Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska-2011-12 and 2012-13 Subsistence Taking of Fish and Shellfish Regulations, 2448-2451 [2010-688]
Download as PDF
2448
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2010 / Proposed Rules
DHS is currently considering,
however, and seeks comments on,
whether it is feasible to refine existing
models or develop a new model for
uncontained pool fires (i.e., where the
contents of one or more gasoline storage
tanks escape from secondary
containment),14 so that such a model
could be used for future consequence
assessments for gasoline terminals—in
lieu of or in addition to the modified
VCE model.
Dated: January 12, 2010.
Rand Beers,
Under Secretary for National Protection and
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010–738 Filed 1–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
IV. Issues for Commenters
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Comments that will provide the most
assistance to DHS should address the
following issues and questions.
Commenters should include
explanations and relevant supporting
materials with their comments
whenever possible.
a. Comments on the inclusion of 6
CFR 27.203(b)(1)(v) (counting of
Release-COI in gasoline, diesel,
kerosene, or jet fuel in aboveground
storage tanks) and 6 CFR 27.204(a)(2)
(the flammable mixtures rule), as they
apply to gasoline terminals.
b. Comments on the applicability of
the modified VCE model to gasoline
terminals, including: Whether the
reduction of the vapor yield for gasoline
from ten percent (as in EPA’s VCE
model) to one percent reasonably
reflects the potential consequences for a
vapor cloud explosion from gasoline (as
compared to other liquid flammable
chemicals); and whether a different
yield factor adjustment might better
reflect the potential consequences for a
vapor cloud explosion from gasoline.
c. Comments on whether a reasonable
model exists or should be developed for
future use that would allow DHS to
estimate the plausible worst-case
consequences of an uncontained pool
fire resulting from a successful attack on
gasoline terminals.
of secondary containment may be taken into
account, however, during the Department’s
determination as to whether a covered facility’s Site
Security Plan satisfies the CFATS risk-based
performance standards.
14 Models currently available for calculating the
consequences of an uncontained pool fire include
assumptions that may be appropriate for releases
from certain small sources (e.g., a gasoline tank
truck) but that are not realistic or appropriate for
worst-case modeling of large-scale releases (e.g., a
sudden release from an aboveground gasoline
storage tank). For example, the current EPA RMP
model assumes that the surface upon which the
gasoline has been released is perfectly flat and nonpermeable. See EPA’s ‘‘RMP Guidance for Offsite
Consequence Analysis’’ (April 1999) at https://
www.epa.gov/OEM/docs/chem/oca-all.pdf.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:19 Jan 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. FWS–R7–SM–2009–0061;
70101–1261–0000L6]
RIN 1018–AW71
Subsistence Management Regulations
for Public Lands in Alaska—2011–12
and 2012–13 Subsistence Taking of
Fish and Shellfish Regulations
AGENCIES: Forest Service, Agriculture;
Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
establish regulations for fishing seasons,
harvest limits, methods and means
related to taking of fish and shellfish for
subsistence uses during the 2011–2012
and 2012–2013 regulatory years. The
Federal Subsistence Board is presently
on a schedule of completing the process
of revising subsistence taking of fish and
shellfish regulations in odd-numbered
years and subsistence taking of wildlife
regulations in even-numbered years;
public proposal and review processes
take place during the preceding year.
The Board also addresses customary and
traditional use determinations during
the applicable cycle. When final, the
resulting rulemaking will replace the
existing subsistence fish taking
regulations, which expire on March 31,
2011. Future rules will not have
expiration dates but will be revised
according to the applicable cycle. This
rule would also amend the customary
and traditional use determinations of
the Federal Subsistence Board and the
general regulations on subsistence
taking of fish and wildlife.
DATES: Public meetings: The Federal
Subsistence Regional Advisory Councils
will hold public meetings to receive
comments and make proposals to
change this proposed rule on several
dates between February 15 and March
26, 2010, and then hold another round
of public meetings to discuss and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
receive comments on the proposals, and
make recommendations on the
proposals to the Federal Subsistence
Board, on several dates between August
24 and October 15, 2010. The Board will
discuss and evaluate proposed
regulatory changes during a public
meeting in Anchorage, AK, on January
18, 2011. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for specific information on
dates and locations of the public
meetings.
Public comments: Comments and
proposals to change this proposed rule
must be received or postmarked by
March 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Public meetings: The
Federal Subsistence Board and the
Regional Advisory Councils’ public
meetings will be held at various
locations in Alaska. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for specific information on
dates and locations of the public
meetings.
Public comments: You may submit
comments by one of the following
methods:
• Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov and search for
FWS–R7–SM–2009–0061, which is the
docket number for this rulemaking.
