Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Montana; Revisions to the Administrative Rules of Montana, 3993-3996 [2010-1386]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
International Money Transfer Service
[Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at
non-UPU rates)
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Ancillary Services
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Certificate of Mailing
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Registered Mail
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Return Receipt
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Restricted Delivery
[Reserved for Product Description]
International Insurance
[Reserved for Product Description]
Negotiated Service Agreements
[Reserved for Group Description]
Domestic
[Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound International
[Reserved for Group Description]
Part C—Glossary of Terms and Conditions [Reserved]
Part D—Country Price Lists for International Mail [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2010–1452 Filed 1–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2008–0307; FRL–8968–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Montana; Revisions to the
Administrative Rules of Montana
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
EPA is taking direct final
action approving State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
State of Montana on November 1, 2006
and November 20, 2007. The revisions
are to the Administrative Rules of
Montana; they include minor editorial
and grammatical changes, updates to the
citations and references to federal and
state laws and regulations, other minor
changes to conform to federal
regulations, and updates to links to
sources of information. This action is
being taken under section 110 of the
Clean Air Act.
DATES: This rule is effective on March
29, 2010 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse comment by
February 25, 2010. If adverse comment
is received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:55 Jan 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2008–0307, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: dolan.kathy@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Director, Air Program,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129.
• Hand Delivery: Director, Air
Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129. Such deliveries
are only accepted Monday through
Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2008–
0307. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3993
General Information of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Dolan, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. 303–312–6142,
dolan.kathy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Summary of SIP Revisions
III. EPA’s Review of the State of Montana’s
November 1, 2006 and November 20,
2007 Submittals
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA
mean or refer to the Clean Air Act,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our
mean or refer to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to
State Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words State or Montana
mean the State of Montana, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
I. General Information
A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through https://
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
3994
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
a. Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
b. Follow directions—The agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
c. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
d. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
e. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
f. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
g. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
h. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Summary of SIP Revisions
A. On November 1, 2006 the State of
Montana submitted formal revisions to
its State Implementation Plan (SIP)
(hereafter, the ‘‘2006 SIP revisions’’). The
2006 SIP revisions contain amendments
to the following sections of the
Administrative Rules of Montana
(ARM): 17.8.101, 17.8.102, 17.8.103,
17.8.302, 17.8.744, 17.8.767, 17.8.801,
17.8.802, 17.8.818, 17.8.902, 17.8.1002,
17.8.1701, 17.8.1702, 17.8.1703,
17.8.1704, 17.8.1705, 17.8.1710,
17.8.1711, 17.8.1712, and 17.8.1713.
B. On November 20, 2007 the State of
Montana submitted formal revisions to
its State Implementation Plan (SIP)
(hereafter, the ‘‘2007 SIP revisions’’). The
2007 SIP revisions contain amendments
to the following sections of the ARM:
17.8.102, 17.8.103, 17.8.302(1)(d),
17.8.602, 17.8.767 with the exception of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:55 Jan 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
subsection (1)(c), 17.8.801, 17.8.802
with the exception of subsection (1)(d),
17.8.818, 17.8.901, 17.8.902 with the
exception of subsection (1)(a), 17.8.1002
with the exception of subsection (1)(a),
17.8.1007, 17.8.1102, and 17.8.1402.
III. EPA’s Review of the State of
Montana’s November 1, 2006 and
November 20, 2007 Submittals
A. 2006 SIP Revisions
A number of the 2006 SIP revisions
are strictly administrative; they make
minor editorial and grammatical
changes, update the citations and
references to federal and state laws and
regulations, and update links to sources
of information. The following are the
2006 rule revisions that fall in this
category: ARM sections 17.8.101,
17.8.102, and 17.8.103. All of the
revisions are approvable. However, the
2007 revisions supersede the 2006
revisions to ARM sections 17.8.102 and
17.8.103. Therefore, in this action we
are approving ARM section 17.8.101
from the 2006 SIP revisions, but not
17.8.102 and 103. We discuss ARM
sections 17.8.102 and 103 further in the
section below that addresses the 2007
SIP revisions.
The 2006 SIP revisions include
changes to ARM sections 17.8.801 and
17.8.818. These changes are approvable.
The revision to 17.8.801 adds the
pollutant Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S), at 10
tons per year (tpy), to the table
‘‘Pollutant and Emissions Rate’’ within
the definition of ‘‘Significant’’ at ARM
17.8.801(27). This provision defines
pollutant significance levels within
Montana’s prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) regulations, and the
addition of H2S at 10 tpy is consistent
with EPA’s PSD regulations. See 40 CFR
51.166(b)(23). The revision to 17.8.818
adds ‘‘hydrogen sulfide (H2S)—0.2 μg/
m3, one hour average’’ at
17.8.818(7)(a)(ix). This establishes an air
quality impact level below which the
State may exempt a proposed PSD major
stationary source or major modification
from certain monitoring requirements.
