Draft Guidance for Industry on Assessment of Abuse Potential of Drugs; Availability, 4400-4401 [2010-1516]

Download as PDF 4400 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 17 / Wednesday, January 27, 2010 / Notices ESTIMATE OF ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE—Continued Type of respondent Enrolled Enrolled Enrolled Enrolled Enrolled Enrolled Enrolled Number of respondents Form name Number of responses per respondent Average burden per response (in hours) Total annual burden (in hours) Participant-CSU .................. Participant-PHMC ............... Participant-Nova ................. Participant-CSU .................. Participant-PHMC ............... Participant-Nova ................. Participant-CSU .................. Acceptability Survey ......................... Immediate Follow-Up Assessment .. Immediate Follow-Up Assessment .. Immediate Follow-Up Assessment .. 3 month Follow-Up Assessment ...... 3 month Follow-Up Assessment ...... 3 month Follow-Up Assessment ...... 260 225 216 234 200 192 208 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10/60 30/60 30/60 30/60 1 1 1 43 113 108 117 200 192 208 Total ........................................... ........................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 2,250 Dated: January 20, 2010. Maryam I. Daneshvar, Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2010–1650 Filed 1–26–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2010–D–0026] Draft Guidance for Industry on Assessment of Abuse Potential of Drugs; Availability AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ‘‘Assessment of Abuse Potential of Drugs.’’ This draft guidance is intended to assist sponsors who are developing drug and other medical products with the potential for abuse that may need to be scheduled under the Controlled Substances Act. Drugs with abuse potential generally include drugs that affect the central nervous system, drugs that are chemically or pharmacologically similar to other drugs with known abuse potential, and drugs that produce psychoactive effects such as sedation, euphoria, or mood change. DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency considers your comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the guidance, submit written or electronic comments on the draft guidance by March 29, 2010. ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:22 Jan 26, 2010 Jkt 220001 Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your requests. Submit written comments on the draft guidance to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to https:// www.regulations.gov. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft guidance document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Corinne P. Moody, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 5144, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–5402. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ‘‘Assessment of Abuse Potential of Drugs.’’ Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, an abuse potential assessment is part of the general evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a drug to be used under medical supervision. If a drug has abuse potential, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) is required under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (CSA) to make a recommendation for scheduling to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). The regulatory responsibilities for this process are described in Title 21 United States Code (U.S.C.) 811, with delegation of authority to FDA from HHS. The Controlled Substance Staff (CSS) of FDA performs the scientific evaluation of the abuse potential of a drug for HHS, in consultation with the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), as described in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) of March 8, 1985 (50 FR 9518). PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 When a sponsor submits a marketing application for a drug with abuse potential to FDA for review, the sponsor is required to propose a CSA schedule and provide a basis for this proposal (21 CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vii)). The sponsor’s proposal is considered by the agency during its evaluation of the drug’s abuse potential. At the time a marketing application is submitted to FDA for review, the sponsor signs a statement agreeing not to market the product until the DEA makes a final scheduling decision. FDA prepares a scientific analysis with a recommendation for scheduling, based on the submission of the sponsor that includes a scientific and medical evaluation of all relevant and available data, an assessment of the public health risk, and a proposal for scheduling. This recommendation is forwarded to DEA for consideration in the decision on final scheduling of the drug. Scheduling results in specific regulatory requirements relating to the drug’s labeling, prescribing, advertising, manufacturing, promotion, marketing, and use in the practice of medicine. Not following these requirements can result in criminal penalties. This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA’s good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the agency’s current thinking on assessing abuse potential of drugs. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. II. Comments Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document. Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 17 / Wednesday, January 27, 2010 / Notices mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. III. Electronic Access Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ Guidances/default.htm or https:// www.regulations.gov. Dated: January 21, 2010. David Dorsey, Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget. [FR Doc. 2010–1516 Filed 1–26–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2007–D–0420] (formerly Docket No. 2007D–0365) Guidance for Industry on the Use of Mechanical Calibration of Dissolution Apparatus 1 and 2—Current Good Manufacturing Practice; Availability AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry entitled ‘‘The Use of Mechanical Calibration of Dissolution Apparatus 1 and 2—Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP).’’ This guidance recommends an alternative method for manufacturers to comply with FDA’s CGMP regulations that require laboratory apparatus be calibrated at suitable intervals in accordance with established written specifications. The guidance is intended to aid drug manufacturers (including ancillary testing laboratories) in calibrating U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) Dissolution Apparatus 1 and 2 to help assure that critical parameters associated with the dissolution apparatus meet certain mechanical calibration (MC) tolerances. DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on agency guidances at any time. Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food ADDRESSES: VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:22 Jan 26, 2010 Jkt 220001 and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your requests. Submit written comments on the guidance to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to https:// www.regulations.gov. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry A. Ouderkirk, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 4228, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–1585. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry entitled ‘‘The Use of Mechanical Calibration of Dissolution Apparatus 1 and 2—Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP).’’ The guidance recommends an alternative method for manufacturers to comply with the CGMP regulations that require laboratory apparatus be calibrated at suitable intervals in accordance with established written specifications (§§ 211.160(b)(4) and 211.68 (21 CFR 211.160(b)(4) and 211.68)). Historically, both MC and chemical (tablet) calibration procedures have been employed to assure that reproducible and repeatable data are obtained with dissolution test apparatus. Recent studies performed in FDA and USP laboratories have identified several significant sources of variation within Apparatus 1 and 2 that can be minimized by employing an enhanced MC procedure. The enhanced MC procedure recommended in the guidance can be used as an alternative to the current Apparatus Suitability procedure for USP Dissolution Apparatus 1 and 2 described in USP General Chapter <711> Dissolution that employs basic MC with a performance verification test (PVT) using USP Reference Standard tablets. In the Federal Register of October 19, 2007 (72 FR 59298), FDA published a notice announcing the availability of a draft guidance entitled ‘‘The Use of Mechanical Calibration of Dissolution Apparatus 1 and 2—Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP).’’ The notice gave interested persons an opportunity to submit comments by PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4401 January 17, 2008. Comments received during the comment period have been carefully reviewed, and changes were made to the draft guidance in an effort to make the document clearer. Also, as a result of the received comments, the guidance provides advice on controlling the following recognized sources of significant variability in dissolution testing: Dissolved gases, vibration, and vessel dimensions. In finalizing this guidance, FDA has made changes to the draft guidance to reflect the most recent changes to USP General Chapter <711> Dissolution. On August 1, 2007, USP revised its Chapter <711> as follows: (1) Changed the terminology ‘‘calibrator tablets’’ to ‘‘reference standard (RS) tablets,’’ which is the term used to describe tablets used to establish system suitability; and (2) renamed the ‘‘Apparatus Suitability Test, Apparatus 1 and 2’’ to ‘‘Performance Verification Test, Apparatus 1 and 2.’’ In making these revisions, USP has explicitly stated, ‘‘USP’s RS tablets are not calibrator tablets.’’1 USP has also announced its intention as of December 1, 2009, to discontinue use of its Salicylic Acid Tablets RS in the Performance Verification Test for Dissolution Apparatus 1 and 2 in <711> (but USP will retain use of its Prednisone Tablets RS). Although USP <711> establishes critical tolerances and parameters for dissolution apparatus, it does not describe enhanced MC practices that can optimize and assure consistent apparatus performance. In October 2007, USP posted to its Web site a ‘‘toolkit’’ to aid practitioners in performing apparatus MC. However, we note that neither the mechanical tolerances specified in USP <711> nor the MC procedure described in the USP toolkit is as comprehensive or stringent as the enhanced MC procedure recommended in the agency guidance. The CGMP regulations in §§ 211.160(b)(4) and 211.68 require that laboratory apparatus (mechanical equipment used in manufacturing) be calibrated at suitable intervals in accordance with an established written program of scheduled procedures containing provisions for remedial actions. The enhanced MC procedure recommended in the agency guidance satisfies these CGMP requirements and thus can be used as an alternative to the Apparatus Suitability procedure described in USP <711>. Furthermore, 1 Deng G., A. J. Ashley, W. E. Brown, et al., 2008, ‘‘The USP Performance Verification Test, Part I: USP Lot P Prednisone Tablets—Quality Attributes and Experimental Variables Contributing to Dissolution Variance,’’ Pharmaceutical Research; 25(5): 1100– 1109. E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4400-4401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-D-0026]


