Preserved Mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia, 3756-3757 [2010-1136]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
3756
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and Record of Decision. Because of the
significance of paleontological,
botanical, hydrological, and cultural
resources present within the CTA study
area and the need for additional public
input, the BLM is preparing a
Supplemental EIS. The BLM proposes to
establish a final boundary for the CTA.
This decision was not made in the 2004
Record of Decision. The CTA study area
is located in the northern portion of the
Las Vegas Valley. A defined final
boundary is needed to ensure protection
of sensitive resources, including fossils,
cultural resources, the natural
functioning of the wash, and endemic
plants on public lands available for
disposal within the CTA study area, in
accordance with applicable laws.
Six alternatives for boundaries are
analyzed, ranging from approximately
13,000 acres to less than 1,500 acres.
Alternative A, at 12,953 acres, includes
the fossil formation, sensitive cultural
and plant resources, active wash, the
adjacent alluvial fan, and a one mile
resource protection zone around
northern and eastern boundaries of the
Las Vegas Paiute reservation.
Alternative B, at 11,008 acres, includes
the fossil formation, sensitive cultural
and plant resources, active wash, and
the adjacent alluvial fan. Alternative B
is the BLM’s Preferred Alternative.
Alternative C, at 6,362 acres, includes
the fossil formation, sensitive cultural
and plant resources, active wash, and a
portion of the adjacent alluvial fan.
Alternative D, at 5,301 acres, includes
most of the fossil formation, the
sensitive cultural and rare plant
resources, and the active wash.
Alternative E, at 3,314 acres, includes
some of the fossil formation, the
sensitive cultural and rare plant
resources, and part of the active wash.
The No Action alternative, at 1,448
acres, includes the Tule Spring cultural
site and the 300-acre Eglington Preserve.
Scoping of the project occurred from
June 6 to August 20, 2007, and was
extended to September 4, 2007. A total
of 1,183 individuals submitted
comments. Comments received
pertained to a variety of broad
categories, including alternatives,
boundaries, management, and physical/
natural resources. Additional
stakeholder involvement has been
achieved through the BLM’s newsletters
that provided updates on the
Supplemental EIS process.
The Draft Supplemental EIS addresses
the following issues identified during
scoping: NEPA process (consultation/
coordination, proposal description,
alternatives, and connected actions/
cumulative impacts); social resources
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:43 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
(cultural resources, visual resources,
noise, land use, recreation,
transportation, and socioeconomic
resources); and physical/natural
resources (botanical resources, water
resources, paleontological resources,
and geologic/soil resources).
Maps of the CTA study area and the
alternatives being analyzed in the
Supplemental EIS are available at the
BLM Las Vegas Field Office. Please note
that public comments and information
submitted including names, street
addresses, and e-mail addresses of
persons who submit comments will be
available for public review and
disclosure at the above address during
regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.),
Monday through Friday, except
holidays.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6 and 1506.10.
Angie Lara,
Associate District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2010–976 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Indian Gaming Commission
The National Environmental Policy Act
Procedures Manual
AGENCY: National Indian Gaming
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of reopening of comment
period.
SUMMARY: This notice reopens the
period for comments on the Draft NEPA
Procedures Manual published in the
Federal Register on December 4, 2009
(74 FR 63765, 74 FR 63787).
DATES: The comment period for the
Draft NEPA Procedures Manual is being
reopened from January 19, 2010, to
March 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Please submit your
comments by only one of the following
means: (1) By mail to: Brad Mehaffy,
National Indian Gaming Commission,
1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100,
Washington, DC 20005; (2) by hand
delivery to: National Indian Gaming
Commission, 1441 L Street, NW., Suite
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9100, Washington, DC 20005; (3) by
facsimile to: (202) 632–7066; (4) by email to: nepa_procedures@nigc.gov; or
(5) online at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bradley Mehaffy, NEPA Compliance
Officer at the National Indian Gaming
Commission: 202–632–7003 or by
facsimile at 303–632–7066 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: In response
to several requests, the Acting Chairman
of the National Indian Gaming
Commission has decided to reopen the
comment period on the Draft NEPA
Procedures Manual for an additional 45
days.
