Draft Guidance for Industry on Assessment of Abuse Potential of Drugs; Availability, 4400-4401 [2010-1516]
Download as PDF
4400
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 17 / Wednesday, January 27, 2010 / Notices
ESTIMATE OF ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE—Continued
Type of respondent
Enrolled
Enrolled
Enrolled
Enrolled
Enrolled
Enrolled
Enrolled
Number of
respondents
Form name
Number of responses per
respondent
Average burden per
response
(in hours)
Total annual
burden
(in hours)
Participant-CSU ..................
Participant-PHMC ...............
Participant-Nova .................
Participant-CSU ..................
Participant-PHMC ...............
Participant-Nova .................
Participant-CSU ..................
Acceptability Survey .........................
Immediate Follow-Up Assessment ..
Immediate Follow-Up Assessment ..
Immediate Follow-Up Assessment ..
3 month Follow-Up Assessment ......
3 month Follow-Up Assessment ......
3 month Follow-Up Assessment ......
260
225
216
234
200
192
208
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
1
1
1
43
113
108
117
200
192
208
Total ...........................................
...........................................................
........................
........................
........................
2,250
Dated: January 20, 2010.
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010–1650 Filed 1–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–D–0026]
Draft Guidance for Industry on
Assessment of Abuse Potential of
Drugs; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for
industry entitled ‘‘Assessment of Abuse
Potential of Drugs.’’ This draft guidance
is intended to assist sponsors who are
developing drug and other medical
products with the potential for abuse
that may need to be scheduled under
the Controlled Substances Act. Drugs
with abuse potential generally include
drugs that affect the central nervous
system, drugs that are chemically or
pharmacologically similar to other drugs
with known abuse potential, and drugs
that produce psychoactive effects such
as sedation, euphoria, or mood change.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency
considers your comment on this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
written or electronic comments on the
draft guidance by March 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:22 Jan 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your
requests. Submit written comments on
the draft guidance to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the draft guidance
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Corinne P. Moody, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 5144,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–5402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a draft guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Assessment of Abuse Potential of
Drugs.’’ Under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act, an abuse potential
assessment is part of the general
evaluation of the safety and efficacy of
a drug to be used under medical
supervision. If a drug has abuse
potential, the Secretary of Health and
Human Services (HHS) is required
under the Controlled Substances Act of
1970 (CSA) to make a recommendation
for scheduling to the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA). The regulatory
responsibilities for this process are
described in Title 21 United States Code
(U.S.C.) 811, with delegation of
authority to FDA from HHS. The
Controlled Substance Staff (CSS) of FDA
performs the scientific evaluation of the
abuse potential of a drug for HHS, in
consultation with the National Institute
on Drug Abuse (NIDA), as described in
a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) of March 8, 1985 (50 FR 9518).
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
When a sponsor submits a marketing
application for a drug with abuse
potential to FDA for review, the sponsor
is required to propose a CSA schedule
and provide a basis for this proposal (21
CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vii)). The sponsor’s
proposal is considered by the agency
during its evaluation of the drug’s abuse
potential. At the time a marketing
application is submitted to FDA for
review, the sponsor signs a statement
agreeing not to market the product until
the DEA makes a final scheduling
decision.
FDA prepares a scientific analysis
with a recommendation for scheduling,
based on the submission of the sponsor
that includes a scientific and medical
evaluation of all relevant and available
data, an assessment of the public health
risk, and a proposal for scheduling. This
recommendation is forwarded to DEA
for consideration in the decision on
final scheduling of the drug. Scheduling
results in specific regulatory
requirements relating to the drug’s
labeling, prescribing, advertising,
manufacturing, promotion, marketing,
and use in the practice of medicine. Not
following these requirements can result
in criminal penalties.
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the agency’s current thinking
on assessing abuse potential of drugs. It
does not create or confer any rights for
or on any person and does not operate
to bind FDA or the public. An
alternative approach may be used if
such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 17 / Wednesday, January 27, 2010 / Notices
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: January 21, 2010.
