Medicare Program; Approval of Independent Accrediting Organizations To Participate in the Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Supplier Accreditation Program, 4088-4089 [2010-1457]

Download as PDF 4088 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2010 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS–6023–N2] Medicare Program; Approval of Independent Accrediting Organizations To Participate in the Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Supplier Accreditation Program Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This notice announces our approval of the following three national accreditation organizations to accredit suppliers seeking to furnish the technical component (TC) of advanced diagnostic imaging services under the Medicare program: the American College of Radiology (ACR); the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC); and The Joint Commission (TJC). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: August Nemec, (410) 786–0612. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Section 135(a) of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) added section 1834(e) of the Social Security Act (the Act) that requires the Secretary to designate organizations in order to accredit suppliers furnishing the technical component (TC) of advanced diagnostic imaging service and establish procedures to ensure that the criteria used by an accreditation organization is specific to each imaging modality. Section 1834(e)(1)(B) of the Act defines advanced diagnostic imaging services as— WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES (i) Diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and nuclear medicine-including positron emission tomography; and (ii) Such other diagnostic imaging services, including services described in section 1848(b)(4)(B) (excluding x-ray, ultrasound, and fluoroscopy), as specified by the Secretary in consultation with physician specialty organizations and other stakeholders. Section 1848(b)(4)(B) of the Act defines imaging services as ‘‘imaging and computer-assisted imaging services, including x-ray, ultrasound (including echocardiography), nuclear medicine (including positron emission tomography), magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and fluoroscopy, but excluding diagnostic and screening mammography. Suppliers, including physicians, non- VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:10 Jan 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 physician practitioners and physician and non-physician organizations, of the TC of advanced diagnostic imaging services for which payment is made under the fee schedule established under section 1848(b) of the Act, must become accredited by a designated accreditation organization designated by the Secretary beginning January 1, 2012. II. Application Requirements, Review, and Approval The application requirements for accrediting organizations were finalized in the Physician Fee Schedule final rule published on November 25, 2009 (74 FR 61738) and set forth as application criteria in a November 25, 2009 Federal Register notice (74 FR 62189), as corrected in the November 30, 2009 correction notice (74 FR 62579). We received three applications from our solicitation of accrediting organizations. An internal professional panel reviewed and compared the standards contained in the applications with our requirements in 42 CFR 414.68. Accordingly, to be considered for approval as a designated accreditation organization, each of accreditation organization had to furnish the following information specified in 42 CFR 414.l68: • A list of the categories of advanced diagnostic imaging services for which the organization is requesting approval. • A description of the accrediting organization’s duration of accreditation (annual, biennual, and triennial), to include a summary of activities that occur at each cycle. • A detailed description of how the organization’s accreditation criteria satisfy the statutory standards at section 1834(e)(3) of the Act, including the following: ++ Qualifications of medical personnel who are not physicians and who furnish the TC of advanced diagnostic imaging services. ++ Qualifications and responsibilities of medical directors and supervising physicians, such as training in advanced diagnostic imaging services in a residency program, expertise obtained through experience or continuing medical education courses. ++ Procedures to ensure the safety of persons who furnish the TC of advanced diagnostic imaging services and individuals to whom such services are furnished. ++ Procedures to ensure the reliability, clarity, and accuracy of the technical quality of diagnostic images produced by the supplier. ++ Procedures to assist the beneficiary in obtaining the PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 beneficiary’s imaging records on request. ++ Procedures to notify CMS of any changes to the modalities subsequent to the organization’s accreditation decision. • An agreement to conform accreditation requirements to any changes in Medicare statutory requirements authorized by 1834(e) of the Act. • An agreement to maintain or adopt standards that are equal to, or more stringent than, those of Medicare. • Information that demonstrates the accreditation organization’s knowledge and experience in the advanced diagnostic imaging arena. • A plan for reducing the burden and cost of accreditation to small and rural suppliers— ++ The organization’s proposed fees for accreditation for each modality in which the organization intends to offer accreditation; and ++ Any specific documentation requirements and attestations requested by CMS as a condition of designation. • A detailed description of the organization’s survey process, to include the following: ++ Type and frequency of the surveys performed. ++ The ability of the organization to conduct timely reviews of accreditation applications, to include a projection of the organization’s national capacity for processing new applications before the January 1, 2012 accreditation deadline. ++ Description of the organization’s audit procedures, including random site visits; site audits or other strategies for ensuring suppliers accredited by the organization maintain compliance throughout the period of accreditation. ++ Procedures for performing unannounced site surveys. ++ Copies of the organization’s survey forms. ++ A description of the accreditation survey review process and the accreditation status decision-making process, including the process for addressing identified deficiencies with the accreditation requirements, and the procedures used to monitor the correction of deficiencies found during an accreditation survey. ++ Procedures for coordinating surveys with another accrediting organization (when the organization