Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 757 Airplanes, 3660-3662 [2010-1137]
Download as PDF
3660
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 35: Oxygen.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of lowpressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen
system that burned through due to
inadvertent electrical current from a short
circuit in the audio select panel. The Federal
Aviation Administration is issuing this AD to
prevent inadvertent electrical current, which
can cause the low-pressure flex-hoses of the
crew oxygen system to melt or burn, resulting
in oxygen system leakage and smoke or fire.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection
(g) Within 36 months after the effective
date of this AD, do an inspection to
determine whether any low-pressure flexhose of the crew oxygen system installed
under the oxygen mask stowage box in the
flight deck has a part number identified in
Table 1 of this AD. A review of airplane
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of
this inspection if the part number of the lowpressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen
system can be conclusively determined from
that review.
(1) For any hose having a part number
identified in Table 1 of this AD, before
further flight, replace the hose with a new or
serviceable part, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–35A2101, Revision 1,
dated May 15, 2003.
(2) For any hose not having a part number
identified in Table 1 of this AD, no further
action is required by this paragraph.
TABLE 1—APPLICABLE PART NUMBERS
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
8, 2010.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–1175 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:42 Jan 21, 2010
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0030; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–135–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 757 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
Equivalent
hydraflow
part number
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221 or 425–227–1152.
Examining the AD Docket
14 CFR Part 39
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Model 757 airplanes. This proposed AD
60B50059–19 .........................
38001–19 would require repetitive inspections for
60B50059–20 .........................
38001–20 corrosion and cracking in the front spar
60B50059–60 .........................
38001–60 lower chord at the four fastener
60B50059–62 .........................
38001–62 locations common to the side link
60B50059–69 .........................
38001–69 support fitting at wing station (WS) 292,
60B50059–70 .........................
38001–70 and corrective actions if necessary. This
60B50059–81 .........................
38001–81
proposed AD results from reports that
60B50059–94 .........................
38001–94
60B50059–95 .........................
38001–95 several operators have found cracking in
60B50059–101 .......................
38001–101 the front spar lower chord at the four
60B50059–129 .......................
38001–129 fastener locations common to the side
link support fitting at WS 292. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct
Parts Installation
such corrosion and cracking, which, if
(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no
not corrected, could grow and result in
person may install a crew oxygen hose with
structural failure of the spar.
a part number identified in Table 1 of this
AD on any airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 8, 2010.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
instructions for submitting comments.
Boeing specification
part number
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Robert Hettman, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin
Safety and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 917–6457; fax (425)
917–6590. Or, e-mail information to 9–ANM–
Seattle-ACO–AMOC–Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
Sfmt 4702
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Hartman, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6432; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2010–0030; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–135–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received reports that, over
the past 7 years, several operators have
found cracking in the front spar lower
chord at the four fastener locations
common to the side link support fitting
at WS 292. This area is not covered by
the normal maintenance activities. The
length of the cracks ranged from 0.025
inch to 0.080 inch on airplanes that had
accumulated from 13,100 to 29,209 total
flight cycles. The cracks were repaired
by oversizing the holes and installing
freeze plugs. Such cracking, if not
detected and corrected, could grow and
result in structural failure of the spar.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 757–57–
0065, dated May 14, 2009. This service
bulletin describes procedures for
repetitive ultrasonic and general visual
inspections for cracking and corrosion
of the front spar lower chord at the four
fastener locations common to the side
link support fitting at WS 292. For
airplanes on which any cracking or
corrosion is found, Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 757–57–
0065, dated May 14, 2009, specifies
contacting Boeing for additional repair
instructions and doing the repair.
The compliance time for doing the
inspections is at the latest of the
following times, as applicable:
• Before 37,500 total flight cycles or
20 years since the date of issuance of the
original standard certificate of
airworthiness, whichever occurs first.
• Within 3,000 flight cycles after the
date of the service bulletin.
• Within 12,000 flight cycles after the
incorporation of the modification
requirements of AD 2004–12–07,
Amendment 39–13666 (69 FR 33561,
June 16, 2004), or AD 2003–18–05,
Amendment 39–13296 (68 FR 53496,
September 11, 2003).