• By hard copy: U.S. mail or handdelivery to: USFWS, Office of
Subsistence Management, 1011 East
Tudor Road, MS 121, Attn: Theo
Matuskowitz, Anchorage, AK 99503–
6199, or hand delivery to the Designated
Federal Official attending any of the
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Council public meetings. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
additional information on locations of
the public meetings.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Review Process section below for
more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chair, Federal Subsistence Board, c/o
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Attention: Peter J. Probasco, Office of
Subsistence Management; (907) 786–
3888 or subsistence@fws.gov. For
questions specific to National Forest
System lands, contact Calvin H. Casipit,
Acting Regional Subsistence Program
Leader, USDA, Forest Service, Alaska
Region; (907) 586–7918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under Title VIII of the Alaska
National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111–3126),
the Secretary of the Interior and the
E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM
15JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries)
jointly implement the Federal
Subsistence Management Program. This
program provides a preference for
subsistence uses of fish and wildlife
resources on Federal public lands and
waters in Alaska. The Secretaries first
published regulations to carry out this
program in the Federal Register on May
29, 1992 (57 FR 22940). The Program
has subsequently amended these
regulations a number of times. Because
this program is a joint effort between
Interior and Agriculture, these
regulations are located in two titles of
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR):
Title 36, ‘‘Parks, Forests, and Public
Property,’’ and Title 50, ‘‘Wildlife and
Fisheries,’’ at 36 CFR 242.1–28 and 50
CFR 100.1–28, respectively. The
regulations contain subparts as follows:
Subpart A, General Provisions; Subpart
B, Program Structure; Subpart C, Board
Determinations; and Subpart D,
Subsistence Taking of Fish and Wildlife.
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
1—Southeast Regional Council ................................................................
2—Southcentral Regional Council ...........................................................
3—Kodiak/Aleutians Regional Council ...................................................
4—Bristol Bay Regional Council .............................................................
5—Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Regional Council ......................................
6—Western Interior Regional Council .....................................................
7—Seward Peninsula Regional Council ..................................................
8—Northwest Arctic Regional Council ...................................................
9—Eastern Interior Regional Council ......................................................
10—North Slope Regional Council ..........................................................
During April 2010, the written
proposals to change the subpart D, take
of fish and shellfish, regulations and
subpart C, customary and traditional
use, determinations will be compiled
and distributed for public review.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Consistent with subpart B of these
regulations, the Secretaries established a
Federal Subsistence Board to administer
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program. The Board is made up of:
• A Chair appointed by the Secretary
of the Interior with concurrence of the
Secretary of Agriculture;
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service;
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
National Park Service;
• The Alaska State Director, U.S.
Bureau of Land Management;
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
Bureau of Indian Affairs; and
• The Alaska Regional Forester, U.S.
Forest Service.
Through the Board, these agencies
participate in the development of
regulations for subparts A, B, and C,
which set forth the basic program, and
the subpart D regulations, which, among
other things, set forth specific harvest
seasons and limits.
1—Southeast Regional Council ................................................................
2—Southcentral Regional Council ...........................................................
3—Kodiak/Aleutians Regional Council ...................................................
4—Bristol Bay Regional Council .............................................................
5—Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Regional Council ......................................
6—Western Interior Regional Council .....................................................
7—Seward Peninsula Regional Council ..................................................
8—Northwest Arctic Regional Council ...................................................
9—Eastern Interior Regional Council ......................................................
10—North Slope Regional Council ..........................................................
A notice will be published of specific
dates, times, and meeting locations in
local and statewide newspapers prior to
both series of meetings. Locations and
dates may change based on weather or
local circumstances. The amount of
work on each Regional Council’s agenda
determines the length of each Regional
Council meeting.
The Board will discuss and evaluate
proposed changes to the subsistence
management regulations during a public
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:19 Jan 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Public Review Process—Comments,
Proposals, and Public Meetings
The Regional Councils have a
substantial role in reviewing this
proposed rule and making
recommendations for the final rule. The
Federal Subsistence Board, through the
Regional Councils, will hold meetings
on this proposed rule at the following
locations in Alaska, on the following
dates:
March 16, 2010.
March 10, 2010.
March 23, 2010.
March 3, 2010.
March 2, 2010.
February 23, 2010.
March 9, 2010.
February 19, 2010.
February 23, 2010.
February 16, 2010.
meetings in August through October
2010, to receive comments on specific
proposals and to develop
recommendations to the Board at the
following locations in Alaska, on the
following dates:
Sitka ...................................................
Cordova ..............................................
TBA ....................................................
Naknek ...............................................
Quinhagak ..........................................
McGrath ..............................................
Nome ..................................................
Kotzebue .............................................
Central ................................................
Barrow ................................................
meeting scheduled to be held in
Anchorage, AK, on January 18, 2011.
