Pipeline Safety: Leak Detection on Hazardous Liquid Pipelines, 4134-4136 [2010-1497]
Download as PDF
4134
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2010 / Notices
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
the United States Trade Representative,
1724 F Street, NW., Washington, DC
20508. The telephone number is (202)
395–6971, the fax number is (202) 395–
2961, and the e-mail address is
Tameka_Cooper@ustr.eop.gov.
DATES: The schedule for reviewing the
petition for the withdrawal of duty-free
treatment under the GSP program for
certain sleeping bags (HTS9404.30.80) is
set forth below. Notice of any changes
to the schedule will be given in the
Federal Register.
February 12, 2010—Comments on the
petition must be submitted by 5 p.m.
April 2010—The USITC is scheduled
to provide a report providing advice on
the potential impacts on U.S. industry
and consumers with respect to the
petition.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The GSP
program provides for the duty-free
importation of eligible articles when
imported from designated beneficiary
developing countries. The GSP program
is authorized by Title V of the Trade Act
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2461, et seq.), as
amended (the ‘‘1974 Act’’), and is
implemented in accordance with
Executive Order 11888 of November 24,
1975, as modified by subsequent
Executive Orders and Presidential
Proclamations.
The GSP Subcommittee of the Trade
Policy Staff Committee (TPSC) has
accepted for review a petition to
withdraw duty-free treatment under the
GSP for certain sleeping bags
(HTS9404.30.80). Additional
information regarding this petition is
provided in ‘‘Petition Accepted for
Review—Sleeping Bags’’ at https://
www.regulations.gov, docket number
USTR–2010–0004. Acceptance of a
petition for review does not indicate any
opinion with respect to the disposition
on the merits of the petition.
Acceptance indicates only that the
petition has been found eligible for
review and that such review will take
place.
Opportunities for Public Comment
The GSP Subcommittee of the TPSC
invites written comments in support of
or in opposition to the petition to
withdraw duty-free treatment under the
GSP for certain sleeping bags in
addition to comments on the advice
provided by the U.S. International Trade
Commission.
Requirements for Submissions and
Inspection of Comments
The GSP regulations (15 CFR Part
2007) set forth the kind information that
should be included in written
comments. Submissions should comply
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:10 Jan 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
with the GSP regulations, except as
modified below. All submissions should
include the case number and eight-digit
HTSUS subheading number as shown in
the ‘‘Petition Accepted for Review—
Sleeping Bags’’ available at: https://
www.ustr.gov/trade-topics/tradedevelopment/preference-programs/
generalized-system-preference-gsp/
current-review-1 and in
www.regulations.gov, docket number
USTR–2010–0004 All non-business
confidential comments will be available
for review at www.regulations.gov,
docket number USTR–2010–0004.
Submissions in response to this notice
(including written comments and all
business confidential submissions),
must be submitted electronically by the
relevant deadline listed above using
www.regulations.gov., docket number
USTR–2010–0004. Instructions for
submitting business confidential
versions are provided below. Handdelivered submissions will not be
accepted. Submissions must be
submitted in English to the Chairman of
the GSP Subcommittee, Trade Policy
Staff Committee, by the applicable
deadlines set forth in this notice.
To make a submission using
www.regulations.gov, enter docket
number USTR–2010–0004 on the home
page and click ‘‘Search.’’ The site will
provide a search-results page listing all
documents associated with this docket.
Locate the reference to this notice by
selecting ‘‘Notices’’ under ‘‘Document
Type’’. Locate the reference to this
notice by selecting ‘‘Notices’’ under
‘‘Document Type’’ on the left side of the
search-results page, and click on the
link entitled ‘‘Submit a Comment’’. (For
further information on using the
www.regulations.gov Web site, please
consult the resources provided on the
Web site by clicking ‘‘How to Use This
Site’’ on the left side of the home page.)
The www.regulations.gov Web site
offers the option of providing comments
by filling in a ‘‘Type Comment and
Upload File’’ field or by attaching a
document. USTR prefers for comments
to be provided in an attached document.
If a document is attached, it is sufficient
to type ‘‘See attached’’ in the ‘‘Type
Comment and Upload File’’ field.
Comments must be in English, with
the total submission not to exceed 30
single-spaced standard letter-size pages
in 12-point type, including attachments.
Any data attachments to the submission
should be included in the same file as
the submission itself, and not as
separate files.
Any person or party making a
submission is strongly advised to review
the GSP regulations and GSP Guidebook
(available at: https://www.ustr.gov/trade-
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
topics/trade-development/preferenceprograms/generalized-systempreference-gsp/gsp-program-inf).
