Intake Screening, 3182-3183 [2010-878]
Download as PDF
3182
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 12
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Prisons
28 CFR Part 522
[BOP–1110–P]
RIN 1120–AB47
Intake Screening
Bureau of Prisons, Justice.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In this document, the Bureau
of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to
streamline intake screening regulations
by removing internal agency
management procedures that need not
be stated in regulation.
DATES: Comments are due by March 22,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the
Rules Unit, Office of General Counsel,
Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20534. You may view
an electronic version of this rule at
https://www.regulations.gov. You may
also comment via the Internet to the
Bureau at boprules@bop.gov or by using
the https://www.regulations.gov
comment form for this regulation. When
submitting comments electronically you
must include the BOP Docket No. in the
subject box.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Qureshi, Office of General
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202)
307–2105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Posting of Public Comments
• Please note that all comments
received are considered part of the
public record and made available for
public inspection online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying
information (such as your name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter.
• If you want to submit personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) as part of your
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:05 Jan 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online, you must include the
phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also locate
all the personal identifying information
you do not want posted online in the
first paragraph of your comment and
identify what information you want
redacted.
• If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment but do not want it to be posted
online, you must include the phrase
‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also
prominently identify confidential
business information to be redacted
within the comment. If a comment has
so much confidential business
information that it cannot be effectively
redacted, all or part of that comment
may not be posted on https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Personal identifying information
identified and located as set forth above
will be placed in the agency’s public
docket file, but not posted online.
Confidential business information
identified and located as set forth above
will not be placed in the public docket
file. If you wish to inspect the agency’s
public docket file in person by
appointment, please see the ‘‘For
Additional Information’’ paragraph.
In this document, the Bureau of
Prisons (Bureau) proposes to streamline
intake screening regulations in 28 CFR
part 522, subpart C, by removing
internal agency management procedures
that need not be stated in regulation.
Although we are removing these
provisions from the CFR, they will
remain in Bureau policy statements on
intake screening. Bureau policy is a
more appropriate vehicle through which
to provide instruction and guidance to
staff.
The two regulations in 28 CFR
subpart C, §§ 522.20 and 522.21,
describe the Bureau’s intake screening
procedures. Section 522.20 is a
statement of purpose which we have not
substantively altered.
Section 522.21 explains that a newly
arrived inmate will be cleared by the
Medical Department and interviewed by
staff before assignment to the general
population. This section has not
substantively changed, but is simply
reworded. The current regulation states
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that, except for such camps and other
satellite facilities where segregating a
newly arrived inmate in detention is not
feasible, the Warden will ensure that a
newly arrived inmate is cleared by the
Medical Department and provided a
social interview by staff before
assignment to the general population.
The introductory paragraph in
§ 522.21 states that intake screening
interviews need not be done at ‘‘camps
and other satellite facilities where
segregating a newly arrived inmate in
detention is not feasible * * *’’ This
language is deleted from the proposed
regulation because intake interviews are
necessary at all facilities, including
camps and satellite facilities. If an issue
arises during intake screening of an
inmate at a facility without the means
to appropriately segregate an inmate,
that inmate will be moved to a more
appropriate facility. The regulation is
therefore being revised to indicate that
all inmates must be screened, without
differentiation between those arriving at
camps, satellite facilities, or other types
of facilities.
Other provisions in § 522.21 are being
deleted because they are purely staff
guidance. The deleted provisions are (1)
an instruction to staff to evaluate both
the general physical appearance and
emotional condition of the inmate
during a social interview; and (2) an
instruction to staff to place recorded
results of the intake medical screening
and the social interview in the inmate’s
central file. Both of these concepts will
be retained in the relevant policy
document, which is the Director’s
mandatory instruction to staff. The
deleted provisions relate solely to
internal agency management and
practice, and do not impose obligations
or confer any benefits upon our
regulated entities (the inmates) or the
public.
Executive Order 12866
This rule falls within a category of
actions that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has determined not
to constitute ‘‘significant regulatory
actions’’ under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 and, accordingly, it was
not reviewed by OMB.
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on
E:\FR\FM\20JAP1.SGM
20JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, under
Executive Order 13132, we determine
that this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Subchapter B—Inmate Admission,
Classification, and Transfer
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3621,
3622, 3624, 4001, 4042, 4081, 4082 (Repealed
in part as to offenses committed on or after
November 1, 1987), 4161–4166 (Repealed in
part as to offenses committed on or after
November 1, 1987), 5006–5024 (Repealed
October 12, 1984, as to offenses committed
after that date), 5039; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510.