The Council Chairs, or their designated
representatives, will present their
respective Councils’ recommendations
at the Board meeting. Additional oral
testimony may be provided on specific
proposals before the Board at that time.
At that public meeting, the Board will
deliberate and take final action on
proposals received that request changes
to this proposed rule.
PO 00000
In administering the program, the
Secretaries divided Alaska into 10
subsistence resource regions, each of
which is represented by a Regional
Council. The Regional Councils provide
a forum for rural residents with personal
knowledge of local conditions and
resource requirements to have a
meaningful role in the subsistence
management of fish and wildlife on
Federal public lands in Alaska. The
Regional Council members represent
varied geographical, cultural, and user
diversity within each region.
Ketchikan ...........................................
Anchorage ..........................................
TBD ....................................................
Togiak .................................................
Bethel .................................................
Fairbanks ............................................
Nome ..................................................
Kotzebue .............................................
Fairbanks ............................................
Barrow ................................................
During the 30-day public comment
period, which is presently scheduled to
end on May 14, 2010, written public
comments will be accepted on the
distributed proposals.
The Board, through the Regional
Councils, will hold a second series of
2449
September 28, 2010.
October 13, 2010.
September 21, 2010.
September 22, 2010.
September 30, 2010.
October 5, 2010.
October 13, 2010.
September 1, 2010.
October 13, 2010.
August 24, 2010.
Proposals to the Board to modify
fisheries harvest regulations and
customary and traditional use
determinations must include the
following information:
a. Name, address, and telephone
number of the requestor;
b. Each section and/or paragraph
designation in this proposed rule for
which changes are suggested;
c. A statement explaining why each
change is necessary;
d. Proposed wording changes; and
E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM
15JAP1
2450
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2010 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
e. Any additional information that
you believe will help the Board in
evaluating the proposed change.
The Board rejects proposals that fail
to include the above information, or
proposals that are beyond the scope of
authorities in § ll.24, subpart C (the
regulations governing customary and
traditional use determinations), and
§§ ll.27, and ll.28, subpart D (the
specific regulations governing the
subsistence take of fish and shellfish).
During the January 18, 2011 meeting,
the Board may defer review and action
on some proposals to allow time for
local cooperative planning efforts, or to
acquire additional needed information.
The Board may elect to defer taking
action on any given proposal if the
workload of staff, Regional Councils, or
the Board becomes excessive. These
deferrals may be based on
recommendations by the affected
Regional Council(s) or staff members, or
on the basis of the Board’s intention to
do least harm to the subsistence user
and the resource involved. The Board
may consider and act on alternatives
that address the intent of a proposal
while differing in approach.
Tribal Consultation and Comment
As expressed in Executive Order
13175, ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,’’ the
Federal officials that have been
delegated authority by the Secretaries
are committed to honoring the unique
government-to-government political
relationship that exists between the
Federal Government and Federally
Recognized Indian Tribes (Tribes) as
listed in 73 FR 18553 (April 4, 2008).
The Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act does not specifically
provide rights to Tribes for the
subsistence taking of wildlife, fish, and
shellfish. However, because Tribal
members are affected by subsistence
fishing, hunting, and trapping
regulations, the Secretaries have elected
to provide Tribes an opportunity to
consult on this rule.
The Secretaries will engage in
outreach efforts for this rule, including
a notification letter, to ensure that
Tribes are advised of the mechanisms by
which they can participate. The Board
provides a variety of opportunities for
consultation: Proposing changes to the
existing rule; commenting on proposed
changes to the existing rule; engaging in
dialogue at the Regional Advisory
Council meetings; engaging in dialogue
at the Board’s meetings; and providing
input in person, by mail, e-mail, or
phone at any time during the
rulemaking process. The Secretaries will
commit to efficiently and adequately
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:19 Jan 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
reviewing the government-togovernment consultation process with
regard to subsistence rulemaking.
The Board will consider Tribes’
information, input, and
recommendations, and address their
concerns as much as practicable.
However, in keeping with ANILCA
§ 805(c), the Board will follow
recommendations of the Regional
Advisory Councils for the taking of fish
and wildlife unless their
recommendation is determined to be not
supported by substantial evidence,
violates recognized principles of fish
and wildlife conservation, or would be
detrimental to the satisfaction of
subsistence needs. The Board will
inform the Tribes how their
recommendations were considered.
Developing the 2011–13 Fish and
Shellfish Seasons and Harvest Limit
Regulations
Subpart D regulations are subject to
periodic review and revision. The
Federal Subsistence Board currently
completes the process of revising
subsistence take of fish and shellfish
regulations in odd-numbered years and
subsistence take of wildlife regulations
in even-numbered years; public
proposal and review processes take
place during the preceding year. The
Board also addresses customary and
traditional use determinations during
the applicable cycle.