This too is consistent with EPA’s PSD
regulations. See 40 CFR 51.166(i)(5).
The State made additional changes to
ARM sections 17.8.801 and 17.8.818 as
part of the 2007 SIP revisions. We
discuss these changes below.
The EPA is not taking action on the
2006 revisions to ARM sections
17.8.302, 17.8.767, 17.8.802, 17.8.902,
and 17.8.1002. These revisions reference
EPA’s Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR).
Because the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the D.C. Circuit vacated CAMR on
February 8, 2008 (see New Jersey v. EPA,
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
517 F.3d 574), EPA will not act on these
revisions.
We are not taking action on the
revisions to ARM sections 17.8.1701,
17.8.1702, 17.8.1703, 17.8.1704,
17.8.1705, 17.8.1710, 17.8.1711,
17.8.1712, 17.8.1713, and 17.8.744,
which establish a system of registration
of oil and gas well facilities and provide
for the exclusion of eligible facilities
from Montana air quality permitting
requirements. These revisions will be
addressed in a future action.
B. 2007 SIP Revisions
A number of the 2007 SIP revisions
are strictly administrative; they make
minor editorial and grammatical
changes, update the citations and
references to federal and state laws and
regulations, and update links to sources
of information. The following are the
2007 rule revisions that fall in this
category: ARM sections 17.8.102,
17.8.103, 17.8.302(1)(d), 17.8.602,
17.8.801, 17.8.818, 17.8.901, 17.8.1007,
and 17.8.1102. All of the revisions are
approvable. As noted above, the 2007
revisions to ARM sections 17.8.102 and
103 supersede the 2006 revisions to
these rules. Therefore, EPA is approving
the 2007 revisions. As indicated, both
the 2006 and 2007 revisions to ARM
sections 17.8.801 and 17.8.818 are
approvable. The 2006 revisions are
substantive; the 2007 revisions are
administrative. EPA is approving both
revisions but is only incorporating by
reference the later version of the rules,
which reflect both the 2006 and 2007
revisions.
The EPA is not taking action on the
2007 revisions to ARM sections
17.8.767, 17.8.802, 17.8.902, and
17.8.1002. These revisions reference
EPA’s Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR).
Because the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the D.C. Circuit vacated CAMR on
February 8, 2008 (see New Jersey v. EPA,
517 F.3d 574), EPA will not act on these
revisions.
We are not taking action on the
revision to ARM section 17.8.1402. The
State has indicated that this revision
may be repealed; therefore, action will
not be taken at this time.
IV. Final Action
The EPA is approving revisions that
the State submitted on November 1,
2006. The Montana Board of
Environmental Review adopted these
revisions on July 21, 2006 and they
became effective on August 11, 2006.
The EPA is approving the 2006
revisions to ARM sections 17.8.101,
17.8.801, and 17.8.818. The EPA is not
taking action on the 2006 revisions to
ARM sections 17.8.302, 17.8.744,
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
17.8.767, 17.8.802, 17.8.902, 17.8.1002,
17.8.1701, 17.8.1702, 17.8.1703,
17.8.1704, 17.8.1705, 17.8.1710,
17.8.1711, 17.8.1712, and 17.8.1713.
The EPA is approving revisions that
the State submitted on November 20,
2007. The Montana Board of
Environmental Review adopted these
amendments on September 28, 2007 and
they became effective on October 26,
2007. The EPA is approving the 2007
revisions to ARM sections 17.8.102,
17.8.103, 17.8.302(1)(d), 17.8.602,
17.8.801, 17.8.818, 17.8.901, 17.8.1007,
and 17.8.1102. The EPA is not taking
action on the 2007 revisions to ARM
sections 17.8.767, 17.8.802, 17.8.902,
17.8.1002, and 17.8.1402.
EPA is publishing this rule without
prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse
comments; we are merely approving
administrative and other minor changes
to Montana’s air rules. However, in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s
Federal Register publication, EPA is
publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
SIP revisions if adverse comments are
filed. This rule will be effective March
29, 2010 without further notice unless
the Agency receives adverse comments
by February 25, 2010. If the EPA
receives adverse comments, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect. EPA
will address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
State law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:55 Jan 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
State law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under State law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by State law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a State rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it approves a State rule
implementing a Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3995
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by March 29, 2010.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 25, 2009.