Dated: January 15, 2010.
George T. Skibine,
Acting Chairman, National Indian Gaming
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–1148 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565–01–P
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL
TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–776–779
(Second Review)]
Preserved Mushrooms from Chile,
China, India, and Indonesia
AGENCY: United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of expedited fiveyear reviews concerning the
antidumping duty orders on preserved
mushrooms from Chile, China, India,
and Indonesia.
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of expedited
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on preserved mushrooms
from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury within
a reasonably foreseeable time. For
further information concerning the
conduct of these reviews and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
DATES:
Effective Date: January 4, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Haines (202–205–3200), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On January 4, 2010, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (74
FR 50818, October 1, 2009) for each
review was adequate and that the
respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews will be
placed in the nonpublic record on
February 17, 2010, and made available
to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for these
reviews. A public version will be issued
thereafter, pursuant to section
207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the reviews and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution, and any party other
than an interested party to the reviews,
may file written comments with the
Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the
reviews. Comments are due on or before
February 23, 2010 and may not contain
new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may
submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual
information) pertinent to the review by
February 23, 2010. If comments contain
business proprietary information (BPI),
they must conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3,
and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules.
The Commission’s rules do not
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:43 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules,
as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8,
2002). Even where electronic filing of a
document is permitted, certain
documents must also be filed in paper
form, as specified in II (C) of the
Commission’s Handbook on Electronic
Filing Procedures, 67 Fed. Reg. 68168,
68173 (November 8, 2002).
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the reviews must be
served on all other parties to the reviews
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination.—The Commission has
determined to exercise its authority to
extend the review period by up to 90
days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 15, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–1136 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1121–0311]
Bureau of Justice Statistics; Agency
Information Collection Activities:
Proposed Collection; Comments
Requested
ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Extension of
Existing Collection With Change;
National Inmate Survey.
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted for
‘‘sixty days’’ until March 23, 2010. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3757
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Paige M. Harrison,
Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531
(phone: 202–514–0809).
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of this information
collection:
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of existing collection with
change.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
National Inmate Survey.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection: Paper and Pencil
questionnaires—PAPI M12, PAPI M<12,
PAPI F12, PAPI F<12, SP PAPI M12, SP
PAPI M<12, SP PAPI F12, SP PAPI
F<12; Facility Characteristics survey—
NIS FS. The Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Office of Justice Programs, Department
of Justice is the sponsor for the
collection.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: State, Local, or Tribal
Government. Other: Federal
Government, Business or other forprofit, Not-for-profit institutions. The
work under this clearance will be used
to produce estimates for the incidence
and prevalence of sexual assault within
correctional facilities as required under
the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003
(Pub. L. 108–79).
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3756-3757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1136]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-776-779 (Second Review)]
Preserved Mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of expedited five-year reviews concerning the
antidumping duty orders on preserved mushrooms from Chile, China,
India, and Indonesia.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of
expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation
of the antidumping duty orders on preserved mushrooms from Chile,
China, India, and Indonesia would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For
further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules
of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part
207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: January 4, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Haines (202-205-3200),
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
[[Page 3757]]
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On January 4, 2010, the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution
(74 FR 50818, October 1, 2009) for each review was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission determined that
it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on
February 17, 2010, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will
be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission's rules.
Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution, and any party other than an interested party to the
reviews, may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are
due on or before February 23, 2010 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement
(which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the
review by February 23, 2010. If comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections
201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's
rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036
(November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is
permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as
specified in II (C) of the Commission's Handbook on Electronic Filing
Procedures, 67 Fed. Reg. 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002).
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other
parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Determination.--The Commission has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 15, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-1136 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P