Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model AB139 and AW139 Helicopters, 3615-3617 [2010-1159]
Download as PDF
3615
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 14
Friday, January 22, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1125; Directorate
Identifier 2009–SW–50–AD; Amendment 39–
16129; AD 2009–19–51]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta
S.p.A. (Agusta) Model AB139 and
AW139 Helicopters
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: This document publishes in
the Federal Register an amendment
adopting Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2009–19–51, which was sent previously
to all known U.S. owners and operators
of the Agusta Model AB139 and AW139
helicopters by individual letters. This
AD requires inspecting the tail panels
for debonding and, if the debonding
area exceeds a certain limit, repairing
the tailboom. This AD results from a
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) AD issued by the
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community. The MCAI AD states that
while taxiing, the tailboom of a Model
AW139 helicopter bent and collapsed.
Also, EASA had received previous
reports of evidence of debonding on
some tailboom panels of the specified
Agusta model helicopters. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in failure of a tailboom and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: Effective on February 8, 2010, to
all persons except those persons to
whom it was made immediately
effective by Emergency AD 2009–19–51,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:41 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
issued on September 16, 2009, which
contained the requirements of this
amendment.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules
Docket must be received on or before
March 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
AD:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this AD from Agusta, Via
Giovanni Agusta, 520 21017 Cascina
Costa di Samarate (VA), Italy, telephone
39 0331–229111, fax 39 0331–229605/
222595, or at https://
customersupport.agusta.com/
technical_advice.php.
Examining the Docket: You may
examine the docket that contains the
AD, any comments, and other
information on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov, or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket
Operations office (telephone (800) 647–
5527) is located in Room W12–140 on
the ground floor of the West Building at
the street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Sharon
Miles, ASW–111, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Regulations and Guidance Group, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137, telephone (817) 222–5122, fax
(817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 16, 2009, we issued
Emergency AD 2009–19–51 to all
known U.S. owners and operators of the
Agusta Model AB139 and AW139
helicopters by individual letters. The
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
AD requires inspecting the tail panels
for debonding and, if the debonding
area exceeds a certain limit repairing the
tailboom. That action was prompted by
the tailboom of a Model AW139
helicopter bending and collapsing
during taxiing. That condition, if not
corrected, could result in failure of a
tailboom and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter.
The FAA has reviewed Agusta Alert
Bollettino Tecnico (ABT) Nos. 139–193
and 139–194, both dated September 3,
2009. These ABTs refer to the aircraft
maintenance publications for inspecting
the affected tail panels for signs of
debonding. If you find evidence of
debonding, the ABTs also advise you to
contact the manufacturer for repair
instructions.
EASA has issued AD No. 2009–0198–
E, dated September 4, 2009, which
supersedes EASA AD No. 2008–0157,
dated August 13, 2008, to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified model
helicopters. The latest EASA AD
requires repetitive inspections of the
tailboom panels at closer intervals. In
case of debonding, the EASA AD
requires you to mark the debonded areas
for identification, contact the
manufacturer for instructions, and
follow their corrective actions.
These helicopter models have been
approved by the aviation authority of
Italy and are approved for operation in
the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with Italy, EASA,
their technical agent, has notified us of
the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI AD. We are issuing this AD
because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other helicopters of
these same type designs.
Since the unsafe condition described
is likely to exist or develop on other
Agusta Model AB139 and AW139
helicopters of these same type designs,
the FAA issued Emergency AD 2009–
19–51 to prevent failure of a tailboom
and subsequent loss of control of a
helicopter. The short compliance time
involved is required because the
previously described critical unsafe
condition can adversely affect the
structural integrity and the
controllability of the helicopter.
Therefore, inspecting the tail panels for
debonding within 50 hours time-inservice (TIS) for certain serial-numbered
E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM
22JAR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
3616
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
helicopters and within 25 hours TIS or
30 days, whichever occurs first, for
certain other serial-numbered
helicopters and removing the strake if
you find bond separation are required
before further flight. Also, this AD
requires measuring the debonded area
and repairing the tailboom, before
further flight, if the debonded area
exceeds the required measurement
before further flight. Therefore, this AD
must be issued immediately.
