Draft Program Comment for the Department of the Navy for the Disposition of Historic Vessels, 3746-3750 [2010-1023]
Download as PDF
3746
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
conference, including a systematic
literature review commissioned through
the Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality. The first day and a half of the
conference will consist of presentations
by expert researchers and practitioners
and open public discussions. On
Wednesday, March 10, the panel will
present a statement of its collective
assessment of the evidence to answer
each of the questions above. The panel
will also hold a press telebriefing to
address questions from the media. The
draft statement will be published online
later that day, and the final version will
be released approximately six weeks
later. The primary sponsors of this
meeting are the NIH Eunice Kennedy
Shriver National Institute of Child
Health and Human Development and
the NIH Office of Medical Applications
of Research.
Advance information about the
conference and conference registration
materials may be obtained from the NIH
Consensus Development Program
Information Center by calling 888–644–
2667 or by sending e-mail to
consensus@mail.nih.gov. The
Information Center’s mailing address is
P.O. Box 2577, Kensington, Maryland
20891. Registration information is also
available on the NIH Consensus
Development Program Web site at
https://consensus.nih.gov.
Please Note: The NIH has instituted
security measures to ensure the safety of NIH
employees, guests, and property. All visitors
must be prepared to show a photo ID upon
request. Visitors may be required to pass
through a metal detector and have bags,
backpacks, or purses inspected or x-rayed as
they enter NIH buildings. For more
information about the security measures at
NIH, please visit the Web site at https://
www.nih.gov/about/visitorsecurity.htm.
Dated: January 11, 2010.
Raynard S. Kington,
Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–859 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Part C Early
Intervention Services (EIS) Program
AGENCY: Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of Non-competitive
Replacement Award.
SUMMARY: The Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA) is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:43 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
issuing a non-competitive replacement
award to the Orange County Health
Department, Orlando, Florida, that will
ensure continuity of Part C, Early
Intervention Services (EIS), HIV/AIDS
care and treatment services to women,
infants, and children without disruption
from Orlando Health Incorporated’s
HUG–ME Program, in Orange County
and the surrounding areas.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Intended Recipient of the Award:
Orange County Health Department,
Orlando, Florida.
Amount of the Award: $303,018.00.
Period of Support: The period of the
supplemental support is from October 1,
2009, through March 31, 2010.
Authority: This activity is under the
authority of the Public Health Service
Act as amended, Section 2651 and 2693
of the Public Health Service Act, as
amended (2 USC 300ff–51 and 42 USC
300ff–121). The authority for the
exception to competition is HHS Grants
Policy Directive 2.04, Awarding Grants.
Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 93.918.
Justification for the Exception to
Competition: Critical funding for HIV/
AIDS care and treatment to the target
populations in Orange County, Orlando,
Florida, and surrounding areas will be
continued through a temporary, noncompetitive replacement award to the
Orange County Health Department as
the new recipient. This temporary
award is needed because the former
grantee, Orlando Health, Incorporated,
has relinquished, effective September
30, 2009, the HUG ME Program and the
HRSA Grant award supporting it
(original Project Period April 1, 2008,
through March 31, 2010). The Orange
County Health Department is known
Statewide as an exceptional site for
HIV/AIDS care and treatment services. It
has administered its own HRSA Ryan
White HIV/AIDS Program Part C EIS
Grant for the past 9 years and is well
suited to undertake operations of the
HUG–ME Program under the previously
approved scope of project activities.
Additionally, this organization has a
thorough understanding of the
characteristics and needs of HIV/AIDSinfected populations. The HIV/AIDS
Bureau (HAB) and its Division of
Community Based Programs are not
aware of any other organization that
could provide good quality care and
treatment services to the impacted
service populations without additional
time and resources being devoted to
bringing that organization’s service
capacity up to the level needed under
the project scope of this award. This
non-competitive replacement award
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
will permit the new recipient to ensure
continuity of services to the HIV/AIDSinfected populations. The supplemental
funding will provide support for 6
months. Additional funding beyond
March 31, 2010, will be provided
through a limited service area
competition that will be announced in
the future.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Parham Hopson, Associate
Administrator, HRSA/HAB, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland
20857; phone 301–443–1993;
DParham@hrsa.gov.
Dated: January 13, 2010.
Mary K. Wakefield,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–1179 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC
PRESERVATION
Draft Program Comment for the
Department of the Navy for the
Disposition of Historic Vessels
AGENCY: Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to issue
program comments for the Department
of the Navy for the disposition of
historic vessels.
SUMMARY: The Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation is considering
issuing a Program Comment for the
Department of the Navy setting forth the
way in which it will comply with
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act with regard to the
determination of National Register of
Historic Places eligibility of its vessels
and the treatment of adverse effects that
may result from their disposition.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
February 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this proposed Program
Comment to Dr. Tom McCulloch, Office
of Federal Agency Programs, Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation, 1100
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 803,
Washington, DC 20004. Fax (202) 606–
8647. You may submit electronic
comments to: tmcculloch@achp.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Tom McCulloch, (202) 606–8554,
tmcculloch@achp.gov.
Section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act requires Federal
agencies to consider the effects of their
undertakings on historic properties and
to provide the Advisory Council on
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Historic Preservation (ACHP) a
reasonable opportunity to comment
with regard to such undertakings. The
ACHP has issued the regulations that set
forth the process through which Federal
agencies comply with these duties.
Those regulations are codified under 36
CFR part 800 (Section 106 regulations).
Under Section 800.14(e) of those
regulations, agencies can request the
ACHP to provide a ‘‘Program Comment’’
on a particular category of undertakings
in lieu of conducting individual reviews
of each individual undertaking under
such category, as set forth in 36 CFR
800.4 through 800.7. An agency can
meet its Section 106 responsibilities
with regard to the effects of particular
aspects of those undertakings by taking
into account ACHP’s Program Comment
and following the steps set forth in that
comment.
I. Background
The ACHP is now considering issuing
a Program Comment to the Department
of the Navy (Navy) that would set forth
the way in which it will comply with
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act with regard to the
determination of National Register of
Historic Places (National Register)
eligibility of its vessels and the
treatment of adverse effects that may
result from their disposition.
As explained in the Program
Comment itself, naval vessels are the
ships and service craft built by and for
the Navy, used in furthering the Navy’s
military mission, and listed in the Naval
Vessel Register (NVR). Naval vessels are
an unusual type of historic property.
They are mobile assets that are put into
harm’s way and remain in active service
for typically less than fifty years.
Because naval vessels have a limited
useful life, the Chief of Naval
Operations undertakes a Ship
Disposition Review (SDR) each year to
determine whether any vessels should
be decommissioned from active service.
The total number of vessels to be
decommissioned varies from year to
year, but currently averages eight per
year.