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all relevant information and
determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design. This proposed AD would
require accomplishing the actions
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:42 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
specified in the service information
described previously, except as
discussed under ‘‘Differences Between
the Proposed AD and Service Bulletin.’’
Explanation of Compliance Times
We have provided two compliance
times in paragraph (g) of this AD.
Paragraph (g)(1) of this AD requires a
compliance time specified in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 757–57–
0065, dated May 14, 2009. Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 757–
57–0065, dated May 14, 2009, contains
a compliance time that refers to
modifications required by AD 2003–18–
05, Amendment 39–13296 (68 FR
53496, September 11, 2003); and AD
2004–12–07, Amendment 39–13666 (69
FR 33561, June 16, 2004). We anticipate
superseding these ADs. As a result, we
have provided an additional compliance
time in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD
which is contingent upon having done
the modifications required by those two
ADs.
Differences Between the Proposed AD
and Service Bulletin
Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 757–57–0065, dated May 14,
2009, specifies to contact the
manufacturer for instructions on how to
repair certain conditions, but this
proposed AD would require repairing
those conditions in one of the following
ways:
• Using a method that we approve; or
• Using data that meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and
that have been approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that
we have authorized to make those
findings.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 668 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 6 work-hours per airplane to
comply with this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this proposed AD to the U.S.
operators to be $320,640 per inspection
cycle, or $480 per airplane, per
inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3661
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2010–0030; Directorate Identifier 2009–
NM–135–AD.
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
3662
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by March 8,
2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 757–200, –200PF, –200CB,
and –300 series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57: Wings.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of cracking
at the front spar lower chord at the four
fastener locations common to the side link
support fitting at wing station (WS) 292. The
Federal Aviation Administration is issuing
this AD to detect and correct such cracking
and corrosion, which, if not corrected, could
grow and result in structural failure of the
spar.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Inspect for Cracking and Corrosion
(g) At the later of the times in paragraphs
(g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, do ultrasonic and
general visual inspections for cracking and
corrosion of the front spar lower chord at the
four fastener locations common to the side
link support fitting at WS 292, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
757–57–0065, dated May 14, 2009. Where
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
757–57–0065, dated May 14, 2009, specifies
a compliance time ‘‘after the date on this
service bulletin,’’ this AD requires
compliance at the specified time after the
effective date of this AD. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 12,000 flight cycles.
(1) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 757–57–
0065, dated May 14, 2009.
(2) Within 12,000 flight cycles after doing
the modification of the nacelle and wing
structure in accordance with Boeing Service
Bulletin 757–54–0034 or Boeing Service
Bulletin 757–54–0035.
(h) If any cracking or corrosion is found
during any inspection required by this AD:
Before further flight, repair the cracking or
corrosion using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Chris
Hartman, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:42 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 917–6432; fax (425)
917–6590. Or, e-mail information to 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
January 14, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–1137 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0046; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–086–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 737–300, –400, –500,
–600, –700, and –800 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model 737–300, –400, –500, –600, –700,
and –800 series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require inspecting
to verify the part number of the lowpressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen
system installed under the oxygen mask
stowage boxes located within the flight
deck, and replacing the flex-hose with a
new non-conductive low-pressure flexhose if necessary. This proposed AD
results from reports of low-pressure
flex-hoses of the crew oxygen system
that burned through due to inadvertent
electrical current from a short circuit in
the audio select panel. We are proposing
this AD to prevent inadvertent electrical
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
current, which can cause the lowpressure flex-hoses of the crew oxygen
system to melt or burn, causing oxygen
system leakage and smoke or fire.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221 or 425–227–1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Hettman, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA,
Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 917–6457; fax (425)
917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3660-3662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1137]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-0030; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-135-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 757 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Model 757 airplanes. This proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections for corrosion and cracking in the front spar lower chord at
the four fastener locations common to the side link support fitting at
wing station (WS) 292, and corrective actions if necessary. This
proposed AD results from reports that several operators have found
cracking in the front spar lower chord at the four fastener locations
common to the side link support fitting at WS 292. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct such corrosion and cracking, which, if
not corrected, could grow and result in structural failure of the spar.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or
425-227-1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Hartman, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6432; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0030;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-135-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this
[[Page 3661]]
proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received reports that, over the past 7 years, several
operators have found cracking in the front spar lower chord at the four
fastener locations common to the side link support fitting at WS 292.
