Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes, 3658-3660 [2010-1175]

Download as PDF 3658 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules TABLE 1—APPLICABLE PART NUMBERS Equivalent Boeing supplier part numbers Boeing specification part number Sierra engineering Spencer fluid Puritan bennett Hydraflow 60B50059–70 .......................... 60B50059–81 .......................... 60B50059–94 .......................... 60B50059–101 ........................ 60B50059–130 ........................ 835–01–70 .............................. Not applicable ......................... Not applicable ......................... Not applicable ......................... Not applicable ......................... 9513–20S5–18.0 ..................... Not applicable ......................... Not applicable ......................... Not applicable ......................... Not applicable ......................... ZH784–20 ............................... Not applicable ......................... Not applicable ......................... Not applicable ......................... Not applicable ......................... 38001–70 38001–81 38001–94 38001–101 38001–130 Parts Installation DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (h) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a flightcrew or supernumerary oxygen hose with a part number identified in Table 1 of this AD on any airplane. Actions Accomplished According to Previous Issue of Service Bulletin (i) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–35A0034, dated September 2, 1999, are considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions specified in this AD. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (j)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Robert Hettman, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057– 3356; telephone (425) 917–6457; fax (425) 917–6590. Or, e-mail information to 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 8, 2010. Stephen P. Boyd, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 [FR Doc. 2010–1174 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:42 Jan 21, 2010 Jkt 220001 Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2010–0045; Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–085–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747– 400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Model 747 airplanes. This proposed AD would require inspecting to verify the part number of the low-pressure flexhoses of the crew oxygen system installed under the oxygen mask stowage boxes in the flight deck, and replacing the flex-hose with a new nonconductive low-pressure flex-hose if necessary. This proposed AD results from reports of low-pressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen system that burned through due to inadvertent electrical current from a short circuit in the audio select panel. We are proposing this AD to prevent inadvertent electrical current, which can cause the low-pressure flexhoses of the crew oxygen system to melt or burn, causing oxygen system leakage and smoke or fire. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 8, 2010. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: 202–493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124– 2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227– 1221 or 425–227–1152. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hettman, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6457; fax (425) 917–6590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2010–0045; Directorate Identifier E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM 22JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules 2009–NM–085–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion We have received reports of lowpressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen system that burned through due to inadvertent electrical current from a short circuit in the audio select panel on a Model 757 airplane. An electrical current went through the support structure to the flight crew mask stowage box and through the lowpressure oxygen hose. This caused the spring inside the low-pressure oxygen hose to act as an electrical conductor and heat up, causing the hose to burn through. This condition, if not corrected, could result in the lowpressure flex-hose of the crew oxygen system melting or burning, causing oxygen system leakage and smoke or fire. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 Relevant Service Information We have reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin 747–35A2101, Revision 1, dated May 15, 2003. The service bulletin describes procedures for replacing the existing low-pressure flexhoses of the crew oxygen system installed under the oxygen mask stowage boxes in the flight deck with new non-conductive low-pressure flexhoses of the oxygen system. FAA’s Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type designs. This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service information described previously, except as discussed under ‘‘Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin.’’ Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin Although Boeing Service Bulletin 747–35A2101, Revision 1, dated May VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:42 Jan 21, 2010 Jkt 220001 15, 2003, recommends accomplishing the replacement ‘‘at the earliest opportunity when manpower, material and facilities are available,’’ we have determined that this imprecise compliance time would not address the identified unsafe condition in a timely manner. In developing an appropriate compliance time for this proposed AD, we considered not only the manufacturer’s recommendation, but the degree of urgency associated with addressing the subject unsafe condition, the average utilization of the affected fleet, and the time necessary to perform the modifications. In light of all of these factors, we find a compliance time of 36 months for completing the required actions to be warranted, in that it represents an appropriate interval of time for affected airplanes to continue to operate without compromising safety. This difference has been coordinated with Boeing. Other Rulemaking The oxygen mask installations on certain Model 737, 757, and 767 airplanes are almost identical to those on the affected Model 747 airplanes. Therefore, all of these airplanes may be subject to the identified unsafe condition. We are considering similar rulemaking related to the identified unsafe condition for certain Model 737, 757, and 767 airplanes. 3659 because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of compliance in the AD Docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 211 airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed AD to the U.S. operators to be $16,880, or $80 per product. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority § 39.13 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD: The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 2010–0045; Directorate Identifier 2009– NM–085–AD. Comments Due Date (a) We must receive comments by March 8, 2010. Affected ADs (b) None. Applicability (c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747– 100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, certificated in any category; line numbers 1 through 1229 inclusive. E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM 22JAP1 3660 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules Subject (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35: Oxygen. Unsafe Condition (e) This AD results from reports of lowpressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen system that burned through due to inadvertent electrical current from a short circuit in the audio select panel. The Federal Aviation Administration is issuing this AD to prevent inadvertent electrical current, which can cause the low-pressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen system to melt or burn, resulting in oxygen system leakage and smoke or fire. Compliance (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. Inspection (g) Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, do an inspection to determine whether any low-pressure flexhose of the crew oxygen system installed under the oxygen mask stowage box in the flight deck has a part number identified in Table 1 of this AD. A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the part number of the lowpressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen system can be conclusively determined from that review. (1) For any hose having a part number identified in Table 1 of this AD, before further flight, replace the hose with a new or serviceable part, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–35A2101, Revision 1, dated May 15, 2003. (2) For any hose not having a part number identified in Table 1 of this AD, no further action is required by this paragraph. TABLE 1—APPLICABLE PART NUMBERS Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 8, 2010. Stephen P. Boyd, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2010–1175 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:42 Jan 21, 2010 [Docket No. FAA–2010–0030; Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–135–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 757 Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). Equivalent hydraflow part number Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 • Fax: 202–493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124– 2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227– 1221 or 425–227–1152. Examining the AD Docket 14 CFR Part 39 SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Model 757 airplanes. This proposed AD 60B50059–19 ......................... 38001–19 would require repetitive inspections for 60B50059–20 ......................... 38001–20 corrosion and cracking in the front spar 60B50059–60 ......................... 38001–60 lower chord at the four fastener 60B50059–62 ......................... 38001–62 locations common to the side link 60B50059–69 ......................... 38001–69 support fitting at wing station (WS) 292, 60B50059–70 ......................... 38001–70 and corrective actions if necessary. This 60B50059–81 ......................... 38001–81 proposed AD results from reports that 60B50059–94 ......................... 38001–94 60B50059–95 ......................... 38001–95 several operators have found cracking in 60B50059–101 ....................... 38001–101 the front spar lower chord at the four 60B50059–129 ....................... 38001–129 fastener locations common to the side link support fitting at WS 292. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct Parts Installation such corrosion and cracking, which, if (h) As of the effective date of this AD, no not corrected, could grow and result in person may install a crew oxygen hose with structural failure of the spar. a part number identified in Table 1 of this AD on any airplane. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 8, 2010. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: (i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 instructions for submitting comments. Boeing specification part number erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Robert Hettman, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057– 3356; telephone (425) 917–6457; fax (425) 917–6590. Or, e-mail information to 9–ANM– Seattle-ACO–AMOC–Requests@faa.gov. (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. Sfmt 4702 You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Hartman, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6432; fax (425) 917–6590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2010–0030; Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–135–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM 22JAP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3658-3660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1175]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0045; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-085-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-
100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 
747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 
certain Model 747 airplanes. This proposed AD would require inspecting 
to verify the part number of the low-pressure flex-hoses of the crew 
oxygen system installed under the oxygen mask stowage boxes in the 
flight deck, and replacing the flex-hose with a new non-conductive low-
pressure flex-hose if necessary. This proposed AD results from reports 
of low-pressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen system that burned 
through due to inadvertent electrical current from a short circuit in 
the audio select panel. We are proposing this AD to prevent inadvertent 
electrical current, which can cause the low-pressure flex-hoses of the 
crew oxygen system to melt or burn, causing oxygen system leakage and 
smoke or fire.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 8, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; 
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the 
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information 
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 
425-227-1152.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory 
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street 
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the 
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly 
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hettman, Aerospace Engineer, 
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle 
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6457; fax (425) 917-6590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address 
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0045; 
Directorate Identifier

