Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-International Electronics Manufacturing Initiative, 2889-2890 [2010-641]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 19, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
(1) Type of information collection:
Reinstatement, with change, of a
previously approved collection for
which OMB approval has expired, State
Court Processing Statistics, 2009.
(2) The title of the form/collection:
State Court Processing Statistics, 2009.
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The form labels are SCPS—2009,
SATCS—2009, Bureau of Justice
Statistics, Office of Justice Programs,
U.S. Department of Justice.
(4) Affected Public Who Will be Asked
or Required to Respond, as well as a
Brief Abstract: State Trial Courts and
Pretrial Agencies. Abstract: The State
Court Processing Statistics (SCPS)
project covers felony case processing in
a sample of the nation’s 75 most
populous counties on a recurring basis.
In the SCPS data collection program,
felony defendants are tracked for up to
1 year with data collected on a variety
of felony case processing characteristics.
These include the types of arrest charges
filed against felony defendants,
conditions of pretrial release, and
pretrial misconduct which includes the
court appearance record, violations of
release conditions, and re-arrests
committed while on pretrial release.
The adjudication outcomes
encompassing the dismissal, diversion,
guilty plea, and trial conviction rates for
felony defendants are also recorded. For
those defendants convicted, sentencing
data are collected. The SCPS 2009
project also involves collecting
aggregate information on the electronic
data storage and transfer capacities of
courts located in a sample of the
nation’s 900 most populous counties.
(5) An Estimate of the Total Number
of Respondents and the Amount of Time
Estimated for an Average Respondent to
Respond: It is estimated that
information will be collected on a total
of 15,000 felony defendants from 40
responding counties. The estimated
burden hours will be contingent upon
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:28 Jan 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
the counties electronic storage and
transfer capabilities. Data collection will
occur in a more timely and expeditious
manner among counties with the
capacities to electronically transfer all
their case processing, pretrial, and
criminal history information to the data
collection agent. It is estimated that
about 10 of the 40 counties have the
capacity to transfer entire files of SCPS
cases and that it should take these
counties about 15 hours per county to
produce programs capable of
transferring the SCPS data to the data
collection agent. For the remaining 30
counties that lack the capacity to engage
in electronic transfers, data collection
will involve manually coding the SCPS
survey forms for an online or paper
based submission. Prior SCPS data
collection endeavors show an estimated
one hour to manually code each SCPS
case for online or paper based
submission. In addition to collecting
case processing information, courts
located in 200 jurisdictions will be
asked to complete a spreadsheet
surveying their overall levels of case
and pretrial automation. Pretests of the
instrument found that the average time
to complete the spreadsheet was about
2 hours per trial court.
(6) An Estimate of the Total Public
Burden (in hours) Associated with the
Collection: The estimated public burden
associated for the SCPS data collection
is 11,800 hours. In the 30 counties in
which SCPS cases are manually coded
for paper or online based submission, an
estimated 11,250 data collection forms
(375 forms per county) will be coded
and it should take an estimated one
hour to code each data collection form.
Hence, the estimated public burden
associated with the manual based
collection of SCPS data forms should be
about 11,250 hours. In the 10 counties
in which SCPS cases can be transferred
through computerized case management
systems, it should take an estimated 150
hours (15 hours per county) to generate
the programs capable of transferring
information for these SCPS cases.
Lastly, about 400 hours will be required
to complete the spreadsheets surveying
the overall levels of case and pretrial
automation for courts located in 200
counties (200 counties multiplied by 2
hours per spreadsheet). Therefore, the
total burden time for the SCPS 2009
project should be about 11,800 hours
(11,250 hours for manual based data
collection + 150 hours for computerized
transfer of automated SCPS data + 400
hours for the survey of court automation
capacities).
If additional information is required
contact: Ms. Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2889
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Suite 1600, 601 D Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: January 12, 2010.
Ms. Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2010–768 Filed 1–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—International Electronics
Manufacturing Initiative
Notice is hereby given that, on
December 15, 2009, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
International Electronics Manufacturing
Initiative (‘‘iNEMI’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Elec & Eltek, Kowloon,
HONG KONG–CHINA; Guangdong
Shengyi Sci. Tech Co., Guangdong,
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA;
Ibiden, Toshiba-cho, JAPAN; Pacific
Insulating Material Co., Ltd., Shenzhen,
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA;
Lenovo, Quarry Bay, HONG KONG–
CHINA; and Quanta Computer Inc., Tao
Yuan Shien, TAIWAN, have been added
as parties to this venture.
