Termination of the Environmental Impact Statement for the General Management Plan, Gila Cliff Dwellings National Monument, 1802-1803 [2010-443]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
1802
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2010 / Notices
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, as amended, and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Palm Springs
South Coast Field Office, Palm Springs,
California, intends to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for First Solar Inc.’s application for a
right-of-way authorization to develop a
solar photovoltaic generating facility.
The EIS may also support an
amendment to the California Desert
Conservation Area (CDCA) Plan (1980),
as amended; by this notice the BLM is
announcing the beginning of the
scoping process to solicit public
comments and identify issues.
DATES: This notice initiates the public
scoping process for the EIS and possible
plan amendment. Comments on issues
may be submitted in writing until
February 12, 2010. The date(s) and
location(s) of any scoping meetings will
be announced at least 15 days in
advance through the local media, and
the BLM Web site at: https://
www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/
palmsprings.html. In order to be
considered in the Draft EIS, all
comments must be received prior to the
close of the scoping period or 15 days
after the last public meeting, whichever
is later. The BLM will provide
additional opportunities for public
participation upon publication of the
Draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on issues and planning criteria related
to the First Solar Desert Sunlight Solar
Farm Draft EIS/Plan Amendment by any
of the following methods:
• Web site: https://www.blm.gov/ca/st/
en/fo/palmsprings.html;
• E-mail: CAPSSolarFirstSolar
DesertSunlight@blm.gov;
• Fax: (760) 833–7199; or
• Mail: Allison Shaffer, Project
Manager, Palm Springs South Coast
Field Office, BLM, 1201 Bird Center
Drive, Palm Springs, California 92262.
Documents pertinent to this proposal
may be examined at the Palm Springs
South Coast Field Office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information or to have your
name added to our mailing list, contact
Allison Shaffer, BLM Project Manager,
telephone (760) 833–7100; address Palm
Springs South Coast Field Office, BLM,
1201 Bird Center Drive, Palm Springs,
California 92262; e-mail
CAPSSolarFirstSolarDesertSunlight@
blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
applicant, First Solar Inc., has requested
a right-of-way authorization to develop
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Jan 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
a solar photovoltaic generating facility
with a proposed output of 550
megawatts and a project footprint of
approximately 4,410 acres. The
proposed project would be located on
BLM-administered lands in Riverside
County approximately 6 miles north of
the rural community of Desert Center,
California. The overall site layout and
generalized land uses would include a
substation, an administration building,
operations and maintenance facilities, a
transmission line, and temporary
construction lay down areas. The
project’s 230-kilovolt (kV) generation
interconnection transmission line also
would be located on BLM-administered
lands and would utilize a planned 230to 500-kV substation (referred to as the
Red Bluff substation). The Red Bluff
substation would connect the project to
the Southern California Edison regional
transmission grid. Should the project be
approved, the interconnection
transmission line would be about 9
miles to about 13 miles long, depending
on the alternative selected. If approved,
construction would begin in late 2010
and would take approximately 41
months to complete.
The purpose of the public scoping
process is to determine relevant issues
that will influence the scope of the
environmental analysis, including
alternatives, and guide the process for
developing the EIS. At present, the BLM
has identified the following preliminary
issues: Air quality, biological resources,
recreation, cultural resources, water
resources, geological resources, special
management areas, land use, noise,
paleontological resources, public health,
socioeconomic, soils, traffic and
transportation, visual resources, and
other issues. Authorization of this
proposal may require amendment of the
CDCA Plan. By this notice, the BLM is
complying with requirements in 43 CFR
1610.2(c) to notify the public of
potential amendments to land use plans,
based on the findings of the EIS. If a
land use plan amendment is necessary,
the BLM will integrate the land use
planning process with the NEPA
process for this project.
The BLM will use and coordinate the
NEPA commenting process to satisfy the
public involvement process for Section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470f) as
provided for in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3).
Native American tribal consultations
will be conducted and tribal concerns,
including impacts on Indian trust assets,
will be given appropriate consideration.
Federal, State, and local agencies—
along with other stakeholders who may
be interested or affected by the BLM’s
decision on this project—are invited to
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
participate in the scoping process and,
if eligible, may request or be requested
by the BLM to participate as a
cooperating agency.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Thomas Pogacnik,
Deputy State Director, California.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 43 CFR
1610.2.