Upon the decommissioning of a
vessel, the Secretary of the Navy is
authorized to strike the vessel from the
NVR. By the authority of the Secretary
of the Navy, stricken Navy vessels may
be: (1) Sold; (2) dismantled; (3)
transferred, by gift or otherwise, to any
State, Commonwealth, or possession of
the U.S., the District of Columbia, or
non-profit entity; (4) used for
experimental purposes, including Navy
sink exercises (SINKEXes); (5)
transferred, by gift or otherwise, to any
State, Commonwealth or possession of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:43 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
the U.S. for use as an artificial reef; or
(6) disposed to a foreign nation by sale,
lease, grant, loan, barter, transfer or
otherwise. These six methods of final
disposition, which are ‘‘undertakings’’
under Section 106, are available to the
Navy because it is neither cost effective
nor consistent with the Navy’s mission
to retain vessels that have surpassed
their useful life.
Under the Program Comment, the
Navy would apply the National Register
criteria to vessels in active service and
decommissioned vessels. That process
would include input from the public
and various historic preservation
stakeholders. The Program Comment
would establish a type of treatment that
would begin immediately from the time
a vessel is determined eligible, and thus,
well before a Navy decision to dispose
of the vessel. Finally, the Program
Comment would clarify that the Navy
will not need to conduct Section 106
reviews regarding effects to active
vessels.
Once the public comments resulting
from this notice are considered, and
edits are incorporated as deemed
appropriate, the ACHP will decide
whether to issue the Program Comment.
The ACHP expects to make that
decision at its upcoming quarterly
meeting currently scheduled on
February 24, 2010 in Washington, DC,
or shortly thereafter.
II. Text of the Proposed Program
Comment
The following is the text of the
proposed Program Comment, without
the Guideline appendices: PROGRAM
COMMENT PURSUANT TO 36 CFR
800.14(e) IMPLEMENTING SECTION
106 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC
PRESERVATION ACT FOR THE
EVALUATION OF VESSELS FOR
ELIGIBILITY FOR LISTING IN THE
NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC
PLACES AND THE TREATMENT OF
ELIGIBLE VESSELS TO RESOLVE
ADVERSE EFFECTS THAT MAY
RESULT FROM CERTAIN METHODS
OF FINAL DISPOSITION.
I. Introduction
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) requires Federal
agencies to ‘‘take into account the effect of
[an] undertaking on any . . . structure . . .
eligible for inclusion in the National
Register’’ and to ‘‘afford the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation . . . a reasonable
opportunity to comment with regard to such
undertaking.’’ Regulations promulgated by
the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation (ACHP) and codified at 36
C.F.R. Part 800 describe the procedures
Federal agencies must follow to meet their
Section 106 obligations. Under 36 C.F.R.
§ 800.14, the ACHP provides Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3747
agencies with ‘‘a variety of alternative
methods . . . to meet their Section 106
obligations,’’ thereby allowing agencies ‘‘to
tailor the Section 106 process to their needs’’
(65 FR 77698–01)
The following Program Comment was
proposed by the Navy, and issued by the
ACHP on (date to be determined), pursuant
to 36 C.F.R. § 800.14(e). The Program
Comment benefits the Navy and the historic
preservation stakeholders by providing the
Navy with a process for evaluating vessels to
determine eligibility for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
for Section 106 and Section 110 purposes.
The Program Comment also provides a
Section 106 method of treatment of eligible
vessels to resolve adverse effects that result
from certain methods of final disposition.
The Program Comment will enable Navy
decision-makers to apply the eligibility
criteria as defined by the National Park
Service (NPS) at 36 C.F.R. Part 60 to vessels
in active service and decommissioned
vessels. Furthermore, the Program Comment
will give the public and various historic
preservation stakeholders opportunities to
provide input regarding a vessel’s eligibility
for listing in the NRHP. The Program
Comment will establish a type of treatment
(i.e., collecting documentation in accordance
with Section IV of this Program) that will
begin immediately from the time a vessel is
determined eligible, and thus, well before a
Navy decision to dispose of the vessel.
Finally, the Program Comment will clarify
that the Navy will not need to conduct
Section 106 reviews regarding effects to
active vessels.
By implementing the Program Comment,
the Navy will no longer be required to follow
the standard Section 106 process for each
final disposition decision affecting inactive
vessels. In addition to satisfying the Navy’s
obligations under Section 106 of the NHPA
for vessels, the Program Comment enables
the Navy to fulfill its responsibility under
Section 110 of the NHPA to manage and
maintain vessels that may be eligible for
listing in the NRHP in a way that considers
the preservation of their historic value.
II. Background
Naval vessels are the ships and service
craft built by and for the Navy, used in
furthering the Navy’s military mission, and
listed in the Naval Vessel Register (NVR).
Naval vessels are an unusual type of historic
property. They are mobile assets that are put
into harm’s way and remain in active service
for typically less than fifty years. Because
naval vessels have a limited useful life, the
Chief of Naval Operations undertakes a Ship
Disposition Review (SDR) each year to
determine whether any vessels should be
decommissioned from active service. The
total number of vessels to be
decommissioned varies from year to year, but
currently averages eight per year. Upon the
decommissioning of a vessel, the Secretary of
the Navy is authorized, under 10 U.S.C.
§ 7304, to strike the vessel from the NVR. By
the authority of the Secretary of the Navy
under 10 U.S.C. § 7305–7307, stricken Navy
vessels may be: 1) sold; 2) dismantled; 3)
transferred, by gift or otherwise, to any State,
Commonwealth, or possession of the U.S.,
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
3748
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
the District of Columbia, or non-profit entity;
4) used for experimental purposes, including
Navy sink exercises (SINKEXes); 5)
transferred, by gift or otherwise, to any State,
Commonwealth or possession of the U.S. for
use as an artificial reef; or 6) disposed to a
foreign nation by sale, lease, grant, loan,
barter, transfer or otherwise. These six
methods of final disposition, which are
‘‘undertakings’’ as defined by 36 C.F.R.
§ 800.16(y), are available to the Navy because
it is neither cost effective nor consistent with
the Navy’s mission to retain vessels that have
surpassed their useful life.
III. Determining Eligibility for Listing in the
NRHP
A. Criteria
The Secretary of the Interior, through the
NPS, established four criteria pursuant to its
authority under the NHPA for determining
whether property is eligible for listing in the
NRHP. The four evaluation criteria are
codified at 36 C.F.R. § 60.4 and listed below.
The Navy is required to evaluate vessels for
eligibility for listing in the NRHP using the
four evaluation criteria:
i. are associated with events that have
made a significant contribution to the broad
patterns of our history;
ii. are associated with the lives of persons
significant in our past;
iii. embody the distinctive characteristics
of a type, period, or method of construction;
or
iv. have yielded, or may be likely to yield,
information important in prehistory or
history.
