NIH State-of-the-Science Conference: Enhancing Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening, 2552-2553 [2010-666]

Download as PDF jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 2552 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2010 / Notices postmenopausal women. Very low intake of vitamin D can lead to the development of rickets, especially in those of African descent and other highly pigmented individuals. Although milk alternative products are typically fortified with vitamin D and other nutrients, they are often more expensive and less widely available than conventional products. The public health burden from deficiencies attributable to lactose intolerance is difficult to quantify. Additionally, it is challenging to identify and manage lactase nonpersisters. Questions remain as to the amount, if any, of lactose that can be tolerated by lactose nonpersisters and how best to assist these individuals in meeting recommended intakes. To examine these important issues, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Office of Medical Applications of Research of the National Institutes of Health will convene a Consensus Development Conference from February 22 to 24, 2010, to assess the available scientific evidence related to the following questions: • What is the prevalence of lactose intolerance, and how does this prevalence differ by race, ethnicity, and age? • What are the health outcomes of dairy exclusion diets? • What amount of daily lactose intake is tolerable in subjects with diagnosed lactose intolerance? • What strategies are effective in managing individuals with diagnosed lactose intolerance? • What are the future research needs for understanding and managing lactose intolerance? An impartial, independent panel will be charged with reviewing the available published literature in advance of the conference, including a systematic literature review commissioned through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The first day and a half of the conference will consist of presentations by expert researchers and practitioners and open public discussions. On Wednesday, February 24, the panel will present a statement of its collective assessment of the evidence to answer each of the questions above. The panel will also hold a press telebriefing to address questions from the media. The draft statement will be published online later that day, and the final version will be released approximately six weeks later. The primary sponsors of this meeting are the NIH Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:34 Jan 14, 2010 Jkt 220001 the NIH Office of Medical Applications of Research. Advance information about the conference and conference registration materials may be obtained from the NIH Consensus Development Program Information Center by calling 888–644– 2667 or by sending e-mail to consensus@mail.nih.gov. The Information Center’s mailing address is P.O. Box 2577, Kensington, Maryland 20891. Registration information is also available on the NIH Consensus Development Program Web site at https://consensus.nih.gov. Please Note: The NIH has instituted security measures to ensure the safety of NIH employees, guests, and property. All visitors must be prepared to show a photo ID upon request. Visitors may be required to pass through a metal detector and have bags, backpacks, or purses inspected or x-rayed as they enter NIH buildings. For more information about the security measures at NIH, please visit the Web site at https:// www.nih.gov/about/visitorsecurity.htm. Dated: January 7, 2010. Raynard S. Kington, Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health. [FR Doc. 2010–672 Filed 1–14–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health NIH State-of-the-Science Conference: Enhancing Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening Notice is hereby given by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of the ‘‘NIH State-of-the-Science Conference: Enhancing Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening’’ to be held February 2–4, 2010, in the NIH Natcher Conference Center, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. The conference will begin at 8:30 a.m. on February 2 and 3, and at 9 a.m. on February 4, and will be open to the public. Colorectal cancer is the secondleading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Approximately 50,000 people in the United States are expected to die from colorectal cancer in 2009. Colonic polyps, abnormal growths of tissue on the inner lining of the colon, are relatively common findings in men and women 50 years and older. Most of these growths are not cancerous, but one type of polyp, known as an adenoma, can develop into colorectal cancer. Screening tests for colorectal cancer generally either seek to identify and remove adenomas or PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 examine the stool for signs of early cancer in people who have no symptoms. A range of colorectal cancer screening tests is available in the United States. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force currently recommends that average-risk adults aged 50 to 75 years undergo screening for colorectal cancer with annual fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy (internal examination of the lower part of the large intestine) every 5 years, or colonoscopy (internal examination of the entire large intestine) every 10 years. Additional tests that may be used for colorectal cancer screening include computed tomography (CT) colonography and fecal DNA testing. Although colorectal cancer is an important cause of mortality in the United States, screening for this disease is currently underutilized among eligible individuals. Despite evidence supporting the value of screening, in 2005 only 50 percent of U.S. adults aged 50 and older had been screened according to guidelines. Rates of screening for colorectal cancer are consistently lower than those for other common cancers, particularly breast and cervical cancer. Reasons for this disparity are complex. Unlike most other preventive services, in colorectal cancer screening there are multiple test options from which to choose, and patients and providers may have varying preferences for or access to the tests. Successful completion of colorectal cancer screening requires effort on the part of the patient to obtain stool samples for testing or to clean the colon in preparation for endoscopic examination. Test options may also differ in cost and availability for a given community. Patient, provider, and healthcare system characteristics may each play a unique role in influencing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Adding to the complexity of this issue, colorectal cancer screening may be overused or misused in certain situations. Despite uncertainty regarding the benefit of removing small polyps, many people undergoing sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy have all identified growths removed. This may put them at increased risk for possible complications from these procedures, which can include rectal bleeding or colonic perforation (a tear in the wall of the intestine that can cause a serious abdominal infection). In addition, follow-up testing of individuals who have previously had polyps removed may occur more frequently than available evidence supports, which again may put people at risk for complications and have