does not accredit all modalities) provided by an applicant for accreditation which the supplier provided. ++ Comprehensive information about the individuals who perform evaluations for the accreditation organization, including all of the following information: E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM 26JAN1 WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2010 / Notices —Detailed information about the size and composition of accreditation teams for each category of advanced medical imaging service supplier accredited. —The number of professional and technical staff that are available for survey. —The education, current employment and experience requirements surveyors must meet. —The content and length of any orientation program. —The frequency and types of in-service training provided to survey personnel. —The evaluation systems used to monitor the performance of individual surveyors and survey teams. —Policies and procedures regarding an individual’s participation in the survey or accreditation decision process of any organization with which the individual is professionally or financially affiliated. ++ Policies and procedures used when an organization has a dispute regarding survey findings or an adverse decision. • A description of the organization’s data management and analysis capabilities in support of its surveys and accreditation decisions, including the kinds of reports, tables, and other displays generated by that system. • The organization’s procedures for investigating and responding to complaints against accredited facilities, including policies and procedures regarding coordination of these activities with relevant licensing bodies and CMS. • A description of the organization’s policies and procedures for withholding or removal of accreditation status for facilities that fail to meet the organization’s accreditation standards and other actions taken by the organization in response to noncompliance with its accreditation criteria. These policies and procedures must include notifying CMS of facilities that fail to meet the requirements of the accrediting organization as required by CMS. • The information submitted for notification of these organizations include— ++ A list of all accredited suppliers that the accrediting organization has accredited to include the type and category of accreditation currently held by each supplier, and the expiration date of each supplier’s current accreditation; and ++ A list of all accreditation surveys scheduled to be performed by the organization. VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:10 Jan 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 • The accreditation organization must also submit the following supporting documentation: ++ A written presentation that demonstrates the organization’s ability to furnish us with electronic data in ASCII comparable code. ++ A resource analysis that demonstrates that the organization’s staffing, funding, and other resources are adequate to perform the required surveys and related activities. + A statement acknowledging that, as a condition for approval the organization will agree to the following: —Provide a statement agreeing to notify us, in writing, of any supplier that had its accreditation revoked, withdrawn, revised, or any other remedial or adverse action taken against it by the accreditation organization within 30 calendar days of any such action taken. —Notify all accredited suppliers within 10 calendar days of our withdrawal of the organization’s approval of designation authority. —Notify us, in writing, at least 30 calendar days in advance of the effective date of any proposed changes in accreditation requirements. —Permit its surveyors to serve as witnesses if we take an adverse action based on accreditation findings. —Notify us, in writing, within 2 calendar days of a deficiency identified in any accreditation entity where the deficiency poses an immediate jeopardy to the supplier’s beneficiaries or a hazard to the general public. —Provide, on an annual basis, summary data specified by us that relates to the past years’ accreditations and trends. —Attest that the organization will not perform any accreditation surveys of Medicare participating suppliers with which it has a financial relationship with or interest. For further information regarding the application requirements see the November 25, 2009 (74 FR 62189) and November 30, 2009 (74 FR 62579) notices. The three national accreditation organizations that have applied for approval provided us with demonstrated evidence of their ability to accredit the categories of advanced diagnostic imaging services as defined in sections 1834(e)(1)(B) and 1848 (b)(4)(B) of the Act. Therefore, we are initially approving the following designated accreditation organizations to accredit suppliers furnishing the TC of all advanced imaging modalities (that is, computerized tomography, nuclear medicine, positron emission PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4089 tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging) on or after January 1, 2010: (1) American College of Radiology (ACR); (2) the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC); and (3) The Joint Commission (TJC). Authority: Section 1834(e) of the Act. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.774, MedicareSupplementary Medical Insurance Program) Dated: January 20, 2010. Charlene Frizzera, Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. [FR Doc. 2010–1457 Filed 1–22–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4120–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Respiratory Integrative Biology and Translational Research Study Section, February 4, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to February 5, 2010, 12 p.m., Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20814 which was published in the Federal Register on January 8, 2010, 75 FR 1066–1067. The meeting will be held February 3, 2010, to February 4, 2010. The meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public. Dated: January 15, 2010. Jennifer Spaeth, Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. [FR Doc. 2010–1404 Filed 1–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Neurobiology of Motivated Behavior Study Section, February 4, 2010, 8 a.m. to February 5, 2010, 5 p.m., Bahia Resort Hotel, 998 West Mission Bay Drive, San Diego, CA, 92109 which was published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on January 8, 2010, 75 FR 1066–1067. The meeting will be held at the Catamaran Resort Hotel and Spa, 3999 Mission Boulevard, San Diego, CA 92109. The meeting dates and time E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM 26JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4088-4089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1457]



