper and lower
surface of the No. 2 spar to tip weight housing bond for a bond void.
[cir] Using a 10X or higher magnifying glass, visually inspect the
No. 1 spar around through pins for hole elongation, a crack in the
spar, and pin movement (pins should be flush with upper and lower spar
surfaces). Visually inspect the tip weight housing outboard face for
movement relative to the spar (tip weight housing should be flush with
the face of No. 1 and 2 spars).
[cir] Measure the thickness of the upper and lower spar by using
calipers held against the face of the No. 1 spar in alignment with the
through pins.
[cir] If you find any of the following, replace the blade with an
airworthy blade before further flight:
[cir] A void between the No. 2 spar to tip weight housing;
[cir] In the No. 1 spar, either a crack, an elongated through pin
hole, movement of a through pin, or a through pin that is not flush
with the spar surface;
[cir] Movement of the tip weight housing or a tip weight housing
that is not flush with the No. 1 or 2 spar; or
[cir] An upper or lower spar measures less than 0.045 inch.
[cir] If you do not find any of these discrepancies, repeat the
inspection at intervals not to exceed 30 hours TIS.
Replacing an affected blade with an airworthy blade, with
a serial number that is not included in the ``Applicability'' section
of this AD, constitutes terminating action for the requirements of this
AD.
Do the actions by following the specified portions of the SB
described previously.
The short compliance time involved is required because the
previously described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the
controllability or structural integrity of the helicopter. Therefore,
inspecting each blade within 10 hours TIS, repeating the inspection at
intervals not to exceed 30 hours TIS, and replacing the blades as
necessary before further flight are very short compliance times, and
this AD must be issued immediately.
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
The FAA estimates that this AD will affect 30 helicopters. The
required actions will take about 3 work hours to inspect a blade and 3
work hours to replace a blade at an average labor rate of $80 per work
hour. Required parts will cost about $50,000 per blade. There are three
blades per helicopter. Based on these figures, we estimate the total
cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators to be $3,588,640, assuming 71
blades are replaced.
[[Page 4484]]
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements that affect
flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for
public comment; however, we invite you to submit any written data,
views, or arguments regarding this AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0047; Directorate
Identifier 2009-SW-28-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend the AD in light of
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of our
docket Web site, you can find and read the comments to any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment. You
may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the
reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD. See the AD docket to examine the economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Amendment 39-13276 (68 FR
51681, dated August 28, 2003), and by adding a new airworthiness
directive (AD), Amendment 39-16177, to read as follows:
2010-02-07 Eurocopter France: Amendment 39-16177. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0047; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-28-AD. Supersedes AD 2003-
15-51, Amendment 39-13276, Docket No. 2003-SW-34-AD.
Applicability:
Eurocopter France Model SE3160, SA315B, SA316B, SA316C, and
SA319B helicopters, with main rotor blade (blade) part number L3160-
100-01, serial number (S/N) 600 through 671 (except those identified
with both ``SB L3160-P-001A'' and ``SB L3160-P-001B'' next to the
blade data plate), produced under a Parts Manufacturer Approval
based on Supplemental Type Certificate SH778GL, installed,
certificated in any category.
Compliance:
Required as indicated.
To prevent failure of a blade and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter, do the following:
(a) Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS), unless accomplished
previously, tap and visually inspect each blade, S/N 600 through
666, 668 through 669, and 671 (except those identified with ``SB
L3160-P-001A'' next to the blade data plate) in the root doublers
for a void and in the forward and aft edges for a paint crack in the
areas depicted in Figure 1 of Phlight of Phancy Corp. Service
Bulletin No. SB L3160-P-001, dated May 20, 2009 (SB), and by
following the Accomplishment Instructions, Part A, paragraph 2.a.
through 2.e., of the SB.
(1) If there is no void or paint crack in the root doublers or
fitting, and the only void you find is isolated in the .25 inch edge
band of a doubler or a fitting as depicted in Figure 1 of the SB,
repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 30 hours TIS.
(2) If you find a void in any doubler or any root fitting not
isolated to the .25 inch band as depicted in Figure 1 of the SB or a
paint crack of any length along the forward or aft edge of a root
fitting between Blade Stations 35.02 and 42.52, replace the blade
with an airworthy blade before further flight.
(b) Within 10 hours TIS, unless accomplished previously, inspect
each blade, S/N 600 through 671 (except those identified with ``SB
L3160-P-001B'' next to the blade data plate), in the areas depicted
in Figures 2 and 3 and by following the Accomplishment Instructions,
Part B, of the SB as follows:
(1) Remove the paint and coin tap inspect the upper and lower
surface of the No. 2 spar to tip weight housing bond as depicted in
Figure 2 of the SB for a bond void. Conduct the inspection by
following the Accomplishment Instructions, Part B, paragraphs 2.a.
through 2.e. of the SB.
(2) Using a 10X or higher magnifying glass, visually inspect the
No. 1 spar around the through pins for hole elongation, a crack in
the spar, and pin movement (pins should be flush with upper and
lower spar surfaces). Visually inspect the tip weight housing
outboard face for evidence of movement relative to the spar (tip
weight housing should be flush with the face of No. 1 and 2 spars).
(3) Measure the thickness of the upper and lower spar by using
calipers held against the face of the No. 1 spar in alignment with
the through pins as depicted in Figure 3 of the SB.
(4) If you find any of the following, replace the blade with an
airworthy blade before further flight:
(i) A void between the No. 2 spar and tip weight housing;
(ii) In the No. 1 spar, either a crack, an elongated through
pinhole, movement of a through pin, or a through pin that is not
flush with the spar surface;
(iii) Movement of the tip weight housing or a tip weight housing
that is not flush with the No. 1 and No. 2 spar; or
(iv) An upper or lower spar with thickness less than 0.045 inch.
(5) If you do not find any of the discrepancies identified in
paragraph (b)(4)(i) through (b)(4)(iv) of this AD, repeat the
inspections required by paragraph (b) of this AD at intervals not to
exceed 30 hours TIS.
(c) Replacing an affected blade with an airworthy blade with a
serial number that is not included in the ``Applicability'' section
of
[[Page 4485]]
this AD constitutes terminating action for the requirements of this
AD.
(d) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Contact the Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Rotorcraft
Certification Office, ATTN: DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Martin Crane,
ASW-170, Aviation Safety Engineer, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth,
Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222-5170, fax (817) 222-5783, for
information about previously approved alternative methods of
compliance.
(e) Special flight permits will not be issued.
(f) The Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC) Code for the
subject of this AD is Code 6210: Main rotor blades.
(g) Inspect the blades by following the specified portions of
the Phlight of Phancy Corp. Service Bulletin SB L3160-P-001, dated
May 20, 2009. The Director of the Federal Register approved this
incorporation by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Copies may be obtained from Phlight of Phancy Corp., 791 Westport
Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177-4511, telephone 817-491-6755, fax
817-491-6759. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663,
Fort Worth, Texas or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(h) This amendment becomes effective on February 12, 2010.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 8, 2010.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-1157 Filed 1-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P