Broadband Technology Opportunities Program, 3792-3820 [2010-1097]
Download as PDF
3792
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
protecting against fraud, waste, and
abuse, contact
btopcompliance@ntia.doc.gov.
Additional information regarding
compliance for BTOP may be obtained
at https://www.broadbandusa.gov/
compliance.htm.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration
[Docket No. 0907141137–0024–06]
RIN 0660–ZA28
Broadband Technology Opportunities
Program
AGENCY: National Telecommunications
and Information Administration (NTIA),
U.S. Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Funds Availability
(NOFA) and solicitation of applications.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
SUMMARY: NTIA announces general
policy and application procedures for
the Broadband Technology
Opportunities Program (BTOP or
Program) that the agency established
pursuant to the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery
Act). BTOP provides grants for
deploying broadband infrastructure in
unserved and underserved areas of the
United States, enhancing broadband
capacity at public computer centers, and
promoting sustainable broadband
adoption projects. In facilitating the
expansion of broadband
communications services and
infrastructure, BTOP advances the
objectives of the Recovery Act to spur
job creation and stimulate long-term
economic growth and opportunity.
DATES: All applications for funding
BTOP projects must be submitted
between February 16, 2010, at 8 a.m.
Eastern Standard Time (EST) and March
15, 2010, at 5 p.m. Eastern Daylight
Time (EDT).
ADDRESSES: The application packages
for electronic submissions will be
available at https://
www.broadbandusa.gov. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for more
details.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general inquiries regarding BTOP or
questions regarding this NOFA, contact
Anthony Wilhelm, Director, BTOP,
Office of Telecommunications and
Information Applications, National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce (DOC), 1401 Constitution
Avenue, NW., HCHB, Room 4887,
Washington, DC 20230; Help Desk email: BroadbandUSA@usda.gov, Help
Desk telephone: 1–877–508–8364.
Additional information regarding BTOP
may be obtained at https://
www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/.
For inquiries regarding BTOP
compliance requirements, including
applicable Federal rules and regulations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Authority: This notice is issued pursuant
to the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009, Pub. L. 111–5, 123 Stat. 115
(2009).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic submissions: Electronic
submissions of applications will allow
for the expeditious review of an
applicant’s proposal consistent with the
goals of the Recovery Act. As a result,
all applicants are required to submit
their applications electronically at
https://applyonline.broadbandusa.gov.
The electronic application system will
provide a date-and-time-stamped
confirmation number that will serve as
proof of submission. Please note that
applications will not be accepted via
paper, facsimile machine transmission,
electronic mail, or other media format.
Applicants, however, may request a
waiver of these filing instructions
pursuant to Section X.N. of this NOFA.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: Broadband
Technology Opportunities Program
(BTOP)—11.557.
Additional Items in Supplementary
Information
I. Overview: Describes the broadband
initiatives in the Recovery Act, the first
round of funding, and an overview of the
next round of funding.
II. Funding Opportunity Description:
Provides a more thorough description of
BTOP and the funding priorities.
III. Definitions: Sets forth the key statutory
terms and other terms used in BTOP.
IV. Award Information: Describes funding
availability, grant terms, as applicable, and
other award information.
V. Eligibility Information and General
Program Requirements: Establishes eligibility
criteria, eligible and ineligible costs, and
general program requirements.
VI. Application and Submission
Information: Provides information regarding
how to apply, application materials, and the
application process.
VII. Application Review Information:
Establishes the evaluation criteria for
application review.
VIII. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates: Identifies the initial
announcement date for certain awards and
provides other information regarding BTOP.
IX. Award Administration Information:
Provides award notice information,
administrative and national policy
requirements, terms and conditions, and
other reporting requirements for award
recipients.
X. Other Information: Sets forth guidance
on funding, compliance with various laws,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
confidentiality, discretionary awards, and
authorized signatures.
I. Overview
A. American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery
Act)
On February 17, 2009, President
Obama signed the Recovery Act into
law.1 The essential goal of the Recovery
Act is to provide a ‘‘direct fiscal boost
to help lift our Nation from the greatest
economic crisis in our lifetimes and lay
the foundation for future growth.’’ 2
Accordingly, the Recovery Act identifies
five overall purposes: To preserve and
create jobs and promote economic
recovery; to assist those most impacted
by the current economic recession; to
provide investments needed to increase
economic efficiency by spurring
technological advances in science and
health; to invest in transportation,
environmental protection, and other
infrastructure that will provide longterm economic benefits; and to stabilize
State and local government budgets.3
The Recovery Act further instructs the
President and the heads of Federal
departments and agencies to manage
and expend Recovery Act funds to
achieve these five purposes,
‘‘commencing expenditures and
activities as quickly as possible
consistent with prudent management.’’ 4
Consistent with the purposes
described above, the Recovery Act
provides the U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service
(RUS) and the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) with $7.2 billion
to expand access to broadband services
in the United States. In so doing, the
Recovery Act recognizes the growing
importance of access to broadband
services to economic development and
to the quality of life of all Americans.
The Recovery Act provides $4.7
billion to NTIA to establish the
Broadband Technology Opportunities
Program (BTOP or Program) and directs
that these funds be awarded by
September 30, 2010. This amount
represents a significant investment to
advance President Obama’s national
broadband strategy. Of these funds, at
least $200 million will be made
available for competitive grants for
1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009, Pub. L. No. 111–5, 123 Stat. 115 (2009)
(Recovery Act).
2 Statement on Signing the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Daily Comp. of Pres.
Doc., 2009 DCPD No. 00088, at 1 (Feb. 17, 2009),
https://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-200900088/
pdf/DCPD-200900088.pdf.
3 Recovery Act sec. 3(a), 123 Stat. at 115–16.
4 See id. Sec. 3(b), 123 Stat. at 116.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
expanding public computer center
capacity; at least $250 million will be
made available for competitive grants
for innovative programs to encourage
sustainable adoption of broadband
services; and up to $350 million will be
made available to fund the State
Broadband Data and Development Grant
Program (Broadband Mapping Program)
authorized by the Broadband Data
Improvement Act.5 The Broadband
Mapping Program is designed to support
the development and maintenance of a
nationwide broadband map for use by
policymakers and consumers.6
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
B. Round One
In response to the first Notice of
Funds Availability (First NOFA), RUS
and NTIA received almost 2,200
applications requesting nearly $28
billion in funding for proposed
broadband projects reaching all States,
five territories, and the District of
Columbia.7 When including about $10.5
billion in matching funds committed by
the applicants, these applications
represent more than $38 billion in
proposed broadband projects. RUS and
NTIA received applications from a
diverse range of parties, including:
State, tribal, and local governments;
nonprofits; industry; small businesses;
community anchor institutions such as
libraries, universities, community
colleges, and hospitals; public safety
organizations; and other entities in
rural, suburban, and urban areas. Parties
submitted more than 830 applications
jointly to RUS’s Broadband Initiatives
Program (BIP) and NTIA’s BTOP,
requesting nearly $12.8 billion in
infrastructure funding. NTIA received
an additional 260 infrastructure
applications that sought only BTOP
funding, requesting more than $5.4
billion in grants for broadband
infrastructure projects in unserved and
underserved areas. Parties submitted
more than 360 applications to NTIA
requesting more than $1.9 billion in
grants from BTOP for public computer
center projects. In addition, parties filed
more than 320 applications with NTIA
requesting nearly $2.5 billion in grants
from BTOP for projects that promote
sustainable demand for broadband
services.
On December 17, 2009, NTIA
announced the first set of awards out of
the $1.6 billion that was allocated for
5 Pub. L. 110–385, 122 Stat. 4096 (to be codified
at 47 U.S.C. 1301 et seq.).
6 See State Broadband Data and Development
Grant Program, Notice of Funds Availability and
Solicitation of Applications, 74 FR 32545 (July 8,
2009).
7 Notice of Funds Availability and Solicitation of
Applications, 74 FR 33104 (July 9, 2009).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
the first round of funding. These
awards, as well as additional awards
announced by Secretary Locke on
January 13, 2010, totaled approximately
$137 million for investments in ten
broadband projects benefitting ten
States.8 Of these awards, $119 million
was dedicated for Middle Mile projects;
$15.9 million for Public Computer
Center projects; and $2.4 million for
Sustainable Broadband Adoption
projects. Additional awards will be
announced on a rolling basis.
C. Round Two
1. Funding Process
The purpose of this NOFA is to
describe the availability of BTOP funds
for the second round of funding and set
forth the application requirements for
those entities wishing to participate in
the Program. Applicants are permitted
to apply to one or more of the project
categories. Each application will be
screened for initial eligibility. Those
eligible applications that satisfy the
statutory purposes and funding
priorities will be prioritized and
evaluated against objective evaluation
criteria to determine whether an award
may be merited. Applications that
satisfy the BTOP priorities and score
highly when evaluated against the
objective evaluation criteria will
advance to the due diligence stage of
review, where NTIA may request
additional information and adjustments
to the proposal. From this pool of
applications, NTIA will select awardees
based on the selection factors. NTIA
anticipates completing this round of
funding as quickly as possible to
maximize the stimulative effect of the
Recovery Act. NTIA also is committed
to transparency and fairness in the
award process and will require rigorous
reporting to ensure prudent stewardship
of taxpayer funds.
2. Request for Information (RFI)
To prepare for this round of funding,
on November 10, 2009, RUS and NTIA
released a second joint request for
information seeking public comment on
ways to enhance the applicant
experience through targeted revisions to
the First NOFA.9 RUS and NTIA
8 White House Press Release, Vice President
Biden Kicks Off $7.2 Billion Recovery Act
Broadband Program (December 17, 2009), available
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/vicepresident-biden-kicks-72-billion-recovery-actbroadband-program. Department of Commerce
Press Release, Commerce Secretary Gary Locke
Announces $7.5 Million Investment to Increase
Broadband Access in Los Angeles (January 13,
2010), available at https://www.commerce.gov/
newsroom/pressreleases_factsheets/prod01_008797.
9 Joint Request for Information (RFI), 74 FR 58940
(Nov. 16, 2009).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3793
received approximately 225 comments
from institutions and individuals on a
wide range of topics, and these
comments have played an important
role in developing this NOFA. For
further discussion and explanation of
NTIA’s reliance on the public comments
in the policy decisions involved in
BTOP, see the attached Policy
Justification found in the Appendix at
the end of this NOFA.
3. Project Categories
For this round of funding, NTIA will
award grants in three categories of
eligible projects: Comprehensive
Community Infrastructure (CCI), Public
Computer Centers (PCC), and
Sustainable Broadband Adoption
(SBA).10 The CCI category will focus on
Middle Mile broadband infrastructure
projects that offer new or substantially
upgraded connections to community
anchor institutions, especially
community colleges. The PCC category
will help expand public access to
broadband service and enhance
broadband capacity at entities that
permit the public to use these
computing centers, such as community
colleges and public libraries.11 The SBA
category will fund innovative projects
that promote broadband demand,
including projects focused on providing
broadband education, awareness,
training, access, equipment, or support,
particularly among vulnerable
population groups that traditionally
have underutilized broadband
technology.12
NTIA plans to award all remaining
BTOP grants funded by the Recovery
Act in this round of funding.
Approximately $2.6 billion of programlevel funding has been allocated to this
NOFA by NTIA. NTIA intends to award
approximately $2.35 billion for CCI
projects, at least $150 million for PCC
projects, and at least $100 million for
SBA projects.
4. Changes From the First NOFA
Based on the comments received in
response to the second RFI and the
experience gained from administering
the first round of funding, NTIA is
making a number of changes to the
Program. The goals of these changes are
to increase efficiency, sharpen the
Program’s funding focus, and improve
the applicant experience.
In the first round, RUS and NTIA
issued a joint BIP/BTOP NOFA to
10 See
Recovery Act Div. A, Tit. II, 123 Stat. at
128.
11 Id. Div. A, Tit. II & sec. 6001(b)(3), 123 Stat. at
128, 512–13.
12 Id. Div. A, Tit. II & sec. 6001(b)(5), 123 Stat. at
128, 513.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
3794
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
promote coordination between these
programs. The agencies gave applicants
the option to file a single application for
infrastructure projects for both
programs. For the second round of
funding, RUS and NTIA have decided to
issue separate NOFAs for BIP and BTOP
to better promote each agency’s distinct
objectives. The joint application process
was burdensome for some applicants.
Therefore, RUS and NTIA have
eliminated the option of allowing
applicants to file a single, joint BIP/
BTOP application in the second funding
round in favor of separate applications.
NTIA has sought to bring further
leverage to Federal funds by giving
additional consideration to projects that
propose to contribute a non-Federal cost
share/match that equals or exceeds 30
percent of the total eligible costs of the
project.
In addition, NTIA is adopting a
‘‘comprehensive communities’’ approach
to award BTOP grants for infrastructure
projects that emphasize Middle Mile
broadband capabilities and new or
substantially upgraded connections to
community anchor institutions to
maximize the benefits of BTOP funds. In
adopting this approach, NTIA has
restructured the Broadband
Infrastructure category of the First
NOFA into the CCI category for this
second round of funding.
Further, NTIA has implemented other
targeted changes to several Program
provisions. In particular, NTIA has
reduced the number of BTOP’s
eligibility factors to just three criteria—
eligible entities, fully completed
application, and matching—which will
be used to determine whether an
application is eligible for consideration.
NTIA has further streamlined the
eligibility review by removing the
budget reasonableness and technical
feasibility factors from the eligibility
requirements, because these categories
are more effectively evaluated during
the expert review and due diligence
phases of application consideration.
NTIA also has changed the number of
expert reviewers from at least three to at
least two in order to make the expert
review process as efficient as possible,
without impacting the rigor of review.
NTIA will review CCI applications
according to the priorities established in
Section II.B. Additionally, NTIA has
clarified the process for requesting
waivers from several key statutory and
programmatic obligations, including the
matching fund requirement, Last Mile
coverage obligation, and restriction on
the sale or lease of project assets.
With respect to the application, NTIA
will now collect the information most
essential to project review in the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
application itself, with the option to
collect additional data during the due
diligence review, as needed. In addition,
NTIA has made numerous adjustments
to the online application system to
streamline the intake of information and
reduce applicant burden. In particular,
NTIA has reduced the overall number of
attachments to the applications. It also
has separated the BTOP infrastructure
application from the BIP infrastructure
application and separated the PCC
application from the SBA application.
Moreover, it has eliminated the
proposed funded service area mapping
tool and modified the service area
delineations from Census blocks to
Census tracts and block groups. NTIA
also has made it easier for applicants
filing applications in multiple project
categories to link these applications, in
furtherance of NTIA’s focus on
comprehensive communities.
II. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Statutory Purposes
Section 6001 of the Recovery Act
establishes a national broadband service
development and expansion program to
promote five core purposes:
a. To provide access to broadband
service to consumers residing in
unserved areas of the country;
b. To provide improved access to
broadband service to consumers
residing in underserved areas of the
country;
c. To provide broadband education,
awareness, training, access, equipment,
and support to: (i) Schools, libraries,
medical and healthcare providers,
community colleges and other
institutions of higher learning, and other
community support organizations; (ii)
organizations and agencies that provide
outreach, access, equipment, and
support services to facilitate greater use
of broadband services by vulnerable
populations (e.g., low-income,
unemployed, aged); or (iii) job-creating
strategic facilities located in State- or
Federally-designated economic
development zones;
d. To improve access to, and use of,
broadband service by public safety
agencies; and
e. To stimulate the demand for
broadband, economic growth, and job
creation.13
B. BTOP Priorities
All projects funded under BTOP must
advance one or more of the five
statutory purposes outlined above. The
Program is designed to extend
broadband access to unserved areas,
13 See
PO 00000
id. Sec. 6001(b), 123 Stat. at 512–13.
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
improve access to underserved areas,
and expand broadband access to a wide
range of institutions and individuals,
including vulnerable populations. It
will seek to serve the highest priority
needs for Federal investment—
particularly projects that offer the
potential for economic growth and job
creation. The Program will support
viable, sustainable, and scalable
projects.
1. Comprehensive Community
Infrastructure Projects
a. Background
In the first funding round, NTIA
solicited Broadband Infrastructure
applications in two categories, Last Mile
and Middle Mile. Last Mile projects
were defined as any infrastructure
project the predominant purpose of
which is to provide broadband service
to end users or end-user devices. Middle
Mile projects were defined as any
broadband infrastructure project that
does not predominantly provide
broadband service to end users or to
end-user devices and that may include
interoffice transport, backhaul, Internet
connectivity, or special access. Middle
Mile projects funded to date in Round
One also included expanding and
enhancing broadband services for
community anchor institutions such as
schools, libraries, colleges and
universities, medical and healthcare
providers, public safety entities, and
other community support organizations.
Recognizing the significant
importance of Middle Mile
infrastructure to improving broadband
capabilities for consumers residing in
unserved and underserved areas of the
nation, NTIA has awarded a significant
portion of funds in the first round of
funding to Middle Mile projects,
particularly those that connect a
significant number of community
anchor institutions. Such projects
provide substantial benefits, including
enhancing broadband service for
community anchor institutions,
facilitating the development of Last Mile
broadband services in unserved and
underserved areas, and promoting
economic growth.
b. CCI Funding Priorities
In this round of funding, NTIA seeks
to focus on Middle Mile projects by
adopting a ‘‘comprehensive
communities’’ approach to awarding
BTOP infrastructure grants. Under this
approach, priority will be given to CCI
projects that include a Middle Mile
component and satisfy certain
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
additional considerations.14 This
prioritization will be used for the
sequencing of applications for the
objective merit review performed by
expert reviewers.15 In particular, the
highest priority for merit review will be
given to CCI applications that satisfy all
of the criteria below. Note that the
application evaluation process will
continue to consider additional factors,
including, for example, the degree to
which the projects will benefit
consumers residing in unserved or
underserved areas, the participation of
an Indian Tribe or socially and
economically disadvantaged small
business concern as defined under
Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act
(as modified by NTIA’s adoption of an
alternative small business concern size
standard for use in BTOP),16 and the
ability of a project to leverage funding
from another Recovery Act program or
other State or Federal development
program.17 In order of importance, the
CCI priority criteria are set forth as
follows:
(1) Projects that will deploy Middle
Mile broadband infrastructure with a
commitment to offer new or
substantially upgraded service to
community anchor institutions. Those
projects proposing to serve a significant
number of community anchor
institutions that have expressed a
demand or indicated a need for access
or improved access to broadband service
will receive higher priority;
(2) Projects that will deploy Middle
Mile broadband infrastructure and
incorporate a public-private partnership
among government, non-profit and forprofit entities, and other key community
stakeholders, particularly those that
have expressed a demand or indicated
a need for access or improved access to
broadband service;
(3) Projects that will deploy Middle
Mile broadband infrastructure with the
intent to bolster growth in economically
distressed areas;
(4) Projects that will deploy Middle
Mile broadband infrastructure with a
commitment to serve community
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
14 Consistent
with the terms of the Recovery Act,
in this funding round NTIA will not fund Middle
Mile projects in areas that RUS has already funded
with Middle Mile awards made through BIP.
15 See Department of Commerce (DOC) Grants and
Cooperative Agreements Interim Manual (Grants
Manual), ch. 8, secs. B.1.c. and B.3 (June 21, 2007)
(available at https://oam.ocs.doc.gov/GMD_updateddoc.html).
16 15 U.S.C. 637(a)(4). NTIA sought the Small
Business Administration’s approval to adopt a $40
million alternative small business size standard for
BTOP. The Small Business Administration issued a
letter approving the use of this alternative size
standard of $40 million to define a small business
concern for purposes of BTOP.
17 See infra Section VII.A.1.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
colleges that have expressed a demand
or indicated a need for access or
improved access to broadband service;
(5) Projects that will deploy Middle
Mile broadband infrastructure with a
commitment to serve public safety
entities that have expressed a demand
or indicated a need for access or
improved access to broadband service;
(6) Projects that will deploy Middle
Mile broadband infrastructure that
includes (i) a Last Mile infrastructure
component in unserved or underserved
areas; or (ii) commitments or nonbinding letters of intent from one or
more Last Mile broadband service
providers.18 For Last Mile infrastructure
components in rural areas, however, the
additional costs of the Last Mile
component used to offer service to
residential consumers and noncommunity anchor institutions may not
exceed more than 20 percent of the total
eligible costs of the project; and
(7) Projects that will deploy Middle
Mile broadband infrastructure and
propose to contribute a non-Federal cost
match that equals or exceeds 30 percent
of the total eligible costs of the project.
To the extent that a CCI applicant
with a Middle Mile component does not
address all of the criteria set forth above
(i.e., criteria (1)–(7)), NTIA will
prioritize those applications remaining
for merit review in the order that they
satisfy the most highly-ranked criteria
(i.e., applications satisfying criteria (1)–
(6) will be sequenced for merit review,
then applications satisfying (1)–(5), then
(1)–(4), then (1)–(3), then (1)–(2)
respectively, and, finally, applications
that satisfy only the first criterion). All
other CCI applicants with a Middle Mile
component, that is, those that do not
satisfy the first criterion identified
above, will be next in priority for merit
review.
c. ‘‘Comprehensive Communities’’ Policy
Rationale
The ‘‘comprehensive communities’’
approach, with its focus on the
deployment of Middle Mile broadband
facilities and the provision of new or
substantially upgraded connections to
community anchor institutions as its
centerpiece, will provide a number of
benefits to the public and taxpayers.
‘‘Comprehensive communities’’ projects
can leverage resources and better ensure
sustainable community growth and
prosperity. These projects also can
create consumer demand and lay the
foundation for the ultimate provision of
18 Consistent with the terms of the Recovery Act,
in this funding round NTIA will not fund Last Mile
projects in areas that RUS has already funded with
Last Mile awards made through BIP.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3795
reasonably priced end-user broadband
services in unserved and underserved
communities. Open and
nondiscriminatory CCI projects funded
by BTOP will enable other service
providers to serve the community.19
Once Middle Mile facilities are built,
the costs of providing services to a
broad array of end users are reduced.
Much like the interstate highways that
link together the nation’s roads and
streets, Middle Mile broadband facilities
play a critical role in the healthy
functioning of the nation’s broadband
infrastructure and are a necessary
foundation for the ultimate provision of
affordable end-user broadband services
in unserved and underserved
communities.
Expanding Middle Mile broadband
service not only enhances the
availability and affordability of end-user
broadband connectivity for consumers
and businesses, it also increases the
effectiveness of community anchor
institutions in fulfilling their missions.
Schools, libraries, colleges and
universities, medical and healthcare
providers, public safety entities, and
other community support organizations
increasingly rely on high-speed Internet
connectivity to serve their
constituencies and their communities.
Expanding broadband capabilities for
community anchor institutions will
result in substantial benefits for the
entire community, delivering improved
education, healthcare, and economic
development.
CCI projects are also job-intensive and
pave the way for a ripple effect of
economic development throughout the
communities they touch. Focusing the
awards in this funding round on CCI
projects that provide high-speed Middle
Mile networks to connect community
anchor institutions, including
community colleges, or benefit
consumers residing in unserved or
underserved areas will maximize the
benefits of Recovery Act dollars and lay
a foundation for economic development
for years to come.20
d. Relationship to BIP
Although BIP and BTOP no longer
will offer a joint application, RUS and
NTIA continue to collaborate to
maximize the impact of available
Federal funding, to best leverage the
experience and expertise of each
agency, and to avoid geographic overlap
19 See
Recovery Act sec. 6001(j), 123 Stat. at 515.
National Economic Council, Recovery Act
Investments in Broadband: Leveraging Federal
Dollars to Create Jobs and Connect America (Dec.
2009), available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/
sites/default/files/20091217-recovery-actinvestments-broadband.pdf.
20 See
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3796
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
in projects funded by the two agencies
(as required by the Recovery Act).21 To
accomplish these objectives, NTIA
strongly recommends that CCI
applicants that are currently RUS loan
or grant recipients as well as any CCI
applicant whose project will include a
Last Mile service area that is at least 75
percent rural apply to BIP for funding.
Applications from such applicants will
not be viewed favorably by NTIA and
will not be a funding priority.
e. Exclusive Last Mile Projects
As explained above, priority will be
given to CCI projects that include a
Middle Mile component. While a CCI
project may exclusively contain a Last
Mile component, it will only be
considered for merit review and funding
after all projects with a Middle Mile
component have been considered.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
2. Public Computer Centers (PCC)
In this funding round, consistent with
the Recovery Act, NTIA will fund PCC
projects. These projects provide
broadband access to the general public
or a specific vulnerable population and
must either create or expand a public
computer center or improve broadband
service or connections at a public
computer center, including those at
community colleges, that meets a
specific public need for broadband
service. PCC projects are a logical
complement to CCI projects, because
they are uniquely positioned to serve
many members of a community with
computer equipment, computer
training, job training, and access to job
and educational resources that might
not otherwise be available.
3. Sustainable Broadband Adoption
(SBA)
Consistent with the Recovery Act and
the promotion of BTOP’s five core
objectives, NTIA also will fund SBA
projects. The SBA program is designed
to fund innovative projects that promote
broadband demand, especially among
vulnerable population groups where
broadband technology traditionally has
been underutilized. Broadband
technology has reshaped the way our
nation functions, and NTIA recognizes
that broadband adoption projects strive
to ensure that as much of the population
as possible has opportunities, abilities,
and resources to thrive in today’s
society. With projects focusing on
broadband awareness, access, training,
and education, barriers to broadband
adoption can be overcome, fostering
educational and business opportunities
and a more competitive country as a
21 Recovery
Act Tit. I, 123 Stat. at 118.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
whole. NTIA, therefore, seeks SBA
projects that, after establishing a
subscribership baseline in a given
community, demonstrate a clear ability
to measure and sustain the expected
increase in broadband adoption without
ongoing Federal grant assistance, so that
the nation will continue to see the
benefits of these projects well after the
period of performance for the grant
award has ended.
C. Application Review and the Selection
Process
1. Initial Review
NTIA will conduct an initial review of
applications to determine whether they
meet the eligibility requirements set
forth in Section V.A. through V.C. of
this NOFA. These requirements are
mandatory, and applicants that fail to
meet them will not have their
applications considered further.
2. Scoring Applications
Subsequent to this initial eligibility
review, applications will be separated
into the three project categories. For
PCC and SBA projects, applications will
receive an Evaluation Criteria Review
score by at least two objective expert
reviewers who may be Federal
employees or non-Federal persons. For
CCI projects, program staff will
prioritize the applications for the
Evaluation Criteria Review based on the
BTOP priorities set forth in Section II.B.,
and then the applications will be
evaluated in priority order by at least
two objective expert reviewers who may
be Federal employees or non-Federal
persons. No consensus advice will be
provided by the non-Federal expert
reviewers.
Reviewers will be selected based on
their expertise in: (i) Analyzing a
business or organizational model
pursuant to BTOP purposes; (ii)
designing, funding, constructing, or
operating broadband networks or public
computer centers; (iii) broadbandrelated outreach, training, or education;
(iv) innovative programs to increase the
demand for broadband services; or (v)
other broadband-related functions or
activities. Reviewers will evaluate
applications against the evaluation
criteria provided in this NOFA and
independently score each application.
Reviewer scores will be averaged and
NTIA will establish thresholds that will
be used to determine which
applications are considered ‘‘highly
qualified.’’ Highly qualified applications
may be considered further for an award
by NTIA Program staff and given a ‘‘due
diligence’’ review. For CCI projects,
priority in due diligence processing will
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
be given to applications that best
conform to BTOP priorities as expressed
in Section II.B.1.b of this NOFA.
3. State and Tribal Consultation
The Recovery Act authorizes NTIA to
consult with States, territories,
possessions, and the District of
Columbia (‘‘States’’) regarding the
identification of unserved and
underserved areas within their borders
and the allocation of grant funds to
projects in or affecting their State.22
After the application deadline, NTIA
will invite each State, via its Governor,
to provide input on those geographic
areas within the State for which NTIA
should give priority in selecting projects
for funding. States may, if they wish,
comment on specific BTOP applications
that propose to serve areas within their
jurisdiction, regardless of the size or
geographic scope of the project and, at
their discretion, provide an explanation
for why certain applications meet the
greatest needs of the State. NTIA also
will extend the invitation to tribal
entities to comment upon applications
that propose to serve tribal communities
in an effort to fund projects that best
meet the needs of their tribal lands.
