Drawbridge Operation Regulation; New Haven Harbor, Quinnipiac and Mill Rivers, CT, 1738-1741 [2010-435]
Download as PDF
1738
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2010 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 31.3504–1 Designation of Agent by
Application.
(a) In general. In the event wages as
defined in chapter 21 or 24 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or
compensation as defined in chapter 22
of the Code, of an employee or group of
employees, employed by one or more
employers, is paid by a fiduciary, agent,
or other person (‘‘agent’’), or if that agent
has the control, receipt, custody, or
disposal of those wages, or
compensation, the Internal Revenue
Service may, subject to the terms and
conditions as it deems proper, authorize
that agent to perform the acts required
of the employer or employers under
those provisions of the Code and the
regulations which have application, for
purposes of the taxes imposed by the
chapter or chapters, in respect of the
wages or compensation. If the agent is
authorized by the Internal Revenue
Service to perform such acts, all
provisions of law (including penalties)
and of the regulations applicable to an
employer shall be applicable to the
agent. However, each employer for
whom the agent acts shall remain
subject to all provisions of law
(including penalties) and of the
regulations applicable to an employer.
Any application to authorize an agent to
perform such acts, signed by the agent
and the employer, shall be made on the
form prescribed by the Internal Revenue
Service and shall be filed with the
Internal Revenue Service as prescribed
in the instructions to the form and other
applicable guidance.
(b) Special rule for home care service
recipients. (1) In general. In the event a
fiduciary, agent, or other person
(‘‘agent’’) is authorized pursuant to
paragraph (a) of this section to perform
the acts required of an employer under
chapters 21 or 24 on behalf of one or
more home care service recipients, as
defined in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, the Internal Revenue Service
may authorize that agent to perform the
acts as are required of employers for
purposes of the tax imposed by chapter
23 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
with respect to wages paid for home
care services, as defined in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, rendered to the
home care service recipient. Each home
care service recipient for whom the
agent performs the acts of an employer
and each agent authorized under this
section to perform the acts of an
employer shall remain subject to all
provisions of law (including penalties)
and of the regulations applicable to an
employer with respect to those wages
paid.
(2) Home care services. For purposes
of this section, the term home care
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:19 Jan 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
services includes health care and
personal attendant care services
rendered in the home care service
recipient’s home or local community.
(3) Home care service recipient. For
purposes of this section, the term home
care service recipient means any
individual who receives home care
services, as defined in paragraph (b)(2)
of this section, while enrolled, and for
the remainder of the calendar year after
ceasing to be enrolled, in a program
administered by a Federal, state, or local
government agency that provides
Federal, state, or local government
funds, to pay, in whole or in part, for
the home care services for that
individual.
(c) Effective and applicability dates.
An authorization under paragraph (a) of
this section in effect prior to the date of
publication of a Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations
in the Federal Register continues to be
in effect after that date. Paragraph (b) of
this section applies to wages paid on or
after January 1 of the calendar year
following the date of publication of a
Treasury decision adopting these rules
as final regulations in the Federal
Register. However, pursuant to section
7805(b), taxpayers may rely on
paragraph (b) of this section for all
taxable years for which a valid
designation is in effect under paragraph
(a) of this section.
Linda M. Kroening,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2010–415 Filed 1–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2009–1021]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; New
Haven Harbor, Quinnipiac and Mill
Rivers, CT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
change the regulation governing the
operation of three bridges across the
Quinnipiac and Mill Rivers at New
Haven, Connecticut, to relieve the
bridge owner from the burden of
crewing the bridges during time periods
when the bridges seldom receive
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requests to open while still providing
for the reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before February 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2009–1021 using any one of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these methods. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Judy Leung-Yee,
Project Officer, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 212–668–7165, e-mail
judy.k.leung-yee@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2009–1021),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2010 / Proposed Rules
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand delivery, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a phone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2009–1021’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2009–
1021’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit either the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:19 Jan 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Ferry Street Bridge at mile 0.7,
across the Quinnipiac River has a
vertical clearance in the closed position
of 25 feet at mean high water and 31 feet
at mean low water.