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons,
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation
and by approving it certifies that it will
not have a significant economic impact
upon a substantial number of small
entities for the following reasons: This
rule pertains to the correctional
management of offenders committed to
the custody of the Attorney General or
the Director of the Bureau of Prisons,
and its economic impact is limited to
the Bureau’s appropriated funds.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by § 804 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996. This rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 522
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Prisoners.
Dated: January 8, 2010.
Harley G. Lappin,
Director, Bureau of Prisons.
Under rulemaking authority vested in
the Attorney General in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and delegated to the Director, Bureau of
Prisons, we amend 28 CFR part 522 as
follows.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:05 Jan 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
PART 522—ADMISSION TO
INSTITUTION
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR
part 522 continues to read as follows:
2. Revise Subpart C to read as follows:
Subpart C—Intake Screening
Sec.
522.20
522.21
§ 522.20
Purpose and scope.
Procedures.
Purpose and scope.
The purpose of this subpart is to
explain that Bureau of Prisons staff
screen newly arrived inmates to ensure
that Bureau health, safety, and security
standards are met.
§ 522.21
Procedures.
(a) Upon an inmate’s arrival, the
inmate will be interviewed to determine
if there are non-medical reasons for
housing the inmate away from the
general population.
(b) Within 24 hours after an inmate’s
arrival, the inmate will be medically
screened to determine if there are
medical reasons, including mental
health reasons, for housing the inmate
away from the general population or for
restricting temporary work assignments.
[FR Doc. 2010–878 Filed 1–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–05–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–1186; FRL–9104–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plan:
Kentucky; Approval Section 110(a)(1)
Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour
Ozone Standard for the Owensboro
Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a revision to the Kentucky State
Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning
the maintenance plan addressing the
1997 8-hour ozone standard for the
Owensboro 8-hour ozone attainment
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3183
area, which comprises Daviess County
and a portion of Hancock County
(hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Owensboro
Area’’). This maintenance plan was
submitted to EPA on May 27, 2008, by
the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and
ensures the continued attainment of the
1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS) through the
year 2020. On July 15, 2009, the
Commonwealth of Kentucky submitted
supplemental information with updated
emissions tables to reflect actual
emissions for this Area. EPA proposes to
find that this plan meets the statutory
and regulatory requirements, and is
consistent with EPA’s guidance. EPA is
proposing to approve the revisions to
the Kentucky SIP, pursuant to Section
110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). On
March 12, 2008, EPA issued a revised
ozone standard. The current action,
however, is being taken to address
requirements under the 1997 ozone
standard. Requirements for the
Owensboro Area under the 2008
standard will be addressed in the future.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2007–1186, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
3. Fax: 404–562–9019.
4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2007–1186,
Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae
Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2007–
1186. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
E:\FR\FM\20JAP1.SGM
20JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 20, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3182-3183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-878]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2010 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 3182]]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Prisons
28 CFR Part 522
[BOP-1110-P]
RIN 1120-AB47
Intake Screening
AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to
streamline intake screening regulations by removing internal agency
management procedures that need not be stated in regulation.
DATES: Comments are due by March 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the Rules Unit, Office of General
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW., Washington, DC
20534. You may view an electronic version of this rule at https://www.regulations.gov. You may also comment via the Internet to the
Bureau at boprules@bop.gov or by using the https://www.regulations.gov
comment form for this regulation. When submitting comments
electronically you must include the BOP Docket No. in the subject box.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Qureshi, Office of General
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 307-2105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments received are considered part
of the public record and made available for public inspection online at
https://www.regulations.gov. Such information includes personal
identifying information (such as your name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter.
If you want to submit personal identifying information
(such as your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not
want it to be posted online, you must include the phrase ``PERSONAL
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You
must also locate all the personal identifying information you do not
want posted online in the first paragraph of your comment and identify
what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential business information as
part of your comment but do not want it to be posted online, you must
include the phrase ``CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION'' in the first
paragraph of your comment. You must also prominently identify
confidential business information to be redacted within the comment. If
a comment has so much confidential business information that it cannot
be effectively redacted, all or part of that comment may not be posted
on https://www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information identified and located as
set forth above will be placed in the agency's public docket file, but
not posted online. Confidential business information identified and
located as set forth above will not be placed in the public docket
file. If you wish to inspect the agency's public docket file in person
by appointment, please see the ``For Additional Information''
paragraph.