Business Confidential Submissions
A person requesting that information
contained in a comment submitted by
that person be treated as confidential
business information must certify that
such information is business
confidential and would not customarily
be released to the public by the
submitter. Confidential business
information must be clearly designated
as such, the submission must be marked
‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ at the top
and bottom of the cover page and each
succeeding page, and the submission
should indicate, via brackets, the
specific information that is confidential.
Additionally, ‘‘Business Confidential’’
should be included in the ‘‘Type
comment & Upload file’’ field. Anyone
submitting a comment containing
business confidential information must
also submit as a separate submission a
non-confidential version of the
confidential submission, indicating
where confidential information has been
redacted. The non-confidential
summary will be placed in the docket
and open to public inspection.
Marideth Sandler,
Executive Director, Generalized System of
Preferences (GSP) Program, and Chair, GSP
Subcommittee, Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative.
[FR Doc. 2010–1325 Filed 1–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190–W0–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2009–0421]
Pipeline Safety: Leak Detection on
Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration; DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Issuance of Advisory
Bulletin.
SUMMARY: The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) is issuing this Advisory
Bulletin to advise and remind
hazardous liquid pipeline operators of
the importance of prompt and effective
leak detection capability in protecting
public safety and the environment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Mayberry by phone at 202–366–
5124 or by e-mail at
alan.mayberry@dot.gov regarding the
subject matter of this Advisory Bulletin,
E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM
26JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2010 / Notices
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
or the Dockets Unit, 202–366–4453, for
copies of this Advisory Bulletin or other
material in the docket. All materials in
this docket may be accessed
electronically at https://dms.dot.gov.
General information about the PHMSA
Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) can be
obtained by accessing OPS’s Internet
home page at https://
www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Pipeline leak detection is one of the
many layers of protection in PHMSA’s
approach to protecting people and the
environment. The federal hazardous
liquid pipeline safety regulations
require pipeline operators to deploy a
comprehensive set of safety measures to
protect the public and the environment
including an effective means of
identifying and responding to hazardous
liquid pipeline leaks at the earliest
possible time. Pipeline operators are
continuously improving the cumulative
performance of these interconnected
layers of protections, including
advances in leak detection systems.
These protections include, but are not
limited to: Customized leak detection
technology deployment; periodic riskbased assessment and defect repair
prioritized by environmental and safety
consequences; corrosion management;
pipeline right-of-way surveillance;
public awareness activities resulting in
enhanced citizen leak condition
recognition and response; emergency
preparedness and coordinated response,
including ongoing liaison efforts with
emergency responders; and a review
and incorporation of lessons learned
from accident analyses and
investigations.
Recently, the National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB) issued a safety
study on pipeline Supervisory Control
and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems
(NTSB/SS–05/02). The number of
hazardous liquid accidents investigated
by the NTSB in which leaks went
undetected after indications of a leak on
the SCADA interface was the impetus
for this study. The NTSB examined 13
hazardous liquid pipeline accidents that
they investigated from April 1992 to
October 2004. The conclusions made by
the NTSB in the study reflected the
importance of monitoring systems,
promptly recognizing leak incidents,
and minimizing damage with quick
response. PHMSA encourages all
hazardous liquid pipeline operators to
review the safety study which is
available on the NTSB webpage.
Under current regulations, all
hazardous liquid pipeline operators are
required to periodically patrol their
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:10 Jan 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
pipeline right-of-ways. This effort is
performed principally to guard against
third-party activity that has the
potential to damage the pipeline, and is
also performed to detect very small
leaks not detected by other means.
Often, the leaking product has impacted
vegetation or has pooled on the surface,
and therefore leaves visual cues.
Conducting these surveillance activities
is very important, but they are not
sufficient on their own to address all
aspects of leak detection. Hazardous
liquid pipeline operators are also
expected to track product movement
along the pipelines in order to ensure
that all product going into the pipeline
arrives at interim storage points, and
eventually reaches its destination. This
traditional and basic method of leak
detection by tracking product movement
is essential to an understanding of line
balance. Relatively short pipelines,
operating with a single source and a
single destination, can usually perform
this process rather simply, if adequate
and timely information is made
available. With these more simple
pipelines, the line balance technique for
leak detection can often be performed
with manual calculations, without the
need of a computerized process. Those
pipeline operators with longer and more
complex systems, with multiple sources
and/or destinations, are more dependent
on computerized processes to perform a
thorough product tracking resulting in a
leak detection process. The more
complex a pipeline operation, especially
when carrying numerous products
through batch operations, the greater the
need for a sophisticated leak detection
process.