The Grand Avenue Bridge at mile 1.3,
across the Quinnipiac River has a
vertical clearance in the closed position
of 9 feet at mean high water and 15 feet
at mean low water.
The Chapel Street Bridge at mile 0.4,
across the Mill River has a vertical
clearance of 7 feet at mean high water
and 13 feet at mean low water. The
existing drawbridge operation
regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.213.
The City of New Haven, the owner of
the bridges, requested a change to the
drawbridge operation regulations for the
Ferry Street Bridge across Quinnipiac
River at mile 0.7, the Grand Avenue
Bridge across the Quinnipiac River at
mile 1.3, and the Chapel Street Bridge
at mile 0.4, across the Mill River, all at
New Haven, Connecticut.
During the past four years the Ferry
Street Bridge has undergone a major
rehabilitation. During the rehabilitation
project the movable spans were
removed or left in the open position at
various times allowing navigation to
pass at all times.
Now that the Ferry Street Bridge is
fully operational again, the bridge
owner would like to change the
drawbridge operation schedule for all its
bridges, the Ferry Street Bridge, the
Grand Avenue Bridge and the Chapel
Street Bridge, to help reduce the burden
of crewing these bridges during time
periods when there have been few
requests to open the bridges.
The waterway users are seasonal
recreational craft, commercial fishing,
and construction vessels.
The existing drawbridge operation
regulation listed at 33 CFR 117.213,
authorizes a roving crew concept that
requires the draw of the Ferry Street
Bridge to open on signal from October
1 through April 30, between 9 p.m. and
5 a.m. unless the draw tender is at the
Grand Ave or Chapel Street bridges, in
which case, a delay of up to one hour
in opening is permitted.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1739
The bridge owner would like to
extend the above roving crew concept to
be in effect year round.
As a result, the Coast Guard
implemented a temporary test deviation
(74 FR 27249) on June 9, 2009, to test
the proposed changes to the drawbridge
operation schedule in order to help us
determine whether a permanent change
to the schedule would satisfactorily
accomplish the bridge owners goal and
also continue to meet the reasonable
needs of navigation.
The test period was in effect from
May 1, 2009 through October 26, 2009.
Satisfactory results were received from
the test insofar as there were no adverse
impacts to navigation. In addition, we
received no objection to the operation
schedule during or after the test period
ended. As a result of the successful test,
we are proposing to permanently change
the drawbridge regulations for the three
bridges.
The operation regulation schedule for
the Tomlinson Bridge, which is owned
by the Connecticut Department of
Transportation, will not be changed by
this action and will continue to operate
as listed in the existing regulation.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
Under this proposed rule the Ferry
Street Bridge, the Grand Avenue Bridge,
and the Chapel Street Bridge would
operate as follows:
The Ferry Street Bridge across
Quinnipiac River at mile 0.7, would
open on signal for all marine traffic;
except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., weekdays
except Federal holidays, the draw need
not be opened for the passage of vessel
traffic. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw
would open on signal if at least a one
hour advance notice is given to the draw
tender at the Chapel Street Bridge by
calling (203) 946–7618.
The Grand Avenue Bridge across
Quinnipiac River at mile 1.3, would
open on signal for all marine traffic;
except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., weekdays
except Federal holidays, the draw need
not be opened for the passage of vessel
traffic. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw
would open on signal if at least a one
hour advance notice is given to the draw
tender at the Chapel Street Bridge by
calling (203) 946–7618.
The Chapel Street Bridge across the
Mill River at mile 0.4, would open on
signal for all marine traffic; except that,
from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:45
p.m. to 5:45 p.m., weekdays except
Federal holidays, the draw need not be
opened for the passage of vessel traffic.
From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw would
open on signal if at least a one hour
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
1740
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2010 / Proposed Rules
advance notice is given to the draw
tender by calling (203) 946–7618.