NTIA will share data that are
available on the publicly searchable
application database with each relevant
State and tribe. States and tribes that
wish to review additional information
regarding applications proposing to
serve areas within their jurisdiction may
request such information from
applicants directly. States and tribes
will not be required to rank or comment
on BTOP applications in order for
applications affecting their areas to
receive funding. The input of States and
tribes is consultative in nature and,
while extremely valuable, constitutes
only one among several factors the
Selecting Official, the Assistant
Secretary, weighs when evaluating
applications. States or tribes will not
have the ability to veto any particular
project. States and tribes will have no
less than 20 calendar days from the date
of notification to submit their comments
to NTIA. NTIA will make the comments
of the States and tribes publicly
available at https://
www.broadbandusa.gov. Accordingly,
States and tribes should not include in
their comments to NTIA any
information that is deemed confidential
and proprietary.
4. Due Diligence Review
During due diligence review,
applicants may be asked to submit
additional information, as appropriate,
22 Recovery
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
Act sec. 6001(c), 123 Stat. at 513.
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
to clarify or to further substantiate the
representations made in their
applications. The supplemental
information, along with all information
submitted with the application, will be
reviewed and analyzed by NTIA
Program staff to confirm eligibility and
evaluate the applications with respect to
general Program requirements, the
appropriate Federal share of the project,
evaluation criteria, and selection factors.
Applicants whose supporting
documents are not timely filed or who
do not adequately substantiate the
representations in their applications
may be rejected. NTIA may, at its
discretion, request supplemental
documentation before deciding to reject
such applications and re-evaluate the
application package based on all of the
information presented.
At any time during the application
review process, NTIA reserves the right
to discuss with the applicant specific
modifications to the application to
resolve any differences that may exist
between the applicant’s original request
and NTIA’s determination of eligible
costs and funding priorities, including,
for example, the right to adjust the
Federal share of the project. Note that it
is NTIA’s intent to fund only the portion
of the project that satisfies Program
purposes and is justified based on an
analysis of anticipated costs and
revenues. Specifically, pursuant to the
Recovery Act requirement that
applicants demonstrate that a project
would not have been implemented
during the grant period without Federal
assistance, NTIA may seek to adjust the
amount of funds made available for the
Federal share of the project to a level
warranted based on this ‘‘but for’’ test.23
Not all applicants contacted necessarily
will receive a BTOP award. Upon
completion of due diligence, NTIA
Program staff will summarize their
analysis for each application reviewed.
5. The Selection Process
The Director of BTOP (BTOP Director)
will prepare and present a package or
packages of recommended grant awards
to the Associate Administrator for the
Office of Telecommunications and
Information Applications (OTIA
Associate Administrator), or his/her
designee, for review and approval. The
BTOP Director’s recommendations and
the OTIA Associate Administrator’s
review and approval will consider the
following selection factors:
a. The Evaluation Criteria Review
score of the objective expert reviewers;
b. The analysis of NTIA Program staff;
23 See
Recovery Act sec. 6001(e)(3), 123 Stat. at
514.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
c. Satisfaction of the statutory
purposes and BTOP priorities set forth
in Section II.;
d. The extent to which the nonFederal cost match equals or exceeds 30
percent of the total eligible costs of the
project;
e. The geographic distribution of the
proposed grant awards (e.g., ensuring
that, to the extent practical, NTIA
awards not less than one grant in each
State as set forth in the Recovery Act);
f. The range of technologies and uses
of the technologies employed by the
proposed grant awards;
g. Avoidance of redundancy,
duplication, and conflicts with the
initiatives of other Federal agencies,
including Department of Agriculture
loan and grant programs for broadband
services, applicable universal service
programs authorized by the Federal
Communications Commission, and, to
the extent practical, avoidance of unjust
enrichment; 24
h. The availability of funds;
i. If applicable, the comments of
States, including, but not limited to,
such comments as described in their
application for the Broadband Mapping
Program or as subsequently provided to
NTIA either on their own or along with
the submission of State-level broadband
maps; 25 and
j. If applicable, the comments of tribal
entities.
Upon approval of the OTIA Associate
Administrator or designee, the BTOP
Director’s recommendations then will
be presented to the Selecting Official.
The Assistant Secretary selects the
applications for grant awards, taking
into consideration the BTOP Director’s
and the OTIA Associate
Administrator’s, or his or her designee’s,
recommendations and the degree to
which the application package, taken as
a whole, satisfies the selection factors
described above and the Program’s
statutory purposes and priorities as set
forth in Sections II of this NOFA.
Awards will be made on a rolling basis
subject to the availability of funds.
Unsuccessful applicants will be notified
in writing.
III. Definitions
The terms and conditions provided in
this NOFA are applicable to and for
purposes of this NOFA only.
Applicant means an entity requesting
approval of an award under this NOFA.
24 Recovery
Act sec. 6001(h)(2)(D), 123 Stat. at
515.
25 Consistent with the Recovery Act, the
Broadband Mapping Program provides participating
States the opportunity to identify unserved and
underserved areas in their State.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3797
Assistant Secretary means the
Assistant Secretary for Communications
and Information, National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration, Department of
Commerce, or the Assistant Secretary’s
designee.
Award means a grant made under this
NOFA by NTIA.
Awardee means a grantee.
Broadband means providing two-way
data transmission with advertised
speeds of at least 768 kilobits per
second (kbps) downstream and at least
200 kbps upstream to end users, or
providing sufficient capacity in a
Middle Mile project to support the
provision of broadband service to end
users.
BTOP means the Broadband
Technology Opportunities Program,
administered by NTIA, under the
Recovery Act.
Build-out means the construction or
improvement of facilities and
equipment as specified in the
application.
Community anchor institutions means
schools, libraries, medical and
healthcare providers, public safety
entities, community colleges and other
institutions of higher education, and
other community support organizations
and agencies that provide outreach,
access, equipment, and support services
to facilitate greater use of broadband
service by vulnerable populations,
including low-income, the unemployed,
and the aged.
Comprehensive Community
Infrastructure (CCI) project means an
infrastructure project that focuses
primarily on providing new or
substantially upgraded connections to
community anchor institutions.
Economically distressed area means
an area that has: (i) A per capita income
of 80 percent or less of the national
average; and (ii) an unemployment rate
that is, for the most recent 24-month
period for which data are available, at
least one percent greater than the
national average unemployment rate.26
Forecast period means the time period
used by NTIA to determine if an
application is financially feasible.
Financial feasibility of an application is
based on eight-year projections.
GAAP means generally accepted
accounting principles.
Grant agreement means the agreement
between NTIA and the grantee for grants
awarded under this NOFA, including
26 This definition is derived from regulations
adopted by the Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce,
regarding the Public Works and Economic
Development Act of 1965, as amended. See 13 CFR
301.3.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3798
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
any amendments thereto, setting forth
the binding terms and conditions
relating to Federal funding under BTOP.
Sample grant agreements are available
for review at https://
www.broadbandusa.gov or https://
www.ntia.doc.gov.
Grant funds means Federal funds
provided pursuant to a grant made
under this NOFA.
Grantee means the prime recipient of
a grant under this NOFA.
Last Mile means those components of
a CCI project that provide broadband
service to end-user devices through an
intermediate point of aggregation. That
is, in most cases, the Last Mile
connection goes from the end-user
device through an intermediate point of
aggregation (i.e., a remote terminal, fiber
node, wireless tower, or other
equivalent access point) to a primary IP
routing entity in a centralized facility
(i.e., in the central office, the cable
headend, the wireless switching station,
or other equivalent centralized facility).
The Last Mile also includes equivalent
services that, solely because of close
proximity between the customer and
centralized facility, are routed directly
to the centralized facility. The Last Mile
will terminate at, and include, the
initial customer-facing router or
aggregation switch in the centralized
facility (e.g., a DSLAM, CMTS, RNC, or
equivalent) that is utilized to deliver
Last Mile broadband service.
Last Mile service area means the
service area of a Last Mile component of
a CCI project, composed of one or more
contiguous Census block groups 27 or
tracts,28 where the applicant is
requesting BTOP funds to provide
27 A Census block group is a cluster of Census
blocks having the same first digit of their four-digit
identifying numbers within a Census tract. A
Census block group is the next level above Census
block in the geographic hierarchy.
28 Census tracts are small, relatively permanent
statistical subdivisions of a county. Census tracts
are delineated for most metropolitan areas (MAs)
and other densely populated counties by local
Census statistical areas committees following
Census Bureau guidelines (more than 3,000 Census
tracts have been established in 221 counties outside
MAs). Census tracts usually have between 2,500
and 8,000 persons and, when first delineated, are
designed to be homogeneous with respect to
population characteristics, economic status, and
living conditions. Census tracts do not cross county
boundaries. The spatial size of Census tracts varies
widely depending on the density of settlement.
Census tract boundaries are delineated with the
intention of being maintained over a long time so
that statistical comparisons can be made from
Census to Census. However, physical changes in
street patterns caused by highway construction,
new development, or other reasons may require
occasional revisions; Census tracts occasionally are
split due to large population growth, or combined
as a result of substantial population decline. See the
Census Bureau’s Web site at https://www.census.gov
for more detailed information on its data gathering
methodology.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
broadband service to end-user devices
through an intermediate point of
aggregation and terminating at the
initial customer-facing router or
aggregation switch in the centralized
facility used to deliver the Last Mile
broadband service.
Middle Mile means those components
of a CCI project that provide broadband
service from one or more centralized
facilities, (i.e., the central office, the
cable headend, the wireless switching
station, or other equivalent centralized
facility) to an Internet point of presence.
The Middle Mile includes, among other
things, the centralized facilities and all
of the equipment in those facilities,
except for any equipment that would
qualify as part of a Last Mile component
as defined in this NOFA.
Middle Mile service area means the
project service area, composed of one or
more contiguous Census block groups or
tracts, where the applicant is requesting
BTOP funds to provide broadband
service from one or more centralized
facilities, (i.e., the central office, the
cable headend, the wireless switching
station, or other equivalent centralized
facility) to an Internet point of presence.
Pre-application expense means any
reasonable expense incurred after the
release of this NOFA up to the issuance
of the grant award from NTIA to prepare
an application. These expenses include
engineering costs, accountant or other
consultant fees, and costs related to
developing the proposal. Lobbying costs
and contingency fees are not included
as pre-application expenses.
Proposed funded service area means
the total service area of a CCI project
where broadband service will be
provided.
Public computer center means a place,
including but not limited to community
colleges, libraries, schools, youth
centers, employment service centers,
Native American chapter houses,
community centers, senior centers,
assistive technology centers for people
with disabilities, community health
centers, and Neighborhood Network
Centers in public housing
developments, that provide broadband
access to the general public or a specific
vulnerable population, such as lowincome, unemployed, aged, children,
minorities, and people with disabilities.
Recipient means any entity that
receives Recovery Act funds directly
from the Federal government (including
Recovery Act funds received through a
grant) other than an individual. This
includes a State that receives Recovery
Act funds.
Recovery Act means the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009,
Pub. L. 111–5, 123 Stat. 115 (2009).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Rural area means any area, as
confirmed by the latest decennial
Census of the U.S. Census Bureau, that
is not located within: (i) A city, town,
or incorporated area that has a
population of greater than 20,000
inhabitants; or (ii) an urbanized area
contiguous and adjacent to a city or
town that has a population of greater
than 50,000 inhabitants. For purposes of
the definition of rural area, an urbanized
area means a densely populated
territory as defined in the latest
decennial Census of the U.S. Census
Bureau.
Socially and Economically
Disadvantaged Small Business Concern
means a firm, together with its
controlling interests and affiliates, with
average gross revenue not exceeding $40
million for the preceding three years,
and that meets the definition of a
socially and economically
disadvantaged small business concern
under the Small Business Act.29
State means, for purposes of BTOP, a
State or political subdivision thereof,
the District of Columbia, or a territory or
possession of the United States.
Sub-recipient means an entity that
expends Recovery Act funds received
through a subaward from a recipient to
carry out a Federal program but does not
include an individual who is a
beneficiary of such a program.30
Tribe means an Indian tribe that has
the meaning given that term in Section
4(e) of the Indian Self-Determination
and Education Assistance Act.31
Underserved area means a Last Mile
or Middle Mile service area, where at
least one of the following factors is met:
(i) No more than 50 percent of the
households in the Last Mile or Middle
Mile service area have access to
facilities-based, terrestrial broadband
service at greater than the minimum
broadband transmission speed (set forth
in the definition of broadband above);
(ii) no fixed or mobile terrestrial
broadband service provider advertises to
residential end users broadband
transmission speeds of at least three
megabits per second (‘‘Mbps’’)
downstream in the Last Mile or Middle
Mile service area; or (iii) the rate of
terrestrial broadband subscribership for
the Last Mile or Middle Mile service
area is 40 percent of households or less.
29 15 U.S.C. 637(a)(4) (as modified by the Small
Business Administration’s approval of NTIA’s
request to adopt an alternative small business
concern size standard for use in BTOP).
30 Implementing Guidance for Reports on Use of
Funds Pursuant to the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (OMB M–09–21 June 22,
2009), available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/
omb/assets/memoranda_fy2009/m09–21.pdf.
31 25 U.S.C. 450b(e).
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
An underserved area may include
individual Census block groups or tracts
that on their own would not be
considered underserved. The
availability of or subscribership rates for
satellite broadband service is not
considered for the purpose of
determining whether an area is
underserved.
Unserved area means a Last Mile or
Middle Mile service area where at least
90 percent of the households lack access
to facilities-based, terrestrial broadband
service, either fixed or mobile, at the
minimum broadband transmission
speed (set forth in the definition of
broadband above). An unserved area
may include individual Census block
groups or tracts that on their own would
not be considered unserved. A
household has access to broadband
service if the household readily can
subscribe to that service upon request.
The availability of or subscribership
rates for satellite broadband service is
not considered for the purpose of
determining whether an area is
unserved.
IV. Award Information
A. General
Approximately $2.6 billion in budget
authority has been set aside for funding
opportunities under this NOFA.
Publication of this NOFA does not
obligate NTIA to award any specific
project or obligate all of the available
funds. Based on Round 1 experience,
NTIA expects this grant round to be
very competitive. During Round 1, RUS
and NTIA received approximately 2,200
applications collectively requesting
nearly $28 billion in Federal funds.
B. Funding Limits
Approximately $2.6 billion is
available to be awarded under this
NOFA, which NTIA anticipates will be
allocated in the following categories:
a. Approximately $2.35 billion will be
made available for CCI projects;
b. At least $150 million will be made
available for PCC projects; and
c. At least $100 million will be made
available for SBA projects.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
C. Repooling
Subject to the statutory thresholds set
forth in the Recovery Act, NTIA retains
the discretion to divert funds from one
category of projects to another.
D. Unused Funds
Funds remaining from the initial
round of funding due to BTOP funding
priorities or any other reason, and
unused funds not awarded under the
Broadband Mapping Program, may be
used to augment the BTOP funding
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
categories established above.32 NTIA
reserves the right to reopen the
application window or release
subsequent NOFAs to ensure that all
funds are awarded by September 30,
2010.
E. Award Amount
Given NTIA’s Round 1 experience,
NTIA expects to make awards within
the following funding ranges. These
ranges are not required minimums and
maximums, but applicants requesting
amounts for projects outside of these
ranges must provide a reasoned
explanation for the variance in their
project size.
CCI: $5 million–$150 million
PCC: $500,000–$15 million
SBA: $500,000–$15 million
F. Award Period
All awards under BTOP must be made
no later than September 30, 2010.33
While the completion time will vary
depending on the complexity of the
project, grant recipients must
substantially complete projects
supported by this Program no later than
two years, and projects must be fully
completed no later than three years,
following the date of issuance of the
grant award.34
G. Type of Funding Instrument
The funding instrument will be a
grant.
V. Eligibility Information for BTOP
Applicants must satisfy the eligibility
requirements set forth below in Sections
V.A. through V.C. to qualify for funding.
Applicants failing to comply with these
requirements will not be considered for
an award.
A. Eligible Entities
1. Applicant Organization
The following entities are eligible to
apply for funding:
a. States, local governments, or any
agency, subdivision, instrumentality, or
political subdivision thereof;
b. The District of Columbia;
c. A territory or possession of the
United States;
d. An Indian tribe (as defined in
Section 4 of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b));
e. A native Hawaiian organization;
f. A non-profit foundation, a nonprofit corporation, a non-profit
institution, or a non-profit association;
g. Other non-profit entities;
h. For-profit corporations;
i. Limited liability companies; and
j. Cooperative or mutual
organizations.
2. BTOP Public Interest Finding
Section 6001(e)(1)(C) of the Recovery
Act authorizes the Assistant Secretary to
find by rule that it is in the public
interest for any entity not otherwise
encompassed by Section 6001(e)(1) to be
eligible for a BTOP grant to the extent
that such finding will promote the
purposes of BTOP in a technology
neutral manner. Consistent with the
rationale set forth in the First NOFA,35
the Assistant Secretary found it to be in
the public interest to permit for-profit
corporations and non-profit entities (not
otherwise encompassed by Section
6001(e)(1)(B)) that are willing to
promote the goals of the Recovery Act
and comply with the statutory
requirements of BTOP to be eligible for
a grant. By adopting this broad
approach, the Assistant Secretary
intended to invite a diverse group of
applicants to participate in BTOP and to
expand broadband capabilities in a
technology neutral manner.36 NTIA will
continue to permit these same entities to
apply for funding in this next round of
awards.
B. Fully Completed Application
All applications will be evaluated
initially to ensure that they are fully
complete, certified, and contain all
supporting documentation.
C. Cost Share/Matching
1. Matching Requirement
In general, awardees under BTOP are
required by statute to provide matching
funds of at least 20 percent toward the
total eligible costs of the project unless
the Assistant Secretary grants a waiver.
For costs to be eligible to meet matching
requirements, they first must be
allowable under the grant program.
Eligible cost concepts are discussed in
more detail in Section V.E. of this
NOFA. Applicants must document in
their application their capacity to
provide matching funds. NTIA will
provide up to 80 percent of the total
eligible costs of the project, unless the
applicant petitions the Assistant
Secretary for a waiver of the matching
requirement and that waiver is granted
based on the applicant’s demonstration
of financial need, as discussed below.37
Generally, Federal funds may not be
used as a cost match except as provided
35 See
32 See
supra note 6.
33 Recovery Act sec. 6001(d)(2), 123 Stat. at 513.
34 Id. Sec. 6001(d)(3), 123 Stat. at 513.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3799
74 FR at 33134 (July 9, 2009).
Act sec. 6001(e)(1)(C), 123 Stat. at
513; 74 FR at 33110.
37 See id. sec. 6001(f), 123 Stat. at 514.
36 Recovery
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3800
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
by Federal statute.38 In-kind
contributions, including third party inkind contributions, are non-cash
donations to a project that may count
toward satisfying the non-Federal
matching requirement of a project’s total
budgeted costs. In-kind contributions
must be allowable project expenses.
Such contributions may be accepted as
part of an applicant’s matching costs
when such contributions meet certain
criteria.39
Applicants that propose to provide a
cost match that is all cash will be given
additional favorable consideration in
the application review process.
Additionally, applicants will be given
favorable consideration in the selection
process by proposing to contribute a
non-Federal cost match that equals or
exceeds 30 percent of the total eligible
costs of the projects. CCI applicants are
strongly encouraged to not request more
Federal funding than they require to
make the project financially feasible and
sustainable.40
2. Petition for Waiver
In requesting a waiver of the matching
requirement, an applicant should fully
explain and document its inability to
provide the required 20 percent
matching share of the eligible costs of
the proposed project. In demonstrating
financial need, the applicant should
submit: (1) Documents that include the
applicant’s assets, liabilities, operating
expenses, and revenues from any
existing operations; (2) denial of
funding from a public or private lending
institution; or (3) any other documents
that demonstrate financial need. Mere
statements of financial need without
supporting documentation will not be
viewed favorably. The petition for
waiver and documentation must be set
forth clearly in the application. The
Assistant Secretary will evaluate the
information provided in support of the
petition and may increase the Federal
share if financial need is demonstrated.
D. General Program Requirements
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
1. Timely Completion
Applicants must demonstrate that the
project can be substantially completed
within two years of the start date of the
grant award and fully completed no
later than three years following the date
of issuance of the grant award. A BTOP
38 See Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, Other Nonprofit, and
Commercial Organizations, 15 CFR 14.23(a)(5); see
also Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and
Local Governments, 24 CFR 24.24(b)(1).
39 See 15 CFR 14.23(a), 24.24(a).
40 See supra Section II.C.4.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
project is considered ‘‘substantially
complete’’ when a grantee has met 67
percent of the project milestones and
received 67 percent of its award funds.
In evaluating compliance with this
factor, NTIA will consider the planned
start date of the project; the
reasonableness of the project timeline
and associated milestones; whether the
applicant will be able to secure all
licenses, franchises, and regulatory
approvals required to complete the
project; whether the applicant will be
able to meet all environmental
requirements; and whether the required
contractors and vendors necessary to
implement the project are prepared to
enter into contracts as soon as the funds
are made available.
In view of the urgent need for
additional economic stimulus, however,
NTIA strongly encourages applicants to
fully complete their projects within the
two-year time period from the date of
issuance of the award.
2. Demonstration That Project Could
Not Be Implemented ‘‘But For’’ Federal
Grant Assistance
Grant applicants must provide
documentation that the project would
not have been implemented during the
grant period without Federal grant
assistance.41 This documentation may
consist of, but is not limited to, such
items as a denial of funding from a
public or private lending institution, a
current fiscal year budget that shows the
lack of available revenue options for
funding the project, or a business case
that demonstrates that the project would
not be economically feasible without
grant financing.
3. Additional Requirements Applicable
to Comprehensive Community
Infrastructure Applicants
a. Broadband Service
All CCI applicants must propose to
offer service meeting the definition of
broadband as defined in Section III.
b. Nondiscrimination and
Interconnection
All CCI applicants must commit to the
following Nondiscrimination and
Interconnection Obligations: 42
(i) Adhere to the principles contained in
the FCC’s Internet Policy Statement
(FCC 05–151, adopted August 5, 2005)
or any subsequent ruling or statement;
(ii) not favor any lawful Internet
applications and content over others;
(iii) display any network management
policies in a prominent location on the
41 See
supra note 23.
herein shall be construed to affect the
jurisdiction of the FCC with respect to such matters.
42 Nothing
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
service provider’s Web page and
provide notice to customers of changes
to these policies (awardees must
describe any business practices or
technical mechanisms they employ,
other than standard best efforts Internet
delivery, to allocate capacity;
differentiate among applications,
providers, or sources; limit usage; and
manage illegal or harmful content); (iv)
connect to the public Internet directly or
indirectly, such that the project is not an
entirely private closed network; and (v)
offer interconnection, where technically
feasible without exceeding current or
reasonably anticipated capacity
limitations, at reasonable rates and
terms to be negotiated with requesting
parties. This includes both the ability to
connect to the public Internet and
physical interconnection for the
exchange of traffic. Applicants must
disclose their proposed interconnection,
nondiscrimination, and network
management practices with the
application.
All these requirements shall be
subject to the needs of law enforcement
and reasonable network management.
Thus, awardees may employ generally
accepted technical measures to provide
acceptable service levels to all
customers, such as caching (including
content delivery networks) and
application-neutral bandwidth
allocation, as well as measures to
address spam, denial of service attacks,
illegal content, and other harmful
activities. In evaluating the
reasonableness of network management
techniques, NTIA will be guided by any
applicable rules or findings established
by the FCC, whether by rulemaking or
adjudication.
In addition to providing the required
connection to the Internet, awardees
may offer managed services, such as
telemedicine, public safety
communications, distance learning, and
virtual private networks, that use
private network connections for
enhanced quality of service rather than
traversing the public Internet.
An awardee may satisfy the
requirement for interconnection by
negotiating in good faith with all parties
making bona fide requests. The awardee
and requesting party may negotiate
terms such as business arrangements,
capacity limits, financial terms, and
technical conditions for
interconnection. If the awardee and
requesting party cannot reach
agreement, they may voluntarily seek an
interpretation by the FCC of any FCC
rules implicated in the dispute. If an
agreement cannot be reached within 90
days, the party requesting
interconnection may notify NTIA in
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
writing of the failure to reach
satisfactory terms with the awardee. The
90-day limit is to encourage the parties
to resolve differences through
negotiation.
With respect to non-discrimination,
those who believe an awardee has failed
to meet the non-discrimination
obligations should first seek action at
the FCC of any FCC rules implicated in
the dispute. If the FCC chooses to take
no action, those seeking recourse may
notify NTIA in writing about the alleged
failure to adhere to commitments of the
award.
These conditions apply to the
awardee and will remain in effect for
the life of the awardee’s Federally
funded facilities and equipment used in
the project. These conditions will not
apply to any existing network
arrangements or to non-awardees using
the network. Note, however, that the
awardee may negotiate contractual
covenants with other broadband service
providers engaged to deploy or operate
the network facilities and pass these
conditions through to such providers.
Awardees that fail to accept or comply
with the terms listed above may be
considered in default of their grant
agreements. NTIA may exercise all
available remedies in the event of a
default, including suspension of award
payments or termination of the award.43
c. Last Mile Coverage Obligation
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
i. Service Obligation
An applicant for a CCI project that
includes a Last Mile component must
identify the Last Mile service area(s)
selected for the project. There is a
presumption that the applicant will
provide service to the entire Last Mile
service area(s).
ii. Petition for Waiver
An applicant may petition for a
waiver of the Last Mile Coverage
Obligation if it provides a reasoned
explanation as to why providing service
or coverage for the entire Last Mile
service area is extremely burdensome
for the applicant. In considering
whether providing service or coverage is
extremely burdensome, the applicant
must explain whether there are any
legal, technical, or financial
impediments to covering each Census
block group or tract. Mere statements
regarding the burden to serve an area
without supporting documentation will
not be viewed favorably. The petition
for waiver and documentation must be
set forth clearly in the application.
43 Note that the changes made to this section from
the First NOFA are meant to clarify, and not
change, applicants’ obligations.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Applicants may be permitted to serve
less than an entire Census block group
or tract under certain conditions. For
example, an applicant might request to
be relieved of this requirement if the
Census block group or tract exceeds 100
square miles or more or is larger than
the applicant’s authorized operating
territory (e.g., it splits a rural incumbent
local exchange carrier’s (ILEC’s) study
area or exceeds the boundaries of a
wireless carrier’s licensed territory).
Where applicable, an applicant seeking
a waiver also should include
information regarding the characteristics
of the Last Mile service area (e.g., data
showing whether broadband services
already are available in the proposed
unserved territory by more than one
service provider or information
regarding terrain, acreage, population,
etc.) and costs (e.g., pro forma financial
projections or estimated applicant cost/
burden to provide broadband service to
the remainder of the area).
d. Announcement of Proposed Funded
Service Areas
In the interests of promoting
transparency and strengthening the
selection process, NTIA will post an
announcement identifying each CCI
application it has received, along with
a list of the Census block groups or
tracts that each infrastructure applicant
has proposed to serve through its
project, at https://
www.broadbandusa.gov. The posting of
this announcement will provide existing
broadband service providers with a 15day window voluntarily to submit to
NTIA information about the broadband
services they currently offer in their
respective service territories by Census
block group or tract. If an existing
broadband service provider submits a
response outside of the 15-day period,
NTIA may not consider this information
in its evaluation of an applicant’s Last
Mile or Middle Mile service area(s).