The text of the final rule published
March 30, 2009 (74 FR 14049) for the
2009–11 subparts C and D regulations is
the text of this proposed rule. The
regulations established in that final rule
are set to expire March 31, 2011.
However, those regulations will remain
in effect on April 1, 2011, unless
subsequent Board action changes
elements as a result of the public review
process outlined above in this
document.
Compliance With Statutory and
Regulatory Authorities
National Environmental Policy Act
A Draft Environmental Impact
Statement that described four
alternatives for developing a Federal
Subsistence Management Program was
distributed for public comment on
October 7, 1991. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
was published on February 28, 1992.
The Record of Decision (ROD) on
Subsistence Management for Federal
Public Lands in Alaska was signed April
6, 1992. The selected alternative in the
FEIS (Alternative IV) defined the
administrative framework of an annual
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regulatory cycle for subsistence
regulations.
A 1997 environmental assessment
dealt with the expansion of Federal
jurisdiction over fisheries and is
available at the office listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The
Secretary of the Interior, with
concurrence of the Secretary of
Agriculture, determined that expansion
of Federal jurisdiction does not
constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the human
environment and, therefore, signed a
Finding of No Significant Impact.
Section 810 of ANILCA
An ANILCA Section 810 analysis was
completed as part of the FEIS process on
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program. The intent of all Federal
subsistence regulations is to accord
subsistence uses of fish and wildlife on
public lands a priority over the taking
of fish and wildlife on such lands for
other purposes, unless restriction is
necessary to conserve healthy fish and
wildlife populations. The final section
810 analysis determination appeared in
the April 6, 1992, ROD and concluded
that the Federal Subsistence
Management Program, under
Alternative IV with an annual process
for setting subsistence regulations, may
have some local impacts on subsistence
uses, but will not likely restrict
subsistence uses significantly.
During the subsequent environmental
assessment process for extending
fisheries jurisdiction, an evaluation of
the effects of this rule was conducted in
accordance with section 810. That
evaluation also supported the
Secretaries’ determination that the rule
will not reach the ‘‘may significantly
restrict’’ threshold that would require
notice and hearings under ANILCA
section 810(a).
Paperwork Reduction Act
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. This proposed
rule does not contain any new
collections of information that require
OMB approval. OMB has reviewed and
approved the following collections of
information associated with the
subsistence regulations at 36 CFR 242
and 50 CFR 100:
(1) Subsistence hunting and fishing
applications, permits, and reports (OMB
Control No. 1018–0075 expires
December 31, 2009).
(2) Federal Subsistence Regional
Advisory Council Membership
E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM
15JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Application/Nomination and Interview
Forms (OMB Control No. 1018–0120,
expires March 31, 2012).
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule is
not significant and has not reviewed
this rule under Executive Order 12866.
OMB bases its determination upon the
following four criteria:
(a) Whether the rule will have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy or adversely affect an
economic sector, productivity, jobs, the
environment, or other units of the
government.
(b) Whether the rule will create
inconsistencies with other agencies’
actions.
(c) Whether the rule will materially
affect entitlements, grants, user fees,
loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of their recipients.
(d) Whether the rule raises novel legal
or policy issues.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of flexibility analyses for
rules that will have a significant effect
on a substantial number of small
entities, which include small
businesses, organizations, or
governmental jurisdictions. In general,
the resources to be harvested under this
rule are already being harvested and
consumed by the local harvester and do
not result in an additional dollar benefit
to the economy. However, we estimate
that 2 million pounds of meat are
harvested by subsistence users annually
and, if given an estimated dollar value
of $3.00 per pound, this amount would
equate to about $6 million in food value
statewide. Based upon the amounts and
values cited above, the Departments
certify that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.), this rule is not a major rule. It
does not have an effect on the economy
of $100 million or more, will not cause
a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, and does not have
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:19 Jan 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Executive Order 12630
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the
Secretaries to administer a subsistence
priority on public lands. The scope of
this program is limited by definition to
certain public lands. Likewise, these
regulations have no potential takings of
private property implications as defined
by Executive Order 12630.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Secretaries have determined and
certify pursuant to the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et
seq., that this rulemaking will not
impose a cost of $100 million or more
in any given year on local or State
governments or private entities. The
implementation of this rule is by
Federal agencies and there is no cost
imposed on any State or local entities or
Tribal governments.
Executive Order 12988
The Secretaries have determined that
these regulations meet the applicable
standards provided in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988,
regarding civil justice reform.
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the rule does not have sufficient
Federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Title VIII of ANILCA precludes the State
from exercising subsistence
management authority over fish and
wildlife resources on Federal lands
unless it meets certain requirements.
