Security Zone; Escorted U.S. Navy Submarines in Sector Seattle Captain of the Port Zone, 1709-1712 [2010-438]

Agencies

• Coast Guard
• DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1709-1712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-438]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2009-1057]
RIN 1625-AA87


Security Zone; Escorted U.S. Navy Submarines in Sector Seattle 
Captain of the Port Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a moving security zone around 
any U.S. Navy submarine that is operating in the Sector Seattle Captain 
of the Port Zone, which includes the Puget Sound and coastal waters of 
the State of Washington, and is being escorted by the Coast Guard. The 
security zone is necessary to help ensure the security of the 
submarines, their Coast Guard security escorts, and the maritime public 
in general. The security zone will do so by prohibiting all persons and 
vessels from coming within 1,000 yards of an escorted submarine unless 
authorized by the Coast Guard patrol commander.

DATES: This rule is effective January 13, 2010. Comments and related 
material must reach the Coast Guard on or before April 13, 2010. 
Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on or 
before February 12, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2009-1057 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone 
number is 202-366-9329.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods. 
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of 
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on 
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this interim 
rule, call or e-mail LT Matthew N. Jones, Staff Attorney, Thirteenth 
Coast Guard District; telephone 206-220-7155, e-mail 
Matthew.N.Jones@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or 
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program 
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted, 
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking (USCG-2009-1057), indicate the specific section of this 
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each 
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material 
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or hand 
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a 
comment online via https://

[[Page 1710]]

www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard 
when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, 
or mail your comment, it will be considered as having been received by 
the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket Management Facility. 
We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an e-
mail address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so 
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov, 
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become 
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select 
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2009-1057'' in the ``Keyword'' box. 
Click ``Search,'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions'' 
column. If you submit comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in 
an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would 
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, 
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and 
material received during the comment period and may change this rule 
based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, 
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted 
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2009-1057'' and click 
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column. 
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on 
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an 
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket 
Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any 
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or 
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice 
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a 
request for one on or before February 12, 2010 using one of the four 
methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a 
public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid 
this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a 
later notice in the Federal Register.

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this interim rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because publishing an NPRM would be contrary 
to the public interest since U.S. Navy submarine operations in the 
Sector Seattle Captain of the Port Zone are ongoing, making the 
security zone created by this rule immediately necessary to help ensure 
the security of the submarines, their Coast Guard security escorts, and 
the maritime public in general.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register because waiting 30 days would be 
contrary to the public interest since U.S. Navy submarine operations in 
the Sector Seattle Captain of the Port Zone are ongoing, making the 
security zone created by this rule immediately necessary to help ensure 
the security of the submarines, their Coast Guard security escorts, and 
the maritime public in general.

Background and Purpose

    U.S. Navy submarines frequently operate in the Sector Seattle 
Captain of the Port Zone as defined in 33 CFR 3.65-10, which includes 
the Puget Sound and coastal waters of the State of Washington. Due to 
the numerous security concerns involved with submarine operations near 
shore, the Coast Guard frequently provides security escorts of 
submarines when operating in those areas. Security escorts of this type 
require the Coast Guard personnel on-scene to make quick judgments 
about the intent of vessels operating in close proximity to the 
submarines and decide, occasionally with little information about the 
vessels or persons on board, whether or not they pose a threat to the 
submarine.
    The security zone established by this rule will keep persons and 
vessels a sufficient distance away from submarines operating in and 
around the Puget Sound and coastal waters of Washington so as to (1) 
avoid unnecessary and potentially dangerous contact with or distraction 
of Coast Guard security escorts and (2) give Coast Guard security 
escorts additional time and space to determine the intent of vessels 
that, for whatever reason, are operating too close to a submarine. Both 
of these effects will help ensure the security of the submarines, their 
Coast Guard security escorts, and the maritime public in general.

Discussion of Rule

    This rule establishes a moving security zone encompassing all 
waters within 1,000 yards of any U.S. Navy submarine that is operating 
in the Sector Seattle Captain of the Port Zone as defined in 33 CFR 
3.65-10, which includes the Puget Sound and coastal waters of the State 
of Washington, and is being escorted by the Coast Guard. All persons 
and vessels are prohibited from entering the security zone unless 
authorized by the Coast Guard patrol commander. While naval vessel 
protection zones, under 33 CFR 165.2030, around these escorted U.S. 
Navy submarines are still in effect, persons would need to seek 
permission from the Coast Guard patrol commander to enter within 1,000 
yards of these escorted submarines while they are in the Sector Seattle 
Captain of the Port Zone.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this interim rule after considering numerous statutes 
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not 
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order.
    The Coast Guard has made this determination based on the fact that 
(1) the security zone is only in effect for the

[[Page 1711]]

short periods of time when submarines are operating in and around the 
Puget Sound and other coastal waters of Washington and being escorted 
by the Coast Guard, (2) the security zone moves with the submarines, 
(3) vessels will be able to transit around the security zone at most 
locations in the Puget Sound and other coastal waters of Washington, 
and (4) vessels may, if necessary, be authorized to enter the security 
zone with the permission of the Coast Guard patrol commander.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which 
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to 
transit an area covered by the security zone. The security zone will 
not, however, have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities because (1) the security zone is only in 
effect for the short periods of time when submarines are operating in 
and around the Puget Sound and other coastal waters of Washington and 
being escorted by the Coast Guard, (2) the security zone moves with the 
submarines, (3) vessels will be able to transit around the security 
zone at most locations in the Puget Sound and other coastal waters of 
Washington, and (4) vessels may, if necessary, be authorized to enter 
the security zone with the permission of the Coast Guard patrol 
commander.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its 
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we 
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security

[[Page 1712]]

Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually 
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. 
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph 
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a 
security zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical 
exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated 
under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.


0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.1327 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.1327  Security Zone; Escorted U.S. Navy Submarines in Sector 
Seattle Captain of the Port Zone.

    (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters 
within 1,000 yards of any U.S. Navy submarine that is operating in the 
Sector Seattle Captain of the Port Zone, as defined in 33 CFR 3.65-10, 
and that is being escorted by the Coast Guard.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33 
CFR part 165, subpart D, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the 
security zone created by paragraph (a) of this section unless 
authorized by the Coast Guard patrol commander. 33 CFR part 165, 
subpart D, contains additional provisions applicable to the security 
zone created in paragraph (a) of this section.
    (c) Notification. The Coast Guard security escort will attempt, 
when necessary and practicable, to notify any persons or vessels inside 
or in the vicinity of the security zone created in paragraph (a) of 
this section of its existence via VHF Channel 16 and/or any other means 
reasonably available.

    Dated: December 16, 2009.
G.T. Blore,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 2010-438 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P