Since it was found that immediate
corrective action was required, notice
and opportunity for prior public
comment thereon were impracticable
and contrary to the public interest, and
good cause existed to make the AD
effective immediately by individual
letters issued on September 16, 2009, to
all known U.S. owners and operators of
Agusta Model AB139 and AW139
helicopters. These conditions still exist,
and the AD is hereby published in the
Federal Register as an amendment to 14
CFR 39.13 to make it effective to all
persons with two minor changes. The
Emergency AD contained two paragraph
(e)’s; therefore, we have changed the
Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC)
Code paragraph to paragraph (f) of this
AD. Also, the aluminum hammer part
number (P/N) was incorrectly stated as
P/N 109–3101–58–1 in the Emergency
AD and should be P/N 109–3101–58–2.
Hammer, P/N 109–3101–58–1, is a steel
hammer. We have made that correction
in this AD. However, for purposes of
this AD, the use of either the steel
hammer or the aluminum hammer is
acceptable. We have also changed Note
1 of the AD to clarify that the ABTs are
guidance for accomplishing the AD
requirements. We have determined that
these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor
increase the scope of the AD.
This AD differs from the MCAI AD in
that we refer to flight hours as hours
TIS. Also, we do not require you to
contact the manufacturer nor do we
reference their ABT, which references
the maintenance manual. We have also
inserted the inspection requirements
and the debonding limits in this AD
which are consistent with those in the
maintenance manual.
We estimate that this AD will affect
about 7 helicopters. We also estimate
that it will take about 2 work-hours per
helicopter to inspect the tail panels for
debonding. The average labor rate is $80
per work-hour. The parts cost is
minimal. Based on these figures, we
estimate that the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators will be $1,120, assuming no
tailboom needs repair.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:41 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements that affect flight safety and
was not preceded by notice and an
opportunity for public comment;
however, we invite you to submit any
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under ADDRESSES.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2009–1125;
Directorate Identifier 2009–SW–50–AD’’
at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the AD. We will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend the AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this AD. Using the
search function of our docket Web site,
you can find and read the comments to
any of our dockets, including the name
of the individual who sent the
comment. You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78).
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Therefore, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
product(s) identified in this rulemaking
action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2009–19–51 Agusta S.p.A.: Amendment 39–
16129; Docket No. FAA–2009–1125;
Directorate Identifier 2009–SW–50–AD.
Applicability
This AD applies to Model AB139 and
AW139 helicopters, certificated in any
category.
Compliance
Required as indicated.
To prevent failure of a tailboom and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter,
do the following:
(a) Using the large end of the head of an
aluminum hammer, part number 109–3101–
58–2 (GF–06–00), tap inspect the full skin
surface of the tailboom between Stations
8700 and 11019.5 for a hollow or dull sound,
which will indicate a bond separation or
debond area. Do the inspections at the
following intervals:
(1) For helicopters, serial number (S/N)
31006, 31020, 31022, 31042, 31136, 31157,
and 31248, within 5-hours time-in-service
(TIS), unless done previously, and thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 50-hours TIS.
Note 1: Agusta Alert Bollettino Tecnico
Nos. 139–193, and 139–194, both dated
September 3, 2009 (ABTs), contain guidance
on accomplishing the required actions of this
AD. Following the Compliance Instructions
in the ABTs accomplishes the requirements
of this AD.
(2) For all helicopters, except S/N 31006,
31020, 31022, 31042, 31136, 31157, and
E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM
22JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
31248, within 25-hours TIS or 30 days,
whichever occurs first, unless done
previously, and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 50-hours TIS.
(b) If you find any bond separation, use the
small end of the head of the hammer to
identify the edges of the debonded area. If the
debonded area goes beyond the strake,
remove the strake. Using a marking pen or
chalk, mark the edge of the debonded area.
(1) Measure the surface area of each
debonded area, the distance between the
edges of the debonded areas, and the distance
of the edge of each debonded area from the
edge of the bond joint.
(2) Before further flight, repair the tailboom
using FAA-approved data and procedures if:
(i) The debonded area exceeds 320 mm2
(0.5 in2),
(ii) The distance between the edges of any
two debonded areas is less than or equal to
three times the largest debond dimension of
the two debonded areas measured on a line
between the centers of the two debonded
areas, or
(iii) The edge of any debonded area is less
than 3 mm (0.118 in) from the edge of the
panel bond joint.