Currently, there are 421 hazardous
liquid pipeline operators. Two hundred
and twenty of the operators have
pipelines less than 50 miles long, 96
operators have pipelines 50 to 250 miles
long, and 105 operators have pipelines
longer than 250 miles in length. Many
of the operators with higher mileage
have configured their pipelines into
networks, sometimes collecting product
from multiple sources and delivering
product to multiple destinations,
making the leak detection process
complex. At the same time, we
recognize that in some cases the
engineering analysis performed on
point-to-point pipeline systems has
determined that installing a computerbased leak detection system does not
offer substantial improvements in leak
detection capability beyond that of a
simple manual line balance calculation
process.
Under 49 CFR 195.444, pipeline
operators using a computer-based leak
detection system are required to comply
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4135
with API RP 1130. Pipeline operators
who do not employ computerized leak
detection still need to safely and
effectively perform the basic process of
monitoring flow and pressure to detect
large pipeline breaks. The line balance
processes incorporating SCADA or other
technology are geared to find less
obvious failures such as partial line
breaks and smaller leaks not apparent in
general flow and pressure monitoring.
When a pipeline operator has
determined or selected to use a
traditional line balance process through
manual calculation, it is PHMSA’s
expectation that these operators would
have systems configured and staffed in
such a manner as to routinely, safely
and accurately perform this manual
calculation process at a maximum of
one-hour intervals. The appropriate
interval should be determined by
engineering review, but should not
exceed one hour. This hourly process is
especially important any time product is
flowing; but since leaks can occur at any
time, all unexplained meter movements
or pressure changes should be promptly
investigated to minimize potential leak
durations even if a line segment is
shutdown. In addition, operators need
to ensure open and regular
communication between all active
source and delivery points along the
pipeline, either through verbal
communication or through the use of
SCADA or other similar technology.
Operators of point-to-point hazardous
liquid pipeline systems are obligated to
have a prompt and effective means of
detecting and responding to leaks. In
order to ensure the safe and
environmentally sound operation of
their hazardous liquid pipelines, the
operating plans and procedures required
by the pipeline safety regulations
should include the performance of an
engineering analysis to determine if a
computerized leak detection system is
necessary and appropriate. If the
analysis determines that a computerized
leak detection system is unnecessary,
the operator should perform a line
balance calculation and review process
at no greater than one-hour intervals
whenever product is flowing through
the line, and monitor for pressure
changes, meter movement and tank
level changes even when the line is not
flowing. As part of the recordkeeping
requirements under current regulations,
operators must retain documentation
from any related engineering analyses
for the computerized leak detection and
line balance considerations to
demonstrate the thoroughness of review
during an inspection.
E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM
26JAN1
4136
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2010 / Notices
II. Advisory Bulletin ADB–10–01
To: Owners or Operators of Hazardous
Liquid Pipelines.
Subject: Leak Detection on Hazardous
Liquid Pipelines.
Advisory: The Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) is advising
and reminding hazardous liquid
pipeline operators of the importance of
prompt and effective leak detection
capability in protecting public safety
and the environment. In order to ensure
the safe and environmentally sound
operation of their hazardous liquid
pipelines, the operating plans and
procedures required by the pipeline
safety regulations should include the
performance of an engineering analysis
to determine if a computer-based leak
detection system is necessary to
improve leak detection performance and
line balance processes. If an operator
that does not have a computer-based
leak detection system performs an
engineering analysis and determines
that such a system would not improve
leak detection performance and line
balance processes, the operator should
perform the periodic line balance
calculation process outlined herein and
take any other necessary actions
required to ensure public safety and
protect the environment.
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 19,
2010.
Jeffrey D. Wiese,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2010–1497 Filed 1–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2009–0377]
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Pipeline Safety: Request To Modify
Special Permit
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA); DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Reopening of Comment
Period on the Kern River Gas
Transmission Company’s Request to
Modify Condition 35 of a Previously
Issued Special Permit.
SUMMARY: PHMSA is reopening the
comment period for its Federal Register
Notice issued on November 17, 2009 (73
FR 59342), that gave notice of a request
from the Kern River Gas Transmission
Company (Kern River), for modification
of an existing special permit, PHMSA–
2007–29078, granted to the company on
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:10 Jan 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
November 8, 2008. Kern River seeks
modification of Condition 35 of the
special permit, which concerns the
external coating on its gas pipeline.
