Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Global Undergraduate Exchange Program for Pakistan, 2181-2186 [2010-610]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission,9 all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of NYSE Amex. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–NYSEAmex–2009–102 and should
be submitted on or before February 4,
2010.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–542 Filed 1–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 6821]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: DS–4100, Iran Program
Grants Vetting, Information Collection
1405–0176
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments.
SUMMARY: The Department of State is
seeking Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approval for the
information collection described below.
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60
days for public comment in the Federal
Register preceding submission to OMB.
We are conducting this process in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
9 The text of the proposed rule change is available
on the Commission’s Web site at https://
www.sec.gov.
10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:36 Jan 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Title of Information Collection: Iran
Program Grants
• OMB Control Number: 1405–0176
• Type of Request: Extension of a
Currently Approved Collection
• Originating Office: Office of Iranian
Affairs, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
(NEA/IR)
• Form Number: DS–4100
• Respondents: Potential grantees and
participants for Iran programs
• Estimated Number of Respondents:
100
• Estimated Number of Responses:
200
• Average Hours Per Response: 1
• Total Estimated Burden: 200
• Frequency: On occasion
• Obligation to Respond: Required to
Obtain
DATE(S): The Department will accept
comments from the public up to 60 days
from January 14, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct requests for additional
information regarding the collection
listed in this notice, including requests
for copies of the proposed information
collection and supporting documents, to
Danika Walters, Bureau of Near Eastern
Affairs, U.S. Department of State,
Washington, DC 20520, who may be
reached on 202–647–1347, or via e-mail
at WaltersDL@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are
soliciting public comments to permit
the Department to:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our
functions.
• Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the reporting burden on
those who are to respond, including the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of technology.
Abstract of Proposed Collection
The State Department has made the
awarding of grants a key component of
its Iran policy. As a condition of
licensing these activities, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
mandates that the Department conduct
a vetting of potential Iran programs
grantees and sub-grantees for counterterrorism purposes. To conduct this
vetting the Department envisions
collecting information from grantees
and sub-grantees regarding the identity
and background of their key employees,
board of directors, and program
participants.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2181
Methodology
We will collect this information either
through fax or electronic submission.
Additional Information
Provide background or other
information as applicable or useful. This
is optional.
Dated: January 5, 2010.
Sara Horner,
Office Director, Office of Iranian Affairs,
Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–599 Filed 1–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6865]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Global Undergraduate
Exchange Program for Pakistan
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A/E/SCA–10–01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number: 19.009.
Key Dates: Application Deadline:
February 15, 2010.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Academic Exchange Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs announces an open competition
to administer the FY2010 Global
Undergraduate Exchange Program for
Pakistan. Public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 USC 501(c)(3) in the United
States may submit proposals to organize
and carry out academic exchange
activities for students from
underrepresented sectors in Pakistan.
The recipient organization will be
responsible for the following aspects of
the program: Placement of no less than
100 foreign students at accredited U.S.
institutions (50 for fall semester 2010,
50 spring semester 2011) student travel
to the U.S., orientation, enrichment
programming, advising, monitoring and
support, pre-return activities,
evaluation, and follow-up with program
alumni. Support for this program is
being provided from special FY2009/
FY2010 supplemental funds that have
been appropriated to the Department. It
is anticipated that the total amount of
funding for FY2010 administrative and
program costs will be $2,000,000
pending availability of funds.
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
2182
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making
authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87–
256, as amended, also known as the
Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries * * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations
by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * *
and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.’’ The
funding authority for the program above
is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The principal objective of
the Global Undergraduate Exchange
Program for Pakistan (herein referred to
as the ‘‘Global UGRAD—Pakistan’’) is to
provide a substantive exchange
experience at a U.S. college or
university to a diverse group of
emerging student leaders from
underrepresented sectors in Pakistan. In
this context, the recipient organization
should ensure that participants are able
to enroll full-time in courses at U.S.
institutions alongside U.S. peers, and
provide the participants with
opportunities and enrichment activities
designed to help them understand the
U.S. and U.S. citizens inside and
outside the classroom.
Participants will return to their home
countries at the conclusion of the
exchange program to re-enter colleges
and universities there, and re-integrate
with their home societies.