(c) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Contact the Manager, Safety
Management Group, ATTN: DOT/FAA
Southwest Region, Sharon Miles, ASW–111,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Regulations and Guidance
Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth,
Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222–5122, fax
(817) 222–5961, for information about
previously approved alternative methods of
compliance.
(d) Special flight permits will not be
issued.
(e) Copies of the applicable service
information may be obtained from Agusta,
Via Giovanni Agusta, 520 21017 Cascina
Costa di Samarate (VA), Italy, telephone 39
0331–229111, fax 39 0331–229605/222595,
or at https://customersupport.agusta.com/
technical_advice.php.
(f) The JASC Code for this part is Code
5302: Rotorcraft Tailboom.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed
in European Aviation Safety Agency AD No.
2009–0198–E, dated September 4, 2009.
(g) This amendment becomes effective on
February 8, 2010, to all persons except those
persons to whom it was made immediately
effective by Emergency AD 2009–19–51,
issued September 16, 2009, which contained
the requirements of this amendment.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 11,
2010.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–1159 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:41 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 55
[EPA–R02–OAR–2009–0680; FRL–9103–3]
Outer Continental Shelf Air
Regulations Update To Include New
Jersey State Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing the update
of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Air
Regulations proposed in the Federal
Register on October 2, 2009.
Requirements applying to OCS sources
located within 25 miles of States’
seaward boundaries must be
promulgated and updated periodically
to remain consistent with the
requirements of the corresponding
onshore area (COA), as mandated by the
Clean Air Act (CAA). The portion of the
OCS air regulations that is being
updated pertains to the requirements for
OCS sources in the State of New Jersey.
The intended effect of approving the
OCS requirements for the State of New
Jersey is to regulate emissions from OCS
sources in accordance with the
requirements onshore. The requirements
discussed below are incorporated by
reference into the Code of Federal
Regulations and are listed in the
appendix to the OCS air regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on February 22, 2010.
This incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in this rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of February 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R02–OAR–2009–0680. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Publicly available docket materials
are available either electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2, 290
Broadway, New York, New York 10007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Riva, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 2, 290 Broadway, New York,
New York 10007; telephone number:
(212) 637–4074; e-mail address:
riva.steven@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Public Comment and EPA Response
III. EPA Action
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3617
IV. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination
With Indian Tribal Government
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
J. Congressional Review Act
K. Petitions for Judicial Review
I. Background Information
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
On September 4, 1992, EPA
promulgated 40 CFR part 55,1 which
established requirements to control air
pollution from OCS sources in order to
attain and maintain Federal and state
ambient air quality standards (AAQS)
and to comply with the provisions of
Part C of title I of the CAA. 40 CFR part
55 applies to all OCS sources offshore
of the states except those located in the
Gulf of Mexico west of 87.5 degrees
longitude.
On October 2, 2009 (74 FR 50939),
EPA proposed to approve requirements
into the OCS Air Regulations pertaining
to the State of New Jersey. EPA has
evaluated the proposed regulations to
ensure that they are rationally related to
the attainment or maintenance of
Federal or state ambient air quality
standards or Part C of title I of the Act,
that they are not designed expressly to
prevent exploration and development of
the OCS and that they are applicable to
OCS sources. 40 CFR 55.1. EPA has also
evaluated the rules to ensure that they
are not arbitrary or capricious. 40 CFR
55.12(e). In addition, EPA has excluded
administrative or procedural rules.
Section 328(a) of the CAA requires
that EPA establish requirements to
control air pollution from OCS sources
located within 25 miles of States’
seaward boundaries that are the same as
onshore requirements. To comply with
this statutory mandate, EPA must
incorporate applicable rules in effect for
onshore sources into 40 CFR part 55.
This limits EPA’s flexibility in deciding
which requirements will be
incorporated into 40 CFR part 55 and
prevents EPA from making substantive
1 The reader may refer to the Proposed
Rulemaking, December 5, 1991 (56 FR 63774), and
the preamble to the final rule promulgated
September 4, 1992 (57 FR 40792) for further
background and information on the OCS
regulations.