DATES: Submit any comments regarding
this special permit modification request
by February 9, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments should reference
the docket number for this special
permit and may be submitted in the
following ways:
• E-Gov Web Site: https://
www.Regulations.gov. This site allows
the public to enter comments on any
Federal Register notice issued by any
agency.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management System:
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: DOT Docket
Management System; U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Instructions: Identify the docket
number, PHMSA–2007–29078, at the
beginning of your comments. If you
submit your comments by mail, please
submit two copies. To receive
confirmation that PHMSA received your
comments, include a self-addressed
stamped postcard. Internet users may
submit comments at https://
www.regulations.gov. Note: Comments
are posted without changes or edits to
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Privacy Act Statement: Anyone can
search the electronic form of comments
received in response to any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement
was published in the Federal Register
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
General: Kay McIver by telephone at
(202) 366–0113; or, e-mail at
kay.mciver@dot.gov.
Technical: Steve Nanney by telephone
at (713) 272–2855; or, e-mail at
steve.nanney@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PHMSA is
reopening the comment period for 14
days from date of publication to allow
for public review of documents recently
added to the docket.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118(c)(1) and 49
CFR 1.53.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 19,
2010.
Jeffrey D. Wiese,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2010–1472 Filed 1–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2010–0016]
Pipeline Safety: Requests for Special
Permit
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA); DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: PHMSA is publishing this
notice of special permit requests we
have received from two pipeline
operators, seeking relief from
compliance with certain requirements
in the Federal pipeline safety
regulations. This notice seeks public
comments on these requests, including
comments on any safety or
environmental impacts. At the
conclusion of the 30-day comment
period, PHMSA will evaluate each
request and determine whether to grant
or deny a special permit.
DATES: Submit any comments regarding
these special permit requests by
February 25, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments should reference
the docket numbers for the specific
special permit requests and may be
submitted in the following ways:
• E-Gov Web Site: https://
www.Regulations.gov. This site allows
the public to enter comments on any
Federal Register notice issued by any
agency.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management System:
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: DOT Docket
Management System: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590,
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Instructions: You should identify the
docket number for the special permit
request you are commenting on at the
beginning of your comments. If you
submit your comments by mail, please
E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM
26JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4134-4136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1497]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA-2009-0421]
Pipeline Safety: Leak Detection on Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration; DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Issuance of Advisory Bulletin.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) is issuing this Advisory Bulletin to advise and remind
hazardous liquid pipeline operators of the importance of prompt and
effective leak detection capability in protecting public safety and the
environment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Mayberry by phone at 202-366-5124
or by e-mail at alan.mayberry@dot.gov regarding the subject matter of
this Advisory Bulletin,
[[Page 4135]]
or the Dockets Unit, 202-366-4453, for copies of this Advisory Bulletin
or other material in the docket. All materials in this docket may be
accessed electronically at https://dms.dot.gov. General information
about the PHMSA Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) can be obtained by
accessing OPS's Internet home page at https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Pipeline leak detection is one of the many layers of protection in
PHMSA's approach to protecting people and the environment. The federal
hazardous liquid pipeline safety regulations require pipeline operators
to deploy a comprehensive set of safety measures to protect the public
and the environment including an effective means of identifying and
responding to hazardous liquid pipeline leaks at the earliest possible
time. Pipeline operators are continuously improving the cumulative
performance of these interconnected layers of protections, including
advances in leak detection systems. These protections include, but are
not limited to: Customized leak detection technology deployment;
periodic risk-based assessment and defect repair prioritized by
environmental and safety consequences; corrosion management; pipeline
right-of-way surveillance; public awareness activities resulting in
enhanced citizen leak condition recognition and response; emergency
preparedness and coordinated response, including ongoing liaison
efforts with emergency responders; and a review and incorporation of
lessons learned from accident analyses and investigations.
Recently, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued a
safety study on pipeline Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
(SCADA) systems (NTSB/SS-05/02). The number of hazardous liquid
accidents investigated by the NTSB in which leaks went undetected after
indications of a leak on the SCADA interface was the impetus for this
study. The NTSB examined 13 hazardous liquid pipeline accidents that
they investigated from April 1992 to October 2004. The conclusions made
by the NTSB in the study reflected the importance of monitoring
systems, promptly recognizing leak incidents, and minimizing damage
with quick response. PHMSA encourages all hazardous liquid pipeline
operators to review the safety study which is available on the NTSB
webpage.