Andrew M. Gaydosh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as
follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
3996
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart BB—Montana
2. Section 52.1370 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(68) to read as
follows:
Credit for Emissions and Air Quality
Offsets; and, 17.8.1102, Incorporation by
Reference; all effective October 26,
2007.
[FR Doc. 2010–1386 Filed 1–25–10; 8:45 am]
■
§ 52.1370
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(68) Revisions to the State
Implementation plan which were
submitted by the State of Montana on
November 1, 2006 and November 20,
2007. The revisions are to the
Administrative Rules of Montana; they
make minor editorial and grammatical
changes, update the citations and
references to federal and state laws and
regulations, make other minor changes
to conform to federal regulations, and
update links to sources of information.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Administrative Rules of Montana
(ARM) section 17.8.101, Definitions;
effective August 11, 2006.
(B) Administrative Rules of Montana
(ARM) sections: 17.8.102, Incorporation
by Reference—Publication Dates;
17.8.103, Incorporation by Reference
and Availability of Referenced
Documents; 17.8.302(1)(d),
Incorporation by Reference; 17.8.602,
Incorporation by Reference; 17.8.801,
Definitions; 17.8.818, Review of Major
Stationary Sources and Major
Modifications—Source Applicability
and Exemptions; 17.8.901, Definitions;
17.8.1007, Baseline for Determining
Local agency
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0475; FRL–9104–7]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, San Joaquin
Valley Air Pollution Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
EPA is finalizing a limited
approval and limited disapproval of
revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Air
Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD or
District) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This action
was proposed in the Federal Register on
July 17, 2009 and concerns volatile
organic compound (VOC) emissions
from steam-enhanced crude oil
production well vents, aerospace
coating operations, and polyester resin
operations. Under authority of the Clean
Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act), this action simultaneously
approves local rules that regulate these
emission sources and directs California
to correct rule deficiencies.
SUMMARY:
Jkt 220001
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0475 for
this action. The index to the docket is
available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4126, law.nicole@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On July 17, 2009 (74 FR 34704), EPA
proposed a limited approval and limited
disapproval of the following rules that
were submitted for incorporation into
the California SIP.
Rule title
4401
4605
4684
We proposed a limited approval
because we determined that these rules
improve the SIP and are largely
consistent with the relevant CAA
requirements. We simultaneously
proposed a limited disapproval because
some rule provisions do not fully satisfy
requirements of section 110 and part D
of the Act. The deficiencies include the
following:
1. Rule 4401 authorizes the District to
grant a waiver from SIP requirements, in
section 6.2.4.
2. SJVAPCD has not adequately
demonstrated that Rule 4605 and Rule
4684 implement RACT.
Our proposed action contains more
information on the basis for this
rulemaking and on our evaluation of the
submittal.
13:55 Jan 25, 2010
40 CFR Part 52
Rule No.
SJVAPCD ..................................
SJVAPCD ..................................
SJVAPCD ..................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on February 25, 2010.
Steam-Enhanced Crude Oil Production Wells ............................
Aerospace Assembly and Component Coating Operations ........
Polyester Resin Operations .........................................................
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. During this
period, we received comments from the
following party.
1. Scott Nester, Director of Planning,
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District; letter dated and
received August 17, 2009.
After the close of the comment period,
we also received comments from the
following party.
2. Sayed Sadredin, Executive
Director/Air Pollution Control Officer of
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District; letter dated August 27,
2009 and received August 31, 2009.
The comments and our responses are
summarized below. Although we are not
obligated to address comments
PO 00000
Adopted
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12/14/06
09/20/07
09/20/07
Submitted
05/08/07
03/07/08
03/07/08
submitted after the close of the
comment period, we are addressing
below both the District’s August 17
comments and those comments in the
District’s August 27 letter that pertain to
the rules we are acting on today.
SJVAPCD Aug. 17 Comment #1: The
District stated that its staff has proposed
to amend Rule 4684 to implement
requirements in the September 2008
Control Techniques Guideline (CTG) for
fiberglass boat manufacturing materials.
EPA Response: We appreciate
SJVAPCD’s efforts to promptly address
RACT requirements for sources covered
by the 2008 CTG for Fiberglass Boat
Manufacturing Materials (2008 CTG),
but we are obligated to act at this time
on the submitted version of Rule 4684.
In addition, we note that Rule 4684
should be revised to address RACT
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 26, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3993-3996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1386]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2008-0307; FRL-8968-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Montana; Revisions to the Administrative Rules of Montana
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Montana
on November 1, 2006 and November 20, 2007. The revisions are to the
Administrative Rules of Montana; they include minor editorial and
grammatical changes, updates to the citations and references to federal
and state laws and regulations, other minor changes to conform to
federal regulations, and updates to links to sources of information.