E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM
22JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3615-3617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1159]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 3615]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-1125; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-50-AD;
Amendment 39-16129; AD 2009-19-51]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model AB139 and
AW139 Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document publishes in the Federal Register an amendment
adopting Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2009-19-51, which was sent
previously to all known U.S. owners and operators of the Agusta Model
AB139 and AW139 helicopters by individual letters. This AD requires
inspecting the tail panels for debonding and, if the debonding area
exceeds a certain limit, repairing the tailboom. This AD results from a
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) AD issued by the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European Community. The MCAI AD states
that while taxiing, the tailboom of a Model AW139 helicopter bent and
collapsed. Also, EASA had received previous reports of evidence of
debonding on some tailboom panels of the specified Agusta model
helicopters. This condition, if not corrected, could result in failure
of a tailboom and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: Effective on February 8, 2010, to all persons except those
persons to whom it was made immediately effective by Emergency AD 2009-
19-51, issued on September 16, 2009, which contained the requirements
of this amendment.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before March 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this AD:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information identified in this AD from
Agusta, Via Giovanni Agusta, 520 21017 Cascina Costa di Samarate (VA),
Italy, telephone 39 0331-229111, fax 39 0331-229605/222595, or at
https://customersupport.agusta.com/technical_advice.php.
Examining the Docket: You may examine the docket that contains the
AD, any comments, and other information on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov, or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
located in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the West Building at the
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Sharon
Miles, ASW-111, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Regulations and Guidance Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137, telephone (817) 222-5122, fax (817) 222-5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 16, 2009, we issued Emergency
AD 2009-19-51 to all known U.S. owners and operators of the Agusta
Model AB139 and AW139 helicopters by individual letters. The AD
requires inspecting the tail panels for debonding and, if the debonding
area exceeds a certain limit repairing the tailboom. That action was
prompted by the tailboom of a Model AW139 helicopter bending and
collapsing during taxiing. That condition, if not corrected, could
result in failure of a tailboom and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
The FAA has reviewed Agusta Alert Bollettino Tecnico (ABT) Nos.
139-193 and 139-194, both dated September 3, 2009. These ABTs refer to
the aircraft maintenance publications for inspecting the affected tail
panels for signs of debonding. If you find evidence of debonding, the
ABTs also advise you to contact the manufacturer for repair
instructions.
EASA has issued AD No. 2009-0198-E, dated September 4, 2009, which
supersedes EASA AD No. 2008-0157, dated August 13, 2008, to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified model helicopters. The latest EASA
AD requires repetitive inspections of the tailboom panels at closer
intervals. In case of debonding, the EASA AD requires you to mark the
debonded areas for identification, contact the manufacturer for
instructions, and follow their corrective actions.
These helicopter models have been approved by the aviation
authority of Italy and are approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with Italy, EASA, their technical
agent, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
AD. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists and is
likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of these same type
designs.
Since the unsafe condition described is likely to exist or develop
on other Agusta Model AB139 and AW139 helicopters of these same type
designs, the FAA issued Emergency AD 2009-19-51 to prevent failure of a
tailboom and subsequent loss of control of a helicopter. The short
compliance time involved is required because the previously described
critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the structural integrity
and the controllability of the helicopter. Therefore, inspecting the
tail panels for debonding within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS) for
certain serial-numbered
[[Page 3616]]
helicopters and within 25 hours TIS or 30 days, whichever occurs first,
for certain other serial-numbered helicopters and removing the strake
if you find bond separation are required before further flight. Also,
this AD requires measuring the debonded area and repairing the
tailboom, before further flight, if the debonded area exceeds the
required measurement before further flight. Therefore, this AD must be
issued immediately.
Since it was found that immediate corrective action was required,
notice and opportunity for prior public comment thereon were
impracticable and contrary to the public interest, and good cause
existed to make the AD effective immediately by individual letters
issued on September 16, 2009, to all known U.S. owners and operators of
Agusta Model AB139 and AW139 helicopters. These conditions still exist,
and the AD is hereby published in the Federal Register as an amendment
to 14 CFR 39.13 to make it effective to all persons with two minor
changes. The Emergency AD contained two paragraph (e)'s; therefore, we
have changed the Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC) Code paragraph
to paragraph (f) of this AD. Also, the aluminum hammer part number (P/
N) was incorrectly stated as P/N 109-3101-58-1 in the Emergency AD and
should be P/N 109-3101-58-2. Hammer, P/N 109-3101-58-1, is a steel
hammer. We have made that correction in this AD. However, for purposes
of this AD, the use of either the steel hammer or the aluminum hammer
is acceptable. We have also changed Note 1 of the AD to clarify that
the ABTs are guidance for accomplishing the AD requirements. We have
determined that these changes will neither increase the economic burden
on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
This AD differs from the MCAI AD in that we refer to flight hours
as hours TIS. Also, we do not require you to contact the manufacturer
nor do we reference their ABT, which references the maintenance manual.