Navy vessels that meet one or more of
these criteria, and that continue to possess
integrity of (as appropriate) design, materials,
workmanship, feeling and/or association are
eligible for listing in the NRHP.
Recognizing that vessels have a limited
useful life of typically less than fifty years,
the Navy has determined that, for Section
106 and Section 110 purposes, vessels
possessing any of the following
characteristics at any time, including during
active service, are of exceptional importance
and meet the listing eligibility criteria
established by the NPS and codified at 36
C.F.R. § 60.4:
i. The vessel was awarded an individual
Presidential Unit Citation. (A Presidential
Unit Citation is awarded to military units
that have performed an extremely
meritorious or heroic act, usually in the face
of an armed enemy.)
ii. An individual act of heroism took place
aboard the vessel such that an individual was
subsequently awarded the Medal of Honor or
the Navy Cross. (The Medal of Honor is
awarded for valor in action against an enemy
force. The Navy Cross is awarded for
extraordinary heroism in action not justifying
an award of the Medal of Honor.)
iii. A President of the United States was
assigned to the vessel during his or her naval
service.
iv. The vessel was the first to incorporate
engineering, weapons systems, or other
upgrades that represent a revolutionary
change in naval design or warfighting
capabilities, or other special and unique
considerations.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:43 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
v. Some other historic or socially
significant event occurred on the vessel.
B. Process
Each year, qualified Navy historians with
knowledge about Navy vessels will review
each vessel in active service to determine
which, if any, possess any of the
characteristics described above, and integrity,
and therefore, will be determined eligible for
listing in the NRHP.
Upon decommissioning, those vessels that
have not already been determined eligible for
listing in the NRHP will be evaluated by
qualified Navy historians with knowledge
about Navy vessels in accordance with the
listing eligibility criteria established by the
NPS, including whether the vessels possess
integrity, and informed by the above, and
thus, prior to making any final disposition
decision with the potential to adversely affect
historic property.
Depending on the availability of funds, the
Navy may also develop type-specific context
studies to determine NRHP listing eligibility
of classes of vessels. Context studies shall be
consistent with the eligibility criteria noted
above and with the NPS publications ‘‘How
to Apply the National Register Criteria for
Evaluation,’’ ‘‘How to Complete the National
Register Multiple Property Documentation
Form,’’ and ‘‘Nominating Historic Vessels and
Shipwrecks to the National Register of
Historic Places.’’ Vessels will be analyzed by
class and the appropriate historic
preservation stakeholders will be consulted
on appropriate application of the National
Register criteria. In the event that context
studies are developed, they will be made
available to the public in accordance with
Section IV of this Program.
C. Participation by Historic Preservation
Stakeholders
The Navy encourages historic preservation
stakeholders, including but not limited to the
ACHP, the NPS, State Historic Preservation
Officers (SHPO), the National Conference of
State Historic Preservation Officers
(NCSHPO), the National Trust for Historic
Preservation (National Trust), and the public
to participate in the process for determining
whether a vessel meets the eligibility criteria
for listing in the NRHP. Through its existing
public outreach programs the Navy will
invite the public and historic preservation
stakeholders to provide written comments
and justification that support determining a
vessel eligible for listing in the NRHP.
After the annual SDR, the Navy provides
a list of vessels planned to be
decommissioned over the next five years in
a Report to Congress on the Annual LongRange Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels.
Subsequent to the release of the annual
report to Congress, the Navy will provide
statements of eligibility or ineligibility for
listing in the NRHP on its website for those
vessels to be decommissioned in the
forthcoming year. The Navy will then solicit
written comments on those statements of
eligibility or ineligibility for listing in the
NRHP from historic preservation
stakeholders via its website. Historic
preservation stakeholders will have sixty
days from the time of publication of the list
of vessels to be decommissioned to provide
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
their comments. The Navy will notify
historic preservation stakeholders, including
the Historic Naval Ships Association (HNSA)
and other Veterans-affiliated organizations, of
the beginning of the sixty-day period. All
written comments should be mailed to the
Naval History and Heritage Command
(NHHC) or submitted electronically via the
NHHC’s website. The Navy will consider all
written comments received before making a
final determination as to whether a vessel is
eligible for listing in the NRHP. If the Navy
determines no question exists as to whether
a vessel is eligible for listing in the NRHP,
then the Navy will publish its final
determination of listing eligibility for each
vessel on its website. If the Navy determines
that a question exists as to whether a vessel
is eligible for listing in the NRHP, or if the
ACHP or the Secretary of the Interior so
request, the Navy will seek a formal
determination of eligibility from the Keeper.
Upon review, the Keeper’s determination of
listing eligibility shall be final.
An historic preservation stakeholder may
also comment on a vessel’s eligibility or
ineligibility for listing in the NRHP in writing
while the vessel is in active service. These
comments should be mailed to the NHHC or
submitted electronically via the NHHC’s
website. The NHHC will acknowledge receipt
of the comments in writing, and retain the
comments for consideration when preparing
the statement of eligibility or ineligibility for
the vessel prior to the vessel’s scheduled
decommissioning.
D. Effect of Eligibility Determination on
Active Vessels
A determination that a vessel in active
service is eligible for listing in the NRHP
shall not affect the vessel’s availability for
routine operations, combat operations, and
modernization to keep the vessel battleworthy, safe, and habitable, as required by
the Navy’s military mission. Specifically, the
Navy shall employ, deploy, activate,
inactivate, repair, modify, move and
decommission such vessels without regard to
their eligibility and without needing to
consider effects to them under Section 106 of
the NHPA.
IV. Treatment of Vessels Determined to be
Eligible for Listing in the NRHP
The Navy will take the following steps
regarding vessels determined to be eligible
for listing in the NRHP during active service
or upon decommissioning:
i. Annotate the vessel’s entry in the NVR
to reflect listing eligibility and include the
basis for eligibility (the public can access the
NVR at https://www.nvr.navy.mil); and
ii. Make available a documentation
package consisting of historically significant
records such as command operation reports,
war diaries, and deck logs, as they are
submitted (the public would be able to access
the documentation package at the NHHC;
unclassified command operation reports will
be available at https://www.history.navy.mil).
The Navy will also strongly consider
making the vessel available for donation only
upon decommissioning and striking from the
NVR pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 7306 for up to
two years unless:
i. The vessel is designated for Foreign
Military Sales (FMS) transfer;
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
ii. There are other Navy requirements for
its continued use;
iii. The material condition of the vessel
precludes donation;
iv. National security or other restrictions
preclude donation; or
v. The vessel is nuclear powered.