[[Page 3659]]

2009-NM-085-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically 
invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and 
energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments 
received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of 
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received reports of low-pressure flex-hoses of the crew 
oxygen system that burned through due to inadvertent electrical current 
from a short circuit in the audio select panel on a Model 757 airplane. 
An electrical current went through the support structure to the flight 
crew mask stowage box and through the low-pressure oxygen hose. This 
caused the spring inside the low-pressure oxygen hose to act as an 
electrical conductor and heat up, causing the hose to burn through. 
This condition, if not corrected, could result in the low-pressure 
flex-hose of the crew oxygen system melting or burning, causing oxygen 
system leakage and smoke or fire.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin 747-35A2101, Revision 1, 
dated May 15, 2003. The service bulletin describes procedures for 
replacing the existing low-pressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen 
system installed under the oxygen mask stowage boxes in the flight deck 
with new non-conductive low-pressure flex-hoses of the oxygen system.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant 
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is 
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type 
designs. This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions 
specified in the service information described previously, except as 
discussed under ``Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service 
Bulletin.''

Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin

    Although Boeing Service Bulletin 747-35A2101, Revision 1, dated May 
15, 2003, recommends accomplishing the replacement ``at the earliest 
opportunity when manpower, material and facilities are available,'' we 
have determined that this imprecise compliance time would not address 
the identified unsafe condition in a timely manner. In developing an 
appropriate compliance time for this proposed AD, we considered not 
only the manufacturer's recommendation, but the degree of urgency 
associated with addressing the subject unsafe condition, the average 
utilization of the affected fleet, and the time necessary to perform 
the modifications. In light of all of these factors, we find a 
compliance time of 36 months for completing the required actions to be 
warranted, in that it represents an appropriate interval of time for 
affected airplanes to continue to operate without compromising safety. 
This difference has been coordinated with Boeing.

Other Rulemaking

    The oxygen mask installations on certain Model 737, 757, and 767 
airplanes are almost identical to those on the affected Model 747 
airplanes. Therefore, all of these airplanes may be subject to the 
identified unsafe condition. We are considering similar rulemaking 
related to the identified unsafe condition for certain Model 737, 757, 
and 767 airplanes.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 211 airplanes of 
U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour 
per product to comply with this proposed AD. The average labor rate is 
$80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this 
proposed AD to the U.S. operators to be $16,880, or $80 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866,
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of 
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2010-0045; Directorate Identifier 
2009-NM-085-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by March 8, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-
100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 
747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, certificated 
in any category; line numbers 1 through 1229 inclusive.

[[Page 3660]]

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35: Oxygen.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from reports of low-pressure flex-hoses of 
the crew oxygen system that burned through due to inadvertent 
electrical current from a short circuit in the audio select panel. 
The Federal Aviation Administration is issuing this AD to prevent 
inadvertent electrical current, which can cause the low-pressure 
flex-hoses of the crew oxygen system to melt or burn, resulting in 
oxygen system leakage and smoke or fire.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this 
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the 
actions have already been done.

Inspection

    (g) Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, do an 
inspection to determine whether any low-pressure flex-hose of the 
crew oxygen system installed under the oxygen mask stowage box in 
the flight deck has a part number identified in Table 1 of this AD. 
A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of 
this inspection if the part number of the low-pressure flex-hoses of 
the crew oxygen system can be conclusively determined from that 
review.
    (1) For any hose having a part number identified in Table 1 of 
this AD, before further flight, replace the hose with a new or 
serviceable part, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions 
of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-35A2101, Revision 1, dated May 15, 
2003.
    (2) For any hose not having a part number identified in Table 1 
of this AD, no further action is required by this paragraph.

                    Table 1--Applicable Part Numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Equivalent
             Boeing specification  part number                hydraflow
                                                             part number
------------------------------------------------------------------------
60B50059-19...............................................      38001-19
60B50059-20...............................................      38001-20
60B50059-60...............................................      38001-60
60B50059-62...............................................      38001-62
60B50059-69...............................................      38001-69
60B50059-70...............................................      38001-70
60B50059-81...............................................      38001-81
60B50059-94...............................................      38001-94
60B50059-95...............................................      38001-95
60B50059-101..............................................     38001-101
60B50059-129..............................................     38001-129
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Parts Installation

    (h) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a 
crew oxygen hose with a part number identified in Table 1 of this AD 
on any airplane.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to 
ATTN: Robert Hettman, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and 
Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind 
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-
6457; fax (425) 917-6590. Or, e-mail information to 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different 
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. 
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC 
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or 
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a 
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. 
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 8, 2010.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-1175 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.