[FR Doc. 2010–403 Filed 1–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Termination of the Environmental
Impact Statement for the General
Management Plan, Gila Cliff Dwellings
National Monument
AGENCY: National Park Service,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of termination of the
Environmental Impact Statement for the
General Management Plan, Gila Cliff
Dwellings National Monument, New
Mexico.
SUMMARY: The National Park Service
(NPS) is terminating the Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the Gila Cliff
Dwellings General Management Plan
because it has determined that an
Environmental Assessment (EA) is the
more appropriate National
Environmental Policy Act compliance
document. A Notice of Intent to prepare
the EIS for the Gila Cliff Dwellings
General Management Plan was
published on April 16, 2008 (Federal
Register Vol. 73, No. 74). Scoping
conducted for the plan indicated that
there were no significant impacts or
controversy identified by the public. A
preliminary impact analysis indicated
that the alternatives have limited
potential to result in significant/major
effects on the human environment as
they focus on different ways of
protecting resources, providing
appropriate visitor experiences, and
addressing joint NPS/Forest Service
operations. For these reasons the NPS
determined the proposal would not
require an EIS.
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2010 / Notices
DATES: The request to terminate the
Environmental Impact Statement and
proceed with an Environmental
Assessment was approved by the Chief
of the NPS Environmental Quality
Division on November 4, 2009. The
draft general management plan and
Environmental Assessment is expected
to be distributed for a 30 day public
comment period early in 2011 and a
decision is expected be made in the fall
of 2011. The NPS will notify the public
by mail, Web site, and other means, and
will include information on where and
how to obtain a copy of the GMP/EA,
how to comment on the plan, and the
dates of the public comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Riley, Superintendent, Gila Cliff
Dwellings National Monument, HC 68
Box 100, Silver City, NM 88061.
Telephone (575) 536–9461.
In place of
the EIS, the NPS will prepare an
Environmental Assessment (EA) that
analyzes four alternatives (no-action and
three action alternatives) that look at
different ways of protecting resources,
providing appropriate visitor
experiences, and addressing joint NPS/
Forest Service operations:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
—Alternative 1 (No-Action) would
continue the present management
direction.
—Alternative 2 would emphasize and
expand high-quality visitor services
and experiences by providing more
comprehensive interpretation of the
Gila Headwaters area and its 2,000
years of human occupation.
—Alternative 3 would enhance visitor
understanding and enjoyment of the
Gila Headwaters’ natural and cultural
heritage by providing a more unified
management approach to the two
units of the monument.
—Alternative 4 would forge more
personal connections between visitors
and the ancient cultures and
wilderness character of the
monument.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: November 12, 2009.
Michael D. Snyder,
Director, Intermountain Region, National
Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–443 Filed 1–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–FA–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Jan 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2009–N162; 40136–1265–0000–
S3]
1803
a haven for a diversity of native flora
and fauna, including endemic,
threatened, endangered, and candidate
species.
Introduction
Key West NWR
Located west of Key West and
accessible only by boat, the refuge
consists of the Marquesas Keys and 13
other keys distributed across over 375
square miles of open water. Key West
NWR is among the first refuges
established in the United States.
President Roosevelt created the refuge
in 1908 as a preserve and breeding
ground for colonial nesting birds and
other wildlife. The refuge encompasses
208,308 acres of land and water with
only 1 percent (2,019 acres) being land.
Most islands are dominated by
mangrove plant communities.
The refuge provides habitat and
protection for Federally listed species,
including piping plovers and roseate
terns. The refuge harbors the largest
wintering population of piping plovers
and the largest colony of white-crowned
pigeons in the Florida Keys. It is a
haven for over 250 species of birds,
including 10 wading-bird species that
nest in the refuge. Other notable
imperiled species include sea turtles.
More loggerhead and green sea turtle
nests are found each year in Key West
NWR than in any area of the Florida
Keys except the Dry Tortugas. Waters
within the refuge’s administrative
boundaries are important
developmental habitat for these sea
turtle species, as well as hawksbills and
Kemp’s ridley sea turtles. In 1975,
Public Law 93–632 designated all
islands in Key West NWR, except
Ballast Key, which is privately owned,
as a part of the National Wilderness
Preservation System. These islands total
2,109 acres.
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for the Lower Florida Keys
Refuges. We started this process through
a notice in the Federal Register on May
9, 2003 (68 FR 25058).
The Lower Florida Keys Refuges
includes three wildlife refuges—Key
West National Wildlife Refuge (Key
West NWR), Great White Heron
National Wildlife Refuge (Great White
Heron NWR), and National Key Deer
Refuge in Monroe County, Florida.