We have also inserted the inspection requirements and the debonding
limits in this AD which are consistent with those in the maintenance
manual.
We estimate that this AD will affect about 7 helicopters. We also
estimate that it will take about 2 work-hours per helicopter to inspect
the tail panels for debonding. The average labor rate is $80 per work-
hour. The parts cost is minimal. Based on these figures, we estimate
that the cost of this AD on U.S. operators will be $1,120, assuming no
tailboom needs repair.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements that affect
flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for
public comment; however, we invite you to submit any written data,
views, or arguments regarding this AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-1125; Directorate
Identifier 2009-SW-50-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend the AD in light of
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of our
docket Web site, you can find and read the comments to any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment. You
may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Therefore, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on product(s) identified in this
rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2009-19-51 Agusta S.p.A.: Amendment 39-16129; Docket No. FAA-2009-
1125; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-50-AD.
Applicability
This AD applies to Model AB139 and AW139 helicopters,
certificated in any category.
Compliance
Required as indicated.
To prevent failure of a tailboom and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter, do the following:
(a) Using the large end of the head of an aluminum hammer, part
number 109-3101-58-2 (GF-06-00), tap inspect the full skin surface
of the tailboom between Stations 8700 and 11019.5 for a hollow or
dull sound, which will indicate a bond separation or debond area. Do
the inspections at the following intervals:
(1) For helicopters, serial number (S/N) 31006, 31020, 31022,
31042, 31136, 31157, and 31248, within 5-hours time-in-service
(TIS), unless done previously, and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 50-hours TIS.
Note 1: Agusta Alert Bollettino Tecnico Nos. 139-193, and 139-
194, both dated September 3, 2009 (ABTs), contain guidance on
accomplishing the required actions of this AD. Following the
Compliance Instructions in the ABTs accomplishes the requirements of
this AD.
(2) For all helicopters, except S/N 31006, 31020, 31022, 31042,
31136, 31157, and
[[Page 3617]]
31248, within 25-hours TIS or 30 days, whichever occurs first,
unless done previously, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed
50-hours TIS.
(b) If you find any bond separation, use the small end of the
head of the hammer to identify the edges of the debonded area. If
the debonded area goes beyond the strake, remove the strake. Using a
marking pen or chalk, mark the edge of the debonded area.
(1) Measure the surface area of each debonded area, the distance
between the edges of the debonded areas, and the distance of the
edge of each debonded area from the edge of the bond joint.
(2) Before further flight, repair the tailboom using FAA-
approved data and procedures if:
(i) The debonded area exceeds 320 mm\2\ (0.5 in\2\),
(ii) The distance between the edges of any two debonded areas is
less than or equal to three times the largest debond dimension of
the two debonded areas measured on a line between the centers of the
two debonded areas, or
(iii) The edge of any debonded area is less than 3 mm (0.118 in)
from the edge of the panel bond joint.
(c) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Contact the Manager, Safety Management Group, ATTN: DOT/FAA
Southwest Region, Sharon Miles, ASW-111, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Guidance Group, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222-5122, fax (817)
222-5961, for information about previously approved alternative
methods of compliance.
(d) Special flight permits will not be issued.
(e) Copies of the applicable service information may be obtained
from Agusta, Via Giovanni Agusta, 520 21017 Cascina Costa di
Samarate (VA), Italy, telephone 39 0331-229111, fax 39 0331-229605/
222595, or at https://customersupport.agusta.com/technical_advice.php.
(f) The JASC Code for this part is Code 5302: Rotorcraft
Tailboom.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed in European
Aviation Safety Agency AD No. 2009-0198-E, dated September 4, 2009.
(g) This amendment becomes effective on February 8, 2010, to all
persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately
effective by Emergency AD 2009-19-51, issued September 16, 2009,
which contained the requirements of this amendment.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 11, 2010.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-1159 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P