In this document, the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to
streamline intake screening regulations in 28 CFR part 522, subpart C,
by removing internal agency management procedures that need not be
stated in regulation. Although we are removing these provisions from
the CFR, they will remain in Bureau policy statements on intake
screening. Bureau policy is a more appropriate vehicle through which to
provide instruction and guidance to staff.
The two regulations in 28 CFR subpart C, Sec. Sec. 522.20 and
522.21, describe the Bureau's intake screening procedures. Section
522.20 is a statement of purpose which we have not substantively
altered.
Section 522.21 explains that a newly arrived inmate will be cleared
by the Medical Department and interviewed by staff before assignment to
the general population. This section has not substantively changed, but
is simply reworded. The current regulation states that, except for such
camps and other satellite facilities where segregating a newly arrived
inmate in detention is not feasible, the Warden will ensure that a
newly arrived inmate is cleared by the Medical Department and provided
a social interview by staff before assignment to the general
population.
The introductory paragraph in Sec. 522.21 states that intake
screening interviews need not be done at ``camps and other satellite
facilities where segregating a newly arrived inmate in detention is not
feasible * * *'' This language is deleted from the proposed regulation
because intake interviews are necessary at all facilities, including
camps and satellite facilities. If an issue arises during intake
screening of an inmate at a facility without the means to appropriately
segregate an inmate, that inmate will be moved to a more appropriate
facility. The regulation is therefore being revised to indicate that
all inmates must be screened, without differentiation between those
arriving at camps, satellite facilities, or other types of facilities.
Other provisions in Sec. 522.21 are being deleted because they are
purely staff guidance. The deleted provisions are (1) an instruction to
staff to evaluate both the general physical appearance and emotional
condition of the inmate during a social interview; and (2) an
instruction to staff to place recorded results of the intake medical
screening and the social interview in the inmate's central file. Both
of these concepts will be retained in the relevant policy document,
which is the Director's mandatory instruction to staff. The deleted
provisions relate solely to internal agency management and practice,
and do not impose obligations or confer any benefits upon our regulated
entities (the inmates) or the public.
Executive Order 12866
This rule falls within a category of actions that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has determined not to constitute
``significant regulatory actions'' under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 and, accordingly, it was not reviewed by OMB.
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on
[[Page 3183]]
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. Therefore, under Executive Order 13132, we determine that
this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons, under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation and by
approving it certifies that it will not have a significant economic
impact upon a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons: This rule pertains to the correctional management of offenders
committed to the custody of the Attorney General or the Director of the
Bureau of Prisons, and its economic impact is limited to the Bureau's
appropriated funds.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by Sec. 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will
not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more;
a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-
based companies in domestic and export markets.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 522
Prisoners.
Dated: January 8, 2010.
Harley G. Lappin,
Director, Bureau of Prisons.
Under rulemaking authority vested in the Attorney General in 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and delegated to the Director, Bureau of Prisons, we
amend 28 CFR part 522 as follows.
Subchapter B--Inmate Admission, Classification, and Transfer
PART 522--ADMISSION TO INSTITUTION
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR part 522 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3621, 3622, 3624, 4001,
4042, 4081, 4082 (Repealed in part as to offenses committed on or
after November 1, 1987), 4161-4166 (Repealed in part as to offenses
committed on or after November 1, 1987), 5006-5024 (Repealed October
12, 1984, as to offenses committed after that date), 5039; 28 U.S.C.
509, 510.
2. Revise Subpart C to read as follows:
Subpart C--Intake Screening
Sec.
522.20 Purpose and scope.
522.21 Procedures.
Sec. 522.20 Purpose and scope.
The purpose of this subpart is to explain that Bureau of Prisons
staff screen newly arrived inmates to ensure that Bureau health,
safety, and security standards are met.
Sec. 522.21 Procedures.
(a) Upon an inmate's arrival, the inmate will be interviewed to
determine if there are non-medical reasons for housing the inmate away
from the general population.
(b) Within 24 hours after an inmate's arrival, the inmate will be
medically screened to determine if there are medical reasons, including
mental health reasons, for housing the inmate away from the general
population or for restricting temporary work assignments.
[FR Doc. 2010-878 Filed 1-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-05-P