[[Page 4088]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

[CMS-6023-N2]


Medicare Program; Approval of Independent Accrediting 
Organizations To Participate in the Advanced Diagnostic Imaging 
Supplier Accreditation Program

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces our approval of the following three 
national accreditation organizations to accredit suppliers seeking to 
furnish the technical component (TC) of advanced diagnostic imaging 
services under the Medicare program: the American College of Radiology 
(ACR); the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC); and The Joint 
Commission (TJC).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: August Nemec, (410) 786-0612.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    Section 135(a) of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and 
Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) added section 1834(e) of the Social 
Security Act (the Act) that requires the Secretary to designate 
organizations in order to accredit suppliers furnishing the technical 
component (TC) of advanced diagnostic imaging service and establish 
procedures to ensure that the criteria used by an accreditation 
organization is specific to each imaging modality. Section 
1834(e)(1)(B) of the Act defines advanced diagnostic imaging services 
as--

    (i) Diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, 
and nuclear medicine-including positron emission tomography; and
    (ii) Such other diagnostic imaging services, including services 
described in section 1848(b)(4)(B) (excluding x-ray, ultrasound, and 
fluoroscopy), as specified by the Secretary in consultation with 
physician specialty organizations and other stakeholders.

    Section 1848(b)(4)(B) of the Act defines imaging services as 
``imaging and computer-assisted imaging services, including x-ray, 
ultrasound (including echocardiography), nuclear medicine (including 
positron emission tomography), magnetic resonance imaging, computed 
tomography, and fluoroscopy, but excluding diagnostic and screening 
mammography. Suppliers, including physicians, non-physician 
practitioners and physician and non-physician organizations, of the TC 
of advanced diagnostic imaging services for which payment is made under 
the fee schedule established under section 1848(b) of the Act, must 
become accredited by a designated accreditation organization designated 
by the Secretary beginning January 1, 2012.

II. Application Requirements, Review, and Approval

    The application requirements for accrediting organizations were 
finalized in the Physician Fee Schedule final rule published on 
November 25, 2009 (74 FR 61738) and set forth as application criteria 
in a November 25, 2009 Federal Register notice (74 FR 62189), as 
corrected in the November 30, 2009 correction notice (74 FR 62579).
    We received three applications from our solicitation of accrediting 
organizations. An internal professional panel reviewed and compared the 
standards contained in the applications with our requirements in 42 CFR 
414.68. Accordingly, to be considered for approval as a designated 
accreditation organization, each of accreditation organization had to 
furnish the following information specified in 42 CFR 414.l68:
     A list of the categories of advanced diagnostic imaging 
services for which the organization is requesting approval.
     A description of the accrediting organization's duration 
of accreditation (annual, biennual, and triennial), to include a 
summary of activities that occur at each cycle.
     A detailed description of how the organization's 
accreditation criteria satisfy the statutory standards at section 
1834(e)(3) of the Act, including the following:
    ++ Qualifications of medical personnel who are not physicians and 
who furnish the TC of advanced diagnostic imaging services.
    ++ Qualifications and responsibilities of medical directors and 
supervising physicians, such as training in advanced diagnostic imaging 
services in a residency program, expertise obtained through experience 
or continuing medical education courses.
    ++ Procedures to ensure the safety of persons who furnish the TC of 
advanced diagnostic imaging services and individuals to whom such 
services are furnished.
    ++ Procedures to ensure the reliability, clarity, and accuracy of 
the technical quality of diagnostic images produced by the supplier.
    ++ Procedures to assist the beneficiary in obtaining the 
beneficiary's imaging records on request.
    ++ Procedures to notify CMS of any changes to the modalities 
subsequent to the organization's accreditation decision.
     An agreement to conform accreditation requirements to any 
changes in Medicare statutory requirements authorized by 1834(e) of the 
Act.
     An agreement to maintain or adopt standards that are equal 
to, or more stringent than, those of Medicare.
     Information that demonstrates the accreditation 
organization's knowledge and experience in the advanced diagnostic 
imaging arena.
     A plan for reducing the burden and cost of accreditation 
to small and rural suppliers--
    ++ The organization's proposed fees for accreditation for each 
modality in which the organization intends to offer accreditation; and
    ++ Any specific documentation requirements and attestations 
requested by CMS as a condition of designation.
     A detailed description of the organization's survey 
process, to include the following:
    ++ Type and frequency of the surveys performed.
    ++ The ability of the organization to conduct timely reviews of 
accreditation applications, to include a projection of the 
organization's national capacity for processing new applications before 
the January 1, 2012 accreditation deadline.
    ++ Description of the organization's audit procedures, including 
random site visits; site audits or other strategies for ensuring 
suppliers accredited by the organization maintain compliance throughout 
the period of accreditation.
    ++ Procedures for performing unannounced site surveys.
    ++ Copies of the organization's survey forms.
    ++ A description of the accreditation survey review process and the 
accreditation status decision-making process, including the process for 
addressing identified deficiencies with the accreditation requirements, 
and the procedures used to monitor the correction of deficiencies found 
during an accreditation survey.
    ++ Procedures for coordinating surveys with another accrediting 
organization (when the organization does not accredit all modalities) 
provided by an applicant for accreditation which the supplier provided.
    ++ Comprehensive information about the individuals who perform 
evaluations for the accreditation organization, including all of the 
following information:


[[Page 4089]]


--Detailed information about the size and composition of accreditation 
teams for each category of advanced medical imaging service supplier 
accredited.
--The number of professional and technical staff that are available for 
survey.
--The education, current employment and experience requirements 
surveyors must meet.
--The content and length of any orientation program.
--The frequency and types of in-service training provided to survey 
personnel.
--The evaluation systems used to monitor the performance of individual 
surveyors and survey teams.
--Policies and procedures regarding an individual's participation in 
the survey or accreditation decision process of any organization with 
which the individual is professionally or financially affiliated.

    ++ Policies and procedures used when an organization has a dispute 
regarding survey findings or an adverse decision.
     A description of the organization's data management and 
analysis capabilities in support of its surveys and accreditation 
decisions, including the kinds of reports, tables, and other displays 
generated by that system.
     The organization's procedures for investigating and 
responding to complaints against accredited facilities, including 
policies and procedures regarding coordination of these activities with 
relevant licensing bodies and CMS.
     A description of the organization's policies and 
procedures for withholding or removal of accreditation status for 
facilities that fail to meet the organization's accreditation standards 
and other actions taken by the organization in response to 
noncompliance with its accreditation criteria. These policies and 
procedures must include notifying CMS of facilities that fail to meet 
the requirements of the accrediting organization as required by CMS.
     The information submitted for notification of these 
organizations include--
    ++ A list of all accredited suppliers that the accrediting 
organization has accredited to include the type and category of 
accreditation currently held by each supplier, and the expiration date 
of each supplier's current accreditation; and
    ++ A list of all accreditation surveys scheduled to be performed by 
the organization.
     The accreditation organization must also submit the 
following supporting documentation:
    ++ A written presentation that demonstrates the organization's 
ability to furnish us with electronic data in ASCII comparable code.
    ++ A resource analysis that demonstrates that the organization's 
staffing, funding, and other resources are adequate to perform the 
required surveys and related activities.
    + A statement acknowledging that, as a condition for approval the 
organization will agree to the following:

--Provide a statement agreeing to notify us, in writing, of any 
supplier that had its accreditation revoked, withdrawn, revised, or any 
other remedial or adverse action taken against it by the accreditation 
organization within 30 calendar days of any such action taken.
--Notify all accredited suppliers within 10 calendar days of our 
withdrawal of the organization's approval of designation authority.
--Notify us, in writing, at least 30 calendar days in advance of the 
effective date of any proposed changes in accreditation requirements.
--Permit its surveyors to serve as witnesses if we take an adverse 
action based on accreditation findings.
--Notify us, in writing, within 2 calendar days of a deficiency 
identified in any accreditation entity where the deficiency poses an 
immediate jeopardy to the supplier's beneficiaries or a hazard to the 
general public.
--Provide, on an annual basis, summary data specified by us that 
relates to the past years' accreditations and trends.
--Attest that the organization will not perform any accreditation 
surveys of Medicare participating suppliers with which it has a 
financial relationship with or interest. For further information 
regarding the application requirements see the November 25, 2009 (74 FR 
62189) and November 30, 2009 (74 FR 62579) notices.

    The three national accreditation organizations that have applied 
for approval provided us with demonstrated evidence of their ability to 
accredit the categories of advanced diagnostic imaging services as 
defined in sections 1834(e)(1)(B) and 1848 (b)(4)(B) of the Act. 
Therefore, we are initially approving the following designated 
accreditation organizations to accredit suppliers furnishing the TC of 
all advanced imaging modalities (that is, computerized tomography, 
nuclear medicine, positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance 
imaging) on or after January 1, 2010: (1) American College of Radiology 
(ACR); (2) the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC); and (3) 
The Joint Commission (TJC).

    Authority: Section 1834(e) of the Act.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.774, 
Medicare-Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)

    Dated: January 20, 2010.
Charlene Frizzera,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-1457 Filed 1-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.