both cost and E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM 15JAN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2010 / Notices capacity implications for the healthcare system. To provide healthcare providers, patients, policy makers, and the general public with a comprehensive assessment of how colorectal cancer screening and surveillance are most appropriately implemented, monitored, and evaluated for average-risk populations in the United States, the National Cancer Institute and the Office of Medical Applications of Research of the National Institutes of Health will convene a State-of-the-Science Conference February 2–4, 2010, to assess the available scientific evidence related to the following questions: • What are the recent trends in the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening? • What factors influence the use of colorectal cancer screening? • Which strategies are effective in increasing the appropriate use of colorectal cancer screening and followup? • What are the current and projected capacities to deliver colorectal cancer screening and surveillance at the population level? • What are the effective approaches for monitoring the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening? • What research is needed to make the most progress and have the greatest public health impact in promoting the appropriate use of colorectal cancer screening? An impartial, independent panel will be charged with reviewing the available published literature in advance of the conference, including a systematic literature review commissioned through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The first day and a half of the conference will consist of presentations by expert researchers and practitioners and open public discussions. On Thursday, February 4, the panel will present a statement of its collective assessment of the evidence to answer each of the questions above. The panel will also hold a press telebriefing to address questions from the media. The draft statement will be published online later that day, and the final version will be released approximately six weeks later. The primary sponsors of this meeting are the NIH National Cancer Institute and the NIH Office of Medical Applications of Research. Advance information about the conference and conference registration materials may be obtained from the NIH Consensus Development Program Information Center by calling 888–644– 2667 or by sending e-mail to consensus@mail.nih.gov. The Information Center’s mailing address is VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:34 Jan 14, 2010 Jkt 220001 P.O. Box 2577, Kensington, Maryland 20891. Registration information is also available on the NIH Consensus Development Program Web site at https://consensus.nih.gov. Please Note: The NIH has instituted security measures to ensure the safety of employees, guests, and property. All visitors must be prepared to show a photo ID upon request. Visitors may be required to pass through a metal detector and have bags, backpacks, or purses inspected or x-rayed as they enter NIH buildings. For more information about the security measures at NIH, please visit the Web site at https:// www.nih.gov/about/visitorsecurity.htm. Dated: January 6, 2010. Raynard S. Kington, Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health. [FR Doc. 2010–666 Filed 1–14–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Moving Into the Future—New Dimensions and Strategies for Women’s Health Research for the National Institutes of Health; Notice Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research on Women’s Health (ORWH), Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, in collaboration with the Emory University School of Medicine will convene a public hearing and scientific workshop February 16–17, 2010, at Emory University School of Medicine, James B. Williams Medical Education Building, Atlanta, Georgia. Purpose of the Meeting With rapid advances in science and wider global understanding of women’s health and sex/gender contributions to well-being and disease, the purpose of the meeting is to ensure that NIH continues to support cutting edge women’s health research that is based upon the most advanced techniques and methodologies. The meeting format is designed to promote an interactive discussion involving leading scientists, advocacy groups, public policy experts, health care providers, and the general public. With a focus upon women’s cardiovascular health, the meeting at Emory University School of Medicine is convened to assist the ORWH and the NIH to move into the next decade of women’s health research. As science and technology advance and fields such as computational biology demonstrate the power of PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2553 interdisciplinary research, it remains critical for sex and gender factors to be integrated into broad experimental methodologies and scientific approaches across the lifespan. Biomedical and behavioral research are also necessary to understand how cultural, ethnic, and racial differences influence the causes, diagnosis, progression, treatment, and outcome of disease among different populations, including women of diverse geographic locations and socioeconomic backgrounds. Furthermore, health differences among diverse populations of women remain a critical area in need of continued focus and attention. The ORWH challenges all meeting attendees to assist the NIH in defining the women’s health research agenda of the future by thinking beyond traditional women’s health issues. With a special focus upon women’s cardiovascular health, ORWH and NIH ask meeting participants to consider creative strategies that need to be employed to identify areas of research that are best poised for advancement, identify innovative ways in which persistent issues of health and disease can be addressed, and explore new horizons of scientific concepts and investigative approaches. Attention also needs to be paid to new areas of science application, new technologies, and continuing basic science investigations. Clinical questions that are not currently the focus of research priorities need to be considered to ensure that women’s health research is optimally served and that the ORWH can continue to provide leadership for the benefit of women’s health, nationally and internationally. Meeting Format The meeting will consist of public testimony, scientific panels and seven concurrent scientific working groups. Specifically, on February 16, individuals representing a full spectrum of organizations interested in biomedical and behavioral research on women’s health issues will have an opportunity to provide public testimony from 10:30 a.m.–12 p.m. The seven concurrent scientific working groups meeting on February 16 in afternoon sessions will focus on a range of women’s cardiovascular health issues, including the following: pregnancy and cardiovascular disease research and ethical considerations; cardiovascular disease in elderly and frail elderly women—optimal management and research; microvascular disease, biomechanics, and application of new technologies to cardiovascular research; stem cells, progenitor cells, and the vista of cardiovascular regenerative E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM 15JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2552-2553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