NTIA will consider the comments of
existing broadband service providers as
a factor in its evaluation of the
applicant’s Last Mile or Middle Mile
service area(s) 44 provided that they
include the following information, some
of which will be made public: (1) The
name of the company providing
information on its broadband service
offerings; (2) a summary describing the
information the provider has presented
to NTIA; (3) the number of households
and businesses that have access to
broadband service in the provider’s
service territory by Census block group
or tract; (4) the type of broadband
services the provider offers in its service
44 See
PO 00000
territory by Census block group or tract
and the technology used to provide
those services, including, for wireless
carriers, the spectrum that is used;
(5) the prices at which the broadband
services are offered; (6) the speed of the
broadband services that are offered; (7)
the number of subscribers that the
provider currently has for each of the
broadband services it offers in its
service territory by Census block group
or tract; and (8) optionally, a list of the
provider’s Points of Presence (POPs) in
or near Census block groups or tracts
listed by the announcement.
The information submitted by an
existing broadband service provider
relating to items (3) through (8)
enumerated above will be treated as
proprietary and confidential to the
extent permitted under applicable law.
The information described in items (1)
and (2) above, which includes the
identity of the company submitting
information and a summary of its
response, will be made publicly
available. NTIA will post at https://
www.broadbandusa.gov a list of the
Census block groups or tracts in which
existing broadband service providers
have indicated that they provide
broadband service. NTIA may consider
any information submitted by existing
broadband service providers as relevant
to its prioritization and review of CCI
applications and as part of its evaluation
of the merits of a highly qualified CCI
application. NTIA will contact the
applicant as necessary for additional
information to evaluate the unserved or
underserved status of its Last Mile or
Middle Mile service area(s), if
applicable, and may take other data,
such as existing State broadband maps
and FCC Form 477 data, into account
during this examination.
E. Funding Restrictions—Eligible and
Ineligible Costs
1. General
Grant funds that NTIA awards may
not necessarily be used to pay for all of
the costs that the grant recipient incurs
in carrying out the project. Specifically,
grant funds must be used only to pay for
eligible costs. Eligible costs are
consistent with the cost principles
identified in the applicable OMB
circulars 45 and in the grant program’s
45 For example, there is a set of Federal principles
for determining eligible or allowable costs.
Allowability of costs will be determined in
accordance with the cost principles applicable to
the entity incurring the costs. Thus, allowability of
costs incurred by State, local or Federallyrecognized Indian tribal governments is determined
in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular
A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
infra Section VII.A.1.
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3801
Continued
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3802
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
authorizing legislation. In addition,
costs must be reasonable, allocable,
necessary to the project, and conform to
GAAP. For CCI projects, eligible costs
are generally capital expenses, and not
operating expenses. An applicant
proposing to use any portion of the
grant funds for any ineligible cost will
be instructed to revise its proposed
budget to remove such costs prior to the
award of a grant.46 A more detailed
discussion of the eligible and ineligible
costs that are applicable to each BTOP
project category is set forth in the
following sections.
In general, a project will incur both
direct and indirect costs. Direct and
indirect costs may be reimbursed from
grant funds provided that they fall
within the approved eligible cost
categories discussed below.
as detailed in Sections V.E.3. and V.E.4.
will be considered eligible costs
provided they are included as a line
item in the applicant’s budget and the
applicant has established, or commits to
apply for, an approved indirect cost
rate. The process for establishing an
indirect cost rate with the DOC is
described in a document entitled
‘‘General Indirect Cost Rate Program
Guidelines for Grantee Organizations’’
and can be found on the Department of
Commerce Web site.47 Applicants that
do not have an approved indirect cost
rate will have 90 days from the award
start date to apply to have a rate
established.
submitted, with the exception of eligible
pre-application expenses;
iii. To fund an acquisition of an
affiliate, including the acquisition of the
stock of an affiliate;
iv. To fund the purchase or lease of
any vehicle other than those used
primarily in construction or system
improvements;
v. To fund the merger or
consolidation of entities; or
vi. To fund costs incurred in
acquiring spectrum as part of an FCC
auction or in a secondary market
acquisition.
2. Eligible and Ineligible Costs for BTOP
Comprehensive Community
Infrastructure Projects
a. Direct Costs of a BTOP Project
Direct costs are those that are directly
related and traceable to the cost of the
project being supported. Direct costs of
a project may be charged to the award
if they are allowable costs and are
included within approved budget
categories.
a. Eligible Costs for Comprehensive
Community Infrastructure Projects
Grant funds may be used to pay for
the following expenses:
i. To fund the construction or
improvement of all facilities required to
provide broadband service; 48
ii. To fund the cost of long-term leases
(for terms greater than one year) of
facilities required to provide broadband
service, including indefeasible right-ofuse (IRU) agreements;
iii. To fund reasonable preapplication expenses in an amount not
to exceed five percent of the award. Preapplication expenses, which include
expenses related to preparing an
application, may be reimbursed if they
are incurred after the publication date of
this NOFA and prior to the date of
issuance of the grant award from NTIA,
except that lobbying costs and
contingency fees are not reimbursable
from BTOP funds;
iv. To fund reasonable indirect costs
consistent with the principles outlined
in Section V.E.1. of this NOFA; and
v. Undertaking such other projects
and activities as the Assistant Secretary
finds to be consistent with the purposes
for which the Program is established.
a. Eligible Costs for Public Computer
Center Projects
Projects under this category are aimed
at expanding broadband access and
capacity at community anchor
institutions, organizations serving
vulnerable populations, or job-creating
strategic facilities located in State- or
Federally-designated economic
development areas as well as
stimulating broadband demand,
economic growth, and job creation.
Grantees may use BTOP funding to
expand public computer center capacity
by:
i. Acquiring broadband-related
equipment, instrumentation, networking
capability, hardware and software, and
digital network technology for
broadband services, including the
purchase of word processing software,
computer peripherals, such as mice and
printers, and computer maintenance
services and virus-protection software;
ii. Developing and providing training,
education, support, and awareness
programs or web-based resources,
including reasonable compensation for
qualified instructors, technicians,
managers, and other employees
essential for these types of programs;
iii. Facilitating access to broadband
services, including, but not limited to,
making public computer centers
accessible to the disabled;
iv. Installing or upgrading broadband
facilities on a one-time, capital
improvement, basis in order to increase
broadband capacity;
v. Constructing, acquiring, or leasing
a new facility, provided that the
applicant explains why it is necessary to
construct, acquire, or lease a new
facility to facilitate public access to
broadband services or expand computer
center capacity;
vi. Funding reasonable indirect costs
consistent with the principles outlined
in Section V.E.1. of this NOFA;
vii. Undertaking such other projects
and activities as the Assistant Secretary
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
b. Indirect Costs of a BTOP Project
NTIA has the discretion to consider
indirect costs as eligible expenses under
BTOP. For CCI projects, reasonable
indirect costs associated with the
construction, deployment, or
installation of facilities and equipment
used to provide broadband service as
described in Section V.E.2. will be
considered eligible provided that they
are included as a line item in the
applicant’s budget and the applicant has
established, or commits to apply for, an
approved indirect cost rate. For PCC and
SBA projects, reasonable indirect costs
associated with eligible project activities
Tribal Governments.’’ The allowability of costs
incurred by nonprofit organizations is determined
in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular
A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for Non-Profit
Organizations.’’ The allowability of costs incurred
by institutions of higher education is determined in
accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A–
21, ‘‘Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.’’
The allowability of costs incurred by hospitals is
determined in accordance with the provisions of
Appendix E of 45 CFR part 74, ‘‘Principles for
Determining Costs Applicable to Research and
Development under Grants and Contracts with
Hospitals.’’ The allowability of costs incurred by
commercial organizations and those nonprofit
organizations listed in Attachment C to Circular A–
122 is determined in accordance with the
provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) at 48 CFR part. 31. See 15 CFR 14.27 and
24.22 (governing the Department of Commerce’s
implementation of OMB requirements).
46 BTOP CCI applicants and PCC applicants will
be directed to revise SF–424A (for non-construction
projects) or SF–424C (for construction projects).
SBA applicants will be directed to revise SF–424A
(for non-construction projects).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
b. Ineligible Costs for Comprehensive
Community Infrastructure Projects
Grant funds may not be used for any
of the following purposes:
i. To fund operating expenses of the
applicant;
ii. To fund costs incurred prior to the
date on which the application is
47 See https://oam.ocs.doc.gov/docs/
DOC%20IDC%20Ext%20Policy.v6.doc.
48 These facilities and equipment may include, for
example, but are not limited to, the costs associated
with complying with all applicable legal
requirements, such as the Communications
Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). See
infra Section X.P.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3. Eligible and Ineligible Costs for
Public Computer Center Projects
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
finds to be consistent with the purposes
for which the Program is established;
and
viii. Paying for reasonable preapplication expenses in an amount not
to exceed five percent of the award. Preapplication expenses, which include
expenses related to preparing an
application, may be reimbursed if they
are incurred after the publication date of
this NOFA and prior to the date of
issuance of the grant award from NTIA,
except that lobbying costs and
contingency fees are not reimbursable
from BTOP funds.
While some of the costs associated
with the activities enumerated above
may be properly classified as operating
expenses, an applicant should describe
in its application how it intends to
cover the operating expenses of the
project after the grant period expires.
b. Ineligible Costs for Public Computer
Center Projects
BTOP grant funds may not be used to
fund purchases that are not used
predominantly for expanding public
access to broadband service or
enhancing broadband capacity at public
computer center locations.
4. Eligible and Ineligible Costs for
Sustainable Broadband Adoption
Projects
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
a. Eligible Costs for Sustainable
Broadband Adoption Projects
Projects under this category are aimed
at providing broadband education,
awareness, training, access, equipment,
and support in order to stimulate
sustainable adoption of broadband
services by individuals, households,
and community anchor institutions. In
this context, sustainable means
adoption (i.e., subscription to
broadband service) that the consumer or
institution can and will continue to pay
for after the award period. Grantees may
use BTOP funding for innovative
programs that encourage sustainable
adoption of broadband services by:
i. Acquiring broadband-related
equipment, instrumentation, networking
capability, hardware and software, and
digital network technology for
broadband services;
ii. Developing and providing training,
education, support, and awareness
programs, as well as web-based content
that is incidental to the program’s
purposes, and includes reasonable
compensation for qualified instructors
for these types of programs;
iii. Conducting broadband-related
public education, outreach, support,
and awareness campaigns;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
iv. Implementing programs to
facilitate greater access to broadband
service, devices, and equipment;
v. Funding reasonable indirect costs
consistent with the principles outlined
in Section V.E.1. of this NOFA;
vi. Undertaking such other projects
and activities as the Assistant Secretary
finds to be consistent with the purposes
for which the Program is established;
and
vii. Paying for reasonable preapplication expenses in an amount not
to exceed five percent of the award. Preapplication expenses, which include
expenses related to preparing an
application, may be reimbursed if they
are incurred after the publication date of
this NOFA and prior to the date of
issuance of the grant award from NTIA,
except that lobbying costs and
contingency fees are not reimbursable
from BTOP funds.
While some of the costs associated
with the activities enumerated above
may be properly classified as operating
expenses, an applicant should describe
in its application how it intends to
cover the operating expenses of the
project after the grant period expires, if
appropriate.
b. Ineligible Costs for Sustainable
Broadband Adoption Projects
BTOP grant funds may not be used for
expenses or purchases that are not used
predominantly for the provision of
broadband education, awareness,
training, access, equipment, and
support. Additionally, costs associated
with constructing or leasing broadband
facilities and infrastructure are not
eligible.
F. Use of Program Income
Grantees are required to account for
any Program income directly generated
by projects financed in whole or in part
with Federal funds. Given the Recovery
Act’s objectives to spur job creation and
stimulate long-term economic growth
and opportunity, projects funded by
BTOP grants are expected to
demonstrate convincingly the ability to
be sustained beyond the funding period.
While grant funds are intended to cover
the capital costs of a project as part of
the Recovery Act’s effort to stimulate
the economy, grant recipients for all
grant programs are expected to present
projects that will sustain long-term
growth and viability.
Any Program income generated by a
project funded by BTOP during the
grant period shall be retained by the
grant recipient and shall be used in one
or more of the following ways: (1)
Added to the funds committed to the
project by NTIA and the recipient to
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3803
conduct additional activities that will
further eligible project objectives,
including (a) reinvestment in project
facilities, (b) funding BTOP compliance
costs, and (c) paying operating expenses
of the project; or (2) used to finance the
non-Federal share of the project.49
Program income means gross income
earned by the recipient that is either
directly generated by a supported
activity or earned as a result of the
award during the funding period.50
Grant recipients shall have no obligation
to the Federal government regarding
Program income earned after the end of
the project period.51 However, the
Federal government retains an interest
in property in the event that it is sold,
consistent with the guidance outlined in
Section IX.C. of this NOFA and in
applicable DOC regulations.52
VI. Application and Submission
Information
A. Request for Application Package
Complete application packages,
including required Federal forms and
instructions, will be available at https://
www.broadbandusa.gov. Additional
information for BTOP can be found in
the Application Guidelines at https://
www.broadbandusa.gov. This Web site
will be updated regularly.
B. Registration
1. Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
All applicants are required to have a
current registration in the CCR database
prior to receiving an award. Online CCR
registration is available at https://
www.ccr.gov/StartRegistration.aspx.
Applicants without a current CCR are
encouraged to register as soon as
possible after the release of this
NOFA.53
49 15
CFR 14.24(b), 24.25(g).
CFR 14.2(aa), 24.25(b). Program income
includes, among other things, income from fees for
services performed, from the use or rental of real
or personal property acquired with grant funds, and
from the sale of commodities or items fabricated
under a grant agreement. 15 CFR 14.2(aa), 24.25(a).
In general, costs incident to the generation of
program income may be deducted from gross
income to determine program income, provided
these costs have not been charged to the award. 15
CFR 14.25(f), 24.25(c).
51 15 CFR 14.25(h), 24.25(h).
52 See, e.g., 2 CFR 215.24; 15 CFR 14.24, 24.25.
53 ‘‘To enable timeliness of awards, agencies
should engage in aggressive outreach to potential
applicants to begin application planning activities,
including the process of Central Contractor
Registration (CCR) and obtaining a Dun and
Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number.’’ Updating Implementing Guidance for the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(OMB M–09–15 April 3, 2009), available at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/
memoranda_fy2009/m09-15.pdf.
50 15
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3804
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
2. DUNS Number
All applicants should obtain a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number as
soon as possible after the release of this
NOFA.54 Applicants can receive a
DUNS number at no cost by calling the
dedicated toll-free DUNS number
request line at 1–866–705–5711 or via
the Internet at https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com.
C. Choosing the Proper Agency and
Category for an Application
1. Broadband Infrastructure
a. Choosing BIP or BTOP
Applicants that are eligible for both
BIP and BTOP have the option to apply
to either agency for funding for a
project. However, applicants should
apply to only one agency for a given
project. NTIA strongly recommends that
applicants that are current RUS loan or
grant recipients, as well as any
applicant whose project is for a Last
Mile area that is at least 75 percent
rural, should apply to BIP for funding.
This recommendation is necessary to
improve the efficiency of both BIP and
BTOP and to leverage the core expertise
of the agencies. The agencies will
coordinate to identify potential service
area overlaps, and will resolve such
conflicts in the manner that best
satisfies the statutory objectives of both
programs.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
b. Transferability
Under this NOFA, the Assistant
Secretary may refer to RUS any CCI
application that NTIA has determined
not to fund but that may be consistent
with BIP requirements.
c. Comprehensive Community
Infrastructure
Applications for CCI projects should
provide a broadband infrastructure
solution that addresses the major needs
of communities the project intends to
serve. Priority will be given to projects
that include a Middle Mile component.
The project should meet the significant
needs of the community, which in the
first instance should include providing
broadband service to community anchor
institutions, such as community
colleges, schools, libraries, medical and
healthcare providers, community
support organizations, and public safety
entities. CCI projects should be
technically feasible, sustainable, and
scalable, and address BTOP’s priority
needs, including offering substantial
economic, educational, healthcare, and
public safety benefits relative to the
54 Id.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
costs of providing service. NTIA will
give strong preference to CCI
applications that satisfy each of the
priorities set forth in Section II.B.
To the extent that a CCI project
contains a Last Mile component in rural
areas, the additional costs of offering
service to residential consumers and
non-community anchor institutions may
not exceed more than 20 percent of the
total eligible costs of the project.
Additionally, the applicant must
demonstrate the cost reasonableness and
effectiveness of the Last Mile
component of its project. Specifically,
applicants must ensure that this aspect
of the proposal yields total eligible
project costs that are less than $10,000
per household or per subscriber, unless
the applicant can demonstrate why it
should be permitted to exceed this
ceiling. NTIA will look more favorably
upon applications with lower costs per
household or per subscriber.
2. Public Computer Centers
Applications for PCC projects must
expand public computer center
capacity, including at community
colleges and public libraries.55 They
must provide broadband access or
improve broadband access to the general
public or a specific vulnerable
population, such as low-income,
unemployed, aged, children, minorities,
and people with disabilities. Projects
must create or expand a public
computer center meeting a specific
public need for broadband service,
including, but not limited to, education,
employment, economic development,
and enhanced service for healthcare
delivery, children, and vulnerable
populations. As described below, NTIA
will consider information related to the
demographics, size, and scope of the
populations to be served, as well as the
capacity of and the training provided by
the proposed centers.
3. Sustainable Broadband Adoption
Applications for SBA projects should
demonstrate a sustainable increase in
demand for and subscribership to
broadband services. Projects should
meet a specific public need for
broadband service, including, but not
limited to, education, employment,
economic development, and enhanced
service for healthcare delivery, children,
and vulnerable populations. Projects
should describe the barriers to adoption
in a given area, especially among
vulnerable populations, and propose an
innovative and persuasive solution to
achieve increased adoption. Applicants
might show how variations on one or
55 Recovery
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Act Tit. I, 123 Stat. at 128.
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
more proven demand stimulation
strategies—such as awareness-building,
development of relevant content, and
demand aggregation—would promote
sustainable adoption. NTIA expects a
high degree of verification that will
demonstrate the effectiveness of various
approaches to building sustainable
broadband adoption, including market
research and surveys.
D. Contents of the Application
1. Comprehensive Community
Infrastructure Applications
A complete CCI application will
include the elements listed below. As
required by the Recovery Act, NTIA is
required to make certain information
about applications available in a
publicly accessible database.56 Thus,
NTIA will publicly display application
elements containing such information
on the applicant database at https://
www.broadbandusa.gov. See Section
X.J. for a discussion of NTIA’s treatment
of confidential materials.
The following application elements
will be publicly displayed on the
applicant database:
a. The identity of the applicant and
general applicant and project
information;
b. An executive summary of the
project;
c. Information regarding the proposed
funded service area; and
d. The Federal grant request and cost
match.
The following elements will not be
included in the publicly accessible
applicant database:
a. A description of the applicant’s
nondiscrimination, interconnection, and
network management plans;
b. Details on local community
involvement and partnerships with
government, community, and
community anchor institutions, and
involvement of socially and
economically disadvantaged small
business concerns (SDB) as defined in
Section III of this NOFA;
c. A description of how the applicant
will advance the objectives of the
Recovery Act, as well as the specific
objectives of BTOP;
d. A description of the proposed
service offerings, including the pricing
of the services and information on
available services in the area;
56 Specifically, NTIA is required to create an
application database that includes at least a list of
each entity that has applied for a BTOP grant, a
description of each application, and the status of
each application. Recovery Act sec. 6001(i)(5), 123
Stat. at 515. After award, NTIA is required to make
certain additional information available about the
grants (e.g., the name of each entity receiving funds,
the purpose for which the entity is receiving funds,
and the quarterly reports). Id.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
e. Technical details of the proposed
project;
f. A timeline for the implementation
of the project, including key milestones
for implementation of the project,
preparations, and risk factors;
g. Information regarding the
organization’s capacity and readiness;
h. Details on the project budget and
funding, including the level of need for
Federal funding, details on other
Federal funding received by the
applicant, and information regarding
matching funds;
i. Pro forma financial analysis related
to the sustainability of the project across
an eight-year forecast period;
j. Completion of the Environmental
Questionnaire; and
k. The following supplemental
attachments as applicable:
i. Historical financial statements and
Certified Public Accountant (CPA)
audits if applicable;
ii. Proposed service offerings;
iii. Competitor data;
iv. Network diagram and system
design;
v. Maps of the proposed service areas;
vi. Build out timeline;
vii. Management team resumes and
organization chart;
viii. List of community anchor
institutions;
ix. Governance and key partnerships;
x. Pro forma financial projections and
subscriber estimates; and
xi. Authorized Organization
Representation and Compliance and
Assurance Certification.
2. Public Computer Centers
Applications
A complete PCC application will
include the elements listed below. As
noted above, NTIA is required by the
Recovery Act to make certain
information about applications available
in a publicly accessible database. Thus,
NTIA will publicly display application
elements containing such information
on the applicant database at https://
www.broadbandusa.gov. See Section
X.J. for a discussion of NTIA’s treatment
of confidential materials.
The following application elements
will be publicly displayed on the
applicant database:
a. The identity of the applicant and
general applicant and project
information;
b. An executive summary of the
project; and
c. The Federal grant request and cost
match.
The following elements will not be
included in the publicly accessible
applicant database:
a. A description of how the applicant
will advance the objectives of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Recovery Act, as well as the specific
objectives of BTOP;
b. A summary of the viability of the
project;
c. Proposed budget and sustainability
information;
d. Completion of an environmental
checklist or the Environmental
Questionnaire; and
e. The following supplemental
attachments:
i. Governance and key partnerships;
ii. Historical financial statements, as
applicable;
iii. Public center detail;
iv. Management team resumes and
organization chart;
v. SF–424 budget;
vi. Detailed budget; and
vii. Authorized Organization
Representative and Compliance and
Assurance Certification.
3. Sustainable Broadband Adoption
Applications
A complete SBA application will
include the elements listed below. As
noted above, NTIA is required by the
Recovery Act to make certain
information about applications available
in a publicly accessible database. Thus,
NTIA will publicly display application
elements containing such information
on the applicant database at https://
www.broadbandusa.gov. See Section
X.J. for a discussion of NTIA’s treatment
of confidential materials.
The following elements will be
publicly displayed on the applicant
database:
a. The identity of the applicant and
general applicant and project
information;
b. An executive summary of the
project; and
c. The Federal grant request and cost
match.
The following elements will not be
included in the publicly accessible
applicant database:
a. A description of how the applicant
will advance the objectives of the
Recovery Act, as well as the specific
objectives of BTOP;
b. A summary of the viability of the
project;
c. Proposed budget and sustainability
information;
d. Completion of an environmental
checklist and applicable certifications;
and
e. The following supplemental
attachments:
i. Governance and key partnerships;
ii. Historical financial statements, as
applicable;
iii. Management team resumes and
organization chart;
iv. SF–424 budget;
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3805
v. Detailed budget; and
vi. Authorized Organization
Representative and Compliance and
Assurance Certification.
4. Supplementary Information Requests
for Due Diligence
As discussed in Section II.C. above,
those applications that are considered to
be most highly qualified (i.e., receiving
the highest scores) will advance to due
diligence and will be processed with
priority given to projects that best
conform with the statutory purposes
and program priorities described in
Section II. In due diligence, applicants
may be asked to submit additional
information, as appropriate, to clarify or
to further substantiate the
representations made in their
application and allow Federal staff to
evaluate fully the proposed project with
respect to the eligibility factors, general
Program requirements, evaluation
criteria, and selection factors specified
in this NOFA. Due diligence applies to
all three categories of projects.
E. Filing Instructions
Electronic submissions of
applications will allow for the
expeditious review of an applicant’s
proposal consistent with the goals of the
Recovery Act. As a result, all applicants
are required to submit their applications
electronically at https://
applyonline.broadbandusa.gov. The
electronic application system will
provide a date-and-time-stamped
confirmation number that will serve as
proof of submission. Please note that
applications will not be accepted via
paper, facsimile machine transmission,
electronic mail, or other media format.
Applicants, however, may request a
waiver of these filing instructions
pursuant to Section X.N. of this NOFA.
F. Submission Dates and Times
All applications for funding BTOP
projects must be submitted between
February 16, 2010, at 8 a.m. Eastern
Standard Time (EST) and March 15,
2010, at 5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time
(EDT).
G. Authorization
As required by Section IX.C.5.a. of
this NOFA, all applicants will be
required to submit a certification by an
Authorized Organization Representative
at the time the application is submitted
for filing.
H. Material Representations
The application, including all
certifications and assurances, and all
forms submitted as part of the
application will be treated as a material
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3806
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
representation of fact upon which NTIA
will rely in awarding grants.
I. Material Revisions
An applicant shall not be permitted to
make any material revision to its
application after the submission
deadline. NTIA may request or accept
clarifications, revisions or submissions
for completeness that are non-material.
VII. Application Review Information
A. Evaluation Criteria
The evaluation criteria used by expert
reviewers to review and analyze BTOP
applications are grouped into four
categories: (1) Project Purpose; (2)
Project Benefits; (3) Project Viability;
and (4) Project Budget and
Sustainability. Each application will be
evaluated against the following
objective criteria, and not against other
applications.
1. Comprehensive Community
Infrastructure
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
a. Project Purpose (20 Points)
i. Fit with Statutory Purposes.
Applications will be evaluated with
respect to each of BTOP’s statutory
purposes.57 Reviewers will consider,
relative to each purpose, whether the
applicant is addressing a compelling
problem of the sort that the statute is
intended to resolve, whether the
applicant has offered an effective
solution to that problem, and whether
the proposed solution is of broad
significance and includes developments
that can be replicated to improve future
projects. Additional consideration also
will be given to applicants that address
more than one statutory purpose and
project category (e.g., CCI, PCC, or SBA)
in a convincing manner. Reviewers also
will consider the ability of the project to
enhance broadband service for
healthcare delivery, education, and
children as contemplated by the
Recovery Act.58
ii. Fit with BTOP Priorities.
Applications will be evaluated with
respect to each of the BTOP Priorities
and factors set forth in Section II.B.
Reviewers will consider the priorities
assigned for CCI projects, and additional
57 See Recovery Act sec. 6001(b), 123 Stat. at 512–
13 (stating the purposes of the program are to
provide broadband access to unserved areas; to
provide improved broadband access to underserved
areas; to provide broadband access, education, and
support to community anchor institutions, or
organizations and agencies serving vulnerable
populations, or job-creating strategic facilities
located in State- or Federally-designated economic
development areas; to improve access to, and use
of, broadband service by public safety agencies; and
to stimulate the demand for broadband, economic
growth, and job creation).
58 See id. sec. 6001(h)(2)(C), 123 Stat. at 515.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
consideration will be given for projects
that satisfy more priorities. Additional
consideration will be given to
applicants satisfying the factors used to
assess whether the application meets
Program objectives.
iii. Potential for Job Creation. The
application will be scored on the
project’s potential to create jobs,
particularly jobs created directly by the
project. Reviewers will assess the
methodology used to calculate job
estimates, the number and quality of the
jobs created, and how the project
balances job creation with cost
efficiency.
iv. Recovery Act and Other
Governmental Collaboration. Applicants
will be evaluated on their collaboration
with Recovery Act or other State or
Federal development programs that
leverage the impact of the proposed
project. Examples include the
Department of Energy’s Smart Grid
Investment Program, the Department of
Health and Human Services’ Beacon
Community Cooperative Agreement
Program, the Department of Housing
and Urban Development’s Public
Housing Capital Fund, the Department
of Transportation’s Capital Assistance
for High Speed Rail Corridors and
Intercity Passenger Service program,
and other investments where
collaboration would lead to greater
project efficiencies. In each case, the
applicant must convincingly
demonstrate that these leveraging efforts
are substantive and meaningful.
v. Indian Tribes and Socially and
Economically Disadvantaged Small
Businesses. Reviewers will grant
consideration to applicants that are
Indian tribes or that certify that they
meet the statutory definition of a
socially and economically
disadvantaged small business concern
(as modified by the Small Business
Administration’s approval of NTIA’s
request to adopt an alternative small
business concern size standard for use
in BTOP), or that have established
agreements to partner or contract with
Indian tribes or socially and
economically disadvantaged
businesses.59
b. Project Benefits (20 Points)
i. Level of Need in the Proposed
Funded Service Area. Applications will
be scored on the level of need for the
proposed network in the proposed
funded service area. Reviewers will
consider whether there are service
59 15 U.S.C. 637(a)(4) (as modified by the Small
Business Administration’s approval of NTIA’s
request to adopt an alternative small business
concern size standard for use in BTOP).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
providers already present in all or part
of the area, as well as the pricing,
coverage, and available capacity of those
providers. Reviewers also will consider
what proportion of the projected end
users are located in unserved or
underserved areas and may take into
account any comments submitted by
existing broadband service providers in
response to the announcement
described in Section V.D.3.d. of this
NOFA in making this evaluation.