Draft Guidance for Industry on Assessment of Abuse Potential of 
Drugs; Availability

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Assessment of 
Abuse Potential of Drugs.'' This draft guidance is intended to assist 
sponsors who are developing drug and other medical products with the 
potential for abuse that may need to be scheduled under the Controlled 
Substances Act. Drugs with abuse potential generally include drugs that 
affect the central nervous system, drugs that are chemically or 
pharmacologically similar to other drugs with known abuse potential, 
and drugs that produce psychoactive effects such as sedation, euphoria, 
or mood change.

DATES:  Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 
CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency considers your comment on 
this draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the 
guidance, submit written or electronic comments on the draft guidance 
by March 29, 2010.

ADDRESSES:  Submit written requests for single copies of the draft 
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send 
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing 
your requests. Submit written comments on the draft guidance to the 
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic 
comments to https://www.regulations.gov. See the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft guidance 
document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Corinne P. Moody, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 5144, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-5402.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry 
entitled ``Assessment of Abuse Potential of Drugs.'' Under the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, an abuse potential assessment is part of 
the general evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a drug to be used 
under medical supervision. If a drug has abuse potential, the Secretary 
of Health and Human Services (HHS) is required under the Controlled 
Substances Act of 1970 (CSA) to make a recommendation for scheduling to 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). The regulatory 
responsibilities for this process are described in Title 21 United 
States Code (U.S.C.) 811, with delegation of authority to FDA from HHS. 
The Controlled Substance Staff (CSS) of FDA performs the scientific 
evaluation of the abuse potential of a drug for HHS, in consultation 
with the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), as described in a 
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) of March 8, 1985 (50 FR 9518).
    When a sponsor submits a marketing application for a drug with 
abuse potential to FDA for review, the sponsor is required to propose a 
CSA schedule and provide a basis for this proposal (21 CFR 
314.50(d)(5)(vii)). The sponsor's proposal is considered by the agency 
during its evaluation of the drug's abuse potential. At the time a 
marketing application is submitted to FDA for review, the sponsor signs 
a statement agreeing not to market the product until the DEA makes a 
final scheduling decision.
    FDA prepares a scientific analysis with a recommendation for 
scheduling, based on the submission of the sponsor that includes a 
scientific and medical evaluation of all relevant and available data, 
an assessment of the public health risk, and a proposal for scheduling. 
This recommendation is forwarded to DEA for consideration in the 
decision on final scheduling of the drug. Scheduling results in 
specific regulatory requirements relating to the drug's labeling, 
prescribing, advertising, manufacturing, promotion, marketing, and use 
in the practice of medicine. Not following these requirements can 
result in criminal penalties.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good 
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when 
finalized, will represent the agency's current thinking on assessing 
abuse potential of drugs. It does not create or confer any rights for 
or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An 
alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the 
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management 
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document. 
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any

[[Page 4401]]

mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. 
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets 
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the 
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday 
through Friday.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at 
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: January 21, 2010.
David Dorsey,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2010-1516 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.