(Additional coordination with the Director,
Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program is
required to determine donation feasibility.)
The Navy’s Ship Donation Program is
described at https://peoships.crane.navy.mil/
donation/. Donation application
requirements include submission of
acceptable curatorial/museum and
maintenance plans among other plans for the
preservation of the vessel in a condition
satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy. If a
qualified donee is not identified within two
years, the Navy may remove the vessel from
donation hold status and proceed with
another method of final disposition.
Contracts between the Navy and qualified
donees include provisions that address
historic preservation of the vessel.
The Navy will publish a list of vessels
available for donation in the Federal Register
and at https://peoships.crane.navy.mil/
donation/. The list will include any NRHP
eligible vessel initially precluded from
donation that, due to a change in status,
becomes available for donation.
The Navy will take the following steps
regarding decommissioned vessels
determined eligible for listing in the NRHP
before final disposition by a method other
than donation:
i. Give priority to compiling histories of
these eligible vessels when preparing entries
in the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting
Ships;
ii. Retain and, depending on classification,
provide public access to historical
documentation from NRHP eligible vessels
such as command operation reports, war
diaries, and ship deck logs at the NHHC
(deck logs that are more than thirty years old
are transferred to the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA) for
pemanent retention);
iii. In addition to the standard curator
items removed from the vessel upon
decommissioning in accordance with
required Navy policy, including citations,
correspondence of significant historical
value, ship histories, paintings, ship silver
services, and photographs selected to best
display the physical characteristics of the
vessel, the Navy would make the vessel
available to the Navy Curator and eligible
non-profit organizations for removal of
additional equipment, parts of the vessel, etc.
that contribute to the historical significance
of the vessel. Items removed by the Navy
Curator will be maintained and considered
for loan to qualified U.S. non-profit
organizations in accordance with 10 U.S.C.
§ 2572, 4575; and
iv. Within three years of designating a
NRHP-eligible vessel for final disposition,
deposit with the NARA documentation
consisting of archivally stable media of the
following items:
a. A Booklet of General Plans; and
b. The last report of the Board of Inspection
and Survey describing the material condition
of the vessel.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:43 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Note that accessibility to the public will
depend on the document’s classification and
NARA policies.
V. Reports
The Navy will submit an annual report to
the NCSHPO and the ACHP on the progress
of this Program Comment on 1 December,
annually. The report will include the
following information:
i. The names and status of active vessels
identified as eligible for listing in the NRHP,
and the basis for their eligibility;
ii. The names and status of
decommissioned vessels identified as eligible
for listing in the NRHP, and a copy of the
statement of eligibility;
iii. The names and status of
decommissioned vessels identified as
ineligible for listing in the NRHP, and a copy
of the statement of ineligibility; and
iv. The names of the vessels eligible for
listing in the NRHP whose final disposition
occurred during the reporting period, along
with the status of the documentation
supporting final disposition.
The annual report will also be made
available to the public on the Navy’s
donation website.
VI. Effect of the Program Comment
By following this Program Comment, the
Navy will meet its responsibilities for
compliance with Section 110, in part, and
Section 106 of the NHPA concerning the
evaluation of vessels for eligibility for listing
in the NRHP and the final disposition of
eligible vessels. Accordingly, the Navy will
no longer be required to follow the standard
Section 106 process for each final disposition
decision affecting inactive vessels, except as
provided in this Program Comment.
Vessels already determined eligible for
listing in the NRHP that are not subject to an
existing agreement established through the
Section 106 consultation process will be
subject to this Program Comment as if their
eligibility had been established as a result of
this Program Comment. Vessels that are the
subject of an existing agreement established
pursuant to the Section 106 regulations will
continue to be subject to that existing
agreement.
The Program Comment described herein
will remain in effect for twenty years, unless
and until the Navy decides to terminate its
application or the ACHP ‘‘determines that the
consideration of historic [vessels] is not being
carried out in a manner consistent with the
program comment’’ and withdraws the
comment. (36 C.F.R. § 800.14(e) (6)).
Upon either event, the Navy shall comply
with the requirements of 36 C.F.R. Part 800
for each undertaking within the scope of this
Program Comment. The Navy shall inform
historic preservation stakeholders of the
Program Comment’s termination.
The Navy shall reexamine the Program
Comment’s effectiveness after the first year of
implementation and every five years
thereafter within the context of its annual
report or by convening a meeting with
historic preservation stakeholders. In
reexamining the Program Comment’s
effectiveness, the Navy shall consider any
written recommendations for improvement
submitted by historic preservation
stakeholders to the NHHC.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3749
Once in effect, the Program Comment may
be amended when such an amendment is
agreed to in writing by the Navy and the
ACHP. The amendment will be effective on
the date a copy of the amended Program
Comment signed by the Navy and the ACHP
is filed with the ACHP.
Appendix A
Definitions
a. Command Operation Report, formerly
Command History Report means a report that
covers the operational and administrative
actions of the command for each calendar
year and usually consists of a chronology, a
narrative, and enclosures. Some Command
Operation Reports are classified for a set
period of time.
b. Decommission means to remove a vessel
from active service.
c. Documentation package means a
compilation of historically significant records
including, but not limited to, command
operation reports, war diaries, and deck logs.
d. Effect means alteration to the
characteristics of a historic property
qualifying it for inclusion in or eligibility for
the National Register.
e. Historic Preservation Stakeholder means
the ACHP, the NPS, SHPOs, NCSHPO, the
National Trust, any other agency or
organization specifically concerned with
historic preservation issues, and the public.
f. Naval Vessel Register means the official
inventory of ships and service craft titled to
or in the custody of the U.S. Navy. It includes
information about vessels from the time of
their authorization through their life cycle
and final disposition.
g. Ship deck log means a daily chronology
of particular events for administrative and
legal purposes, as set forth by the Office of
the Chief of Naval Operations Instruction
3100.7 series.
h. Ship disposition review means an
annual review of vessels in active service
conducted by the Chief of Naval Operations
to determine which vessels will be
decommissioned from active service and
retained for potential reactivation or stricken
from the Naval Vessel Register and
designated for disposal.
i. Stricken vessel means a decommissioned
vessel that has been removed from the Naval
Vessel Register.
j. Undertaking means a project, activity, or
program funded in whole or in part under the
direct or indirect jurisdiction of a Federal
agency, including those carried out by or on
behalf of a Federal agency; those carried out
with Federal financial assistance; and those
requiring a Federal permit, license or
approval.
k. Vessel means the ships and service craft
built by and for the Navy, used in furthering
the Navy’s military mission, and listed in the
Naval Vessel Register. Vessel does not
include those vessels retained in Navy
custody for public display (i.e., USS
CONSTITUTION, NAUTILUS (SSN 571), exBARRY (DD 933)).