These are a collection of low-lying,
subtropical islands between the Gulf of
Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean that
protect all the vital habitats
representative of the Florida Keys
ecosystem, including the globally
imperiled pine rockland and tropical
hardwood hammock. These geologically
and climatically distinct islands provide
Great White Heron NWR
Great White Heron NWR was
established in 1938, by Executive Order
7993 signed by President Roosevelt, as
a haven for great white herons,
migratory birds, and other wildlife. The
refuge encompasses 117,683 acres of
land and water with 6,300 acres of land,
including 1,900 land acres which were
designated Wilderness Areas in 1975,
also under Public Law 93–632. While
the islands are primarily mangroves,
some of the larger islands contain pine
rockland and tropical hardwood
hammock habitats. This vast area,
known locally as the ‘‘backcountry,’’
provides critical nesting, feeding, and
resting areas for more than 250 species
of birds. We co-manage this area with
the State through a ‘‘Management
Agreement for Submerged Lands Within
Lower Florida Keys Refuges, Monroe
County, FL
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
finding of no significant impact.
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce our
decision and the availability of the final
CCP and finding of no significant
impact (FONSI) for the Environmental
Assessment for the Lower Florida Keys
Refuges in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
requirements. We completed a thorough
analysis of impacts on the human
environment, which are included in the
Environmental Assessment (Appendix
N of the CCP). The CCP will guide us
in managing and administering the
Lower Florida Keys Refuges for the next
15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of
the CCP by writing to: Ms. Anne
Morkill, Refuge Manager, Florida Keys
National Wildlife Refuge Complex,
28590 Watson Boulevard, Big Pine Key,
FL 33043. You may also access and
download the document from the
Service’s Web site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Anne Morkill; telephone: 305/872–2239;
or Mary Morris, Natural Resource
Planner; telephone 850/567–6202.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1802-1803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-443]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Termination of the Environmental Impact Statement for the General
Management Plan, Gila Cliff Dwellings National Monument
AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of termination of the Environmental Impact Statement for
the General Management Plan, Gila Cliff Dwellings National Monument,
New Mexico.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) is terminating the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Gila Cliff Dwellings
General Management Plan because it has determined that an Environmental
Assessment (EA) is the more appropriate National Environmental Policy
Act compliance document. A Notice of Intent to prepare the EIS for the
Gila Cliff Dwellings General Management Plan was published on April 16,
2008 (Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 74). Scoping conducted for the plan
indicated that there were no significant impacts or controversy
identified by the public. A preliminary impact analysis indicated that
the alternatives have limited potential to result in significant/major
effects on the human environment as they focus on different ways of
protecting resources, providing appropriate visitor experiences, and
addressing joint NPS/Forest Service operations. For these reasons the
NPS determined the proposal would not require an EIS.
[[Page 1803]]
DATES: The request to terminate the Environmental Impact Statement and
proceed with an Environmental Assessment was approved by the Chief of
the NPS Environmental Quality Division on November 4, 2009. The draft
general management plan and Environmental Assessment is expected to be
distributed for a 30 day public comment period early in 2011 and a
decision is expected be made in the fall of 2011. The NPS will notify
the public by mail, Web site, and other means, and will include
information on where and how to obtain a copy of the GMP/EA, how to
comment on the plan, and the dates of the public comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Riley, Superintendent, Gila
Cliff Dwellings National Monument, HC 68 Box 100, Silver City, NM
88061. Telephone (575) 536-9461.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In place of the EIS, the NPS will prepare an
Environmental Assessment (EA) that analyzes four alternatives (no-
action and three action alternatives) that look at different ways of
protecting resources, providing appropriate visitor experiences, and
addressing joint NPS/Forest Service operations:
--Alternative 1 (No-Action) would continue the present management
direction.
--Alternative 2 would emphasize and expand high-quality visitor
services and experiences by providing more comprehensive interpretation
of the Gila Headwaters area and its 2,000 years of human occupation.
--Alternative 3 would enhance visitor understanding and enjoyment of
the Gila Headwaters' natural and cultural heritage by providing a more
unified management approach to the two units of the monument.
--Alternative 4 would forge more personal connections between visitors
and the ancient cultures and wilderness character of the monument.
Dated: November 12, 2009.
Michael D. Snyder,
Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-443 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-FA-P