Reviewers may consider other details
that are pertinent to determining the
degree of need for the project in the
area(s) (e.g., unemployment rates or
median income levels). In addition,
reviewers also will consider applicants’
explanation of why their proposed
project is well-suited to address the
needs of the proposed funded service
area(s).
ii. Impact on the Proposed Funded
Service Area(s). Applications will be
scored on how great an impact they
would have on the proposed funded
service area(s). Reviewers will consider
the extent to which the proposed project
will comprehensively meet, whether
directly or indirectly, the key broadband
needs of the communities within the
proposed funded service area,
particularly the need for Middle Mile
capacity. This should include
consideration of services for the
community anchor institutions in the
area(s), and access, transport, and
wholesale services for other broadband
service providers. Reviewers should
give particular weight to services
provided to community anchor
institutions, especially those in
unserved and underserved areas, as well
as any community colleges within the
proposed funded service area, whether
or not they are located in unserved and
underserved areas. Reviewers may take
into account any comments submitted
by existing broadband service providers
in response to the announcement
described in Section V.D.3.d. of this
NOFA in making the evaluation of a
proposed funded service area as
unserved or underserved, as applicable.
Reviewers also should consider the
extent to which the project will provide,
directly or indirectly, residential and
business broadband services within the
proposed funded service area(s).
iii. Network Capacity and
Performance. Applicants will be
evaluated on the ability of the proposed
network to provide sufficient capacity,
as well as scalability, to meet the
comprehensive needs of the
communities in the proposed funded
service area(s). The Middle Mile
components of the network should
provide capacity sufficient to serve the
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
anticipated Last Mile networks,
community anchor institutions, and
public safety entities, and the number of
end users served by them, as projected
by the applicant, taking into
consideration the nature of the services
for which these institutions and end
users are likely to seek to utilize the
network. Applications that include Last
Mile components also will be evaluated
on the extent to which the advertised
speed for the network’s highest offered
speed tier exceeds the minimum speed
requirement for broadband service (768
kbps downstream and 200 kbps
upstream). Networks with higher enduser speeds will receive greater
consideration. Proposed networks with
high latency will be viewed
unfavorably. Applicants may gain
additional consideration if the applicant
can demonstrate a clear and affordable
upgrade path for the network.
iv. Affordability of Services Offered.
Projects will be evaluated on the pricing
of the services offered compared to
existing broadband services in the
proposed funded service area(s) or
based on nationwide averages.
Applicants should demonstrate that this
pricing is competitive and affordable to
their target markets. However, pricing
levels also should be reasonable and
market-based, so as to maximize the
efficient use of Federal grant funds.
v. Nondiscrimination,
Interconnection, and Choice of Provider.
Applications will be scored on the
extent to which the applicant commits
to exceeding the minimum requirements
for interconnection and
nondiscrimination established in
Section V.D.3. of this NOFA. Additional
consideration will be given for
displaying the network’s
nondiscrimination and interconnection
policies in a prominent location on the
service provider’s Web page, and
providing notice to customers of
changes to these policies. Additional
consideration will be given to
applicants that commit to offering
wholesale access to network elements
and project facilities at reasonable rates
and terms. Additional consideration
also will be given to applicants that
commit to binding private arbitration of
disputes concerning the awardees’
interconnection obligations as explained
in Section V.D.3. of this NOFA.
Reviewers also will consider whether
the application proposes to construct
infrastructure and implement a business
plan that would allow more than one
provider to serve end users in the
proposed funded service area(s).
Reviewers also may consider other
factors to assess the degree of openness
of the network.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
c. Project Viability (30 Points)
i. Technical Feasibility of the
Proposed Project. Applications will be
scored on the comprehensiveness and
appropriateness of the technical
solution and the clarity, level of detail,
coherence, and cost-effectiveness of the
system designs.
ii. Applicant’s Organizational
Capability. Reviewers will assess
whether the applicant has the
organizational capability necessary to
undertake and complete the project.
Reviewers will consider the years of
experience and expertise of the project
management team and the past track
record of the organization with projects
of a similar size and scope, as well as
the organization’s capacity and
readiness.
iii. Level of Community Involvement
in the Project. Reviewers will evaluate
linkages to unaffiliated organizations in
the project area (from the public, nonprofit, and private sectors), particularly
community anchor institutions and
public safety organizations, as an
ongoing and integral part of the project
planning and operation. Applicants
should demonstrate that each linkage is
substantial and meaningful.
d. Project Budget and Sustainability (30
Points)
i. Reasonableness of the Budget.
Reviewers will evaluate the
reasonableness of the budget based on
its clarity, level of detail,
comprehensiveness, appropriateness to
the proposed technical and
programmatic solutions, the
reasonableness of its costs, and whether
the allocation of funds is sufficient to
complete the tasks outlined in the
project plan. To the extent that a CCI
project includes a Last Mile component,
the cost per household or cost per
subscriber should not exceed $10,000.
Additional consideration will be given
to applicants that present cost per
household or cost per subscriber
proposals below the $10,000 maximum
based on a sliding scale.
ii. Sustainability of the Project.
Applicants must convincingly
demonstrate the ability of the project to
be sustained beyond the funding period.
Reviewers will consider business plans,
market projections, third-party funding
commitments, and other data as may be
appropriate to the nature of the
applicant and the proposed project.
iii. Leverage of Outside Resources.
Reviewers will consider whether the
applicant has demonstrated the ability
to provide, from non-Federal sources,
funds required to meet or exceed the 20
percent matching funds requirement
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3807
unless a waiver of that requirement has
been requested. Additional
consideration will be given to
applicants that provide a cost match of
30 percent or greater of the total eligible
costs of a project. Reviewers also will
evaluate whether the applicant has
tailored the proportion of Federal
funding to the level that is necessary to
make the project economically feasible
and sustainable. Reviewers will give
additional consideration to proposals
that provide cash matches. For purposes
of this evaluation, applicants that have
received a full or partial waiver of the
cost-matching requirement will be
treated as having provided a 20 percent
non-cash match.
2. BTOP Public Computer Center
Projects
a. Project Purpose (20 Points)
i. Fit with Statutory Purposes.
Applications will be evaluated with
respect to each of BTOP’s statutory
purposes.60 Reviewers will consider,
relative to each purpose, whether the
applicant is addressing a compelling
problem of the sort that the statute is
intended to resolve, whether the
applicant has offered an effective
solution to that problem, and whether
the proposed solution is of broad
significance and includes developments
that can be replicated to improve future
projects. Additional consideration also
will be given to applicants that address
more than one statutory purpose and
project category (e.g., CCI, PCC, or SBA)
in a convincing manner. Reviewers also
will consider the ability of the project to
enhance broadband service for
healthcare delivery, education, and
children as contemplated by the
Recovery Act.61
ii. Potential for Job Creation. The
application will be scored on the
project’s potential to create jobs,
particularly for jobs created directly by
the project. Reviewers will assess the
methodology used to calculate job
estimates, the number and quality of the
jobs created, and how the project
balances job creation with cost
efficiency.
60 See Recovery Act sec. 6001(b), 123 Stat. at 512–
13 (stating the purposes of the program are to
provide broadband access to unserved areas; to
provide improved broadband access to underserved
areas; to provide broadband access, education, and
support to community anchor institutions, or
organizations and agencies serving vulnerable
populations, or job-creating strategic facilities
located in State- or Federally-designated economic
development areas; to improve access to, and use
of, broadband service by public safety agencies; and
to stimulate the demand for broadband, economic
growth, and job creation).
61 See id. sec. 6001(h)(2)(C), 123 Stat. at 515.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3808
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
iii. Recovery Act and Other
Governmental Collaboration. Applicants
will be evaluated on their collaboration
with Recovery Act or other State or
Federal development programs that
leverage the impact of the proposed
project. Examples include the
Department of Energy’s Smart Grid
Investment Program, the Department of
Housing and Urban Development’s
Public Housing Capital Fund, and other
investments where collaboration would
lead to greater project efficiencies. In
each case, the applicant must
convincingly demonstrate that these
leveraging efforts are substantive and
meaningful.
iv. Indian Tribes and Socially and
Economically Disadvantaged Small
Businesses. Reviewers will grant
consideration to applicants that are
Indian tribes or certify that they meet
the statutory definition of a socially and
economically disadvantaged small
business concern (as modified by the
Small Business Administration’s
approval of NTIA’s request to adopt an
alternative small business concern size
standard for use in BTOP), or that have
established agreements in principle to
partner or contract with Indian tribes or
such socially and economically
disadvantaged businesses.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
b. Project Benefits (20 Points)
i. Availability to the Public.
Applications will be scored on the
availability of the computer center to
the public. Reviewers will consider the
capacity of the computer center, its
hours of availability, any membership or
usage fees charged, restrictions on
usage, the proportionality of the
computer center’s capacity and hours of
availability to the population the
applicant proposes to serve, public
outreach, and the computer center’s
accessibility to persons with disabilities,
accounting for both the physical
accessibility of the facility and the
accessibility of the computer equipment
and software.
ii. Training and Educational
Programs Offered. Applicants will be
scored on the availability, accessibility,
and quality of training and educational
programs offered through the computer
center. Reviewers will consider the
degree to which the programs meet the
documented needs of the community.
iii. Availability and Qualifications of
Consulting and Teaching Staff.
Applications will be evaluated on the
strength of the consulting and teaching
staff at the computer center. Reviewers
will consider the qualifications and
training required of such staff as well as
whether the number of available staff is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
sufficient for the capacity of the
computer center.
iv. Projects in Community Colleges.
Reviewers will grant consideration to
applicants that will create computer
centers in community colleges,
especially where the applicant can
demonstrate that such computer centers
will deliver substantive benefits to the
college’s core mission.
c. Project Viability (30 Points)
i. Technical Feasibility of the
Proposed Project. Applications will be
scored on the comprehensiveness and
appropriateness of the technical
solution and the clarity, level of detail,
and coherence of the system designs.
ii. Applicant’s Organizational
Capability. Reviewers will assess
whether the applicant has the
organizational capability necessary to
undertake and complete the project.
Reviewers will consider the years of
experience and expertise of the project
management team, and the past track
record of the organization with projects
of a similar size and scope, as well as
the organization’s capacity and
readiness.
iii. Level of Community Involvement
in the Project. Reviewers will evaluate
linkages to unaffiliated organizations in
the project area (from the public,
nonprofit, and private sectors),
particularly community anchor
institutions and public safety
organizations, as an ongoing and
integral part of the project planning and
operation. Applicants should
demonstrate that each linkage is
substantial and meaningful.
d. Project Budget and Sustainability (30
Points)
i. Reasonableness of the Budget.
Reviewers will evaluate the
reasonableness of the budget based on
its clarity, level of detail,
comprehensiveness, appropriateness to
the proposed technical and
programmatic solutions, the
reasonableness of its costs, and whether
the allocation of funds is sufficient to
complete the tasks outlined in the
project plan.
ii. Sustainability of the Project.
Applicants must convincingly
demonstrate the ability of the project to
be sustained beyond the funding period.
Reviewers will consider past
performance of the applicant,
community and institutional support for
the project, third-party funding
commitments, and other data as may be
appropriate to the nature of the
applicant and the proposed project.
iii. Leverage of Outside Resources.
Reviewers will consider whether the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
applicant has demonstrated the ability
to provide, from non-Federal sources,
funds required to meet or exceed the 20
percent matching funds requirement
unless a waiver of that requirement has
been requested. Reviewers also will give
additional consideration to proposals
that provide cash matches. For purposes
of this evaluation, applicants that have
received a full or partial waiver of the
cost-matching requirement will be
treated as having provided a 20 percent
non-cash match.
3. BTOP Sustainable Broadband
Adoption Projects
a. Project Purpose (20 Points)
i. Fit with Statutory Purposes.
Applications will be evaluated with
respect to each of BTOP’s statutory
purposes.62 Reviewers will consider,
relative to each purpose, whether the
applicant is addressing a compelling
problem of the sort that the statute is
intended to resolve, whether the
applicant has offered an effective
solution to that problem, and whether
the proposed solution is of broad
significance and includes developments
that can be replicated to improve future
projects. Additional consideration also
will be given to applicants that address
more than one statutory purpose and
project category (e.g., CCI, PCC, or SBA)
in a convincing manner. Reviewers will
also consider the ability of the project to
enhance broadband service for
healthcare delivery, education, and
children as contemplated by the
Recovery Act.63
ii. Potential for Job Creation. The
application will be scored on the
project’s potential to create jobs,
particularly jobs created directly by the
project. Reviewers will assess the
methodology used to calculate job
estimates, the number and quality of the
jobs created, and how the project
balances job creation with cost
efficiency.
iii. Recovery Act and Other
Governmental Collaboration. Applicants
will be evaluated on their collaboration
with Recovery Act or other State or
Federal development programs that
leverage the impact of the proposed
62 See Recovery Act sec. 6001(b), 123 Stat. at 512–
13 (stating the purposes of the program are to
provide broadband access to unserved areas; to
provide improved broadband access to underserved
areas; to provide broadband access, education, and
support to community anchor institutions, or
organizations and agencies serving vulnerable
populations, or job-creating strategic facilities
located in State- or Federally-designated economic
development areas; to improve access to, and use
of, broadband service by public safety agencies; and
to stimulate the demand for broadband, economic
growth, and job creation).
63 See id. sec. 6001(h)(2)(C), 123 Stat. at 515.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
project. Examples include the
Department of Energy’s Smart Grid
Investment Program, the Department of
Housing and Urban Development’s
Public Housing Capital Fund, the
Department of Transportation’s Capital
Assistance for High Speed Rail
Corridors and Intercity Passenger
Service program, and other investments
where collaboration would lead to
greater project efficiencies. In each case,
the applicant must convincingly
demonstrate that these leveraging efforts
are substantive and meaningful.
iv. Indian Tribes and Socially and
Economically Disadvantaged Small
Businesses. Reviewers will grant
consideration to applicants that are
Indian tribes or that certify that they
meet the statutory definition of a
socially and economically
disadvantaged small business concern
(as modified by the Small Business
Administration’s approval of NTIA’s
request to adopt an alternative small
business concern size standard for use
in BTOP), or that have established
agreements in principle to partner or
contract with Indian tribes or such
socially and economically
disadvantaged businesses.
b. Project Benefits (20 Points)
i. Number of New Subscribers.
Applications will be scored on the
number of new broadband subscribers
and other regular users the project will
generate. Reviewers will take into
consideration both the overall number
of new subscribers and users and the
proportion that these new subscribers
and users represent of the number of
non-subscribers and non-users in the
relevant area. Reviewers also will
consider the applicant’s plan to
effectively track and measure the
benefits generated by the project.
ii. Cost Per New User. Applications
will be evaluated on the costeffectiveness of the program. Reviewers
will consider the cost per projected new
subscriber or other regular user, taking
into account the applicant’s explanation
of why the approach selected is a costeffective approach given the particular
circumstances of the project.
iii. Innovation. Applications will be
evaluated on the degree to which the
project demonstrates replicable new
ideas, approaches, and methods to
encourage sustainable broadband
adoption.
iv. Support for Vulnerable
Populations. Reviewers will evaluate
applications on their level of support for
vulnerable populations. In this regard,
reviewers will assess both the numbers
of people in vulnerable populations
likely to be affected by the project as
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
well as the steps that the applicant
plans to take to engage and address the
specific needs of those populations.
c. Project Viability (30 Points)
i. Operational Feasibility of the
Proposed Project. Reviewers will assess
the operational details of the project.
Applicants will be scored on the clarity
and detail of their project plan and how
convincing the rationale behind the
plan is.
ii. Applicant’s Organizational
Capability. Reviewers will assess
whether the applicant has the
organizational capability necessary to
undertake and complete the project.
Reviewers will consider the years of
experience and expertise of the project
management team and the past track
record of the organization with projects
of a similar size and scope, as well as
the organization’s capacity and
readiness.
iii. Level of Community Involvement
in the Project. Reviewers will evaluate
linkages to unaffiliated organizations in
the project area (from the public, nonprofit, and private sectors), particularly
community anchor institutions and
public safety organizations, as an
ongoing and integral part of the project
planning and operation. Applicants
should demonstrate that each linkage is
substantial and meaningful.
d. Project Budget and Sustainability (30
Points)
i. Reasonableness of the Budget.
Reviewers will evaluate the
reasonableness of the budget based on
its clarity, level of detail,
comprehensiveness, appropriateness to
the proposed technical and
programmatic solutions, the
reasonableness of its costs, and whether
the allocation of funds is sufficient to
complete the tasks outlined in the
project plan.
ii. Sustainability of the Project
Impact. Reviewers will consider
whether the increases in broadband
adoption rates in the project area caused
by the project will be sustained beyond
the conclusion of the project.
iii. Leverage of Outside Resources.
Reviewers will consider whether the
applicant has demonstrated the ability
to provide, from non-Federal sources,
funds required to meet or exceed the 20
percent matching funds requirement
unless a waiver of that requirement has
been requested. Reviewers also will give
additional consideration to proposals
that provide cash matches. For purposes
of this evaluation, applicants that have
received a full or partial waiver of the
cost-matching requirement will be
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3809
treated as having provided a 20 percent
non-cash match.
VIII. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
NTIA intends to announce BTOP
Round 2 awards on a rolling basis
starting in June 2010. All grants will be
awarded by September 30, 2010.
IX. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
Applicants will be notified in writing
by the Department of Commerce’s (DOC)
Grants Officer if their application is
selected for an award. The DOC’s Grants
Officer notification will come from
either the National Institute for
Standards and Technology (NIST) or the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), both of which
function as Grants Offices for the BTOP
Program. If the application is selected
for funding, the DOC’s Grants Officer
will issue the grant award (Form CD–
450), which is the authorizing financial
assistance award document, either
electronically if from NOAA or in
writing if from NIST. By signing the
Form CD–450, the awardee agrees to
comply with all award provisions,
terms, and conditions. The awardee
must sign and return the Form CD–450
to NIST or submit the executed form to
NOAA by electronic means without
modification within 30 days of receipt.
If an applicant is awarded funding,
neither the DOC nor NTIA is under any
obligation to provide any additional
future funding in connection with that
award or to make any future award(s).
Amendment of an award or to extend
the period of performance is at the
discretion of the DOC and of NTIA.
B. Administrative Requirements
Administrative and national policy
requirements for BTOP grant funding,
inter alia, are contained in the PreAward Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements
(DOC Pre-Award Notification),64 as
amended. All BTOP applicants are
required to comply with all applicable
provisions set forth in the DOC PreAward Notification.
C. Award Terms and Conditions
1. Scope
Awardees and subrecipients are
required to comply with the obligations
set forth in the Recovery Act and the
requirements established herein. Any
obligation that applies to the awardee
64 The DOC Pre-Award Notification was
published in the Federal Register on February 11,
2008. 73 FR 7696.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3810
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
shall extend for the life of the awardfunded facilities.
audit of an award may be conducted at
any time.67
2. Sale or Lease of Project Assets
4. Broadband Data Collection
a. Restriction on Assets
The sale or lease of any portion of the
award-funded broadband facilities or
equipment during the life of the
facilities or equipment is prohibited,
except as provided herein. Nothing in
this section is meant to limit CCI
awardees from leasing facilities to
another service provider for the
provision of broadband services, nor is
this section meant to restrict a transfer
of control of the awardee.65 Awardees
are required to comply with all
applicable regulations regarding the
disposition of real property and
equipment.66
All CCI awardees that offer Internet
access service to the public for a fee
must agree to participate in the State
Broadband Data and Development Grant
Program pursuant to the BDIA and
Section 6001(l) of the Recovery Act.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
b. Petition for Waiver
NTIA will consider a petition for
waiver of the above restriction if: (a) The
transaction is for adequate
consideration; (b) the purchaser or
lessee agrees to fulfill the terms and
conditions relating to the project after
such sale or lease; and (c) the
transaction would be in the best
interests of those served by the project.
The petition for waiver may be
submitted at any time during the life of
the award-funded facilities and
equipment, and it must include
supporting documentation and
justification regarding why the petition
should be granted.
3. Access to Records for Audits, Site
Visits, Monitoring, and Law
Enforcement Purposes
The Inspector General of the DOC, or
any of his or her duly authorized
representatives, and NTIA
representatives, or any of their duly
authorized representatives, shall have
access to and the right to inspect the
broadband system and any other
property funded by the grant, any and
all books, records, accounts, invoices,
contracts, leases, payrolls, time sheets,
canceled checks, statements, and other
documents, papers, and records of the
parties to a grant, including their
subsidiaries, if any, whether written,
printed, recorded, produced, or
reproduced by any electronic,
mechanical, magnetic, or other process
or medium, in order to make audits,
inspections, site visits, excerpts,
transcripts, copies, or other
examinations as authorized by law. An
65 Note that certain equipment is exempt from
obligations to the Federal government and may be
used and sold at the awardee’s will. See 15 CFR
14.34(g), 24.32.
66 See, e.g., 15 CFR 14.32–14.34; 15 CFR 24.31–
24.32.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
5. Certifications
a. The applicant must certify that he
or she is the duly Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR) and
has been authorized to submit the
application on its behalf.
b. The AOR must certify that he or she
has examined the application, that all of
the information and responses in the
application, including certifications,
and forms submitted, all of which are
part of the grant application, are
material representations of fact and are
true and correct to the best of his or her
knowledge; that the entity(ies) that is
requesting grant funding pursuant to
this application as well as any
subgrantees and subcontractors will
comply with the terms, conditions,
purposes, and Federal requirements of
the grant program; that no kickbacks
were paid to anyone; and that false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statements or
claims on this application are grounds
for denial or termination of a grant
award, and/or possible punishment by a
fine or imprisonment as provided in 18
U.S.C. 1001 and civil violations of the
False Claims Act.
c. The AOR must certify that the
entity(ies) he or she represents have and
will comply with all applicable Federal,
State, and local laws, rules, regulations,
ordinances, codes, orders, and
programmatic rules and requirements
relating to the project. The AOR must
acknowledge that failure to do so may
result in rejection or deobligation of the
grant or loan award. The AOR must
acknowledge that failure to comply with
all Federal and program rules could
result in civil or criminal prosecution by
the appropriate law enforcement
authorities.
d. The AOR must certify that the
entity(ies) he or she represents has and
will comply with all applicable
administrative and Federal statutory,
regulatory, and policy requirements set
forth in the Department of Commerce
67 Note that Section 1515 of the Recovery Act also
authorizes the Inspector General to examine records
and interview officers and employees of the grantee
and other entities regarding the award of funds. See
Recovery Act sec. 1515, 123 Stat. at 289.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Pre-Award Notification; 68 the DOC
Financial Assistance Standard Terms
and Conditions; 69 the DOC American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act Award
Terms (April 9, 2009); 70 and any
Special Award Terms and Conditions
that are included by the Grants Officer
in the award.
e. The AOR must certify that any
funds awarded to the entity(ies) he or
she represents as a result of this
application will not: (a) Result in any
unjust enrichment as a result of support
for non-recurring costs through another
Federal program for service in the area
that would be served by the project
described in this application; (b)
duplicate any funds such entity(ies)
receive under Federal universal service
support programs administered by the
Universal Service Administration
Corporation (USAC); or (c) duplicate
any funds such entity(ies) receive
through grant or loan programs
administered by RUS.
f. The AOR must certify that the
entity(ies) he or she represent has
secured access to pay at least 20 percent
of the total project cost or has petitioned
the Assistant Secretary for a waiver of
the matching requirement.
D. Reporting Requirements
1. General Recovery Act Requirements
Any grant awarded under this NOFA
shall be subject to the applicable
statutes and regulations regarding
reporting on Recovery Act funds.71 If
Recovery Act funds are combined with
other funds to fund or complete projects
and activities, Recovery Act funds must
be accounted for separately from other
funds. Recipients of funds under this
NOFA also must comply with the
accounting requirements as established
or referred to in this NOFA. For a
complete list of the reporting
requirements, see https://
www.FederalReporting.gov.72
68 See Department of Commerce Pre-Award
Notification (Feb. 11, 2008) available at https://oam.
ocs.doc.gov/docs/GRANTS/GCA_manual.pdf.
69 See Department of Commerce Financial
Assistance Standard Terms and Conditions (Mar. 8,
2009) available at https://oamweb.osec.doc.gov/
docs/GRANTS/DOC%2OSTCsMAR08Rev.pdf.
70 See U.S. Department of Commerce American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act Award Terms (Apr.
9, 2009) available at https://oam..ocs..doc.gov/docs/
ARRA%20DOC%20Award%20Terms%20Final%
205-20-09PDF.doc.pdf.
71 See, e.g., Recovery Act sec. 1512(c), 123 Stat.
at 287; 2 CFR part 176; OMB, Interim Final
Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance, 74 FR
18449 (Apr. 23, 2009); Implementing Guidance for
Reports on Use of Funds Pursuant to the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (OMB M–
09–21 June 22, 2009), available at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/
memoranda_fy2009/m09-21.pdf.
72 See infra Section X.V.1.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
2. BTOP-Specific Reporting
Requirements
In addition to the general Recovery
Act reporting requirements, BTOP
award recipients also must report to
NTIA on the information requested
below.73 The information requested will
vary depending on the type of project
being funded. Pursuant to the Recovery
Act, NTIA will make these reports
available to the public.74
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
a. All BTOP Award Recipients
All BTOP award recipients must
report on:
i. The progress in achieving the
project goals, objectives, and milestones
as set forth in their applications;
ii. Expenditure of grant funds and the
amount of remaining grant funds; and
iii. The amount of non-Federal
investment being added to complete the
project.
If a recipient is permitted by NTIA to
complete its project after two years, then
it must specifically state in the
applicable quarter when it has met 67
percent of its milestones and received
67 percent of its award funds.75
Reaching these thresholds will indicate
that the recipient has ‘‘substantially
completed’’ its project consistent with
the Recovery Act.76
b. Comprehensive Community
Infrastructure Award Recipients
Recipients receiving CCI grants must
report on the following:
i. The terms of any interconnection
agreements entered into during the
reporting period;
ii. Any traffic exchange relationships
(e.g., peering) and terms;
iii. Any broadband equipment
purchases;
iv. The total and peak utilization of
access links;
v. The total and peak utilization of
interconnection links to other networks;
vi. Internet protocol address
utilization and IPv6 implementation;
vii. Any changes or updates to
network management practices;
viii. Any average end-user and Middle
Mile megabit per second increases;
ix. The total market potential for
households, businesses, and community
anchor institutions in the area served;
x. The number of households and
businesses passed, subscribing to
broadband service, subscribing to new
broadband service, and receiving
improved access;
xi. The number and type of
community anchor institutions passed,
73 See
id. sec. 6001(i)(1)–(2), 123 Stat. at 515.
sec. 6001(i)(1), 123 Stat. at 515.