David Dorsey,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy,
Planning and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2010–1516 Filed 1–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2007–D–0420] (formerly
Docket No. 2007D–0365)
Guidance for Industry on the Use of
Mechanical Calibration of Dissolution
Apparatus 1 and 2—Current Good
Manufacturing Practice; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘The Use of Mechanical
Calibration of Dissolution Apparatus 1
and 2—Current Good Manufacturing
Practice (CGMP).’’ This guidance
recommends an alternative method for
manufacturers to comply with FDA’s
CGMP regulations that require
laboratory apparatus be calibrated at
suitable intervals in accordance with
established written specifications. The
guidance is intended to aid drug
manufacturers (including ancillary
testing laboratories) in calibrating U.S.
Pharmacopeia (USP) Dissolution
Apparatus 1 and 2 to help assure that
critical parameters associated with the
dissolution apparatus meet certain
mechanical calibration (MC) tolerances.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on agency guidances at any
time.
Submit written requests for
single copies of this guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:22 Jan 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your
requests. Submit written comments on
the guidance to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the guidance
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry A. Ouderkirk, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 4228,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–1585.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a guidance for industry entitled ‘‘The
Use of Mechanical Calibration of
Dissolution Apparatus 1 and 2—Current
Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP).’’
The guidance recommends an
alternative method for manufacturers to
comply with the CGMP regulations that
require laboratory apparatus be
calibrated at suitable intervals in
accordance with established written
specifications (§§ 211.160(b)(4) and
211.68 (21 CFR 211.160(b)(4) and
211.68)).
Historically, both MC and chemical
(tablet) calibration procedures have
been employed to assure that
reproducible and repeatable data are
obtained with dissolution test
apparatus. Recent studies performed in
FDA and USP laboratories have
identified several significant sources of
variation within Apparatus 1 and 2 that
can be minimized by employing an
enhanced MC procedure. The enhanced
MC procedure recommended in the
guidance can be used as an alternative
to the current Apparatus Suitability
procedure for USP Dissolution
Apparatus 1 and 2 described in USP
General Chapter <711> Dissolution that
employs basic MC with a performance
verification test (PVT) using USP
Reference Standard tablets.
In the Federal Register of October 19,
2007 (72 FR 59298), FDA published a
notice announcing the availability of a
draft guidance entitled ‘‘The Use of
Mechanical Calibration of Dissolution
Apparatus 1 and 2—Current Good
Manufacturing Practice (CGMP).’’ The
notice gave interested persons an
opportunity to submit comments by
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4401
January 17, 2008. Comments received
during the comment period have been
carefully reviewed, and changes were
made to the draft guidance in an effort
to make the document clearer. Also, as
a result of the received comments, the
guidance provides advice on controlling
the following recognized sources of
significant variability in dissolution
testing: Dissolved gases, vibration, and
vessel dimensions.
In finalizing this guidance, FDA has
made changes to the draft guidance to
reflect the most recent changes to USP
General Chapter <711> Dissolution. On
August 1, 2007, USP revised its Chapter
<711> as follows: (1) Changed the
terminology ‘‘calibrator tablets’’ to
‘‘reference standard (RS) tablets,’’ which
is the term used to describe tablets used
to establish system suitability; and (2)
renamed the ‘‘Apparatus Suitability
Test, Apparatus 1 and 2’’ to
‘‘Performance Verification Test,
Apparatus 1 and 2.’’ In making these
revisions, USP has explicitly stated,
‘‘USP’s RS tablets are not calibrator
tablets.’’1 USP has also announced its
intention as of December 1, 2009, to
discontinue use of its Salicylic Acid
Tablets RS in the Performance
Verification Test for Dissolution
Apparatus 1 and 2 in <711> (but USP
will retain use of its Prednisone Tablets
RS). Although USP <711> establishes
critical tolerances and parameters for
dissolution apparatus, it does not
describe enhanced MC practices that
can optimize and assure consistent
apparatus performance. In October
2007, USP posted to its Web site a
‘‘toolkit’’ to aid practitioners in
performing apparatus MC. However, we
note that neither the mechanical
tolerances specified in USP <711> nor
the MC procedure described in the USP
toolkit is as comprehensive or stringent
as the enhanced MC procedure
recommended in the agency guidance.