1. War diary means a ship’s recounting of
wartime operations. Some war diaries are
written in a cursory fashion. Others are
works of literary art. War diaries for combat
actions are included with the Command
Operations Report.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
3750
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices
Authority: 36 CFR 800.14(e).
Dated: January 14, 2010.
John M. Fowler,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–1023 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–K6–M
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Docket ID: FEMA–2007–0008]
National Advisory Council Meeting
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of the National Advisory
Committee meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
date, time, location, and agenda for the
next meeting of the National Advisory
Council (NAC). At the meeting, the
subcommittees will report on their work
since the July 29–30, 2009 meeting. This
meeting will be open to the public.
DATES: Meeting Dates: Wednesday,
February 10, 2010, from approximately
10 a.m. EST to 5:45 p.m. EST and
Thursday, February 11, 2010, 8:30 a.m.
EST to 3:30 p.m. EST. A public
comment period will take place on the
afternoon of February 11, 2010, between
approximately 2:30 p.m. EST and 3 p.m.
EST.
Comment Date: Persons wishing to
make an oral presentation, or who are
unable to attend or speak at the meeting,
may submit written comments. Written
comments or requests to make oral
presentations must be received by
February 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Holiday Inn Capitol, 550 C Street
SW., Washington, DC 20024. Written
comments and requests to make oral
presentations at the meeting should be
provided to the address listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
and must be received by February 3,
2010. All submissions received must
include the Docket ID FEMA–2007–
0008 and may be submitted by any one
of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on the Web site.
E-mail: FEMA–RULES@dhs.gov.
Include Docket ID FEMA–2007–0008 in
the subject line of the message.
Facsimile: (703) 483–2999.
Mail: Office of Chief Counsel, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Room
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:43 Jan 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
835, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472–3100.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Office of Chief
Counsel, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Room 835, 500 C
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472–
3100.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID FEMA–
2007–0008. Comments received also
will be posted without alteration at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read documents or comments received
by the National Advisory Council, go to
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Breese Eddy, Alternate Designated
Federal Officer, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
(Room 832), Washington, DC 20472–
3100, telephone 202–646–3746, fax
202–646–3930, and e-mail to: FEMA–
NAC@dhs.gov. The NAC Web site is
located at: https://www.fema.gov/about/
nac/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of
this meeting is required under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), Public Law 92–463, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App. 1 et seq.). The
National Advisory Council (NAC) will
meet for the purpose of reviewing the
progress and/or potential
recommendations of the following NAC
subcommittees: Stafford Act, National
Response Framework, National Incident
Management System, Post-Disaster
Housing, Special Needs, Public/Private
Partnerships, and Target Capabilities
List. The Council may receive updates
on preparedness issues, mitigation
issues, the National Disaster Recovery
Framework, and the Regional Advisory
Councils.
Public Attendance: The meeting is
open to the public. Please note that the
meeting may adjourn early if all
business is finished. Persons with
disabilities who require special
assistance should advise the Alternate
Designated Federal Officer of their
anticipated special needs as early as
possible. Members of the public who
wish to make comments on Thursday,
February 11, 2010 between 2:30 p.m.
EST and 3 p.m. EST are requested to
register in advance, and if the meeting
is running ahead of schedule the public
comment period may take place at 1
p.m. EST; therefore, all speakers must
be present and seated by 12:15 p.m.
EST. In order to allow as many people
as possible to speak, speakers are
requested to limit their remarks to 3
minutes. For those wishing to submit
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
written comments, please follow the
procedure noted above.
Dated: January 14, 2010.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010–1170 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–48–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5375–N–03]
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
To Assist the Homeless
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This Notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 7266, Washington,
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234;
TTY number for the hearing- and
speech-impaired (202) 708–2565 (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information line
at 800–927–7588.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with 24 CFR part 581 and
section 501 of the Stewart B. McKinney
Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.
11411), as amended, HUD is publishing
this Notice to identify Federal buildings
and other real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. The properties were
reviewed using information provided to
HUD by Federal landholding agencies
regarding unutilized and underutilized
buildings and real property controlled
by such agencies or by GSA regarding
its inventory of excess or surplus
Federal property. This Notice is also
published in order to comply with the
December 12, 1988 Court Order in
National Coalition for the Homeless v.
Veterans Administration, No. 88–2503–
OG (D.D.C.).
Properties reviewed are listed in this
Notice according to the following
categories: Suitable/available, suitable/
unavailable, suitable/to be excess, and
unsuitable. The properties listed in the
three suitable categories have been
reviewed by the landholding agencies,
and each agency has transmitted to
HUD: (1) Its intention to make the
property available for use to assist the
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3746-3750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1023]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Draft Program Comment for the Department of the Navy for the
Disposition of Historic Vessels
AGENCY: Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to issue program comments for the Department
of the Navy for the disposition of historic vessels.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation is considering
issuing a Program Comment for the Department of the Navy setting forth
the way in which it will comply with Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act with regard to the determination of National
Register of Historic Places eligibility of its vessels and the
treatment of adverse effects that may result from their disposition.
DATES: Submit comments on or before February 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this proposed Program
Comment to Dr. Tom McCulloch, Office of Federal Agency Programs,
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Suite 803, Washington, DC 20004. Fax (202) 606-8647. You may
submit electronic comments to: tmcculloch@achp.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Tom McCulloch, (202) 606-8554,
tmcculloch@achp.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of
their undertakings on historic properties and to provide the Advisory
Council on
[[Page 3747]]
Historic Preservation (ACHP) a reasonable opportunity to comment with
regard to such undertakings. The ACHP has issued the regulations that
set forth the process through which Federal agencies comply with these
duties. Those regulations are codified under 36 CFR part 800 (Section
106 regulations).
Under Section 800.14(e) of those regulations, agencies can request
the ACHP to provide a ``Program Comment'' on a particular category of
undertakings in lieu of conducting individual reviews of each
individual undertaking under such category, as set forth in 36 CFR
800.4 through 800.7. An agency can meet its Section 106
responsibilities with regard to the effects of particular aspects of
those undertakings by taking into account ACHP's Program Comment and
following the steps set forth in that comment.
I. Background
The ACHP is now considering issuing a Program Comment to the
Department of the Navy (Navy) that would set forth the way in which it
will comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
with regard to the determination of National Register of Historic
Places (National Register) eligibility of its vessels and the treatment
of adverse effects that may result from their disposition.