An objective of the program is to
provide participants with tailored
instruction in the academic skills and
study habits required to be successful at
the undergraduate level as well as be
better prepared for higher level studies
in the U.S. in the future.
The Global UGRAD—Pakistan will
provide no less than 100 scholarships—
50 for fall semester, 50 for spring
semester—at U.S. institutions of higher
education to outstanding students from
non-elite sectors in Pakistan.
Scholarships will be granted primarily
to students who are currently enrolled
in an undergraduate degree program in
their home country, although students
just completing their final year of high
school will also be eligible. The
recipient organization will place
participants in non-degree programs at
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:36 Jan 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
both two- and four-year U.S. colleges
and universities.
The recipient organization should
develop enrichment activities to
enhance the participants’ academic
education, including having students
participate in community service and
make local presentations about their
countries. All participants are required
to return to their home countries
immediately upon the conclusion of the
program. Transfers of academic program
or visa sponsorship of participants to
another U.S. institution will not be
considered.
ECA will award one cooperative
agreement for this program. Programs
and projects must conform to Bureau
requirements and guidelines outlined in
the Solicitation Package. ECA programs
are subject to the availability of funds.
Programs must comply with J–1 Visa
regulations. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for further
information.
In a cooperative agreement, the South
and Central Asia Programs Branch of the
Office of Academic Exchange Programs
in the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs (ECA/A/E/SCA) is
substantially involved in program
activities above and beyond routine
grant monitoring. ECA/A/E/SCA
activities and responsibilities for this
program are, but not limited to, the
following:
1. Participating in the design and
direction of program activities;
2. Approval of key personnel;
3. Final selection of program
participants;
4. Approval and input for all program
agendas and timelines;
5. Final approval of all student
placements;
6. Final approval of internship
placements;
7. Guidance in execution of all project
components;
8. Arrangement for State Department
speakers during workshops;
9. Assistance with participant
emergencies;
10. Providing background information
related to participants’ home countries
and cultures; and
11. Liaison with Public Affairs
Sections of the U.S. Embassies and
country desk officers at the State
Department.
Note: All materials, publicity, and
correspondence related to the program must
acknowledge this as a program of the Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S.
Department of State. The Bureau will retain
copyright use of and distribute materials
related to this program as it sees fit.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY2010.
Approximate Total Funding:
$2,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, the anticipated
program start date will be May 1, 2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
December 31, 2011.
Additional Information: At this time,
support for this program is being
provided from special one-time FY2009/
FY2010 supplemental funds that have
been appropriated to the Department. In
the event that additional funds become
available in fiscal years 2011 and 2012,
and pending successful implementation
of the FY2010 funded program, ECA
reserves the right to renew this grant for
two additional fiscal years before openly
competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 USC 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost-Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal Government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a) Bureau grant guidelines require that
organizations with less than four years
of experience in conducting
international exchange programs will be
limited to $60,000. ECA anticipates
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices
awarding one grant, in the amount of up
to $2,000,000 to support the program
and administrative costs required to
implement the program. Therefore,
applicant organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting
international exchange programs are
ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages
applications to provide the maximum
levels of cost sharing and funding to in
support of its program.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information To Request an
Application Package:
Please contact the South and Central
Asia Programs Branch, Office of
Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/A/
E/SCA, SA–5 Floor 4, U.S. Department
of State, Washington, DC 20522–0504,
202–632–3270, Fax: 202–632–9411 or
AlamiLT@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/
E/SCA–10–01 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Program Officer,
Theresa Drake, and refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/SCA–
10–01 on all other inquiries and
correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet:
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/
open2.html, or from the Grants.gov Web
site at https://www.grants.gov. Please
read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:36 Jan 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
per the instructions under IV.3f.,
Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009,
all applicants for ECA federal assistance
awards must include in their
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will also
be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
be transmitted by the State Department
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2183
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to all Regulations
Governing the J Visa: The Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs is
placing renewed emphasis on the secure
and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by grantees and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa.
Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to
meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, recordkeeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The award recipient will be
responsible for issuing DS–2019 forms
to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: Office of Designation, ECA/EC/
D, SA–5, Floor C2, Department of State,
Washington, DC 20522–0582.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted in
the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and physical challenges.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
2184
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
award recipient will track participants
or partners and be able to respond to
key evaluation questions, including
satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and
effects of the program on institutions
(institutions in which participants work
or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding
as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable, attainable,
results-oriented, and placed in a
reasonable time frame), the easier it will
be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:36 Jan 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
The recipient organization will be
required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau
in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: i.e.
sustainability, overall program
management, staffing, coordination with
ECA and PAS or any other
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
1. Participant expenses.
2. Administrative costs.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: February
15, 2010.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/SCA–
10–01.
Methods of Submission: Applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2.) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages
organizations interested in applying for this
competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1.,
below rather than submitting electronically
through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high
volume of grant proposals that will be
submitted via the Grants.gov webportal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package.
As stated in this RFGP, ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and eight (8) copies of
the application should be sent to: Office
of Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/
A/E/SCA, SA–5, 4th Floor, 2200 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk.
The Bureau will provide these files
electronically to the appropriate Public
Affairs Section(s) at the U.S. embassies
for their review.
IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic
Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages
organizations interested in applying for this
competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1.
above, rather than submitting electronically
through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high
volume of grant proposals that will be
submitted via the Grants.gov webportal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package.
As stated in this RFGP, ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:36 Jan 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount
of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a
variety of factors including the size of
the application and the speed of your
Internet connection. In addition,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to:
Grants.gov Customer Support
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the difference
between a submission receipt and a
submission validation. Applicants will
receive a validation e-mail from
grants.gov upon the successful
submission of an application. Again,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2185
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process: The Bureau will
review all proposals for technical
eligibility. Proposals will be deemed
ineligible if they do not fully adhere to
the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative
agreements resides with the Bureau’s
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program idea:
Proposals should exhibit originality,
substance, precision, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission.
2. Ability to achieve program
objectives: Detailed agenda and relevant
work plan should demonstrate
substantive undertakings and logistical
capacity. Agenda and plan should
adhere to the program overview and
guidelines described above. Objectives
should be reasonable, feasible, and
flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will
meet the program’s objectives and plan.
3. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
2186
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Notices
5. Institution’s Record/Capacity:
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as
determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The
Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
6. Project Evaluation and Follow-on:
Proposals should include a plan to
evaluate the activity’s success, both as
the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives is recommended. Proposals
should also provide a plan for
continued follow-on activity (with
minimal Bureau support) ensuring that
Bureau supported programs are not
isolated events.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing:
The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
8. Value to U.S.-Partner Country
Relations: Proposed projects should
receive positive assessments by the U.S.
Department of State’s geographic area
desk and overseas officers of program
need, potential impact, and significance
in the partner countries.
pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive an Federal Assistance Award
(FAA) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements: Terms and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:36 Jan 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
Conditions for the Administration of
ECA agreements include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles for
State, Local and Indian Governments.’’
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants;
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following
reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
(3) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
Optional Program Data Requirements:
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the grant or who
benefit from the grant funding but do
not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Theresa Drake,
South and Central Asia Programs
Branch, Office of Academic Exchange
Programs, ECA/A/E/SCA, SA–5 Floor 4,
U.S. Department of State, Washington,
DC 20522–0504, (202) 632–3277 and
Fax: 202–632–9411, https://
www.exchanges.state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/E/
SCA–10–01. Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions
published in this RFGP are binding and
may not be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: January 5, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–610 Filed 1–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2181-2186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-610]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6865]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Global Undergraduate Exchange Program for Pakistan
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A/E/SCA-10-01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.009.
Key Dates: Application Deadline: February 15, 2010.
Executive Summary: The Office of Academic Exchange Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs announces an open
competition to administer the FY2010 Global Undergraduate Exchange
Program for Pakistan. Public and private non-profit organizations
meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code section 26
USC 501(c)(3) in the United States may submit proposals to organize and
carry out academic exchange activities for students from
underrepresented sectors in Pakistan. The recipient organization will
be responsible for the following aspects of the program: Placement of
no less than 100 foreign students at accredited U.S. institutions (50
for fall semester 2010, 50 spring semester 2011) student travel to the
U.S., orientation, enrichment programming, advising, monitoring and
support, pre-return activities, evaluation, and follow-up with program
alumni. Support for this program is being provided from special FY2009/
FY2010 supplemental funds that have been appropriated to the
Department. It is anticipated that the total amount of funding for
FY2010 administrative and program costs will be $2,000,000 pending
availability of funds.