Under the existing regulation all the
above bridges are allowed to remain
closed from noon to 12:15 and from
12:45 to 1 p.m. in addition to the
morning and afternoon rush hour time
periods. The noon time closure periods,
noon to 12:15 and 12:25 to 1 p.m., will
be removed from all the above bridges,
except the Tomlinson Bridge.
The Coast Guard is also removing
obsolete language from the regulation as
part of this action. Paragraphs (4)(b)
through (4)(f) shall be removed because
they are now listed under Subpart A—
General Requirements, § 117.31 and
§ 117.15, and are redundant as a result.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. This
conclusion is based upon the fact that
we tested the above drawbridge
operation schedule and found that it
met the reasonable needs of navigation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. A test period was
in effect from May 1, 2009 through
October 26, 2009. Satisfactory results
were received from the test insofar as
there were no adverse impacts to
navigation. In addition, we received no
objection to the operation schedule
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:19 Jan 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
during or after the test period ended and
found that the operation schedule met
the reasonable needs of navigation.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Commander
(dpb), First Coast Guard District, Bridge
Branch, One South Street, New York,
NY 10004. The telephone number is
(212) 668–7165. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2010 / Proposed Rules
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01,
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment because it
simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.213 to read as follows:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 117.213 New Haven Harbor, Quinnipiac
and Mill Rivers.
The draws of the Tomlinson Bridge,
mile 0.0, the Ferry Street Bridge, mile
0.7, and the Grand Avenue Bridge, mile
1.3, across the Quinnipiac River, and
the Chapel Street Bridge, mile 0.4,
across the Mill River, shall operate as
follows:
(a) The draw of the Tomlinson Bridge
at mile 0.0, across the Quinnipiac River
shall open on signal; except that, from
7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m., noon to 12:15
p.m., 12:45 p.m. to 1 p.m., and 4:45 p.m.
to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, the draw need
not open for the passage of vessel traffic.
11:19 Jan 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: December 28, 2009.
Joseph L. Nimmich,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010–435 Filed 1–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
(b) The draw of the Ferry Street
Bridge at mile 0.7, across Quinnipiac
River, shall open on signal; except that,
from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:45
p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays, the
draws need not open for the passage of
vessel traffic. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the
draw shall open on signal if at least a
one-hour advance notice is given by
calling the number posted at the bridge.
(c) The draw of the Grand Avenue
Bridge at mile 1.3, across the
Quinnipiac River shall open on signal;
except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays,
the draw need not open for the passage
of vessel traffic. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m.
the draw shall open on signal if at least
a one-hour advance notice is given by
calling the number posted at the bridge.
(d) The draw of the Chapel Street
Bridge at mile 0.4, across the Mill River
shall open on signal; except that, from
7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to
5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, the draw need
not open for the passage of vessel traffic.
From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw shall
open on signal after at least a one-hour
advance notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2009-0091;
BFY2009-92210-1117-0000-B2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Determination That
Designation of Critical Habitat is
Prudent for the Jaguar
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of determination.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act), have reconsidered our
prudency determination concerning the
designation of critical habitat for the
jaguar (Panthera onca) and now find
that designation of critical habitat is
prudent. We are preparing a proposed
designation of critical habitat for the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1741
jaguar in accordance with the Act this
fiscal year and anticipate we will
publish a proposed designation in
January 2011.
DATES: To be considered in the
proposed critical habitat designation,
comments and information should be
submitted to us by March 15, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
• Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Keyword
box, enter Docket No. [FWS-R2-ES2009-0091], which is the docket number
for this rulemaking. Then, in the Search
panel on the left side of the screen,
under the Document Type heading,
click on the Proposed Rules link to
locate this document. You may submit
a comment by clicking on ‘‘Send a
Comment or Submission.’’