The CGMP regulations in
§§ 211.160(b)(4) and 211.68 require that
laboratory apparatus (mechanical
equipment used in manufacturing) be
calibrated at suitable intervals in
accordance with an established written
program of scheduled procedures
containing provisions for remedial
actions. The enhanced MC procedure
recommended in the agency guidance
satisfies these CGMP requirements and
thus can be used as an alternative to the
Apparatus Suitability procedure
described in USP <711>. Furthermore,
1 Deng G., A. J. Ashley, W. E. Brown, et al., 2008,
‘‘The USP Performance Verification Test, Part I: USP
Lot P Prednisone Tablets—Quality Attributes and
Experimental Variables Contributing to Dissolution
Variance,’’ Pharmaceutical Research; 25(5): 1100–
1109.
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4400-4401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1516]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2010-D-0026]
Draft Guidance for Industry on Assessment of Abuse Potential of
Drugs; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Assessment of
Abuse Potential of Drugs.'' This draft guidance is intended to assist
sponsors who are developing drug and other medical products with the
potential for abuse that may need to be scheduled under the Controlled
Substances Act. Drugs with abuse potential generally include drugs that
affect the central nervous system, drugs that are chemically or
pharmacologically similar to other drugs with known abuse potential,
and drugs that produce psychoactive effects such as sedation, euphoria,
or mood change.
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21
CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency considers your comment on
this draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit written or electronic comments on the draft guidance
by March 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your requests. Submit written comments on the draft guidance to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic
comments to https://www.regulations.gov. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft guidance
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Corinne P. Moody, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 5144, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-5402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Assessment of Abuse Potential of Drugs.'' Under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, an abuse potential assessment is part of
the general evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a drug to be used
under medical supervision. If a drug has abuse potential, the Secretary
of Health and Human Services (HHS) is required under the Controlled
Substances Act of 1970 (CSA) to make a recommendation for scheduling to
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). The regulatory
responsibilities for this process are described in Title 21 United
States Code (U.S.C.) 811, with delegation of authority to FDA from HHS.
The Controlled Substance Staff (CSS) of FDA performs the scientific
evaluation of the abuse potential of a drug for HHS, in consultation
with the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), as described in a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) of March 8, 1985 (50 FR 9518).
When a sponsor submits a marketing application for a drug with
abuse potential to FDA for review, the sponsor is required to propose a
CSA schedule and provide a basis for this proposal (21 CFR
314.50(d)(5)(vii)). The sponsor's proposal is considered by the agency
during its evaluation of the drug's abuse potential. At the time a
marketing application is submitted to FDA for review, the sponsor signs
a statement agreeing not to market the product until the DEA makes a
final scheduling decision.
FDA prepares a scientific analysis with a recommendation for
scheduling, based on the submission of the sponsor that includes a
scientific and medical evaluation of all relevant and available data,
an assessment of the public health risk, and a proposal for scheduling.
This recommendation is forwarded to DEA for consideration in the
decision on final scheduling of the drug. Scheduling results in
specific regulatory requirements relating to the drug's labeling,
prescribing, advertising, manufacturing, promotion, marketing, and use
in the practice of medicine. Not following these requirements can
result in criminal penalties.
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the agency's current thinking on assessing
abuse potential of drugs. It does not create or confer any rights for
or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An
alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
[[Page 4401]]
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: January 21, 2010.
David Dorsey,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2010-1516 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S