75 See supra Section V.D.
76 Recovery Act sec. 6001(d)(3), 123 Stat. at 513.
74 Id.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
subscribing to broadband service,
subscribing to new broadband service,
and receiving improved access;
xii. The advertised and averaged
broadband speeds;
xiii. The number of existing network
miles deployed, new network miles
deployed, and new network miles
leased;
xiv. For projects with a Middle Mile
component, the ‘‘cost per mile,’’ ‘‘cost
per household,’’ and, if applicable, ‘‘cost
per tower’’ to offer broadband service;
xv. For projects with a Last Mile
component, the ‘‘cost per household’’
and ‘‘cost per subscriber’’ to offer
broadband service; and
xvi. The price of the broadband
services.
c. Public Computer Center Award
Recipients
Recipients receiving PCC grants must
report on the following:
i. The number of new and upgraded
public computer centers;
ii. The number of new and upgraded
workstations available to the public;
iii. The total hours of operation per
week that the public computer center(s)
is open;
iv. The speed of broadband to the
public computer center(s);
v. The primary uses of the public
computer center(s);
vi. The average number of users per
week in the public computer center(s);
vii. The total hours per week of
training provided at the public
computer center(s);
viii. The number and cost of any
broadband equipment deployed; and
ix. The total project cost per
workstation.
d. Sustainable Broadband Adoption
Award Recipients
Recipients receiving SBA grants must
report on the following:
i. The technology being fostered;
ii. Efforts to aggregate demand for
each location, including the role of the
local community;
iii. The increase in the number of
households, businesses, and community
anchor institutions subscribing to
broadband service, and the methodology
used to measure the increase;
iv. The number and type of awareness
campaigns provided, including the total
number of individuals reached;
v. The number and cost of any
broadband customer premises
equipment or end-user devices
deployed;
vi. The total market potential for
households, businesses, and community
anchor institutions in the area served;
and
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3811
vii. Other program elements as
proposed by the applicant and agreed to
by NTIA.
3. Reporting Deadlines
All reports are due ten days after the
quarter in which the award was issued
ends and, unless otherwise noted, each
quarter thereafter until a final report is
made at the end of three years or sooner
depending on when the project is
completed. The final report should
summarize the recipient’s quarterly
filings and State whether the project’s
goals have been satisfied. Pursuant to
OMB Guidelines, Recovery Act reports
should be submitted electronically to
https://www.FederalReporting.gov. The
BTOP-specific reports should be sent to
NTIA.
If the recipient fails to submit an
acceptable quarterly report or audited
financial statement within the
timeframe designated in the grant
award, NTIA may take appropriate
actions, including suspension of
payments, suspension of award, or
termination.77 Additional information
regarding reporting requirements will be
specified at the time the award is
issued.
X. Other Information
A. Funding Rounds
This is the second of two announced
funding rounds. NTIA does not
anticipate further funding rounds,
although it reserves the right to release
a subsequent NOFA to ensure that all
BTOP funds are awarded by September
30, 2010.
B. Discretionary Awards
The government is not obligated to
make any award as a result of this
announcement, and will fund only
projects that are deemed likely to
achieve the Program’s goals and for
which funds are available.
C. Third Party Beneficiaries
BTOP is a discretionary grant program
that is not intended to and does not
create any rights enforceable by third
party beneficiaries, except subrecipients or subcontractors.
D. Limitation on Expenditures
The Recovery Act imposes an
additional limitation on the use of funds
expended or obligated from
appropriations made pursuant to its
provisions. Specifically, for purposes of
this NOFA, funds appropriated or
otherwise made available under the
Recovery Act may not be used by any
State or local government, or any private
77 DOC
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
Grants Manual, ch. 11, sec. B.
22JAN2
3812
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
entity, for any casino or other gambling
establishment, aquarium, zoo, golf
course, or swimming pool.78
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
E. Recovery Act Logo
All projects that are funded by the
Recovery Act shall display signage that
features the Primary Emblem
throughout the construction phase. The
signage should be displayed in a
prominent location on site. Some
exclusions may apply. The Primary
Emblem should not be displayed at a
size less than six inches in diameter.
F. Environmental and National Historic
Preservation Requirements
Awarding agencies are required to
analyze the potential environmental
impacts, as required by the National
Environmental Protection Act (NEPA)
and the National Historic Preservation
Act (NHPA), for applicant proposals and
awardee projects seeking Recovery Act
funding.79 All CCI applicants and PCC
applicants with projects containing
construction and/or ground disturbing
activities are required to complete the
Environmental Questionnaire in the
application and to submit all other
required environmental documentation
as necessary. All PCC applicants with
projects that do not contain construction
and/or ground disturbing activities and
all SBA applicants are required to
complete the DOC Environmental
Checklist in the application.
It is the applicant’s responsibility to
obtain all necessary Federal, State, and
local governmental permits and
approvals necessary for the proposed
work to be conducted. Applicants are
expected to design their projects so that
they minimize the potential for adverse
impacts on the environment. Applicants
also will be required to cooperate with
NTIA in identifying feasible measures to
reduce or avoid any identified adverse
environmental impacts of their
proposed projects. The failure to do so
may be grounds for not making an
award. Applications will be reviewed to
ensure that they contain sufficient
information to allow agency staff to
conduct a NEPA analysis so that
appropriate NEPA documentation can
be submitted to NTIA, along with the
recommendation for funding of the
selected applications.
If additional information is required
after an application is accepted for
funding, funds can be withheld by NTIA
under a special award condition
requiring the awardee to submit
78 Id.
sec. 1604, 123 Stat. at 303.
addition, there are documents relating to
NEPA and NHPA requirements that have been
developed specifically for BTOP that are outlined
more fully in the BTOP Grant Guidance.
additional environmental compliance
information sufficient for the agency to
make an assessment of any impacts that
a project may have on the environment.
award these funds competitively to new
or existing applicants.
G. Davis-Bacon Wage Requirements
Applicants are encouraged to identify
and label any confidential and
proprietary information contained in
their applications. NTIA will protect
confidential and proprietary
information from public disclosure to
the fullest extent authorized by
applicable law, including the Freedom
of Information Act, as amended (5
U.S.C. 552), the Trade Secrets Act, as
amended (18 U.S.C. 1905), and the
Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (18
U.S.C. 1831 et seq.). Applicants should
be aware, however, that the Recovery
Act requires substantial transparency.
For example, NTIA is required to make
publicly available on the Internet a list
of each entity that has applied for a
grant, a description of each application,
the status of each application, the name
of each entity receiving funds, the
purpose for which the entity is receiving
the funds, each quarterly report, and
other information regarding awardees.82
Pursuant to Section 1606 of the
Recovery Act, any project using
Recovery Act funds requires the
payment of not less than the prevailing
wages ‘‘at rates not less than those
prevailing on projects of a character
similar in the locality as determined by
the Secretary of Labor,’’ in accordance
with 40 U.S.C. 3142(b), for ‘‘all laborers
and mechanics employed by contractors
and subcontractors on projects funded
directly by or assisted in whole or in
part by and through the Federal
Government.’’ 80 With respect to the
labor standards specified in this section,
the Secretary of Labor shall have the
authority and functions set forth in
Reorganization Plan Numbered 14 of
1950 (64 Stat. 1267; 5 U.S.C. App.) and
Section 3145 of Title 40, United States
Code.
H. Financial and Audit Requirements
To maximize the transparency and
accountability of funds authorized
under the Recovery Act, all applicants
are required to comply with the
applicable regulations set forth in
OMB’s Interim Final Guidance for
Federal Financial Assistance.81
Recipients that expend $500,000 or
more of Federal funds during their fiscal
year are required to submit an
organization-wide financial and
compliance audit report. The audit must
be performed in accordance with the
U.S. Government Accountability
Office’s Government Auditing
Standards, located at https://
www.gao.gov/govaud/ybk01.htm, and
OMB Circular A–133, Audits of States,
Local Governments, and Nonprofit
Organizations, located at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/
a133/a133.html . For-profit awardees
must comply with the Program specific
audit requirements set forth in OMB
Circular A–133, Subpart B, § __.235.
Awardees are responsible for ensuring
that sub-recipient audit reports are
received and for resolving any audit
findings.
I. Deobligation
NTIA reserves the right to deobligate
awards made under this NOFA to
recipients that demonstrate an
insufficient level of performance, or
wasteful or fraudulent spending, and to
J. Confidentiality of Applicant
Information
K. Policy on Sectarian Activities
NTIA encourages applications from
faith-based organizations. On December
22, 1995, NTIA issued a Notice in the
Federal Register on its policy with
regard to sectarian activities. Under
NTIA’s policy, while religious activities
cannot be the essential thrust of a grant,
an application will be eligible for a grant
under the Program where sectarian
activities are only incidental or
attenuated to the overall project purpose
for which funding is requested.83
L. Disposition of Unsuccessful
Applications
Applications accepted for review for
BTOP will be retained for two years,
after which they will be destroyed.
M. State Certifications
With respect to funds made available
under the Recovery Act to State or local
governments for infrastructure
investments, the governor, mayor, or
other chief executive, as appropriate,
must certify that the infrastructure
investment has received the full review
and vetting required by law and that the
chief executive accepts responsibility
that the infrastructure investment is an
appropriate use of taxpayer dollars. This
certification must include a description
of the investment, the estimated total
cost, and the amount of funds to be
79 In
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
80 Recovery
Act sec. 1606, 123 Stat. at 303.
OMB, Interim Final Guidance for Federal
Financial Assistance, 74 FR 18449.
81 See
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
82 See
Recovery Act sec. 6001(i)(5), 123 Stat. at
515.
83 60
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
FR 66491 (Dec. 22, 1995).
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
used, and must be posted on the
recipient’s Web site and linked to
https://www.recovery.gov. A State or
local agency may not receive
infrastructure investment funding from
funds made available under the
Recovery Act unless this certification is
made and posted.84
N. Waiver Authority
It is the general intent of NTIA not to
waive any of the provisions set forth in
this NOFA. However, under
extraordinary circumstances and when
it is in the best interest of the Federal
government, NTIA, upon its own
initiative or when requested by an
applicant, may waive any of the
provisions in this NOFA. Waivers may
only be granted for requirements that
are discretionary and not mandated by
statute or other applicable law. Any
request for a waiver must set forth the
extraordinary circumstances for the
request and be submitted with the
application.
With respect to requests for waiver of
Section VI.E. (filing instructions),
further information regarding the
procedures for seeking such waivers
will be made available in the Grant
Guidance.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
O. Compliance With Applicable Laws
Any recipient of funds under this
NOFA shall be required to comply with
all applicable Federal and State laws,
including but not limited to: (i) The
nondiscrimination and equal
employment opportunity requirements
of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000e et
seq., 7 CFR pt. 15); (ii) Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794 et
seq.; 7 CFR part 15b); (iii) the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.; 45 CFR part 90);
(iv) the Architectural Barriers Act of
1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151 et
seq.); (v) the Uniform Federal
Accessibility Standards (UFAS)
(Appendix A to 41 CFR subpart 101–
19.6); and (vi) the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions
of NEPA, and certain related Federal
environmental laws, statutes,
regulations, and Executive Orders found
in 7 CFR part 1794.
P. Communications Laws
Awardees, and in particular, CCI
awardees, will be required to comply
with all applicable Federal and State
communications laws and regulations as
applicable, including, for example, the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.); the
Telecommunications Act of 1996, as
amended (Pub. L. 104–104, 110 Stat. 56
(1996)); and the Communications
Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (47
U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) (CALEA). For
further information, see https://
www.fcc.gov.
Q. Buy American Notice
1. General Prohibition and Waiver
None of the funds appropriated or
otherwise made available by the
Recovery Act may be used for the
construction, alteration, maintenance, or
repair of a public building or public
work (as such terms are defined in 2
CFR 176.140) unless all of the iron,
steel, and manufacturing goods used in
the project are produced in the United
States.85 On July 1, 2009, the
Department of Commerce published a
notice in the Federal Register stating
that the Secretary of Commerce had
determined that applying the Buy
American provision for the use of
certain broadband equipment in public
BTOP projects would be inconsistent
with the public interest.86
As explained below, to the extent that
an applicant wishes to use broadband
equipment or goods that are not covered
by the Secretary’s waiver, it may seek an
additional waiver on a case-by-case
basis as part of its application for
Recovery Act funds.
2. OMB Buy American Notice
Requirement
Pursuant to OMB guidance on the
Recovery Act,87 NTIA is required to
provide notice as prescribed in 2 CFR
176.170.
§ 176.170 Notice of Required Use of
American Iron, Steel, and Manufactured
Goods (covered under International
Agreements)—Section 1605 of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009.
When requesting applications or
proposals for Recovery Act programs or
activities that may involve construction,
alteration, maintenance, or repair of a
public building or public work, and
involve iron, steel, and/or manufactured
goods covered under international
agreements, the agency shall use the
notice described in the following
paragraphs in the solicitation:
(a) Definitions. Designated country
iron, steel, and/or manufactured goods,
foreign iron, steel, and/or manufactured
goods, manufactured goods, public
85 Id.
84 See
Recovery Act sections 1511, 1526, 123 Stat.
at 287, 293.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
sec. 1605, 123 Stat. at 303.
74 FR 31402 (July 1, 2009).
87 See 2 CFR part 176.
86 See
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
3813
building and public work, and steel, as
used in this provision, are defined in 2
CFR 176.160(a).
(b) Requests for determinations of
inapplicability. A prospective applicant
requesting a determination regarding the
inapplicability of Section 1605 of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111–5) (Recovery
Act) should submit the request to the
award official in time to allow a
determination before submission of
applications or proposals. The
prospective applicant shall include the
information and applicable supporting
data required by 2 CFR 176.160(c) and
(d) in the request. If an applicant has not
requested a determination regarding the
inapplicability of Section 1605 of the
Recovery Act before submitting its
application or proposal, or has not
received a response to a previous
request, the applicant shall include the
information and supporting data in the
application or proposal.
(c) Evaluation of project proposals. If
the Federal Government determines that
an exception based on unreasonable
cost of domestic iron, steel, and/or
manufactured goods applies, the Federal
Government will evaluate a project
requesting exception to the
requirements of Section 1605 of the
Recovery Act by adding to the estimated
total cost of the project 25 percent of the
project cost if foreign iron, steel, or
manufactured goods are used based on
unreasonable cost of comparable
domestic iron, steel, or manufactured
goods.
(d) Alternate project proposals.
(1) When a project proposal includes
foreign iron, steel, and/or manufactured
goods, other than designated country
iron, steel, and/or manufactured goods,
that are not listed by the Federal
Government in this Buy American
notice in the request for applications or
proposals, the applicant may submit an
alternate proposal based on use of
equivalent domestic or designated
country iron, steel, and/or manufactured
goods.
(2) If an alternate proposal is
submitted, the applicant shall submit a
separate cost comparison table prepared
in accordance with paragraphs 2 CFR
176.160(c) and (d) for the proposal that
is based on the use of any foreign iron,
steel, and/or manufactured goods for
which the Federal Government has not
yet determined an exception applies.
(3) If the Federal Government
determines that a particular exception
requested in accordance with 2 CFR
176.160(b) does not apply, the Federal
Government will evaluate only those
proposals based on use of the equivalent
domestic or designated country iron,
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3814
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
steel, and/or manufactured goods, and
the applicant shall be required to
furnish such domestic or designated
country items.
R. Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be
‘‘economically significant’’ under
Executive Order 12866.88 The Recovery
Act appropriates $4.7 billion to NTIA
for broadband grants and other
purposes. Awards must be made no
later than September 30, 2010. In
accordance with Executive Order 12866,
NTIA updated its economic analysis,
which was completed for the first round
of funding and outlined the costs and
benefits of implementing BTOP, to
reflect the changes made to the Program
for the second round of funding. The
complete analyses are available from
NTIA upon request.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
S. Executive Order 13132
It has been determined that this notice
does not contain policies with
Federalism implications as that term is
defined in Executive Order 13132.89
T. Administrative Procedure Act
Statement
This NOFA is being issued without
advance rulemaking or public comment
under the Administrative Procedure Act
of 1946, as amended (5 U.S.C. 553)
(APA). The APA has several exemptions
to rulemaking requirements. Among
them is an exemption for ‘‘good cause’’
found at 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), which
allows effective government action
without rulemaking procedures where
withholding the action would be
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’
The DOC has determined, consistent
with the APA, that making these funds
available under this NOFA for
broadband development, as mandated
by the Recovery Act, is in the public
interest. Given the emergency nature of
the Recovery Act and the extremely
short time period within which all
funds must be obligated, withholding
this NOFA to provide for public notice
and comment would unduly delay the
provision of benefits associated with
these broadband initiatives and be
contrary to the public interest.
For the same reasons, NTIA finds
good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to
waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness
for this action. Because notice and
opportunity for comment are not
required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)
or any other law, the analytical
88 Exec. Order No. 12,866, 58 FR 51735 (Sept. 30,
1993).
89 Exec. Order No. 13,132, 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 4,
1999).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are inapplicable.
Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required and has not
been prepared.
U. Congressional Review Act
NTIA has submitted this NOFA to the
Congress and the Government
Accountability Office under the
Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking Act (Congressional Review
Act), 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq. It has been
determined that this NOFA is a ‘‘major
action’’ within the meaning of the Act
because it will result in an annual effect
on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more. This NOFA sets out the
administrative procedures for making
grants totaling approximately $2.6
billion to implement a nationwide
broadband initiative to expand the reach
and quality of broadband services in the
United States.
With funds made available through
the Recovery Act, BTOP will provide a
total of $4.7 billion through NTIA to
provide broadband grants throughout
the United States for unserved and
underserved communities, to increase
public computer center capacity, and to
encourage sustainable adoption of
broadband services. The Recovery Act
provides that BTOP awards must be
made no later than September 30, 2010.
Moreover, projects funded under the
Program must be substantially
completed no later than two years
following the date of issuance of the
award. A 60-day delay in implementing
this NOFA pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act would
hamper NTIA’s mission to provide
expeditiously assistance to eligible
entities to begin and complete projects
within the statutory requirements of the
Recovery Act.
Thus, NTIA finds good cause under 5
U.S.C. 808(2) that prior notice and
public procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest. To the extent that NTIA
provided a 60-day delay in effectiveness
pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act, NTIA would not be able to execute
the statutory duties required by the
Recovery Act in a timely manner. This
finding is consistent with the objectives
of the Recovery Act, which specifically
provides clear preferences for rapid
agency action and quick-start activities
designed to spur job creation and
economic benefit. Accordingly, this
NOFA shall take effect upon publication
in the Federal Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
1. Reporting and Registration
Requirement Under Section 1512(c) of
the Recovery Act
The Recovery Act requires the
recipient of an award to complete
projects or activities that are funded
under the Recovery Act and to report on
the use of Recovery Act funds provided
through the award.90 Information from
these reports will be made available to
the public. The recipient shall submit
its first report no later than 10 calendar
days after the end of the initial calendar
quarter in which the recipient receives
the assistance award funded in whole or
in part by the Recovery Act.91
Thereafter, the recipient shall submit
reports no later than the tenth day after
the end of each calendar quarter.92 The
recipient and its sub-recipients must
maintain current registrations in the
CCR (https://www.ccr.gov) at all times
during which they have active Federal
awards funded with Recovery Act
funds. A DUNS number is one of the
requirements for registration in the CCR.
The recipient shall report the
information described in Section
1512(c) of the Recovery Act using the
reporting instructions and data elements
that will be provided online at https://
www.FederalReporting.gov unless the
information is pre-populated.
2. NTIA’s Additional Paperwork
Reduction Act Analysis
Copies of all forms, regulations, and
instructions referenced in this NOFA
may be obtained from NTIA. Data
furnished by the applicants will be used
to determine eligibility for Program
benefits. Furnishing the data is
voluntary; however, the failure to
provide data could result in Program
benefits being withheld or denied.
The collection of information is vital
to NTIA to ensure compliance with the
provisions of this NOFA and to fulfill
the requirements of the Recovery Act. In
summary, the collection of information
is necessary in order to implement the
Program.
90 Recipients who fail to submit reports pursuant
to Section 1512(c) of the Recovery Act are
considered to be non-compliant. Non-compliant
recipients, including those who are persistently late
or negligent in their reporting obligations, are
subject to Federal action, up to and including the
termination of Federal funding or the ability to
receive Federal funds in the future. Memorandum
for the Heads of Executive Departments and
Agencies re: Improving Compliance in Recovery
Act Recipient Reporting (OMB M–10–05 November
30, 2009), available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/
omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-05.pdf.
91 Recovery Act sec. 1512(c), 123 Stat. at 287.
92 Id.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
The following estimates are based on
the average over the first three years the
Program is in place.
Comprehensive Community
Infrastructure
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 225 hours per
response.
Respondents: States, local
governments, and any agency,
subdivision, instrumentality, or political
subdivision thereof; the District of
Columbia; a territory or possession of
the United States; an Indian tribe (as
defined in Section 4 of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b)); a
native Hawaiian organization; a
nonprofit foundation, a non-profit
corporation, a non-profit institution, or
a non-profit association; other nonprofit entities; for-profit corporations;
limited liability companies; and
cooperative or mutual organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,394.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.27.
Estimated Number of Responses:
1,770.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
(hours) on Respondents: 398,250.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Public Computer Center
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 128 hours per
response.
Respondents: States, local
governments, and any agency,
subdivision, instrumentality, or political
subdivision thereof; the District of
Columbia; a territory or possession of
the United States; an Indian tribe (as
defined in Section 4 of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b)); a
native Hawaiian organization; a nonprofit foundation, a non-profit
corporation, a non-profit institution, or
a non-profit association; other nonprofit entities; for-profit corporations;
limited liability companies; and
cooperative or mutual organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
472.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.23.
Estimated Number of Responses: 581.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
(hours) on Respondents: 74,368.
Sustainable Broadband Adoption
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 151 hours per
response.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Respondents: States, local
governments, and any agency,
subdivision, instrumentality, or political
subdivision thereof; the District of
Columbia; a territory or possession of
the United States; an Indian tribe (as
defined in Section 4 of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b)); a
native Hawaiian organization; a nonprofit foundation, a non-profit
corporation, a non-profit institution, or
a non-profit association; other nonprofit entities; for-profit corporations;
limited liability companies; and
cooperative or mutual organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
382.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.4.
Estimated Number of Responses: 535.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
(hours) on Respondents: 80,785.
The grant application forms for BTOP
CCI, PCC, and SBA projects and the
subsequent data collection will be
submitted to OMB for review under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. OMB
control numbers will be assigned and
published in separate Federal Register
notices. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with a collection of information subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
W. Recovery Act
Additional information about the
Recovery Act is available at https://
www.Recovery.gov.
X. Authorized Signatories
Only authorized grant officers can
bind the Government to the expenditure
of funds.
Appendix to Notice of Funds
Availability—Broadband Technology
Opportunities Program Policy
Justification
Streamlining the Application
During the initial round of funding,
applicants had a choice to complete a
Broadband Infrastructure application, a
Public Computer Center (PCC) application, or
a Sustainable Broadband Adoption (SBA)
application, depending on the type of project
being proposed. Those applicants considered
highly qualified after completing Step One of
the review process were required to submit
additional information during the Step Two
‘‘due diligence’’ review to substantiate the
representations provided in the
application.93 During the initial round of
funding, some stakeholders, especially those
93 See
PO 00000
74 FR at 33107.
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
3815
applicants completing the Broadband
Infrastructure application, stated that
completing the initial application was overly
burdensome due to the type and amount of
questions asked and the number of
attachments required. RUS and NTIA
tentatively concluded that the application
process should be streamlined and invited
public comment in the RFI.94
Commenters generally support the current
two-step review process and the level of
information and supporting documentation
that NTIA requires.95 Only a small minority
of commenters suggest doing away with the
two-step review process in favor of a
simplified one-step process modeled after
NTIA’s Technologies Opportunities
Program.96 Additionally, while a minority of
commenters advocate increasing the
information requirements of Step One in
order to validate the legitimacy of
applications,97 most commenters urge that
NTIA require less information initially and
defer the collection of supplementary budget
and financial information until the Step Two
due diligence review.98 Commenters also
argue that applicants should not be required
to obtain engineering certifications,99
environmental reviews,100 or antenna sites
and backhaul facilities 101 until Step Two. To
minimize the burden of the application and
review process, commenters recommend that
NTIA increase the amount of time available
to applicants to submit due diligence
materials.102
NTIA concludes that it will modify aspects
of the two-step review process to collect the
most essential information upfront in the
application, with the option to collect
additional data during the due diligence
review, as needed.
Commenters also offer numerous technical
changes that would help streamline the
application submission process during this
round of funding. Commenters recommend
that the Easygrants® System be tested for
94 See
74 FR 58940, 58941 (Nov. 16, 2009).
e.g., RVW, Inc. at 1 (Nov. 30, 2009); Merit
Network at 1 (Nov. 30, 2009); City of Grover Beach
at 1 (Nov. 30, 2009); Nemont Tel. Coop. at 1 (Nov.
30, 2009).
96 See, e.g., Hous. Opportunities & Concepts at 1
(Nov. 25, 2009); Wireless Internet Serv. Providers
Ass’n (WISPA) at 3–6 (Nov. 30, 2009).
97 See, e.g., Nemont Tel. Coop. at 1; Mont. Indep.
Telecomms. Sys. at 3 (Nov. 30, 2009); Nat’l Rural
Telecomms. Coop. & DigitalBridge Commc’ns at 2
(Nov. 30, 2009).
98 See, e.g., Fla.’s Heartland REDI at 1–2 (Nov. 30,
2009); Am. Library Ass’n at 5–6 (Nov. 30, 2009);
Wis. Dep’t of Pub. Instruction at 2 (Nov. 30, 2009);
Sch., Health, & Libraries Broadband Coal. at 8 (Nov.
30, 2009).
99 See, e.g., Commonwealth of Pa. at 1–3 (Nov. 25,
2009); WISPA at 3–6; E. Or. Telecom at 1 (Nov. 19,
2009).
100 See, e.g., Ctr. for Soc. Inclusion at 2 (Nov. 30,
2009); Rural Broadband Corp. at 11–13 (Nov. 30,
2009); Commonwealth of Pa. at 1–3.
101 See, e.g., Penasco Valley Tel. Coop. at 2 (Nov.
30, 2009).
102 See, e.g., Vantage Point Solutions at 10–11
(Nov. 30, 2009); Nat’l Educ. Broadband Serv. Ass’n
at 3 (Nov. 30, 2009); Internet2 at 26–27 (Nov. 30,
2009); Rural Broadband Corp. at 6.
95 See,
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3816
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
stability and usability 103 and modified to
accept alternative documents, such as
graphical project timelines.104 Multiple
respondents advocate improving the
mapping tool by creating separate versions
for Last Mile and Middle Mile applications
or by allowing applicants to submit mapping
data in a number of different forms,
including computer-aided design (CAD) or
geographic information system (GIS)
format.105
Commenters suggest achieving consistency
between the application forms and guidance
materials 106 and eliminating redundant
questions, particularly those duplicating the
Executive Summary requirements.107
Commenters also suggest that eliminating or
altering a number of attachments, including
the engineering certification 108 and financial
documentation,109 would significantly
improve the applicant experience.
NTIA agrees with commenters that the
application process can be more userfriendly. Accordingly, it makes numerous
adjustments to the online application system
to streamline the intake of information and
reduce applicant burden. These steps include
separating the BTOP infrastructure
application from the BIP infrastructure
application, consistent with the independent
administration of the BIP and BTOP
programs, separating the PCC application
from the SBA application, as well as
eliminating the requirement to use the
mapping tool to create proposed funded
service areas. NTIA also makes it easier for
applicants filing applications in multiple
project categories to link these applications
in furtherance of NTIA’s focus on
comprehensive communities. NTIA further
simplifies the application requirements,
including eliminating the submission of an
engineering certification form with the initial
application.
A majority of the commenters advocate
abandoning Census blocks in favor of other
means of specifying proposed funded service
areas.110 Commenting municipalities and
cities unanimously express their
dissatisfaction with the use of Census block
data, citing it as a cumbersome method of
reporting proposed funded service area
103 See, e.g., Tex. A&M at 1 (Nov. 29, 2009); City
of Grover Beach at 1.
104 See, e.g., City of Seattle at 3 (Nov. 30, 2009);
Penasco Valley Tel. Coop. at iv, 3; City of N.Y. at
3 (Nov. 30, 2009).
105 See, e.g., Rural Broadband Now! at 5 (Nov. 30,
2009); Nat’l Educ. Broadband Serv. Ass’n at 4 (Nov.
30, 2009); Mid-Rivers Commc’ns at 3–4 (Dec. 1,
2009).
106 See, e.g., Mass. Executive Office of Hous. and
Econ. Dev. at 5 (Nov. 30, 2009); NATOA at 20 (Nov.