• By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
or hand-delivery to: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS-R2-ES-20090091; Division of Policy and Directives
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite
222; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see Public
Comment Procedures and Public
Availability of Comments under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for more
information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor,
Arizona Ecological Services Office, 2321
West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103,
Phoenix, AZ 85021-4951; telephone
(602) 242-0210; facsimile (602) 2422513. If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The jaguar, a large member of the cat
family (Felidae), is an endangered
species that currently occurs from
southern Arizona and New Mexico to
southern South America. Jaguars in the
United States are part of a population,
or populations, that occur in Mexico.
Below we present a summary of relevant
information we used in making our
determination that designating critical
habitat in the United States for the
jaguar is prudent. For more information
regarding all aspects of the jaguar, refer
to documents posted on our jaguar
webpage (https://www.fws.gov/
southwest/es/arizona/Jaguar.htm), and
Jaguar Conservation Team documents
and notes (www.azgfd.gov/w_c/es/
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1738-1741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-435]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2009-1021]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; New Haven Harbor, Quinnipiac and
Mill Rivers, CT
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the regulation governing
the operation of three bridges across the Quinnipiac and Mill Rivers at
New Haven, Connecticut, to relieve the bridge owner from the burden of
crewing the bridges during time periods when the bridges seldom receive
requests to open while still providing for the reasonable needs of
navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before February 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2009-1021 using any one of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these methods. See the
``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 212-668-7165, e-mail judy.k.leung-yee@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2009-1021), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be
[[Page 1739]]
considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit
the comment. If you fax, hand delivery, or mail your comment, it will
be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is
received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a phone
number in the body of your document so that we can contact you if we
have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rules'' and insert ``USCG-2009-1021'' in the ``Keyword''
box. Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the
``Actions'' column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11
inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them
by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2009-1021'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit either the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-
140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We
have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the
Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Ferry Street Bridge at mile 0.7, across the Quinnipiac River
has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 25 feet at mean high
water and 31 feet at mean low water.
The Grand Avenue Bridge at mile 1.3, across the Quinnipiac River
has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 9 feet at mean high
water and 15 feet at mean low water.
The Chapel Street Bridge at mile 0.4, across the Mill River has a
vertical clearance of 7 feet at mean high water and 13 feet at mean low
water. The existing drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33
CFR 117.213.
The City of New Haven, the owner of the bridges, requested a change
to the drawbridge operation regulations for the Ferry Street Bridge
across Quinnipiac River at mile 0.7, the Grand Avenue Bridge across the
Quinnipiac River at mile 1.3, and the Chapel Street Bridge at mile 0.4,
across the Mill River, all at New Haven, Connecticut.
During the past four years the Ferry Street Bridge has undergone a
major rehabilitation. During the rehabilitation project the movable
spans were removed or left in the open position at various times
allowing navigation to pass at all times.
Now that the Ferry Street Bridge is fully operational again, the
bridge owner would like to change the drawbridge operation schedule for
all its bridges, the Ferry Street Bridge, the Grand Avenue Bridge and
the Chapel Street Bridge, to help reduce the burden of crewing these
bridges during time periods when there have been few requests to open
the bridges.
The waterway users are seasonal recreational craft, commercial
fishing, and construction vessels.
The existing drawbridge operation regulation listed at 33 CFR
117.213, authorizes a roving crew concept that requires the draw of the
Ferry Street Bridge to open on signal from October 1 through April 30,
between 9 p.m. and 5 a.m. unless the draw tender is at the Grand Ave or
Chapel Street bridges, in which case, a delay of up to one hour in
opening is permitted.
The bridge owner would like to extend the above roving crew concept
to be in effect year round.
As a result, the Coast Guard implemented a temporary test deviation
(74 FR 27249) on June 9, 2009, to test the proposed changes to the
drawbridge operation schedule in order to help us determine whether a
permanent change to the schedule would satisfactorily accomplish the
bridge owners goal and also continue to meet the reasonable needs of
navigation.
The test period was in effect from May 1, 2009 through October 26,
2009. Satisfactory results were received from the test insofar as there
were no adverse impacts to navigation. In addition, we received no
objection to the operation schedule during or after the test period
ended. As a result of the successful test, we are proposing to
permanently change the drawbridge regulations for the three bridges.