Executive Order 13175
The Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act does not specifically
provide rights to Tribes for the
subsistence taking of wildlife, fish, and
shellfish. However, the Secretaries have
elected to provide Tribes an opportunity
to consult on this rule. The Board will
provide a variety of opportunities for
consultation through: proposing
changes to the existing rule;
commenting on proposed changes to the
existing rule; engaging in dialogue at the
Regional Advisory Council meetings;
engaging in dialogue at the Board’s
meetings; and providing input in
person, by mail, e-mail, or phone at any
time during the rulemaking process.
Executive Order 13211
This Executive Order requires
agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain
actions. However, this rule is not a
significant regulatory action under E.O.
13211, affecting energy supply,
distribution, or use, and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
2451
Drafting Information
Theo Matuskowitz drafted these
regulations under the guidance of Peter
J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence
Management, Alaska Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Anchorage, Alaska. Additional
assistance was provided by:
• Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office,
Bureau of Land Management;
• Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy
Swanton, Alaska Regional Office,
National Park Service;
• Drs. Warren Eastland and Glenn
Chen, Alaska Regional Office, Bureau of
Indian Affairs;
• Jerry Berg and Carl Jack, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; and
• Calvin H. Casipit, Alaska Regional
Office, U.S. Forest Service.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Federal Subsistence
Board proposes to amend 36 CFR 242
and 50 CFR 100 for the 2011–12 and
2012–13 regulatory years. The text of
the proposed amendments to 36 CFR
242.24, 242.27, and 242.28 and 50 CFR
100.24, 100.27, and 100.28 is the final
rule for the 2009–11 regulatory period
(74 FR 14049; March 30, 2009), as
modified by any subsequent Federal
Subsistence Board action.
Dated: November 20, 2009.
Peter J. Probasco,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
Dated: November 23, 2009.
Calvin H. Casipit,
Acting Subsistence Program Leader, USDAForest Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–688 Filed 1–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P; 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\15JAP1.SGM
15JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2448-2451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-688]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. FWS-R7-SM-2009-0061; 70101-1261-0000L6]
RIN 1018-AW71
Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska--
2011-12 and 2012-13 Subsistence Taking of Fish and Shellfish
Regulations
AGENCIES: Forest Service, Agriculture; Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would establish regulations for fishing
seasons, harvest limits, methods and means related to taking of fish
and shellfish for subsistence uses during the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013
regulatory years. The Federal Subsistence Board is presently on a
schedule of completing the process of revising subsistence taking of
fish and shellfish regulations in odd-numbered years and subsistence
taking of wildlife regulations in even-numbered years; public proposal
and review processes take place during the preceding year. The Board
also addresses customary and traditional use determinations during the
applicable cycle. When final, the resulting rulemaking will replace the
existing subsistence fish taking regulations, which expire on March 31,
2011. Future rules will not have expiration dates but will be revised
according to the applicable cycle. This rule would also amend the
customary and traditional use determinations of the Federal Subsistence
Board and the general regulations on subsistence taking of fish and
wildlife.
DATES: Public meetings: The Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Councils will hold public meetings to receive comments and make
proposals to change this proposed rule on several dates between
February 15 and March 26, 2010, and then hold another round of public
meetings to discuss and receive comments on the proposals, and make
recommendations on the proposals to the Federal Subsistence Board, on
several dates between August 24 and October 15, 2010. The Board will
discuss and evaluate proposed regulatory changes during a public
meeting in Anchorage, AK, on January 18, 2011. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for specific information on dates and locations of the
public meetings.
Public comments: Comments and proposals to change this proposed
rule must be received or postmarked by March 24, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Public meetings: The Federal Subsistence Board and the
Regional Advisory Councils' public meetings will be held at various
locations in Alaska. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific
information on dates and locations of the public meetings.
Public comments: You may submit comments by one of the following
methods:
Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov and search for FWS-R7-SM-2009-0061, which is
the docket number for this rulemaking.
By hard copy: U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: USFWS, Office
of Subsistence Management, 1011 East Tudor Road, MS 121, Attn: Theo
Matuskowitz, Anchorage, AK 99503-6199, or hand delivery to the
Designated Federal Official attending any of the Federal Subsistence
Regional Advisory Council public meetings. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for additional information on locations of the public
meetings.
We will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any personal information you provide
us (see the Public Review Process section below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chair, Federal Subsistence Board, c/o
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Attention: Peter J. Probasco, Office of
Subsistence Management; (907) 786-3888 or subsistence@fws.gov. For
questions specific to National Forest System lands, contact Calvin H.