Under current regulations, all hazardous liquid pipeline operators
are required to periodically patrol their pipeline right-of-ways. This
effort is performed principally to guard against third-party activity
that has the potential to damage the pipeline, and is also performed to
detect very small leaks not detected by other means. Often, the leaking
product has impacted vegetation or has pooled on the surface, and
therefore leaves visual cues. Conducting these surveillance activities
is very important, but they are not sufficient on their own to address
all aspects of leak detection. Hazardous liquid pipeline operators are
also expected to track product movement along the pipelines in order to
ensure that all product going into the pipeline arrives at interim
storage points, and eventually reaches its destination. This
traditional and basic method of leak detection by tracking product
movement is essential to an understanding of line balance. Relatively
short pipelines, operating with a single source and a single
destination, can usually perform this process rather simply, if
adequate and timely information is made available. With these more
simple pipelines, the line balance technique for leak detection can
often be performed with manual calculations, without the need of a
computerized process. Those pipeline operators with longer and more
complex systems, with multiple sources and/or destinations, are more
dependent on computerized processes to perform a thorough product
tracking resulting in a leak detection process. The more complex a
pipeline operation, especially when carrying numerous products through
batch operations, the greater the need for a sophisticated leak
detection process.
Currently, there are 421 hazardous liquid pipeline operators. Two
hundred and twenty of the operators have pipelines less than 50 miles
long, 96 operators have pipelines 50 to 250 miles long, and 105
operators have pipelines longer than 250 miles in length. Many of the
operators with higher mileage have configured their pipelines into
networks, sometimes collecting product from multiple sources and
delivering product to multiple destinations, making the leak detection
process complex. At the same time, we recognize that in some cases the
engineering analysis performed on point-to-point pipeline systems has
determined that installing a computer-based leak detection system does
not offer substantial improvements in leak detection capability beyond
that of a simple manual line balance calculation process.
Under 49 CFR 195.444, pipeline operators using a computer-based
leak detection system are required to comply with API RP 1130. Pipeline
operators who do not employ computerized leak detection still need to
safely and effectively perform the basic process of monitoring flow and
pressure to detect large pipeline breaks. The line balance processes
incorporating SCADA or other technology are geared to find less obvious
failures such as partial line breaks and smaller leaks not apparent in
general flow and pressure monitoring. When a pipeline operator has
determined or selected to use a traditional line balance process
through manual calculation, it is PHMSA's expectation that these
operators would have systems configured and staffed in such a manner as
to routinely, safely and accurately perform this manual calculation
process at a maximum of one-hour intervals. The appropriate interval
should be determined by engineering review, but should not exceed one
hour. This hourly process is especially important any time product is
flowing; but since leaks can occur at any time, all unexplained meter
movements or pressure changes should be promptly investigated to
minimize potential leak durations even if a line segment is shutdown.
In addition, operators need to ensure open and regular communication
between all active source and delivery points along the pipeline,
either through verbal communication or through the use of SCADA or
other similar technology.
Operators of point-to-point hazardous liquid pipeline systems are
obligated to have a prompt and effective means of detecting and
responding to leaks. In order to ensure the safe and environmentally
sound operation of their hazardous liquid pipelines, the operating
plans and procedures required by the pipeline safety regulations should
include the performance of an engineering analysis to determine if a
computerized leak detection system is necessary and appropriate. If the
analysis determines that a computerized leak detection system is
unnecessary, the operator should perform a line balance calculation and
review process at no greater than one-hour intervals whenever product
is flowing through the line, and monitor for pressure changes, meter
movement and tank level changes even when the line is not flowing. As
part of the recordkeeping requirements under current regulations,
operators must retain documentation from any related engineering
analyses for the computerized leak detection and line balance
considerations to demonstrate the thoroughness of review during an
inspection.
[[Page 4136]]
II. Advisory Bulletin ADB-10-01
To: Owners or Operators of Hazardous Liquid Pipelines.
Subject: Leak Detection on Hazardous Liquid Pipelines.
Advisory: The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) is advising and reminding hazardous liquid
pipeline operators of the importance of prompt and effective leak
detection capability in protecting public safety and the environment.
In order to ensure the safe and environmentally sound operation of
their hazardous liquid pipelines, the operating plans and procedures
required by the pipeline safety regulations should include the
performance of an engineering analysis to determine if a computer-based
leak detection system is necessary to improve leak detection
performance and line balance processes. If an operator that does not
have a computer-based leak detection system performs an engineering
analysis and determines that such a system would not improve leak
detection performance and line balance processes, the operator should
perform the periodic line balance calculation process outlined herein
and take any other necessary actions required to ensure public safety
and protect the environment.
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 19, 2010.
Jeffrey D. Wiese,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2010-1497 Filed 1-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P