The operation regulation schedule for the Tomlinson Bridge, which
is owned by the Connecticut Department of Transportation, will not be
changed by this action and will continue to operate as listed in the
existing regulation.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
Under this proposed rule the Ferry Street Bridge, the Grand Avenue
Bridge, and the Chapel Street Bridge would operate as follows:
The Ferry Street Bridge across Quinnipiac River at mile 0.7, would
open on signal for all marine traffic; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., weekdays except Federal holidays,
the draw need not be opened for the passage of vessel traffic. From 9
p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw would open on signal if at least a one hour
advance notice is given to the draw tender at the Chapel Street Bridge
by calling (203) 946-7618.
The Grand Avenue Bridge across Quinnipiac River at mile 1.3, would
open on signal for all marine traffic; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., weekdays except Federal holidays,
the draw need not be opened for the passage of vessel traffic. From 9
p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw would open on signal if at least a one hour
advance notice is given to the draw tender at the Chapel Street Bridge
by calling (203) 946-7618.
The Chapel Street Bridge across the Mill River at mile 0.4, would
open on signal for all marine traffic; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., weekdays except Federal holidays,
the draw need not be opened for the passage of vessel traffic. From 9
p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw would open on signal if at least a one hour
[[Page 1740]]
advance notice is given to the draw tender by calling (203) 946-7618.
Under the existing regulation all the above bridges are allowed to
remain closed from noon to 12:15 and from 12:45 to 1 p.m. in addition
to the morning and afternoon rush hour time periods. The noon time
closure periods, noon to 12:15 and 12:25 to 1 p.m., will be removed
from all the above bridges, except the Tomlinson Bridge.
The Coast Guard is also removing obsolete language from the
regulation as part of this action. Paragraphs (4)(b) through (4)(f)
shall be removed because they are now listed under Subpart A--General
Requirements, Sec. 117.31 and Sec. 117.15, and are redundant as a
result.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. This conclusion is based
upon the fact that we tested the above drawbridge operation schedule
and found that it met the reasonable needs of navigation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons. A test period was in effect from May 1, 2009 through
October 26, 2009. Satisfactory results were received from the test
insofar as there were no adverse impacts to navigation. In addition, we
received no objection to the operation schedule during or after the
test period ended and found that the operation schedule met the
reasonable needs of navigation.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Commander (dpb), First Coast
Guard District, Bridge Branch, One South Street, New York, NY 10004.
The telephone number is (212) 668-7165. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these
[[Page 1741]]
standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards
(e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation;
test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems
practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment because it simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Revise Sec. 117.213 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.213 New Haven Harbor, Quinnipiac and Mill Rivers.
The draws of the Tomlinson Bridge, mile 0.0, the Ferry Street
Bridge, mile 0.7, and the Grand Avenue Bridge, mile 1.3, across the
Quinnipiac River, and the Chapel Street Bridge, mile 0.4, across the
Mill River, shall operate as follows:
(a) The draw of the Tomlinson Bridge at mile 0.0, across the
Quinnipiac River shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m., noon to 12:15 p.m., 12:45 p.m. to 1 p.m., and 4:45 p.m. to
5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draw
need not open for the passage of vessel traffic.
(b) The draw of the Ferry Street Bridge at mile 0.7, across
Quinnipiac River, shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays, the draws need not open for the passage of vessel
traffic. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at
least a one-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted
at the bridge.
(c) The draw of the Grand Avenue Bridge at mile 1.3, across the
Quinnipiac River shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays, the draw need not open for the passage of vessel
traffic. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at
least a one-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted
at the bridge.
(d) The draw of the Chapel Street Bridge at mile 0.4, across the
Mill River shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30
a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, the draw need not open for the passage of vessel traffic.
From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw shall open on signal after at least a
one-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the
bridge.
Dated: December 28, 2009.
Joseph L. Nimmich,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010-435 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P