Casipit, Acting Regional Subsistence Program Leader, USDA, Forest
Service, Alaska Region; (907) 586-7918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111-3126), the Secretary of the Interior and
the
[[Page 2449]]
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries) jointly implement the Federal
Subsistence Management Program. This program provides a preference for
subsistence uses of fish and wildlife resources on Federal public lands
and waters in Alaska. The Secretaries first published regulations to
carry out this program in the Federal Register on May 29, 1992 (57 FR
22940). The Program has subsequently amended these regulations a number
of times. Because this program is a joint effort between Interior and
Agriculture, these regulations are located in two titles of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR): Title 36, ``Parks, Forests, and Public
Property,'' and Title 50, ``Wildlife and Fisheries,'' at 36 CFR 242.1-
28 and 50 CFR 100.1-28, respectively. The regulations contain subparts
as follows: Subpart A, General Provisions; Subpart B, Program
Structure; Subpart C, Board Determinations; and Subpart D, Subsistence
Taking of Fish and Wildlife.
Consistent with subpart B of these regulations, the Secretaries
established a Federal Subsistence Board to administer the Federal
Subsistence Management Program. The Board is made up of:
A Chair appointed by the Secretary of the Interior with
concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. National Park Service;
The Alaska State Director, U.S. Bureau of Land Management;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. Bureau of Indian
Affairs; and
The Alaska Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service.
Through the Board, these agencies participate in the development of
regulations for subparts A, B, and C, which set forth the basic
program, and the subpart D regulations, which, among other things, set
forth specific harvest seasons and limits.
In administering the program, the Secretaries divided Alaska into
10 subsistence resource regions, each of which is represented by a
Regional Council. The Regional Councils provide a forum for rural
residents with personal knowledge of local conditions and resource
requirements to have a meaningful role in the subsistence management of
fish and wildlife on Federal public lands in Alaska. The Regional
Council members represent varied geographical, cultural, and user
diversity within each region.
Public Review Process--Comments, Proposals, and Public Meetings
The Regional Councils have a substantial role in reviewing this
proposed rule and making recommendations for the final rule. The
Federal Subsistence Board, through the Regional Councils, will hold
meetings on this proposed rule at the following locations in Alaska, on
the following dates:
Region 1--Southeast Regional Council..... Ketchikan................... March 16, 2010.
Region 2--Southcentral Regional Council.. Anchorage................... March 10, 2010.
Region 3--Kodiak/Aleutians Regional TBD......................... March 23, 2010.
Council.
Region 4--Bristol Bay Regional Council... Togiak...................... March 3, 2010.
Region 5--Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Regional Bethel...................... March 2, 2010.
Council.
Region 6--Western Interior Regional Fairbanks................... February 23, 2010.
Council.
Region 7--Seward Peninsula Regional Nome........................ March 9, 2010.
Council.
Region 8--Northwest Arctic Regional Kotzebue.................... February 19, 2010.
Council.
Region 9--Eastern Interior Regional Fairbanks................... February 23, 2010.
Council.
Region 10--North Slope Regional Council.. Barrow...................... February 16, 2010.
During April 2010, the written proposals to change the subpart D,
take of fish and shellfish, regulations and subpart C, customary and
traditional use, determinations will be compiled and distributed for
public review. During the 30-day public comment period, which is
presently scheduled to end on May 14, 2010, written public comments
will be accepted on the distributed proposals.
The Board, through the Regional Councils, will hold a second series
of meetings in August through October 2010, to receive comments on
specific proposals and to develop recommendations to the Board at the
following locations in Alaska, on the following dates:
Region 1--Southeast Regional Council..... Sitka....................... September 28, 2010.
Region 2--Southcentral Regional Council.. Cordova..................... October 13, 2010.
Region 3--Kodiak/Aleutians Regional TBA......................... September 21, 2010.
Council.
Region 4--Bristol Bay Regional Council... Naknek...................... September 22, 2010.
Region 5--Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Regional Quinhagak................... September 30, 2010.
Council.
Region 6--Western Interior Regional McGrath..................... October 5, 2010.
Council.
Region 7--Seward Peninsula Regional Nome........................ October 13, 2010.
Council.
Region 8--Northwest Arctic Regional Kotzebue.................... September 1, 2010.
Council.
Region 9--Eastern Interior Regional Central..................... October 13, 2010.
Council.
Region 10--North Slope Regional Council.. Barrow...................... August 24, 2010.
A notice will be published of specific dates, times, and meeting
locations in local and statewide newspapers prior to both series of
meetings. Locations and dates may change based on weather or local
circumstances. The amount of work on each Regional Council's agenda
determines the length of each Regional Council meeting.
The Board will discuss and evaluate proposed changes to the
subsistence management regulations during a public meeting scheduled to
be held in Anchorage, AK, on January 18, 2011. The Council Chairs, or
their designated representatives, will present their respective
Councils' recommendations at the Board meeting. Additional oral
testimony may be provided on specific proposals before the Board at
that time. At that public meeting, the Board will deliberate and take
final action on proposals received that request changes to this
proposed rule.