NIH State-of-the-Science Conference: Enhancing Use and Quality of 
Colorectal Cancer Screening

    Notice is hereby given by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 
of the ``NIH State-of-the-Science Conference: Enhancing Use and Quality 
of Colorectal Cancer Screening'' to be held February 2-4, 2010, in the 
NIH Natcher Conference Center, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892. The conference will begin at 8:30 a.m. on February 2 and 3, and 
at 9 a.m. on February 4, and will be open to the public.
    Colorectal cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer-related 
deaths in the United States. Approximately 50,000 people in the United 
States are expected to die from colorectal cancer in 2009. Colonic 
polyps, abnormal growths of tissue on the inner lining of the colon, 
are relatively common findings in men and women 50 years and older. 
Most of these growths are not cancerous, but one type of polyp, known 
as an adenoma, can develop into colorectal cancer. Screening tests for 
colorectal cancer generally either seek to identify and remove adenomas 
or examine the stool for signs of early cancer in people who have no 
symptoms. A range of colorectal cancer screening tests is available in 
the United States. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force currently 
recommends that average-risk adults aged 50 to 75 years undergo 
screening for colorectal cancer with annual fecal occult blood testing, 
sigmoidoscopy (internal examination of the lower part of the large 
intestine) every 5 years, or colonoscopy (internal examination of the 
entire large intestine) every 10 years. Additional tests that may be 
used for colorectal cancer screening include computed tomography (CT) 
colonography and fecal DNA testing.
    Although colorectal cancer is an important cause of mortality in 
the United States, screening for this disease is currently 
underutilized among eligible individuals. Despite evidence supporting 
the value of screening, in 2005 only 50 percent of U.S. adults aged 50 
and older had been screened according to guidelines. Rates of screening 
for colorectal cancer are consistently lower than those for other 
common cancers, particularly breast and cervical cancer. Reasons for 
this disparity are complex. Unlike most other preventive services, in 
colorectal cancer screening there are multiple test options from which 
to choose, and patients and providers may have varying preferences for 
or access to the tests. Successful completion of colorectal cancer 
screening requires effort on the part of the patient to obtain stool 
samples for testing or to clean the colon in preparation for endoscopic 
examination. Test options may also differ in cost and availability for 
a given community. Patient, provider, and healthcare system 
characteristics may each play a unique role in influencing the use and 
quality of colorectal cancer screening.
    Adding to the complexity of this issue, colorectal cancer screening 
may be overused or misused in certain situations. Despite uncertainty 
regarding the benefit of removing small polyps, many people undergoing 
sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy have all identified growths removed. This 
may put them at increased risk for possible complications from these 
procedures, which can include rectal bleeding or colonic perforation (a 
tear in the wall of the intestine that can cause a serious abdominal 
infection). In addition, follow-up testing of individuals who have 
previously had polyps removed may occur more frequently than available 
evidence supports, which again may put people at risk for complications 
and have both cost and