30, 2009).
107 See, e.g., FiberTower Corp. at 3–4 (Nov. 30,
2009); Cal. Broadband Coop. at 3 (Nov. 30, 2009).
108 See, e.g., Ass’n of Commc’ns Engineers at 1–
2 (Nov. 30, 2009); WHRO–TV at 1 (Nov. 30, 2009).
109 See, e.g., Hostos Cmty. Coll. at 1 (Nov. 30,
2009); City of Philadelphia at 4 (Nov. 30, 2009);
Broadband Satellite Commenters at 10 (Nov. 30,
2009).
110 See, e.g., NCTH-Cleartalk at 1 (Nov. 21, 2009);
Commonwealth of Pa. at 4; Satellite Indus. Ass’n at
4 (Nov. 30, 2009); New Am. Found. at 21 (Nov. 30,
2009).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
designations.111 Multiple commenters offer
zip codes, city boundaries, or even latitude
and longitude coordinates as less
burdensome alternatives for applicants.112
Several commenters propose using Census
tract data as a less burdensome alternative to
Census block data, in part because broadband
service providers are already required to
report their subscriber and demographic
information according to Census tracts in
order to file FCC Form 477.113
NTIA agrees with commenters that
requiring applicants to provide proposed
funded service areas by Census block data is
overly burdensome, especially when
applicants could use other methods to
indicate these areas. In this funding round,
NTIA will instead require applicants to
indicate their proposed funded service area
using Census block groups or Census tracts.
Relationship Between BIP and BTOP
Because the Recovery Act prohibits a
project from receiving funding from NTIA in
areas where RUS has funded a project, the
First NOFA required applicants whose
proposed funded service areas were at least
75 percent rural to submit infrastructure
applications to RUS for consideration under
BIP, with the option of additional
consideration under BTOP. The First NOFA
provided that NTIA would not fund such an
application unless RUS had declined to fund
it. In response to informal comments from
stakeholders during the initial round of
funding, the agencies’ RFI invited public
comment on whether the agencies should
continue to require that these kinds of rural
infrastructure applications be submitted to
RUS first or whether the agencies should
permit applicants to file largely rural
applications directly to NTIA without also
having to submit them to RUS.114
The majority of commenters agree that
rural applicants should be permitted to apply
directly to NTIA for BTOP grants without
being required first to apply to RUS for BIP
loans or grants.115 The most widely cited
rationale was the needless burden imposed
on applicants to provide the additional
financial analysis required by the RUS loan
application for rural projects that do not
qualify as remote and unserved or are not
viable with only 50 percent grant funding.116
Commenters also cite the inefficiency of
requiring RUS to review proposals that are
not even viable for BIP.117
A majority of commenters favor the
continued use of a common BIP–BTOP
application to avoid the duplicative effort of
111 See, e.g., Montgomery County at 2 (Nov. 30,
2009); Oakland County at 1 (Nov. 30, 2009); City
of N.Y. at 2; City of San Francisco at 3 (Nov. 30,
2009).
112 See, e.g., Open Range Commc’ns at 4 (Nov. 30,
2009); Ctr. of Soc. Inclusion at 2; Harris Corp at iii
(Nov. 30, 2009).
113 See, e.g., John Staurulakis, Inc. at 14 (Nov. 30,
2009); Rural Broadband Corp. at 7.
114 See 74 FR at 58941.
115 See, e.g., Mass. Executive Office of Hous. and
Econ. Dev. at 3–4; Am. Library Ass’n at 7.
116 See, e.g., TCA at 1–2 (Nov. 30, 2009).
117 See, e.g., XO Commc’ns at 2 (Nov. 30, 2009);
TCA at 1–2.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
completing multiple applications.118 A few
of these commenters favor maintaining the
approach taken in the initial round of
funding that required concurrent joint
applications and reserving to RUS the first
option to fund eligible proposals.119 The
chief benefit adduced in support of this
position is RUS’s expertise in evaluating
rural applications so as to avoid redundant
awards to ‘‘active’’ RUS borrowers.120
Commenters further recommend that the
agencies implement a ‘‘check box’’ by which
an applicant may request immediate
consideration by NTIA because its rural
project requires more than a 50 percent grant
to be viable or seeks to address one of NTIA’s
broadband objectives 121 and allow
applicants to produce only one financial
analysis to demonstrate an ability to support
either a 50 percent contribution (as required
for BIP) or a 20 percent contribution (as
required for BTOP) to a project.122
In this funding round, RUS and NTIA
conclude that applicants that are eligible for
both BIP and BTOP have the option to apply
to either agency for funding for the same
project, but applicants should apply to only
one agency for a given project. Applicants
who are current RUS borrowers or grantees,
applicants who are proposing a Last Mile
service area that is 75 percent or more rural,
or applicants whose Last Mile component (to
residential consumers and non-community
anchor institutions) exceeds 20 percent of
total eligible project costs are strongly
encouraged to apply to RUS for funding
under BIP.
Mindful of the statutory prohibition against
duplicative funding, several parties suggest
that RUS and NTIA might coordinate their
funding determinations to leverage Federal
resources most efficiently and effectively by
having NTIA fund only grants and RUS fund
only loans for rural projects; 123 awarding
preference for BIP loans to applicants that
apply to RUS first; 124 considering projects
that are 75 percent rural for BTOP grant-only
financing to leverage existing infrastructure
and cooperative relationships (e.g., wireless
network via rural electric cooperative); 125
and avoiding the appearance of duplicative
funding by not funding in areas where BIP
loans are active or have been recently
approved.126
NTIA is in accord with the views of
commenters who point out that the agencies
are statutorily prohibited from funding
118 See, e.g., Tex. Statewide Tel. Coop. at 5 (Nov.
25, 2009).
119 See, e.g., Vantage Point Solutions at 5–7; Rural
Cmty. Assistance P’ship at 2 (Nov. 19, 2009); RVW
Inc. at 2; Mid-Rivers Commc’ns at 6–7 (Dec. 1,
2009); S.D. Telecomms. Ass’n at 5, 11 (Nov. 30,
2009).
120 See, e.g., Mid-Rivers Commc’ns at 6.
121 See, e.g., Nat’l Rural Telecomms. Coop. &
DigitalBridge Commc’ns Corp. at 6–7 (Nov. 30,
2009).
122 See, e.g., John Staurulakis, Inc. at 18; TCA at
1–2.
123 See, e.g., E. Shore of Va. Broadband Auth. at
2 (Nov. 30, 2009).
124 See, e.g., Penasco Valley Tel. Coop. at 5.
125 See, e.g., TransWorld Network at 3 (Nov. 24,
2009).
126 See, e.g., Mid-Rivers Commc’ns at 6.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
projects in the same area and that such
duplicative funding would be wasteful and
inconsistent with the objectives of the
Recovery Act. Thus, as in the first funding
round, RUS and NTIA will not fund
infrastructure projects in the same service
area. The agencies will coordinate to identify
potential service area overlaps and will
resolve such conflicts in the manner that best
satisfies the statutory objectives of both
programs.
Transparency and Confidentiality
Consistent with the Administration’s
policy and the Recovery Act’s objective to
ensure greater transparency in government
operations, RUS and NTIA invited public
comment on whether the agencies should
permit greater access, consistent with
applicable Federal laws and regulations, to
certain applicant information by other
applicants, policymakers, and the public,
including State and tribal governments.127 In
the RFI, the agencies tentatively concluded
that the application’s Executive Summary
should be made publicly available in this
round of funding.128
The overwhelming majority of commenters
support the RFI’s tentative recommendation
to make the Executive Summary available to
the public, but differ as to how much
applicant information should be made
public.129 The majority of these commenters
recommend that applicants be permitted to
designate trade secrets, financial projections,
and other proprietary information as
confidential.130 The majority of commenters
caution, however, that should confidentiality
protections not be provided, applicants
would hold back critical information needed
for an adequate review of the applications.131
A minority of commenters support making
the entire application public and available
online without confidentiality protections.132
Some States propose a compromise position
whereby NTIA would publish expanded
Executive Summaries disclosing pertinent
facts (targeted area, type of technology used,
project cost and revenue projections) and
withhold only proprietary or patented
technology from public disclosure.133
NTIA agrees with commenters who
advocate more transparency throughout the
application and evaluation processes. During
this funding round, NTIA will post an
announcement identifying each
infrastructure application received, along
with a list of the Census block groups or
tracts that each application proposes to serve
through its project, in addition to the
information it is required to publicly disclose
pursuant to the Recovery Act.
States advocate full access to entire
applications, including mapping data, for
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
127 See
74 FR at 58942.
128 Id.
129 See, e.g., Stratum Broadband at 8 (Nov. 14,
2009).
130 See, e.g., Fairpoint Commc’ns at 5 (Nov. 30,
2009).
131 See, e.g., Nat’l Rural Telecomms. Coop. and
DigitalBridge Commc’ns Corp. at 8.
132 See, e.g., New Am. Found. at 8.
133 See, e.g., Commonwealth of Pa. at 5.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
purposes of State consultation.134 Similarly,
tribal commenters recommend that, due to
historic preservation and tribal sovereignty
concerns, NTIA and RUS timely alert
relevant tribes about applications that
propose to serve their tribal lands.135 In
addition, several commenters contend that
transparency should extend to the public
notice comment and State consultation
processes by making comments from existing
service providers and State and tribal entities
public.136
NTIA is sensitive to the needs of States and
tribes when reviewing applications that
propose to serve areas within their
jurisdictions. NTIA will share with each
relevant State and tribe applicants’ data that
are available on the publicly searchable
database. Additional information may be
requested directly from applicants by each
State or tribe. In addition, NTIA will make
the comments of the States and tribes
available on the publicly searchable database,
with the exception of any confidential
information that the comments may contain.
NTIA also will make certain information
submitted by existing broadband service
providers publicly available as part of the
announcement process for applicants’
proposed funded service areas.
Funding Priorities and Comprehensive
Communities
During the initial round of funding, RUS
and NTIA allocated a total of $4 billion in
funding for various project categories,
including Last Mile infrastructure, Middle
Mile infrastructure, Public Computer Center,
and Sustainable Broadband Adoption
projects. In response to numerous
suggestions concerning how the NOFA could
be modified to ensure that Recovery Act
funds make the greatest possible impact, the
agencies’ RFI invited commenters to provide
quantitative estimates of the projected
benefits of adopting a more targeted funding
approach during this round of funding.137
NTIA and RUS also expressly requested
comment on whether the agencies should
focus on or limit funding to projects that will
deliver Middle Mile infrastructure facilities
into a group of communities and connect key
anchor institutions within those
communities.138
Approximately one-third of commenters
who address the funding priorities section of
the RFI recommend targeting community
anchor institutions for special consideration
in this round of funding.139 These
commenters suggest that certain institutions,
134 See, e.g., Nat’l Ass’n of State Chief Info.
Officers at 2 (Nov. 30, 2009).
135 See, e.g., Forest County Potawatomi at 2 (Nov.
30, 2009).
136 See, e.g., Motorola at 6 (Nov. 30, 2009); Rural
Broadband Now! at 8.
137 See 74 FR at 58942.
138 Id.
139 See, e.g., The Bill & Melinda Gates Found. at
1–2 (Nov. 30, 2009); Media Alliance at 2 (Nov. 25,
2009); Pub. Broad. Serv. at 1–5 (Nov. 30, 2009);
Mass. Executive Office of Hous. and Econ. Dev. at
6; Mid Am. Reg’l Council at 2; Corp. for Educ.
Initiatives in Cal. at 1 (Nov. 28, 2009); Am. Library
Ass’n at 3.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
3817
such as public safety agencies,140 educational
institutions,141 and health service
providers,142 should receive greater funding
priority in order to reflect their impact on
economic development and their greater
need for or use of broadband services. Many
commenters advocating more targeted
funding for community anchor institutions
suggest that they should not need to meet the
unserved/underserved criteria in order to
qualify for funding.143 One commenter
suggests an entirely separate application
track for community anchor institutions.144
Supporters of this targeted funding approach
agree that any definition of community
anchor institutions should include K–12
schools,145 libraries,146 higher education
facilities,147 and healthcare facilities.148 In
addition to these entities, which were
explicitly noted as priorities in the NOFA for
the initial round of funding, some
commenters suggest that NTIA use a more
expansive definition of community anchor
institution that encompasses public access
media, performance spaces, and other
community organizations.149 Commenters
also suggest focusing increased funding to
small businesses 150 and public housing.151
A handful of organizations disagree that
any one application type should be explicitly
targeted for funding, even if it proposes to
connect community anchor institutions or
serve a ‘‘vulnerable’’ population.152 In
particular, these dissenting commenters
advance the opinion that while community
anchor institutions should be eligible for
funding, they are not necessarily any more
meritorious than other eligible entities.153
NTIA agrees with commenters that stress
the importance of connecting broadband to
community anchor institutions. Schools,
140 See, e.g., Motorola at 8–9; Mass. Executive
Office of Hous. and Econ. Dev. at 6–7.
141 See, e.g., Nat’l Educ. Broadband Serv. Ass’n at
11; Corp. for Educ. Initiatives in Cal. at 1.
142 See, e.g., Mayo Clinic at 3 (Nov. 24, 2009).
143 See, e.g., City of N.Y. at 2, City of Philadelphia
at 4–6 (Nov. 30, 2009); Sch., Health, & Libraries
Broadband Coal. at 18.
144 See, e.g., The Bill & Melinda Gates Found. at
1.
145 See, e.g., Hot Springs Greater Learning Found.
at 3 (Nov. 30, 2009); The Bill & Melinda Gates
Found. at 1; Corp. for Educ. Initiatives in Cal. at 1.
146 See, e.g., The Bill & Melinda Gates Found. at
1; Corp. for Educ. Initiatives in Cal. at 1; Am.
Library Ass’n at 3; Nat’l Educ. Broadband Serv.
Ass’n at 5–6.
147 See, e.g., Hot Springs Greater Learning Found.
at 2; The Bill & Melinda Gates Found. at 1; Nat’l
Rural Telecomms. Coop. & DigitalBridge Commc’ns
Corp. at 9.
148 See, e.g., Mayo Clinic at 2; Univ. of Cal. Davis
Med. Sys. at 2 (Nov. 30, 2009); Wash. State Law and
Justice Org. at 3.
149 See, e.g., Media Alliance at 2; Pub. Broad.
Serv. at 1–5; Corp. for Educ. Initiatives in Cal. at
1.
150 See, e.g., Towerstream at 3–4 (Nov. 30, 2009);
Asian Am. Justice Ctr., League of United Latin Am.
Citizens, Minority Media & Telecomms. Council,
Nat’l Urban League & One Econ. Corp. at 5 (Nov.
30, 2009).
151 See, e.g., One Econ. Corp. at 4.
152 See, e.g., Towerstream at 2; Open Range
Commc’ns at 6; Utopian Wireless at 7.
153 See, e.g., Towerstream at 2; Telecom Transp.
Mgmt. at 7; Internet2 at 24–25.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3818
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
libraries, colleges and universities, medical
and healthcare providers, public safety
entities, and other community support
organizations increasingly rely on Internet
connectivity to serve their constituencies and
their communities. Expanding broadband
capabilities for community anchor
institutions will result in substantial benefits
for the entire community, delivering
improved education, healthcare, and
economic development. Broadband
connections to these facilities will not only
enhance their services and effectiveness, but
can also provide potential points of
interconnection for Last Mile service directly
to homes and businesses. For these reasons,
NTIA focuses funding in this NOFA towards
projects that connect community anchor
institutions.
To leverage connections to community
anchor institutions, a number of commenters
explicitly support the prioritization of
Comprehensive Communities.154 Many
supporters of a Middle Mile comprehensive
community priority in this round of funding
suggest that Middle Mile funding should be
contingent upon a commitment from a Last
Mile provider.155 A smaller handful of
commenters note that cooperation among
Middle Mile and Last Mile providers should
be encouraged but not required.156 In
opposition, some commenters argue that it
may be too onerous for community anchor
institutions such as schools and hospitals to
obtain a Last Mile commitment.157
The minority of commenters who voice
skepticism towards a Comprehensive
Community approach to funding worry about
the threat a Middle Mile priority would pose
to the funding of Last Mile projects.158 In
addition to the relationship between Middle
Mile and Last Mile projects, many
commenters oppose the creation of set-asides
for one type of application.159
NTIA agrees with commenters that support
targeting the funding available in this round
towards comprehensive communities with an
emphasis on projects that emphasize Middle
Mile broadband capabilities. Preliminary
findings by the FCC’s National Broadband
Plan Task Force indicate that broadband
service in unserved and underserved areas of
the United States is limited due to
insufficient capacity and to significantly
higher costs of deploying Middle Mile
services in some areas.160 NTIA finds that the
cost of Middle Mile service, particularly in
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
154 See,
e.g., Sch., Health, & Libraries Coal. at 15;
Am. Library Ass’n at 8; Corp. for Educ. Initiatives
in Cal. at 1.
155 See, e.g., S. C. Broadband Coal. at 3 (Nov. 30,
2009); Mayo Clinic at 3; Univ. of Cal. Davis Med.
Sys. at 2.
156 See, e.g., The Bill & Melinda Gates Found. at
5; Mass. Executive Office of Hous. and Econ. Dev.
at 7.
157 See, e.g., Sch., Health, & Libraries Broadband
Coal. at 17; Am. Library Ass’n at 8.
158 See, e.g., Nat’l Telecomms. Coop. Ass’n at 4
(Nov. 30, 2009); Mont. Indep. Telecomms. Sys. at
4; Nat’l Pub. Broadband at 1 (Nov. 25, 2009); City
of N.Y. at 4–5.
159 See, e.g., Commonwealth of Pa. at 9; RVW, Inc
at 2.
160 FCC Identifies Critical Gaps in Path to Future
Universal Broadband, News Release (Nov. 18,
2009).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
unserved and underserved areas, stifles
broadband expansion for those that need it
most. Insufficient Middle Mile broadband
service not only limits the availability and
affordability of end-user broadband
connectivity for consumers and businesses,
but it also diminishes the effectiveness of
community anchor institutions in fulfilling
their missions.161
For these reasons, NTIA seeks to focus on
these types of projects by adopting a
‘‘comprehensive communities’’ approach to
awarding BTOP infrastructure grants, which
prioritizes Middle Mile projects integrated
with community anchor institutions,
including community colleges, or Last Mile
service providers as a means of maximizing
the leverage of taxpayer investments.
Commenters put forth a number of key
criteria that NTIA should consider in its
evaluation of Comprehensive Community
projects, including cost effectiveness,162
technology approaches,163 the size of the
matching funds,164 and support from
community anchor institutions.165 Most
commenters suggest evaluating projects
based on the extent to which the applicant
proposes to connect institutions that serve a
vulnerable population group,166 such as a
historically black university or an institution
serving primarily to Hispanic groups.167 A
smaller number of commenters suggest that
NTIA evaluate the number of community
anchor institutions connected by the
project.168 The proposal to use sustainability
and public-private partnerships as potential
criteria for evaluating Comprehensive
Communities did not receive much
support.169
NTIA agrees with many of the criteria
suggested by commenters to evaluate
Comprehensive Community Infrastructure
projects. Evaluation criteria in this funding
round will prioritize applications that
include a Middle Mile component and
demonstrate commitments to serve
community anchor institutions, including
community colleges, and incorporate publicprivate partnerships and public safety
entities, along with the other project
priorities and additional factors that are set
forth in Section II. of this NOFA.
161 See, e.g., The Bill & Melinda Gates Found. at
6–7 (public libraries); May Clinic at 3
(telemedicine); Motorola at 8–9 (public safety).
162 See, e.g., NTCH-Cleartalk at 1; Spacenet, Inc.
at 6 (Nov. 30, 2009); Rural Broadband Now! at 6–
7.
163 See, e.g., NATOA at 12 (Nov. 30, 2009).
164 See, e.g., Inst. for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) at
3 (Nov. 30, 2009).
165 See, e.g., Forest County Potawatomi at 3.
166 See, e.g., CBN Connect at 2; City of San
Francisco at 3; The Bill & Melinda Gates Found. at
2.
167 See, e.g., Asian Am. Justice Ctr., League of
United Latin Am. Citizens, Minority Media and
Telecomms. Council, Nat’l Urban League, and One
Econ. Group at 5–6.
168 See, e.g., City of San Francisco at 3; The Bill
& Melinda Gates Found. at 2; Corp. for Educ.
Initiatives in Cal. at 1.
169 But see, e.g., Stratum Broadband at 12.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Program Definitions—‘‘Unserved’’ and
‘‘Underserved’’
More than seventy commenters offer
suggestions for clarifying the definitions of
‘‘unserved’’ and ‘‘underserved’’ used in the
First NOFA. Many of these commenters
contend that the current definitions are too
restrictive and recommend that NTIA craft a
broader standard.170 A common concern
among these commenters is that the current
broadband penetration thresholds included
in the definitions exclude many worthy
projects located in urban areas.171
A substantial number of commenters
advocate applying the definitions of
‘‘unserved’’ and ‘‘underserved’’ differently to
different types of applicants.172 Several
commenters request that community anchor
institutions 173 and projects that propose to
serve vulnerable communities,174 no matter
where they are located, be exempt from
having to meet the unserved or underserved
definitions. A few commenters suggest that
NTIA use different definitions depending on
whether an applicant applies as an
Infrastructure, PCC, or SBA project.175
Several commenters recommend that the
socioeconomic status of an area be
considered in determining whether that area
is unserved or underserved. Specifically,
several commenters express concern with
using Census blocks to define an unserved or
underserved area in the previous round and
recommend that NTIA require applicants to
use socioeconomic and demographic data
instead to identify unserved and underserved
areas.176 Many commenters also suggest that
the underserved and unserved definitions
consider the effects of poverty on adoption,
especially as it relates to the affordability of
broadband in an area, and evaluate projects
that propose to address these adoption
barriers more positively.177
Finally, several commenters suggest that
NTIA use actual guaranteed speeds as
opposed to advertised speeds to determine
whether an area is considered
underserved.178 Commenters are divided
170 See, e.g., City of N.Y. at 7; New Am. Found.
at 20–21; Telecomms. Indus. Ass’n at 8 (Nov. 30,
2009); San Jose Hispanic Chamber of Commerce at
2 (Nov. 30, 2009); City of Chicago at 7; Broadband
Satellite Commenters at 15 (Nov. 30, 2009); Nat’l
Rural Telecomms. Coop. & DigitalBridge Commc’ns
Corp. at 11.
171 See, generally, E. Or. Telecom at 2; N.Y. State
Ass’n of Counties at 2 (Nov. 30, 2009); City of N.Y.
at 2.
172 See, e.g., Towerstream at 3–4; City of N.Y. at
2; San Jose Hispanic Chamber of Commerce at 2;
FiberTower Corp. at 8–9.
173 See, e.g., New Am. Found. at 10; Telecomms.
Indus. Ass’n at 14; Am. Library Ass’n at 15.
174 See, e.g., San Jose Hispanic Chamber of
Commerce at 3; Digital Impact Group at 2; Trace
Ctr., Univ. of Wis. at 1–3; Broadband for the Deaf
& Hard of Hearing at 4.
175 See, e.g., Digital Impact Group at 2; State of
Mich. at 11; City of Phoenix at 3.
176 See, e.g., Montgomery County, Md. at 2–3;
NATOA at 6–7; Mid Am. Reg’l Council at 1.
177 See, e.g., Cricket Commc’ns at 7–8; Cmtys.
Connect Network at 1–2; City of Philadelphia at
6–7.
178 See, e.g., Flow Mobile at 12; City of Seattle at
9–11; Inst. for Local Self-Reliance at 4; City of
Portland, Or. at 2; City of Houston at 3; Wireless
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
whether NTIA should eliminate the
provision that defined a service area as
underserved or unserved if certain broadband
speeds were unavailable, with some
commenters recommending that speed be
eliminated as a criterion,179 but many more
recommending that available speeds remain
a focus for defining unserved and
underserved areas.180
NTIA disagrees with commenters in a
variety of respects. The First NOFA provided
very specific definitions of what constitutes
an unserved and underserved area for BTOP
purposes. In NTIA’s review of applications
submitted by private companies, community
anchor institutions, and other stakeholders in
the first funding round, NTIA does not
believe that its definitions proved to be
overly restrictive or hindered applicants from
applying. Additionally, NTIA finds that, for
purposes of consistency between the two
rounds of funding as well as between BTOP
and the Broadband Mapping Program, the
definitions of unserved and underserved
should remain largely unchanged. NTIA has,
however, removed the requirement that
infrastructure projects connecting
community anchor institutions, including
community colleges, must be located in
unserved or underserved areas. The
Comprehensive Community Infrastructure
project category will consider whether a
proposed funded service area is unserved or
underserved as an additional factor giving an
application more priority in scoring. For all
of these reasons, NTIA decides against
substantially revising its definitions of
unserved and underserved.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
Announcement of Applicants’ Proposed
Funded Service Areas
The First NOFA allowed existing
broadband service providers an opportunity
to comment on an applicant’s assertions that
its proposed funded service areas are
unserved or underserved.181 During the
initial round of funding, some stakeholders
suggested that this rule may reduce
incentives for applicants to participate in BIP
and BTOP because of the risk that their
applications may be disqualified from
funding on the basis of information
submitted by existing broadband service
providers that they have no means to
substantiate or rebut. The RFI sought
comment on whether alternative verification
methods could be established that would be
fairer to both applicants and challengers,
what type of information should be collected
from the entity questioning the service area,
and what information should be subject to
public disclosure.182
Numerous commenters request a more
transparent and defined process in which the
agencies describe the procedures and criteria
used to determine whether an applicant’s
Commc’ns Ass’n Int’l at 5–8; NATOA at 10–11; City
of Tacoma at 3; E. Shore of Va. Broadband Auth.
at 3.
179 See, e.g., Commonwealth of Pa. at 13; Wireless
Internet Serv. Providers at 13.
180 See, e.g., Flow Mobile at 12; City of Seattle at
6–7; Am. Cable Ass’n at 13–14; E. Shore of Va.
Broadband Auth. at 3; Alcatel Lucent at 2–3.
181 74 FR at 33122.
182 See 74 FR at 58943–44.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
proposed funded service area is unserved or
underserved and make data submitted during
the announcement process available to the
public.183 Further, to assuage concern that an
application may be disqualified from funding
based on information submitted during the
announcement process, many respondents
suggest that applicants be provided an
opportunity to review and rebut the
comments that existing broadband service
providers submit.184 In addition, many
commenters suggest that data should be
collected from a number of sources before
NTIA renders a final determination as to
whether broadband is already available, such
as FCC Form 477 data.185
Commenters also provide suggestions as to
what type of information should be gathered
from existing broadband service providers
seeking to submit comments. Commenters
overwhelmingly urge NTIA to require that
broadband service providers demonstrate
that available broadband claims are based on
actual speed 186 and coverage,187 which is
independently verifiable and not simply as
advertised.188 Further, a majority of
commenters request that incumbents provide
detail at the Census block level
corresponding with the application.189 Some
respondents propose that NTIA require
existing broadband service providers who
comment on an application’s proposed
funded service area to supply the names and
addresses of current subscribers within the
designated area 190 or prove coverage by
posting coverage availability on their Web
site at all times.191
For this round of funding, NTIA will post
an announcement identifying each CCI
application it has received, along with a list
of the Census block groups or tracts that each
infrastructure application has proposed to
serve through its project at https://
www.broadbandusa.gov for a 15-day period.
The announcement will provide existing
broadband service providers with an
opportunity to voluntarily submit to NTIA
information about the broadband services
that they currently offer in their respective
service territories by Census block group or
tract. If an existing broadband service
provider submits a response outside the 15day period, the information may not be
considered by NTIA in its evaluation of an
183 See, e.g., Flow Mobile at 14; Spacenet at 7;
Mass. Executive Office of Hous. and Econ. Dev. at
8.
184 See, e.g., City of Chicago at 3; CONXX at 15;
Rural Broadband Now! at 8; NATOA at 17.