Proposals to the Board to modify fisheries harvest regulations and
customary and traditional use determinations must include the following
information:
a. Name, address, and telephone number of the requestor;
b. Each section and/or paragraph designation in this proposed rule
for which changes are suggested;
c. A statement explaining why each change is necessary;
d. Proposed wording changes; and
[[Page 2450]]
e. Any additional information that you believe will help the Board
in evaluating the proposed change.
The Board rejects proposals that fail to include the above
information, or proposals that are beyond the scope of authorities in
Sec. ----.24, subpart C (the regulations governing customary and
traditional use determinations), and Sec. Sec. ----.27, and ----.28,
subpart D (the specific regulations governing the subsistence take of
fish and shellfish). During the January 18, 2011 meeting, the Board may
defer review and action on some proposals to allow time for local
cooperative planning efforts, or to acquire additional needed
information. The Board may elect to defer taking action on any given
proposal if the workload of staff, Regional Councils, or the Board
becomes excessive. These deferrals may be based on recommendations by
the affected Regional Council(s) or staff members, or on the basis of
the Board's intention to do least harm to the subsistence user and the
resource involved. The Board may consider and act on alternatives that
address the intent of a proposal while differing in approach.
Tribal Consultation and Comment
As expressed in Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,'' the Federal officials
that have been delegated authority by the Secretaries are committed to
honoring the unique government-to-government political relationship
that exists between the Federal Government and Federally Recognized
Indian Tribes (Tribes) as listed in 73 FR 18553 (April 4, 2008). The
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act does not specifically
provide rights to Tribes for the subsistence taking of wildlife, fish,
and shellfish. However, because Tribal members are affected by
subsistence fishing, hunting, and trapping regulations, the Secretaries
have elected to provide Tribes an opportunity to consult on this rule.
The Secretaries will engage in outreach efforts for this rule,
including a notification letter, to ensure that Tribes are advised of
the mechanisms by which they can participate. The Board provides a
variety of opportunities for consultation: Proposing changes to the
existing rule; commenting on proposed changes to the existing rule;
engaging in dialogue at the Regional Advisory Council meetings;
engaging in dialogue at the Board's meetings; and providing input in
person, by mail, e-mail, or phone at any time during the rulemaking
process. The Secretaries will commit to efficiently and adequately
reviewing the government-to-government consultation process with regard
to subsistence rulemaking.
The Board will consider Tribes' information, input, and
recommendations, and address their concerns as much as practicable.
However, in keeping with ANILCA Sec. 805(c), the Board will follow
recommendations of the Regional Advisory Councils for the taking of
fish and wildlife unless their recommendation is determined to be not
supported by substantial evidence, violates recognized principles of
fish and wildlife conservation, or would be detrimental to the
satisfaction of subsistence needs. The Board will inform the Tribes how
their recommendations were considered.
Developing the 2011-13 Fish and Shellfish Seasons and Harvest Limit
Regulations
Subpart D regulations are subject to periodic review and revision.
The Federal Subsistence Board currently completes the process of
revising subsistence take of fish and shellfish regulations in odd-
numbered years and subsistence take of wildlife regulations in even-
numbered years; public proposal and review processes take place during
the preceding year. The Board also addresses customary and traditional
use determinations during the applicable cycle.
The text of the final rule published March 30, 2009 (74 FR 14049)
for the 2009-11 subparts C and D regulations is the text of this
proposed rule. The regulations established in that final rule are set
to expire March 31, 2011. However, those regulations will remain in
effect on April 1, 2011, unless subsequent Board action changes
elements as a result of the public review process outlined above in
this document.
Compliance With Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
National Environmental Policy Act
A Draft Environmental Impact Statement that described four
alternatives for developing a Federal Subsistence Management Program
was distributed for public comment on October 7, 1991. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was published on February 28,
1992. The Record of Decision (ROD) on Subsistence Management for
Federal Public Lands in Alaska was signed April 6, 1992. The selected
alternative in the FEIS (Alternative IV) defined the administrative
framework of an annual regulatory cycle for subsistence regulations.
A 1997 environmental assessment dealt with the expansion of Federal
jurisdiction over fisheries and is available at the office listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Secretary of the Interior, with
concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture, determined that expansion
of Federal jurisdiction does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the human environment and, therefore, signed a
Finding of No Significant Impact.
Section 810 of ANILCA
An ANILCA Section 810 analysis was completed as part of the FEIS
process on the Federal Subsistence Management Program. The intent of
all Federal subsistence regulations is to accord subsistence uses of
fish and wildlife on public lands a priority over the taking of fish
and wildlife on such lands for other purposes, unless restriction is
necessary to conserve healthy fish and wildlife populations. The final
section 810 analysis determination appeared in the April 6, 1992, ROD
and concluded that the Federal Subsistence Management Program, under
Alternative IV with an annual process for setting subsistence
regulations, may have some local impacts on subsistence uses, but will
not likely restrict subsistence uses significantly.