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
DATES: This rule is effective on March 29, 2010 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comment by February 25, 2010. If adverse
comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct
final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule
will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2008-0307, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: dolan.kathy@epa.gov.
Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please alert the individual listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing comments).
Mail: Director, Air Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202-1129.
Hand Delivery: Director, Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. Such deliveries are only accepted Monday
through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-
2008-0307. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting
comments, go to Section I. General Information of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Program,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to view the hard copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy
of the docket Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Dolan, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. 303-312-6142,
dolan.kathy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Summary of SIP Revisions
III. EPA's Review of the State of Montana's November 1, 2006 and
November 20, 2007 Submittals
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain
words or initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air
Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words State or Montana mean the State of Montana, unless
the context indicates otherwise.
I. General Information
A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
https://regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
[[Page 3994]]
information in a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside
of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the comment that includes
information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain
the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
b. Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
II. Summary of SIP Revisions
A. On November 1, 2006 the State of Montana submitted formal
revisions to its State Implementation Plan (SIP) (hereafter, the ``2006
SIP revisions''). The 2006 SIP revisions contain amendments to the
following sections of the Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM):
17.8.101, 17.8.102, 17.8.103, 17.8.302, 17.8.744, 17.8.767, 17.8.801,
17.8.802, 17.8.818, 17.8.902, 17.8.1002, 17.8.1701, 17.8.1702,
17.8.1703, 17.8.1704, 17.8.1705, 17.8.1710, 17.8.1711, 17.8.1712, and
17.8.1713.
B. On November 20, 2007 the State of Montana submitted formal
revisions to its State Implementation Plan (SIP) (hereafter, the ``2007
SIP revisions''). The 2007 SIP revisions contain amendments to the
following sections of the ARM: 17.8.102, 17.8.103, 17.8.302(1)(d),
17.8.602, 17.8.767 with the exception of subsection (1)(c), 17.8.801,
17.8.802 with the exception of subsection (1)(d), 17.8.818, 17.8.901,
17.8.902 with the exception of subsection (1)(a), 17.8.1002 with the
exception of subsection (1)(a), 17.8.1007, 17.8.1102, and 17.8.1402.
III. EPA's Review of the State of Montana's November 1, 2006 and
November 20, 2007 Submittals
A. 2006 SIP Revisions
A number of the 2006 SIP revisions are strictly administrative;
they make minor editorial and grammatical changes, update the citations
and references to federal and state laws and regulations, and update
links to sources of information. The following are the 2006 rule
revisions that fall in this category: ARM sections 17.8.101, 17.8.102,
and 17.8.103. All of the revisions are approvable. However, the 2007
revisions supersede the 2006 revisions to ARM sections 17.8.102 and
17.8.103. Therefore, in this action we are approving ARM section
17.8.101 from the 2006 SIP revisions, but not 17.8.102 and 103. We
discuss ARM sections 17.8.102 and 103 further in the section below that
addresses the 2007 SIP revisions.
The 2006 SIP revisions include changes to ARM sections 17.8.801 and
17.8.818. These changes are approvable. The revision to 17.8.801 adds
the pollutant Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S), at 10 tons per year
(tpy), to the table ``Pollutant and Emissions Rate'' within the
definition of ``Significant'' at ARM 17.8.801(27). This provision
defines pollutant significance levels within Montana's prevention of
significant deterioration (PSD) regulations, and the addition of
H2S at 10 tpy is consistent with EPA's PSD regulations. See
40 CFR 51.166(b)(23). The revision to 17.8.818 adds ``hydrogen sulfide
(H2S)--0.2 [micro]g/m3, one hour average'' at
17.8.818(7)(a)(ix). This establishes an air quality impact level below
which the State may exempt a proposed PSD major stationary source or
major modification from certain monitoring requirements. This too is
consistent with EPA's PSD regulations. See 40 CFR 51.166(i)(5). The
State made additional changes to ARM sections 17.8.801 and 17.8.818 as
part of the 2007 SIP revisions. We discuss these changes below.
The EPA is not taking action on the 2006 revisions to ARM sections
17.8.302, 17.8.767, 17.8.802, 17.8.902, and 17.8.1002. These revisions
reference EPA's Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR). Because the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated CAMR on February 8, 2008 (see
New Jersey v. EPA, 517 F.3d 574), EPA will not act on these revisions.