185 See, e.g., Am. Cable Ass’n at 14–16; CONXX
at 15; U.S. Telecom at 26; Univ. of Ark. Med. Serv.
at 5; Stratum Broadband at 21–22.
186 See, e.g., New Am. Found. at 23; Inst. for Local
Self-Reliance at 5; Merit Network at 8–9; Am. Fiber
Sys. at 3; City of Grover Beach at 12.
187 See, e.g., Stratum Broadband at 22; NTCH–
Cleartalk at 1; Am. Fiber Sys. at 3; City of Grover
Beach at 12; CONXX at 15.
188 See, e.g., New Am. Found. at 23; Flow Mobile
at 14; City of Grover Beach at 12.
189 See, e.g., Merit Network at 8–9; Open Range
Commc’ns at 9; Stratum Broadband at 22;
Commonwealth of Pa. at 13; Fairpoint Commc’ns.
190 See, e.g., Loudoun County, Va., OpenBand
Multimedia, LLC & Roadstar Internet, Inc at 7;
CONXX at 15.
191 See, e.g., Found. Telecomms. at 1.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
3819
applicant’s Last Mile or Middle Mile service
area(s) as unserved or underserved, as
applicable.
NTIA will consider such comments
provided they include the information set
forth in Section V.D.3 of the NOFA, some of
which will be made public.
NTIA adopts this method of evaluating the
unserved or underserved status of applicants’
proposed funded service area as a means to
improve the analysis and minimize the
burden on applicants and commenters. NTIA
also departs from the evaluation process that
RUS will use in that it will no longer use the
RUS mapping tool to have applicants and
commenters draw service area maps or
require existing broadband service providers
to submit comments on each proposed
funded service area specified in an
application. As a result of these process
enhancements, NTIA believes it can expedite
the time period in which existing service
providers have to submit their comments
from 30 days to 15 days. This expedited
schedule will allow NTIA to begin its
evaluation of the unserved or underserved
status of applications that enter due diligence
much more quickly than in the previous
round of funding.
Interconnection and Nondiscrimination
Requirements
In the RFI, NTIA and RUS invited public
comment on whether the interconnection
and nondiscrimination requirements for
infrastructure applicants in the initial round
of funding should be changed.192
Commenters generally suggest that NTIA
maintain the same rules as those of the First
NOFA with no modification to their scope or
application.193
However, several commenters suggest
modifying the scope and application of the
nondiscrimination and interconnection
requirements.194 Commenters suggest minor
adjustments that could be made to these
requirements in order to advance certain
market efficiencies,195 including requiring
grantees to provide fully functional and
comprehensive operations support systems
and associated Application Programming
Interfaces for their wholesale services 196 and
for NTIA to rephrase the network
management and managed service exceptions
in order to encourage companies to provide
shared managed services.197 Some
commenters also request that certain
applicants such as tribes 198 and
municipalities 199 be exempt from the
NOFA’s nondiscrimination and
192 74
FR at 58944.
e.g., Tex. Statewide Tel. Coop. at 12; New
Am. Found. at 23; Vantage Point Solutions at 10;
Eng’g Ass’n at 4; Harris Corp. at iv; CONXX at 16;
City of San Francisco at 1; Am. Fiber Sys. at 4; E.
Shore of Va. Broadband Auth. at 5; Mid-Rivers
Commc’ns at 10; Commonwealth of Pa. at 14.
194 See, e.g., Earthlink and New Edge Network at
2; Stratum Broadband at 23–24.
195 Id.
196 See, e.g., Earthlink and New Edge Network at
2.
197 See, e.g., Stratum Broadband at 23–24.
198 See, e.g., United Tribes Technical Coll. at 1.
199 See, e.g., City of Phoenix at 3.
193 See,
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
3820
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES2
interconnection requirements.200 In
opposition, some commenters request that
the requirements be applied to every
applicant, regardless of the nature of the
entity.201
Commenters express concern that NTIA’s
requirements would not mirror the rules that
are ultimately adopted in the Federal
Communications Commission’s (FCC)
ongoing rulemaking proceeding regarding a
Free and Open Internet.202 These
commenters argue that if the requirements
applicable to BTOP applicants are
inconsistent with those faced by other service
providers, then these additional
nondiscrimination obligations will prove
burdensome or duplicative for broadband
service providers receiving grant funds.203
Commenters suggest that NTIA declare a
sunset date for these requirements either
when the FCC finalizes its network neutrality
rules or at another reasonably foreseeable
date.204 Commenters also recommend that
NTIA declare that compliance with the FCC
rules would be sufficient to meet the
requirements of BTOP.205
A few commenters oppose the First
NOFA’s nondiscrimination and
interconnection requirements altogether.206
These commenters argue that the scope of
these requirements chilled participation in
the Program during the initial round of
funding 207 and that the requirements
conflicted with a private company’s ability to
manage its own network.208 Commenters also
argue that the current approach to the
requirements would pose an oversight
problem for NTIA and RUS and recommend
that compliance be left up to the grant
recipients.209
A few commenters also recommend that
NTIA clarify its interconnection
requirements in order to minimize cost and
controversy.210 These commenters are
especially concerned that the interconnection
and nondiscrimination rules during the
initial round of funding were unclear as
applied to contractors or subcontractors.211
NTIA agrees with commenters that support
maintaining the consistency of the
interconnection and nondiscrimination
200 See, e.g., Merit Networks at 9 (suggesting a
balancing test when applying the
nondiscrimination and interconnection
requirements).
201 See, e.g., Org. for the Promotion &
Advancement of Small Telecomms. Companies at
7–8; Indep. Tel. and Telecomms. Alliance at 10.
202 See, e.g., ADTRAN at 4–5; Telecomms. Indus.
Ass’n at 18; Indep. Tel. and Telecomms. Alliance
at 10; Open Range Commc’ns at 10–11; U.S.
Telecom at 32.
203 See, e.g., ADTRAN at 2; Telecomms. Indus.
Ass’n at 18; U.S. Telecom at 31–33.
204 See, e.g., Indep. Tel. and Telecomms. Alliance
at 10; Open Range Commc’ns at 10–11; ADTRAN
at 4–5.
205 See, e.g., ADTRAN at 4–5.
206 See, e.g., AT&T at 17–18; State of S.D. at 1;
AzulStar at 4.
207 See, e.g., AT&T at 17–18.
208 See, e.g., State of S.D. at 1; AzulStar at 4.
209 See, e.g., AT&T at 18.
210 See, e.g., Stratum Broadband at 24; Alaska
Commc’ns Sys. at 7–8; AT&T at 18–19; U.S.
Telecom at 33–34; CONXX at 16.
211 Id.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:44 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
requirements across the two rounds of
funding. Leaving the requirements
unchanged from the initial round of funding
will help to facilitate the administration of
the grants awarded during the first and
second rounds and avoid imposing differing
nondiscrimination and interconnection
standards on recipients. Accordingly, NTIA
has decided against making any significant
revisions to this section. Any changes made
to this section from the First NOFA are
intended only to clarify and not change the
applicants’ obligations.
Sale of Project Assets
Section IX.C.2 of the NOFA generally
prohibits the sale or lease of award-funded
broadband facilities, unless the sale or lease
meets certain conditions. Specifically, the
agencies may approve a sale or lease if it is
for adequate consideration, the purchaser
agrees to fulfill the terms and conditions
relating to the project, and either the
applicant includes the proposed sale or lease
in its application as part of its original
request for grant funds or the agencies waive
this provision for any sale or lease occurring
after the tenth year from the date the grant,
loan, or loan/grant award is issued.212 Some
stakeholders have suggested that this ‘‘tenyear holding rule’’ is overly restrictive and is
a barrier to participation in BIP and BTOP.213
The agencies invited public comment on
whether and how this section should be
revised to adopt a more flexible approach
toward awardee mergers, consistent with
USDA and DOC regulations, while still
ensuring that awardees are not receiving
excessive profit from the sale of awardfunded assets.214
The clear majority of forty-seven parties
who filed comments on the NOFA’s
conditions on the post-award sale or lease of
project assets support a relaxation of these
conditions.215 Only a few commenters
support retention of the rules.216 Most
commenters agree that the prohibitions on
the sale or lease of project facilities are
unreasonably broad because they fail to
provide flexibility for the government to
consent to a reasonable lease or sale during
the first ten years. One commenter voices a
concern shared by many that the conditions
restricting post-award sales or leases may
inhibit obtaining funding for the project,
explaining that ‘‘the 10-year prohibition on
the sale of the funded assets also seems to
cause a ‘chilling effect’ in terms of capital
raising by applicants and may have caused
many potential broadband providers to avoid
BIP/BTOP entirely.’’ 217
Commenters supporting greater flexibility
regarding the sale of assets recommend the
212 See
74 FR at 58944.
e.g., KeyOn Commc’ns at 3; Commc’ns
Finance Ass’n at 1.
214 See 74 FR at 58944.
215 See, e.g., Cricket Commc’ns at 12; Stratum
Broadband at 12; Flow Mobile at 15.
216 Eng’g Ass’n, Inc. at 4; E. Shore of Va.
Broadband Auth. at 5; Canby Telecom at 1; MidRivers Commc’ns at 10.
217 See, e.g., KeyOn Commc’ns at 3; E. Shore of
Va. Broadband Auth. at 5; Native Broadband
Satellite at 8; Alaska Commc’ns Sys. at 8; Cricket
Commc’ns at 12; Cal. Broadband Coop. at 5.
213 See,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
following revisions: The second NOFA
should allow the government to approve the
sale or lease of project assets on a case-bycase basis; 218 the agencies should remove the
10-year limit and focus on unjust
enrichment; 219 clarify that the project assets
mean only those assets which are purchased
directly from grant funds awarded and not
* * * equipment or services purchased
* * * with ‘‘matching funds;’’ 220 relax rules
so that the agencies may approve sales, ‘‘as
long as the successor agrees to the obligations
of the program;’’ 221 allow for accelerated
depreciation of assets; 222 restrictions should
not apply to IRUs or leases to research and
education networks; 223 and modify the
policy to accommodate the sale or lease to
accommodate the normal five-year
replacement cycle of broadband
equipment.224
NTIA agrees with the majority of
commenters proposing to relax restrictions
on the post-award sale or lease of project
assets and revises this section accordingly.
As a result, awardees may petition for a
waiver authorizing the sale or lease of assets
at any time during the life of the awardfunded facilities and shall include
supporting documentation and justification
regarding why the petition should be granted.
Dated: January 15, 2010.
Lawrence E. Strickling,
Assistant Secretary for Communications and
Information.
[FR Doc. 2010–1097 Filed 1–19–10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
RIN 0572–ZA01
Broadband Initiatives Program
AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service,
Department of Agriculture.
ACTION: Notice of Funds Availability
(NOFA) and solicitation of applications.
SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service
(RUS) announces its general policy and
application procedures for the second
round of funding under the broadband
initiatives (the Second Round NOFA)
established pursuant to the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(Recovery Act) for the Broadband
Initiatives Program (BIP) which
provides loans, grants, and loan/grant
combinations to facilitate broadband
deployment in rural areas. In facilitating
the expansion of broadband
218 See,
e.g., Rural Broadband Now at 9.
e.g., U.S. Telecom at 37–38.
220 See, e.g., Dixie Tech. Funding Agency at 15.
221 See, e.g., Monte R Lee & Co. at 8.
222 See, e.g., Senior Broadband/Internet Adoption
Collaborative at 10.
223 See, e.g., Internet2 at 26–27.
224 See, e.g., TransWorld Network at 5.
219 See,
E:\FR\FM\22JAN2.SGM
22JAN2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3792-3820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1097]
[[Page 3791]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Commerce
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Department of Agriculture
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rural Utilities Service
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Broadband Technology Opportunities Program; Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 75 , No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 /
Notices
[[Page 3792]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
[Docket No. 0907141137-0024-06]
RIN 0660-ZA28
Broadband Technology Opportunities Program
AGENCY: National Telecommunications and Information Administration
(NTIA), U.S. Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) and solicitation of
applications.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NTIA announces general policy and application procedures for
the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP or Program) that
the agency established pursuant to the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act). BTOP provides grants for
deploying broadband infrastructure in unserved and underserved areas of
the United States, enhancing broadband capacity at public computer
centers, and promoting sustainable broadband adoption projects. In
facilitating the expansion of broadband communications services and
infrastructure, BTOP advances the objectives of the Recovery Act to
spur job creation and stimulate long-term economic growth and
opportunity.
DATES: All applications for funding BTOP projects must be submitted
between February 16, 2010, at 8 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) and
March 15, 2010, at 5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).
ADDRESSES: The application packages for electronic submissions will be
available at https://www.broadbandusa.gov. See Supplementary Information
for more details.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general inquiries regarding BTOP
or questions regarding this NOFA, contact Anthony Wilhelm, Director,
BTOP, Office of Telecommunications and Information Applications,
National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce (DOC), 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., HCHB, Room
4887, Washington, DC 20230; Help Desk e-mail: BroadbandUSA@usda.gov,
Help Desk telephone: 1-877-508-8364. Additional information regarding
BTOP may be obtained at https://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/. For
inquiries regarding BTOP compliance requirements, including applicable
Federal rules and regulations protecting against fraud, waste, and
abuse, contact btopcompliance@ntia.doc.gov. Additional information
regarding compliance for BTOP may be obtained at https://www.broadbandusa.gov/compliance.htm.
Authority: This notice is issued pursuant to the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115
(2009).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic submissions: Electronic submissions of applications will
allow for the expeditious review of an applicant's proposal consistent
with the goals of the Recovery Act. As a result, all applicants are
required to submit their applications electronically at https://applyonline.broadbandusa.gov. The electronic application system will
provide a date-and-time-stamped confirmation number that will serve as
proof of submission. Please note that applications will not be accepted
via paper, facsimile machine transmission, electronic mail, or other
media format. Applicants, however, may request a waiver of these filing
instructions pursuant to Section X.N. of this NOFA.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: Broadband
Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP)--11.557.
Additional Items in Supplementary Information
I. Overview: Describes the broadband initiatives in the Recovery
Act, the first round of funding, and an overview of the next round
of funding.
II. Funding Opportunity Description: Provides a more thorough
description of BTOP and the funding priorities.
III. Definitions: Sets forth the key statutory terms and other
terms used in BTOP.
IV. Award Information: Describes funding availability, grant
terms, as applicable, and other award information.
V. Eligibility Information and General Program Requirements:
Establishes eligibility criteria, eligible and ineligible costs, and
general program requirements.
VI. Application and Submission Information: Provides information
regarding how to apply, application materials, and the application
process.
VII. Application Review Information: Establishes the evaluation
criteria for application review.
VIII. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates: Identifies the
initial announcement date for certain awards and provides other
information regarding BTOP.
IX. Award Administration Information: Provides award notice
information, administrative and national policy requirements, terms
and conditions, and other reporting requirements for award
recipients.
X. Other Information: Sets forth guidance on funding, compliance
with various laws, confidentiality, discretionary awards, and
authorized signatures.
I. Overview
A. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act)
On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the Recovery Act into
law.\1\ The essential goal of the Recovery Act is to provide a ``direct
fiscal boost to help lift our Nation from the greatest economic crisis
in our lifetimes and lay the foundation for future growth.'' \2\
Accordingly, the Recovery Act identifies five overall purposes: To
preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery; to assist those
most impacted by the current economic recession; to provide investments
needed to increase economic efficiency by spurring technological
advances in science and health; to invest in transportation,
environmental protection, and other infrastructure that will provide
long-term economic benefits; and to stabilize State and local
government budgets.\3\ The Recovery Act further instructs the President
and the heads of Federal departments and agencies to manage and expend
Recovery Act funds to achieve these five purposes, ``commencing
expenditures and activities as quickly as possible consistent with
prudent management.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No.
111-5, 123 Stat. 115 (2009) (Recovery Act).
\2\ Statement on Signing the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009, Daily Comp. of Pres. Doc., 2009 DCPD No. 00088, at 1
(Feb. 17, 2009), https://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-200900088/pdf/DCPD-200900088.pdf.
\3\ Recovery Act sec. 3(a), 123 Stat. at 115-16.
\4\ See id. Sec. 3(b), 123 Stat. at 116.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with the purposes described above, the Recovery Act
provides the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service
(RUS) and the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) with $7.2 billion to expand access to broadband
services in the United States. In so doing, the Recovery Act recognizes
the growing importance of access to broadband services to economic
development and to the quality of life of all Americans.
The Recovery Act provides $4.7 billion to NTIA to establish the
Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP or Program) and
directs that these funds be awarded by September 30, 2010. This amount
represents a significant investment to advance President Obama's
national broadband strategy. Of these funds, at least $200 million will
be made available for competitive grants for
[[Page 3793]]
expanding public computer center capacity; at least $250 million will
be made available for competitive grants for innovative programs to
encourage sustainable adoption of broadband services; and up to $350
million will be made available to fund the State Broadband Data and
Development Grant Program (Broadband Mapping Program) authorized by the
Broadband Data Improvement Act.\5\ The Broadband Mapping Program is
designed to support the development and maintenance of a nationwide
broadband map for use by policymakers and consumers.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Pub. L. 110-385, 122 Stat. 4096 (to be codified at 47 U.S.C.
1301 et seq.).
\6\ See State Broadband Data and Development Grant Program,
Notice of Funds Availability and Solicitation of Applications, 74 FR
32545 (July 8, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Round One
In response to the first Notice of Funds Availability (First NOFA),
RUS and NTIA received almost 2,200 applications requesting nearly $28
billion in funding for proposed broadband projects reaching all States,
five territories, and the District of Columbia.\7\ When including about
$10.5 billion in matching funds committed by the applicants, these
applications represent more than $38 billion in proposed broadband
projects. RUS and NTIA received applications from a diverse range of
parties, including: State, tribal, and local governments; nonprofits;
industry; small businesses; community anchor institutions such as
libraries, universities, community colleges, and hospitals; public
safety organizations; and other entities in rural, suburban, and urban
areas. Parties submitted more than 830 applications jointly to RUS's
Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP) and NTIA's BTOP, requesting nearly
$12.8 billion in infrastructure funding. NTIA received an additional
260 infrastructure applications that sought only BTOP funding,
requesting more than $5.4 billion in grants for broadband
infrastructure projects in unserved and underserved areas. Parties
submitted more than 360 applications to NTIA requesting more than $1.9
billion in grants from BTOP for public computer center projects. In
addition, parties filed more than 320 applications with NTIA requesting
nearly $2.5 billion in grants from BTOP for projects that promote
sustainable demand for broadband services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Notice of Funds Availability and Solicitation of
Applications, 74 FR 33104 (July 9, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 17, 2009, NTIA announced the first set of awards out of
the $1.6 billion that was allocated for the first round of funding.
These awards, as well as additional awards announced by Secretary Locke
on January 13, 2010, totaled approximately $137 million for investments
in ten broadband projects benefitting ten States.\8\ Of these awards,
$119 million was dedicated for Middle Mile projects; $15.9 million for
Public Computer Center projects; and $2.4 million for Sustainable
Broadband Adoption projects. Additional awards will be announced on a
rolling basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ White House Press Release, Vice President Biden Kicks Off
$7.2 Billion Recovery Act Broadband Program (December 17, 2009),
available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/vice-president-biden-kicks-72-billion-recovery-act-broadband-program.
Department of Commerce Press Release, Commerce Secretary Gary Locke
Announces $7.5 Million Investment to Increase Broadband Access in
Los Angeles (January 13, 2010), available at https://www.commerce.gov/newsroom/pressreleases_factsheets/prod01_008797.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Round Two
1. Funding Process
The purpose of this NOFA is to describe the availability of BTOP
funds for the second round of funding and set forth the application
requirements for those entities wishing to participate in the Program.
Applicants are permitted to apply to one or more of the project
categories. Each application will be screened for initial eligibility.
Those eligible applications that satisfy the statutory purposes and
funding priorities will be prioritized and evaluated against objective
evaluation criteria to determine whether an award may be merited.
Applications that satisfy the BTOP priorities and score highly when
evaluated against the objective evaluation criteria will advance to the
due diligence stage of review, where NTIA may request additional
information and adjustments to the proposal. From this pool of
applications, NTIA will select awardees based on the selection factors.
NTIA anticipates completing this round of funding as quickly as
possible to maximize the stimulative effect of the Recovery Act. NTIA
also is committed to transparency and fairness in the award process and
will require rigorous reporting to ensure prudent stewardship of
taxpayer funds.
2. Request for Information (RFI)
To prepare for this round of funding, on November 10, 2009, RUS and
NTIA released a second joint request for information seeking public
comment on ways to enhance the applicant experience through targeted
revisions to the First NOFA.\9\ RUS and NTIA received approximately 225
comments from institutions and individuals on a wide range of topics,
and these comments have played an important role in developing this
NOFA. For further discussion and explanation of NTIA's reliance on the
public comments in the policy decisions involved in BTOP, see the
attached Policy Justification found in the Appendix at the end of this
NOFA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Joint Request for Information (RFI), 74 FR 58940 (Nov. 16,
2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Project Categories
For this round of funding, NTIA will award grants in three
categories of eligible projects: Comprehensive Community Infrastructure
(CCI), Public Computer Centers (PCC), and Sustainable Broadband
Adoption (SBA).\10\ The CCI category will focus on Middle Mile
broadband infrastructure projects that offer new or substantially
upgraded connections to community anchor institutions, especially
community colleges. The PCC category will help expand public access to
broadband service and enhance broadband capacity at entities that
permit the public to use these computing centers, such as community
colleges and public libraries.\11\ The SBA category will fund
innovative projects that promote broadband demand, including projects
focused on providing broadband education, awareness, training, access,
equipment, or support, particularly among vulnerable population groups
that traditionally have underutilized broadband technology.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Recovery Act Div. A, Tit. II, 123 Stat. at 128.
\11\ Id. Div. A, Tit. II & sec. 6001(b)(3), 123 Stat. at 128,
512-13.
\12\ Id. Div. A, Tit. II & sec. 6001(b)(5), 123 Stat. at 128,
513.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NTIA plans to award all remaining BTOP grants funded by the
Recovery Act in this round of funding. Approximately $2.6 billion of
program-level funding has been allocated to this NOFA by NTIA. NTIA
intends to award approximately $2.35 billion for CCI projects, at least
$150 million for PCC projects, and at least $100 million for SBA
projects.
4. Changes From the First NOFA
Based on the comments received in response to the second RFI and
the experience gained from administering the first round of funding,
NTIA is making a number of changes to the Program. The goals of these
changes are to increase efficiency, sharpen the Program's funding
focus, and improve the applicant experience.
In the first round, RUS and NTIA issued a joint BIP/BTOP NOFA to
[[Page 3794]]
promote coordination between these programs. The agencies gave
applicants the option to file a single application for infrastructure
projects for both programs. For the second round of funding, RUS and
NTIA have decided to issue separate NOFAs for BIP and BTOP to better
promote each agency's distinct objectives. The joint application
process was burdensome for some applicants. Therefore, RUS and NTIA
have eliminated the option of allowing applicants to file a single,
joint BIP/BTOP application in the second funding round in favor of
separate applications.
NTIA has sought to bring further leverage to Federal funds by
giving additional consideration to projects that propose to contribute
a non-Federal cost share/match that equals or exceeds 30 percent of the
total eligible costs of the project.
In addition, NTIA is adopting a ``comprehensive communities''
approach to award BTOP grants for infrastructure projects that
emphasize Middle Mile broadband capabilities and new or substantially
upgraded connections to community anchor institutions to maximize the
benefits of BTOP funds. In adopting this approach, NTIA has
restructured the Broadband Infrastructure category of the First NOFA
into the CCI category for this second round of funding.
Further, NTIA has implemented other targeted changes to several
Program provisions. In particular, NTIA has reduced the number of
BTOP's eligibility factors to just three criteria--eligible entities,
fully completed application, and matching--which will be used to
determine whether an application is eligible for consideration. NTIA
has further streamlined the eligibility review by removing the budget
reasonableness and technical feasibility factors from the eligibility
requirements, because these categories are more effectively evaluated
during the expert review and due diligence phases of application
consideration. NTIA also has changed the number of expert reviewers
from at least three to at least two in order to make the expert review
process as efficient as possible, without impacting the rigor of
review. NTIA will review CCI applications according to the priorities
established in Section II.B. Additionally, NTIA has clarified the
process for requesting waivers from several key statutory and
programmatic obligations, including the matching fund requirement, Last
Mile coverage obligation, and restriction on the sale or lease of
project assets.
With respect to the application, NTIA will now collect the
information most essential to project review in the application itself,
with the option to collect additional data during the due diligence
review, as needed. In addition, NTIA has made numerous adjustments to
the online application system to streamline the intake of information
and reduce applicant burden. In particular, NTIA has reduced the
overall number of attachments to the applications. It also has
separated the BTOP infrastructure application from the BIP
infrastructure application and separated the PCC application from the
SBA application. Moreover, it has eliminated the proposed funded
service area mapping tool and modified the service area delineations
from Census blocks to Census tracts and block groups. NTIA also has
made it easier for applicants filing applications in multiple project
categories to link these applications, in furtherance of NTIA's focus
on comprehensive communities.
II. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Statutory Purposes
Section 6001 of the Recovery Act establishes a national broadband
service development and expansion program to promote five core
purposes:
a. To provide access to broadband service to consumers residing in
unserved areas of the country;
b. To provide improved access to broadband service to consumers
residing in underserved areas of the country;
c. To provide broadband education, awareness, training, access,
equipment, and support to: (i) Schools, libraries, medical and
healthcare providers, community colleges and other institutions of
higher learning, and other community support organizations; (ii)
organizations and agencies that provide outreach, access, equipment,
and support services to facilitate greater use of broadband services by
vulnerable populations (e.g., low-income, unemployed, aged); or (iii)
job-creating strategic facilities located in State- or Federally-
designated economic development zones;
d. To improve access to, and use of, broadband service by public
safety agencies; and
e. To stimulate the demand for broadband, economic growth, and job
creation.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See id. Sec. 6001(b), 123 Stat. at 512-13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. BTOP Priorities
All projects funded under BTOP must advance one or more of the five
statutory purposes outlined above. The Program is designed to extend
broadband access to unserved areas, improve access to underserved
areas, and expand broadband access to a wide range of institutions and
individuals, including vulnerable populations. It will seek to serve
the highest priority needs for Federal investment--particularly
projects that offer the potential for economic growth and job creation.
The Program will support viable, sustainable, and scalable projects.
1. Comprehensive Community Infrastructure Projects
a. Background
In the first funding round, NTIA solicited Broadband Infrastructure
applications in two categories, Last Mile and Middle Mile. Last Mile
projects were defined as any infrastructure project the predominant
purpose of which is to provide broadband service to end users or end-
user devices. Middle Mile projects were defined as any broadband
infrastructure project that does not predominantly provide broadband
service to end users or to end-user devices and that may include
interoffice transport, backhaul, Internet connectivity, or special
access. Middle Mile projects funded to date in Round One also included
expanding and enhancing broadband services for community anchor
institutions such as schools, libraries, colleges and universities,
medical and healthcare providers, public safety entities, and other
community support organizations.
Recognizing the significant importance of Middle Mile
infrastructure to improving broadband capabilities for consumers
residing in unserved and underserved areas of the nation, NTIA has
awarded a significant portion of funds in the first round of funding to
Middle Mile projects, particularly those that connect a significant
number of community anchor institutions. Such projects provide
substantial benefits, including enhancing broadband service for
community anchor institutions, facilitating the development of Last
Mile broadband services in unserved and underserved areas, and
promoting economic growth.
b. CCI Funding Priorities
In this round of funding, NTIA seeks to focus on Middle Mile
projects by adopting a ``comprehensive communities'' approach to
awarding BTOP infrastructure grants. Under this approach, priority will
be given to CCI projects that include a Middle Mile component and
satisfy certain
[[Page 3795]]
additional considerations.\14\ This prioritization will be used for the
sequencing of applications for the objective merit review performed by
expert reviewers.\15\ In particular, the highest priority for merit
review will be given to CCI applications that satisfy all of the
criteria below. Note that the application evaluation process will
continue to consider additional factors, including, for example, the
degree to which the projects will benefit consumers residing in
unserved or underserved areas, the participation of an Indian Tribe or
socially and economically disadvantaged small business concern as
defined under Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (as modified by
NTIA's adoption of an alternative small business concern size standard
for use in BTOP),\16\ and the ability of a project to leverage funding
from another Recovery Act program or other State or Federal development
program.\17\ In order of importance, the CCI priority criteria are set
forth as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Consistent with the terms of the Recovery Act, in this
funding round NTIA will not fund Middle Mile projects in areas that
RUS has already funded with Middle Mile awards made through BIP.