As explained in the Program Comment itself, naval vessels are the
ships and service craft built by and for the Navy, used in furthering
the Navy's military mission, and listed in the Naval Vessel Register
(NVR). Naval vessels are an unusual type of historic property. They are
mobile assets that are put into harm's way and remain in active service
for typically less than fifty years. Because naval vessels have a
limited useful life, the Chief of Naval Operations undertakes a Ship
Disposition Review (SDR) each year to determine whether any vessels
should be decommissioned from active service. The total number of
vessels to be decommissioned varies from year to year, but currently
averages eight per year.
Upon the decommissioning of a vessel, the Secretary of the Navy is
authorized to strike the vessel from the NVR. By the authority of the
Secretary of the Navy, stricken Navy vessels may be: (1) Sold; (2)
dismantled; (3) transferred, by gift or otherwise, to any State,
Commonwealth, or possession of the U.S., the District of Columbia, or
non-profit entity; (4) used for experimental purposes, including Navy
sink exercises (SINKEXes); (5) transferred, by gift or otherwise, to
any State, Commonwealth or possession of the U.S. for use as an
artificial reef; or (6) disposed to a foreign nation by sale, lease,
grant, loan, barter, transfer or otherwise. These six methods of final
disposition, which are ``undertakings'' under Section 106, are
available to the Navy because it is neither cost effective nor
consistent with the Navy's mission to retain vessels that have
surpassed their useful life.
Under the Program Comment, the Navy would apply the National
Register criteria to vessels in active service and decommissioned
vessels. That process would include input from the public and various
historic preservation stakeholders. The Program Comment would establish
a type of treatment that would begin immediately from the time a vessel
is determined eligible, and thus, well before a Navy decision to
dispose of the vessel. Finally, the Program Comment would clarify that
the Navy will not need to conduct Section 106 reviews regarding effects
to active vessels.
Once the public comments resulting from this notice are considered,
and edits are incorporated as deemed appropriate, the ACHP will decide
whether to issue the Program Comment. The ACHP expects to make that
decision at its upcoming quarterly meeting currently scheduled on
February 24, 2010 in Washington, DC, or shortly thereafter.
II. Text of the Proposed Program Comment
The following is the text of the proposed Program Comment, without
the Guideline appendices: PROGRAM COMMENT PURSUANT TO 36 CFR 800.14(e)
IMPLEMENTING SECTION 106 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT FOR
THE EVALUATION OF VESSELS FOR ELIGIBILITY FOR LISTING IN THE NATIONAL
REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES AND THE TREATMENT OF ELIGIBLE VESSELS TO
RESOLVE ADVERSE EFFECTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM CERTAIN METHODS OF FINAL
DISPOSITION.
I. Introduction
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)
requires Federal agencies to ``take into account the effect of [an]
undertaking on any . . . structure . . . eligible for inclusion in
the National Register'' and to ``afford the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation . . . a reasonable opportunity to comment with
regard to such undertaking.'' Regulations promulgated by the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) and codified at 36
C.F.R. Part 800 describe the procedures Federal agencies must follow
to meet their Section 106 obligations. Under 36 C.F.R. Sec. 800.14,
the ACHP provides Federal agencies with ``a variety of alternative
methods . . . to meet their Section 106 obligations,'' thereby
allowing agencies ``to tailor the Section 106 process to their
needs'' (65 FR 77698-01)
The following Program Comment was proposed by the Navy, and
issued by the ACHP on (date to be determined), pursuant to 36 C.F.R.
Sec. 800.14(e). The Program Comment benefits the Navy and the
historic preservation stakeholders by providing the Navy with a
process for evaluating vessels to determine eligibility for listing
in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) for Section 106
and Section 110 purposes. The Program Comment also provides a
Section 106 method of treatment of eligible vessels to resolve
adverse effects that result from certain methods of final
disposition. The Program Comment will enable Navy decision-makers to
apply the eligibility criteria as defined by the National Park
Service (NPS) at 36 C.F.R. Part 60 to vessels in active service and
decommissioned vessels. Furthermore, the Program Comment will give
the public and various historic preservation stakeholders
opportunities to provide input regarding a vessel's eligibility for
listing in the NRHP. The Program Comment will establish a type of
treatment (i.e., collecting documentation in accordance with Section
IV of this Program) that will begin immediately from the time a
vessel is determined eligible, and thus, well before a Navy decision
to dispose of the vessel. Finally, the Program Comment will clarify
that the Navy will not need to conduct Section 106 reviews regarding
effects to active vessels.
By implementing the Program Comment, the Navy will no longer be
required to follow the standard Section 106 process for each final
disposition decision affecting inactive vessels. In addition to
satisfying the Navy's obligations under Section 106 of the NHPA for
vessels, the Program Comment enables the Navy to fulfill its
responsibility under Section 110 of the NHPA to manage and maintain
vessels that may be eligible for listing in the NRHP in a way that
considers the preservation of their historic value.
II. Background
Naval vessels are the ships and service craft built by and for
the Navy, used in furthering the Navy's military mission, and listed
in the Naval Vessel Register (NVR). Naval vessels are an unusual
type of historic property. They are mobile assets that are put into
harm's way and remain in active service for typically less than
fifty years. Because naval vessels have a limited useful life, the
Chief of Naval Operations undertakes a Ship Disposition Review (SDR)
each year to determine whether any vessels should be decommissioned
from active service. The total number of vessels to be
decommissioned varies from year to year, but currently averages
eight per year. Upon the decommissioning of a vessel, the Secretary
of the Navy is authorized, under 10 U.S.C. Sec. 7304, to strike the
vessel from the NVR. By the authority of the Secretary of the Navy
under 10 U.S.C. Sec. 7305-7307, stricken Navy vessels may be: 1)
sold; 2) dismantled; 3) transferred, by gift or otherwise, to any
State, Commonwealth, or possession of the U.S.,
[[Page 3748]]
the District of Columbia, or non-profit entity; 4) used for
experimental purposes, including Navy sink exercises (SINKEXes); 5)
transferred, by gift or otherwise, to any State, Commonwealth or
possession of the U.S. for use as an artificial reef; or 6) disposed
to a foreign nation by sale, lease, grant, loan, barter, transfer or
otherwise. These six methods of final disposition, which are
``undertakings'' as defined by 36 C.F.R. Sec. 800.16(y), are
available to the Navy because it is neither cost effective nor
consistent with the Navy's mission to retain vessels that have
surpassed their useful life.
III. Determining Eligibility for Listing in the NRHP
A. Criteria
The Secretary of the Interior, through the NPS, established four
criteria pursuant to its authority under the NHPA for determining
whether property is eligible for listing in the NRHP. The four
evaluation criteria are codified at 36 C.F.R. Sec. 60.4 and listed
below. The Navy is required to evaluate vessels for eligibility for
listing in the NRHP using the four evaluation criteria:
i. are associated with events that have made a significant
contribution to the broad patterns of our history;
ii. are associated with the lives of persons significant in our
past;
iii. embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period,
or method of construction; or
iv. have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information
important in prehistory or history.