[[Page 2553]]

capacity implications for the healthcare system.
    To provide healthcare providers, patients, policy makers, and the 
general public with a comprehensive assessment of how colorectal cancer 
screening and surveillance are most appropriately implemented, 
monitored, and evaluated for average-risk populations in the United 
States, the National Cancer Institute and the Office of Medical 
Applications of Research of the National Institutes of Health will 
convene a State-of-the-Science Conference February 2-4, 2010, to assess 
the available scientific evidence related to the following questions:
     What are the recent trends in the use and quality of 
colorectal cancer screening?
     What factors influence the use of colorectal cancer 
screening?
     Which strategies are effective in increasing the 
appropriate use of colorectal cancer screening and follow-up?
     What are the current and projected capacities to deliver 
colorectal cancer screening and surveillance at the population level?
     What are the effective approaches for monitoring the use 
and quality of colorectal cancer screening?
     What research is needed to make the most progress and have 
the greatest public health impact in promoting the appropriate use of 
colorectal cancer screening?
    An impartial, independent panel will be charged with reviewing the 
available published literature in advance of the conference, including 
a systematic literature review commissioned through the Agency for 
Healthcare Research and Quality. The first day and a half of the 
conference will consist of presentations by expert researchers and 
practitioners and open public discussions. On Thursday, February 4, the 
panel will present a statement of its collective assessment of the 
evidence to answer each of the questions above. The panel will also 
hold a press telebriefing to address questions from the media. The 
draft statement will be published online later that day, and the final 
version will be released approximately six weeks later. The primary 
sponsors of this meeting are the NIH National Cancer Institute and the 
NIH Office of Medical Applications of Research.
    Advance information about the conference and conference 
registration materials may be obtained from the NIH Consensus 
Development Program Information Center by calling 888-644-2667 or by 
sending e-mail to consensus@mail.nih.gov. The Information Center's 
mailing address is P.O. Box 2577, Kensington, Maryland 20891. 
Registration information is also available on the NIH Consensus 
Development Program Web site at https://consensus.nih.gov.

    Please Note: The NIH has instituted security measures to ensure 
the safety of employees, guests, and property. All visitors must be 
prepared to show a photo ID upon request. Visitors may be required 
to pass through a metal detector and have bags, backpacks, or purses 
inspected or x-rayed as they enter NIH buildings. For more 
information about the security measures at NIH, please visit the Web 
site at https://www.nih.gov/about/visitorsecurity.htm.


    Dated: January 6, 2010.
Raynard S. Kington,
Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-666 Filed 1-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.