We are not taking action on the revisions to ARM sections
17.8.1701, 17.8.1702, 17.8.1703, 17.8.1704, 17.8.1705, 17.8.1710,
17.8.1711, 17.8.1712, 17.8.1713, and 17.8.744, which establish a system
of registration of oil and gas well facilities and provide for the
exclusion of eligible facilities from Montana air quality permitting
requirements. These revisions will be addressed in a future action.
B. 2007 SIP Revisions
A number of the 2007 SIP revisions are strictly administrative;
they make minor editorial and grammatical changes, update the citations
and references to federal and state laws and regulations, and update
links to sources of information. The following are the 2007 rule
revisions that fall in this category: ARM sections 17.8.102, 17.8.103,
17.8.302(1)(d), 17.8.602, 17.8.801, 17.8.818, 17.8.901, 17.8.1007, and
17.8.1102. All of the revisions are approvable. As noted above, the
2007 revisions to ARM sections 17.8.102 and 103 supersede the 2006
revisions to these rules. Therefore, EPA is approving the 2007
revisions. As indicated, both the 2006 and 2007 revisions to ARM
sections 17.8.801 and 17.8.818 are approvable. The 2006 revisions are
substantive; the 2007 revisions are administrative. EPA is approving
both revisions but is only incorporating by reference the later version
of the rules, which reflect both the 2006 and 2007 revisions.
The EPA is not taking action on the 2007 revisions to ARM sections
17.8.767, 17.8.802, 17.8.902, and 17.8.1002. These revisions reference
EPA's Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR). Because the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the D.C. Circuit vacated CAMR on February 8, 2008 (see New Jersey
v. EPA, 517 F.3d 574), EPA will not act on these revisions.
We are not taking action on the revision to ARM section 17.8.1402.
The State has indicated that this revision may be repealed; therefore,
action will not be taken at this time.
IV. Final Action
The EPA is approving revisions that the State submitted on November
1, 2006. The Montana Board of Environmental Review adopted these
revisions on July 21, 2006 and they became effective on August 11,
2006. The EPA is approving the 2006 revisions to ARM sections 17.8.101,
17.8.801, and 17.8.818. The EPA is not taking action on the 2006
revisions to ARM sections 17.8.302, 17.8.744,
[[Page 3995]]
17.8.767, 17.8.802, 17.8.902, 17.8.1002, 17.8.1701, 17.8.1702,
17.8.1703, 17.8.1704, 17.8.1705, 17.8.1710, 17.8.1711, 17.8.1712, and
17.8.1713.
The EPA is approving revisions that the State submitted on November
20, 2007. The Montana Board of Environmental Review adopted these
amendments on September 28, 2007 and they became effective on October
26, 2007. The EPA is approving the 2007 revisions to ARM sections
17.8.102, 17.8.103, 17.8.302(1)(d), 17.8.602, 17.8.801, 17.8.818,
17.8.901, 17.8.1007, and 17.8.1102. The EPA is not taking action on the
2007 revisions to ARM sections 17.8.767, 17.8.802, 17.8.902, 17.8.1002,
and 17.8.1402.
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comments; we are merely approving administrative and other
minor changes to Montana's air rules. However, in the ``Proposed
Rules'' section of today's Federal Register publication, EPA is
publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to
approve the SIP revisions if adverse comments are filed. This rule will
be effective March 29, 2010 without further notice unless the Agency
receives adverse comments by February 25, 2010. If the EPA receives
adverse comments, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. EPA
will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on
the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period
on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this
time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under State law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a State rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a State rule
implementing a Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 29, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed
rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so
that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in
the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 25, 2009.
Andrew M. Gaydosh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 3996]]
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart BB--Montana
0
2. Section 52.1370 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(68) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.1370 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(68) Revisions to the State Implementation plan which were
submitted by the State of Montana on November 1, 2006 and November 20,
2007. The revisions are to the Administrative Rules of Montana; they
make minor editorial and grammatical changes, update the citations and
references to federal and state laws and regulations, make other minor
changes to conform to federal regulations, and update links to sources
of information.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM) section 17.8.101,
Definitions; effective August 11, 2006.
(B) Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM) sections: 17.8.102,
Incorporation by Reference--Publication Dates; 17.8.103, Incorporation
by Reference and Availability of Referenced Documents; 17.8.302(1)(d),
Incorporation by Reference; 17.8.602, Incorporation by Reference;
17.8.801, Definitions; 17.8.818, Review of Major Stationary Sources and
Major Modifications--Source Applicability and Exemptions; 17.8.901,
Definitions; 17.8.1007, Baseline for Determining Credit for Emissions
and Air Quality Offsets; and, 17.8.1102, Incorporation by Reference;
all effective October 26, 2007.
[FR Doc. 2010-1386 Filed 1-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P