\15\ See Department of Commerce (DOC) Grants and Cooperative
Agreements Interim Manual (Grants Manual), ch. 8, secs. B.1.c. and
B.3 (June 21, 2007) (available at https://oam.ocs.doc.gov/GMD_updated-doc.html).
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 637(a)(4). NTIA sought the Small Business
Administration's approval to adopt a $40 million alternative small
business size standard for BTOP. The Small Business Administration
issued a letter approving the use of this alternative size standard
of $40 million to define a small business concern for purposes of
BTOP.
\17\ See infra Section VII.A.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Projects that will deploy Middle Mile broadband infrastructure
with a commitment to offer new or substantially upgraded service to
community anchor institutions. Those projects proposing to serve a
significant number of community anchor institutions that have expressed
a demand or indicated a need for access or improved access to broadband
service will receive higher priority;
(2) Projects that will deploy Middle Mile broadband infrastructure
and incorporate a public-private partnership among government, non-
profit and for-profit entities, and other key community stakeholders,
particularly those that have expressed a demand or indicated a need for
access or improved access to broadband service;
(3) Projects that will deploy Middle Mile broadband infrastructure
with the intent to bolster growth in economically distressed areas;
(4) Projects that will deploy Middle Mile broadband infrastructure
with a commitment to serve community colleges that have expressed a
demand or indicated a need for access or improved access to broadband
service;
(5) Projects that will deploy Middle Mile broadband infrastructure
with a commitment to serve public safety entities that have expressed a
demand or indicated a need for access or improved access to broadband
service;
(6) Projects that will deploy Middle Mile broadband infrastructure
that includes (i) a Last Mile infrastructure component in unserved or
underserved areas; or (ii) commitments or non-binding letters of intent
from one or more Last Mile broadband service providers.\18\ For Last
Mile infrastructure components in rural areas, however, the additional
costs of the Last Mile component used to offer service to residential
consumers and non-community anchor institutions may not exceed more
than 20 percent of the total eligible costs of the project; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Consistent with the terms of the Recovery Act, in this
funding round NTIA will not fund Last Mile projects in areas that
RUS has already funded with Last Mile awards made through BIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(7) Projects that will deploy Middle Mile broadband infrastructure
and propose to contribute a non-Federal cost match that equals or
exceeds 30 percent of the total eligible costs of the project.
To the extent that a CCI applicant with a Middle Mile component
does not address all of the criteria set forth above (i.e., criteria
(1)-(7)), NTIA will prioritize those applications remaining for merit
review in the order that they satisfy the most highly-ranked criteria
(i.e., applications satisfying criteria (1)-(6) will be sequenced for
merit review, then applications satisfying (1)-(5), then (1)-(4), then
(1)-(3), then (1)-(2) respectively, and, finally, applications that
satisfy only the first criterion). All other CCI applicants with a
Middle Mile component, that is, those that do not satisfy the first
criterion identified above, will be next in priority for merit review.
c. ``Comprehensive Communities'' Policy Rationale
The ``comprehensive communities'' approach, with its focus on the
deployment of Middle Mile broadband facilities and the provision of new
or substantially upgraded connections to community anchor institutions
as its centerpiece, will provide a number of benefits to the public and
taxpayers. ``Comprehensive communities'' projects can leverage
resources and better ensure sustainable community growth and
prosperity. These projects also can create consumer demand and lay the
foundation for the ultimate provision of reasonably priced end-user
broadband services in unserved and underserved communities. Open and
nondiscriminatory CCI projects funded by BTOP will enable other service
providers to serve the community.\19\ Once Middle Mile facilities are
built, the costs of providing services to a broad array of end users
are reduced. Much like the interstate highways that link together the
nation's roads and streets, Middle Mile broadband facilities play a
critical role in the healthy functioning of the nation's broadband
infrastructure and are a necessary foundation for the ultimate
provision of affordable end-user broadband services in unserved and
underserved communities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Recovery Act sec. 6001(j), 123 Stat. at 515.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expanding Middle Mile broadband service not only enhances the
availability and affordability of end-user broadband connectivity for
consumers and businesses, it also increases the effectiveness of
community anchor institutions in fulfilling their missions. Schools,
libraries, colleges and universities, medical and healthcare providers,
public safety entities, and other community support organizations
increasingly rely on high-speed Internet connectivity to serve their
constituencies and their communities. Expanding broadband capabilities
for community anchor institutions will result in substantial benefits
for the entire community, delivering improved education, healthcare,
and economic development.
CCI projects are also job-intensive and pave the way for a ripple
effect of economic development throughout the communities they touch.
Focusing the awards in this funding round on CCI projects that provide
high-speed Middle Mile networks to connect community anchor
institutions, including community colleges, or benefit consumers
residing in unserved or underserved areas will maximize the benefits of
Recovery Act dollars and lay a foundation for economic development for
years to come.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See National Economic Council, Recovery Act Investments in
Broadband: Leveraging Federal Dollars to Create Jobs and Connect
America (Dec. 2009), available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/20091217-recovery-act-investments-broadband.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
d. Relationship to BIP
Although BIP and BTOP no longer will offer a joint application, RUS
and NTIA continue to collaborate to maximize the impact of available
Federal funding, to best leverage the experience and expertise of each
agency, and to avoid geographic overlap
[[Page 3796]]
in projects funded by the two agencies (as required by the Recovery
Act).\21\ To accomplish these objectives, NTIA strongly recommends that
CCI applicants that are currently RUS loan or grant recipients as well
as any CCI applicant whose project will include a Last Mile service
area that is at least 75 percent rural apply to BIP for funding.
Applications from such applicants will not be viewed favorably by NTIA
and will not be a funding priority.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Recovery Act Tit. I, 123 Stat. at 118.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
e. Exclusive Last Mile Projects
As explained above, priority will be given to CCI projects that
include a Middle Mile component. While a CCI project may exclusively
contain a Last Mile component, it will only be considered for merit
review and funding after all projects with a Middle Mile component have
been considered.
2. Public Computer Centers (PCC)
In this funding round, consistent with the Recovery Act, NTIA will
fund PCC projects. These projects provide broadband access to the
general public or a specific vulnerable population and must either
create or expand a public computer center or improve broadband service
or connections at a public computer center, including those at
community colleges, that meets a specific public need for broadband
service. PCC projects are a logical complement to CCI projects, because
they are uniquely positioned to serve many members of a community with
computer equipment, computer training, job training, and access to job
and educational resources that might not otherwise be available.
3. Sustainable Broadband Adoption (SBA)
Consistent with the Recovery Act and the promotion of BTOP's five
core objectives, NTIA also will fund SBA projects. The SBA program is
designed to fund innovative projects that promote broadband demand,
especially among vulnerable population groups where broadband
technology traditionally has been underutilized. Broadband technology
has reshaped the way our nation functions, and NTIA recognizes that
broadband adoption projects strive to ensure that as much of the
population as possible has opportunities, abilities, and resources to
thrive in today's society. With projects focusing on broadband
awareness, access, training, and education, barriers to broadband
adoption can be overcome, fostering educational and business
opportunities and a more competitive country as a whole. NTIA,
therefore, seeks SBA projects that, after establishing a subscribership
baseline in a given community, demonstrate a clear ability to measure
and sustain the expected increase in broadband adoption without ongoing
Federal grant assistance, so that the nation will continue to see the
benefits of these projects well after the period of performance for the
grant award has ended.
C. Application Review and the Selection Process
1. Initial Review
NTIA will conduct an initial review of applications to determine
whether they meet the eligibility requirements set forth in Section
V.A. through V.C. of this NOFA. These requirements are mandatory, and
applicants that fail to meet them will not have their applications
considered further.
2. Scoring Applications
Subsequent to this initial eligibility review, applications will be
separated into the three project categories. For PCC and SBA projects,
applications will receive an Evaluation Criteria Review score by at
least two objective expert reviewers who may be Federal employees or
non-Federal persons. For CCI projects, program staff will prioritize
the applications for the Evaluation Criteria Review based on the BTOP
priorities set forth in Section II.B., and then the applications will
be evaluated in priority order by at least two objective expert
reviewers who may be Federal employees or non-Federal persons. No
consensus advice will be provided by the non-Federal expert reviewers.
Reviewers will be selected based on their expertise in: (i)
Analyzing a business or organizational model pursuant to BTOP purposes;
(ii) designing, funding, constructing, or operating broadband networks
or public computer centers; (iii) broadband-related outreach, training,
or education; (iv) innovative programs to increase the demand for
broadband services; or (v) other broadband-related functions or
activities. Reviewers will evaluate applications against the evaluation
criteria provided in this NOFA and independently score each
application. Reviewer scores will be averaged and NTIA will establish
thresholds that will be used to determine which applications are
considered ``highly qualified.'' Highly qualified applications may be
considered further for an award by NTIA Program staff and given a ``due
diligence'' review. For CCI projects, priority in due diligence
processing will be given to applications that best conform to BTOP
priorities as expressed in Section II.B.1.b of this NOFA.
3. State and Tribal Consultation
The Recovery Act authorizes NTIA to consult with States,
territories, possessions, and the District of Columbia (``States'')
regarding the identification of unserved and underserved areas within
their borders and the allocation of grant funds to projects in or
affecting their State.\22\ After the application deadline, NTIA will
invite each State, via its Governor, to provide input on those
geographic areas within the State for which NTIA should give priority
in selecting projects for funding. States may, if they wish, comment on
specific BTOP applications that propose to serve areas within their
jurisdiction, regardless of the size or geographic scope of the project
and, at their discretion, provide an explanation for why certain
applications meet the greatest needs of the State. NTIA also will
extend the invitation to tribal entities to comment upon applications
that propose to serve tribal communities in an effort to fund projects
that best meet the needs of their tribal lands.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Recovery Act sec. 6001(c), 123 Stat. at 513.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NTIA will share data that are available on the publicly searchable
application database with each relevant State and tribe. States and
tribes that wish to review additional information regarding
applications proposing to serve areas within their jurisdiction may
request such information from applicants directly. States and tribes
will not be required to rank or comment on BTOP applications in order
for applications affecting their areas to receive funding. The input of
States and tribes is consultative in nature and, while extremely
valuable, constitutes only one among several factors the Selecting
Official, the Assistant Secretary, weighs when evaluating applications.
States or tribes will not have the ability to veto any particular
project. States and tribes will have no less than 20 calendar days from
the date of notification to submit their comments to NTIA. NTIA will
make the comments of the States and tribes publicly available at https://www.broadbandusa.gov. Accordingly, States and tribes should not
include in their comments to NTIA any information that is deemed
confidential and proprietary.
4. Due Diligence Review
During due diligence review, applicants may be asked to submit
additional information, as appropriate,
[[Page 3797]]
to clarify or to further substantiate the representations made in their
applications. The supplemental information, along with all information
submitted with the application, will be reviewed and analyzed by NTIA
Program staff to confirm eligibility and evaluate the applications with
respect to general Program requirements, the appropriate Federal share
of the project, evaluation criteria, and selection factors. Applicants
whose supporting documents are not timely filed or who do not
adequately substantiate the representations in their applications may
be rejected. NTIA may, at its discretion, request supplemental
documentation before deciding to reject such applications and re-
evaluate the application package based on all of the information
presented.
At any time during the application review process, NTIA reserves
the right to discuss with the applicant specific modifications to the
application to resolve any differences that may exist between the
applicant's original request and NTIA's determination of eligible costs
and funding priorities, including, for example, the right to adjust the
Federal share of the project. Note that it is NTIA's intent to fund
only the portion of the project that satisfies Program purposes and is
justified based on an analysis of anticipated costs and revenues.
Specifically, pursuant to the Recovery Act requirement that applicants
demonstrate that a project would not have been implemented during the
grant period without Federal assistance, NTIA may seek to adjust the
amount of funds made available for the Federal share of the project to
a level warranted based on this ``but for'' test.\23\ Not all
applicants contacted necessarily will receive a BTOP award. Upon
completion of due diligence, NTIA Program staff will summarize their
analysis for each application reviewed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Recovery Act sec. 6001(e)(3), 123 Stat. at 514.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. The Selection Process
The Director of BTOP (BTOP Director) will prepare and present a
package or packages of recommended grant awards to the Associate
Administrator for the Office of Telecommunications and Information
Applications (OTIA Associate Administrator), or his/her designee, for
review and approval. The BTOP Director's recommendations and the OTIA
Associate Administrator's review and approval will consider the
following selection factors:
a. The Evaluation Criteria Review score of the objective expert
reviewers;
b. The analysis of NTIA Program staff;
c. Satisfaction of the statutory purposes and BTOP priorities set
forth in Section II.;
d. The extent to which the non-Federal cost match equals or exceeds
30 percent of the total eligible costs of the project;
e. The geographic distribution of the proposed grant awards (e.g.,
ensuring that, to the extent practical, NTIA awards not less than one
grant in each State as set forth in the Recovery Act);
f. The range of technologies and uses of the technologies employed
by the proposed grant awards;
g. Avoidance of redundancy, duplication, and conflicts with the
initiatives of other Federal agencies, including Department of
Agriculture loan and grant programs for broadband services, applicable
universal service programs authorized by the Federal Communications
Commission, and, to the extent practical, avoidance of unjust
enrichment; \24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Recovery Act sec. 6001(h)(2)(D), 123 Stat. at 515.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
h. The availability of funds;
i. If applicable, the comments of States, including, but not
limited to, such comments as described in their application for the
Broadband Mapping Program or as subsequently provided to NTIA either on
their own or along with the submission of State-level broadband maps;
\25\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ Consistent with the Recovery Act, the Broadband Mapping
Program provides participating States the opportunity to identify
unserved and underserved areas in their State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
j. If applicable, the comments of tribal entities.
Upon approval of the OTIA Associate Administrator or designee, the
BTOP Director's recommendations then will be presented to the Selecting
Official. The Assistant Secretary selects the applications for grant
awards, taking into consideration the BTOP Director's and the OTIA
Associate Administrator's, or his or her designee's, recommendations
and the degree to which the application package, taken as a whole,
satisfies the selection factors described above and the Program's
statutory purposes and priorities as set forth in Sections II of this
NOFA. Awards will be made on a rolling basis subject to the
availability of funds. Unsuccessful applicants will be notified in
writing.
III. Definitions
The terms and conditions provided in this NOFA are applicable to
and for purposes of this NOFA only.
Applicant means an entity requesting approval of an award under
this NOFA.
Assistant Secretary means the Assistant Secretary for
Communications and Information, National Telecommunications and
Information Administration, Department of Commerce, or the Assistant
Secretary's designee.
Award means a grant made under this NOFA by NTIA.
Awardee means a grantee.
Broadband means providing two-way data transmission with advertised
speeds of at least 768 kilobits per second (kbps) downstream and at
least 200 kbps upstream to end users, or providing sufficient capacity
in a Middle Mile project to support the provision of broadband service
to end users.
BTOP means the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program,
administered by NTIA, under the Recovery Act.
Build-out means the construction or improvement of facilities and
equipment as specified in the application.
Community anchor institutions means schools, libraries, medical and
healthcare providers, public safety entities, community colleges and
other institutions of higher education, and other community support
organizations and agencies that provide outreach, access, equipment,
and support services to facilitate greater use of broadband service by
vulnerable populations, including low-income, the unemployed, and the
aged.
Comprehensive Community Infrastructure (CCI) project means an
infrastructure project that focuses primarily on providing new or
substantially upgraded connections to community anchor institutions.
Economically distressed area means an area that has: (i) A per
capita income of 80 percent or less of the national average; and (ii)
an unemployment rate that is, for the most recent 24-month period for
which data are available, at least one percent greater than the
national average unemployment rate.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ This definition is derived from regulations adopted by the
Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce,
regarding the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as
amended. See 13 CFR 301.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forecast period means the time period used by NTIA to determine if
an application is financially feasible. Financial feasibility of an
application is based on eight-year projections.
GAAP means generally accepted accounting principles.
Grant agreement means the agreement between NTIA and the grantee
for grants awarded under this NOFA, including
[[Page 3798]]
any amendments thereto, setting forth the binding terms and conditions
relating to Federal funding under BTOP. Sample grant agreements are
available for review at https://www.broadbandusa.gov or https://www.ntia.doc.gov.
Grant funds means Federal funds provided pursuant to a grant made
under this NOFA.
Grantee means the prime recipient of a grant under this NOFA.
Last Mile means those components of a CCI project that provide
broadband service to end-user devices through an intermediate point of
aggregation. That is, in most cases, the Last Mile connection goes from
the end-user device through an intermediate point of aggregation (i.e.,
a remote terminal, fiber node, wireless tower, or other equivalent
access point) to a primary IP routing entity in a centralized facility
(i.e., in the central office, the cable headend, the wireless switching
station, or other equivalent centralized facility). The Last Mile also
includes equivalent services that, solely because of close proximity
between the customer and centralized facility, are routed directly to
the centralized facility. The Last Mile will terminate at, and include,
the initial customer-facing router or aggregation switch in the
centralized facility (e.g., a DSLAM, CMTS, RNC, or equivalent) that is
utilized to deliver Last Mile broadband service.
Last Mile service area means the service area of a Last Mile
component of a CCI project, composed of one or more contiguous Census
block groups \27\ or tracts,\28\ where the applicant is requesting BTOP
funds to provide broadband service to end-user devices through an
intermediate point of aggregation and terminating at the initial
customer-facing router or aggregation switch in the centralized
facility used to deliver the Last Mile broadband service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ A Census block group is a cluster of Census blocks having
the same first digit of their four-digit identifying numbers within
a Census tract. A Census block group is the next level above Census
block in the geographic hierarchy.
\28\ Census tracts are small, relatively permanent statistical
subdivisions of a county. Census tracts are delineated for most
metropolitan areas (MAs) and other densely populated counties by
local Census statistical areas committees following Census Bureau
guidelines (more than 3,000 Census tracts have been established in
221 counties outside MAs). Census tracts usually have between 2,500
and 8,000 persons and, when first delineated, are designed to be
homogeneous with respect to population characteristics, economic
status, and living conditions. Census tracts do not cross county
boundaries. The spatial size of Census tracts varies widely
depending on the density of settlement. Census tract boundaries are
delineated with the intention of being maintained over a long time
so that statistical comparisons can be made from Census to Census.
However, physical changes in street patterns caused by highway
construction, new development, or other reasons may require
occasional revisions; Census tracts occasionally are split due to
large population growth, or combined as a result of substantial
population decline. See the Census Bureau's Web site at https://www.census.gov for more detailed information on its data gathering
methodology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Middle Mile means those components of a CCI project that provide
broadband service from one or more centralized facilities, (i.e., the
central office, the cable headend, the wireless switching station, or
other equivalent centralized facility) to an Internet point of
presence. The Middle Mile includes, among other things, the centralized
facilities and all of the equipment in those facilities, except for any
equipment that would qualify as part of a Last Mile component as
defined in this NOFA.
Middle Mile service area means the project service area, composed
of one or more contiguous Census block groups or tracts, where the
applicant is requesting BTOP funds to provide broadband service from
one or more centralized facilities, (i.e., the central office, the
cable headend, the wireless switching station, or other equivalent
centralized facility) to an Internet point of presence.
Pre-application expense means any reasonable expense incurred after
the release of this NOFA up to the issuance of the grant award from
NTIA to prepare an application. These expenses include engineering
costs, accountant or other consultant fees, and costs related to
developing the proposal. Lobbying costs and contingency fees are not
included as pre-application expenses.
Proposed funded service area means the total service area of a CCI
project where broadband service will be provided.
Public computer center means a place, including but not limited to
community colleges, libraries, schools, youth centers, employment
service centers, Native American chapter houses, community centers,
senior centers, assistive technology centers for people with
disabilities, community health centers, and Neighborhood Network
Centers in public housing developments, that provide broadband access
to the general public or a specific vulnerable population, such as low-
income, unemployed, aged, children, minorities, and people with
disabilities.
Recipient means any entity that receives Recovery Act funds
directly from the Federal government (including Recovery Act funds
received through a grant) other than an individual. This includes a
State that receives Recovery Act funds.
Recovery Act means the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009, Pub. L. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115 (2009).
Rural area means any area, as confirmed by the latest decennial
Census of the U.S. Census Bureau, that is not located within: (i) A
city, town, or incorporated area that has a population of greater than
20,000 inhabitants; or (ii) an urbanized area contiguous and adjacent
to a city or town that has a population of greater than 50,000
inhabitants. For purposes of the definition of rural area, an urbanized
area means a densely populated territory as defined in the latest
decennial Census of the U.S. Census Bureau.
Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Small Business Concern
means a firm, together with its controlling interests and affiliates,
with average gross revenue not exceeding $40 million for the preceding
three years, and that meets the definition of a socially and
economically disadvantaged small business concern under the Small
Business Act.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 15 U.S.C. 637(a)(4) (as modified by the Small Business
Administration's approval of NTIA's request to adopt an alternative
small business concern size standard for use in BTOP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
State means, for purposes of BTOP, a State or political subdivision
thereof, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the
United States.
Sub-recipient means an entity that expends Recovery Act funds
received through a subaward from a recipient to carry out a Federal
program but does not include an individual who is a beneficiary of such
a program.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ Implementing Guidance for Reports on Use of Funds Pursuant
to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (OMB M-09-21
June 22, 2009), available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/memoranda_fy2009/m09-21.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tribe means an Indian tribe that has the meaning given that term in
Section 4(e) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance
Act.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 25 U.S.C. 450b(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Underserved area means a Last Mile or Middle Mile service area,
where at least one of the following factors is met: (i) No more than 50
percent of the households in the Last Mile or Middle Mile service area
have access to facilities-based, terrestrial broadband service at
greater than the minimum broadband transmission speed (set forth in the
definition of broadband above); (ii) no fixed or mobile terrestrial
broadband service provider advertises to residential end users
broadband transmission speeds of at least three megabits per second
(``Mbps'') downstream in the Last Mile or Middle Mile service area; or
(iii) the rate of terrestrial broadband subscribership for the Last
Mile or Middle Mile service area is 40 percent of households or less.
[[Page 3799]]
An underserved area may include individual Census block groups or
tracts that on their own would not be considered underserved. The
availability of or subscribership rates for satellite broadband service
is not considered for the purpose of determining whether an area is
underserved.
Unserved area means a Last Mile or Middle Mile service area where
at least 90 percent of the households lack access to facilities-based,
terrestrial broadband service, either fixed or mobile, at the minimum
broadband transmission speed (set forth in the definition of broadband
above). An unserved area may include individual Census block groups or
tracts that on their own would not be considered unserved. A household
has access to broadband service if the household readily can subscribe
to that service upon request. The availability of or subscribership
rates for satellite broadband service is not considered for the purpose
of determining whether an area is unserved.
IV. Award Information
A. General
Approximately $2.6 billion in budget authority has been set aside
for funding opportunities under this NOFA. Publication of this NOFA
does not obligate NTIA to award any specific project or obligate all of
the available funds. Based on Round 1 experience, NTIA expects this
grant round to be very competitive. During Round 1, RUS and NTIA
received approximately 2,200 applications collectively requesting
nearly $28 billion in Federal funds.
B. Funding Limits
Approximately $2.6 billion is available to be awarded under this
NOFA, which NTIA anticipates will be allocated in the following
categories:
a. Approximately $2.35 billion will be made available for CCI
projects;
b. At least $150 million will be made available for PCC projects;
and
c. At least $100 million will be made available for SBA projects.
C. Repooling
Subject to the statutory thresholds set forth in the Recovery Act,
NTIA retains the discretion to divert funds from one category of
projects to another.
D. Unused Funds
Funds remaining from the initial round of funding due to BTOP
funding priorities or any other reason, and unused funds not awarded
under the Broadband Mapping Program, may be used to augment the BTOP
funding categories established above.\32\ NTIA reserves the right to
reopen the application window or release subsequent NOFAs to ensure
that all funds are awarded by September 30, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Award Amount
Given NTIA's Round 1 experience, NTIA expects to make awards within
the following funding ranges. These ranges are not required minimums
and maximums, but applicants requesting amounts for projects outside of
these ranges must provide a reasoned explanation for the variance in
their project size.
CCI: $5 million-$150 million
PCC: $500,000-$15 million
SBA: $500,000-$15 million
F. Award Period
All awards under BTOP must be made no later than September 30,
2010.\33\ While the completion time will vary depending on the
complexity of the project, grant recipients must substantially complete
projects supported by this Program no later than two years, and
projects must be fully completed no later than three years, following
the date of issuance of the grant award.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ Recovery Act sec. 6001(d)(2), 123 Stat. at 513.
\34\ Id. Sec. 6001(d)(3), 123 Stat. at 513.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
G. Type of Funding Instrument
The funding instrument will be a grant.
V. Eligibility Information for BTOP
Applicants must satisfy the eligibility requirements set forth
below in Sections V.A. through V.C. to qualify for funding. Applicants
failing to comply with these requirements will not be considered for an
award.
A. Eligible Entities
1. Applicant Organization
The following entities are eligible to apply for funding:
a. States, local governments, or any agency, subdivision,
instrumentality, or political subdivision thereof;
b. The District of Columbia;
c. A territory or possession of the United States;
d. An Indian tribe (as defined in Section 4 of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b));
e. A native Hawaiian organization;
f. A non-profit foundation, a non-profit corporation, a non-profit
institution, or a non-profit association;
g. Other non-profit entities;
h. For-profit corporations;
i. Limited liability companies; and
j. Cooperative or mutual organizations.
2. BTOP Public Interest Finding
Section 6001(e)(1)(C) of the Recovery Act authorizes the Assistant
Secretary to find by rule that it is in the public interest for any
entity not otherwise encompassed by Section 6001(e)(1) to be eligible
for a BTOP grant to the extent that such finding will promote the
purposes of BTOP in a technology neutral manner. Consistent with the
rationale set forth in the First NOFA,\35\ the Assistant Secretary
found it to be in the public interest to permit for-profit corporations
and non-profit entities (not otherwise encompassed by Section
6001(e)(1)(B)) that are willing to promote the goals of the Recovery
Act and comply with the statutory requirements of BTOP to be eligible
for a grant. By adopting this broad approach, the Assistant Secretary
intended to invite a diverse group of applicants to participate in BTOP
and to expand broadband capabilities in a technology neutral
manner.\36\ NTIA will continue to permit these same entities to apply
for funding in this next round of awards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ See 74 FR at 33134 (July 9, 2009).
\36\ Recovery Act sec. 6001(e)(1)(C), 123 Stat. at 513; 74 FR at
33110.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Fully Completed Application
All applications will be evaluated initially to ensure that they
are fully complete, certified, and contain all supporting
documentation.
C. Cost Share/Matching
1. Matching Requirement
In general, awardees under BTOP are required by statute to provide
matching funds of at least 20 percent toward the total eligible costs
of the project unless the Assistant Secretary grants a waiver. For
costs to be eligible to meet matching requirements, they first must be
allowable under the grant program. Eligible cost concepts are discussed
in more detail in Section V.E. of this NOFA. Applicants must document
in their application their capacity to provide matching funds. NTIA
will provide up to 80 percent of the total eligible costs of the
project, unless the applicant petitions the Assistant Secretary for a
waiver of the matching requirement and that waiver is granted based on
the applicant's demonstration of financial need, as discussed
below.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ See id. sec. 6001(f), 123 Stat. at 514.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generally, Federal funds may not be used as a cost match except as
provided
[[Page 3800]]
by Federal statute.\38\ In-kind contributions, including third party
in-kind contributions, are non-cash donations to a project that may
count toward satisfying the non-Federal matching requirement of a
project's total budget