Also, Agile Software Corporation, San
Jose, CA; NanoDyamics, Inc., Buffalo,
NY; Ciba, Tarrytown, NY; 3M, St. Paul,
`
MN; Ministere du Developpement
economique, de l’Innovation et de
l’Exportation (Gourvernement du
Quebec) Montreal, Quebec, CANADA;
Motorola, Inc., Schaumburg, IL; Jabil
Circuit, St. Petersburg, FL; and ERSA
North America, Plymouth, WI have
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and iNEMI
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On June 6, 1996, iNEMI filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
2890
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 19, 2010 / Notices
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on June 28, 1996 (61 FR 33774).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on November 4, 2008. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on December 12, 2008 (73 FR
75772).
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–641 Filed 1–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Notice is hereby given that, on
December 28, 2009, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the
Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers (‘‘IEEE’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing additions or
changes to its standards development
activities. The notifications were filed
for the purpose of extending the Act’s
provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, 22 new standards have
been initiated and seven existing
standards are being revised. More detail
regarding these changes can be found at
https://standards.ieee.org/standardswire/
sba/09–11–09.html.
On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on July 6, 2009. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on August 3, 2009 (74 FR 38473).
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Antitrust Division
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—DVD Copy Control
Association
Notice is hereby given that, on
December 3, 2009, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), DVD
Copy Control Association (‘‘DVD CCA’’)
has filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Quatius Limited, Kowloon,
HONG KONG-CHINA has been added as
a party to this venture. Also, Futarque
A/S, Aalborg, DENMARK; Hyo Seong
Techno Corporation, Seoul, REPUBLIC
OF KOREA; OPT Corporation, Naganoken, JAPAN; and Shinano Kenshi Co.,
Ltd., Nagano-ken, JAPAN have
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and DVD CCA
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727)
The last notification was filed with
the Department on September 4, 2009.
A notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on October 27, 2009 (74 FR 55258)
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–640 Filed 1–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–639 Filed 1–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:28 Jan 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0004]
OSHA Listens: Occupational Safety
and Health Administration Stakeholder
Meeting
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) is
announcing a public meeting to solicit
comments and suggestions from
stakeholders on key issues facing the
agency.
DATES: The public meeting will be held
on February 10, 2010, from 9 a.m. to 5
p.m. Persons interested in attending the
meeting must register by February 3,
2010. In addition, comments relating to
the ‘‘Scope of Meeting’’ section of this
document must be submitted in written
or electronic form by March 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at the Frances Perkins Building
Auditorium, U.S. Department of Labor,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Submit written comments to the
OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA–2010–0004, Technical Data
Center, Room N–2625, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone
(202) 693–2350. Submit electronic
comments by e-mail to: stakeholder.
meeting@dol.gov. All comments should
be identified with Docket No. OSHA–
2010–0004.
Registration To Attend and/or To
Participate in the Meeting: If you wish
to attend the public meeting and/or
make an oral presentation at the
meeting, you must register by e-mail to:
stakeholder.meeting@dol.gov by close of
business on February 3, 2010. When
registering, you must provide the
following information: (1) Your name,
title, company or organization (if
applicable), address, phone number and
e-mail address, and (2) if you wish to
make a short presentation, the specific
topic or issue to be addressed. Actual
times provided for presentation will
depend on the number of requests.
There is no fee to register for the public
meeting. Registration on the day of the
public meeting will be permitted on a
space-available basis beginning at 8:30
a.m.
We will do our best to accommodate
all persons who wish to make a
presentation at the meeting. OSHA
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2889-2890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-641]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--International Electronics Manufacturing
Initiative
Notice is hereby given that, on December 15, 2009, pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), International Electronics
Manufacturing Initiative (``iNEMI'') has filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified
circumstances. Specifically, Elec & Eltek, Kowloon, HONG KONG-CHINA;
Guangdong Shengyi Sci. Tech Co., Guangdong, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA;
Ibiden, Toshiba-cho, JAPAN; Pacific Insulating Material Co., Ltd.,
Shenzhen, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Lenovo, Quarry Bay, HONG KONG-
CHINA; and Quanta Computer Inc., Tao Yuan Shien, TAIWAN, have been
added as parties to this venture.
Also, Agile Software Corporation, San Jose, CA; NanoDyamics, Inc.,
Buffalo, NY; Ciba, Tarrytown, NY; 3M, St. Paul, MN; Minist[egrave]re du
Developpement economique, de l'Innovation et de l'Exportation
(Gourvernement du Quebec) Montreal, Quebec, CANADA; Motorola, Inc.,
Schaumburg, IL; Jabil Circuit, St. Petersburg, FL; and ERSA North
America, Plymouth, WI have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group
research project remains open, and iNEMI intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
On June 6, 1996, iNEMI filed its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of
[[Page 2890]]
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on June 28, 1996 (61 FR 33774).
The last notification was filed with the Department on November 4,
2008. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 12, 2008 (73 FR 75772).
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-641 Filed 1-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M