During the subsequent environmental assessment process for
extending fisheries jurisdiction, an evaluation of the effects of this
rule was conducted in accordance with section 810. That evaluation also
supported the Secretaries' determination that the rule will not reach
the ``may significantly restrict'' threshold that would require notice
and hearings under ANILCA section 810(a).
Paperwork Reduction Act
An agency may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. This
proposed rule does not contain any new collections of information that
require OMB approval. OMB has reviewed and approved the following
collections of information associated with the subsistence regulations
at 36 CFR 242 and 50 CFR 100:
(1) Subsistence hunting and fishing applications, permits, and
reports (OMB Control No. 1018-0075 expires December 31, 2009).
(2) Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Council Membership
[[Page 2451]]
Application/Nomination and Interview Forms (OMB Control No. 1018-0120,
expires March 31, 2012).
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
rule is not significant and has not reviewed this rule under Executive
Order 12866. OMB bases its determination upon the following four
criteria:
(a) Whether the rule will have an annual effect of $100 million or
more on the economy or adversely affect an economic sector,
productivity, jobs, the environment, or other units of the government.
(b) Whether the rule will create inconsistencies with other
agencies' actions.
(c) Whether the rule will materially affect entitlements, grants,
user fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of their
recipients.
(d) Whether the rule raises novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires preparation of flexibility analyses for rules that will have a
significant effect on a substantial number of small entities, which
include small businesses, organizations, or governmental jurisdictions.
In general, the resources to be harvested under this rule are already
being harvested and consumed by the local harvester and do not result
in an additional dollar benefit to the economy. However, we estimate
that 2 million pounds of meat are harvested by subsistence users
annually and, if given an estimated dollar value of $3.00 per pound,
this amount would equate to about $6 million in food value statewide.
Based upon the amounts and values cited above, the Departments certify
that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), this rule is not a major rule. It does not have an
effect on the economy of $100 million or more, will not cause a major
increase in costs or prices for consumers, and does not have
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Executive Order 12630
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the Secretaries to administer a
subsistence priority on public lands. The scope of this program is
limited by definition to certain public lands. Likewise, these
regulations have no potential takings of private property implications
as defined by Executive Order 12630.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Secretaries have determined and certify pursuant to the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this
rulemaking will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given
year on local or State governments or private entities. The
implementation of this rule is by Federal agencies and there is no cost
imposed on any State or local entities or Tribal governments.
Executive Order 12988
The Secretaries have determined that these regulations meet the
applicable standards provided in Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, regarding civil justice reform.
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the rule does not have
sufficient Federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment. Title VIII of ANILCA precludes the State from
exercising subsistence management authority over fish and wildlife
resources on Federal lands unless it meets certain requirements.
Executive Order 13175
The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act does not
specifically provide rights to Tribes for the subsistence taking of
wildlife, fish, and shellfish. However, the Secretaries have elected to
provide Tribes an opportunity to consult on this rule. The Board will
provide a variety of opportunities for consultation through: proposing
changes to the existing rule; commenting on proposed changes to the
existing rule; engaging in dialogue at the Regional Advisory Council
meetings; engaging in dialogue at the Board's meetings; and providing
input in person, by mail, e-mail, or phone at any time during the
rulemaking process.
Executive Order 13211
This Executive Order requires agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. However, this rule is
not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 13211, affecting energy
supply, distribution, or use, and no Statement of Energy Effects is
required.
Drafting Information
Theo Matuskowitz drafted these regulations under the guidance of
Peter J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence Management, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
Additional assistance was provided by:
Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office, Bureau of Land
Management;
Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy Swanton, Alaska Regional
Office, National Park Service;
Drs. Warren Eastland and Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional
Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs;
Jerry Berg and Carl Jack, Alaska Regional Office, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service; and
Calvin H. Casipit, Alaska Regional Office, U.S. Forest
Service.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Federal Subsistence
Board proposes to amend 36 CFR 242 and 50 CFR 100 for the 2011-12 and
2012-13 regulatory years. The text of the proposed amendments to 36 CFR
242.24, 242.27, and 242.28 and 50 CFR 100.24, 100.27, and 100.28 is the
final rule for the 2009-11 regulatory period (74 FR 14049; March 30,
2009), as modified by any subsequent Federal Subsistence Board action.
Dated: November 20, 2009.
Peter J. Probasco,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
Dated: November 23, 2009.
Calvin H. Casipit,
Acting Subsistence Program Leader, USDA-Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-688 Filed 1-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P; 4310-55-P