Navy vessels that meet one or more of these criteria, and that
continue to possess integrity of (as appropriate) design, materials,
workmanship, feeling and/or association are eligible for listing in
the NRHP.
Recognizing that vessels have a limited useful life of typically
less than fifty years, the Navy has determined that, for Section 106
and Section 110 purposes, vessels possessing any of the following
characteristics at any time, including during active service, are of
exceptional importance and meet the listing eligibility criteria
established by the NPS and codified at 36 C.F.R. Sec. 60.4:
i. The vessel was awarded an individual Presidential Unit
Citation. (A Presidential Unit Citation is awarded to military units
that have performed an extremely meritorious or heroic act, usually
in the face of an armed enemy.)
ii. An individual act of heroism took place aboard the vessel
such that an individual was subsequently awarded the Medal of Honor
or the Navy Cross. (The Medal of Honor is awarded for valor in
action against an enemy force. The Navy Cross is awarded for
extraordinary heroism in action not justifying an award of the Medal
of Honor.)
iii. A President of the United States was assigned to the vessel
during his or her naval service.
iv. The vessel was the first to incorporate engineering, weapons
systems, or other upgrades that represent a revolutionary change in
naval design or warfighting capabilities, or other special and
unique considerations.
v. Some other historic or socially significant event occurred on
the vessel.
B. Process
Each year, qualified Navy historians with knowledge about Navy
vessels will review each vessel in active service to determine
which, if any, possess any of the characteristics described above,
and integrity, and therefore, will be determined eligible for
listing in the NRHP.
Upon decommissioning, those vessels that have not already been
determined eligible for listing in the NRHP will be evaluated by
qualified Navy historians with knowledge about Navy vessels in
accordance with the listing eligibility criteria established by the
NPS, including whether the vessels possess integrity, and informed
by the above, and thus, prior to making any final disposition
decision with the potential to adversely affect historic property.
Depending on the availability of funds, the Navy may also
develop type-specific context studies to determine NRHP listing
eligibility of classes of vessels. Context studies shall be
consistent with the eligibility criteria noted above and with the
NPS publications ``How to Apply the National Register Criteria for
Evaluation,'' ``How to Complete the National Register Multiple
Property Documentation Form,'' and ``Nominating Historic Vessels and
Shipwrecks to the National Register of Historic Places.'' Vessels
will be analyzed by class and the appropriate historic preservation
stakeholders will be consulted on appropriate application of the
National Register criteria. In the event that context studies are
developed, they will be made available to the public in accordance
with Section IV of this Program.
C. Participation by Historic Preservation Stakeholders
The Navy encourages historic preservation stakeholders,
including but not limited to the ACHP, the NPS, State Historic
Preservation Officers (SHPO), the National Conference of State
Historic Preservation Officers (NCSHPO), the National Trust for
Historic Preservation (National Trust), and the public to
participate in the process for determining whether a vessel meets
the eligibility criteria for listing in the NRHP. Through its
existing public outreach programs the Navy will invite the public
and historic preservation stakeholders to provide written comments
and justification that support determining a vessel eligible for
listing in the NRHP.
After the annual SDR, the Navy provides a list of vessels
planned to be decommissioned over the next five years in a Report to
Congress on the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval
Vessels. Subsequent to the release of the annual report to Congress,
the Navy will provide statements of eligibility or ineligibility for
listing in the NRHP on its website for those vessels to be
decommissioned in the forthcoming year. The Navy will then solicit
written comments on those statements of eligibility or ineligibility
for listing in the NRHP from historic preservation stakeholders via
its website. Historic preservation stakeholders will have sixty days
from the time of publication of the list of vessels to be
decommissioned to provide their comments. The Navy will notify
historic preservation stakeholders, including the Historic Naval
Ships Association (HNSA) and other Veterans-affiliated
organizations, of the beginning of the sixty-day period. All written
comments should be mailed to the Naval History and Heritage Command
(NHHC) or submitted electronically via the NHHC's website. The Navy
will consider all written comments received before making a final
determination as to whether a vessel is eligible for listing in the
NRHP. If the Navy determines no question exists as to whether a
vessel is eligible for listing in the NRHP, then the Navy will
publish its final determination of listing eligibility for each
vessel on its website. If the Navy determines that a question exists
as to whether a vessel is eligible for listing in the NRHP, or if
the ACHP or the Secretary of the Interior so request, the Navy will
seek a formal determination of eligibility from the Keeper. Upon
review, the Keeper's determination of listing eligibility shall be
final.
An historic preservation stakeholder may also comment on a
vessel's eligibility or ineligibility for listing in the NRHP in
writing while the vessel is in active service. These comments should
be mailed to the NHHC or submitted electronically via the NHHC's
website. The NHHC will acknowledge receipt of the comments in
writing, and retain the comments for consideration when preparing
the statement of eligibility or ineligibility for the vessel prior
to the vessel's scheduled decommissioning.
D. Effect of Eligibility Determination on Active Vessels
A determination that a vessel in active service is eligible for
listing in the NRHP shall not affect the vessel's availability for
routine operations, combat operations, and modernization to keep the
vessel battle-worthy, safe, and habitable, as required by the Navy's
military mission. Specifically, the Navy shall employ, deploy,
activate, inactivate, repair, modify, move and decommission such
vessels without regard to their eligibility and without needing to
consider effects to them under Section 106 of the NHPA.
IV. Treatment of Vessels Determined to be Eligible for Listing in the
NRHP
The Navy will take the following steps regarding vessels
determined to be eligible for listing in the NRHP during active
service or upon decommissioning:
i. Annotate the vessel's entry in the NVR to reflect listing
eligibility and include the basis for eligibility (the public can
access the NVR at https://www.nvr.navy.mil); and
ii. Make available a documentation package consisting of
historically significant records such as command operation reports,
war diaries, and deck logs, as they are submitted (the public would
be able to access the documentation package at the NHHC;
unclassified command operation reports will be available at https://www.history.navy.mil).
The Navy will also strongly consider making the vessel available
for donation only upon decommissioning and striking from the NVR
pursuant to 10 U.S.C. Sec. 7306 for up to two years unless:
i. The vessel is designated for Foreign Military Sales (FMS)
transfer;
[[Page 3749]]
ii. There are other Navy requirements for its continued use;
iii. The material condition of the vessel precludes donation;
iv. National security or other restrictions preclude donation;
or
v. The vessel is nuclear powered. (Additional coordination with
the Director, Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program is required to
determine donation feasibility.)