[[Page 2182]]
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961,
Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act.
The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the
United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen
the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of
the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to
assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and the other countries of the
world.'' The funding authority for the program above is provided
through legislation.
Purpose: The principal objective of the Global Undergraduate
Exchange Program for Pakistan (herein referred to as the ``Global
UGRAD--Pakistan'') is to provide a substantive exchange experience at a
U.S. college or university to a diverse group of emerging student
leaders from underrepresented sectors in Pakistan. In this context, the
recipient organization should ensure that participants are able to
enroll full-time in courses at U.S. institutions alongside U.S. peers,
and provide the participants with opportunities and enrichment
activities designed to help them understand the U.S. and U.S. citizens
inside and outside the classroom.
Participants will return to their home countries at the conclusion
of the exchange program to re-enter colleges and universities there,
and re-integrate with their home societies.
An objective of the program is to provide participants with
tailored instruction in the academic skills and study habits required
to be successful at the undergraduate level as well as be better
prepared for higher level studies in the U.S. in the future.
The Global UGRAD--Pakistan will provide no less than 100
scholarships--50 for fall semester, 50 for spring semester--at U.S.
institutions of higher education to outstanding students from non-elite
sectors in Pakistan. Scholarships will be granted primarily to students
who are currently enrolled in an undergraduate degree program in their
home country, although students just completing their final year of
high school will also be eligible. The recipient organization will
place participants in non-degree programs at both two- and four-year
U.S. colleges and universities.
The recipient organization should develop enrichment activities to
enhance the participants' academic education, including having students
participate in community service and make local presentations about
their countries. All participants are required to return to their home
countries immediately upon the conclusion of the program. Transfers of
academic program or visa sponsorship of participants to another U.S.
institution will not be considered.
ECA will award one cooperative agreement for this program. Programs
and projects must conform to Bureau requirements and guidelines
outlined in the Solicitation Package. ECA programs are subject to the
availability of funds.
Programs must comply with J-1 Visa regulations. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for further information.
In a cooperative agreement, the South and Central Asia Programs
Branch of the Office of Academic Exchange Programs in the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA/A/E/SCA) is substantially
involved in program activities above and beyond routine grant
monitoring. ECA/A/E/SCA activities and responsibilities for this
program are, but not limited to, the following:
1. Participating in the design and direction of program activities;
2. Approval of key personnel;
3. Final selection of program participants;
4. Approval and input for all program agendas and timelines;
5. Final approval of all student placements;
6. Final approval of internship placements;
7. Guidance in execution of all project components;
8. Arrangement for State Department speakers during workshops;
9. Assistance with participant emergencies;
10. Providing background information related to participants' home
countries and cultures; and
11. Liaison with Public Affairs Sections of the U.S. Embassies and
country desk officers at the State Department.
Note: All materials, publicity, and correspondence related to
the program must acknowledge this as a program of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. The
Bureau will retain copyright use of and distribute materials related
to this program as it sees fit.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY2010.
Approximate Total Funding: $2,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, the
anticipated program start date will be May 1, 2010.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: December 31, 2011.
Additional Information: At this time, support for this program is
being provided from special one-time FY2009/FY2010 supplemental funds
that have been appropriated to the Department. In the event that
additional funds become available in fiscal years 2011 and 2012, and
pending successful implementation of the FY2010 funded program, ECA
reserves the right to renew this grant for two additional fiscal years
before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 USC 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost-Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal Government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements: (a) Bureau grant guidelines
require that organizations with less than four years of experience in
conducting international exchange programs will be limited to $60,000.
ECA anticipates
[[Page 2183]]
awarding one grant, in the amount of up to $2,000,000 to support the
program and administrative costs required to implement the program.
Therefore, applicant organizations with less than four years experience
in conducting international exchange programs are ineligible to apply
under this competition. The Bureau encourages applications to provide
the maximum levels of cost sharing and funding to in support of its
program.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed,
Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the
proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information To Request an Application Package:
Please contact the South and Central Asia Programs Branch, Office
of Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/A/E/SCA, SA-5 Floor 4, U.S.
Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0504, 202-632-3270, Fax: 202-
632-9411 or AlamiLT@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please
refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/SCA-10-01 located at
the top of this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Program Officer, Theresa Drake, and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/SCA-10-01 on all other inquiries and
correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet:
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/open2.html, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov. Please read all
information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under IV.3f., Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one
of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one-page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or
if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to all Regulations Governing the J Visa: The
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is placing renewed emphasis
on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa)
Programs and adherence by grantees and sponsors to all regulations
governing the J visa. Therefore, proposals should demonstrate the
applicant's capacity to meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR
62, including the oversight of Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
recordkeeping, reporting and other requirements.
The award recipient will be responsible for issuing DS-2019 forms
to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: Office of Designation, ECA/EC/D, SA-5,
Floor C2, Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0582.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and physical
challenges. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in program administration and in
program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the `Support
for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
[[Page 2184]]
104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of educational and
cultural exchange in countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom
and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.'' Public Law 106-113 requires that
the governments of the countries described above do not have
inappropriate influence in the selection process. Proposals should
reflect advancement of these goals in their program contents, to the
full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the award
recipient will track participants or partners and be able to respond to
key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of
the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions
in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual
understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
The recipient organization will be required to provide reports
analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and
contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years
and provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: i.e. sustainability, overall
program management, staffing, coordination with ECA and PAS or any
other requirements.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase,
location, or activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
1. Participant expenses.
2. Administrative costs.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: February 15, 2010.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/SCA-10-01.
Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two
ways:
(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal
Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2.) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages organizations interested
in applying for this competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1., below rather than
submitting electronically through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high volume of grant
proposals that will be submitted via the Grants.gov webportal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package. As stated in this RFGP,
ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for proposals submitted via
Grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline
[[Page 2185]]
will be ineligible for further consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and eight (8) copies of the application should be sent
to: Office of Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/A/E/SCA, SA-5, 4th Floor,
2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will
provide these files electronically to the appropriate Public Affairs
Section(s) at the U.S. embassies for their review.
IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages organizations interested in
applying for this competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1. above, rather than
submitting electronically through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high volume of grant
proposals that will be submitted via the Grants.gov webportal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package. As stated in this RFGP,
ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for proposals submitted via
Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov. Once
registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. In addition,
validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can take up to
two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to:
Grants.gov Customer Support
Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726.
Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: grants.gov">support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process: The Bureau will review all proposals for
technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do
not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with
Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau
grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the
Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final
funding decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State's
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative agreements resides with the
Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program idea: Proposals should exhibit
originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the Bureau's
mission.
2. Ability to achieve program objectives: Detailed agenda and
relevant work plan should demonstrate substantive undertakings and
logistical capacity. Agenda and plan should adhere to the program
overview and guidelines described above. Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities).
[[Page 2186]]
5. Institution's Record/Capacity: Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as determined by Bureau Grants
Staff. The Bureau will consider the past performance of prior
recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants.
6. Project Evaluation and Follow-on: Proposals should include a
plan to evaluate the activity's success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives is recommended. Proposals should also
provide a plan for continued follow-on activity (with minimal Bureau
support) ensuring that Bureau supported programs are not isolated
events.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be
kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and
appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other
private sector support as well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
8. Value to U.S.-Partner Country Relations: Proposed projects
should receive positive assessments by the U.S. Department of State's
geographic area desk and overseas officers of program need, potential
impact, and significance in the partner countries.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Federal
Assistance Award (FAA) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the
original proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall
be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the
following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian Governments.''
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants; https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
(3) A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
Optional Program Data Requirements: Organizations awarded grants
will be required to maintain specific data on program participants and
activities in an electronically accessible database format that can be
shared with the Bureau as required. As a minimum, the data must include
the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the grant or
who benefit from the grant funding but do not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to
the official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Theresa Drake,
South and Central Asia Programs Branch, Office of Academic Exchange
Programs, ECA/A/E/SCA, SA-5 Floor 4, U.S. Department of State,
Washington, DC 20522-0504, (202) 632-3277 and Fax: 202-632-9411, https://www.exchanges.state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/A/E/SCA-10-01. Please read the
complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals.
Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this
competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been
completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding
and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory
information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language
will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award
commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right
to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the
needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be
subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section
VI.3 above.
Dated: January 5, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-610 Filed 1-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P