This area is not covered by the normal maintenance activities. The
length of the cracks ranged from 0.025 inch to 0.080 inch on airplanes
that had accumulated from 13,100 to 29,209 total flight cycles. The
cracks were repaired by oversizing the holes and installing freeze
plugs. Such cracking, if not detected and corrected, could grow and
result in structural failure of the spar.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-57-
0065, dated May 14, 2009. This service bulletin describes procedures
for repetitive ultrasonic and general visual inspections for cracking
and corrosion of the front spar lower chord at the four fastener
locations common to the side link support fitting at WS 292. For
airplanes on which any cracking or corrosion is found, Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 757-57-0065, dated May 14, 2009, specifies
contacting Boeing for additional repair instructions and doing the
repair.
The compliance time for doing the inspections is at the latest of
the following times, as applicable:
Before 37,500 total flight cycles or 20 years since the
date of issuance of the original standard certificate of airworthiness,
whichever occurs first.
Within 3,000 flight cycles after the date of the service
bulletin.
Within 12,000 flight cycles after the incorporation of the
modification requirements of AD 2004-12-07, Amendment 39-13666 (69 FR
33561, June 16, 2004), or AD 2003-18-05, Amendment 39-13296 (68 FR
53496, September 11, 2003).
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described previously, except as discussed under
``Differences Between the Proposed AD and Service Bulletin.''
Explanation of Compliance Times
We have provided two compliance times in paragraph (g) of this AD.
Paragraph (g)(1) of this AD requires a compliance time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 757-57-0065, dated May 14, 2009. Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 757-57-0065, dated May 14, 2009, contains a compliance
time that refers to modifications required by AD 2003-18-05, Amendment
39-13296 (68 FR 53496, September 11, 2003); and AD 2004-12-07,
Amendment 39-13666 (69 FR 33561, June 16, 2004). We anticipate
superseding these ADs. As a result, we have provided an additional
compliance time in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD which is contingent upon
having done the modifications required by those two ADs.
Differences Between the Proposed AD and Service Bulletin
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-57-0065, dated May
14, 2009, specifies to contact the manufacturer for instructions on how
to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD would require
repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
Using a method that we approve; or
Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that we have
authorized to make those findings.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 668 airplanes of
U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about 6 work-hours
per airplane to comply with this proposed AD. The average labor rate is
$80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
proposed AD to the U.S. operators to be $320,640 per inspection cycle,
or $480 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2010-0030; Directorate Identifier
2009-NM-135-AD.
[[Page 3662]]
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by March 8, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -
200PF, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of cracking at the front spar
lower chord at the four fastener locations common to the side link
support fitting at wing station (WS) 292. The Federal Aviation
Administration is issuing this AD to detect and correct such
cracking and corrosion, which, if not corrected, could grow and
result in structural failure of the spar.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspect for Cracking and Corrosion
(g) At the later of the times in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of
this AD, do ultrasonic and general visual inspections for cracking
and corrosion of the front spar lower chord at the four fastener
locations common to the side link support fitting at WS 292, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 757-57-0065, dated May 14, 2009. Where
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-57-0065, dated May 14,
2009, specifies a compliance time ``after the date on this service
bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance at the specified time after
the effective date of this AD. Repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 12,000 flight cycles.
(1) At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-57-
0065, dated May 14, 2009.
(2) Within 12,000 flight cycles after doing the modification of
the nacelle and wing structure in accordance with Boeing Service
Bulletin 757-54-0034 or Boeing Service Bulletin 757-54-0035.
(h) If any cracking or corrosion is found during any inspection
required by this AD: Before further flight, repair the cracking or
corrosion using a method approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Chris Hartman, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S,
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6432; fax
(425) 917-6590. Or, e-mail information to 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 14, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-1137 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P