The Navy's Ship Donation Program is described at https://peoships.crane.navy.mil/donation/. Donation application requirements
include submission of acceptable curatorial/museum and maintenance
plans among other plans for the preservation of the vessel in a
condition satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy. If a qualified
donee is not identified within two years, the Navy may remove the
vessel from donation hold status and proceed with another method of
final disposition. Contracts between the Navy and qualified donees
include provisions that address historic preservation of the vessel.
The Navy will publish a list of vessels available for donation
in the Federal Register and at https://peoships.crane.navy.mil/donation/. The list will include any NRHP eligible vessel initially
precluded from donation that, due to a change in status, becomes
available for donation.
The Navy will take the following steps regarding decommissioned
vessels determined eligible for listing in the NRHP before final
disposition by a method other than donation:
i. Give priority to compiling histories of these eligible
vessels when preparing entries in the Dictionary of American Naval
Fighting Ships;
ii. Retain and, depending on classification, provide public
access to historical documentation from NRHP eligible vessels such
as command operation reports, war diaries, and ship deck logs at the
NHHC (deck logs that are more than thirty years old are transferred
to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for
pemanent retention);
iii. In addition to the standard curator items removed from the
vessel upon decommissioning in accordance with required Navy policy,
including citations, correspondence of significant historical value,
ship histories, paintings, ship silver services, and photographs
selected to best display the physical characteristics of the vessel,
the Navy would make the vessel available to the Navy Curator and
eligible non-profit organizations for removal of additional
equipment, parts of the vessel, etc. that contribute to the
historical significance of the vessel. Items removed by the Navy
Curator will be maintained and considered for loan to qualified U.S.
non-profit organizations in accordance with 10 U.S.C. Sec. 2572,
4575; and
iv. Within three years of designating a NRHP-eligible vessel for
final disposition, deposit with the NARA documentation consisting of
archivally stable media of the following items:
a. A Booklet of General Plans; and
b. The last report of the Board of Inspection and Survey
describing the material condition of the vessel.
Note that accessibility to the public will depend on the
document's classification and NARA policies.
V. Reports
The Navy will submit an annual report to the NCSHPO and the ACHP
on the progress of this Program Comment on 1 December, annually. The
report will include the following information:
i. The names and status of active vessels identified as eligible
for listing in the NRHP, and the basis for their eligibility;
ii. The names and status of decommissioned vessels identified as
eligible for listing in the NRHP, and a copy of the statement of
eligibility;
iii. The names and status of decommissioned vessels identified
as ineligible for listing in the NRHP, and a copy of the statement
of ineligibility; and
iv. The names of the vessels eligible for listing in the NRHP
whose final disposition occurred during the reporting period, along
with the status of the documentation supporting final disposition.
The annual report will also be made available to the public on
the Navy's donation website.
VI. Effect of the Program Comment
By following this Program Comment, the Navy will meet its
responsibilities for compliance with Section 110, in part, and
Section 106 of the NHPA concerning the evaluation of vessels for
eligibility for listing in the NRHP and the final disposition of
eligible vessels. Accordingly, the Navy will no longer be required
to follow the standard Section 106 process for each final
disposition decision affecting inactive vessels, except as provided
in this Program Comment.
Vessels already determined eligible for listing in the NRHP that
are not subject to an existing agreement established through the
Section 106 consultation process will be subject to this Program
Comment as if their eligibility had been established as a result of
this Program Comment. Vessels that are the subject of an existing
agreement established pursuant to the Section 106 regulations will
continue to be subject to that existing agreement.
The Program Comment described herein will remain in effect for
twenty years, unless and until the Navy decides to terminate its
application or the ACHP ``determines that the consideration of
historic [vessels] is not being carried out in a manner consistent
with the program comment'' and withdraws the comment. (36 C.F.R.
Sec. 800.14(e) (6)).
Upon either event, the Navy shall comply with the requirements
of 36 C.F.R. Part 800 for each undertaking within the scope of this
Program Comment. The Navy shall inform historic preservation
stakeholders of the Program Comment's termination.
The Navy shall reexamine the Program Comment's effectiveness
after the first year of implementation and every five years
thereafter within the context of its annual report or by convening a
meeting with historic preservation stakeholders. In reexamining the
Program Comment's effectiveness, the Navy shall consider any written
recommendations for improvement submitted by historic preservation
stakeholders to the NHHC.
Once in effect, the Program Comment may be amended when such an
amendment is agreed to in writing by the Navy and the ACHP. The
amendment will be effective on the date a copy of the amended
Program Comment signed by the Navy and the ACHP is filed with the
ACHP.
Appendix A
Definitions
a. Command Operation Report, formerly Command History Report
means a report that covers the operational and administrative
actions of the command for each calendar year and usually consists
of a chronology, a narrative, and enclosures. Some Command Operation
Reports are classified for a set period of time.
b. Decommission means to remove a vessel from active service.
c. Documentation package means a compilation of historically
significant records including, but not limited to, command operation
reports, war diaries, and deck logs.
d. Effect means alteration to the characteristics of a historic
property qualifying it for inclusion in or eligibility for the
National Register.
e. Historic Preservation Stakeholder means the ACHP, the NPS,
SHPOs, NCSHPO, the National Trust, any other agency or organization
specifically concerned with historic preservation issues, and the
public.
f. Naval Vessel Register means the official inventory of ships
and service craft titled to or in the custody of the U.S. Navy. It
includes information about vessels from the time of their
authorization through their life cycle and final disposition.
g. Ship deck log means a daily chronology of particular events
for administrative and legal purposes, as set forth by the Office of
the Chief of Naval Operations Instruction 3100.7 series.
h. Ship disposition review means an annual review of vessels in
active service conducted by the Chief of Naval Operations to
determine which vessels will be decommissioned from active service
and retained for potential reactivation or stricken from the Naval
Vessel Register and designated for disposal.
i. Stricken vessel means a decommissioned vessel that has been
removed from the Naval Vessel Register.
j. Undertaking means a project, activity, or program funded in
whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a
Federal agency, including those carried out by or on behalf of a
Federal agency; those carried out with Federal financial assistance;
and those requiring a Federal permit, license or approval.
k. Vessel means the ships and service craft built by and for the
Navy, used in furthering the Navy's military mission, and listed in
the Naval Vessel Register. Vessel does not include those vessels
retained in Navy custody for public display (i.e., USS CONSTITUTION,
NAUTILUS (SSN 571), ex-BARRY (DD 933)).
1. War diary means a ship's recounting of wartime operations.
Some war diaries are written in a cursory fashion. Others are works
of literary art. War diaries for combat actions are included with
the Command Operations Report.
[[Page 3750]]
Authority: 36 CFR 800.14(e).
Dated: January 14, 2010.
John M. Fowler,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-1023 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-K6-M